Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-09 Thread John Whittingham
On Thu, 08 May 2008 18:09:56 -0400, P. J. Alling wrote
 Nope, if your cover the digital pin you get an A lens, as far as 
 Pentax DSLRs are concerned.

Yep, figured as much, thanks, you saved me some time figuribg that one out. 
Maybe I should enable myself with a lighter tripod.

Regards,

John.



The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed and may contain
confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received an email in error 
please notify Carmel College
on [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete all copies of it from your systems.

Although Carmel College scans incoming and outgoing emails and email 
attachments for viruses we cannot
guarantee a communication to be free of all viruses nor accept any 
responsibility for viruses.

Although Carmel College monitors incoming and outgoing emails for inappropriate 
content, the college cannot
be held responsible for the views or expressions of the author.
The views expressed may not necessarily be those of Carmel College and Carmel 
College cannot be held
responsible for any loss or injury resulting from the contents of a message.




-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-09 Thread Toralf Lund
Cotty wrote:
 On 8/5/08, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:

   
 Insufferable Snideness?
 Increased Spending?
 Illusions of Superiority?
 Irrational Sensations?

 I'm stumped.
 

 Itinerant Snappers.
   
This thread must be, yes you guessed it, incredibly stupid!

-- 
Toralf Lund


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-09 Thread Mark Roberts
Toralf Lund wrote:
 Cotty wrote:
 On 8/5/08, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:

   
 Insufferable Snideness?
 Increased Spending?
 Illusions of Superiority?
 Irrational Sensations?

 I'm stumped.
 
 Itinerant Snappers.
   
 This thread must be, yes you guessed it, incredibly stupid!

What? Not Invigorating and Stimulating? I'm crushed!
;-)





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-09 Thread Michael S. Keller
Ow.

J. C. O'Connell wrote:
 BECAUSE ON A FULL FRAME CAMERA YOUR IMAGE IS OVER TWICE AS BIG
 AND YOU DONT HAVE TO ENLARGE IT NEARLY AS MUCH FOR THE SAME SIZE PRINT.
 I.E. YOUR TOTAL LINES RECORDED EFFECTIVE INCREASE IN BOTH AXIS BY 50%
 APS DEMANDS THE VERY FINEST LENSES FOR BEST RESULTS COMPARED TO FF
 JCO

-- 
-Michael

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-09 Thread David J Brooks
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Michael S. Keller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Ow.

 J. C. O'Connell wrote:
 BECAUSE ON A FULL FRAME CAMERA YOUR IMAGE IS OVER TWICE AS BIG
 AND YOU DONT HAVE TO ENLARGE IT NEARLY AS MUCH FOR THE SAME SIZE PRINT.
 I.E. YOUR TOTAL LINES RECORDED EFFECTIVE INCREASE IN BOTH AXIS BY 50%
 APS DEMANDS THE VERY FINEST LENSES FOR BEST RESULTS COMPARED TO FF
 JCO

STILL NEED TO YELL AT US EH.

DAVE

 --
 -Michael

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.




-- 
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
Ontario Canada

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-09 Thread Scott Loveless
David J Brooks wrote:
 On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Michael S. Keller
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Ow.

 J. C. O'Connell wrote:
 BECAUSE ON A FULL FRAME CAMERA YOUR IMAGE IS OVER TWICE AS BIG
 AND YOU DONT HAVE TO ENLARGE IT NEARLY AS MUCH FOR THE SAME SIZE PRINT.
 I.E. YOUR TOTAL LINES RECORDED EFFECTIVE INCREASE IN BOTH AXIS BY 50%
 APS DEMANDS THE VERY FINEST LENSES FOR BEST RESULTS COMPARED TO FF
 JCO
 
 STILL NEED TO YELL AT US EH.
 
WHAT?  SPEAK UP, DAMNIT!

-- 
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-09 Thread Christian
This shot kinda sucks too.  No detail, color problems, soft, etc.  All 
the issues you'd expect using a TC which I use pretty much all the time 
when I'm shooting birds:

http://links.pictures.aol.com/pic/2d202SU7xah202JL7C4tZUZ-g32GSH2m71BZv4xQp5Fd3Ig=_l.jpg

Oh yeah, I shot it on a tripod using some sort of electronic image 
stabilization. :-P

Christian

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-09 Thread John Whittingham
Dreadful, you can clearly see the effect of the TC on the image quality 8)

John


On Fri, 09 May 2008 12:31:31 -0400, Christian wrote
 This shot kinda sucks too.  No detail, color problems, soft, etc.  
 All the issues you'd expect using a TC which I use pretty much all 
 the time when I'm shooting birds:
 
 http://links.pictures.aol.com/pic/2d202SU7xah202JL7C4tZUZ-
g32GSH2m71BZv4xQp5Fd3Ig=_l.jpg
 
 Oh yeah, I shot it on a tripod using some sort of electronic image 
 stabilization. :-P
 
 Christian
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above 
 and follow the directions.
 
 

 
 The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom 
 it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
 material. If you have received an email in error please notify 
 Carmel College on [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete all copies of it 
 from your systems.
 
 Although Carmel College scans incoming and outgoing emails and email 
 attachments for viruses we cannot guarantee a communication to be 
 free of all viruses nor accept any responsibility for viruses.
 
 Although Carmel College monitors incoming and outgoing emails for 
 inappropriate content, the college cannot be held responsible for 
 the views or expressions of the author. The views expressed may not 
 necessarily be those of Carmel College and Carmel College cannot be held
 responsible for any loss or injury resulting from the contents of a message.
 
 



John Whittingham

Technician




The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed and may contain
confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received an email in error 
please notify Carmel College
on [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete all copies of it from your systems.

Although Carmel College scans incoming and outgoing emails and email 
attachments for viruses we cannot
guarantee a communication to be free of all viruses nor accept any 
responsibility for viruses.

Although Carmel College monitors incoming and outgoing emails for inappropriate 
content, the college cannot
be held responsible for the views or expressions of the author.
The views expressed may not necessarily be those of Carmel College and Carmel 
College cannot be held
responsible for any loss or injury resulting from the contents of a message.




-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-09 Thread Toralf Lund
Mark Roberts wrote:
 Toralf Lund wrote:
   
 Cotty wrote:
 
 On 8/5/08, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:

   
   
 Insufferable Snideness?
 Increased Spending?
 Illusions of Superiority?
 Irrational Sensations?

 I'm stumped.
 
 
 Itinerant Snappers.
   
   
 This thread must be, yes you guessed it, incredibly stupid!
 

 What? Not Invigorating and Stimulating? I'm crushed!
 ;-)
   
I'm Sorry...



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-09 Thread Paul Stenquist
Hadn't seen this one, Christian. Superb!
Paul
On May 9, 2008, at 12:31 PM, Christian wrote:
 This shot kinda sucks too.  No detail, color problems, soft, etc.  All
 the issues you'd expect using a TC which I use pretty much all the  
 time
 when I'm shooting birds:

 http://links.pictures.aol.com/pic/2d202SU7xah202JL7C4tZUZ- 
 g32GSH2m71BZv4xQp5Fd3Ig=_l.jpg

 Oh yeah, I shot it on a tripod using some sort of electronic image
 stabilization. :-P

 Christian

 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above  
 and follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-08 Thread John Whittingham
OK...OK...enough. It would just be nice to have the two EX converters I have 
work effectively with the shake reduction feature, especially being as 
Pentax don't *currently* have a teleconverter in production.

Looks like I'm left covering up pin 7 on the EX Tc's and perhaps digging out 
the A 2X-S and giving that I try. It's a PITA that I have a 70-200/2.8 and 
1.4x Tc and I can't use AF or SR. 

I need some longer lenses.


Regards,

John

On Thu, 8 May 2008 10:53:00 +0800, David Savage wrote
 Those people are retarded.
 
 It's not Pentax's fault that an unsupported 3rd part accessory's 
 doesn't work.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Dave




The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed and may contain
confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received an email in error 
please notify Carmel College
on [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete all copies of it from your systems.

Although Carmel College scans incoming and outgoing emails and email 
attachments for viruses we cannot
guarantee a communication to be free of all viruses nor accept any 
responsibility for viruses.

Although Carmel College monitors incoming and outgoing emails for inappropriate 
content, the college cannot
be held responsible for the views or expressions of the author.
The views expressed may not necessarily be those of Carmel College and Carmel 
College cannot be held
responsible for any loss or injury resulting from the contents of a message.




-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-08 Thread David Savage
At 03:27 PM 8/05/2008, you wrote:
OK...OK...enough. It would just be nice to have the two EX converters I have
work effectively with the shake reduction feature, especially being as
Pentax don't *currently* have a teleconverter in production.


I don't disagree, but for the Pentax Forums simpletons to blame 
Pentax for the behavior of another manufacturers product on their 
camera is silly.

Cheers,

Dave


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-08 Thread John Whittingham
Yes, agreed.

Regards,

John

On Thu, 08 May 2008 15:45:46 +0800, David Savage wrote
 At 03:27 PM 8/05/2008, you wrote:
 OK...OK...enough. It would just be nice to have the two EX converters I 
have
 work effectively with the shake reduction feature, especially being as
 Pentax don't *currently* have a teleconverter in production.
 
 I don't disagree, but for the Pentax Forums simpletons to blame 
 Pentax for the behavior of another manufacturers product on their 
 camera is silly.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Dave
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above 
 and follow the directions.




The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed and may contain
confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received an email in error 
please notify Carmel College
on [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete all copies of it from your systems.

Although Carmel College scans incoming and outgoing emails and email 
attachments for viruses we cannot
guarantee a communication to be free of all viruses nor accept any 
responsibility for viruses.

Although Carmel College monitors incoming and outgoing emails for inappropriate 
content, the college cannot
be held responsible for the views or expressions of the author.
The views expressed may not necessarily be those of Carmel College and Carmel 
College cannot be held
responsible for any loss or injury resulting from the contents of a message.




-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-08 Thread J. C. O'Connell
I bet the reason why is because TCs suck in general and really suck the big
one
on APS sensored cameras.
jco

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David Savage
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 3:46 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D...yet!


At 03:27 PM 8/05/2008, you wrote:
OK...OK...enough. It would just be nice to have the two EX converters I 
have work effectively with the shake reduction feature, especially 
being as Pentax don't *currently* have a teleconverter in production.


I don't disagree, but for the Pentax Forums simpletons to blame 
Pentax for the behavior of another manufacturers product on their 
camera is silly.

Cheers,

Dave


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-08 Thread mike wilson

 
 From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: 2008/05/07 Wed PM 07:40:30 GMT
 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
 Subject: Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D...yet!
 
 John Whittingham wrote:
  http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-dslr-discussion/24491-k20d-
  teleconverters.html
 
 Wow. I take back everything I've ever said about DP Review people being 
 neurotic!

William's on the case.  Armageddon can only be a few posts away.


-
Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-08 Thread John Whittingham

On Thu, 8 May 2008 04:21:10 -0400, J. C. O'Connell wrote
 I bet the reason why is because TCs suck in general and really suck 
 the big one on APS sensored cameras. jco

mwahahaha.. 8)




The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed and may contain
confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received an email in error 
please notify Carmel College
on [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete all copies of it from your systems.

Although Carmel College scans incoming and outgoing emails and email 
attachments for viruses we cannot
guarantee a communication to be free of all viruses nor accept any 
responsibility for viruses.

Although Carmel College monitors incoming and outgoing emails for inappropriate 
content, the college cannot
be held responsible for the views or expressions of the author.
The views expressed may not necessarily be those of Carmel College and Carmel 
College cannot be held
responsible for any loss or injury resulting from the contents of a message.




-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-08 Thread Mark Roberts
David Savage wrote:
 Those people are retarded.
 
 It's not Pentax's fault that an unsupported 3rd part accessory's doesn't work.

It's not even the 3rd-party manufacturer's fault: The teleconverters 
they're complaining about were designed before the shake reduction 
system was even invented!

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-08 Thread John Whittingham
On Thu, 08 May 2008 08:05:17 -0400, Mark Roberts wrote
 David Savage wrote:
  Those people are retarded.
  
  It's not Pentax's fault that an unsupported 3rd part accessory's doesn't 
work.
 
 It's not even the 3rd-party manufacturer's fault: The teleconverters 
 they're complaining about were designed before the shake reduction 
 system was even invented!

Yeah, that's fare comment. The problem's been bugging me for a while and I 
stumbled across the thread whilst looking for solutions..andthe red 
mist descended. 

I've got the A2X-S out this morning but I'm too busy the next few days to go 
and test things out.

John



The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed and may contain
confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received an email in error 
please notify Carmel College
on [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete all copies of it from your systems.

Although Carmel College scans incoming and outgoing emails and email 
attachments for viruses we cannot
guarantee a communication to be free of all viruses nor accept any 
responsibility for viruses.

Although Carmel College monitors incoming and outgoing emails for inappropriate 
content, the college cannot
be held responsible for the views or expressions of the author.
The views expressed may not necessarily be those of Carmel College and Carmel 
College cannot be held
responsible for any loss or injury resulting from the contents of a message.




-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-08 Thread Paul Stenquist
The A2X-S is one of the best converters I've run across. And it will  
at least transmit aperture information.
Paul

On May 8, 2008, at 3:27 AM, John Whittingham wrote:
 OK...OK...enough. It would just be nice to have the two EX  
 converters I have
 work effectively with the shake reduction feature, especially being as
 Pentax don't *currently* have a teleconverter in production.

 Looks like I'm left covering up pin 7 on the EX Tc's and perhaps  
 digging out
 the A 2X-S and giving that I try. It's a PITA that I have a  
 70-200/2.8 and
 1.4x Tc and I can't use AF or SR.

 I need some longer lenses.


 Regards,

 John

 On Thu, 8 May 2008 10:53:00 +0800, David Savage wrote
 Those people are retarded.

 It's not Pentax's fault that an unsupported 3rd part accessory's
 doesn't work.

 Cheers,

 Dave


 -- 
 --

 The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom  
 it is addressed and may contain
 confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received an  
 email in error please notify Carmel College
 on [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete all copies of it from your systems.

 Although Carmel College scans incoming and outgoing emails and  
 email attachments for viruses we cannot
 guarantee a communication to be free of all viruses nor accept any  
 responsibility for viruses.

 Although Carmel College monitors incoming and outgoing emails for  
 inappropriate content, the college cannot
 be held responsible for the views or expressions of the author.
 The views expressed may not necessarily be those of Carmel College  
 and Carmel College cannot be held
 responsible for any loss or injury resulting from the contents of a  
 message.

 -- 
 --


 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above  
 and follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-08 Thread Paul Stenquist
Here's a shot with the A500/5.6 and the A2X-S converter on the K20D.  
Minor fringing in the background, but that could be fixed if I wasn't  
so lazy :-). Converters aren't perfect but the A2X-S is a very good  
one. And, despite what someone here said, it works just as well on  
APS-C as it does on a full frame film camera. Why wouldn't it?
Paul
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7053676size=lg


On May 8, 2008, at 8:26 AM, John Whittingham wrote:
 On Thu, 08 May 2008 08:05:17 -0400, Mark Roberts wrote
 David Savage wrote:
 Those people are retarded.

 It's not Pentax's fault that an unsupported 3rd part accessory's  
 doesn't
 work.

 It's not even the 3rd-party manufacturer's fault: The teleconverters
 they're complaining about were designed before the shake reduction
 system was even invented!

 Yeah, that's fare comment. The problem's been bugging me for a  
 while and I
 stumbled across the thread whilst looking for  
 solutions..andthe red
 mist descended.

 I've got the A2X-S out this morning but I'm too busy the next few  
 days to go
 and test things out.

 John

 -- 
 --

 The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom  
 it is addressed and may contain
 confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received an  
 email in error please notify Carmel College
 on [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete all copies of it from your systems.

 Although Carmel College scans incoming and outgoing emails and  
 email attachments for viruses we cannot
 guarantee a communication to be free of all viruses nor accept any  
 responsibility for viruses.

 Although Carmel College monitors incoming and outgoing emails for  
 inappropriate content, the college cannot
 be held responsible for the views or expressions of the author.
 The views expressed may not necessarily be those of Carmel College  
 and Carmel College cannot be held
 responsible for any loss or injury resulting from the contents of a  
 message.

 -- 
 --


 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above  
 and follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-08 Thread Paul Stenquist
Make that the A400/5.6 and the A2X-S converter. Damn keys:-).

On May 8, 2008, at 9:12 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
 Here's a shot with the A500/5.6 and the A2X-S converter on the K20D.
 Minor fringing in the background, but that could be fixed if I wasn't
 so lazy :-). Converters aren't perfect but the A2X-S is a very good
 one. And, despite what someone here said, it works just as well on
 APS-C as it does on a full frame film camera. Why wouldn't it?
 Paul
 http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7053676size=lg


 On May 8, 2008, at 8:26 AM, John Whittingham wrote:
 On Thu, 08 May 2008 08:05:17 -0400, Mark Roberts wrote
 David Savage wrote:
 Those people are retarded.

 It's not Pentax's fault that an unsupported 3rd part accessory's
 doesn't
 work.

 It's not even the 3rd-party manufacturer's fault: The teleconverters
 they're complaining about were designed before the shake reduction
 system was even invented!

 Yeah, that's fare comment. The problem's been bugging me for a
 while and I
 stumbled across the thread whilst looking for
 solutions..andthe red
 mist descended.

 I've got the A2X-S out this morning but I'm too busy the next few
 days to go
 and test things out.

 John

 - 
 -
 --

 The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom
 it is addressed and may contain
 confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received an
 email in error please notify Carmel College
 on [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete all copies of it from your systems.

 Although Carmel College scans incoming and outgoing emails and
 email attachments for viruses we cannot
 guarantee a communication to be free of all viruses nor accept any
 responsibility for viruses.

 Although Carmel College monitors incoming and outgoing emails for
 inappropriate content, the college cannot
 be held responsible for the views or expressions of the author.
 The views expressed may not necessarily be those of Carmel College
 and Carmel College cannot be held
 responsible for any loss or injury resulting from the contents of a
 message.

 - 
 -
 --


 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
 and follow the directions.


 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above  
 and follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-08 Thread John Whittingham
On Thu, 8 May 2008 09:12:00 -0400, Paul Stenquist wrote
 Here's a shot with the A500/5.6 and the A2X-S converter on the K20D. 
  Minor fringing in the background, but that could be fixed if I 
 wasn't  so lazy :-). 

That's a really nice shot Paul.

 Converters aren't perfect but the A2X-S is a 
 very good  one. And, despite what someone here said, it works just 
 as well on  APS-C as it does on a full frame film camera. Why 
 wouldn't it? Paul 

I know that, you know that, but.
In fact in some respects it works better due to the crop factor.

http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7053676size=lg


Regards,

John



The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed and may contain
confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received an email in error 
please notify Carmel College
on [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete all copies of it from your systems.

Although Carmel College scans incoming and outgoing emails and email 
attachments for viruses we cannot
guarantee a communication to be free of all viruses nor accept any 
responsibility for viruses.

Although Carmel College monitors incoming and outgoing emails for inappropriate 
content, the college cannot
be held responsible for the views or expressions of the author.
The views expressed may not necessarily be those of Carmel College and Carmel 
College cannot be held
responsible for any loss or injury resulting from the contents of a message.




-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-08 Thread John Whittingham
On Thu, 8 May 2008 09:00:02 -0400, Paul Stenquist wrote
 The A2X-S is one of the best converters I've run across. And it will 
  at least transmit aperture information. Paul

Yes that's what I'm hoping for, but I can't help think that the *dedicated* 
Sigma EX converters would be a better choice.

What I'm really curious about is, if I cover the digital whateveritscalled 
pin (pin 7) do I still get AF, that could be useful with the 70-200/2.8 and 
1.4 EX. I'd probably switch to manual focus anyway using the 300/4 with 2x 
converters as the aperture would effectively be f/8, although in good light 
my MZ-3 would AF with 300/4 and 2x EX.

Regards,

John.



The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed and may contain
confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received an email in error 
please notify Carmel College
on [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete all copies of it from your systems.

Although Carmel College scans incoming and outgoing emails and email 
attachments for viruses we cannot
guarantee a communication to be free of all viruses nor accept any 
responsibility for viruses.

Although Carmel College monitors incoming and outgoing emails for inappropriate 
content, the college cannot
be held responsible for the views or expressions of the author.
The views expressed may not necessarily be those of Carmel College and Carmel 
College cannot be held
responsible for any loss or injury resulting from the contents of a message.




-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-08 Thread David Savage
2008/5/8 Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 Make that the A400/5.6 and the A2X-S converter. Damn keys:-).

Be honest...it's really the alcohol isn't it?

:-)

Cheers,

Dave

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-08 Thread Paul Stenquist
Not in the morning. At night it's the alcohol:-).
Paul
On May 8, 2008, at 9:46 AM, David Savage wrote:
 2008/5/8 Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 Make that the A400/5.6 and the A2X-S converter. Damn keys:-).

 Be honest...it's really the alcohol isn't it?

 :-)

 Cheers,

 Dave

 --  
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above  
 and follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-08 Thread mike wilson

 
 From: John Whittingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 I'd probably switch to manual focus anyway using the 300/4 with 2x 
 converters as the aperture would effectively be f/8, although in good light 
 my MZ-3 would AF with 300/4 and 2x EX.

They don't build 'em like that any more.


-
Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-08 Thread John Whittingham
On Thu, 8 May 2008 14:40:42 +, mike wilson wrote
  
  From: John Whittingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  I'd probably switch to manual focus anyway using the 300/4 with 2x 
  converters as the aperture would effectively be f/8, although in good 
light 
  my MZ-3 would AF with 300/4 and 2x EX.
 
 They don't build 'em like that any more.

You used to have to feed it some strange stuff, film they called it IIRC, 
cost a small fortune 8)

John



The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed and may contain
confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received an email in error 
please notify Carmel College
on [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete all copies of it from your systems.

Although Carmel College scans incoming and outgoing emails and email 
attachments for viruses we cannot
guarantee a communication to be free of all viruses nor accept any 
responsibility for viruses.

Although Carmel College monitors incoming and outgoing emails for inappropriate 
content, the college cannot
be held responsible for the views or expressions of the author.
The views expressed may not necessarily be those of Carmel College and Carmel 
College cannot be held
responsible for any loss or injury resulting from the contents of a message.




-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-08 Thread J. C. O'Connell
BECAUSE ON A FULL FRAME CAMERA YOUR IMAGE IS OVER TWICE AS BIG
AND YOU DONT HAVE TO ENLARGE IT NEARLY AS MUCH FOR THE SAME SIZE PRINT.
I.E. YOUR TOTAL LINES RECORDED EFFECTIVE INCREASE IN BOTH AXIS BY 50%
APS DEMANDS THE VERY FINEST LENSES FOR BEST RESULTS COMPARED TO FF
JCO

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
Stenquist
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 9:12 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D...yet!


Here's a shot with the A500/5.6 and the A2X-S converter on the K20D.  
Minor fringing in the background, but that could be fixed if I wasn't  
so lazy :-). Converters aren't perfect but the A2X-S is a very good  
one. And, despite what someone here said, it works just as well on  
APS-C as it does on a full frame film camera. Why wouldn't it? Paul
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7053676size=lg


On May 8, 2008, at 8:26 AM, John Whittingham wrote:
 On Thu, 08 May 2008 08:05:17 -0400, Mark Roberts wrote
 David Savage wrote:
 Those people are retarded.

 It's not Pentax's fault that an unsupported 3rd part accessory's
 doesn't
 work.

 It's not even the 3rd-party manufacturer's fault: The teleconverters 
 they're complaining about were designed before the shake reduction 
 system was even invented!

 Yeah, that's fare comment. The problem's been bugging me for a
 while and I
 stumbled across the thread whilst looking for  
 solutions..andthe red
 mist descended.

 I've got the A2X-S out this morning but I'm too busy the next few
 days to go
 and test things out.

 John

 --
 --

 The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom
 it is addressed and may contain
 confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received an  
 email in error please notify Carmel College
 on [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete all copies of it from your systems.

 Although Carmel College scans incoming and outgoing emails and
 email attachments for viruses we cannot
 guarantee a communication to be free of all viruses nor accept any  
 responsibility for viruses.

 Although Carmel College monitors incoming and outgoing emails for
 inappropriate content, the college cannot
 be held responsible for the views or expressions of the author.
 The views expressed may not necessarily be those of Carmel College  
 and Carmel College cannot be held
 responsible for any loss or injury resulting from the contents of a  
 message.

 --
 --


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above  
 and follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-08 Thread Scott Loveless
John Whittingham wrote:
 On Thu, 8 May 2008 14:40:42 +, mike wilson wrote
 From: John Whittingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 I'd probably switch to manual focus anyway using the 300/4 with 2x 
 converters as the aperture would effectively be f/8, although in good 
 light 
 my MZ-3 would AF with 300/4 and 2x EX.
 They don't build 'em like that any more.
 
 You used to have to feed it some strange stuff, film they called it IIRC, 
 cost a small fortune 8)
 
The good drugs always cost more.

-- 
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-08 Thread David Savage
2008/5/8 Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 John Whittingham wrote:
   You used to have to feed it some strange stuff, film they called it IIRC,
   cost a small fortune 8)
  
  The good drugs always cost more.

Scott you're still a young man with a bright future.

Just say no.

Cheers,

Dave

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-08 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
I use one with the A50/2.8 Macro to achieve 1:1 magnification and a  
bit more working space. It's a darn good converter.

Godfrey

On May 8, 2008, at 6:00 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:

 The A2X-S is one of the best converters I've run across. And it will
 at least transmit aperture information.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-08 Thread David J Brooks
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 7:11 PM, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 BTW: I noticed one of the regulars has posted a 359 x 536 pixel image to
 demonstrate how teleconverters don't degrade image quality. Gad, these
 people *are* worse the DP Review forum crowd...

I saw 1 post about a guy saying how poor his K10D was focusing. As i
am having some problems now, i had a look.

His posted image was at 1/4 second shutter speed, hand held, no SR,
with a long lens.

Then it hit me, stay here.:-)

Dave


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.




-- 
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
Ontario Canada

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-08 Thread Toralf Lund
Mark Roberts wrote:
 Bob Sullivan wrote:
   
 John,
 Several points...
 1) Don't buy some 3rd party lens and then whine about it not working.
 2) The Pentax A1.4X, A2.0X, and AF1.7X don't transmit focal lengths.
  You set them at the appropriate multiplied lengths.
  I've used the A200/4 and AF1.7X at a set 350mm focal length - works 
 great!
  This poster complaint about the K10D shows his ignorance or
 fictional usage.
 3) Maybe you should buy a point and shoot and give up on Pentax, maybe
 it's not for you.
 4) pentaxforums is a load of pond scum.  Read it if you want to be confused.
 

 6) Teleconverters are evil, anyway. (Yes, I sometimes use one myself, 
 but only as a last resort.)
   
7) Real Photographers don't use SR ;-)

- T

   


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-08 Thread Cotty
On 8/5/08, Toralf Lund, discombobulated, unleashed:

7) Real Photographers don't use SR ;-)

They use IS.

-- 


Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)  | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-08 Thread DagT
Den 8. mai. 2008 kl. 22.43 skrev Cotty:

 On 8/5/08, Toralf Lund, discombobulated, unleashed:

 7) Real Photographers don't use SR ;-)

 They use IS.

In that case they need it, as they can´t get any lens faster than 2.0  
with IS, and nothing better than 2.8 if you don´t have a lot of  
money .-)

DagT
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.



Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-08 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi

On May 8, 2008, at 1:54 PM, DagT wrote:

 Den 8. mai. 2008 kl. 22.43 skrev Cotty:

 On 8/5/08, Toralf Lund, discombobulated, unleashed:

 7) Real Photographers don't use SR ;-)

 They use IS.

 In that case they need it, as they can´t get any lens faster than 2.0
 with IS, and nothing better than 2.8 if you don´t have a lot of
 money .-)

One hardly needs IS with lenses of f/2 and faster speed, at least if  
they're not 150mm or longer.
One can't lift a 300mm f/2 lens anyway, so it will always be a tripod  
mounted lens and won't need IS either.

G
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-08 Thread Mark Roberts
Cotty wrote:
 On 8/5/08, Toralf Lund, discombobulated, unleashed:
 
 7) Real Photographers don't use SR ;-)
 
 They use IS.

Insufferable Snideness?
Increased Spending?
Illusions of Superiority?
Irrational Sensations?

I'm stumped.



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-08 Thread DagT
Den 8. mai. 2008 kl. 23.11 skrev Godfrey DiGiorgi:


 On May 8, 2008, at 1:54 PM, DagT wrote:

 Den 8. mai. 2008 kl. 22.43 skrev Cotty:

 On 8/5/08, Toralf Lund, discombobulated, unleashed:

 7) Real Photographers don't use SR ;-)

 They use IS.

 In that case they need it, as they can´t get any lens faster than 2.0
 with IS, and nothing better than 2.8 if you don´t have a lot of
 money .-)

 One hardly needs IS with lenses of f/2 and faster speed, at least if
 they're not 150mm or longer.
 One can't lift a 300mm f/2 lens anyway, so it will always be a tripod
 mounted lens and won't need IS either.

I disagree, or at least I find SR to be very useful with shorter  
lenses and wider apertures. My pug portrait last month was taken with  
FA50mm @ 1:1.4, hand held at 1/30s.  I also have sharp pictures taken  
without a tripod with DA14mm @ 1/4s
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=336893
and DA16-50 @ 16mm and 1/8s
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=353011

For me SR has been the most useful new feature since the image sensors.

DagT
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-08 Thread Fernando
DagT, Beautiful photos.

I agree on the 50/1.4, I found SR much useful too

On 5/8/08, DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Den 8. mai. 2008 kl. 23.11 skrev Godfrey DiGiorgi:

 
  On May 8, 2008, at 1:54 PM, DagT wrote:
 
  Den 8. mai. 2008 kl. 22.43 skrev Cotty:
 
  On 8/5/08, Toralf Lund, discombobulated, unleashed:
 
  7) Real Photographers don't use SR ;-)
 
  They use IS.
 
  In that case they need it, as they can´t get any lens faster than 2.0
  with IS, and nothing better than 2.8 if you don´t have a lot of
  money .-)
 
  One hardly needs IS with lenses of f/2 and faster speed, at least if
  they're not 150mm or longer.
  One can't lift a 300mm f/2 lens anyway, so it will always be a tripod
  mounted lens and won't need IS either.

 I disagree, or at least I find SR to be very useful with shorter
 lenses and wider apertures. My pug portrait last month was taken with
 FA50mm @ 1:1.4, hand held at 1/30s.  I also have sharp pictures taken
 without a tripod with DA14mm @ 1/4s
 http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=336893
 and DA16-50 @ 16mm and 1/8s
 http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=353011

 For me SR has been the most useful new feature since the image sensors.

 DagT
 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.



-- 

http://www.flickr.com/photos/ferand/

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-08 Thread Cotty
On 8/5/08, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:

Insufferable Snideness?
Increased Spending?
Illusions of Superiority?
Irrational Sensations?

I'm stumped.

Itinerant Snappers.

-- 


Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)  | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-08 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi

On May 8, 2008, at 2:23 PM, DagT wrote:

 One hardly needs IS with lenses of f/2 and faster speed, at least if
 they're not 150mm or longer.
 One can't lift a 300mm f/2 lens anyway, so it will always be a tripod
 mounted lens and won't need IS either.

 I disagree, or at least I find SR to be very useful with shorter
 lenses and wider apertures. My pug portrait last month was taken with
 FA50mm @ 1:1.4, hand held at 1/30s.  I also have sharp pictures taken
 without a tripod with DA14mm @ 1/4s
 http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=336893
 and DA16-50 @ 16mm and 1/8s
 http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=353011

 For me SR has been the most useful new feature since the image  
 sensors.

There's no argument about IS being useful. What I said was need ...  
it's not a necessity.

BTW, I've gotten good sharp photos with both the DA14 @ 1/4 second  
and a 50mm lens at 1/30 second hand-held without IS too. Can't tell  
the difference between them and with IS in many cases.

I *can* tell the difference when I put the camera on a tripod,  
however ...

Godfrey

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-08 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi

On May 8, 2008, at 2:32 PM, Cotty wrote:

 On 8/5/08, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:

 Insufferable Snideness?
 Increased Spending?
 Illusions of Superiority?
 Irrational Sensations?

 I'm stumped.

 Itinerant Snappers.

Itchy Sumbitches

G

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-08 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
BTW, Dag: really nice photos! :-)

G


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-08 Thread David J Brooks
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 8/5/08, Toralf Lund, discombobulated, unleashed:

7) Real Photographers don't use SR ;-)

 They use IS.

Sorry, VR.:-)

Dave

 --


 Cheers,
  Cotty


 ___/\__
 ||   (O)  | People, Places, Pastiche
 ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
 _



 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.




-- 
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
Ontario Canada

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-08 Thread Mark Roberts
Fernando wrote:
 DagT, Beautiful photos.
 
 I agree on the 50/1.4, I found SR much useful too

Well, if you want the depth-of-field that you get from f/1.4 or f/1.2 
you have to use an f/1.4 or f/1.2 lens. And SR is still nice then 
because it lets you shoot in low light and/or low ISO.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-08 Thread David J Brooks
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Cotty wrote:
 On 8/5/08, Toralf Lund, discombobulated, unleashed:

 7) Real Photographers don't use SR ;-)

 They use IS.

 Insufferable Snideness?
 Increased Spending?
 Illusions of Superiority?
 Irrational Sensations?

 I'm stumped.

THATS IT.

Dave



 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.




-- 
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
Ontario Canada

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-08 Thread P. J. Alling
Yep, TCs suck big time, why there's almost no detail in this shot and 
it's so soft that I can just barely make out the bird

http://www.mindspring.com/~distilfink/PESO%20--%20theegretislanding.html

John Whittingham wrote:
 On Thu, 8 May 2008 04:21:10 -0400, J. C. O'Connell wrote
   
 I bet the reason why is because TCs suck in general and really suck 
 the big one on APS sensored cameras. jco
 

 mwahahaha.. 8)


 

 The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom it is 
 addressed and may contain
 confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received an email in 
 error please notify Carmel College
 on [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete all copies of it from your systems.

 Although Carmel College scans incoming and outgoing emails and email 
 attachments for viruses we cannot
 guarantee a communication to be free of all viruses nor accept any 
 responsibility for viruses.

 Although Carmel College monitors incoming and outgoing emails for 
 inappropriate content, the college cannot
 be held responsible for the views or expressions of the author.
 The views expressed may not necessarily be those of Carmel College and Carmel 
 College cannot be held
 responsible for any loss or injury resulting from the contents of a message.

 


   


-- 
Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil...
   -- Dr. Jerry Pournelle 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-08 Thread P. J. Alling
P. J. Alling wrote:
 Yep, TCs suck big time, why there's almost no detail in this shot and 
 it's so soft that I can just barely make out the bird
   

Perhaps I should have mentioned that this was shot with the A* 300 f4.0 
and the AF 1.7x adapter, for those who don't remember or never saw it to 
begin with.
 http://www.mindspring.com/~distilfink/PESO%20--%20theegretislanding.html

 John Whittingham wrote:
   
 On Thu, 8 May 2008 04:21:10 -0400, J. C. O'Connell wrote
   
 
 I bet the reason why is because TCs suck in general and really suck 
 the big one on APS sensored cameras. jco
 
   
 mwahahaha.. 8)


 

 The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom it is 
 addressed and may contain
 confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received an email in 
 error please notify Carmel College
 on [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete all copies of it from your systems.

 Although Carmel College scans incoming and outgoing emails and email 
 attachments for viruses we cannot
 guarantee a communication to be free of all viruses nor accept any 
 responsibility for viruses.

 Although Carmel College monitors incoming and outgoing emails for 
 inappropriate content, the college cannot
 be held responsible for the views or expressions of the author.
 The views expressed may not necessarily be those of Carmel College and 
 Carmel College cannot be held
 responsible for any loss or injury resulting from the contents of a message.

 


   
 


   


-- 
Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil...
   -- Dr. Jerry Pournelle 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-08 Thread P. J. Alling
Nope, if your cover the digital pin you get an A lens, as far as Pentax 
DSLRs are concerned.

John Whittingham wrote:
 On Thu, 8 May 2008 09:00:02 -0400, Paul Stenquist wrote
   
 The A2X-S is one of the best converters I've run across. And it will 
  at least transmit aperture information. Paul
 

 Yes that's what I'm hoping for, but I can't help think that the *dedicated* 
 Sigma EX converters would be a better choice.

 What I'm really curious about is, if I cover the digital whateveritscalled 
 pin (pin 7) do I still get AF, that could be useful with the 70-200/2.8 and 
 1.4 EX. I'd probably switch to manual focus anyway using the 300/4 with 2x 
 converters as the aperture would effectively be f/8, although in good light 
 my MZ-3 would AF with 300/4 and 2x EX.

 Regards,

 John.

 

 The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom it is 
 addressed and may contain
 confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received an email in 
 error please notify Carmel College
 on [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete all copies of it from your systems.

 Although Carmel College scans incoming and outgoing emails and email 
 attachments for viruses we cannot
 guarantee a communication to be free of all viruses nor accept any 
 responsibility for viruses.

 Although Carmel College monitors incoming and outgoing emails for 
 inappropriate content, the college cannot
 be held responsible for the views or expressions of the author.
 The views expressed may not necessarily be those of Carmel College and Carmel 
 College cannot be held
 responsible for any loss or injury resulting from the contents of a message.

 


   


-- 
Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil...
   -- Dr. Jerry Pournelle 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-08 Thread mike wilson

 
 From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: 2008/05/08 Thu PM 09:56:35 GMT
 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
 Subject: Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D...yet!
 
 
 On May 8, 2008, at 2:32 PM, Cotty wrote:
 
  On 8/5/08, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
 
  Insufferable Snideness?
  Increased Spending?
  Illusions of Superiority?
  Irrational Sensations?
 
  I'm stumped.
 
  Itinerant Snappers.
 
 Itchy Sumbitches

Integrated spasticity.


-
Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-07 Thread Mark Roberts
John Whittingham wrote:
 http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-dslr-discussion/24491-k20d-
 teleconverters.html

Wow. I take back everything I've ever said about DP Review people being 
neurotic!


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-07 Thread Scott Loveless
Mark Roberts wrote:
 John Whittingham wrote:
 http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-dslr-discussion/24491-k20d-
 teleconverters.html
 
 Wow. I take back everything I've ever said about DP Review people being 
 neurotic!
 
 
Holy cow!  Somebody tell JCO.

-- 
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-07 Thread Bob Sullivan
John,
Several points...
1) Don't buy some 3rd party lens and then whine about it not working.
2) The Pentax A1.4X, A2.0X, and AF1.7X don't transmit focal lengths.
 You set them at the appropriate multiplied lengths.
 I've used the A200/4 and AF1.7X at a set 350mm focal length - works great!
 This poster complaint about the K10D shows his ignorance or
fictional usage.
3) Maybe you should buy a point and shoot and give up on Pentax, maybe
it's not for you.
4) pentaxforums is a load of pond scum.  Read it if you want to be confused.
Regards,  Bob S.

On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 2:31 PM, John Whittingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-dslr-discussion/24491-k20d-
 teleconverters.html

 John


 

 The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom it is 
 addressed and may contain
 confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received an email in 
 error please notify Carmel College
 on [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete all copies of it from your systems.

 Although Carmel College scans incoming and outgoing emails and email 
 attachments for viruses we cannot
 guarantee a communication to be free of all viruses nor accept any 
 responsibility for viruses.

 Although Carmel College monitors incoming and outgoing emails for 
 inappropriate content, the college cannot
 be held responsible for the views or expressions of the author.
 The views expressed may not necessarily be those of Carmel College and Carmel 
 College cannot be held
 responsible for any loss or injury resulting from the contents of a message.

 


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-07 Thread P. J. Alling
They're complaining about a third party TC?   Dorks!

John Whittingham wrote:
 http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-dslr-discussion/24491-k20d-
 teleconverters.html

 John 


 

 The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom it is 
 addressed and may contain
 confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received an email in 
 error please notify Carmel College
 on [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete all copies of it from your systems.

 Although Carmel College scans incoming and outgoing emails and email 
 attachments for viruses we cannot
 guarantee a communication to be free of all viruses nor accept any 
 responsibility for viruses.

 Although Carmel College monitors incoming and outgoing emails for 
 inappropriate content, the college cannot
 be held responsible for the views or expressions of the author.
 The views expressed may not necessarily be those of Carmel College and Carmel 
 College cannot be held
 responsible for any loss or injury resulting from the contents of a message.

 


   


-- 
Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil...
   -- Dr. Jerry Pournelle 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-07 Thread Mark Roberts
Bob Sullivan wrote:
 John,
 Several points...
 1) Don't buy some 3rd party lens and then whine about it not working.
 2) The Pentax A1.4X, A2.0X, and AF1.7X don't transmit focal lengths.
  You set them at the appropriate multiplied lengths.
  I've used the A200/4 and AF1.7X at a set 350mm focal length - works 
 great!
  This poster complaint about the K10D shows his ignorance or
 fictional usage.
 3) Maybe you should buy a point and shoot and give up on Pentax, maybe
 it's not for you.
 4) pentaxforums is a load of pond scum.  Read it if you want to be confused.

6) Teleconverters are evil, anyway. (Yes, I sometimes use one myself, 
but only as a last resort.)


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-07 Thread Paul Stenquist
And your point? Same as the K10D. It won't transfer teleconverter  
information. But that's because all Pentax teleconverters are  
basically dumb. But I use one all the time with my A400/5.6. I just  
dial in the number manually. I still get shake reduction, and I don't  
really want autofocus with long lenses. It's relatively useless for  
most long lens applications. Pentax forum posts are generally written  
in dumbspeak and have to be translated.
Paul

On May 7, 2008, at 3:31 PM, John Whittingham wrote:
 http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-dslr-discussion/24491-k20d-
 teleconverters.html

 John


 -- 
 --

 The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom  
 it is addressed and may contain
 confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received an  
 email in error please notify Carmel College
 on [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete all copies of it from your systems.

 Although Carmel College scans incoming and outgoing emails and  
 email attachments for viruses we cannot
 guarantee a communication to be free of all viruses nor accept any  
 responsibility for viruses.

 Although Carmel College monitors incoming and outgoing emails for  
 inappropriate content, the college cannot
 be held responsible for the views or expressions of the author.
 The views expressed may not necessarily be those of Carmel College  
 and Carmel College cannot be held
 responsible for any loss or injury resulting from the contents of a  
 message.

 -- 
 --


 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above  
 and follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-07 Thread P. J. Alling
Actually the Pentax Forum Trogs are complaining because a /Thrid Party/ 
autofocusing TC is smart enough to pass on the digital data but not 
smart enough to convert the FL data when it does.  They can't dial in 
the FL because the camera already ha it.  However I cannot see how that 
is Pentax's fault.  It's the fault of the TC maker.

Paul Stenquist wrote:
 And your point? Same as the K10D. It won't transfer teleconverter  
 information. But that's because all Pentax teleconverters are  
 basically dumb. But I use one all the time with my A400/5.6. I just  
 dial in the number manually. I still get shake reduction, and I don't  
 really want autofocus with long lenses. It's relatively useless for  
 most long lens applications. Pentax forum posts are generally written  
 in dumbspeak and have to be translated.
 Paul

 On May 7, 2008, at 3:31 PM, John Whittingham wrote:
   
 http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-dslr-discussion/24491-k20d-
 teleconverters.html

 John


 -- 
 --

 The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom  
 it is addressed and may contain
 confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received an  
 email in error please notify Carmel College
 on [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete all copies of it from your systems.

 Although Carmel College scans incoming and outgoing emails and  
 email attachments for viruses we cannot
 guarantee a communication to be free of all viruses nor accept any  
 responsibility for viruses.

 Although Carmel College monitors incoming and outgoing emails for  
 inappropriate content, the college cannot
 be held responsible for the views or expressions of the author.
 The views expressed may not necessarily be those of Carmel College  
 and Carmel College cannot be held
 responsible for any loss or injury resulting from the contents of a  
 message.

 -- 
 --


 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above  
 and follow the directions.
 


   


-- 
Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil...
   -- Dr. Jerry Pournelle 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-07 Thread John Francis
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 03:45:15PM -0500, Bob Sullivan wrote:
 John,
 Several points...
 1) Don't buy some 3rd party lens and then whine about it not working.

Quite.  The K10D (and K20D, I assume) work just fine with every piece
of Pentax equipment I own, including the TCs (A1.4, A2.0, and AF 1.7),
albeit at a loss of auto-focus capabilities, and with manual setting
of the focal length for SR (which is tedious for zoom lenses).

If I use my Sigma TCs I can keep AF (haven't experimented with any SDM
lenses yet, though), but I have to turn off SR (or live with the fact
that SR will compensate based on the wrong focal length).  C'est la vie.



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-07 Thread William Robb

- Original Message - 
From: John Whittingham
Subject: Why I won't be buying a K20D...yet!


 http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-dslr-discussion/24491-k20d-
 teleconverters.html

I guess I'm just lucky. I use neither teleconverters or zoom lenses, except on 
very rare 
occassions, and those times I have a tripod under the rig.
What a bunch of babbling noncompoops.

William Robb 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-07 Thread William Robb

- Original Message - 
From: Bob Sullivan
Subject: Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D...yet!



 4) pentaxforums is a load of pond scum.  Read it if you want to be confused.

Nah, I'm redirecting the vitriol I used to reserve for Alling and O'Connell 
onto those dorks. 
It's very refreshing.

William Robb 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-07 Thread Mark Roberts
William Robb wrote:
 - Original Message - 
 From: Bob Sullivan
 
 4) pentaxforums is a load of pond scum.  Read it if you want to be confused.
 
 Nah, I'm redirecting the vitriol I used to reserve for Alling and O'Connell 
 onto those dorks. 
 It's very refreshing.

Good show, William!

BTW: I noticed one of the regulars has posted a 359 x 536 pixel image to 
demonstrate how teleconverters don't degrade image quality. Gad, these 
people *are* worse the DP Review forum crowd...


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-07 Thread William Robb

- Original Message - 
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D...yet!




 Good show, William!

I've been feeling really pent up lately. I probably haven't picked a fight with 
anyone for a 
year or more.


 BTW: I noticed one of the regulars has posted a 359 x 536 pixel image to
 demonstrate how teleconverters don't degrade image quality. Gad, these
 people *are* worse the DP Review forum crowd...

Everything is sharp at that size.

William Robb 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Why I won't be buying a K20D.......yet!

2008-05-07 Thread David Savage
Those people are retarded.

It's not Pentax's fault that an unsupported 3rd part accessory's doesn't work.

Cheers,

Dave

2008/5/8 John Whittingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-dslr-discussion/24491-k20d-
  teleconverters.html

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.