AF extensions tubes - was Why Pentax *ist (35mm) isn't good?

2003-06-20 Thread Paul Ewins
Why would they correct the aperture value for the extension? This is
just the same as having your lens at minimum focusing distance, surely
the meter just reads that as less light coming through?

Paul Ewins
Melbourne, Australia

-Original Message-
From: Alin Flaider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Do the Kenko AF tubes correct the transmitted aperture value with
   the extension tube's factor? - otherwise it messes with
   multisegment metering and it's pretty much useless.
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.488 / Virus Database: 287 - Release Date: 5/06/2003
 



Re: Why Pentax *ist (35mm) isn't good?

2003-06-19 Thread Heiko Hamann
Hi Jose,

on 19 Jun 03 you wrote in pentax.list:

I'm new in the forum, and it seems that the new Pentax *ist (35mm) is not a
favourite among forum members.
Can anybody explain me in a few words why?

In addition to Len's and Grawolf's replies: The *ist has mount, that  
doesn't support older SMC/SMC-M lenses (non-A-lenses). There are many  
useres who don't like this idea (some of them have a notable number of  
those lenses and they are disappointed that the *istD won't support them  
in a sensible way). But if I remember correctly then you are using only  
A-lenses. So this issue won't be a problem for you.

In other words, may I buy that camera, or the Nikon 75 or even the
veteran Canon EOS 300 are better choices?

I would prefer the *ist. The F75's viewfinder is terrible and I don't  
like Canon's user interface. I have tried the *ist on the Cebit this  
year and I was impressed by the fast AF, the good viewfinder and the  
ergonomic user interface. It has the most sophisticated AF system of  
all.

There is one thing all these entry-level camera's have in common: they  
look and feel quite cheap because of their silver plastics finishing.  
Not comparable to a solid Super A...;-)

Cheers, Heiko



Re: Why Pentax *ist (35mm) isn't good?

2003-06-19 Thread Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu
How about the auto extension tubes? The non-auto ones will work, of course -
but auto ext. tubes behaves like KM lenses, afaik.
If they won't work, I guess it's time for a new - A, maybe even FA -
version.

Alex



Re: Why Pentax *ist (35mm) isn't good?

2003-06-19 Thread Camdir
Alex.

The Kenko tubes have the AF 'screwdriver' connection. Plus all the electrical 
connections.

And they are available in PAF.

Kind regards

Peter



Re: Why Pentax *ist (35mm) isn't good?

2003-06-19 Thread Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu
Yes, of course - I was talking about the Pentax tubes, as I really think
they should be compatible with *ist, at least with *istD. I guess Pentax
should upgrade them (at least as A variants), because some people will want
to use them with *ist cameras; and I'm more than reasonable asking that
(instead of full-mount compatibility). Btw: I have the Pentax auto ext tubes
set; paid 39$ sh.

Btw: I saw the *ist in a store (in Romania, I mean); I looked at it only a
few minutes. It's so small... I think, smaller than MZ-60. It's also very
light, and I didn't liked the wheel and the on/of/DOF switch. The lens mount
is metal, but the base plate seems to be polycarbonate. The body is...
well... cheap, you can scratch it easily - even the MZ-6 is much better.
However, the viewfinder seems to be nicer than MZ-6's one, with a larger
eyepiece (I think).

- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 3:04 PM
Subject: Re: Why Pentax *ist (35mm) isn't good?


 Alex.

 The Kenko tubes have the AF 'screwdriver' connection. Plus all the
electrical
 connections.

 And they are available in PAF.

 Kind regards

 Peter





Re[2]: Why Pentax *ist (35mm) isn't good?

2003-06-19 Thread Alin Flaider

   Do the Kenko AF tubes correct the transmitted aperture value with
   the extension tube's factor? - otherwise it messes with
   multisegment metering and it's pretty much useless.

   Anyway, for this very reason, the A variety of tubes doesn't make
   any sense and we probably won't see it from Pentax. Instead, they'll
   come up directly with the FAJ tubes, that is if Pentax ever sees in
   its FAJ customers a potential market for specialty tools as macro
   tubes.
   
   Servus,   Alin

Peter wrote:

Cac The Kenko tubes have the AF 'screwdriver' connection. Plus all the electrical
Cac connections.
Cac And they are available in PAF.