Re: PESO: Not a street shot :-)
Great shot. The colours of the clothes, or lack therof:-), against the drab car work well. Tells a story it does.Lens seems decent enough. BTW this is were Celsius work better. It was only 38 here in To, Dave > The mercury topped off in the high nineties (F of course) today, so two > ice creams are allowed. By the way this is NOT a street shot because it > was not taken with a focal length prescribed by the AOPSS (Arcane Order > of Pretentious Street Shooters :-)). Seriously it's with the CA 50-200, > 200mm, f6.7 @ 1/500, ISO 200, continuous autofocus. > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3485327 > Paul >
Re: PESO: Not a street shot :-)
Will do. I was thinking the same thing. I also have a wide open shot (by chance of another young lady) that I'll upload soon. Paul On Jun 26, 2005, at 7:38 AM, Joaquim Carvalho wrote: David Savage wrote: The second thing I was drawn to, is that you managed to catch a single drop of melted ice cream. For some weird reason I think that's pretty neat. Paul, you could make full size a crop of the drop of melted ice cream so we can check that it really is one and the quality of the CA 50-200 lens @ 200mm f6.7 On 6/26/05, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The mercury topped off in the high nineties (F of course) today, so two ice creams are allowed. By the way this is NOT a street shot because it was not taken with a focal length prescribed by the AOPSS (Arcane Order of Pretentious Street Shooters :-)). Seriously it's with the CA 50-200, 200mm, f6.7 @ 1/500, ISO 200, continuous autofocus. http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3485327 Paul
Re: PESO: Not a street shot :-)
David Savage wrote: The second thing I was drawn to, is that you managed to catch a single drop of melted ice cream. For some weird reason I think that's pretty neat. Paul, you could make full size a crop of the drop of melted ice cream so we can check that it really is one and the quality of the CA 50-200 lens @ 200mm f6.7 On 6/26/05, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The mercury topped off in the high nineties (F of course) today, so two ice creams are allowed. By the way this is NOT a street shot because it was not taken with a focal length prescribed by the AOPSS (Arcane Order of Pretentious Street Shooters :-)). Seriously it's with the CA 50-200, 200mm, f6.7 @ 1/500, ISO 200, continuous autofocus. http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3485327 Paul
Re: PESO: Not a street shot :-)
Your absolutely right. It's not a street shot, it's a pretty girl shot. And a very nice one at that. The second thing I was drawn to, is that you managed to catch a single drop of melted ice cream. For some weird reason I think that's pretty neat. Dave On 6/26/05, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The mercury topped off in the high nineties (F of course) today, so two > ice creams are allowed. By the way this is NOT a street shot because it > was not taken with a focal length prescribed by the AOPSS (Arcane Order > of Pretentious Street Shooters :-)). Seriously it's with the CA 50-200, > 200mm, f6.7 @ 1/500, ISO 200, continuous autofocus. > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3485327 > Paul > >
Re: PESO: Not a street shot :-)
It certainly is a good, crisp photo, which means that lens is fine performer. All kidding aside, it will do you well. Godfrey On Jun 25, 2005, at 2:11 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: It's the DA 50-200 of course. I'm very pleased with its performance. This shot is quite sharp at 100%. Perhaps i'll post a detail later. Paul On Jun 25, 2005, at 4:55 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: Paul Stenquist wrote: The mercury topped off in the high nineties (F of course) today, so two ice creams are allowed. By the way this is NOT a street shot because it was not taken with a focal length prescribed by the AOPSS (Arcane Order of Pretentious Street Shooters :-)). Seriously it's with the CA 50-200, 200mm, f6.7 @ 1/500, ISO 200, continuous autofocus. http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3485327 Damn right that's not a street shot, it's a cheeky chippie shot. Hm. A "CA 50-200" lens? A celebration of Chromatic Aberration? ;-) Godfrey Chairman, AOPSS
Re: PESO: Not a street shot :-)
Thanks Scott and Frank. I didn't see Frank's reply. I haven't been getting all the mail tonight. Paul On Jun 25, 2005, at 8:37 PM, Scott Loveless wrote: On 6/25/05, frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I don't much give a crap what it was shot with. OTOH, I don't give a crap if one wants to call it a "street shot" or not. I like it. Maybe I'm a pig (well, I guess there's not much doubt about that, really), but I like a pic of a good looking woman. And, this is one. I'll second that! Nice photo, too. -- Scott Loveless http://www.twosixteen.com -- "You have to hold the button down" -Arnold Newman
Re: PESO: Not a street shot :-)
On 6/25/05, frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't much give a crap what it was shot with. OTOH, I don't give a > crap if one wants to call it a "street shot" or not. I like it. > Maybe I'm a pig (well, I guess there's not much doubt about that, > really), but I like a pic of a good looking woman. > > And, this is one. > I'll second that! Nice photo, too. -- Scott Loveless http://www.twosixteen.com -- "You have to hold the button down" -Arnold Newman
Re: PESO: Not a street shot :-)
Spurs? What spurs? I have a selective memory :-). Thanks for the comment and the street photography tips :-)). Paul On Jun 25, 2005, at 6:52 PM, E.R.N. Reed wrote: On 6/25/05, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The mercury topped off in the high nineties (F of course) today, so two ice creams are allowed. By the way this is NOT a street shot because it was not taken with a focal length prescribed by the AOPSS (Arcane Order of Pretentious Street Shooters :-)). Seriously it's with the CA 50-200, 200mm, f6.7 @ 1/500, ISO 200, continuous autofocus. http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3485327 Paul Doesn't the Arcane Order also prescribe black & white, preferably grainy? oh yeah, I really like the moment you've caught. and btw, YEA SPURS!!
RE: PESO: Not a street shot :-)
That's one hot babe! (I can tell by the way the ice cream's dripping) Nice shot Paul. Pretty handy little lens. Don > -Original Message- > From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 2:39 PM > To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net > Subject: PESO: Not a street shot :-) > > > The mercury topped off in the high nineties (F of course) today, so two > ice creams are allowed. By the way this is NOT a street shot because it > was not taken with a focal length prescribed by the AOPSS (Arcane Order > of Pretentious Street Shooters :-)). Seriously it's with the CA 50-200, > 200mm, f6.7 @ 1/500, ISO 200, continuous autofocus. > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3485327 > Paul >
Re: PESO: Not a street shot :-)
On 6/25/05, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The mercury topped off in the high nineties (F of course) today, so two ice creams are allowed. By the way this is NOT a street shot because it was not taken with a focal length prescribed by the AOPSS (Arcane Order of Pretentious Street Shooters :-)). Seriously it's with the CA 50-200, 200mm, f6.7 @ 1/500, ISO 200, continuous autofocus. http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3485327 Paul Doesn't the Arcane Order also prescribe black & white, preferably grainy? oh yeah, I really like the moment you've caught. and btw, YEA SPURS!!
Re: PESO: Not a street shot :-)
Hello Paul, Keep showing us shots from that new lens. I am quite anxious to see how well it performs wide open at different focal lengths. Like the shot BTW! -- Best regards, Bruce Saturday, June 25, 2005, 12:38:57 PM, you wrote: PS> The mercury topped off in the high nineties (F of course) today, so two PS> ice creams are allowed. By the way this is NOT a street shot because it PS> was not taken with a focal length prescribed by the AOPSS (Arcane Order PS> of Pretentious Street Shooters :-)). Seriously it's with the CA 50-200, PS> 200mm, f6.7 @ 1/500, ISO 200, continuous autofocus. PS> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3485327 PS> Paul
Re: PESO: Not a street shot :-)
On 6/25/05, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The mercury topped off in the high nineties (F of course) today, so two > ice creams are allowed. By the way this is NOT a street shot because it > was not taken with a focal length prescribed by the AOPSS (Arcane Order > of Pretentious Street Shooters :-)). Seriously it's with the CA 50-200, > 200mm, f6.7 @ 1/500, ISO 200, continuous autofocus. > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3485327 > Paul I don't much give a crap what it was shot with. OTOH, I don't give a crap if one wants to call it a "street shot" or not. I like it. Maybe I'm a pig (well, I guess there's not much doubt about that, really), but I like a pic of a good looking woman. And, this is one. Nice grab, Paul. You got her mid-lick. cheers, frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Re: PESO: Not a street shot :-)
It's the DA 50-200 of course. I'm very pleased with its performance. This shot is quite sharp at 100%. Perhaps i'll post a detail later. Paul On Jun 25, 2005, at 4:55 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: Paul Stenquist wrote: The mercury topped off in the high nineties (F of course) today, so two ice creams are allowed. By the way this is NOT a street shot because it was not taken with a focal length prescribed by the AOPSS (Arcane Order of Pretentious Street Shooters :-)). Seriously it's with the CA 50-200, 200mm, f6.7 @ 1/500, ISO 200, continuous autofocus. http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3485327 Damn right that's not a street shot, it's a cheeky chippie shot. Hm. A "CA 50-200" lens? A celebration of Chromatic Aberration? ;-) Godfrey Chairman, AOPSS
Re: PESO: Not a street shot :-)
Paul Stenquist wrote: The mercury topped off in the high nineties (F of course) today, so two ice creams are allowed. By the way this is NOT a street shot because it was not taken with a focal length prescribed by the AOPSS (Arcane Order of Pretentious Street Shooters :-)). Seriously it's with the CA 50-200, 200mm, f6.7 @ 1/500, ISO 200, continuous autofocus. http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3485327 Damn right that's not a street shot, it's a cheeky chippie shot. Hm. A "CA 50-200" lens? A celebration of Chromatic Aberration? ;-) Godfrey Chairman, AOPSS
Re: PESO: Not a street shot :-)
Paul Stenquist wrote: The mercury topped off in the high nineties (F of course) today, so two ice creams are allowed. By the way this is NOT a street shot because it was not taken with a focal length prescribed by the AOPSS (Arcane Order of Pretentious Street Shooters :-)). Seriously it's with the CA 50-200, 200mm, f6.7 @ 1/500, ISO 200, continuous autofocus. http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3485327 Paul And, two sets of keys... Yup. Choice indeed... You can tell the AF works just fine! keith whaley
