Re: OT Test

[David Savage]

I didn't get it.

Dave S.


--
"All I ask is the chance to prove that money can't make me happy." -
Spike Milligan

Re: OT Test

[Graywolf]

The messages got caught in a time warp and are just now arriving (Sept 23).
Rob Studdert wrote:
Received absolutely nothing from the list since the 20th at 10am, are we still 
here? Am I still a subscriber?

These questions and more will be answered shortly
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998

--
graywolf
http://graywolfphoto.com/graywolf.html

Re: OT - test

[Gonz]

I take it your on broadband now?  Woo hoo.
rg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
testing testing 1 2 3,
The big brown fox jumped over the lazy somethingorother
Mary had a little lamb with spuds and gravy
yep, looks like it's working


Cheers,
  Cotty
___/\__
||   (O)   | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_

Re: OT - test

[Keith Whaley]

Aha! Congratulations!
Good to see it works just fine.
keith
Cotty wrote:
testing testing 1 2 3,
The big brown fox jumped over the lazy somethingorother
Mary had a little lamb with spuds and gravy
yep, looks like it's working


Cheers,
  Cotty

RE: OT - test

[frank theriault]

Well, that's the last of my posts that Cotty'll have to read.
I figure that, as a pre-emptive strike, he'll have already kill-filed me!  


-knarf
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds.  The pessimist 
fears it is true."  -J. Robert Oppenheimer



From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "pentax list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: OT - test
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 17:37:51 +0100
testing testing 1 2 3,
The big brown fox jumped over the lazy somethingorother
Mary had a little lamb with spuds and gravy
yep, looks like it's working


Cheers,
  Cotty
___/\__
||   (O)   | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_

_
MSN Premium: Up to 11 personalized e-mail addresses and 2 months FREE*   
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines

Re: OT - test

[Cotty]

On 24/6/04, frank theriault, discombobulated, offered:

>Well, that's the last of my posts that Cotty'll have to read.
>
>I figure that, as a pre-emptive strike, he'll have already kill-filed me!  
>

Why Frank, all your posts I have printed off and sent to a specialist
signwriter and glass-blower who constructs 20 - foot high billboards in
glowing neon and rabbit fur of your missives, that are then paraded
endlessly outside my house by a fleet of purpose-made trucks.

I am not worthy!!!




Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)   | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_

Re: OT - test

[frank theriault]

Kripes, Cotty,
For that kind of money, just pay to fly me over the pond:
I'll whisper my posts into your ear...
-frank

"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds.  The pessimist 
fears it is true."  -J. Robert Oppenheimer



From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "pentax list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: OT - test
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 23:32:55 +0100
On 24/6/04, frank theriault, discombobulated, offered:
>Well, that's the last of my posts that Cotty'll have to read.
>
>I figure that, as a pre-emptive strike, he'll have already kill-filed me!
>
Why Frank, all your posts I have printed off and sent to a specialist
signwriter and glass-blower who constructs 20 - foot high billboards in
glowing neon and rabbit fur of your missives, that are then paraded
endlessly outside my house by a fleet of purpose-made trucks.
I am not worthy!!!
_
Free yourself from those irritating pop-up ads with MSn Premium. Get 2months 
FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines

Re: OT - test

[Cotty]

On 24/6/04, frank theriault, discombobulated, offered:

>Kripes, Cotty,
>
>For that kind of money, just pay to fly me over the pond:
>
>I'll whisper my posts into your ear...

LOL.

Right now I could do with a shoulder massage. Been filming in a rowdy and
crowded pub in Oxford, watching England go out of the European football
championships :-(  It gets past fun and into downright painful territory
with that bloody camera (25 lbs) sitting up there for more than 2 hours
(match, plus extra time plus penalty shoot out). I've had some aspirin
and arnica gel rubbed in but boy that's painful!

Anyway, off to bed.

Cheerio mate.




Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)   | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_

Re: OT - test

[Antonio Aparicio]

Sheesh, and you guys have a go at me for being OT? Why dont you email 
each other with your private chit chat?

A.
On 25 Jun 2004, at 00:55, Cotty wrote:
On 24/6/04, frank theriault, discombobulated, offered:
Kripes, Cotty,
For that kind of money, just pay to fly me over the pond:
I'll whisper my posts into your ear...
LOL.
Right now I could do with a shoulder massage. Been filming in a rowdy 
and
crowded pub in Oxford, watching England go out of the European football
championships :-(  It gets past fun and into downright painful 
territory
with that bloody camera (25 lbs) sitting up there for more than 2 hours
(match, plus extra time plus penalty shoot out). I've had some aspirin
and arnica gel rubbed in but boy that's painful!

Anyway, off to bed.
Cheerio mate.

Cheers,
  Cotty
___/\__
||   (O)   | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_

RE: OT - test

[Tanya Mayer Photography]

Get a grip antonio, they aren't hurting anyone's feelings with THEIR posts,

and besides, I've been laughing along with them with every post.

tan.

-Original Message-
From: Antonio Aparicio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 25 June 2004 9:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT - test


Sheesh, and you guys have a go at me for being OT? Why dont you email 
each other with your private chit chat?

A.


On 25 Jun 2004, at 00:55, Cotty wrote:

> On 24/6/04, frank theriault, discombobulated, offered:
>
>> Kripes, Cotty,
>>
>> For that kind of money, just pay to fly me over the pond:
>>
>> I'll whisper my posts into your ear...
>
> LOL.
>
> Right now I could do with a shoulder massage. Been filming in a rowdy 
> and
> crowded pub in Oxford, watching England go out of the European football
> championships :-(  It gets past fun and into downright painful 
> territory
> with that bloody camera (25 lbs) sitting up there for more than 2 hours
> (match, plus extra time plus penalty shoot out). I've had some aspirin
> and arnica gel rubbed in but boy that's painful!
>
> Anyway, off to bed.
>
> Cheerio mate.
>
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>   Cotty
>
>
> ___/\__
> ||   (O)   | People, Places, Pastiche
> ||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
> _
>
>

Re: OT - test

[Gonz]

Geez guys, get a room will ya!
;)
rg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24/6/04, frank theriault, discombobulated, offered:

Kripes, Cotty,
For that kind of money, just pay to fly me over the pond:
I'll whisper my posts into your ear...

LOL.
Right now I could do with a shoulder massage. Been filming in a rowdy and
crowded pub in Oxford, watching England go out of the European football
championships :-(  It gets past fun and into downright painful territory
with that bloody camera (25 lbs) sitting up there for more than 2 hours
(match, plus extra time plus penalty shoot out). I've had some aspirin
and arnica gel rubbed in but boy that's painful!
Anyway, off to bed.
Cheerio mate.

Cheers,
  Cotty
___/\__
||   (O)   | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_

Re: OT - test

[frank theriault]

I'm sorry, Gonz,
Did ya wanna join us?

-frank
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds.  The pessimist 
fears it is true."  -J. Robert Oppenheimer



From: Gonz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT - test
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 18:42:33 -0500
Geez guys, get a room will ya!
;)
_
MSN Premium includes powerful parental controls and get 2 months FREE*   
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines

RE: OT - test

[frank theriault]

Oh, is Antonio still talking to me?  He still hasn't figured out he's 
kill-filed?  My bet is Cotty's already got him kill-filed.

What a maroon.  What a nin-cow-poop.
It is to laugh.
BTW, hi, Tan.  
cheers,
frank
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds.  The pessimist 
fears it is true."  -J. Robert Oppenheimer



From: "Tanya Mayer Photography" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: OT - test
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 09:20:05 +1000
Get a grip antonio, they aren't hurting anyone's feelings with THEIR posts,
and besides, I've been laughing along with them with every post.
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Antonio Aparicio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 25 June 2004 9:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT - test
Sheesh, and you guys have a go at me for being OT? Why dont you email
each other with your private chit chat?
A.

_
MSN Premium with Virus Guard and Firewall* from McAfee® Security : 2 months 
FREE*   
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines

RE: OT - test

[frank theriault]

Funny how Antonio, who doesn't know me at all, calls me a bully, then, 
knowing that I don't receive his posts, actually goes out of his way to try 
to push my buttons.

That sort of stuff speaks volumes, you great big goofball.  Pretty obvious 
who the troll is, eh?

BTW, hi again, Tan.  I should have the 5x7's of that pic done by early next 
week.

cheers,
frank
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds.  The pessimist 
fears it is true."  -J. Robert Oppenheimer



From: "Tanya Mayer Photography" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: OT - test
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 09:20:05 +1000
Get a grip antonio, they aren't hurting anyone's feelings with THEIR posts,
and besides, I've been laughing along with them with every post.
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Antonio Aparicio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 25 June 2004 9:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT - test
Sheesh, and you guys have a go at me for being OT? Why dont you email
each other with your private chit chat?
A.
On 25 Jun 2004, at 00:55, Cotty wrote:
> On 24/6/04, frank theriault, discombobulated, offered:
>
>> Kripes, Cotty,
>>
>> For that kind of money, just pay to fly me over the pond:
>>
>> I'll whisper my posts into your ear...
>
> LOL.
>
> Right now I could do with a shoulder massage. Been filming in a rowdy
> and
> crowded pub in Oxford, watching England go out of the European football
> championships :-(  It gets past fun and into downright painful
> territory
> with that bloody camera (25 lbs) sitting up there for more than 2 hours
> (match, plus extra time plus penalty shoot out). I've had some aspirin
> and arnica gel rubbed in but boy that's painful!
>
> Anyway, off to bed.
>
> Cheerio mate.
>
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>   Cotty
>
>
> ___/\__
> ||   (O)   | People, Places, Pastiche
> ||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
> _
>
>

_
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN Premium. Get 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines

Re: OT - test

[Antonio Aparicio]

1 rule for the "in" crow eh, another for the rest 
Antonio

On 25 Jun 2004, at 01:20, Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
Get a grip antonio, they aren't hurting anyone's feelings with THEIR 
posts,

and besides, I've been laughing along with them with every post.
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Antonio Aparicio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 25 June 2004 9:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT - test
Sheesh, and you guys have a go at me for being OT? Why dont you email
each other with your private chit chat?
A.
On 25 Jun 2004, at 00:55, Cotty wrote:
On 24/6/04, frank theriault, discombobulated, offered:
Kripes, Cotty,
For that kind of money, just pay to fly me over the pond:
I'll whisper my posts into your ear...
LOL.
Right now I could do with a shoulder massage. Been filming in a rowdy
and
crowded pub in Oxford, watching England go out of the European 
football
championships :-(  It gets past fun and into downright painful
territory
with that bloody camera (25 lbs) sitting up there for more than 2 
hours
(match, plus extra time plus penalty shoot out). I've had some aspirin
and arnica gel rubbed in but boy that's painful!

Anyway, off to bed.
Cheerio mate.

Cheers,
  Cotty
___/\__
||   (O)   | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_

Re: OT - test

[Frits Wüthrich]

Good thing England lost that game, else you had another night in a pub coming in a few 
days, with even more shoulder pain.

On Friday 25 June 2004 00:55, Cotty wrote:
FJW> On 24/6/04, frank theriault, discombobulated, offered:
FJW> 
FJW> >Kripes, Cotty,
FJW> >
FJW> >For that kind of money, just pay to fly me over the pond:
FJW> >
FJW> >I'll whisper my posts into your ear...
FJW> 
FJW> LOL.
FJW> 
FJW> Right now I could do with a shoulder massage. Been filming in a rowdy and
FJW> crowded pub in Oxford, watching England go out of the European football
FJW> championships :-(  It gets past fun and into downright painful territory
FJW> with that bloody camera (25 lbs) sitting up there for more than 2 hours
FJW> (match, plus extra time plus penalty shoot out). I've had some aspirin
FJW> and arnica gel rubbed in but boy that's painful!
FJW> 
FJW> Anyway, off to bed.
FJW> 
FJW> Cheerio mate.
FJW> 
FJW> 
FJW> 
FJW> 
FJW> Cheers,
FJW>   Cotty
FJW> 
FJW> 
FJW> ___/\__
FJW> ||   (O)   | People, Places, Pastiche
FJW> ||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
FJW> _
FJW> 
FJW> 
FJW> 
FJW> 

-- 
Frits Wüthrich

Re: OT - test

[Keith Whaley]

Open letter to Cotty!
Why _ever_ do those cameras weigh 25 lbs?
You would think that with the advances in image recording technology in 
the past 10 years, they'd be able to shrink the size of those cameras 
considerably!
I know the weight helps steady things, but that's what we have IS for!
So it seems to me.

Have you taken out stock in the makers of arnica gel?  
keith
Frits Wüthrich wrote:
Good thing England lost that game, else you had another night in a pub coming in a few 
days, with even more shoulder pain.
On Friday 25 June 2004 00:55, Cotty wrote:

FJW> Right now I could do with a shoulder massage. Been filming in a rowdy and
FJW> crowded pub in Oxford, watching England go out of the European football
FJW> championships :-(  It gets past fun and into downright painful territory
FJW> with that bloody camera (25 lbs) sitting up there for more than 2 hours
FJW> (match, plus extra time plus penalty shoot out). I've had some aspirin
FJW> and arnica gel rubbed in but boy that's painful!
FJW> 
FJW> Anyway, off to bed.
FJW> 
FJW> Cheerio mate.

Re: OT - test

[Frantisek Vlcek]

C> Oh yeah, is it working fine. It's really weird to be getting PDML
C> messages in real time.

Hah! So can we except to read more cottisms now on PDML ;-) ?


Best regards,
   Frantisek Vlcek

Re: OT - test

[Cotty]

On 25/6/04, Frits Wüthrich, discombobulated, offered:

>Good thing England lost that game, else you had another night in a pub
>coming in a few days, with even more shoulder pain.

Funny, I thought exactly the same thing ;-)




Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)   | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_

Re: OT - test

[graywolf]

Well I can answer that one. They don't weigh 25 lbs. The big fast zoom lens, and 
big heavy batteries (remember they need to run that thing for up to a couple of 
hours) are most of that weight. The rest is simply ruggedness. Those camcorders 
get thrown around and beat up a lot. Something like Adelheid's nifty Canon XL-1 
(6 lbs or so) would not last 6 months in heavy news use.

And the advances in technology did lighten them they used to weigh 45-50 lbs.
--
Keith Whaley wrote:
Open letter to Cotty!
Why _ever_ do those cameras weigh 25 lbs?
You would think that with the advances in image recording technology in 
the past 10 years, they'd be able to shrink the size of those cameras 
considerably!
I know the weight helps steady things, but that's what we have IS for!
So it seems to me.

Have you taken out stock in the makers of arnica gel?  
keith
Frits Wüthrich wrote:
Good thing England lost that game, else you had another night in a pub 
coming in a few days, with even more shoulder pain.

On Friday 25 June 2004 00:55, Cotty wrote:

FJW> Right now I could do with a shoulder massage. Been filming in a 
rowdy and
FJW> crowded pub in Oxford, watching England go out of the European 
football
FJW> championships :-(  It gets past fun and into downright painful 
territory
FJW> with that bloody camera (25 lbs) sitting up there for more than 2 
hours
FJW> (match, plus extra time plus penalty shoot out). I've had some 
aspirin
FJW> and arnica gel rubbed in but boy that's painful!
FJW> FJW> Anyway, off to bed.
FJW> FJW> Cheerio mate.


--
graywolf
http://graywolfphoto.com/graywolf.html

Re: OT - test

[Steve Jolly]

On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Cotty wrote:
Why Frank, all your posts I have printed off and sent to a specialist
signwriter and glass-blower who constructs 20 - foot high billboards in
glowing neon and rabbit fur of your missives, that are then paraded
endlessly outside my house by a fleet of purpose-made trucks.
I bet that you lot think he's joking.
S

Re: OT - test

[John Francis]

> 
> Open letter to Cotty!
> 
> Why _ever_ do those cameras weigh 25 lbs?
> You would think that with the advances in image recording technology in 
> the past 10 years, they'd be able to shrink the size of those cameras 
> considerably!

At Portland last weekend I noticed a small remote camera perched on top
of the catch fencing.  The camera body was about the size of a three-pack
of video tapes, and the lens assembly was around the size of a coke can.

Closer inspection revealed this to be an HDTV camera.  It was externally
powered (which is how I first spotted it), and had no record capability,
but I was still impressed by the small size as compared to a BetaCam.

Re: OT - test

[Steve Jolly]

On Fri, 25 Jun 2004, Cotty wrote:
You asked about size. Other things that stipulate a camera's size:
acquisition format (tape, basically). Betacam is made by Sony and a
camera tape is physically identical in size to the old Betamax tapes you
may recall that died after JVC won the domestic market in videotape all
those years ago. Panasonic is another contender with its DVC Pro, and
they are smaller tapes, as is Sony's own DV Cam. Surprisingly the high
end cameras using these latter two formats are not much smaller than a
Betacam.
Hmmm, I've been playing with a Sony DCR-VX2000E lately, which is the 
standard camera the BBC's issuing its video journalists with right now (a 
video journalist is one person doing all the jobs of a reporter, camera 
operator, sound operator and producer...) - it's a hell of a lot lighter 
than beta; perhaps 12lb including a mounted shotgun mike and two-hour 
battery?  It's not rugged though; that's probably the difference.  I guess 
there's news and there's news :-)

Betacam is definitely broadcast-quality though; the smaller formats aren't 
really.

(Disclaimer - I now work for the BBC and therefore consider myself 
entirely qualified to bore the list with this kind of thing ;-) )

S

Re: OT - test

[Bob W]

Hi,

Friday, June 25, 2004, 8:43:04 PM, Steve wrote:

> On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Cotty wrote:
>> Why Frank, all your posts I have printed off and sent to a specialist
>> signwriter and glass-blower who constructs 20 - foot high billboards in
>> glowing neon and rabbit fur of your missives, that are then paraded
>> endlessly outside my house by a fleet of purpose-made trucks.

> I bet that you lot think he's joking.

If anybody doubts it, they should take a look at Cotty's Oxford house:
http://www.headington.org.uk/history/misc/shark.htm

-- 
Cheers,
 Bob

Re: OT - test

[Cotty]

On 25/6/04, Steve Jolly, discombobulated, offered:

>> Why Frank, all your posts I have printed off and sent to a specialist
>> signwriter and glass-blower who constructs 20 - foot high billboards in
>> glowing neon and rabbit fur of your missives, that are then paraded
>> endlessly outside my house by a fleet of purpose-made trucks.
>
>I bet that you lot think he's joking.

LOL!!!

Excuse me, on of the truck drivers needs the bathroom...




Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)   | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_

Re: OT - test

[Cotty]

On 25/6/04, Steve Jolly, discombobulated, offered:

>Hmmm, I've been playing with a Sony DCR-VX2000E lately, which is the 
>standard camera the BBC's issuing its video journalists with right now (a 
>video journalist is one person doing all the jobs of a reporter, camera 
>operator, sound operator and producer...) - it's a hell of a lot lighter 
>than beta; perhaps 12lb including a mounted shotgun mike and two-hour 
>battery?  It's not rugged though; that's probably the difference.  I guess 
>there's news and there's news :-)

Plus, it is being used by people who generally haven't got a clue as to
what they are doing. If you've never seen  a VJ at a press conference,
they're the one who is red in the face from huffing and puffing to and
fro, trying to get shots, trying to take notes, trying to arrange
interviews, trying to organise playouts/dispatch riders, trying to figure
the camera out, trying to get it all together - - and doing a pretty
miserable job of it all. Meanwhile, reporter + camera persons are
(respectively) doing the organising + getting the footage all in double
quick time. I kid you not: the VJ is the first to arrive and the last to
depart a presser, and the result sucks big time. But the people who have
the power to make these things happen, the people in charge of TV
companies now are not program makers, they are corporate execs who could
be in charge of a telecoms co, a fast food chain, a retail chain,
anything you care to mention. It's all about money. Quality is taking a
back seat. Nearly.




>
>Betacam is definitely broadcast-quality though; the smaller formats aren't 
>really.
>
>(Disclaimer - I now work for the BBC and therefore consider myself 
>entirely qualified to bore the list with this kind of thing ;-) )

Steve, if you want to improve the TV news, forget about consolidating
staff positions through hardware, instead - make things faster. Instant
broadcast quality live pics and sound from anywhere via mobile technology
with minimal fuss will be a big step forward. Forget landlines etc, it
needs to be completely standalone, operating in the field, no mid-points,
but no satellites either- too expensive. maybe new mpeg compression or
something?




Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)   | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_

Re: OT - test

[Cotty]

On 25/6/04, John Francis, discombobulated, offered:

>> Why _ever_ do those cameras weigh 25 lbs?
>> You would think that with the advances in image recording technology in 
>> the past 10 years, they'd be able to shrink the size of those cameras 
>> considerably!
>
>At Portland last weekend I noticed a small remote camera perched on top
>of the catch fencing.  The camera body was about the size of a three-pack
>of video tapes, and the lens assembly was around the size of a coke can.
>
>Closer inspection revealed this to be an HDTV camera.  It was externally
>powered (which is how I first spotted it), and had no record capability,
>but I was still impressed by the small size as compared to a BetaCam.

As a remote camera, it will have had limited features compared to a jack-
of-all-trades news camera. TV is all about horses for coarses...




Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)   | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_

Re: OT - test

[Cotty]

On 25/6/04, Bob W, discombobulated, offered:

>
>>> Why Frank, all your posts I have printed off and sent to a specialist
>>> signwriter and glass-blower who constructs 20 - foot high billboards in
>>> glowing neon and rabbit fur of your missives, that are then paraded
>>> endlessly outside my house by a fleet of purpose-made trucks.
>
>> I bet that you lot think he's joking.
>
>If anybody doubts it, they should take a look at Cotty's Oxford house:
>http://www.headington.org.uk/history/misc/shark.htm

ROTFL

It's true!



Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)   | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_

Re: OT - test

[Frits Wüthrich]

And nice to see that your email client now properly uses threading. So your email 
messages show up in the thread, instead of creating a new one.

On Thursday 24 June 2004 19:30, Cotty wrote:
FJW> On 24/6/04, Keith Whaley, discombobulated, offered:
FJW> 
FJW> >Aha! Congratulations!
FJW> >Good to see it works just fine.
FJW> 
FJW> Oh yeah, is it working fine. It's really weird to be getting PDML
FJW> messages in real time.
FJW> 
FJW> 
FJW> 
FJW> 
FJW> Cheers,
FJW>   Cotty
FJW> 
FJW> 
FJW> ___/\__
FJW> ||   (O)   | People, Places, Pastiche
FJW> ||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
FJW> _
FJW> 
FJW> 
FJW> 
FJW> 

-- 
Frits Wüthrich

Re: OT - test

[Cotty]

On 27/6/04, Frits Wüthrich, discombobulated, offered:

>And nice to see that your email client now properly uses threading. So
>your email messages show up in the thread, instead of creating a new one.

In digest, you have to copy and paste the subject line into the reply
email - was this action you describe above happening to any other digest
users?




Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)   | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_

Re: OT - test

[Frits Wüthrich]

Actually, I never checked that. For some reason I noticed your email's in the past did 
that, and I didn't realize it was related to reading the digest. I noticed you used to 
reply to your own email messages when you replied to other threads, so I was wondering 
why this happened, now I understand.
I guess that is happening with other readers of the digest as well, but as I didn't 
keep track of who is reading the digest, I never made that connection. 
As I set my email client to thread the messages in my PDML folder, it is an advantage 
for me if this works. 


On Sunday 27 June 2004 14:08, Cotty wrote:
FJW> On 27/6/04, Frits Wüthrich, discombobulated, offered:
FJW> 
FJW> >And nice to see that your email client now properly uses threading. So
FJW> >your email messages show up in the thread, instead of creating a new one.
FJW> 
FJW> In digest, you have to copy and paste the subject line into the reply
FJW> email - was this action you describe above happening to any other digest
FJW> users?
FJW> 
FJW> 
FJW> 
FJW> 
FJW> Cheers,
FJW>   Cotty
FJW> 
FJW> 
FJW> ___/\__
FJW> ||   (O)   | People, Places, Pastiche
FJW> ||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
FJW> _
FJW> 
FJW> 
FJW> 
FJW> 
FJW> 
FJW> 

-- 
Frits Wüthrich

Re: OT - test

[John Forbes]

Steve,
Congratulations on landing the Beeb job.  I seem to recall you were  
interviewing them around the time of the London PDML event.

John
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 23:58:21 +0100 (BST), Steve Jolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
wrote:

On Fri, 25 Jun 2004, Cotty wrote:
I kid you not: the VJ is the first to arrive and the last to
depart a presser, and the result sucks big time. But the people who have
the power to make these things happen, the people in charge of TV
companies now are not program makers, they are corporate execs who could
be in charge of a telecoms co, a fast food chain, a retail chain,
anything you care to mention. It's all about money. Quality is taking a
back seat. Nearly.
:-)
If there's a place for VJs, the scrum at press conferences isn't it.  
Whether there *is* a place for them or not, well, that's definitely not  
my area of expertise. :-)  Suffice it to say that I'm definitely on your  
side in the quality-vs-cost-cutting debate.

Steve, if you want to improve the TV news, forget about consolidating
staff positions through hardware, instead - make things faster. Instant
broadcast quality live pics and sound from anywhere via mobile  
technology
with minimal fuss will be a big step forward. Forget landlines etc, it
needs to be completely standalone, operating in the field, no  
mid-points,
but no satellites either- too expensive. maybe new mpeg compression or
something?
It'll come, I'm sure.  The success of videophones in TV news pretty much  
guarantees it. :-)  Broadcast quality might even be feasible once 3G  
mobile phone technology gets properly off the ground, although quality  
of service and coverage are issues with that technology.  I genuinely  
have no inside information on this one, but I'm sure it's being looked  
at.

S


--
Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/

Re: OT - test

[Cotty]

On 30/6/04, John Forbes, discombobulated, offered:

>Steve,
>
>Congratulations on landing the Beeb job.  I seem to recall you were  
>interviewing them around the time of the London PDML event.
>
>John

I'll bet he *was* interviewing them as well ;-)




Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)   | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_

Re: OT: Test?

[Keith Whaley]

This is the second message I've got from you on this list in a short time..
keith whaley
Don Sanderson wrote:
I've sent several posts now, they don't seem to get through.
Don

RE: OT: Test?

[Don Sanderson]

I've been trying to send one asking some questions about Film vs Digital.
Doesn't seem to want to work.
I'll get it figured out eventually.

BTW: PAW = Photographer At Work???

Thanks
Don

-Original Message-
From: Keith Whaley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 7:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: Test?


This is the second message I've got from you on this list in a short time..

keith whaley

Don Sanderson wrote:

> I've sent several posts now, they don't seem to get through.
> 
> Don
> 
> 
> 

RE: OT: Test?

[Thibs]

Whan we are at it, what about the meaning of PESO ? 

Thibouille

-Message d'origine-
De : Don Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Envoyé : jeudi 1 juillet 2004 14:40
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : RE: OT: Test?

I've been trying to send one asking some questions about Film vs Digital.
Doesn't seem to want to work.
I'll get it figured out eventually.

BTW: PAW = Photographer At Work???

Thanks
Don

-Original Message-
From: Keith Whaley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 7:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: Test?


This is the second message I've got from you on this list in a short time..

keith whaley

Don Sanderson wrote:

> I've sent several posts now, they don't seem to get through.
> 
> Don
> 
> 
> 

Re: OT: Test?

[Antonio Aparicio]

Picture a Week. Like the old photo clubs ...
On 1 Jul 2004, at 14:39, Don Sanderson wrote:
I've been trying to send one asking some questions about Film vs 
Digital.
Doesn't seem to want to work.
I'll get it figured out eventually.

BTW: PAW = Photographer At Work???
Thanks
Don
-Original Message-
From: Keith Whaley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 7:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: Test?
This is the second message I've got from you on this list in a short 
time..

keith whaley
Don Sanderson wrote:
I've sent several posts now, they don't seem to get through.
Don

Re: OT: Test?

[David Nelson]

PESO = Photo Every So Often (-:
Can't remember who coined it, but it works for me (-:
David
Thibs wrote:
Whan we are at it, what about the meaning of PESO ? 

Thibouille
-Message d'origine-
De : Don Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Envoyé : jeudi 1 juillet 2004 14:40
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : RE: OT: Test?

I've been trying to send one asking some questions about Film vs Digital.
Doesn't seem to want to work.
I'll get it figured out eventually.
BTW: PAW = Photographer At Work???
Thanks
Don
-Original Message-
From: Keith Whaley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 7:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: Test?
This is the second message I've got from you on this list in a short time..
keith whaley
Don Sanderson wrote:

I've sent several posts now, they don't seem to get through.
Don

Re: OT: Test?

[Peter J. Alling]

This one did, I guess you pass.
Don Sanderson wrote:
I've sent several posts now, they don't seem to get through.
Don
 

Re: OT: Test

[Cotty]

On 16/7/04, Daniel J. Matyola, discombobulated, offered:

>I am not receiving messages from the list.
>
>If this gets through, I request that someone please reply to the list 
>with a cc to my email address to let me know.


Reading you loud and clear Dan




Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)   | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_

Re: OT: Test

[P. J. Alling]

I hate to tell you this, but I think you're a figment of my 
imagination.  I'm sure Frank is...


John Sessoms wrote:

I apologize, but I just got a mail bounce saying it couldn't verify that
I exist. Wanted to see if it's going to do it again.


This Message was undeliverable due to the following reason:

Each of the following recipients was rejected by a remote mail server.
The reasons given by the server are included to help you determine why
each recipient was rejected.

Recipient: 
Reason:Verification failed for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
The mail server could not deliver mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  The 
account or domain may not exist, they may be blacklisted, or
missing the proper dns entries. 

>
> Sender verify failed

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.





--
You get further with a kind word and a gun, than with a kind word alone.
--Al Capone.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

RE: OT: Test

[John Sessoms]

From: "Bob W"

Looks like it's going to be an interesting day at Lord's tomorrow!


Droll!

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT: Test

[Brian Walters]

Har


Cheers

Brian

++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/

On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 15:08 +0100, "Bob W"  wrote:
> Looks like it's going to be an interesting day at Lord's tomorrow!
> 
> Bob
> 
-- 


-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - Or how I learned to stop worrying and
  love email again


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT - test

[Anthony Farr]

Less than a minute.

Guess your all either sleeping or out taking pictures.

Carry on.

regards, Anthony

   "Of what use is lens and light
to those who lack in mind and sight"
   (Anon)



2009/6/24 Anthony Farr :
> Nothing in the inbox and nothing in the PDML archive for hours.
>
> Just thought I'd ping the list and see how long it takes for the pong
> to come back around ;-)
>
> regards, Anthony
>
>    "Of what use is lens and light
>    to those who lack in mind and sight"
>                                               (Anon)
>

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT - test

[Rob Studdert]

On 24/06/2009, Anthony Farr  wrote:
> Nothing in the inbox and nothing in the PDML archive for hours.
>
> Just thought I'd ping the list and see how long it takes for the pong
> to come back around ;-)

There must be good light world wide ;-)

-- 
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC +10

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT - test

[Anthony Farr]

Evening, Rob.

Been a quiet time on PDML tonight, eh.  For once I'm up-to-date on
this weeks mail, thanks to the lull.  Last month's is another story.
Once it goes back to the second page of Gmail and beyond it's out of
sight and out of mind and I aint never gonna read it.

regards, Anthony

   "Of what use is lens and light
to those who lack in mind and sight"
   (Anon)



2009/6/24 Rob Studdert :
> On 24/06/2009, Anthony Farr  wrote:
>> Nothing in the inbox and nothing in the PDML archive for hours.
>>
>> Just thought I'd ping the list and see how long it takes for the pong
>> to come back around ;-)
>
> There must be good light world wide ;-)
>
> --
> Rob Studdert
> HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
> Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC +10
>

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT - test

[P. J. Alling]

Slow night.

Anthony Farr wrote:

Nothing in the inbox and nothing in the PDML archive for hours.

Just thought I'd ping the list and see how long it takes for the pong
to come back around ;-)

regards, Anthony

   "Of what use is lens and light
to those who lack in mind and sight"
   (Anon)

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

  



--


The free man owns himself. He can damage himself with either eating or 
drinking; he can ruin himself with gambling. If he does he is certainly a damn 
fool, and he might possibly be a damned soul; but if he may not, he is not a 
free man any more than a dog.

--G. K. Chesterton


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT - test

[Ken Waller]

Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f

- Original Message - 
From: "Rob Studdert" 


Subject: Re: OT - test



On 24/06/2009, Anthony Farr  wrote:

Nothing in the inbox and nothing in the PDML archive for hours.

Just thought I'd ping the list and see how long it takes for the pong
to come back around ;-)


There must be good light world wide ;-)


I doubt a lot of photogs would notice



--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC +10



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT: Test

[Charles Robinson]

On Sep 16, 2007, at 9:45, John Sessoms wrote:

> Got my main email computer back operating, but having some trouble  
> with
> the mail and news servers. This is to test whether I can send to  
> the list.
>

Seems you can.  Or did I imagine it?

  -Charles

--
Charles Robinson - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Minneapolis, MN
http://charles.robinsontwins.org



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: OT: Test

[Rebekah]

gotcha

rg2

On 9/16/07, John Sessoms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Got my main email computer back operating, but having some trouble with
> the mail and news servers. This is to test whether I can send to the list.
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>


-- 
"the subject of a photograph is far less important than its composition"

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: OT: Test

[John Sessoms]

From: Charles Robinson
> On Sep 16, 2007, at 9:45, John Sessoms wrote:
> 
>> Got my main email computer back operating, but having some trouble with
>> the mail and news servers. This is to test whether I can send to the list.
>>
> 
> Seems you can.  Or did I imagine it? 

The News server kept rejecting the messages with a message they were too 
old.

Finally figured out the computer date/time got stranded somehow; set to 
the date/time when it crashed ... about 3 days ago.

Evidently the mail server didn't care, cause the date/time was still 
wrong when I sent that (morning of the 18th).

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: OT: Test

[Bob Sullivan]

John,
Got your message, but something is wrong.
Some 10% to 20% of the messages on this list are
you having problems or complaining of problems
with your service.  You need to bite the bullet and
pay for something better.
Regards,  Bob S.

On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 12:12 PM, John  wrote:
> Time-Warner Roadrunner appears to be hosed up again.
>
> I have received no email since 12:01am this morning. Checking that
> against my Yahoo account, there should be several messages from PDML.
>
> At this point, I'm trying to see if I can SEND mail using my TWC
> Roadrunner email account.
>
> --
> Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
> Religion - Answers we must never question.
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT: Test

[John Sessoms]

I already paid for "something better".

Now, I'm just trying to get what I'm paying for to work.

On 5/24/2014 1:20 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:

John,
Got your message, but something is wrong.
Some 10% to 20% of the messages on this list are
you having problems or complaining of problems
with your service.  You need to bite the bullet and
pay for something better.
Regards,  Bob S.

On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 12:12 PM, John  wrote:

Time-Warner Roadrunner appears to be hosed up again.

I have received no email since 12:01am this morning. Checking that
against my Yahoo account, there should be several messages from PDML.

At this point, I'm trying to see if I can SEND mail using my TWC
Roadrunner email account.

--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT: Test

[Jack Davis]

Copy that!

J

- Original Message -
From: "John" 
To: "PDML" , johnsess...@yahoo.com
Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2014 10:12:16 AM
Subject: OT: Test

Time-Warner Roadrunner appears to be hosed up again.

I have received no email since 12:01am this morning. Checking that
against my Yahoo account, there should be several messages from PDML.

At this point, I'm trying to see if I can SEND mail using my TWC
Roadrunner email account.

-- 
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT: Test

[Jack Davis]

Test received!

J

- Original Message -
From: "Bob Sullivan" 
To: "PDML" 
Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2014 10:20:52 AM
Subject: Re: OT: Test

John,
Got your message, but something is wrong.
Some 10% to 20% of the messages on this list are
you having problems or complaining of problems
with your service.  You need to bite the bullet and
pay for something better.
Regards,  Bob S.

On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 12:12 PM, John  wrote:
> Time-Warner Roadrunner appears to be hosed up again.
>
> I have received no email since 12:01am this morning. Checking that
> against my Yahoo account, there should be several messages from PDML.
>
> At this point, I'm trying to see if I can SEND mail using my TWC
> Roadrunner email account.
>
> --
> Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
> Religion - Answers we must never question.
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT: Test

[Daniel J. Matyola]

I received the test email, but it was in my SPAM folder, so I did not
notice it at first.

Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola


On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 1:12 PM, John  wrote:
> Time-Warner Roadrunner appears to be hosed up again.
>
> I have received no email since 12:01am this morning. Checking that
> against my Yahoo account, there should be several messages from PDML.
>
> At this point, I'm trying to see if I can SEND mail using my TWC
> Roadrunner email account.
>
> --
> Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
> Religion - Answers we must never question.
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT: Test

[Jack Davis]

I had several of those happen to me while on Yahoo.
Am now, comcast.

Jack

- Original Message -
From: "Daniel J. Matyola" 
To: "PDML" 
Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2014 11:50:40 AM
Subject: Re: OT: Test

I received the test email, but it was in my SPAM folder, so I did not
notice it at first.

Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola


On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 1:12 PM, John  wrote:
> Time-Warner Roadrunner appears to be hosed up again.
>
> I have received no email since 12:01am this morning. Checking that
> against my Yahoo account, there should be several messages from PDML.
>
> At this point, I'm trying to see if I can SEND mail using my TWC
> Roadrunner email account.
>
> --
> Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
> Religion - Answers we must never question.
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT: Test

[Bob Sullivan]

Now you're appearing in my spam folder.  (not by my doing)
You can't win...

On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 12:30 PM, John Sessoms  wrote:
> I already paid for "something better".
>
> Now, I'm just trying to get what I'm paying for to work.
>
> On 5/24/2014 1:20 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
>>
>> John,
>> Got your message, but something is wrong.
>> Some 10% to 20% of the messages on this list are
>> you having problems or complaining of problems
>> with your service.  You need to bite the bullet and
>> pay for something better.
>> Regards,  Bob S.
>>
>> On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 12:12 PM, John  wrote:
>>>
>>> Time-Warner Roadrunner appears to be hosed up again.
>>>
>>> I have received no email since 12:01am this morning. Checking that
>>> against my Yahoo account, there should be several messages from PDML.
>>>
>>> At this point, I'm trying to see if I can SEND mail using my TWC
>>> Roadrunner email account.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
>>> Religion - Answers we must never question.
>>>
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> PDML@pdml.net
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>>> follow the directions.
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT: Test

[Daniel J. Matyola]

Mine as well.

Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola


On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Bob Sullivan  wrote:
> Now you're appearing in my spam folder.  (not by my doing)
> You can't win...
>
> On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 12:30 PM, John Sessoms  wrote:
>> I already paid for "something better".
>>
>> Now, I'm just trying to get what I'm paying for to work.
>>
>> On 5/24/2014 1:20 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
>>>
>>> John,
>>> Got your message, but something is wrong.
>>> Some 10% to 20% of the messages on this list are
>>> you having problems or complaining of problems
>>> with your service.  You need to bite the bullet and
>>> pay for something better.
>>> Regards,  Bob S.
>>>
>>> On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 12:12 PM, John  wrote:

 Time-Warner Roadrunner appears to be hosed up again.

 I have received no email since 12:01am this morning. Checking that
 against my Yahoo account, there should be several messages from PDML.

 At this point, I'm trying to see if I can SEND mail using my TWC
 Roadrunner email account.

 --
 Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
 Religion - Answers we must never question.

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>> follow the directions.
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT: Test

[John]

That's Ok.

Since I was sending from Yahoo, I expected gmail would deliver it to
SPAM folders. I hoped some others might see it in their inbox or PDML
folders.

Which they did.

What I was really looking for was whether Roadrunner would deliver it to
me. It didn't, but roadrunner email does seem to be back online now. I
think I just lost about 24 hours worth of messages.

The only reason I still have the Yahoo is to cross-check PDML & for
online transactions that require you to give an email address.

Thanks to all who saw it & replied.

On 5/25/2014 11:20 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:

Now you're appearing in my spam folder.  (not by my doing)
You can't win...

On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 12:30 PM, John Sessoms  wrote:

I already paid for "something better".

Now, I'm just trying to get what I'm paying for to work.

On 5/24/2014 1:20 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:


John,
Got your message, but something is wrong.
Some 10% to 20% of the messages on this list are
you having problems or complaining of problems
with your service.  You need to bite the bullet and
pay for something better.
Regards,  Bob S.

On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 12:12 PM, John  wrote:


Time-Warner Roadrunner appears to be hosed up again.

I have received no email since 12:01am this morning. Checking that
against my Yahoo account, there should be several messages from PDML.

At this point, I'm trying to see if I can SEND mail using my TWC
Roadrunner email account.

--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.




--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.




--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

RE: OT-Test.

[Rubenstein, Bruce M (Bruce)]

It's easy, you just tell us where you've seen Elvis, Judge Crater or DB Cooper field 
testing a Pentax DSLR, and I get hit in the face with a pie.
Welcome aboard.

BR

From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sorry about this, I have just subscribed and I'm trying to figure out how it all works.

Handmaid

Re: OT - test, again

[Anthony Farr]

Damn!!!  Henri Toivonen got one into the archive.  That's a run of 5
messages to me, according to the rule below.  Beat that!

regards,
Anthony Farr

- Original Message - 
From: "Anthony Farr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



> The rule is that I have to both receive my previous message back, AND see
it
> in the archives.
>
> regards,
> Anthony Farr
>

Re: OT - test, again

[Henri Toivonen]

Anthony Farr wrote:
Damn!!!  Henri Toivonen got one into the archive.  That's a run of 5
messages to me, according to the rule below.  Beat that!
regards,
Anthony Farr
 

Who? Wha? What?
What did I do? :-)
/Henri

Re: OT - test, again

[Anthony Farr]

You've done nothing wrong, Henri.  In fact, I'm very happy to see someone
else out in listland, I was going a little stir-crazy in solitary
confinement.

The explanation can be read by tracking this thread at:


(the chronological view, aka Date Index, is the most revealing).

regards,
Anthony Farr

- Original Message - 
From: "Henri Toivonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


> Anthony Farr wrote:
>
> >Damn!!!  Henri Toivonen got one into the archive.  That's a run of 5
> >messages to me, according to the rule below.  Beat that!
> >
> >regards,
> >Anthony Farr
> >
> >
> Who? Wha? What?
>
> What did I do? :-)
>
> /Henri
>
>

Re: OT - test, again

[Henri Toivonen]

Anthony Farr wrote:
You've done nothing wrong, Henri.  In fact, I'm very happy to see someone
else out in listland, I was going a little stir-crazy in solitary
confinement.
The explanation can be read by tracking this thread at:

(the chronological view, aka Date Index, is the most revealing).
regards,
Anthony Farr
 

Well, your monologue did arrive to my mailbox atleast. You were starting 
to look a bit stir-crazy, talking to yourself like that. ;-)

/Henri

Re: OT - test, again

[Anthony Farr]

Somebody had to keep the list ticking over.  You can have a turn now.

regards,
Anthony Farr

- Original Message - 
From: "Henri Toivonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> Well, your monologue did arrive to my mailbox atleast. You were starting 
> to look a bit stir-crazy, talking to yourself like that. ;-)
> 
> /Henri
> 
> 

Re: OT - test, again

[Tom Reese]

Anthony Farr's paranoia acted up and he wrote:

"This is sad, I'm talking to myself.

Hellooo.

Did everyone but me unsubscribe and start a new list?

Reminds me of the time my parents moved away while I was at school :-(

Just kidding ;-)"

We're busy writing private e-mails about you. I can't believe not one person
is defending you.



Tom Reese

Re: OT - test, again

[Anthony Farr]

Careful, I might believe you ;-)

regards,
Anthony Farr

- Original Message - 
From: "Tom Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>
> We're busy writing private e-mails about you. I can't believe not one
person
> is defending you.
>
> 
>
> Tom Reese
>
>
>

Re: OT - test, again

[graywolf]

6am Sunday morning and you expect a reply?
--
Anthony Farr wrote:
This is sad, I'm talking to myself.
Hellooo.
Did everyone but me unsubscribe and start a new list?
Reminds me of the time my parents moved away while I was at school :-(
Just kidding ;-)
regards,
Anthony Farr
- Original Message - 
From: "Anthony Farr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Got it back in minutes!  And it's in the archive just as quickly.  So
where
is everybody?  Perfect shooting weather in the northern hemisphere, I
suppose :-)
regards,
Anthony Farr


--
graywolf
http://graywolfphoto.com/graywolf.html

Re: OT - test, again

[Anthony Farr]

At this time of year it will have been light for over an hour, wouldn't it?

regards,
Anthony Farr

- Original Message - 
From: "graywolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


> 6am Sunday morning and you expect a reply?
> 
> --
> 

Re: OT: Test Message

[Ralf R Radermacher]

Am 09.07.19 um 11:50 schrieb John Sessoms:


Still trying to sort out my email problems. Can't tell for sure if only
PDML is affected.


Received loud and clear in Cologne.

Ralf

--
Ralf R. Radermacher  -  Köln/Cologne, Germany
Blog  : http://the-real-fotoralf.blogspot.com
Audio : http://aporee.org/maps/projects/fotoralf
Web   : http://www.fotoralf.de

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT: Test Message

[John]

Thanks. I can see it with Yahoo, but it's still not showing up in my Earthlink 
account inbox.


On 7/9/2019 06:32:13, Ralf R Radermacher wrote:

Am 09.07.19 um 11:50 schrieb John Sessoms:


Still trying to sort out my email problems. Can't tell for sure if only
PDML is affected.


Received loud and clear in Cologne.

Ralf

--
Ralf R. Radermacher  -  Köln/Cologne, Germany
Blog  : http://the-real-fotoralf.blogspot.com
Audio : http://aporee.org/maps/projects/fotoralf
Web   : http://www.fotoralf.de



--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT: Test Message

[Ken Waller]

FWIW, I'm having no issues with my E-link account re PDMLPENTAX.


-Original Message-
>From: John 
>Subject: Re: OT: Test Message
>
>Thanks. I can see it with Yahoo, but it's still not showing up in my Earthlink 
>account inbox.
>
>On 7/9/2019 06:32:13, Ralf R Radermacher wrote:
>> Am 09.07.19 um 11:50 schrieb John Sessoms:
>> 
>>> Still trying to sort out my email problems. Can't tell for sure if only
>>> PDML is affected.
>> 
>> Received loud and clear in Cologne.
>> 
>> Ralf
>> 
>> -- 
>> Ralf R. Radermacher  -  Köln/Cologne, Germany
>> Blog  : http://the-real-fotoralf.blogspot.com
>> Audio : http://aporee.org/maps/projects/fotoralf
>> Web   : http://www.fotoralf.de
>> 
>
>-- 
>Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
>Religion - Answers we must never question.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT: Test Message

[P. J. Alling]

It appears to have gotten to the list.

On 7/9/2019 5:50 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
Still trying to sort out my email problems. Can't tell for sure if 
only PDML is affected.




--
America wasn't founded so that we could all be better.
America was founded so we could all be anything we damn well please.
- P.J. O'Rourke


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT: Test Message

[John]

The chronic problem I've had with using Earthlink with PDML has been that the 
server pool in Atlanta where my emails most often go through regularly appears 
on the black-hole SPAM blocking service that the PDML server uses. It's one guy 
SPAMMING mail lists.


I've talked to Earthlink "tech support" about it and they DON'T CARE.

On 7/9/2019 10:16:40, Ken Waller wrote:

FWIW, I'm having no issues with my E-link account re PDMLPENTAX.


-Original Message-

From: John 
Subject: Re: OT: Test Message

Thanks. I can see it with Yahoo, but it's still not showing up in my Earthlink
account inbox.

On 7/9/2019 06:32:13, Ralf R Radermacher wrote:

Am 09.07.19 um 11:50 schrieb John Sessoms:


Still trying to sort out my email problems. Can't tell for sure if only
PDML is affected.


Received loud and clear in Cologne.

Ralf




--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT: Test Message

[mike wilson]

> On 10 July 2019 at 21:26 John  wrote:
> 
> 
> The chronic problem I've had with using Earthlink with PDML has been that the 
> server pool in Atlanta where my emails most often go through regularly 
> appears 
> on the black-hole SPAM blocking service that the PDML server uses. It's one 
> guy 
> SPAMMING mail lists.
> 
> I've talked to Earthlink "tech support" about it and they DON'T CARE.

Can't you find a leagal eagle willing to initiate a pro bono class action?

> 
> On 7/9/2019 10:16:40, Ken Waller wrote:
> > FWIW, I'm having no issues with my E-link account re PDMLPENTAX.
> > 
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> >> From: John 
> >> Subject: Re: OT: Test Message
> >>
> >> Thanks. I can see it with Yahoo, but it's still not showing up in my 
> >> Earthlink
> >> account inbox.
> >>
> >> On 7/9/2019 06:32:13, Ralf R Radermacher wrote:
> >>> Am 09.07.19 um 11:50 schrieb John Sessoms:
> >>>
> >>>> Still trying to sort out my email problems. Can't tell for sure if only
> >>>> PDML is affected.
> >>>
> >>> Received loud and clear in Cologne.
> >>>
> >>> Ralf

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT: Test Message

[Daniel J. Matyola]

A have never heard of a "pro bono" class action.

First, the cost of conducting that type of litigation is enormous -- even
excluding attorney fees.

Second, one purpose of creating a class action is to get the court to award
attorneys fees paid by the defendant to the attorneys for the class.

Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola


On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 2:02 AM mike wilson  wrote:

>
> Can't you find a leagal eagle willing to initiate a pro bono class action?
>
>
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT: Test Message

[Bill]

On 7/11/2019 7:20 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:

A have never heard of a "pro bono" class action.


That is very much a contradiction in terms.
In Canada, anyway, the majority of class action lawsuits are initiated 
by a handful of ambulance chasers. These are people who are very much in 
it for the money and not any social good that might come from their 
beating up on some corporation.


bill

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT: Test Message

[Bill]

On 7/11/2019 7:20 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:

A have never heard of a "pro bono" class action.


That is very much a contradiction in terms.
In Canada, anyway, the majority of class action lawsuits are initiated 
by a handful of ambulance chasers. These are people who are very much in 
it for the money and not any social good that might come from their 
beating up on some corporation.


bill

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT - Test - pls ignore

[Frits Wüthrich]

still doesn't work?

On Sunday 27 June 2004 21:24, Cotty wrote:
FJW> On 27/6/04, Cotty, discombobulated, offered:
FJW> 
FJW> >>bloody thing
FJW> >
FJW> >refuses to work
FJW> >
FJW> 
FJW> try again
FJW> 
FJW> 
FJW> 

-- 
Frits Wüthrich

Re: OT - Test - pls ignore

[Cotty]

On 28/6/04, Frits Wüthrich, discombobulated, offered:

>still doesn't work?

No! Bloody £$%&£$%&*$!!  thing.




Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)   | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_

Re: OT - Test - pls ignore

[graywolf]

He has managed to filter out all e-mail from the PDML, or people on the PDML. GRIN
Frits Wüthrich wrote:
still doesn't work?
On Sunday 27 June 2004 21:24, Cotty wrote:
FJW> On 27/6/04, Cotty, discombobulated, offered:
FJW> 
FJW> >>bloody thing
FJW> >
FJW> >refuses to work
FJW> >
FJW> 
FJW> try again
FJW> 
FJW> 
FJW> 

--
graywolf
http://graywolfphoto.com/graywolf.html

Re: OT - Test - pls ignore

[graywolf]

Must be that easy to use Mac software...
Cotty wrote:
On 28/6/04, Frits Wüthrich, discombobulated, offered:

still doesn't work?

No! Bloody £$%&£$%&*$!!  thing.

Cheers,
  Cotty
___/\__
||   (O)   | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_


--
graywolf
http://graywolfphoto.com/graywolf.html

Re: OT - Test - pls ignore

[Cotty]

On 28/6/04, graywolf, discombobulated, offered:

>Must be that easy to use Mac software...

Don't start!!!




Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)   | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_

Re: OT - Test - pls ignore

[Cotty]

it's *working*





Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)   | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_

Re: OT Test your Colour IQ

[Mike Hamilton]

On 14-Sep-08, at 5:27 PM, David Savage wrote:

> 
>
> 0 is a perfect score

I scored 38, using a 4 year old Apple Powerbook 12".  My eyes are  
pretty tired now!

Mike

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT Test your Colour IQ

[David J Brooks]

On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 8:25 AM, Doug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 14, 2008, at 7:27 PM, David Savage wrote:
>
>> 
>>
>> 0 is a perfect score
>>
>> I got 111
>
> I got a rock.

Now you just need a hard place and your all set.

Dave
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
>



-- 
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
Ontario Canada

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT Test your Colour IQ

[David J Brooks]

Had a few moments and did the test.

Score of 24 on my Samsung SyncMaster 753df, CRT moniotor, Spyder I version.

Had some bars in the yellow, purple and light green areas.

Dave

On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 7:27 PM, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>
> 0 is a perfect score
>
> I got 111
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
>



-- 
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
Ontario Canada

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

RE: OT Test your Colour IQ

[Maxime Thériault]

Does calibration really matter? I have two non-calibrated Dell E228FP, both
connected with dvi-d cables. I scored 0 on both of them.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 8:26 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: OT Test your Colour IQ


On Sep 14, 2008, at 7:27 PM, David Savage wrote:

> <http://www.xrite.com/custom_page.aspx?PageID=77>
>
> 0 is a perfect score
>
> I got 111

I got a rock.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT Test your Colour IQ

[David J Brooks]

On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Maxime Thériault
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does calibration really matter? I have two non-calibrated Dell E228FP, both
> connected with dvi-d cables. I scored 0 on both of them.

I don't know. It does make a difference for prints at this end.

Your eyes are better than mine then.:-)

Dave
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug
> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 8:26 AM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: OT Test your Colour IQ
>
>
> On Sep 14, 2008, at 7:27 PM, David Savage wrote:
>
>> <http://www.xrite.com/custom_page.aspx?PageID=77>
>>
>> 0 is a perfect score
>>
>> I got 111
>
> I got a rock.
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
>



-- 
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
Ontario Canada

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT Test your Colour IQ

[ann sanfedele]

Maxime Thériault wrote:

>Does calibration really matter? I have two non-calibrated Dell E228FP, both
>connected with dvi-d cables. I scored 0 on both of them.
>
How old are you? :-)

ann (71, got 8)

>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug
>Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 8:26 AM
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>Subject: Re: OT Test your Colour IQ
>
>
>On Sep 14, 2008, at 7:27 PM, David Savage wrote:
>
>  
>
>><http://www.xrite.com/custom_page.aspx?PageID=77>
>>
>>0 is a perfect score
>>
>>I got 111
>>
>>
>
>I got a rock.
>
>  
>



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

RE: OT Test your Colour IQ

[Maxime Thériault]

24, it took me a little while in both try though.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ann
sanfedele
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 10:02 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: OT Test your Colour IQ



Maxime Thériault wrote:

>Does calibration really matter? I have two non-calibrated Dell E228FP, both
>connected with dvi-d cables. I scored 0 on both of them.
>
How old are you? :-)

ann (71, got 8)

>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Doug
>Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 8:26 AM
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>Subject: Re: OT Test your Colour IQ
>
>
>On Sep 14, 2008, at 7:27 PM, David Savage wrote:
>
>  
>
>><http://www.xrite.com/custom_page.aspx?PageID=77>
>>
>>0 is a perfect score
>>
>>I got 111
>>
>>
>
>I got a rock.
>
>  
>



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT Test your Colour IQ

[Paul Stenquist]

Calibration matters when you want to match printer output to what you  
see on the screen, or when you want to make sure that images you  
deliver to clients are color accurate. In terms of this test, it  
doesn't matter because you're identifying color shift between  
samples. And even if the colors your looking at are not accurate, the  
shifts are still proportional.
Paul
(Who did one row and decided he didn't have time for games at the  
moment:-).

On Sep 16, 2008, at 9:44 AM, Maxime Thériault wrote:

> Does calibration really matter? I have two non-calibrated Dell  
> E228FP, both
> connected with dvi-d cables. I scored 0 on both of them.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On  
> Behalf Of Doug
> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 8:26 AM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: OT Test your Colour IQ
>
>
> On Sep 14, 2008, at 7:27 PM, David Savage wrote:
>
>> <http://www.xrite.com/custom_page.aspx?PageID=77>
>>
>> 0 is a perfect score
>>
>> I got 111
>
> I got a rock.
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
>
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above  
> and follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT Test your Colour IQ

[Matthew Hunt]

On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Paul Stenquist
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> (Who did one row and decided he didn't have time for games at the
> moment:-).

Bawk bawk bawk bawk BAKK!

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT Test your Colour IQ

[Scott Loveless]

Maxime Thériault wrote:
> Does calibration really matter?

No, but it's a convenient excuse for people who scored poorly, and an 
"in your face" for those who did well without a calibrated monitor.  Let 
them have their fun, please.  We'll get back to doomsday discussions 
sooner or later.

-- 
Scott Loveless
New Cumberland, PA
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT Test your Colour IQ

[Bruce Dayton]

Hello Doug,

Yes, Halloween is almost here.  Nice one.

-- 
Best regards,
Bruce


Tuesday, September 16, 2008, 5:25:59 AM, you wrote:


D> On Sep 14, 2008, at 7:27 PM, David Savage wrote:

>> 
>>
>> 0 is a perfect score
>>
>> I got 111

D> I got a rock.




-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT Test your Colour IQ

[David Savage]

2008/9/17 Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Maxime Thériault wrote:
>> Does calibration really matter?
>
> No, but it's a convenient excuse for people who scored poorly, and an
> "in your face" for those who did well without a calibrated monitor.  Let
> them have their fun, please.  We'll get back to doomsday discussions
> sooner or later.

I may have blamed my laptop monitor, but I've always known I had poor
colour sense.

:-p

Cheers,

Dave

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT Test your Colour IQ

[ann sanfedele]

I fell much better :-)
ann

Maxime Thériault wrote:

>24, it took me a little while in both try though.
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ann
>sanfedele
>Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 10:02 AM
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>Subject: Re: OT Test your Colour IQ
>
>
>
>Maxime Thériault wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Does calibration really matter? I have two non-calibrated Dell E228FP, both
>>connected with dvi-d cables. I scored 0 on both of them.
>>
>>
>>
>How old are you? :-)
>
>ann (71, got 8)
>
>  
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>>    
>>
>Doug
>  
>
>>Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 8:26 AM
>>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>Subject: Re: OT Test your Colour IQ
>>
>>
>>On Sep 14, 2008, at 7:27 PM, David Savage wrote:
>>
>> 
>>
>>
>>
>>><http://www.xrite.com/custom_page.aspx?PageID=77>
>>>
>>>0 is a perfect score
>>>
>>>I got 111
>>>   
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>I got a rock.
>>
>> 
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>  
>



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT Test your Colour IQ

[ann sanfedele]

I feel much better :-)
ann

Maxime Thériault wrote:

>24, it took me a little while in both try though.
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ann
>sanfedele
>Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 10:02 AM
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>Subject: Re: OT Test your Colour IQ
>
>
>
>Maxime Thériault wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Does calibration really matter? I have two non-calibrated Dell E228FP, both
>>connected with dvi-d cables. I scored 0 on both of them.
>>
>>
>>
>How old are you? :-)
>
>ann (71, got 8)
>
>  
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>>    
>>
>Doug
>  
>
>>Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 8:26 AM
>>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>Subject: Re: OT Test your Colour IQ
>>
>>
>>On Sep 14, 2008, at 7:27 PM, David Savage wrote:
>>
>> 
>>
>>
>>
>>><http://www.xrite.com/custom_page.aspx?PageID=77>
>>>
>>>0 is a perfect score
>>>
>>>I got 111
>>>   
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>I got a rock.
>>
>> 
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>  
>



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT Test your Colour IQ

[Paul Stenquist]

That sounds like a challenge. I'll get to it sooner or later. I think.
Paul
On Sep 16, 2008, at 11:27 AM, Matthew Hunt wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Paul Stenquist
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> (Who did one row and decided he didn't have time for games at the
>> moment:-).
>
> Bawk bawk bawk bawk BAKK!
>
> --  
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above  
> and follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.