Re: [PLUG] Best File Format for OOo Writer <=> MS Word Collaboration?

2012-02-02 Thread Michael M. Moore
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Richard C. Steffens  wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Richard England  
>> wrote:
>> Interesting. I was just corresponding this morning with a new Ubuntu
>> user who was telling me that she couldn't find the option to save in
>> *.doc format in LibreOffice. I wonder if Ubuntu's version is behind
>> Fedora and doesn't have that capability, or if she just couldn't find
>> where to do it? (I don't know her well, but I get the distinct
>> impression her computer skills are not highly developed.) I suggested
>> to her she might check into installing OpenOffice.org, but perhaps
>> that isn't necessary.
>
> Could she have been thinking it would be an export type of function
> under the File menu?

Thanks, Dick.  I told her where I thought it would be, based on where
it is in OpenOffice, and what you're describing sounds like a very
similar location.  I'll pass along your description and see if that
helps her.

Michael
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Best File Format for OOo Writer <=> MS Word Collaboration?

2012-02-01 Thread Richard C. Steffens
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Richard England  
> wrote:
> Interesting. I was just corresponding this morning with a new Ubuntu 
> user who was telling me that she couldn't find the option to save in 
> *.doc format in LibreOffice. I wonder if Ubuntu's version is behind 
> Fedora and doesn't have that capability, or if she just couldn't find 
> where to do it? (I don't know her well, but I get the distinct 
> impression her computer skills are not highly developed.) I suggested 
> to her she might check into installing OpenOffice.org, but perhaps 
> that isn't necessary.

Could she have been thinking it would be an export type of function 
under the File menu?

Tell her it's in the dialog box that opens when she tells Libre Office 
to save the file. There is a line that says, "File Type" and has a 
little arrowhead pointing to the right. If she clicks on that line the 
arrow head changes to pointing down and there is the list of all the 
available file types. My Ubuntu installation of Libre Office has options 
for saving as a .doc in MS Word 97/2000/XP or MS Word 95. There are also 
options for saving as MS Word 2003 XML (.xml) and MS Word 2007 XML 
(.docx). These are lower in the list, and not adjacent to the .doc 
options. Perhaps that's why she couldn't find .doc.

Another possibility is that she was looking for the way to tell Libre 
Office to always save a file as .doc. This is under the Tools > Options 
menu in the Load/Save section. The extensions are not shown, but the one 
she probably would want is MS Word 97/2000/XP. In this tool all the MS 
file type options are grouped together. It might have been confusing to 
her because the file extensions are not shown.

-- 
Regards,

Dick Steffens


___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Best File Format for OOo Writer <=> MS Word Collaboration?

2012-02-01 Thread Michael M. Moore
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Richard England  wrote:
>
> FWIW, I regularly use LibreOffice 3.3.4 on my Fedora system to open
> received .docx files for my wife and save them in Word97 .doc files so
> she can edit them. She has been successful sharing these with
> colleagues.  She uses the equation editor, but not the change tracking
> features you mention.  I think investigation would be worth your time.

Interesting.  I was just corresponding this morning with a new Ubuntu
user who was telling me that she couldn't find the option to save in
*.doc format in LibreOffice.  I wonder if Ubuntu's version is behind
Fedora and doesn't have that capability, or if she just couldn't find
where to do it?  (I don't know her well, but I get the distinct
impression her computer skills are not highly developed.)  I suggested
to her she might check into installing OpenOffice.org, but perhaps
that isn't necessary.

Michael
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Best File Format for OOo Writer <=> MS Word Collaboration?

2012-02-01 Thread Rich Shepard
On Wed, 1 Feb 2012, j...@sdf.org wrote:

> MS Word 97/2000/XP (.doc)

   Oops! Didn't see this before my first response. I use this with all my
clients, even when they send me a .docx file.

Rich
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Best File Format for OOo Writer <=> MS Word Collaboration?

2012-02-01 Thread Rich Shepard
On Wed, 1 Feb 2012, j...@sdf.org wrote:

> I'm trying to help out a first-time author using OOo Writer 3.2.0 on Ubuntu
> 10.4 who needs to collaborate with a book editor using MS Word, probably
> the 2007 version on Windows 7.

   .doc

Rich
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Best File Format for OOo Writer <=> MS Word Collaboration?

2012-02-01 Thread Richard England
Try the latest version that is available and also try LibreOffice 
(www.*libreoffice*.org) There have been numerous changes made since the 
fork to LibreOffice.

FWIW, I regularly use LibreOffice 3.3.4 on my Fedora system to open 
received .docx files for my wife and save them in Word97 .doc files so 
she can edit them. She has been successful sharing these with 
colleagues.  She uses the equation editor, but not the change tracking 
features you mention.  I think investigation would be worth your time.

~~R


On 02/01/2012 09:03 AM, j...@sdf.org wrote:
> Greetings PLUGers,
> I'm trying to help out a first-time author using OOo Writer 3.2.0 on Ubuntu
> 10.4 who needs to collaborate with a book editor using MS Word, probably
> the 2007 version on Windows 7.  Ideally, the book editor would be using
> the "Record Changes" feature in Word, then forwarding it back for the author
> to run "Edit>Accept or Reject Changes" on. Probably several rounds of this
> sort of thing on an approx. 400 page book.  Alternately, it appears both
> programs can also merge differences via the "Compare Files" feature which
> avoids having to deal with externally-generated "diffs" as with "Record
> Changes".
>
> Anyways, my simple single page tests using the .rtf format were a mixed
> bag, sometimes resulting in file corruption.  The .doc format seems to be
> more robust over several rounds of changes.  However, there are several
> Word versions available under "File>Save As>File Type" and I'm wondering
> which is most likely to be best for this project?
>
> OOo "Save As>File Type" choices:
>
> MS Word 6.0 (.doc)
> MS Word 95 (.doc)
> MS Word 97/2000/XP (.doc)
> MS Word 2003 (.xml)
> MS Word 2007 (.docx)  ## I think this is read-only so a non-starter
>
> I've not tested OpenDocument Text (.fodt) or DocBook (.xml).
>
> I am aware of the ODF Converter module for MS Office however it didn't
> perform well in my tests which featured frequent MS Word (earlier 2000
> version) crashes whenever an .odt file was opened.
>
> My guess is MS Word 97/2000/XP is the best candidate but I'd like to get
> some real-world feedback before committing.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jeff W
>
> ___
> PLUG mailing list
> PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
> http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug

___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Best File Format for OOo Writer <=> MS Word Collaboration?

2012-02-01 Thread Rogan Creswick
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:03 AM,   wrote:
> Greetings PLUGers,
> I'm trying to help out a first-time author using OOo Writer 3.2.0 on Ubuntu
> 10.4 who needs to collaborate with a book editor using MS Word, probably
> the 2007 version on Windows 7.  Ideally, the book editor would be using
> the "Record Changes" feature in Word, then forwarding it back for the author
> to run "Edit>Accept or Reject Changes" on. Probably several rounds of this
> sort of thing on an approx. 400 page book.  Alternately, it appears both
> programs can also merge differences via the "Compare Files" feature which
> avoids having to deal with externally-generated "diffs" as with "Record
> Changes".

I can't caution /against/ this enough.

OO has a long and distinguished history or corrupting documents in
many ugly ways.  Often, this corruption only appears once the document
is loaded in Word.  eg: Everything will look peachy to the
linux/OO.org user, then the client (or in this case, publisher) will
see something that looks like it went through a blender.

This might work if you don't have any formatting or images (eg: if
you're essentially sending a text document), but given that Word is
even in the picture, I suspect that that is not the case.

The publisher may offer other formats that are acceptable, such as
LaTeX or DocBook.  Those technologies have strong support on a number
of platforms, and offer a better solution.  If Word is a requirement,
then I strongly recommend setting up a VM with Word installed, and
accessing it via VirtualBox.  It will cost $200-300 in licensing, but
you'll save days of frustration.

Anyhow, be very cautious with converting from OO -> Word; in my
experience, what you see in OO has little relation to what shows up in
Word.  If you must do it this way, then find a copy of word to at
least preview the deliverables before sending them off.

--Rogan

> Anyways, my simple single page tests using the .rtf format were a mixed
> bag, sometimes resulting in file corruption.  The .doc format seems to be
> more robust over several rounds of changes.  However, there are several
> Word versions available under "File>Save As>File Type" and I'm wondering
> which is most likely to be best for this project?
>
> OOo "Save As>File Type" choices:
>
> MS Word 6.0 (.doc)
> MS Word 95 (.doc)
> MS Word 97/2000/XP (.doc)
> MS Word 2003 (.xml)
> MS Word 2007 (.docx)  ## I think this is read-only so a non-starter
>
> I've not tested OpenDocument Text (.fodt) or DocBook (.xml).
>
> I am aware of the ODF Converter module for MS Office however it didn't
> perform well in my tests which featured frequent MS Word (earlier 2000
> version) crashes whenever an .odt file was opened.
>
> My guess is MS Word 97/2000/XP is the best candidate but I'd like to get
> some real-world feedback before committing.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jeff W
>
> ___
> PLUG mailing list
> PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
> http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug