[pinhole-discussion] used enlargers

2002-05-22 Thread Leonard Peterson

Shannon Stoney  wrote:

I am looking for a used enlarger.  I looked on ebay and the good ones are
going for around $400-$500.  I wonder if anybody on this list has a favorite
place to buy used reconditioned enlargers?

Reply: I've been using an Omega D2 for years with a Zone VI cold light and 
it's fine.  I use it for 35mm to 4x5 enlargements and 8x10 contacts.  They 
are always offered on Ebay.  It's a real workhorse with few moving parts 
that can break.  Contact me for more info and advice.  Len


_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.




Re: [pinhole-discussion] used enlargers

2002-05-24 Thread D Hill

 Eric,
This sounds like a lens issue rather than a negative holder.  I have seen more 
than one D2 rigged up to 5x7, so I doubt that it is a negative covering 
problem.  If the mentioned glass sandwich you created does not project the 
entire sheet of film, or clips the corners, may I ask what the focal length of 
the lens you are using?  Quite possibly it may be too short to project the 
entire negative image.  Another possibility is that your supplementary 
condenser is in a wrong slot for your enlarging lens on the D2.  Hope this 
helps.  

Don

"Eric S. Theise"  wrote: 
D Hill writes:

> I'll second Len's advice on a used D2 - they may be a bit more
> expensive than other used enlargers but it quite possibly is the last
> enlarger you will ever buy.

Glad to see this thread; I have an enlarger-related question that I'm
sure can be answered by people on this list.

I shoot 4 x 5. I like printing the whole sheet of film, that is, all
the way to the edges, including where the film holder shows and the
identifying notches. But on most of the enlargers I've tried, including
Omegas, it's impossible to get the whole sheet. I've rigged up a glass
sandwich to hold the negative, but the apparatus still manages to roundly
clip off the corners.

Are there any 4 x 5 enlargers that will handle the full negative or do I
need to go to a larger size?

Thanks in advance, Eric

___
Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML 
Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???
unsubscribe or change your account at
http://www.???/discussion/


-
Do You Yahoo!?
LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience

RE: [pinhole-discussion] used enlargers

2002-05-23 Thread Andy Schmitt
owww am I jealous...I'm just starting down that rocky road now

-Original Message-
From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???
[mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of Eric S. Theise
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:48 PM
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] used enlargers


Andy Schmitt writes:
> Digital is cool...until you see the image size for a good 4x5 scan..
8o)

Hey, media is (are?) cheap.  And my Photoshop skills are orders of
magnitude better than whatever darkroom skills I may be said to possess.

--E

___
Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???
unsubscribe or change your account at
http://www.???/discussion/




Re: [pinhole-discussion] used enlargers

2002-05-23 Thread Eric S. Theise
Andy Schmitt writes:
> Digital is cool...until you see the image size for a good 4x5 scan.. 8o)

Hey, media is (are?) cheap.  And my Photoshop skills are orders of
magnitude better than whatever darkroom skills I may be said to possess.

--E



RE: [pinhole-discussion] used enlargers

2002-05-23 Thread Andy Schmitt
ow...(light bulb flashing) ... I see what you mean. hmmm I'll have to give
that a bit of thought. I was going to try it with a cold light head slightly
raised above the carrier due to my super duper custom filter carrier that I
built for my DII so I could do split filter printing...
Digital is cool...until you see the image size for a good 4x5 scan.. 8o)
keep in touch & let us know how this comes out..
andy


-Original Message-
From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???
[mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of Eric S. Theise
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:29 PM
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] used enlargers


Thanks for the tip, Andy, but I think you are missing my point.

Which is: the 4 x 5 enlargers I've used insist that 4 x 5 is the image
as framed in a negative carrier.  Once you get away from the negative
carrier, and try to print the whole negative, you'll find that the
diameter of the circular housing of the enlarger is too small to cover
the whole sheet, and you'll end up losing the corners of the negative.

At least that's been my experience on three different enlargers, and
I'm keen to know if there are 4 x 5 enlargers that have a large enough
head to encircle the whole 4 x 5 negative.

As to a carrier, I just got two sheets of glass, had the edges smoothed
out by the supplier, and hinged them with gaffers tape.  That part
worked fine.  I was just losing my corners (and my mind).

Another reason why digital is looking better and better.

Thanks, Eric

___
Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???
unsubscribe or change your account at
http://www.???/discussion/




Re: [pinhole-discussion] used enlargers

2002-05-23 Thread Eric S. Theise
Thanks for the tip, Andy, but I think you are missing my point.

Which is: the 4 x 5 enlargers I've used insist that 4 x 5 is the image
as framed in a negative carrier.  Once you get away from the negative
carrier, and try to print the whole negative, you'll find that the
diameter of the circular housing of the enlarger is too small to cover
the whole sheet, and you'll end up losing the corners of the negative.

At least that's been my experience on three different enlargers, and
I'm keen to know if there are 4 x 5 enlargers that have a large enough
head to encircle the whole 4 x 5 negative.

As to a carrier, I just got two sheets of glass, had the edges smoothed
out by the supplier, and hinged them with gaffers tape.  That part
worked fine.  I was just losing my corners (and my mind).

Another reason why digital is looking better and better.

Thanks, Eric



RE: [pinhole-discussion] used enlargers

2002-05-23 Thread Andy Schmitt
Eric
get yourself some anti-Newton glass bigger than the negative & 1/4" marine
plywood (no voids). Cut out the wood bigger than the negative (but smaller
than the glass...) on 2 pieces. Cut the wood to fit your enlarger. I would
flat black the wood after you smooth it out.
If you want to be fancy you could route out the plywood so the glass is
nestled inside it on each side... a hinge to keep it aligned might be a good
thought too...
I'm going to do one this summer so let me know how you come out...& I'll do
the same.
have fun
andy

-Original Message-
From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???
[mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of Eric S. Theise
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:10 PM
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] used enlargers


D Hill writes:

>  I'll second Len's advice on a used D2 - they may be a bit more
> expensive than other used enlargers but it quite possibly is the last
> enlarger you will ever buy.

Glad to see this thread; I have an enlarger-related question that I'm
sure can be answered by people on this list.

I shoot 4 x 5.  I like printing the whole sheet of film, that is, all
the way to the edges, including where the film holder shows and the
identifying notches.  But on most of the enlargers I've tried, including
Omegas, it's impossible to get the whole sheet.  I've rigged up a glass
sandwich to hold the negative, but the apparatus still manages to roundly
clip off the corners.

Are there any 4 x 5 enlargers that will handle the full negative or do I
need to go to a larger size?

Thanks in advance, Eric

_




Re: [pinhole-discussion] used enlargers

2002-05-23 Thread G.Penate
- Original Message -
From: "Eric S. Theise" 

> Are there any 4 x 5 enlargers that will handle the full negative or do I
> need to go to a larger size?

Yes, a 5x7 would do what you want.  A cheap option, if you can find one, is an
old 5x7 Elwood

Guillermo





Re: [pinhole-discussion] used enlargers

2002-05-23 Thread Eric S. Theise
D Hill writes:

>  I'll second Len's advice on a used D2 - they may be a bit more
> expensive than other used enlargers but it quite possibly is the last
> enlarger you will ever buy.

Glad to see this thread; I have an enlarger-related question that I'm
sure can be answered by people on this list.

I shoot 4 x 5.  I like printing the whole sheet of film, that is, all
the way to the edges, including where the film holder shows and the
identifying notches.  But on most of the enlargers I've tried, including
Omegas, it's impossible to get the whole sheet.  I've rigged up a glass
sandwich to hold the negative, but the apparatus still manages to roundly
clip off the corners.

Are there any 4 x 5 enlargers that will handle the full negative or do I
need to go to a larger size?

Thanks in advance, Eric



RE: [pinhole-discussion] used enlargers

2002-05-23 Thread Andy Schmitt
This is why I asked for an approximate location Peters Valley might have
a modified DII - D2 we would be willing to part with for less than Ebay
prices..
8o)
andy

-Original Message-
From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???
[mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of I Zarkov
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 9:10 AM
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] used enlargers


I agreee totally about getting an Omega D series enlarger. I've had a D2V
for about 20 years now and it's still great. Just found a point source head
for it and will be printing electron microscope negatives. Extremely
versatile assortment of heads: cold light, condenser, color fits many needs,
worth the cost. IF you want to enlarges neg to larger dimensions get the
longer column.
Always good to look locally if you can to avoid higher shipping costs. Save
the $ and invest in a good lens. Look for a package deal as the additional
parts- negative holders, lens cones, replacement condensers can get a bit
pricey if bought separately. I found it cheaper to have a machine shop cut
me neagive carriers than pay the photo-shop price.
Good luck,
Z

_
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com


___
Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???
unsubscribe or change your account at
http://www.???/discussion/




Re: [pinhole-discussion] used enlargers

2002-05-23 Thread I Zarkov
I agreee totally about getting an Omega D series enlarger. I've had a D2V 
for about 20 years now and it's still great. Just found a point source head 
for it and will be printing electron microscope negatives. Extremely 
versatile assortment of heads: cold light, condenser, color fits many needs, 
worth the cost. IF you want to enlarges neg to larger dimensions get the 
longer column.
Always good to look locally if you can to avoid higher shipping costs. Save 
the $ and invest in a good lens. Look for a package deal as the additional 
parts- negative holders, lens cones, replacement condensers can get a bit 
pricey if bought separately. I found it cheaper to have a machine shop cut 
me neagive carriers than pay the photo-shop price.

Good luck,
Z

_
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com




Re: [pinhole-discussion] used enlargers

2002-05-23 Thread DAlfrey
In a message dated 5/22/02 11:05:50 PM Central Daylight Time, 
zopp...@yahoo.com writes:

>  am looking for a used enlarger. I looked on ebay and the good ones are
>  going for around $400-$500. I wonder if anybody on this list has a favorite
>  place to buy used reconditioned enlargers?
>  
check http;//www.cameras.com , its the web site for EP Levine in Boston, I 
order from them all the time, and usually get stuff in about  5-7 days max ,.

Also check http://www.mpex.com (Midwest Photo Exchange) again another fine 
place to find stuff, in both places, E P Levine and MPE , the sales folks are 
of great help., at EP Levine , ask for Steve or Jill, and at MPE ask for Tom, 
.. 

Good Luck. 



Re: [pinhole-discussion] used enlargers

2002-05-22 Thread D Hill

 I'll second Len's advice on a used D2 - they may be a bit more expensive than 
other used enlargers but it quite possibly is the last enlarger you will ever 
buy.
Don
  Leonard Peterson  wrote: Shannon Stoney wrote:

I am looking for a used enlarger. I looked on ebay and the good ones are
going for around $400-$500. I wonder if anybody on this list has a favorite
place to buy used reconditioned enlargers?

Reply: I've been using an Omega D2 for years with a Zone VI cold light and 
it's fine. I use it for 35mm to 4x5 enlargements and 8x10 contacts. They 
are always offered on Ebay. It's a real workhorse with few moving parts 
that can break. Contact me for more info and advice. Len

_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.


___
Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML 
Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???
unsubscribe or change your account at
http://www.???/discussion/


-
Do You Yahoo!?
LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience