Re: Rectangular filter systems

2002-09-05 Thread Jostein



Have you tried the polariser?
Take another look.
Jostein

-- Original Message --
From: Pål_Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 23:51:40 +0200

Jostein wrote:

 The reason is simple. If you measure the diameter on inside of 
the Cokin P
 holder, it's 75mm. I know it is proclaimed to work with some 
lenses of
 larger diameters, but don't count on it. It produce detectable 
vignetting
 with lenses like 645A*300/4, 645A45/2.8, FA*400/5.6 and to some 
extent on
 FA*24/2 and FA20/2.8.


It does not vignette with the FA645 45/2.8 lens.

Pål



.




Re: Rectangular filter systems

2002-09-05 Thread gfen

On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Jostein wrote:
 Its is true as has been said about the cokins that they can change colour

Well, my plans to settle on using Cokin filters for most everything 'cross
formats have just been sullied... What kind of time frame are we talking
about for a change?

 You mentioned Singh-Ray; other brands are Lee and Tiffen.

I was under the impression that all these various brands of square filters
could all fit the holders of other manufactures, regardless of brand,
correct? I was thinking about using teh Cokin P holder on my various
lenses, and then starting out with Cokin filters and replacing them as
time (and motivation) lead on...

-- 
http://www.infotainment.org
 The destructive character is cheerful.  - Walter Benjamin




Re: Rectangular filter systems

2002-09-05 Thread Jostein




-- Original Message --
From: gfen [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Well, my plans to settle on using Cokin filters for most
 everything 'cross
formats have just been sullied... What kind of time frame are we
 talking
about for a change?


I've had my gradual gray for five years and the pola for 2 years. 
But just one filter of each kind is a bit small a sample. Maybe 
there are variations in lifespan between production batches for 
all I know.


I was under the impression that all these various brands of
 square filters
could all fit the holders of other manufactures, regardless of
brand,
correct? I was thinking about using teh Cokin P holder on my 
various
lenses, and then starting out with Cokin filters and replacing
them as
time (and motivation) lead on...

Both Singh-ray, Tiffen, and Hitech (forgot that one yesterday) 
make Cokin P -size filters (84 or 85mm). Lee's standard size is 
100mm. Can't remember if they will deliver P size on demand.

BTW, BH has a rather comprehensive webpage on rectangular 
filters, where you can compare prices of different makes for a 
given type of filter. This link may be too long...

http://www02.bhphotovideo.com/default.sph/FrameWork.class?
FNC=CatalogActivator__Acatalog_html___CatID=3829___SID=F050E8E2C10


Best,
Jostein.




Re: Rectangular filter systems

2002-09-05 Thread Jostein


- Original Message -
From: W.Xato [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 But does the polarizer have a
 color cast when using it?  The Cokin ones in the store
 look green to me.  My Cokin ND grads were also green.

I discovered a colour skew looking at some pictures of a forest interior,
and compared the colours with and without the pola. My first thought was
blue-gray, but maybe I should look again.

Anyway, whether it's blue-gray or green, it's not how it should be...

Best,
Jostein




Re[2]: Rectangular filter systems

2002-09-05 Thread Bob Walkden

Hi,

 The hitech ones are much better and are generally regarded as the best
 value/quality buy.

I have an unused Hitech filter holder with 2 filter slots, a circular
holder for polarisers and a 77mm attachment thing. Also an unused
Hitech graduated neutral gray filter. If anybody's interested in
buying them I'll listen to any reasonable offer, to include shipping
from the UK. Replies in private, please.

I've also got one with 3 filter slots and I'm pretty certain I have a
2nd grad. ND (different strength), but I can't find them at the
moment. I can't tell what strength the grad. nd I can find is - it's
not written on the packaging.

---

 Bob  

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thursday, September 5, 2002, 3:11:28 PM, you wrote:

 I have heard many times that the cokin filters are far from neutral in
 colour even from day 1.

 The hitech ones are much better and are generally regarded as the best
 value/quality buy.

 Pesonally, as grads in particulare are used for landscapes where I often
 use the Fa24 or Sigma 17-35, Cokin P is probably too small, and I am
 thinking seriously about Lee.  You can get some combo packs of lee grads
  stuff which look quite interesting and I think I can afford it.  Cokin
 X-Pro is just ridiculously expensive.

 Rob

 -Original Message-
 From: gfen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: 05 September 2002 14:10
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Rectangular filter systems
 
 
 On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Jostein wrote:
  Its is true as has been said about the cokins that they can change 
  colour
 
 Well, my plans to settle on using Cokin filters for most 
 everything 'cross formats have just been sullied... What kind 
 of time frame are we talking about for a change?
 
  You mentioned Singh-Ray; other brands are Lee and Tiffen.
 
 I was under the impression that all these various brands of 
 square filters could all fit the holders of other 
 manufactures, regardless of brand, correct? I was thinking 
 about using teh Cokin P holder on my various lenses, and then 
 starting out with Cokin filters and replacing them as time 
 (and motivation) lead on...
 
 -- 
 http://www.infotainment.org
  The destructive character is cheerful.  - Walter Benjamin
 
 




Re: Rectangular filter systems

2002-09-05 Thread Pål Jensen

Jostein wrote:
 
 That's interesting. Is it possible to rotate the Singh-Ray in the 
 holder the same way as the Cokin?


Yes.




RE: Rectangular filter systems

2002-09-05 Thread wendy beard


Subject: RE: Rectangular filter systems

Pesonally, as grads in particulare are used for landscapes where I often
use the Fa24 or Sigma 17-35, Cokin P is probably too small, and I am
thinking seriously about Lee.  You can get some combo packs of lee grads
 stuff which look quite interesting and I think I can afford it.  Cokin
X-Pro is just ridiculously expensive.

Rob

Oh, I know. I was looking to get a filter holder and a couple of filters 
for the 55mm 67 lens. I almost fainted at the price of the X-Pro stuff.
Needless to say I didn't buy anything. If I had have done, I wouldn't have 
been able to afford to go on holiday so negating the use for the filters 
anyway!

Wendy

---
Wendy Beard
Ottawa, Canada
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
home page http://www.beard-redfern.com




Rectangular filter systems

2002-09-04 Thread Stephen Moore


O Pentaxians --

Do any of you use these? 

Lately I've been feeling the need for an ND grad, which
sort of precludes the screw-on approach. The Cokin P system, 
at 84mm, seems big enough for most Pentax lenses except the
really big glass and one of the 6x7 lenses that has a 100mm
filter diameter. Singh-Ray seems to favor this size as well. 

I'd be happy to hear comments, praise, damns-with-faint-praise,
caveats, yike-don't-do-thats, etc. from the assembled wisdom.

Best regards,

Stephen Moore




RE: Rectangular filter systems

2002-09-04 Thread tom

 -Original Message-
 From: Stephen Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 3:12 PM
 To: Pentax List
 Subject: Rectangular filter systems



 O Pentaxians --

 Do any of you use these?

 Lately I've been feeling the need for an ND grad, which
 sort of precludes the screw-on approach. The Cokin P system,
 at 84mm, seems big enough for most Pentax lenses except the
 really big glass and one of the 6x7 lenses that has a 100mm
 filter diameter. Singh-Ray seems to favor this size as well.

 I'd be happy to hear comments, praise, damns-with-faint-praise,
 caveats, yike-don't-do-thats, etc. from the assembled wisdom.

I use a Cokin P holder and various filters from different
manufacturers for 35mm and 645. They work fine, I have no complaints.

tv




Rectangular filter systems

2002-09-04 Thread Herb Chong

Lately I've been feeling the need for an ND grad, which
sort of precludes the screw-on approach. The Cokin P system, 
at 84mm, seems big enough for most Pentax lenses except the
really big glass and one of the 6x7 lenses that has a 100mm
filter diameter. Singh-Ray seems to favor this size as well. 

if you use a ND gradient filter of any type, you cannot use a direct
screw-on filter except in the most limited of circumstances. you have to go
to a separate filter system with moveable filters. Cokin filters are prone
to fading or color shifting, so be prepared to replace them periodically.
other vendors should be more fade resistant.

Herb




Re: Rectangular filter systems

2002-09-04 Thread pz1p

the only complaint is that i can't attach lens hood so there is more likely
to have flare.

- Original Message -
From: Stephen Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 12:11 PM
Subject: Rectangular filter systems



 O Pentaxians --

 Do any of you use these?

 Lately I've been feeling the need for an ND grad, which
 sort of precludes the screw-on approach. The Cokin P system,
 at 84mm, seems big enough for most Pentax lenses except the
 really big glass and one of the 6x7 lenses that has a 100mm
 filter diameter. Singh-Ray seems to favor this size as well.

 I'd be happy to hear comments, praise, damns-with-faint-praise,
 caveats, yike-don't-do-thats, etc. from the assembled wisdom.

 Best regards,

 Stephen Moore










Re: Rectangular filter systems

2002-09-04 Thread Jostein

Hi, Steven.
First, it is a hazard to use Cokin P on lenses with 77mm filter diameter.
The reason is simple. If you measure the diameter on inside of the Cokin P
holder, it's 75mm. I know it is proclaimed to work with some lenses of
larger diameters, but don't count on it. It produce detectable vignetting
with lenses like 645A*300/4, 645A45/2.8, FA*400/5.6 and to some extent on
FA*24/2 and FA20/2.8.

I know, why put a filter on a 400, but a gradual gray comes in handy
sometimes anyway.

Its is true as has been said about the cokins that they can change colour
over time. My gradual gray (G2) give a slight green cast, and recently I
discovered my pola to give a blue-greyish tint. They're both in line for the
thrashcan as soon as I can have them replaced.

The big advantage of Cokins is availability and price. Btw, Cokin also
produce a filter series larger than the P. But more pricey of course.

You mentioned Singh-Ray; other brands are Lee and Tiffen.
http://www.leefilters.com/
http://www.tiffen.com/

Best,
Jostein

- Original Message -
From: Stephen Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 9:11 PM
Subject: Rectangular filter systems



 O Pentaxians --

 Do any of you use these?

 Lately I've been feeling the need for an ND grad, which
 sort of precludes the screw-on approach. The Cokin P system,
 at 84mm, seems big enough for most Pentax lenses except the
 really big glass and one of the 6x7 lenses that has a 100mm
 filter diameter. Singh-Ray seems to favor this size as well.

 I'd be happy to hear comments, praise, damns-with-faint-praise,
 caveats, yike-don't-do-thats, etc. from the assembled wisdom.

 Best regards,

 Stephen Moore






Re: Rectangular filter systems

2002-09-04 Thread Pål Jensen

Jostein wrote:

 The reason is simple. If you measure the diameter on inside of the Cokin P
 holder, it's 75mm. I know it is proclaimed to work with some lenses of
 larger diameters, but don't count on it. It produce detectable vignetting
 with lenses like 645A*300/4, 645A45/2.8, FA*400/5.6 and to some extent on
 FA*24/2 and FA20/2.8.


It does not vignette with the FA645 45/2.8 lens.

Pål





Rectangular filter systems

2002-09-04 Thread Tom Reese

I believe that the graduated gray filters work based on what I've seen in
several different publications. The before and after pictures convinced me.
I bought the Cokin P ones because they're cheap and I wanted to make sure
they made a difference before I went for the expensive glass ones. I used
them last weekend and I haven't gotten my pictures back yet so I can't tell
you how I did. I can tell you that it's difficult to see the line between
light and dark when you look through the viewfinder. You have to stop down
pretty far for the filter to work effectively and the viewfinder gets dark
enough that it's hard to see the difference that the filter makes. The
articles mention that turning the filter makes it easier to see.

I'll keep practicing...

Tom Reese


Stephen Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Lately I've been feeling the need for an ND grad, which
sort of precludes the screw-on approach. The Cokin P system,
at 84mm, seems big enough for most Pentax lenses except the
really big glass and one of the 6x7 lenses that has a 100mm
filter diameter. Singh-Ray seems to favor this size as well.

I'd be happy to hear comments, praise, damns-with-faint-praise,
caveats, yike-don't-do-thats, etc. from the assembled wisdom.