Re: [Phono-L] The last word on Diamond Discs...I think

2009-12-27 Thread Zonophone2006
ger 
 
_Michigan Antique  Phonograph Society_ 
(http://www.michiganantiquephonographsociety.org/)  
 
you should go to one of the phono shows in the spring
there is one in wayne new jersey and i believe lynn bilton still has one in 
 connecticut about 50 mile south of you down rte 7
you may be able to find it on maps link
 
 
 
In a message dated 12/26/2009 10:14:36 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
ge...@comcast.net writes:

The poor  London model of Edison's Diamond Disc machine looks like it had 
been tortured.  The vertical section was there afterall, but a cable, wood 
block and some  other things (part going into the horn) were missing. Someone 
had SOLDERED the  horn on the top to another piece (sloppy shiney solder), I 
guess to keep it  from dragging...poor soul of a machine. My impression is 
that without ALL the  parts, there would be stress on both the record 
grooves and the diamond  reproducer, which would be forced to take on the 
burden 
of moving the heavy  pieces across the record...at least that's the way it 
seems to me.  

Needless to say, the machine still sits with the seller...who is now a  bit 
wiser, since I shared the photo and what I knew with her. She seemed not  
at all disappointed and actually fascinated to learn something about the poor 
 mess.

As for its WEIGHT. I've got an "AH-HAH!" I took the flashlight  and checked 
out the left side where the 24 slots for records was. I could see  that 2, 
that's TWO, thick metal weights were in place behind the slots. They  went 
across the back, one high, one low. This was probably to balance the  weight 
of the phono in the right-sided compartment. BOTH sides were equally  heavy, 
and I mean heavy! I could not lift one corner. Wow, was all I could  say.

But again. This was a fun adventure and learning experience which  didn't 
cost many bucks. It would not have been either without the help of this  
great group. :)

I will, however, now keep an eye out for an Edison  (table model) which 
could play my records! And I think I know a little bit  about how these 
machines work...not a lot, but enough probably to just get  into more trouble. 
LOL 
Oh, and I will wash the records with denatured alcohol  before I put them 
away. 

One last question on STORAGE: Store records  flat, right? 
But what do you put between them, and is a paper box OK  ?

Thank you  all,
Ger

___
Phono-L  mailing  list
http://phono-l.oldcrank.org


___
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.oldcrank.org


Re: [Phono-L] The last word on Diamond Discs...I think

2009-12-27 Thread bruce78rpm
Yes, those Edison Table models are few and far between, and because of that 
they can get pricey. I would suggest you send us some photos of what you 
described. Ron was correct on all counts. 
- Original Message - 
From: "DanKj"  
To: "Antique Phonograph List"  
Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2009 1:11:15 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] The last word on Diamond Discs...I think 

Too bad you didn't get some pics of it - I wanted to see what made it seem 
such a mess. The solder is supposed to be there, as Ron L'H said, and if 
there was anything running into the horn it was just a volume control, which 
I remove anyway because it muffles the sound. The straps behind the slots 
sound correct, too. Except for the missing grill, how bad is the cabinet? 

You might be disappointed to learn that the few Edison table models are 
less common than floor models and they're HEAVY, awkward things. My Chalet 
weighs about 70 pounds, and my B-80 nearly as much. 

- Original Message - 
From: "ger"  


> The poor London model of Edison's Diamond Disc machine looks like it had 
> been tortured. The vertical section was there afterall, but a cable, wood 
> block and some other things (part going into the horn) were missing. 
> Someone had SOLDERED the horn on th 
> 
> Needless to say, the machine still sits with the seller...who is now a bit 
> wiser, since I shared the photo and what I knew with her. She seemed not 
> at all disappointed and actually fascinated to learn something about the 
> poor mess. 
> 
> As for its WEIGHT. I've got an "AH-HAH!" I took the flashlight and checked 
> out the left side where the 24 slots for records was. I could see that 2, 
> that's TWO, thick metal weights were in place behind the slots. They went 
> across the back, one high, one low. \ 
> 
> 
> I will, however, now keep an eye out for an Edison (table model) which 
> could play my records 

___ 
Phono-L mailing list 
http://phono-l.oldcrank.org 
___
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.oldcrank.org


Re: [Phono-L] The last word on Diamond Discs...I think

2009-12-27 Thread DanKj
Too bad you didn't get some pics of it - I wanted to see what made it seem 
such a mess.   The solder is supposed to be there, as Ron L'H said, and if 
there was anything running into the horn it was just a volume control, which 
I remove anyway because it muffles the sound.  The straps behind the slots 
sound correct, too.  Except for the missing grill, how bad is the cabinet?


You might be disappointed to learn that the few Edison table models are 
less common than floor models and they're HEAVY, awkward things.  My Chalet 
weighs about 70 pounds, and my B-80 nearly as much.


- Original Message - 
From: "ger" 



The poor London model of Edison's Diamond Disc machine looks like it had 
been tortured. The vertical section was there afterall, but a cable, wood 
block and some other things (part going into the horn) were missing. 
Someone had SOLDERED the horn on th


Needless to say, the machine still sits with the seller...who is now a bit 
wiser, since I shared the photo and what I knew with her. She seemed not 
at all disappointed and actually fascinated to learn something about the 
poor mess.


As for its WEIGHT. I've got an "AH-HAH!" I took the flashlight and checked 
out the left side where the 24 slots for records was. I could see that 2, 
that's TWO, thick metal weights were in place behind the slots. They went 
across the back, one high, one low. \



I will, however, now keep an eye out for an Edison (table model) which 
could play my records 


___
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.oldcrank.org


Re: [Phono-L] The last word on Diamond Discs...I think

2009-12-27 Thread Tom Jordan
I found a BC 34 console phonograph many years ago stuffed in the back room
of an antique store with a bunch of old sewing machines.  They didn't know
what it was and sold it to me for $40.00.  It was first phonograph and it
got me started collecting.  I still listen to it today as I work in my home
office.
Tom

-Original Message-
From: phono-l-boun...@oldcrank.org [mailto:phono-l-boun...@oldcrank.org] On
Behalf Of DanKj
Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2009 12:11 PM
To: Antique Phonograph List
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] The last word on Diamond Discs...I think

 Too bad you didn't get some pics of it - I wanted to see what made it seem 
such a mess.   The solder is supposed to be there, as Ron L'H said, and if 
there was anything running into the horn it was just a volume control, which

I remove anyway because it muffles the sound.  The straps behind the slots 
sound correct, too.  Except for the missing grill, how bad is the cabinet?

 You might be disappointed to learn that the few Edison table models are 
less common than floor models and they're HEAVY, awkward things.  My Chalet 
weighs about 70 pounds, and my B-80 nearly as much.

- Original Message - 
From: "ger" 


> The poor London model of Edison's Diamond Disc machine looks like it had 
> been tortured. The vertical section was there afterall, but a cable, wood 
> block and some other things (part going into the horn) were missing. 
> Someone had SOLDERED the horn on th
>
> Needless to say, the machine still sits with the seller...who is now a bit

> wiser, since I shared the photo and what I knew with her. She seemed not 
> at all disappointed and actually fascinated to learn something about the 
> poor mess.
>
> As for its WEIGHT. I've got an "AH-HAH!" I took the flashlight and checked

> out the left side where the 24 slots for records was. I could see that 2, 
> that's TWO, thick metal weights were in place behind the slots. They went 
> across the back, one high, one low. \
>
>
> I will, however, now keep an eye out for an Edison (table model) which 
> could play my records 

___
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.oldcrank.org

___
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.oldcrank.org


Re: [Phono-L] The last word on Diamond Discs...I think

2009-12-27 Thread Dan K
Trudy the Angora Cat favors our BC for napping and watching the records 
spin.   Mine was way more than $40, but did come with an excellent 78/Pathe 
adapter & bonus crate of nice discs - and it's always interesting to see 
what constituted a vintage record collection.  Your find reminds me of my 
Brunswick - it was in the back room of a coin/stamp/45rpm store in the 
country outside of Buffalo.  They wanted $50, which I managed to raise 
(being 12 yrs old, when $50 wasn't to sneeze at) but I couldn't move it home 
right away. So, I gave them the money & took every part I could carry - 
reproducer, crank, all the old packs of needles, instruction books, even the 
turntable. Then I locked the lid  took the key.  Took me a month to convince 
my father to drive out there & haul the thing back .




- Original Message - 
From: "Tom Jordan" 

To: "'Antique Phonograph List'" 
Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2009 6:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] The last word on Diamond Discs...I think



I found a BC 34 console phonograph many years ago stuffed in the back room
of an antique store with a bunch of old sewing machines.  They didn't know
what it was and sold it to me for $40.00.  It was first phonograph and it
got me started collecting.  I still listen to it today as I work in my 
home

office.
Tom


___
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.oldcrank.org


[Phono-L] Edison BC-34

2009-12-27 Thread Andrew Baron
My first Edison was also a BC-34, first laid eyes on it in 1976 when I  
was 14, in the back of a pickup truck at a flea market.  Beautifully  
preserved original-finish machine with the bronze finish reproducer  
and metal parts.  It had the 10 and 12 buttons for stopping the  
reproducer at the ten or twelve inch start position.  I couldn't  
afford the $135 for the machine, so I bought several DD records.  It  
only took me a few seconds of trying to play one on my steel-needle  
machine at home, to realize that there was no choice but to go back  
and buy the machine.


I horse-traded whatever I owned and somehow raised the cash and went  
back the following weekend.  I found the seller but no BC-34.  Turns  
out he still had it and (for understandable reasons) decided not to  
cart it back to the flea.  I got directions to his house, and met up  
with him the next day.  I really had to twist my older brother's arm  
to allow me to put it in the back of his hatchback Mustang.  I can't  
imagine how we shoe-horned it in there, but somehow we did.  I'm sure  
I fussed about jamming cardboard everywhere, because we got it home  
without a scratch.


My big prize, and a red letter day in my early phonograph collecting  
life.  I played that machine incessantly.  Just a memory now, as it  
was destroyed in 1992 by Hurricane Andrew.  By that time, it was with  
a friend in Miami, as I had moved to Santa Fe 9 years earlier.


Andy Baron


On Dec 27, 2009, at 4:49 PM, Tom Jordan wrote:

I found a BC 34 console phonograph many years ago stuffed in the  
back room
of an antique store with a bunch of old sewing machines.  They  
didn't know
what it was and sold it to me for $40.00.  It was first phonograph  
and it
got me started collecting.  I still listen to it today as I work in  
my home

office.
Tom

-Original Message-
From: phono-l-boun...@oldcrank.org [mailto:phono-l-boun...@oldcrank.org 
] On

Behalf Of DanKj
Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2009 12:11 PM
To: Antique Phonograph List
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] The last word on Diamond Discs...I think

Too bad you didn't get some pics of it - I wanted to see what made  
it seem
such a mess.   The solder is supposed to be there, as Ron L'H said,  
and if
there was anything running into the horn it was just a volume  
control, which


I remove anyway because it muffles the sound.  The straps behind the  
slots
sound correct, too.  Except for the missing grill, how bad is the  
cabinet?


You might be disappointed to learn that the few Edison table models  
are
less common than floor models and they're HEAVY, awkward things.  My  
Chalet

weighs about 70 pounds, and my B-80 nearly as much.

- Original Message -
From: "ger" 


The poor London model of Edison's Diamond Disc machine looks like  
it had
been tortured. The vertical section was there afterall, but a  
cable, wood

block and some other things (part going into the horn) were missing.
Someone had SOLDERED the horn on th

Needless to say, the machine still sits with the seller...who is  
now a bit


wiser, since I shared the photo and what I knew with her. She  
seemed not
at all disappointed and actually fascinated to learn something  
about the

poor mess.

As for its WEIGHT. I've got an "AH-HAH!" I took the flashlight and  
checked


out the left side where the 24 slots for records was. I could see  
that 2,
that's TWO, thick metal weights were in place behind the slots.  
They went

across the back, one high, one low. \


I will, however, now keep an eye out for an Edison (table model)  
which

could play my records


___
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.oldcrank.org

___
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.oldcrank.org


___
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.oldcrank.org