Re: [pinhole-discussion] Paper negative questions

2002-11-05 Thread George L Smyth
--- Andrew  Amundsen a...@tcinternet.net wrote:
 Hi everyone, I am freshly inspired after this weekends pinhole forum, hosted
 by Tom Miller and Bill Erikson, at the pARTs gallery in Minneapolis. Very
 nice job, hope to see more like it.
 
 I'm interested in trying paper negative work with pinhole. So I have a
 couple quick questions for those with paper negative experience:
 
 1) What brand of single weight photo paper has NO labeling on it's back?
 
 2) Does the Kodak name, from the back, show through on the final print when
 you print with that brand? or is it faint enough not to?

In my experience, I have never seen the Kodak logo.

 3) Which is best to use RC or fiber?

You want something that is going to make good contact when contact printing. 
Glossy RC will go firmly in contact when it is time to print.

 4) Any good starting exposures for brands of paper you might be familiar
 with?

Ilford MGIV EI2 would be a good starting point.

Cheers -

george

=
Handmade Photographic Images - http://GLSmyth.com
DRiP Investing - http://DRiPInvesting.org

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site
http://webhosting.yahoo.com/



Re: [pinhole-discussion] Paper negative questions

2002-11-05 Thread George L Smyth
--- Katharine Thayer ktha...@pacifier.com wrote:
 Andrew Amundsen wrote:
 
  
  1) What brand of single weight photo paper has NO labeling on it's back?
 
 Kodak single-weight paper has no labeling on the back.  

Keep in mind that single weight paper is going to curl like mad.

Cheers -

george

=
Handmade Photographic Images - http://GLSmyth.com
DRiP Investing - http://DRiPInvesting.org

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site
http://webhosting.yahoo.com/



Re: [pinhole-discussion] Does Pinhole-Discussion have an archive?

2002-11-05 Thread Gregg Kemp
Thanks for the reply, Guillermo.  And I agree about the earlier archive 
being easier to search than the more recent postings.  I hope to 
combine the two sometime next year into a single archive similar to the 
earlier one.


- Gregg

On Tuesday, November 5, 2002, at 04:12  PM, Guillermo wrote:



- Original Message -
From: Andrew Amundsen a...@tcinternet.net


...how do we access the archives? Could someone post a link?


Andrew:

You will see a link to the DISCUSSION page, at the foot of each 
posting, go

there and 3/4 down the page there is a link to archives. There are 2
categories of archived messages: those posted previous to 08/22/2000 
and

those posted after.  The former are easier to search than the latter,
unfortunately.

Guillermo





Re: [pinhole-discussion] Does Pinhole-Discussion have an archive?

2002-11-05 Thread Guillermo
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Amundsen a...@tcinternet.net

 ...how do we access the archives? Could someone post a link?

Andrew:

You will see a link to the DISCUSSION page, at the foot of each posting, go
there and 3/4 down the page there is a link to archives. There are 2
categories of archived messages: those posted previous to 08/22/2000 and
those posted after.  The former are easier to search than the latter,
unfortunately.

Guillermo




Re: [pinhole-discussion] Paper negative questions

2002-11-05 Thread Tom Miller
Hi Andrew,

Thank you for the kind comments.  There will be more forums (or fora,
for purists).

To tell the truth, I'm looking forward to seeing the answer to your
questions on which paper to use.  I still have a box or two of Ilford
Multigrade III RC matt, which was single-weight with no markings on
the back.  Ilford discontinued making matt RC when they brought out
Multigrade IV.  A loss for pinholers.

RC paper has the advantage of not curling.  Also, I've read that the
fiber texture in the paper can affect the print.

Tom

- Original Message -
From: Andrew Amundsen a...@tcinternet.net
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 1:16 PM
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Paper negative questions


 Hi everyone, I am freshly inspired after this weekends pinhole
forum, hosted
 by Tom Miller and Bill Erikson, at the pARTs gallery in Minneapolis.
Very
 nice job, hope to see more like it.

 I'm interested in trying paper negative work with pinhole. So I have
a
 couple quick questions for those with paper negative experience:

 1) What brand of single weight photo paper has NO labeling on it's
back?

 2) Does the Kodak name, from the back, show through on the final
print when
 you print with that brand? or is it faint enough not to?

 3) Which is best to use RC or fiber?

 4) Any good starting exposures for brands of paper you might be
familiar
 with?

 Well that will give me a good start, thanks for any help you can
pass on!

 Sincerly, Andrew Amundsen

 ___
 Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
 Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
 Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???
 unsubscribe or change your account at
 http://www.???/discussion/





Re: [pinhole-discussion] Paper negative questions

2002-11-05 Thread Katharine Thayer
Andrew Amundsen wrote:

 
 1) What brand of single weight photo paper has NO labeling on it's back?

Kodak single-weight paper has no labeling on the back.  

Katharine Thayer



Re: [pinhole-discussion] Paper negative questions

2002-11-05 Thread erickson
Thanks for the comment. I thought it was good too. Most folks like Ilford
paper. No, the kodak printing doesn't always come through, but you never can
tell. most folks use an ISo of 5 for starters. I've always used RC.
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Amundsen a...@tcinternet.net
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 1:16 PM
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Paper negative questions


 Hi everyone, I am freshly inspired after this weekends pinhole forum,
hosted
 by Tom Miller and Bill Erikson, at the pARTs gallery in Minneapolis. Very
 nice job, hope to see more like it.

 I'm interested in trying paper negative work with pinhole. So I have a
 couple quick questions for those with paper negative experience:

 1) What brand of single weight photo paper has NO labeling on it's back?

 2) Does the Kodak name, from the back, show through on the final print
when
 you print with that brand? or is it faint enough not to?

 3) Which is best to use RC or fiber?

 4) Any good starting exposures for brands of paper you might be familiar
 with?

 Well that will give me a good start, thanks for any help you can pass on!

 Sincerly, Andrew Amundsen

 ___
 Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
 Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
 Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???
 unsubscribe or change your account at
 http://www.???/discussion/