Re: [PHP-DOC] ca3.php.net with print function
Jean-Sébastien Goupil wrote: Yo When searching for print function on ca3.php.net, it returns CSS... http://ca3.php.net/print returns : http://ca3.php.net/print.css other servers return the print function... What's wrong ? Miror specific problem? Maybe you should write to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Friedhelm
[PHP-DOC] Re: [PHP-NOTES] Note spam
[resend: not sure why this didn't make it through, yesterday; re-sending; sorry if it's a dupe -S] Nuno Lopes wrote: Well we have already tried a couple of methods but none of them worked so far, including DNS blacklists, spamassassin and a simple words blacklisting. I've run out of ideas. Training spamassassin would probably work, but I'm not sure if it wouldn't cause disturbs in the mail server. Did we drop the double opt-in idea? - User submits a note (with valid email address) - We send mail with a token URL - User clicks URL - Note is approved and posted Max 5 notes per address per day. Or x notes per domain/IP per day.. Yes, the evil side COULD be automated, but it's a lot more difficult than a simple post. S
[PHP-DOC] Re: [PHP-NOTES] Note spam
Nuno Lopes wrote: Well we have already tried a couple of methods but none of them worked so far, including DNS blacklists, spamassassin and a simple words blacklisting. I've run out of ideas. Training spamassassin would probably work, but I'm not sure if it wouldn't cause disturbs in the mail server. Did we drop the double opt-in idea? - User submits a note (with valid email address) - We send mail with a token URL - User clicks URL - Note is approved and posted Max 5 notes per address per day. Or x notes per domain/IP per day.. Yes, the evil side COULD be automated, but it's a lot more difficult than a simple post. S Well but who's gonna implement that? :) When will the to-be-approved list be cleaned? etc.. Nuno
Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: [PHP-NOTES] Note spam
Sean Coates wrote: [resend: not sure why this didn't make it through, yesterday; re-sending; sorry if it's a dupe -S] Nuno Lopes wrote: Well we have already tried a couple of methods but none of them worked so far, including DNS blacklists, spamassassin and a simple words blacklisting. I've run out of ideas. Training spamassassin would probably work, but I'm not sure if it wouldn't cause disturbs in the mail server. Did we drop the double opt-in idea? - User submits a note (with valid email address) - We send mail with a token URL - User clicks URL - Note is approved and posted Do we need to approve? I guess we have not enough man-power for that. Simply post the note after we receive the token. Max 5 notes per address per day. Or x notes per domain/IP per day.. x notes per domain/IP per day will for sure not work. Think of people behind proxies We should not limit the notes per day. To much to track, imho, no? Yes, the evil side COULD be automated, but it's a lot more difficult than a simple post. I like this proposal, but Nuno's point stands: who's gonna implement that? Friedhelm
Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: [PHP-NOTES] Note spam
Do we need to approve? I guess we have not enough man-power for that. Simply post the note after we receive the token. That's what I meant. Note is approved when the token URL is clicked. Max 5 notes per address per day. Or x notes per domain/IP per day.. x notes per domain/IP per day will for sure not work. Think of people behind proxies We should not limit the notes per day. To much to track, imho, no? I suspect that these spammers would just register example.com and create [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc. Yes, the evil side COULD be automated, but it's a lot more difficult than a simple post. I like this proposal, but Nuno's point stands: who's gonna implement that? Not sure. (-: I'd love to find time to do it, but I don't have it right now. Either way, notes are a mess. S
Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: [PHP-NOTES] Note spam
Sean Coates wrote: Do we need to approve? I guess we have not enough man-power for that. Simply post the note after we receive the token. That's what I meant. Note is approved when the token URL is clicked. Ah, sorry, my misunderestimating or something this way ;-) Max 5 notes per address per day. Or x notes per domain/IP per day.. x notes per domain/IP per day will for sure not work. Think of people behind proxies We should not limit the notes per day. To much to track, imho, no? I suspect that these spammers would just register example.com and create [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc. Yes, possible, but we can see and implement upperbound limit later ;-) Yes, the evil side COULD be automated, but it's a lot more difficult than a simple post. I like this proposal, but Nuno's point stands: who's gonna implement that? Not sure. (-: I'd love to find time to do it, but I don't have it right now. Either way, notes are a mess. Yes. Friedhelm
[PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/reference/outcontrol/functions ob-get-flush.xml
jsgoupilFri Mar 24 02:44:11 2006 UTC Modified files: /phpdoc/en/reference/outcontrol/functions ob-get-flush.xml Log: Typo http://cvs.php.net/viewcvs.cgi/phpdoc/en/reference/outcontrol/functions/ob-get-flush.xml?r1=1.3r2=1.4diff_format=u Index: phpdoc/en/reference/outcontrol/functions/ob-get-flush.xml diff -u phpdoc/en/reference/outcontrol/functions/ob-get-flush.xml:1.3 phpdoc/en/reference/outcontrol/functions/ob-get-flush.xml:1.4 --- phpdoc/en/reference/outcontrol/functions/ob-get-flush.xml:1.3 Fri Mar 11 16:11:51 2005 +++ phpdoc/en/reference/outcontrol/functions/ob-get-flush.xml Fri Mar 24 02:44:11 2006 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ ?xml version='1.0' encoding='iso-8859-1'? -!-- $Revision: 1.3 $ -- +!-- $Revision: 1.4 $ -- refentry id=function.ob-get-flush refnamediv refnameob_get_flush/refname @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ typestring/typemethodnameob_get_flush/methodname void/ /methodsynopsis -parafunctionob_get_flush/function flushs the output buffer, return +parafunctionob_get_flush/function flushes the output buffer, return it as a string and turns off output buffering. functionob_get_flush/function returns false; if no buffering is active.
