Re: PESO: 50's Creamer

2007-02-09 Thread Mark Cassino
I like it. I agree with Marne that the creamer is pushing too close to 
the bottom of the frame, but I like the basic sense of form, light, and 
shadow here.

I'm tempted to say get lower wrt the creamer, but I'm not sure. I once 
shot a couple hundred ceramic pots as a favor for a ceramics instructor 
to document the  final projects from his class. My first instinct was to 
get low on the subject, but then you lose the shape and form of the 
opening of the piece. So maybe a little lower and little bit back... but 
nice shot.

- MCC

Jack Davis wrote:
 Sorting through some secondary slide storage, I came across this and
 found that I still consider some of its shapes pleasing.
 Guess it doesn't matter where you find them.
 
 Jack
 
 Comments welcome!
 
 http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=217
 
 
 
 
  
 
 No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go 
 with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started.
 http://mobile.yahoo.com/mail 
 


-- 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mark Cassino Photography
Kalamazoo, Michigan
www.markcassino.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: PESO: 50's Creamer

2007-02-09 Thread Jack Davis
Thanks, Mark,
You hit it exactly. My featured element was the mouth or opening of the
creamer. I tried lower, but the shadow began to narrow so moved back
up. I've printed the Shadow somewhat lighter and like it either way.
It is too tight on the lower left, but when I checked the slide, I
verified the the scanner had gotten it all. The framing just got away
from me.

Thanks for your thoughts!

Jack
--- Mark Cassino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I like it. I agree with Marne that the creamer is pushing too close
 to 
 the bottom of the frame, but I like the basic sense of form, light,
 and 
 shadow here.
 
 I'm tempted to say get lower wrt the creamer, but I'm not sure. I
 once 
 shot a couple hundred ceramic pots as a favor for a ceramics
 instructor 
 to document the  final projects from his class. My first instinct was
 to 
 get low on the subject, but then you lose the shape and form of the 
 opening of the piece. So maybe a little lower and little bit back...
 but 
 nice shot.
 
 - MCC
 
 Jack Davis wrote:
  Sorting through some secondary slide storage, I came across this
 and
  found that I still consider some of its shapes pleasing.
  Guess it doesn't matter where you find them.
  
  Jack
  
  Comments welcome!
  
  http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=217
  
  
  
  
   
 


  No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go 
  with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started.
  http://mobile.yahoo.com/mail 
  
 
 
 -- 
 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 Mark Cassino Photography
 Kalamazoo, Michigan
 www.markcassino.com
 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 



 

Looking for earth-friendly autos? 
Browse Top Cars by Green Rating at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center.
http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: PESO: 50's Creamer

2007-02-04 Thread David J Brooks
I like this one.

Nice and sharp, good comp and exposure.

Dave

On 1/31/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Sorting through some secondary slide storage, I came across this and
 found that I still consider some of its shapes pleasing.
 Guess it doesn't matter where you find them.

 Jack

 Comments welcome!

 http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=217





 
 No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go
 with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started.
 http://mobile.yahoo.com/mail

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net



-- 
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
Ontario Canada

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: PESO: 50's Creamer

2007-02-04 Thread Jack Davis
Thanks, Ann,
You've pretty much summarized my 'secret' feelings about it. For me,
It's an aesthetically pleasing nudge recalled from a good place.

Jack
--- ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I think you are being too hard on yourself about it -
 I like it quite a bit the way it is - I think the shadow and the
 creamer 
 are well balanced,
 I like the Southwest feel to it - the old look of the (then) new 
 pottery.  Just a simple
 and pleasant photo - rather painterly.
 
 ann
 
 
 Jack Davis wrote:
 
 Sorting through some secondary slide storage, I came across this and
 found that I still consider some of its shapes pleasing.
 Guess it doesn't matter where you find them.
 
 Jack
 
 Comments welcome!
 
 http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=217
 
 
 
 
  


 No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go 
 with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started.
 http://mobile.yahoo.com/mail 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 



 

Be a PS3 game guru.
Get your game face on with the latest PS3 news and previews at Yahoo! Games.
http://videogames.yahoo.com/platform?platform=120121

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: PESO: 50's Creamer

2007-02-04 Thread Jack Davis
Appreciate it, David.

Jack
--- David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I like this one.
 
 Nice and sharp, good comp and exposure.
 
 Dave
 
 On 1/31/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Sorting through some secondary slide storage, I came across this
 and
  found that I still consider some of its shapes pleasing.
  Guess it doesn't matter where you find them.
 
  Jack
 
  Comments welcome!
 
  http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=217
 
 
 
 
 
 


  No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go
  with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started.
  http://mobile.yahoo.com/mail
 
  --
  PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
  PDML@pdml.net
  http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 
 
 
 -- 
 Equine Photography
 www.caughtinmotion.com
 Ontario Canada
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 



 

No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go 
with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/mail 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: PESO: 50's Creamer

2007-02-03 Thread ann sanfedele
I think you are being too hard on yourself about it -
I like it quite a bit the way it is - I think the shadow and the creamer 
are well balanced,
I like the Southwest feel to it - the old look of the (then) new 
pottery.  Just a simple
and pleasant photo - rather painterly.

ann


Jack Davis wrote:

Sorting through some secondary slide storage, I came across this and
found that I still consider some of its shapes pleasing.
Guess it doesn't matter where you find them.

Jack

Comments welcome!

http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=217




 

No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go 
with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/mail 

  




-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: PESO: 50's Creamer

2007-02-01 Thread Jack Davis
So you'll know where I am on this, I consider it sort of a playful
attempt at cute. The form of the mouth, its total stance and shadow I
find pleasing. FTR, I don't feel it's a 'strong' image.
I have absolutely no emotional investment in it and guarantee that I'll
find no comment offensive. Just curious as to what it may elicit.
It won't come up again.

Jack
--- Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Sorting through some secondary slide storage, I came across this and
 found that I still consider some of its shapes pleasing.
 Guess it doesn't matter where you find them.
 
 Jack
 
 Comments welcome!
 
 http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=217
 
 
 
 
  


 No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go 
 with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started.
 http://mobile.yahoo.com/mail 
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 



 

Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection. 
Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta.
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/features_spam.html

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: PESO: 50's Creamer

2007-02-01 Thread Eactivist
In a message dated 2/1/2007 6:40:29 A.M. Pacific  Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So you'll know where I am on this,  I consider it sort of a playful
attempt at cute. The form of the mouth, its  total stance and shadow I
find pleasing. FTR, I don't feel it's a 'strong'  image.
I have absolutely no emotional investment in it and guarantee that  I'll
find no comment offensive. Just curious as to what it may elicit.
It  won't come up again.

Jack
--- Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:

 Sorting through some secondary slide storage, I came across  this and
 found that I still consider some of its shapes  pleasing.
 Guess it doesn't matter where you find them.
 
  Jack
 
 Comments welcome!
 
  http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=217


Oh,  in that case... ;-)

The bottom edge of the creamer is too close to the  bottom edge of the 
picture. 

Actually, I feel this MIGHT be an  interesting subject and background, but I 
don't think you got the best angle on  it. Something a little closer, a little 
lower down, or something, I feel could  have made it cuter.

Marnie aka Doe :-)  


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: PESO: 50's Creamer

2007-02-01 Thread Jack Davis
Thanks, Marne. Yesterday, after scanning, I checked the bottom edge to
see if the scanner had cropped the bottom a bit, but found it hadn't.
IOW, I agree.
I got an off-list critique which included the suggestion that the
shadow might be too strong. I considered the shadow to be a major
element, and found the camera needed a higher angle to give it a form I
liked.
This slide has gone back into its secondary storage crypt where it is
likely to spend eternity. 
These comments may read like a criticism of your remarks..they're NOT.
Sincerely appreciate and value your thoughts.

Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 In a message dated 2/1/2007 6:40:29 A.M. Pacific  Standard Time, 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 So you'll know where I am on this,  I consider it sort of a playful
 attempt at cute. The form of the mouth, its  total stance and
 shadow I
 find pleasing. FTR, I don't feel it's a 'strong'  image.
 I have absolutely no emotional investment in it and guarantee that 
 I'll
 find no comment offensive. Just curious as to what it may elicit.
 It  won't come up again.
 
 Jack
 --- Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:
 
  Sorting through some secondary slide storage, I came across  this
 and
  found that I still consider some of its shapes  pleasing.
  Guess it doesn't matter where you find them.
  
   Jack
  
  Comments welcome!
  
   http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=217
 
 
 Oh,  in that case... ;-)
 
 The bottom edge of the creamer is too close to the  bottom edge of
 the 
 picture. 
 
 Actually, I feel this MIGHT be an  interesting subject and
 background, but I 
 don't think you got the best angle on  it. Something a little closer,
 a little 
 lower down, or something, I feel could  have made it cuter.
 
 Marnie aka Doe :-)  
 
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 



 

8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time 
with the Yahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#news

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net