Re: urgently need impression about Metz flash

2010-03-16 Thread AlunFoto
2010/3/16 Boris Liberman :
>> 2010/3/16 Boris Liberman:
>>>  I use it fairly often when photographing kids in Galia's class - it
>>> eliminates
>>> eye shadows, adds a bit of sprinkle to the eyes and generally is useful.
>>
>> Um...
>> Cry a lot, do they? :-)
>>
>
> Oh... After fifth reading of your message I see your humour, mista... Well,
> I can make them cry if I buy a strong power pack and shoot at 5fps ;-).

You could also attach a hose and a shower head to your flash, I guess.
Could be nice in summer, you know. :-)

Jostein

-- 
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: urgently need impression about Metz flash

2010-03-16 Thread Boris Liberman

On 3/16/2010 1:03 PM, AlunFoto wrote:

2010/3/16 Boris Liberman:

  I use it fairly often when photographing kids in Galia's class - it eliminates
eye shadows, adds a bit of sprinkle to the eyes and generally is useful.


Um...
Cry a lot, do they? :-)

Jostein



Oh... After fifth reading of your message I see your humour, mista... 
Well, I can make them cry if I buy a strong power pack and shoot at 5fps 
;-).


Boris

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: urgently need impression about Metz flash

2010-03-16 Thread Tim Øsleby
I've never used a Metz, but I used to have a Cullman with a second reflector.
I found this handy. Not for catch light, but to avoid raccoon eyes
when bouncing flash from above the subject.

--
MaritimTim

http://maritimtim.blogspot.com/



2010/3/8 Igor Roshchin :
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I was trying to place an order for a Pentax AF 540 FGZ flash, when
> I discovered that Metz 58 AF-1PS costs just $15 more.
>
> I've never had experience with any Metz flashes.
> Two main concerns that I have:
> 1. From what I read, all control is done via "soft" buttons, - e.g.
> via contextual menus. How ergonomic/cumbersome is it?
>
> 2. Have you had any issues with the compatibility with Pentax bodies
> (e.g. metering reproducibility, functionality, etc.)?
>
> Additionally:
> 3. How useful is the second reflector (source) when you tilt/swivel
> the flash head?
>
> I will need to place an order soon (Sunday, maybe Monday), so
> I would appreciate your quick responses.
>
> Igor
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
>

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: urgently need impression about Metz flash

2010-03-16 Thread AlunFoto
2010/3/16 Boris Liberman :
>  I use it fairly often when photographing kids in Galia's class - it 
> eliminates
> eye shadows, adds a bit of sprinkle to the eyes and generally is useful.

Um...
Cry a lot, do they? :-)

Jostein

-- 
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: urgently need impression about Metz flash

2010-03-16 Thread Boris Liberman

On 3/8/2010 2:55 AM, Igor Roshchin wrote:

Additionally:
3. How useful is the second reflector (source) when you tilt/swivel
the flash head?


My old Metz 40MZ-2 (or something like this) has a secondary light 
source. It also has two slide on gray filters to control the output of 
this source. I use it fairly often when photographing kids in Galia's 
class - it eliminates eye shadows, adds a bit of sprinkle to the eyes 
and generally is useful. It is especially useful when tilting/swiveling 
the flash because in my case it usually means underexposure due to 
specifics of the way this flash integrates with my camera.


HTH

Boris

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: urgently need impression about Metz flash

2010-03-09 Thread Peter Loveday
I have both of these also; I'd find it hard to split them, they both perform 
well.


The secondary reflector is handy for catchlights, esp. when you can't use 
the bounce card thing because you're bouncing off a wall at an odd angle.


I don't really find either menu system particularly more difficult to use.

The Metz will go down to 1/256 power, in 1/3rd steps - the Pentax only 1/64. 
Not relevant for 'normal' use, but can be handy for in-close off camera 
flash.


Both work fine in Pentax wireless mode.

The Metz full-power flash duration is 1/125 - so if you're shooting at 1/180 
full sync, you can't get quite the quoted power out of it - not by a lot, 
but you can see a difference in tests.  I don't think this is the case with 
the Pentax.


Both work in HSS, not sure on power levels here.

- Peter



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: urgently need impression about Metz flash

2010-03-08 Thread Igor Roshchin

Tomek and Jostein,

Thanks a lot for sharing your opinions!

Igor

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: urgently need impression about Metz flash

2010-03-08 Thread AlunFoto
2010/3/8 Igor Roshchin :
> Since you have both,
> if you were choosing between Metz 58A and Pentax 540 FGZ -
> which one and why would you choose?

Actually I like the Metz best, partly because of the extra tube for
CC. Since I got the Pentax back I haven't tested them head to head, so
I dunno about the consistency of the respective main tubes, though.

Jostein

-- 
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: urgently need impression about Metz flash

2010-03-07 Thread Igor Roshchin


Jostein,

Thank you for your response.

Since you have both, 
if you were choosing between Metz 58A and Pentax 540 FGZ -
which one and why would you choose?

Thank you,

Igor

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: urgently need impression about Metz flash

2010-03-07 Thread AlunFoto
Over here the Metz is cheaper than the Pentax.
I have both because I had to buy a replacement for the Pentax, then
got the Pentax repaired anyway.

1. Can't say the menu stuff bothers me. Depends on how much you need to fiddle.

2. I have only used it on K-7. It works fine there.

3. AFAIK there's only one bounce reflector, which is useless when
working in portrait mode. The extra flash tube can be considered to
replace the camera built-in flash for contrast control. The only times
you _want_ to use this feature is when you do tilt/swivel. In my
experience, it works best when set to the lowest output.

General impression is that this device is solidly made, and delivering
consistent blinks.



2010/3/8 Igor Roshchin :
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I was trying to place an order for a Pentax AF 540 FGZ flash, when
> I discovered that Metz 58 AF-1PS costs just $15 more.
>
> I've never had experience with any Metz flashes.
> Two main concerns that I have:
> 1. From what I read, all control is done via "soft" buttons, - e.g.
> via contextual menus. How ergonomic/cumbersome is it?
>
> 2. Have you had any issues with the compatibility with Pentax bodies
> (e.g. metering reproducibility, functionality, etc.)?
>
> Additionally:
> 3. How useful is the second reflector (source) when you tilt/swivel
> the flash head?
>
> I will need to place an order soon (Sunday, maybe Monday), so
> I would appreciate your quick responses.
>
> Igor
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
>



-- 
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: urgently need impression about Metz flash

2010-03-07 Thread Tomek Machnik

On 08-03-2010 01:55, Igor Roshchin wrote:


Additionally:
3. How useful is the second reflector (source) when you tilt/swivel
the flash head?


I haven't used the new "USB" Metz flashes, so can't comment on AF58 
usability, but I used several of the earlier big (40MZ.., 54MZ..) models 
on Pentax bodies before going dark side, and was very happy with them. 
Not with P-TTL itself though :)


The secondary flash might be used to create eye catchlights in close-up 
portraits (when you have absolutely no other choice but to do close 
portraits with on camera flash :), not for much else. You can safely 
ignore this feature.
Fill light from this tiny reflector was either too weak or too harsh, 
coming from small in-lens-axis source. Difficult to control, 
unpredictable, pretty useless IMO.
A business card sized piece of whatever white (usualy card sized white 
back of a card :) rubber-banded to tilted main reflector seems to be 
much more reliable as fill-in/catchlight.



cheers
tm

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


urgently need impression about Metz flash

2010-03-07 Thread Igor Roshchin


Hi All,

I was trying to place an order for a Pentax AF 540 FGZ flash, when 
I discovered that Metz 58 AF-1PS costs just $15 more. 

I've never had experience with any Metz flashes. 
Two main concerns that I have:
1. From what I read, all control is done via "soft" buttons, - e.g.
via contextual menus. How ergonomic/cumbersome is it?

2. Have you had any issues with the compatibility with Pentax bodies
(e.g. metering reproducibility, functionality, etc.)?

Additionally:
3. How useful is the second reflector (source) when you tilt/swivel 
the flash head?

I will need to place an order soon (Sunday, maybe Monday), so
I would appreciate your quick responses.

Igor


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.