CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports
CVSROOT:/cvs Module name:ports Changes by: st...@cvs.openbsd.org 2009/06/27 15:48:47 Modified files: net/transmission: Makefile Added files: net/transmission/patches: patch-third-party_libnatpmp_getgateway_c Log message: in the UPnP code, skip over route socket messages with the wrong rtm_version; didn't break anything for naddy@, it still reported that it had successfully negotiated port forwarding with his printer, just as before ;-)
CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports
CVSROOT:/cvs Module name:ports Changes by: will...@cvs.openbsd.org 2009/06/27 20:37:39 Modified files: www/phpmyadmin : Tag: OPENBSD_4_5 Makefile distinfo Log message: SECURITY FIX: Setup script used to generate configuration can be fooled using a crafted POST request to include arbitrary PHP code in generated configuration file. Combined with ability to save files on server, this can allow unauthenticated users to execute arbitrary PHP code. http://www.phpmyadmin.net/home_page/security/PMASA-2009-3.php ok robert@
CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports
CVSROOT:/cvs Module name:ports Changes by: will...@cvs.openbsd.org 2009/06/27 21:03:09 Modified files: www/apache-httpd: Tag: OPENBSD_4_5 Makefile distinfo www/apache-httpd/pkg: Tag: OPENBSD_4_5 PLIST Log message: SECURITY FIX MFC: Update to apache-httpd-2.2.11. Lots of bugfixes and a security fix for CVE-2008-2939. ok robert@
CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports
CVSROOT:/cvs Module name:ports Changes by: will...@cvs.openbsd.org 2009/06/27 21:18:56 Modified files: security/cyrus-sasl2: Tag: OPENBSD_4_5 Makefile Added files: security/cyrus-sasl2/patches: Tag: OPENBSD_4_5 patch-lib_saslutil_c Log message: SECURITY FIX Resolve CVE-2009-0688: unsafe use of sasl_encode64() ok robert@
CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports
CVSROOT:/cvs Module name:ports Changes by: will...@cvs.openbsd.org 2009/06/27 21:38:54 Modified files: databases/mysql: Tag: OPENBSD_4_5 Makefile distinfo databases/mysql/patches: Tag: OPENBSD_4_5 patch-configure_in patch-innobase_Makefile_in patch-mysql-test_Makefile_in patch-scripts_Makefile_in patch-sql_mysqld_cc databases/mysql/pkg: Tag: OPENBSD_4_5 PLIST-tests Log message: SECURITY FIX MFC: Bug fix update to MySQL 5.0.83. From Brad (maintainer). ok robert@
CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports
CVSROOT:/cvs Module name:ports Changes by: will...@cvs.openbsd.org 2009/06/27 21:53:17 Modified files: print/cups : Tag: OPENBSD_4_5 Makefile Added files: print/cups/patches: Tag: OPENBSD_4_5 patch-backend_snmp_c patch-cgi-bin_search_c patch-cups_auth_c patch-cups_ipp_c patch-cups_ipp_h patch-filter_hpgl-attr_c patch-filter_hpgl-input_c patch-filter_hpgltops_h patch-filter_image-gif_c patch-filter_image-png_c patch-filter_image-private_h patch-filter_image-sgilib_c patch-filter_textcommon_c patch-filter_texttops_c patch-scheduler_dirsvc_c patch-scheduler_ipp_c Log message: SECURITY FIX Resolve these, from debian: CVE-2007-4351 CVE-2007-5849 CVE-2007-6358 CVE-2008-0047 CVE-2008-0053 CVE-2008-0882 CVE-2008-1373 CVE-2008-1722, plus integer overflow patch from L2974: _cupsImageReadPNG() CVE-2008-3639 CVE-2008-3640 CVE-2008-3641, without SP_select_pen() in STR #2911, and fix an additional off-by-one (STR #2966) CVE-2009-0163 CVE-2009-0949 ok robert@
Re: opera 10 beta with unite
Aaron W. Hsu arcf...@sacrideo.us wrote: On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:39:58 -0400, frantisek holop min...@obiit.org wrote: i wonder how many people use opera on openbsd... I wonder how many people would use it if there were a native build with a proper license that would permit redistribution of the packages and such on CD-ROM. Would these packages be distributed with the CDs? Aaron W. Hsu What are you talking about? Opera is a proprietary close source software. It would take a lot more than change of license for Opera to be available on CD. It has to be Open Source project. My crystal ball is telling me Opera is not going open source any time soon. I would be happy to sign your petition for the native build of Opera for OpenBSD. I do fell little bit claustrophobic having only choice of Firefox and Konqueror. I hope by 1st of November Midori gets better but WebKit is the most insecure of four search engines. I am also really curious how would native build work on bsd.mp kernel. Did anybody try to use tiny-proxy+Opera on bsd.mp? Does tiny-proxy solve the problem of locking? In my experience that seems to be the issue with bsd.mp and linux comp rather than with Opera per say. Is it possible to use native aspell with Opera? I didn't see the Linux version of aspell available among ports but installing Linux version of aspell shouldn't be too difficult. Cheers, Predrag
Re: opera 10 beta with unite
--- On Sat, 6/27/09, frantisek holop min...@obiit.org wrote: i wonder how many people use opera on openbsd... I use Opera more instances (xauth). I read it very sorry, that Linux compat and so Opera in this form has not future. Can i receive a little bit more technical reason behind this? I have not found other useable browser, just Opera. From that matter i tried 4440 and 4449 also. Port is good. Opera is broadly speaking works. Old RSS feed list is right, but with _old_ RSS messages I not thriven eighter with export/import, nor with copy mail/ directory. Thanks for the work.
Re: opera 10 beta with unite
On 2009/06/27 04:39, frantisek holop wrote: hmm, on Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 06:02:12PM -0600, Duncan Patton a Campbell said that It would be nice to have Opera without the Linux baggage. Who would I nag at Opera for this to be accomplished? now before the release probably nobody :] last thing on their mind is to support more builds when they just finished with gcc2.95 as well. i'll be writing some people after the release is done. i wonder how many people use opera on openbsd... Fewer than the number of people who would use it if worked on amd64 and MP machines running OpenBSD. Last time I used Opera I quite liked it but I'm not going to switch browsers when I switch OS arch (e.g. between my i386 laptop and my main machine which runs amd64), I just don't see enough benefits to do this for a web browser. (textmaker/planmaker is a different story though :-) On 2009/06/27 02:40, Aaron W. Hsu wrote: I wonder how many people would use it if there were a native build with a proper license that would permit redistribution of the packages and such on CD-ROM. Would these packages be distributed with the CDs? Asking them to change license while also asking to provide binaries for another OS is far too much in one go. Besides, adding a new OS is just a technical and support issue, changing license is a very pervasive legal issue, often involving contracts with other companies etc. Usually a much more difficult thing to get changed. On 2009/06/27 03:16, Predrag Punosevac wrote: Aaron W. Hsu arcf...@sacrideo.us wrote: On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:39:58 -0400, frantisek holop min...@obiit.org wrote: i wonder how many people use opera on openbsd... I wonder how many people would use it if there were a native build with a proper license that would permit redistribution of the packages and such on CD-ROM. Would these packages be distributed with the CDs? Aaron W. Hsu What are you talking about? Opera is a proprietary close source software. It would take a lot more than change of license for Opera to be available on CD. It has to be Open Source project. It is up to the people building CDs to decide what they want to include. I think we may have some things in tools/ without source, though it's such a fiddle to find a working cdrom drive (I net-boot everything) that I can't check that easily. :-)
4.5-stable net/samba samba-3.0.34p0 update
Update for net/samba to samba-3.0.34p0. Builds upon my previous patch set for Back port from current minus the WANTLIB changes for current cups.. NOTE the patch is against a fresh net/samba OPENBSD_4_5 tagged tree and not incremental to my previous patch for samba. Fixes this time round for CVE-2009-1888. See http://us6.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2009-1888.html for further details use patch -E The following patch is added. patch-smbd_posix_acls_c Ian McWilliam samba.diff Description: Binary data
Re: opera 10 beta with unite
it's raining builds... build 4453 is here. i have kept the other build numbers in the makefile so it's easy to back if necessary. regarding the comments: opera is commercial software. there is no point in asking for a change of license or to go open source. if that is a showstopper for you, then opera is not for you. it is nobody's business telling others what license/development model they should use. hell, even their bug database isn't public. take it or leave it. yes, a native build would be nice, but with all the architectures openbsd supports i dont see it happening soon... i think the best case scenario would be opera-i386 only, if ever. there are freebsd builds, but there are no netbsd builds either -- maybe because the license explicitly forbids running opera on anything else than a pc... oh, btw the new line uses hunspell instead of aspell iirc. after they get back their lives after the release, i plan to write to the unix department to get their take on the matter. so why bother with opera at all? because i am on i386 most of the time. because even as a linux binay it beats the hell out of firefox 3.* (3.5 pending). because it's a brilliant piece of program for power users. where the 10 line will end up remains to be seen. opera has a history of rushed releases as well, and it might take until 10.50 to get a polished product like 9.64. -f -- i'm here to question all your answers. opera10.tgz Description: application/tar-gz
DESM Newsletter No. 101 - Notebooks and Netbooks Crazy Offers!!
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
MAINTAINER-UPDATE: print/latex-mk
Hello,
here is a trivial update to print/latex-mk.
If you have no regressions either please commit.
Regards,
ahb
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/print/latex-mk/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -u -r1.3 Makefile
--- Makefile1 Oct 2007 11:42:30 - 1.3
+++ Makefile27 Jun 2009 12:03:21 -
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
COMMENT= set of Makefile fragments to manage LaTeX documents
-DISTNAME= latex-mk-1.8
+DISTNAME= latex-mk-1.9.1
CATEGORIES=print
HOMEPAGE= http://latex-mk.sourceforge.net/
Index: distinfo
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/print/latex-mk/distinfo,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -u -r1.2 distinfo
--- distinfo5 Apr 2007 16:20:19 - 1.2
+++ distinfo27 Jun 2009 12:03:21 -
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-MD5 (latex-mk-1.8.tar.gz) = fqCaGoJz4/DwJsuU8U0iMQ==
-RMD160 (latex-mk-1.8.tar.gz) = OwHSDtKsSNgONvS0rfhCZb/TfZg=
-SHA1 (latex-mk-1.8.tar.gz) = QCJlzZ2KtY0ZQUaZDnD4yCmb5rk=
-SHA256 (latex-mk-1.8.tar.gz) = UZlSUI9QWdZ2qwZ0tFid1C+wIAReT/V01eoVmeJNNvU=
-SIZE (latex-mk-1.8.tar.gz) = 560753
+MD5 (latex-mk-1.9.1.tar.gz) = GKvojOVypSXAXSSaJ3ScwQ==
+RMD160 (latex-mk-1.9.1.tar.gz) = VjanpBJhAFq26fOFiQ0+FfmE430=
+SHA1 (latex-mk-1.9.1.tar.gz) = yOZ9EGPaVVe2wltVM3isKbc0chk=
+SHA256 (latex-mk-1.9.1.tar.gz) = pmzHAjxFYxo8MJkeTjlKILrFXlIoq9iGaQY882W39ao=
+SIZE (latex-mk-1.9.1.tar.gz) = 579556
Index: patches/patch-latex_mk_in_in
===
RCS file: patches/patch-latex_mk_in_in
diff -N patches/patch-latex_mk_in_in
--- patches/patch-latex_mk_in_in31 Jan 2007 22:38:03 - 1.1.1.1
+++ /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -
@@ -1,58 +0,0 @@
-$OpenBSD: patch-latex_mk_in_in,v 1.1.1.1 2007/01/31 22:38:03 steven Exp $
-
-adds DVIPS_ENV functionality.
-
latex.mk.in.in.origTue Jan 30 21:38:37 2007
-+++ latex.mk.in.in Tue Jan 30 21:42:32 2007
-@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@
- # DVIPDFM_ENV = environment variables set when running the dvipdfm
executable
- # DVIPDFM_FLAGS= flags passed to the dvipdfm executable
- # DVIPS = the dvips executable
-+# DVIPS_ENV = environment variables set when running the dvips executable
- # DVIPS_FLAGS= flags passed to the dvips executable
- # GZIP = gzip program
- # GV = a postscript previewer executable
-@@ -145,6 +146,7 @@ DVIPDFM_ENV?=
- DVIPDFM_FLAGS+=
- DVIPDFM_LANDSCAPE_FLAGS?= -l
- DVIPS?= @DVIPS@
-+DVIPS_ENV?=
- DVIPS_FLAGS+= -j0
- DVIPS_LANDSCAPE_FLAGS?= -t landscape
- ECHO?=@ECHO@
-@@ -473,7 +475,7 @@ BMK:DEFAULTVIEWPS_DRAFT?= viewps_${__tmp
- BMK:ALLVIEWPS_DRAFT+= viewps_${__tmp__}-draft
- BMK:${__tmp__}-draft.ps: ${__tmp__}.dvi ${DATED_DRAFT_PS}
- BMK: sed s;DATE;`date`;g ${DATED_DRAFT_PS:Q} ${DRAFT_STAMP_PS:Q}
--BMK: ${DVIPS:Q} -h ${DRAFT_STAMP_PS:Q} ${DVIPS_FLAGS} -o $@ ${__tmp__}.dvi
-+BMK: ${ENV_PROG:Q} ${DVIPS_ENV} ${DVIPS:Q} -h ${DRAFT_STAMP_PS:Q}
${DVIPS_FLAGS} -o $@ ${__tmp__}.dvi
- BMK:.endfor
-
- GMK:define viewps_template
-@@ -489,7 +491,7 @@ GMK:DEFAULTVIEWPS_DRAFT?= viewps_$(1)-dr
- GMK:ALLVIEWPS_DRAFT+= viewps_$(1)-draft
- GMK:$(1)-draft.ps: $(1).dvi ${DATED_DRAFT_PS}
- GMK: sed s;DATE;`date`;g ${DATED_DRAFT_PS} ${DRAFT_STAMP_PS}
--GMK: $(DVIPS) -h ${DRAFT_STAMP_PS} $(DVIPS_FLAGS) -o $@ $(1).dvi
-+GMK: $(ENV_PROG) $(DVIPS_ENV) $(DVIPS) -h ${DRAFT_STAMP_PS} $(DVIPS_FLAGS)
-o $@ $(1).dvi
- GMK:endef
- GMK:$(foreach __tmp__,$(NAME),$(eval $(call viewps_template,$(__tmp__
-
-@@ -960,13 +962,13 @@ GMK:endif
- BMK:.if defined(__DRAFT)
- GMK:ifdef __DRAFT
- GMK: sed s;DATE;`date`;g ${DATED_DRAFT_PS} ${DRAFT_STAMP_PS}
--GMK $(DVIPS) -h ${DRAFT_STAMP_PS} $(DVIPS_FLAGS) -o $*-draft.ps $
-+GMK: $(ENV_PROG) $(DVIPS_ENV) $(DVIPS) -h ${DRAFT_STAMP_PS} $(DVIPS_FLAGS)
-o $*-draft.ps $
- BMK: sed s;DATE;`date`;g ${DATED_DRAFT_PS:Q} ${DRAFT_STAMP_PS:Q}
--BMK: ${DVIPS:Q} -h ${DRAFT_STAMP_PS:Q} ${DVIPS_FLAGS} -o $*-draft.ps $
-+BMK: ${ENV_PROG:Q} ${DVIPS_ENV} ${DVIPS:Q} -h ${DRAFT_STAMP_PS:Q}
${DVIPS_FLAGS} -o $*-draft.ps $
- BMK:.else
--BMK: ${DVIPS:Q} ${DVIPS_FLAGS} -o $@ $
-+BMK: ${ENV_PROG:Q} ${DVIPS_ENV} ${DVIPS:Q} ${DVIPS_FLAGS} -o $@ $
- GMK:else
--GMK: $(DVIPS) $(DVIPS_FLAGS) -o $@ $
-+GMK: $(ENV_PROG) $(DVIPS_ENV) $(DVIPS) $(DVIPS_FLAGS) -o $@ $
- BMK:.endif
- GMK:endif
-
Index: pkg/PLIST
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/print/latex-mk/pkg/PLIST,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.1
diff -u -u -r1.1.1.1 PLIST
--- pkg/PLIST 31 Jan 2007 22:38:03 - 1.1.1.1
+++ pkg/PLIST 27 Jun 2009 12:03:21 -
@@ -26,6 +26,8 @@
share/latex-mk/latex.subdir.mk
share/latex-mk/lgrind.gmk
share/latex-mk/lgrind.mk
+share/latex-mk/mpost.gmk
+share/latex-mk/mpost.mk
share/latex-mk/tgif.gmk
share/latex-mk/tgif.mk
share/latex-mk/xfig.gmk
Re: MAINTAINER-UPDATE: print/latex-mk
No version updates or new ports will be committed at this point
without truly exceptional circumstances. Then ports will lock, when
there will be no commits to ports at all. Then watch for an
announcement saying that ports is unlocked later on...
On 2009/06/27 14:06, Andreas Bihlmaier wrote:
Hello,
here is a trivial update to print/latex-mk.
If you have no regressions either please commit.
Regards,
ahb
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/print/latex-mk/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -u -r1.3 Makefile
--- Makefile 1 Oct 2007 11:42:30 - 1.3
+++ Makefile 27 Jun 2009 12:03:21 -
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
COMMENT= set of Makefile fragments to manage LaTeX documents
-DISTNAME=latex-mk-1.8
+DISTNAME=latex-mk-1.9.1
CATEGORIES= print
HOMEPAGE=http://latex-mk.sourceforge.net/
Index: distinfo
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/print/latex-mk/distinfo,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -u -r1.2 distinfo
--- distinfo 5 Apr 2007 16:20:19 - 1.2
+++ distinfo 27 Jun 2009 12:03:21 -
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-MD5 (latex-mk-1.8.tar.gz) = fqCaGoJz4/DwJsuU8U0iMQ==
-RMD160 (latex-mk-1.8.tar.gz) = OwHSDtKsSNgONvS0rfhCZb/TfZg=
-SHA1 (latex-mk-1.8.tar.gz) = QCJlzZ2KtY0ZQUaZDnD4yCmb5rk=
-SHA256 (latex-mk-1.8.tar.gz) = UZlSUI9QWdZ2qwZ0tFid1C+wIAReT/V01eoVmeJNNvU=
-SIZE (latex-mk-1.8.tar.gz) = 560753
+MD5 (latex-mk-1.9.1.tar.gz) = GKvojOVypSXAXSSaJ3ScwQ==
+RMD160 (latex-mk-1.9.1.tar.gz) = VjanpBJhAFq26fOFiQ0+FfmE430=
+SHA1 (latex-mk-1.9.1.tar.gz) = yOZ9EGPaVVe2wltVM3isKbc0chk=
+SHA256 (latex-mk-1.9.1.tar.gz) = pmzHAjxFYxo8MJkeTjlKILrFXlIoq9iGaQY882W39ao=
+SIZE (latex-mk-1.9.1.tar.gz) = 579556
Index: patches/patch-latex_mk_in_in
===
RCS file: patches/patch-latex_mk_in_in
diff -N patches/patch-latex_mk_in_in
--- patches/patch-latex_mk_in_in 31 Jan 2007 22:38:03 - 1.1.1.1
+++ /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -
@@ -1,58 +0,0 @@
-$OpenBSD: patch-latex_mk_in_in,v 1.1.1.1 2007/01/31 22:38:03 steven Exp $
-
-adds DVIPS_ENV functionality.
-
latex.mk.in.in.orig Tue Jan 30 21:38:37 2007
-+++ latex.mk.in.in Tue Jan 30 21:42:32 2007
-@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@
- # DVIPDFM_ENV = environment variables set when running the dvipdfm
executable
- # DVIPDFM_FLAGS= flags passed to the dvipdfm executable
- # DVIPS= the dvips executable
-+# DVIPS_ENV= environment variables set when running the dvips
executable
- # DVIPS_FLAGS = flags passed to the dvips executable
- # GZIP = gzip program
- # GV = a postscript previewer executable
-@@ -145,6 +146,7 @@ DVIPDFM_ENV?=
- DVIPDFM_FLAGS+=
- DVIPDFM_LANDSCAPE_FLAGS?= -l
- DVIPS?= @DVIPS@
-+DVIPS_ENV?=
- DVIPS_FLAGS+= -j0
- DVIPS_LANDSCAPE_FLAGS?= -t landscape
- ECHO?= @ECHO@
-@@ -473,7 +475,7 @@ BMK:DEFAULTVIEWPS_DRAFT?=viewps_${__tmp
- BMK:ALLVIEWPS_DRAFT+= viewps_${__tmp__}-draft
- BMK:${__tmp__}-draft.ps: ${__tmp__}.dvi ${DATED_DRAFT_PS}
- BMK:sed s;DATE;`date`;g ${DATED_DRAFT_PS:Q} ${DRAFT_STAMP_PS:Q}
--BMK:${DVIPS:Q} -h ${DRAFT_STAMP_PS:Q} ${DVIPS_FLAGS} -o $@
${__tmp__}.dvi
-+BMK:${ENV_PROG:Q} ${DVIPS_ENV} ${DVIPS:Q} -h ${DRAFT_STAMP_PS:Q}
${DVIPS_FLAGS} -o $@ ${__tmp__}.dvi
- BMK:.endfor
-
- GMK:define viewps_template
-@@ -489,7 +491,7 @@ GMK:DEFAULTVIEWPS_DRAFT?=viewps_$(1)-dr
- GMK:ALLVIEWPS_DRAFT+= viewps_$(1)-draft
- GMK:$(1)-draft.ps: $(1).dvi ${DATED_DRAFT_PS}
- GMK:sed s;DATE;`date`;g ${DATED_DRAFT_PS} ${DRAFT_STAMP_PS}
--GMK:$(DVIPS) -h ${DRAFT_STAMP_PS} $(DVIPS_FLAGS) -o $@ $(1).dvi
-+GMK:$(ENV_PROG) $(DVIPS_ENV) $(DVIPS) -h ${DRAFT_STAMP_PS}
$(DVIPS_FLAGS) -o $@ $(1).dvi
- GMK:endef
- GMK:$(foreach __tmp__,$(NAME),$(eval $(call viewps_template,$(__tmp__
-
-@@ -960,13 +962,13 @@ GMK:endif
- BMK:.if defined(__DRAFT)
- GMK:ifdef __DRAFT
- GMK:sed s;DATE;`date`;g ${DATED_DRAFT_PS} ${DRAFT_STAMP_PS}
--GMK $(DVIPS) -h ${DRAFT_STAMP_PS} $(DVIPS_FLAGS) -o $*-draft.ps $
-+GMK:$(ENV_PROG) $(DVIPS_ENV) $(DVIPS) -h ${DRAFT_STAMP_PS}
$(DVIPS_FLAGS) -o $*-draft.ps $
- BMK:sed s;DATE;`date`;g ${DATED_DRAFT_PS:Q} ${DRAFT_STAMP_PS:Q}
--BMK:${DVIPS:Q} -h ${DRAFT_STAMP_PS:Q} ${DVIPS_FLAGS} -o $*-draft.ps
$
-+BMK:${ENV_PROG:Q} ${DVIPS_ENV} ${DVIPS:Q} -h ${DRAFT_STAMP_PS:Q}
${DVIPS_FLAGS} -o $*-draft.ps $
- BMK:.else
--BMK:${DVIPS:Q} ${DVIPS_FLAGS} -o $@ $
-+BMK:${ENV_PROG:Q} ${DVIPS_ENV} ${DVIPS:Q} ${DVIPS_FLAGS} -o $@ $
- GMK:else
--GMK:$(DVIPS) $(DVIPS_FLAGS) -o $@ $
-+GMK:$(ENV_PROG) $(DVIPS_ENV) $(DVIPS) $(DVIPS_FLAGS) -o $@ $
- BMK:.endif
- GMK:endif
-
Index: pkg/PLIST
No te lo puedes perder
Genere ganancias con su sitio Web... contáctenos Cada vez son más las personas que se informan sobre empresas y sus servicios buscando directamente su página Web. Las páginas Web se convierten en su tarjeta de visita, en el primer impacto que reciba el posible cliente. Le ofrecemos la solución más completa en diseño de páginas web, asesoría en desarrollos y diseño web profesional. Diseñamos páginas interactivas para la Internet con creatividad, buen manejo de la estética, garantizando una imagen gráfica sólida, comunicativa y sobre todo, un diseño web de rápido acceso y fácil navegación. OFERTAS ESPECIALES: Tienda Virtual Compra/venta de casas Comunidades virtuales Su tienda en Línea por solo $8,000 Pesos Inicie su negocio en línea Desea tener un sitio como MySpace, Hi5 o de encuentro de parejas Ver más... Ver más... Ver más... Contáctenos: www.loquequierasya.com Tel. (01-314) 3343446 Si NO desea recibir más información, haga click aquí [IMAGE]
Re: texlive - context broken?
hmm, on Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 12:27:13AM +0200, Pau said that I have been using ConTeXt for a while but now I am running into a problem. texlive comes with an ancient ConTeXt. if you dont use anything else, but context, you are better off with the old teTeX and upgrading the components by hand. it's not hard at all. http://wiki.contextgarden.net/OpenBSD_installation i mean to update that page but couldnt get there yet. if everything goes nice, there will be a context minimal for openbsd in the near future... -f -- everyone has a photographic memory, some don't have film.
Re: texlive - context broken?
Hello, yes, I had seen the page but, since it's referred to OpenBSD 3.8--4.2, and I do not find teTex_base, I thought it was outdated. Will you update the page? That would be very nice. I am itching to stick to this laptop and forget about the linux one. thanks, Pau 2009/6/27 frantisek holop min...@obiit.org: hmm, on Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 12:27:13AM +0200, Pau said that I have been using ConTeXt for a while but now I am running into a problem. texlive comes with an ancient ConTeXt. if you dont use anything else, but context, you are better off with the old teTeX and upgrading the components by hand. it's not hard at all. http://wiki.contextgarden.net/OpenBSD_installation i mean to update that page but couldnt get there yet. if everything goes nice, there will be a context minimal for openbsd in the near future... -f -- everyone has a photographic memory, some don't have film. -- Let there be peace on earth. And let it begin with misc
Re: texlive - context broken?
Hai, On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 10:37:21PM +0200, Pau wrote: Hello, yes, I had seen the page but, since it's referred to OpenBSD 3.8--4.2, and I do not find teTex_base, I thought it was outdated. I am unlikely to have time to fix this and it seems hardly worth it considering TeX Live 2009 will be out soon, hopefully with a much newer version of ConTeXt. I may check this is true. Maybe you can use a local texmf in ~/texmf to install a newer context. This will require some changes to your texmf.cmf. Run `kpsewhich texmf.cnf` to find this file. You will need to double exclaim !! your TEXMFHOME and check it is in TEXMFS and TEXMF_DBS before the other standard trees (off the top of my head). Sthen, thanks for CC. -- Best Regards Edd Barrett (Freelance software developer / technical writer / open-source developer) http://students.dec.bmth.ac.uk/ebarrett
Re: opera 10 beta with unite
It would take a lot more than change of license for Opera to be available on CD. It has to be Open Source project. Where does it say that the packages on CD must only be open-source? I say so. Is that enough?
Re: opera 10 beta with unite
On Sat, 27 Jun 2009 18:14:51 -0400, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote: I say so. Is that enough? Yep. -- Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. -- C. S. Lewis
Re: opera 10 beta with unite
On Sat, 27 Jun 2009 07:00:48 -0400, frantisek holop min...@obiit.org wrote: opera is commercial software. there is no point in asking for a change of license or to go open source. I do not think it is unreasonable to ask and to let a company, which creates commercial software, to evaluate their licensing in order to make their products more attractive to consumers. I think that permitting distributions via packages and OpenBSD is not such a hard request, though there may be valid reasons for not allowing such. Asking them to go Open Source is another matter entirely. Sincerely, Aaron W. Hsu -- Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. -- C. S. Lewis
Re: opera 10 beta with unite
Hello Stuart, Thanks for your perspective. On Sat, 27 Jun 2009 05:39:51 -0400, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote: Asking them to change license while also asking to provide binaries for another OS is far too much in one go. Besides, adding a new OS is just a technical and support issue, changing license is a very pervasive legal issue, often involving contracts with other companies etc. Usually a much more difficult thing to get changed. You are probably right there, but on the other hand, someone suggested that perhaps getting Opera distributed by default with the Operating System would be enough motivation for them to make a port of it. I don't know. I think that both goals should be pursued, but I don't know how and in which order. I doubt that OpenBSD would replace Firefox with Opera on the CD-ROMs, but, hehe, I bet that would make Opera take notice. Maybe not? Sincerely, Aaron W. Hsu -- Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. -- C. S. Lewis
