Re: r26938 - docs/Perl6/Spec

[Eirik Berg Hanssen]

pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl writes:

  statement, or if you want to attach multiple statements. you must either
  use the curly form or surround the entire expression in brackets of some 
 sort:
  
 -@primes = (do (do $_ if .prime) for 1..100);
 +@primes = do $_ if prime($_) for 1..100;

  I haven't been following much, but I'm pretty sure this example now
contradicts what it was once intended to illustrate, as the entire
expression is no longer surrounded in any kind of bracket.

  Is the whole you-must-either clause now obsolete?  Then I won't
bother to suggest that the Y should be upcased. ;-)


Eirik
-- 
Boston's Irreversible Law of Clutter: 
 In any household, junk accumulates to fill the space available 
 for its storage. 

Re: r26938 - docs/Perl6/Spec

[John M. Dlugosz]

I fixed that today... will check in in a few hours.
It's harder to come up with a new example than to update syntax. :)

--John



Eirik Berg Hanssen Eirik-Berg.Hanssen-at-allverden.no |Perl 6| wrote:

pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl writes:

  

 statement, or if you want to attach multiple statements. you must either
 use the curly form or surround the entire expression in brackets of some sort:
 
-@primes = (do (do $_ if .prime) for 1..100);

+@primes = do $_ if prime($_) for 1..100;



  I haven't been following much, but I'm pretty sure this example now
contradicts what it was once intended to illustrate, as the entire
expression is no longer surrounded in any kind of bracket.

  Is the whole you-must-either clause now obsolete?  Then I won't
bother to suggest that the Y should be upcased. ;-)


Eirik