Reedbed

2007-04-09 Thread Bob W
Hi,

I don't usually muck about much with photos, just presenting them more
or less as they come straight from the camera. However, here are a
couple of photos from a reedbed close to my house:

http://www.web-options.com/Reedbed/

I have altered the curves on both of these because the originals are
very muddy:
http://www.web-options.com/_4084933.jpg
http://www.web-options.com/_4084944.jpg

I'd be interested to hear peoples' opinions about these alterations.
Do they look natural? I've done them by eye, but I don't trust my eyes
in this sort of thing, being colourblind. Do they look overdone?

The more I look at them, the more I think the edited ones are overdone
and overdramatic. The unedited ones have a calm about them, despite
the muddiness, which I quite like, but I feel as though they could do
with something a bit more.

Opinions, please?

Thanks,
Bob


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Reedbed

2007-04-09 Thread Brian Walters
I think you're right that they do look muddy but I think your treatment goes a 
little too far in the opposite direction.  

Looking at 4084944, getting a golden glow on the reeds is on the right track 
but seems overdone here.  I think you also need to try to retain darkness in 
the background foliage (maybe use a layer mask to partially protect the 
background foliage from the adjustments carried out on the reeds).

The images are well worth a bit of work.


Cheers

Brian

++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia


Quoting Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Hi,
 
 I don't usually muck about much with photos, just presenting them
 more
 or less as they come straight from the camera. However, here are a
 couple of photos from a reedbed close to my house:
 
 http://www.web-options.com/Reedbed/
 
 I have altered the curves on both of these because the originals
 are
 very muddy:
 http://www.web-options.com/_4084933.jpg
 http://www.web-options.com/_4084944.jpg
 
 I'd be interested to hear peoples' opinions about these
 alterations.
 Do they look natural? I've done them by eye, but I don't trust my
 eyes
 in this sort of thing, being colourblind. Do they look overdone?
 
 The more I look at them, the more I think the edited ones are
 overdone
 and overdramatic. The unedited ones have a calm about them,
 despite
 the muddiness, which I quite like, but I feel as though they could
 do
 with something a bit more.
 
 Opinions, please?
 
 Thanks,
 Bob
 



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Reedbed

2007-04-09 Thread Jack Davis
Bob,
I'm impressed with your treatment of these images. 4084944 is
exceedingly nice.

Jack
--- Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,
 
 I don't usually muck about much with photos, just presenting them
 more
 or less as they come straight from the camera. However, here are a
 couple of photos from a reedbed close to my house:
 
 http://www.web-options.com/Reedbed/
 
 I have altered the curves on both of these because the originals are
 very muddy:
 http://www.web-options.com/_4084933.jpg
 http://www.web-options.com/_4084944.jpg
 
 I'd be interested to hear peoples' opinions about these alterations.
 Do they look natural? I've done them by eye, but I don't trust my
 eyes
 in this sort of thing, being colourblind. Do they look overdone?
 
 The more I look at them, the more I think the edited ones are
 overdone
 and overdramatic. The unedited ones have a calm about them, despite
 the muddiness, which I quite like, but I feel as though they could do
 with something a bit more.
 
 Opinions, please?
 
 Thanks,
 Bob
 
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 



 

Finding fabulous fares is fun.  
Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel 
bargains.
http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Reedbed

2007-04-09 Thread mike wilson
Bob W wrote:

 Hi,
 
 I don't usually muck about much with photos, just presenting them more
 or less as they come straight from the camera. However, here are a
 couple of photos from a reedbed close to my house:
 
 http://www.web-options.com/Reedbed/
 
 I have altered the curves on both of these because the originals are
 very muddy:
 http://www.web-options.com/_4084933.jpg
 http://www.web-options.com/_4084944.jpg
 
 I'd be interested to hear peoples' opinions about these alterations.
 Do they look natural? I've done them by eye, but I don't trust my eyes
 in this sort of thing, being colourblind. Do they look overdone?
 
 The more I look at them, the more I think the edited ones are overdone
 and overdramatic. The unedited ones have a calm about them, despite
 the muddiness, which I quite like, but I feel as though they could do
 with something a bit more.
 
 Opinions, please?

They remind me of prints made in the 1970s, using Russian optics. 
Flary, slightly faded to that orange haze that they eventually 
degenerate into.  Ideal for a Cadbury's Flake advert.  You might call it 
impressionistic.  8-)  I do like it.

The room I'm viewing them in is far too bright.  I might change my mind 
this evening.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Reedbed

2007-04-09 Thread Rick Womer
I like the originals better; they are very nice.
Rick
--- Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,
 
 I don't usually muck about much with photos, just
 presenting them more
 or less as they come straight from the camera.
 However, here are a
 couple of photos from a reedbed close to my house:
 
 http://www.web-options.com/Reedbed/
 
 I have altered the curves on both of these because
 the originals are
 very muddy:
 http://www.web-options.com/_4084933.jpg
 http://www.web-options.com/_4084944.jpg
 
 I'd be interested to hear peoples' opinions about
 these alterations.
 Do they look natural? I've done them by eye, but I
 don't trust my eyes
 in this sort of thing, being colourblind. Do they
 look overdone?
 
 The more I look at them, the more I think the edited
 ones are overdone
 and overdramatic. The unedited ones have a calm
 about them, despite
 the muddiness, which I quite like, but I feel as
 though they could do
 with something a bit more.
 
 Opinions, please?
 
 Thanks,
 Bob
 
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 


http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW


 

Now that's room service!  Choose from over 150,000 hotels
in 45,000 destinations on Yahoo! Travel to find your fit.
http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Reedbed

2007-04-09 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
xx933.jpg and your altered version are both excellent, they have a  
different feel but both are pleasant.

xx944.jpg and the altered version differ more: I think you went a bit  
too far on that one and blew out the highlights. xx944.jpg is more  
delicate and needs just a tiny bit of adjustment to work well.

Both are excellent photos!

Godfrey

On Apr 9, 2007, at 1:41 AM, Bob W wrote:

 I don't usually muck about much with photos, just presenting them more
 or less as they come straight from the camera. However, here are a
 couple of photos from a reedbed close to my house:

 http://www.web-options.com/Reedbed/

 I have altered the curves on both of these because the originals are
 very muddy:
 http://www.web-options.com/_4084933.jpg
 http://www.web-options.com/_4084944.jpg

 I'd be interested to hear peoples' opinions about these alterations.
 Do they look natural? I've done them by eye, but I don't trust my eyes
 in this sort of thing, being colourblind. Do they look overdone?

 The more I look at them, the more I think the edited ones are overdone
 and overdramatic. The unedited ones have a calm about them, despite
 the muddiness, which I quite like, but I feel as though they could do
 with something a bit more.

 Opinions, please?


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Reedbed

2007-04-09 Thread Eactivist
Pretty. I prefer the second. BTW, it has a white  spot near the upper left 
that I would clone out. The first is fine, but a bit on  the light side. More 
midtone contrast might perk it up a tad more.

Both  are nice.

Marnie aka Doe  :-)
---


Hi,

I don't usually muck about  much with photos, just presenting them more
or less as they come straight  from the camera. However, here are a
couple of photos from a reedbed close to  my house:

http://www.web-options.com/Reedbed/

I have altered the  curves on both of these because the originals are
very  muddy:
http://www.web-options.com/_4084933.jpg
http://www.web-options.com/_4084944.jpg

I'd  be interested to hear peoples' opinions about these alterations.
Do they look  natural? I've done them by eye, but I don't trust my eyes
in this sort of  thing, being colourblind. Do they look overdone?

The more I look at them,  the more I think the edited ones are overdone
and overdramatic. The unedited  ones have a calm about them, despite
the muddiness, which I quite like, but I  feel as though they could do
with something a bit more.

Opinions,  please?

Thanks,
Bob  




** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Reedbed

2007-04-09 Thread Boris Liberman
Bob, I think you did the right thing or almost the right thing.

However on the second image the curve brought out the little flare patch 
just above and to the right from the weeds.

There may be different ways to treat the originals however. May be even 
more towards the dark direction.

Boris

Bob W wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I don't usually muck about much with photos, just presenting them more
 or less as they come straight from the camera. However, here are a
 couple of photos from a reedbed close to my house:
 
 http://www.web-options.com/Reedbed/
 
 I have altered the curves on both of these because the originals are
 very muddy:
 http://www.web-options.com/_4084933.jpg
 http://www.web-options.com/_4084944.jpg
 
 I'd be interested to hear peoples' opinions about these alterations.
 Do they look natural? I've done them by eye, but I don't trust my eyes
 in this sort of thing, being colourblind. Do they look overdone?
 
 The more I look at them, the more I think the edited ones are overdone
 and overdramatic. The unedited ones have a calm about them, despite
 the muddiness, which I quite like, but I feel as though they could do
 with something a bit more.
 
 Opinions, please?
 
 Thanks,
 Bob
 
 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Reedbed

2007-04-09 Thread P. J. Alling
The unedited versions look a bit flat and colorless.  The modified 
versions may be too vibrant, but are much preferable.  I couldn't tell 
you which was more accurate I wasn't there.

Bob W wrote:
 Hi,

 I don't usually muck about much with photos, just presenting them more
 or less as they come straight from the camera. However, here are a
 couple of photos from a reedbed close to my house:

 http://www.web-options.com/Reedbed/

 I have altered the curves on both of these because the originals are
 very muddy:
 http://www.web-options.com/_4084933.jpg
 http://www.web-options.com/_4084944.jpg

 I'd be interested to hear peoples' opinions about these alterations.
 Do they look natural? I've done them by eye, but I don't trust my eyes
 in this sort of thing, being colourblind. Do they look overdone?

 The more I look at them, the more I think the edited ones are overdone
 and overdramatic. The unedited ones have a calm about them, despite
 the muddiness, which I quite like, but I feel as though they could do
 with something a bit more.

 Opinions, please?

 Thanks,
 Bob


   


-- 
Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf 
thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


RE: Reedbed

2007-04-09 Thread Bob W
Thanks Mike, and everyone else who commented. I have made an
in-between version:

http://www.web-options.com/Easter/content/_4084944_large.html

--
 Bob
 
  
  I don't usually muck about much with photos, just 
 presenting them more
  or less as they come straight from the camera. However, here are a
  couple of photos from a reedbed close to my house:
  
  http://www.web-options.com/Reedbed/
  
  I have altered the curves on both of these because the originals
are
  very muddy:
  http://www.web-options.com/_4084933.jpg
  http://www.web-options.com/_4084944.jpg
  
  I'd be interested to hear peoples' opinions about these
alterations.
  Do they look natural? I've done them by eye, but I don't 
 trust my eyes
  in this sort of thing, being colourblind. Do they look overdone?
  
  The more I look at them, the more I think the edited ones 
 are overdone
  and overdramatic. The unedited ones have a calm about them,
despite
  the muddiness, which I quite like, but I feel as though 
 they could do
  with something a bit more.
  
  Opinions, please?
 
 They remind me of prints made in the 1970s, using Russian optics. 
 Flary, slightly faded to that orange haze that they eventually 
 degenerate into.  Ideal for a Cadbury's Flake advert.  You 
 might call it 
 impressionistic.  8-)  I do like it.
 
 The room I'm viewing them in is far too bright.  I might 
 change my mind 
 this evening.
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 
 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Reedbed

2007-04-09 Thread frank theriault
On 4/9/07, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,

 I don't usually muck about much with photos, just presenting them more
 or less as they come straight from the camera. However, here are a
 couple of photos from a reedbed close to my house:

 http://www.web-options.com/Reedbed/

 I have altered the curves on both of these because the originals are
 very muddy:
 http://www.web-options.com/_4084933.jpg
 http://www.web-options.com/_4084944.jpg

 I'd be interested to hear peoples' opinions about these alterations.
 Do they look natural? I've done them by eye, but I don't trust my eyes
 in this sort of thing, being colourblind. Do they look overdone?

 The more I look at them, the more I think the edited ones are overdone
 and overdramatic. The unedited ones have a calm about them, despite
 the muddiness, which I quite like, but I feel as though they could do
 with something a bit more.

 Opinions, please?

By far, I prefer your alterations, in both cases.

Lovely, lovely photos!!

cheers,
frank

-- 
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept.  -Henri Cartier-Bresson

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Reedbed

2007-04-09 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
That looks excellent, Bob!

Godfrey

On Apr 9, 2007, at 2:27 PM, Bob W wrote:

 Thanks Mike, and everyone else who commented. I have made an
 in-between version:

 http://www.web-options.com/Easter/content/_4084944_large.html


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


RE: Reedbed

2007-04-09 Thread Brian Walters

Yes, that's about right.


Cheers

Brian

++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia


Quoting Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Thanks Mike, and everyone else who commented. I have made an
 in-between version:
 
 http://www.web-options.com/Easter/content/_4084944_large.html
 
 --
  Bob
  
   
   I don't usually muck about much with photos, just 
  presenting them more
   or less as they come straight from the camera. However, here
 are a
   couple of photos from a reedbed close to my house:
   
   http://www.web-options.com/Reedbed/
   
   I have altered the curves on both of these because the
 originals
 are
   very muddy:
   http://www.web-options.com/_4084933.jpg
   http://www.web-options.com/_4084944.jpg
   
   I'd be interested to hear peoples' opinions about these
 alterations.
   Do they look natural? I've done them by eye, but I don't 
  trust my eyes
   in this sort of thing, being colourblind. Do they look
 overdone?
   
   The more I look at them, the more I think the edited ones 
  are overdone
   and overdramatic. The unedited ones have a calm about them,
 despite
   the muddiness, which I quite like, but I feel as though 
  they could do
   with something a bit more.
   
   Opinions, please?





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


RE: Reedbed

2007-04-09 Thread Jack Davis
No, no, Bob.! They need the soft glow. Especially 4084944.
Sorry, the compromise is 'dead'.

Jack
--- Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Thanks Mike, and everyone else who commented. I have made an
 in-between version:
 
 http://www.web-options.com/Easter/content/_4084944_large.html
 
 --
  Bob
  
   
   I don't usually muck about much with photos, just 
  presenting them more
   or less as they come straight from the camera. However, here are
 a
   couple of photos from a reedbed close to my house:
   
   http://www.web-options.com/Reedbed/
   
   I have altered the curves on both of these because the originals
 are
   very muddy:
   http://www.web-options.com/_4084933.jpg
   http://www.web-options.com/_4084944.jpg
   
   I'd be interested to hear peoples' opinions about these
 alterations.
   Do they look natural? I've done them by eye, but I don't 
  trust my eyes
   in this sort of thing, being colourblind. Do they look overdone?
   
   The more I look at them, the more I think the edited ones 
  are overdone
   and overdramatic. The unedited ones have a calm about them,
 despite
   the muddiness, which I quite like, but I feel as though 
  they could do
   with something a bit more.
   
   Opinions, please?
  
  They remind me of prints made in the 1970s, using Russian optics. 
  Flary, slightly faded to that orange haze that they eventually 
  degenerate into.  Ideal for a Cadbury's Flake advert.  You 
  might call it 
  impressionistic.  8-)  I do like it.
  
  The room I'm viewing them in is far too bright.  I might 
  change my mind 
  this evening.
  
  -- 
  PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
  PDML@pdml.net
  http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
  
  
 
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 



 

Bored stiff? Loosen up... 
Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games.
http://games.yahoo.com/games/front

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Reedbed

2007-04-09 Thread Bruce Dayton
Well put.

-- 
Bruce


Monday, April 9, 2007, 4:36:40 AM, you wrote:

BW I think you're right that they do look muddy but I think your
BW treatment goes a little too far in the opposite direction.  

BW Looking at 4084944, getting a golden glow on the reeds is on
BW the right track but seems overdone here.  I think you also need to
BW try to retain darkness in the background foliage (maybe use a
BW layer mask to partially protect the background foliage from the
BW adjustments carried out on the reeds).

BW The images are well worth a bit of work.


BW Cheers

BW Brian

BW ++
BW Brian Walters
BW Western Sydney Australia


BW Quoting Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Hi,
 
 I don't usually muck about much with photos, just presenting them
 more
 or less as they come straight from the camera. However, here are a
 couple of photos from a reedbed close to my house:
 
 http://www.web-options.com/Reedbed/
 
 I have altered the curves on both of these because the originals
 are
 very muddy:
 http://www.web-options.com/_4084933.jpg
 http://www.web-options.com/_4084944.jpg
 
 I'd be interested to hear peoples' opinions about these
 alterations.
 Do they look natural? I've done them by eye, but I don't trust my
 eyes
 in this sort of thing, being colourblind. Do they look overdone?
 
 The more I look at them, the more I think the edited ones are
 overdone
 and overdramatic. The unedited ones have a calm about them,
 despite
 the muddiness, which I quite like, but I feel as though they could
 do
 with something a bit more.
 
 Opinions, please?
 
 Thanks,
 Bob
 






-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net