RE: Horrible person.

2001-03-30 Thread Peter Smith

Jody wrote:

 I like to take good photos, not crappy touristy shots.

Fair enough

 Also I like maximum control over my settings. That is
 why I use an SLR. I am glad some people still agree
 with me that you can't beat SLR.

I agree that at present SLRs from the big 4 (5?) manufacturers give better
value for money in bang for buck terms. At a similar price to any MZ/ZX
series SLR the digital camera would lose out in creative picture taking
facilities. (unless of course your prime requirement is a digital image)

 As for going digital,
 I would probably buy a scanner instead, so I can share
 my wonderful SLR photos, not some crap.

Now we start to disagree.  Digital is not BAD per se. Digital image
recording is only "another" way of recording light transmitted through a
lens.  An alternative to chemical based film.

 Try doing a
 good close-up with a digital, or a PS for that
 matter.

Not so - A friend recently bought a Nikon Coolpix 990 (I think that is the
number) - it has amazing macro ability.  I don't like the camera, it handles
like a pig and battery life is dismal, but give me the digital technology in
a Pentax SLR and I for one will be grateful.  Don't get caught in the trap
of equating digital to poor quality.  At present X quality digital photo
gear is more expensive than X quality film gear but it is changing fast in
favour of digital.  Look at some of the top end digital cameras being
released - they are very capable beasts - just very expensive and outside
the sensible budget of the average amateur enthusiastic image capturer.
We're all aware of the benefits of digital images - my next purchase will
probably be a film scanner.  I used to have a black and white darkroom in my
previous house (17 yrs ago) but I'm looking forward to being able to create
similar results in my "light room" in the near future.

Peter



-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Horrible person.

2001-03-29 Thread Bigtoeno2
 "Pentax, Minolta and Olympus. I would lump all ofthese manufactures 
together. They are not really builtto the same quality as Canon and Nikon. If 
you chooseprime, fixed focal length lenses though they arecapable of superb 
results. Remember I am looking forequipment capable of the absolute best 
imaging, sovery few other people would be quite as demanding as Iam. It must 
be said a friend of mine, who is aprofessional fashion photographer, uses a 
Pentax LXwith pentax prime lenses and his pictures are quitesuperb." 

What this guy is saying is that if you want sloppy one-button photography 
with 15mm to 1200mm do-all zooms...then don't use pentax...go for the "good 
guys" of C and N. But he then says if you like good quality pictures, then 
pentax isn't so bad after all.

Pentax kind of reminds me of a slogan i saw on a pair of blue jeans i got 
yesterday (as all of the foreign language speakers here wonder why in english 
one pant is referred to as a pairwierd our language is). Anyway...the 
slogan was "Quality never goes out of style"...and that is trademarked and 
all that stuff by the way.

brent


Re: Horrible person.

2001-03-29 Thread Tonghang Zhou

On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, petit miam wrote:
 Quoted from
 http://www.photographystore.com/Pages/camrabg.html

 "Pentax, Minolta and Olympus. I would lump all of
 these manufactures together. They are not really built
 to the same quality as Canon and Nikon. If you choose
 prime, fixed focal length lenses though they are
 capable of superb results. Remember I am looking for
 equipment capable of the absolute best imaging, so

There is some truth in his ranting, except the list
should expand to include Canon and Nikon as well.
Some of consumer zooms are pathetic indeed.  Even
some cameras (look at Canon Rebelxx for instance.)
They don't offer better pictures than many PS
cameras but cost much more and are complex, heavy
and unwieldy.  To the mass consumer, the SLR's
they encounter at WalMart or Wolf Camera are
decidedly unattractive.

No wonder SLR as a whole is loosing it.  If you can't
afford a good digital which you will update annually
like computers, then buy a cheap PS (Yashica T4,
Olympus stylus, etc.)  Or if you really like
photography, go to medium format.  That's my ranting.
Now I feel better.

Tonghang.

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .