Re: S03- Unicode feed operator, no prefix:=

2009-06-11 Thread Timothy S. Nelson

On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, John M. Dlugosz wrote:

I have trouble using the arrow character in general.  It's because of the 
fonts:  they have such tiny heads the arrow doesn't show well at all, or 
match the surrounding character style.  So I tend to avoid them on web pages, 
and any document where I'm not fully controlling the font mapping and 
rendering.


	Allow me to mention that similar problems have existed for years in 
confusing '0' with 'O' and '1' with 'l' and 'I'.  Note that some fonts have 
been particularly designed to distinguish these well (mostly the fixed-width 
fonts that programmers use).  I would expect that similar well-distinguished 
fonts will appear as unicode becomes more popular.


HTH,


-
| Name: Tim Nelson | Because the Creator is,|
| E-mail: wayl...@wayland.id.au| I am   |
-

BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK
Version 3.12
GCS d+++ s+: a- C++$ U+++$ P+++$ L+++ E- W+ N+ w--- V- 
PE(+) Y+++ PGP-+++ R(+) !tv b++ DI D G+ e++ h! y-

-END GEEK CODE BLOCK-



S03- Unicode feed operator, no prefix:=

2009-06-10 Thread yary
I'm about halfway through reading Synopsis 3 and have a couple
comments/questions.

Is there, should there be unicode synonyms for the feed operators? eg
== is also ⇐ lArr;LEFTWARDS DOUBLE ARROW
== is also ⇒ rArr;RIGHTWARDS DOUBLE ARROW

I don't see as obvious candidates for == and ==, maybe LEFTWARDS ,
RIGHTWARDS TWO HEADED ARROW  ↞ and ↠. That's good in that the two
headed arrow looks like the angle brackets, but then the arrow shaft
isn't doubled, so it's more of a unicode synonym for --

In a different section, S03 says- In particular, you can say things
like C$array.'@' and C$fh.'=' to get the prefix form on the
operator. Hasn't prefix:= gone away for reading from filehandles?


Re: S03- Unicode feed operator, no prefix:=

2009-06-10 Thread Timothy S. Nelson

On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, yary wrote:


I'm about halfway through reading Synopsis 3 and have a couple
comments/questions.

Is there, should there be unicode synonyms for the feed operators? eg
== is also ? lArr; LEFTWARDS DOUBLE ARROW
== is also ? rArr; RIGHTWARDS DOUBLE ARROW

I don't see as obvious candidates for == and ==, maybe LEFTWARDS ,
RIGHTWARDS TWO HEADED ARROW  ? and ?. That's good in that the two
headed arrow looks like the angle brackets, but then the arrow shaft
isn't doubled, so it's more of a unicode synonym for --


	I admit I haven't been following recent discussion, but I've been 
presuming that use Unicode::Operators (or whatever we're calling it now) 
will be an external module, and as such, not in the spec.  Obviously there are 
some exceptions, such as those Unicode operators documented in the current 
specs.


HTH,


-
| Name: Tim Nelson | Because the Creator is,|
| E-mail: wayl...@wayland.id.au| I am   |
-

BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK
Version 3.12
GCS d+++ s+: a- C++$ U+++$ P+++$ L+++ E- W+ N+ w--- V- 
PE(+) Y+++ PGP-+++ R(+) !tv b++ DI D G+ e++ h! y-

-END GEEK CODE BLOCK-



Re: S03- Unicode feed operator, no prefix:=

2009-06-10 Thread John M. Dlugosz

yary not.com-at-gmail.com |Perl 6| wrote:

I'm about halfway through reading Synopsis 3 and have a couple
comments/questions.

Is there, should there be unicode synonyms for the feed operators? eg
== is also ⇐ lArr; LEFTWARDS DOUBLE ARROW
== is also ⇒ rArr; RIGHTWARDS DOUBLE ARROW

I don't see as obvious candidates for == and ==, maybe LEFTWARDS ,
RIGHTWARDS TWO HEADED ARROW  ↞ and ↠. That's good in that the two
headed arrow looks like the angle brackets, but then the arrow shaft
isn't doubled, so it's more of a unicode synonym for --
  
More Unicode operators will be available via modules or defining 
yourself.  It is an open issue as to making these true synonyms so MMD 
and people defining new forms of them don't have to worry about 
synonyms.  But, there will be a syntax for that, and everyone is welcome 
to make use of that and upload modules to do that.  Common use will 
emerge over time.





In a different section, S03 says- In particular, you can say things
like C$array.'@' and C$fh.'=' to get the prefix form on the
operator. Hasn't prefix:= gone away for reading from filehandles?

  


Correct.  You'll see a prefix = is not listed at the top of S03 for 
operators and their built-in use.  I'll come up with something better 
and check it in.


After the tornado is over ... I keep losing my connection.

--John


Re: S03- Unicode feed operator, no prefix:=

2009-06-10 Thread John M. Dlugosz

yary not.com-at-gmail.com |Perl 6| wrote:

I'm about halfway through reading Synopsis 3 and have a couple
comments/questions.

Is there, should there be unicode synonyms for the feed operators? eg
== is also ⇐ lArr; LEFTWARDS DOUBLE ARROW
== is also ⇒ rArr; RIGHTWARDS DOUBLE ARROW

I don't see as obvious candidates for == and ==, maybe LEFTWARDS ,
RIGHTWARDS TWO HEADED ARROW  ↞ and ↠. That's good in that the two
headed arrow looks like the angle brackets, but then the arrow shaft
isn't doubled, so it's more of a unicode synonym for --
  



I have trouble using the arrow character in general.  It's because of 
the fonts:  they have such tiny heads the arrow doesn't show well at 
all, or match the surrounding character style.  So I tend to avoid them 
on web pages, and any document where I'm not fully controlling the font 
mapping and rendering.


--John