Re: OT: Gawker debacle

2010-12-28 Thread John Sessoms

From: steve harley


On 2010-12-26 21:52 , John Sessoms wrote:

> I did not have an account. Someone else used my email address to create
> an account.

ah, i suppose that's possible, but if you're sure that's the case, there
was no threat to any other account you hold




I did not find out that was the case until after I had already done what 
I had to do to protect my accounts without knowing which if any had been 
compromised. Gawker would not provide me the information I needed to 
determine the threat.


The warning emails were from the 12th & 13th of December, already 10 
days old when I got home from my trip.


After I had changed passwords on all of my accounts, I installed 
software to download the torrent file posted by the hackers ... because 
I could not get any assistance from Gawker.


That's how I finally learned Gawker allowed someone else to use my email 
address to open an account on their site.



What I don't have is any explanation from Gawker why they would allow
> someone to create an account using my email address and not verify the
> registrant's right to use my email address.


i don't recall all the sites Gawker has, but some of them have been
around for several years, possibly predating the prevalence of account
verification via email; afaik there is no law that states a website must
verify email addresses used to create accounts; some sites still allow
posting comments with an email address that is never verified


There is however, IIRC, a section of the telecommunications act baring 
fraudulent misuse of another persons electronic communications, 
including using someone else's email address without that person's 
permission.


And in this case, it's not merely the posting of comments, but allowing 
someone to open an account with the site using a falsified email address.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: OT: Gawker debacle

2010-12-28 Thread John Sessoms

Doesn't sound like a lot of fun. Nor am I confident I can make the case.

I do think I can make a case with a criminal complaint for them using my 
email address fraudulently which is what I intend.


From: Walter Gilbert


Maybe you should contact this guy: 
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2010/12/26/national/a113305S63.DTL
 -- Walt On 12/26/2010 8:59 PM, John Sessoms wrote:


> I mentioned that when I got home from my trip I found several emails
> in my inbox indicating that my "Gawker account" was compromised. Funny
> thing about it was I didn't even know I had a "Gawker account".
>
> But I followed up using the tools recommended and sure enough my email
> address came up as one of those compromised.
>
> I couldn't get any other information about this "Gawker account" to
> help me figure out which if any of my passwords might be compromised,
> so I've ended up changing every password for any online account
> associated with my email address.
>
> Still couldn't get any help from Gawker, other than advice to change
> the password on my "Gawker account" ... which I still didn't know
> anything about.
>
> After a lot of digging and flailing around, including installing a
> torrent viewer so I could download the file the hackers published
> online with the information from Gawker's user database in order to
> search it for my email address, I discovered that I indeed do not have
> a "Gawker account".
>
> Someone else has a Gawker account using my email address that I knew
> nothing about, and Gawker could not be bothered to verify the email.
>
> I'm really pissed.
>
> As far as I'm concerned, Gawker behaved negligently allowing someone
> else to use my email address as identification; allowing a someone to
> register an account with my email address and failing to verify the
> email or obtain my permission to use my email address for that account.
>
> They have inconvenienced me and done me grievous harm by their
> negligence.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: OT: Gawker debacle

2010-12-26 Thread steve harley

On 2010-12-26 21:52 , John Sessoms wrote:

I did not have an account. Someone else used my email address to create
an account.


ah, i suppose that's possible, but if you're sure that's the case, there 
was no threat to any other account you hold




What I don't have is any explanation from Gawker why they would allow
someone to create an account using my email address and not verify the
registrant's right to use my email address.


i don't recall all the sites Gawker has, but some of them have been 
around for several years, possibly predating the prevalence of account 
verification via email; afaik there is no law that states a website must 
verify email addresses used to create accounts; some sites still allow 
posting comments with an email address that is never verified





--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: OT: Gawker debacle

2010-12-26 Thread Boris Liberman

On 12/27/2010 6:56 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:

Northeastern University continues to send me emails urging me to check
the status of my application to their MBA program.  Except I never did
such.  Some fool doesn't even know his own email address and has
mistakenly entered mine.  I contacted the school once, but the
messages are still coming and I'm done.  They are spam now.  I suppose
you don't deserve an MBA if you can't figure out what your email
address is.
Regards,  Bob S.


In Israel they recently made it a serious offense to keep sending 
soliciting information to a person after the person specifically 
requested not to do so. It includes electronic means of communication.


One of the local colleges for some reason decided that I ought to do a 
degree with them. Once I politely mentioned on the phone that I both 
have my degree (MSc in Computer Science, thank you so much) and that I 
am aware of the fact that they are soliciting against my explicitly 
expressed will, they stopped bugging me...


Boris

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: OT: Gawker debacle

2010-12-26 Thread Walter Gilbert

   Maybe you should contact this guy:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2010/12/26/national/a113305S63.DTL

-- Walt

On 12/26/2010 8:59 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
I mentioned that when I got home from my trip I found several emails 
in my inbox indicating that my "Gawker account" was compromised. Funny 
thing about it was I didn't even know I had a "Gawker account".


But I followed up using the tools recommended and sure enough my email 
address came up as one of those compromised.


I couldn't get any other information about this "Gawker account" to 
help me figure out which if any of my passwords might be compromised, 
so I've ended up changing every password for any online account 
associated with my email address.


Still couldn't get any help from Gawker, other than advice to change 
the password on my "Gawker account" ... which I still didn't know 
anything about.


After a lot of digging and flailing around, including installing a 
torrent viewer so I could download the file the hackers published 
online with the information from Gawker's user database in order to 
search it for my email address, I discovered that I indeed do not have 
a "Gawker account".


Someone else has a Gawker account using my email address that I knew 
nothing about, and Gawker could not be bothered to verify the email.


I'm really pissed.

As far as I'm concerned, Gawker behaved negligently allowing someone 
else to use my email address as identification; allowing a someone to 
register an account with my email address and failing to verify the 
email or obtain my permission to use my email address for that account.


They have inconvenienced me and done me grievous harm by their 
negligence.





--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: OT: Gawker debacle

2010-12-26 Thread Bob Sullivan
Northeastern University continues to send me emails urging me to check
the status of my application to their MBA program.  Except I never did
such.  Some fool doesn't even know his own email address and has
mistakenly entered mine.  I contacted the school once, but the
messages are still coming and I'm done.  They are spam now.  I suppose
you don't deserve an MBA if you can't figure out what your email
address is.
Regards,  Bob S.

On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 8:59 PM, John Sessoms  wrote:
> I mentioned that when I got home from my trip I found several emails in my
> inbox indicating that my "Gawker account" was compromised. Funny thing about
> it was I didn't even know I had a "Gawker account".
>
> But I followed up using the tools recommended and sure enough my email
> address came up as one of those compromised.
>
> I couldn't get any other information about this "Gawker account" to help me
> figure out which if any of my passwords might be compromised, so I've ended
> up changing every password for any online account associated with my email
> address.
>
> Still couldn't get any help from Gawker, other than advice to change the
> password on my "Gawker account" ... which I still didn't know anything
> about.
>
> After a lot of digging and flailing around, including installing a torrent
> viewer so I could download the file the hackers published online with the
> information from Gawker's user database in order to search it for my email
> address, I discovered that I indeed do not have a "Gawker account".
>
> Someone else has a Gawker account using my email address that I knew nothing
> about, and Gawker could not be bothered to verify the email.
>
> I'm really pissed.
>
> As far as I'm concerned, Gawker behaved negligently allowing someone else to
> use my email address as identification; allowing a someone to register an
> account with my email address and failing to verify the email or obtain my
> permission to use my email address for that account.
>
> They have inconvenienced me and done me grievous harm by their negligence.
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
>

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: OT: Gawker debacle

2010-12-26 Thread John Sessoms

From: steve harley


On 2010-12-26 19:59 , John Sessoms wrote:

> I mentioned that when I got home from my trip I found several emails in
> my inbox indicating that my "Gawker account" was compromised. Funny
> thing about it was I didn't even know I had a "Gawker account".

Gawker runs numerous websites; examples are Gizmodo & Lifehacker --
those are the two where i had signed up at some point to leave a comment
or something; all the email addresses and passwords at all Gawker's
sites were stolen; if had such an account and you used the same password
somewhere else, someone may try too log in as you; they will try the
easy guesses (Facebook, Twitter, Google) and/or the sites where there is
something to gain (Paypal, banking sites)


I did not have an account. Someone else used my email address to create 
an account. Gawker did not verify that person's right to use my email 
address to create their account.


A simple verification email to me to confirm that I was indeed the 
person creating the account would have stopped the whole mess. Gawker 
did not do that.


Unfortunately, I could not get any information from Gawker other than my 
email address and the account password associated with it were 
compromised. They gave me no help to determine the severity of the breach.


As a result of Gawker's negligence, I had to take measures to protect my 
own security.


I already had strong individual passwords on all of the accounts 
associated with my email address. Now I have stronger individual 
passwords for every account associated with my email address.


What I don't have is any explanation from Gawker why they would allow 
someone to create an account using my email address and not verify the 
registrant's right to use my email address.


As far as I'm concerned that's criminal negligence on Gawker's part.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: OT: Gawker debacle

2010-12-26 Thread steve harley

On 2010-12-26 19:59 , John Sessoms wrote:

I mentioned that when I got home from my trip I found several emails in
my inbox indicating that my "Gawker account" was compromised. Funny
thing about it was I didn't even know I had a "Gawker account".


Gawker runs numerous websites; examples are Gizmodo & Lifehacker -- 
those are the two where i had signed up at some point to leave a comment 
or something; all the email addresses and passwords at all Gawker's 
sites were stolen; if had such an account and you used the same password 
somewhere else, someone may try too log in as you; they will try the 
easy guesses (Facebook, Twitter, Google) and/or the sites where there is 
something to gain (Paypal, banking sites)


instead of changing all your passwords to one something else, i'd use 
this opportunity to set up a different password at every site; the tool 
i use is 1Password, but there are many others to choose from; since i 
have used tools like this for years, i don't really care that my Gizmodo 
and Lifehacker passwords were stolen -- they can't use that info to get 
into any other site




--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: OT: Gawker debacle

2010-12-26 Thread Cory Waters

That's the internet for ya.
CW


On 12/26/2010 9:59 PM, John Sessoms wrote:

I mentioned that when I got home from my trip I found several emails in
my inbox indicating that my "Gawker account" was compromised. Funny
thing about it was I didn't even know I had a "Gawker account".

But I followed up using the tools recommended and sure enough my email
address came up as one of those compromised.

I couldn't get any other information about this "Gawker account" to help
me figure out which if any of my passwords might be compromised, so I've
ended up changing every password for any online account associated with
my email address.

Still couldn't get any help from Gawker, other than advice to change the
password on my "Gawker account" ... which I still didn't know anything
about.

After a lot of digging and flailing around, including installing a
torrent viewer so I could download the file the hackers published online
with the information from Gawker's user database in order to search it
for my email address, I discovered that I indeed do not have a "Gawker
account".

Someone else has a Gawker account using my email address that I knew
nothing about, and Gawker could not be bothered to verify the email.

I'm really pissed.

As far as I'm concerned, Gawker behaved negligently allowing someone
else to use my email address as identification; allowing a someone to
register an account with my email address and failing to verify the
email or obtain my permission to use my email address for that account.

They have inconvenienced me and done me grievous harm by their negligence.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.