Re: Alpine mail client. Fresh install of 6.8. "Mail" works but Alpine problems

2021-01-23 Thread Austin Hook



Stefan,

  A million thanks!  Local host works!   

Too simple -- too logical!  I would never have imagined that Alpine 
wouldn't have worked without that. 


Going to my mounted backup drive Look at how long I haven't needed to 
change one of the shell configuration files!  ...: 

- 
pwd /home/... 
cd oldq3/ ls -l .cshrc -rw--- 1 ... ...  2707 Sep 23 2002 .cshrc

--

Of course I regularly change certain minor features in pine/Alpine's 
.pinerc so last change was earlier this month.  I am sure I never changed 
the smpt-server configuration, however.  [not showing the .pinerc file 
date here since it changes often]

Extract from  old .pinerc -- smtp-server was always left blank up till now...
---

# List of SMTP servers for sending mail. If blank: Unix Pine uses sendmail.
smtp-server=

# NNTP server for posting news. Also sets news-collections for news reading.
nntp-server=


Now going into the newly installed Alpine mail client Setup/Configure menu
--
SMTP Server (for sending) =
  
NNTP Server (for news)=   
  

I NOTE THAT FIRST USE AFTER NEW INSTALL, if there is no  .pinerc file yet,
it immediately tries to send a message back to the maintainers at U.  of
Washington, and obviously expects that to work, but instead, it immediately
hangs.  That probably means that something in how OpenBSD is configured
these days, doesn't allow for that.  But maybe it should, or rather, a small
change in the patches for the Alpine port configuration, for OpenBSD, could
allow for it to immediately send from the box where Alpine was just newly
installed.

Looking directly into the new .pinerc file:

Extract follows:

# List of SMTP servers for sending mail. If blank: Unix Alpine uses sendmail.
smtp-server=

# NNTP server for posting news. Also sets news-collections for news reading.
nntp-server=

/Extract

i.e.  same as ever



Now after using the Setup/Configure menu in the latest version from 6.8
packages and setting the server to "localhost", as you suggested, the
.pinerc looks like:

Extract:
# List of SMTP servers for sending mail. If blank: Unix Alpine uses sendmail.
smtp-server=localhost

# NNTP server for posting news. Also sets news-collections for news reading.
nntp-server=

/Extract

AND THAT WORKS LIKE A CHARM!

What's really curious is the statement in .pinerc that "If blank: Unix 
Alpine uses sendmail." Well to me that implies that it would use sendmail 
on the local host, so one wouldn't think that one would also have to 
specify it in the setup menu for first use.  --- After one already had to 
deal with the initial "hang"!

I note that the sendmail we now have is the pseudo Sendmail provided by 
the newer smpt/smptd system.  I can't see that being the problem.  Maybe 
some patch to Alpine was made for tighter OpenBSD security, or there is 
some additional system configuration I should have attended to these days.

I'll put into my todo list to do a little more code digging, and look at 
the port if no one else gets to it.  At the moment I have an incredible 
backlog of work and apologies to make for lost incoming emails after being 
down for a week, and also not replying even after incoming email was 
working and I had the awkward work-around of "Mail".

I note that .calendar is not working for me.  Wonder if it is a related kind
of deeper problem in my system setup.   Not critical though 

Most Alpine users (if any are still left), probably use an external mail
server, and would have filled in something, so would never see this problem.

Still would like to hear from any regular OpenBSD Alpine users.

-

Now to set up a new webserver too.  And then maybe even do some crucial 
Year End company paperwork  [Wish I had some time left for 
programming!]

Stefan, again, thanks so much.   

Regards,

Austin Hook
Milk River, Canada




On Sat, 23 Jan 2021, Stefan Hagen wrote:

> Hi Austin,
> 
> aus...@computershop.ca wrote:
> > 2) Any reason why the new pseudo-Sendmail wouldn't handle Apline as
> > well as the old one did?
> 
> This mailing list is mostly for porting work and not for questions about
> functionality or bugs that are not related to the porting process but
> the software itself.
> 
> That being said, I played around with alpine. You're right. If you leave
> "smtp-server=" empty, sending an email gets stuck as you described.
> 
> I've tried to set "smtp-server=" to localhost as well as to my
> SMTP/SMTPs OpenSMTPd server. Those 

Re: Alpine mail client. Fresh install of 6.8. "Mail" works but Alpine problems

2021-01-23 Thread Stefan Hagen
Hi Austin,

aus...@computershop.ca wrote:
> 2) Any reason why the new pseudo-Sendmail wouldn't handle Apline as
> well as the old one did?

This mailing list is mostly for porting work and not for questions about
functionality or bugs that are not related to the porting process but
the software itself.

That being said, I played around with alpine. You're right. If you leave
"smtp-server=" empty, sending an email gets stuck as you described.

I've tried to set "smtp-server=" to localhost as well as to my
SMTP/SMTPs OpenSMTPd server. Those configurations are working fine and 
maybe you can use one of these?

Why it gets stuck when falling back to the sendmail binary, I don't 
know. Using the sendmail binary manually is working here.

The correct list to address this would be: https://opensmtpd.org/list.html

Best Regards,
Stefan



Re: alpine fails linking because of undefined reference to `RAND_egd'

2014-06-19 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2014/06/19 10:02, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
 
 On Wednesday, June 18, 2014 22:02 CEST, Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org 
 wrote:
 
  On 2014/06/18 21:54, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
  
   On Wednesday, June 18, 2014 20:23 CEST, Stuart Henderson 
   st...@openbsd.org wrote:
  
On 2014/06/18 18:54, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
 Hi,

 not sure if this is known already, but this happens to me on i386:
   
Check you don't have old libs around, especially make sure you've 
followed
the kerberos removal on current.html.
  
I did not upgrade, it happens on a fresh clean install.
 
 as it turned out, i have DEBUG= defined in my /etc/mk.conf, which is 
 triggering
 the build failure.
 
 attached patch allows building alpine with DEBUG in mk.conf.
 
 Don't know if this is the most clever way, but looking at how other ports
 handle RAND_egd they just removed it.
 Also I'm unsure which of the many SUBPACKAGE to bump REVISION ;)

It seems rather strange that setting DEBUG should trigger building code
that uses RAND_egd ..



Re: alpine fails linking because of undefined reference to `RAND_egd'

2014-06-19 Thread Sebastian Reitenbach
 
On Thursday, June 19, 2014 10:28 CEST, Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org 
wrote: 
 
 On 2014/06/19 10:02, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
  
  On Wednesday, June 18, 2014 22:02 CEST, Stuart Henderson 
  st...@openbsd.org wrote:
  
   On 2014/06/18 21:54, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
   
On Wednesday, June 18, 2014 20:23 CEST, Stuart Henderson 
st...@openbsd.org wrote:
   
 On 2014/06/18 18:54, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
  Hi,
 
  not sure if this is known already, but this happens to me on i386:

 Check you don't have old libs around, especially make sure you've 
 followed
 the kerberos removal on current.html.
   
 I did not upgrade, it happens on a fresh clean install.
  
  as it turned out, i have DEBUG= defined in my /etc/mk.conf, which is 
  triggering
  the build failure.
  
  attached patch allows building alpine with DEBUG in mk.conf.
  
  Don't know if this is the most clever way, but looking at how other ports
  handle RAND_egd they just removed it.
  Also I'm unsure which of the many SUBPACKAGE to bump REVISION ;)
 
 It seems rather strange that setting DEBUG should trigger building code
 that uses RAND_egd ..
 
it indeed is, but I haven't seen any obvious #ifdef around it. There are some
#ifdefs in that file, but nothing that immediately seems to relate to DEBUG

Sebastian



Re: alpine fails linking because of undefined reference to `RAND_egd'

2014-06-18 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2014/06/18 18:54, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
 Hi,
 
 not sure if this is known already, but this happens to me on i386:

Check you don't have old libs around, especially make sure you've followed
the kerberos removal on current.html.



Re: alpine fails linking because of undefined reference to `RAND_egd'

2014-06-18 Thread Sebastian Reitenbach
 
On Wednesday, June 18, 2014 20:23 CEST, Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org 
wrote: 
 
 On 2014/06/18 18:54, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
  Hi,
  
  not sure if this is known already, but this happens to me on i386:
 
 Check you don't have old libs around, especially make sure you've followed
 the kerberos removal on current.html.
 
 I did not upgrade, it happens on a fresh clean install.

cheers,
Sebastian
 
 




Re: re-alpine ports appears to be broken

2013-06-23 Thread Landry Breuil
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 09:07:47PM -0700, Scott Vanderbilt wrote:
 Thanks very much for that.
 
 I'm not sure what I could have done differently, though. I grabbed my
 packages and the snapshot all within an hour or two earlier today from the
 same mirror. So I don't think it was a terribly unreasonable assumption on
 my part that they were mutually compatible. Is there any way to know that
 the snapshot and packages are out-of-sync so I can avoid any problems like
 this in the future? I did notice that they were two days apart, but didn't
 know whether that ipso facto meant there was a problem.
 
 I read the FAQ on this topic (5.1) and it is understandably vague on this
 point, but is it possible to determine when the next snapshot will be
 released? If tomorrow, I will wait. If not, then I will just go ahead and
 re-build the system from source.

Look at krb5-config --libs gssapi output. If it shows heimntlm,
krb5-config is outdated and might causing the build failure. cvs up in
/usr/src/kerberosV/ and rebuild it from
/usr/src/kerberosV/usr.bin/krb5-config. I had a similar issue with
cyrus-sasl2 and that fixed it.

Landry



re-alpine ports appears to be broken

2013-06-22 Thread Scott Vanderbilt
Hello. I'm having trouble trying to build uw-imap on -current. There
appears to be no maintainer for this port, thus my post here.

I am running the latest available i386 snapshot:

 #sysctl -n kern.version
  OpenBSD 5.3-current (GENERIC.MP) #8: Thu Jun 20 09:51:38 MDT 2013
 t...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP

I tried to install the package which is contemporary with this snapshot,
but it is dated 17 June, and it fails to install. Here is the relevant
output:

 #sudo pkg_add imap-uw-2.03p3v0.tgz


 Can't install imap-uw-2.03p3v0 because of libraries
 |library heimntlm.0.0 not found
 | not found anywhere
 |library hx509.0.0 not found
 | not found anywhere
 Direct dependencies for imap-uw-2.03p3v0 resolve to libiconv-1.14p0
gettext-0.18.2p2
 Full dependency tree is libiconv-1.14p0 gettext-0.18.2p2
 #

Fair enough. So I try to build re-alpine from source. However, that fails
also. I am using the current ports tree, from ports.tar.gz file dated
22-Jun-2013
03:07

#cd /usr/ports/mail/re-alpine
#make
=== alpine-2.03p3 depends on: aspell-* - aspell-0.60.6.1p1
=== alpine-2.03p3 depends on: gettext-=0.10.38 - gettext-0.18.2p2
=== alpine-2.03p3 depends on: libtool-* - libtool-2.4.2
=== alpine-2.03p3 depends on: bzip2-* - bzip2-1.0.6p0
=== alpine-2.03p3 depends on: libiconv-* - libiconv-1.14p0
===  Verifying specs: asn1 c crypto gssapi krb5 ncurses ssl com_err
heimbase roken wind intl=5 iconv=6 asn1 c crypto gssapi krb5 ncurses ssl
com_err heimbase roken wind intl=5 iconv=6 com_err crypto pthread ssl
 asn1 c crypto gssapi krb5 ncurses ssl com_err heimbase roken wind intl=5
iconv=6 com_err crypto ssl asn1 c crypto gssapi krb5 ncurses ssl com_err
heimbase roken wind intl=5 iconv=6 com_err crypto ssl asn1 c crypto
gssapi krb5 ncurses ssl com_err heimbase roken wind intl=5 iconv=6
pthread asn1 c crypto gssapi krb5 ncurses ssl com_err heimbase roken wind
intl=5 iconv=6 pthread
===  found asn1.19.0 c.68.4 crypto.22.0 gssapi.6.0 krb5.19.0 ncurses.12.1
ssl.19.0 com_err.19.0 heimbase.0.0 roken.0.0 wind.0.0 intl.6.0 iconv.6.0
pthread.17.3
===  Checking files for re-alpine-2.03
`/usr/ports/distfiles/re-alpine-2.03.tar.bz2' is up to date.
 (SHA256) re-alpine-2.03.tar.bz2: OK
===  Extracting for re-alpine-2.03
===  Patching for re-alpine-2.03
===  Configuring for re-alpine-2.03
Using /usr/ports/pobj/re-alpine-2.03/config.site (generated)
configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --disable-silent-rules
configure: loading site script /usr/ports/pobj/re-alpine-2.03/config.site
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g bin
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... mkdir -p
checking for gawk... (cached) awk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... (cached) yes
checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no
checking build system type... i386-unknown-openbsd5.3
checking host system type... i386-unknown-openbsd5.3
configure: Configuring for alpine 2.03 (i386-unknown-openbsd5.3))
checking for gcc... cc
checking whether the C compiler works... no
configure: error: in `/usr/ports/pobj/re-alpine-2.03/re-alpine-2.03':
configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
See `config.log' for more details.
*** Error 77 in .
(/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2603'/usr/ports/pobj/re-alpine-2.03/.configure_done':
@for d in
/usr/ports/pobj...)
*** Error 1 in /usr/ports/mail/re-alpine (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/
bsd.port.mk:2368 'all')
re-alpine #

I'm not sure how to proceed. Any guidance would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you.


Re: re-alpine ports appears to be broken

2013-06-22 Thread Amit Kulkarni

  Can't install imap-uw-2.03p3v0 because of libraries
  |library heimntlm.0.0 not found
  | not found anywhere
  |library hx509.0.0 not found
  | not found anywhere
  Direct dependencies for imap-uw-2.03p3v0 resolve to libiconv-1.14p0
 gettext-0.18.2p2
  Full dependency tree is libiconv-1.14p0 gettext-0.18.2p2
  #



This shows that the package was compiled with old kerberos support.



 ===  Verifying specs: asn1 c crypto gssapi krb5 ncurses ssl com_err
 heimbase roken wind intl=5 iconv=6 asn1 c crypto gssapi krb5 ncurses ssl
 com_err heimbase roken wind intl=5 iconv=6 com_err crypto pthread ssl
  asn1 c crypto gssapi krb5 ncurses ssl com_err heimbase roken wind intl=5
 iconv=6 com_err crypto ssl asn1 c crypto gssapi krb5 ncurses ssl com_err
 heimbase roken wind intl=5 iconv=6 com_err crypto ssl asn1 c crypto
 gssapi krb5 ncurses ssl com_err heimbase roken wind intl=5 iconv=6
 pthread asn1 c crypto gssapi krb5 ncurses ssl com_err heimbase roken wind
 intl=5 iconv=6 pthread
 ===  found asn1.19.0 c.68.4 crypto.22.0 gssapi.6.0 krb5.19.0 ncurses.12.1
 ssl.19.0 com_err.19.0 heimbase.0.0 roken.0.0 wind.0.0 intl.6.0 iconv.6.0
 pthread.17.3


heimbase com_err etc... this shows that you are trying to use old userland
and mixing it with current ports. solution is to wait for newer snaps or
compile kernel/userland/xenocara and then try to compile the port yourself.


Re: re-alpine ports appears to be broken

2013-06-22 Thread Scott Vanderbilt
Thanks very much for that.

I'm not sure what I could have done differently, though. I grabbed my
packages and the snapshot all within an hour or two earlier today from the
same mirror. So I don't think it was a terribly unreasonable assumption on
my part that they were mutually compatible. Is there any way to know that
the snapshot and packages are out-of-sync so I can avoid any problems like
this in the future? I did notice that they were two days apart, but didn't
know whether that ipso facto meant there was a problem.

I read the FAQ on this topic (5.1) and it is understandably vague on this
point, but is it possible to determine when the next snapshot will be
released? If tomorrow, I will wait. If not, then I will just go ahead and
re-build the system from source.

Thank you again for your response.



On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Amit Kulkarni amitk...@gmail.com wrote:



  Can't install imap-uw-2.03p3v0 because of libraries
  |library heimntlm.0.0 not found
  | not found anywhere
  |library hx509.0.0 not found
  | not found anywhere
  Direct dependencies for imap-uw-2.03p3v0 resolve to libiconv-1.14p0
 gettext-0.18.2p2
  Full dependency tree is libiconv-1.14p0 gettext-0.18.2p2
  #



 This shows that the package was compiled with old kerberos support.



 ===  Verifying specs: asn1 c crypto gssapi krb5 ncurses ssl com_err
 heimbase roken wind intl=5 iconv=6 asn1 c crypto gssapi krb5 ncurses ssl
 com_err heimbase roken wind intl=5 iconv=6 com_err crypto pthread ssl
  asn1 c crypto gssapi krb5 ncurses ssl com_err heimbase roken wind intl=5
 iconv=6 com_err crypto ssl asn1 c crypto gssapi krb5 ncurses ssl com_err
 heimbase roken wind intl=5 iconv=6 com_err crypto ssl asn1 c crypto
 gssapi krb5 ncurses ssl com_err heimbase roken wind intl=5 iconv=6
 pthread asn1 c crypto gssapi krb5 ncurses ssl com_err heimbase roken wind
 intl=5 iconv=6 pthread
 ===  found asn1.19.0 c.68.4 crypto.22.0 gssapi.6.0 krb5.19.0 ncurses.12.1
 ssl.19.0 com_err.19.0 heimbase.0.0 roken.0.0 wind.0.0 intl.6.0 iconv.6.0
 pthread.17.3


 heimbase com_err etc... this shows that you are trying to use old userland
 and mixing it with current ports. solution is to wait for newer snaps or
 compile kernel/userland/xenocara and then try to compile the port yourself.



[new] re-alpine

2012-09-23 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
Hi.

This is a port of re-alpine that will supersed mail/alpine and mail/imap-uw.
re-alpine is the continuation of the Alpine email client from University of 
Washington which development have been stopped.

This port provides the following packages:
alpine
c-client
imap-uw
mailutil-uw
pico
pilot

I'd appreciate tests and comments.
Thanks.

-- 
Antoine


re-alpine.tgz
Description: application/tar-gz


Re: alpine

2012-03-05 Thread Marc Espie
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 02:06:05PM -0800, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
 has anyone else noticed that alpine is very incompatible with rthreads?

Nope. Nobody uses alpine.

 i sent diagnostics to guenther that were so bad, he didn't even reply.


More seriously, when ? guenther has been fixing a huge amount of things
concerning threads lately, some are still in transit.

So, hey, first try again with a really current system.

Then, try to figure out what's wrong. Simple test cases do help. Alpine is
not a simple testcase.

Also, how come guenther gets diagnostics and we don't ? I have no idea
what your bug report looked like. Maybe he didn't reply because he had
better bug reports to look at ?



Re: alpine

2012-03-05 Thread Chris Cappuccio
Marc Espie [es...@nerim.net] wrote:
 On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 02:06:05PM -0800, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
  has anyone else noticed that alpine is very incompatible with rthreads?
 
 Nope. Nobody uses alpine.
 

I don't either, but some other folks do.

  i sent diagnostics to guenther that were so bad, he didn't even reply.
 
 
 More seriously, when ? guenther has been fixing a huge amount of things
 concerning threads lately, some are still in transit.
 

I know. He is very thorough. And he usually replies very fast but the pathetic 
nature of my bug reports shut people down.

 So, hey, first try again with a really current system.
 

Feb 27th kernel and library. I don't think anything significant has gone in 
since that time.

 Then, try to figure out what's wrong. Simple test cases do help. Alpine is
 not a simple testcase.
 
 Also, how come guenther gets diagnostics and we don't ? I have no idea
 what your bug report looked like. Maybe he didn't reply because he had
 better bug reports to look at ?

Probably. Here's what I sent to him. 

Alpine alternates between crashing with sig11 when trying to send mail via 
SMTP, or failing to send mail through SMTP with a bogus SMTP error message (but 
not crashing).

Sending e-mail always bails after the MAIL FROM in the SMTP session with a 
bogus 421 SMTP server error message (that the SMTP server didn't send)

 13988 alpine   GIO   fd 8 wrote 34 bytes
   MAIL FROM:ch...@ref.nmedia.net\r
   
 13988 alpine   RET   write 34/0x22
 13988 alpine   CALL  read(0x9,0x204e2f000,0x1000)
 13988 alpine   RET   read 0
 13988 alpine   CALL  close(0x9)
 13988 alpine   PSIG  SIGCHLD caught handler=0x4ba0a0 mask=0x0
 13988 alpine   RET   close 0
 13988 alpine   CALL  sigreturn(0x7f7c4ab0)
 13988 alpine   RET   sigreturn JUSTRETURN
 13988 alpine   CALL  close(0x8)
 13988 alpine   RET   close 0
 13988 alpine   CALL  wait4(0x6401,0x7f7c4e1c,0invalid0,0)
 13988 alpine   RET   wait4 25601/0x6401
 13988 alpine   CALL  sigaction(SIGINT,0x7f7c4e30,0x7f7c4e20)
 13988 alpine   RET   sigaction 0
 13988 alpine   CALL  sigaction(SIGHUP,0x7f7c4e30,0x7f7c4e20)
 13988 alpine   RET   sigaction 0
 13988 alpine   CALL  sigaction(SIGQUIT,0x7f7c4e30,0x7f7c4e20)
 13988 alpine   RET   sigaction 0
 13988 alpine   CALL  gettimeofday(0x7f7c91b0,0x7f7c91c0)
 13988 alpine   RET   gettimeofday 0
 13988 alpine   CALL  gettimeofday(0x7f7c91a0,0x7f7c91b0)
 13988 alpine   RET   gettimeofday 0
 13988 alpine   CALL  gettimeofday(0x7f7c9190,0x7f7c91a0)
 13988 alpine   RET   gettimeofday 0
 13988 alpine   CALL  kill(0xfb132,SIGTHR)
 13988 alpine   RET   kill 0
 28402 alpine   PSIG  SIGTHR caught handler=0x20cbd6de0 mask=0x808
 28402 alpine   RET   nanosleep -1 errno 4 Interrupted system call

Here's what happens when you try to send mail and alpine crashes:

 13988 alpine   GIO   fd 1 wrote 81 bytes
   \^[[23;1H\^[[K\^[[24;1H\^[[K\^[[22;1H\^[[K\^[[7m\^[[22;27H[Sending mail 
|  |]\^[[27m\^[[22;1H
 13988 alpine   RET   write 81/0x51
 13988 alpine   CALL  munmap(0x206518000,0x12000)
 13988 alpine   RET   munmap 0
 13988 alpine   CALL  
mmap(0,0x12000,0x3PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,0x1000MAP_ANON,0x,0)
 13988 alpine   RET   mmap 8710569984/0x20730c000
 13988 alpine   CALL  mprotect(0x20730c000,0x1000,0PROT_NONE)
 13988 alpine   RET   mprotect 0
 13988 alpine   CALL  __tfork(0x7f7c8e80)
 13988 alpine   RET   __tfork 1007295/0xf5ebf
 13988 alpine   CALL  gettimeofday(0x7f7c8d40,0x7f7c8d50)
 13988 alpine   RET   gettimeofday 0
  7295 alpine   RET   rfork 0
 13988 alpine   CALL  gettimeofday(0x7f7c91b0,0x7f7c91c0)
  7295 alpine   CALL  sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK,0x808)
  7295 alpine   RET   sigprocmask 0
 13988 alpine   RET   gettimeofday 0
  7295 alpine   CALL  nanosleep(0x20731dfb0,0)
 13988 alpine   CALL  access(0x20c079f40,0x1X_OK)
 13988 alpine   NAMI  /usr/sbin/sendmail
 13988 alpine   RET   access 0
 13988 alpine   CALL  pipe(0x7f7c81c0)
 13988 alpine   RET   pipe 0
 13988 alpine   CALL  pipe(0x7f7c81c0)
 13988 alpine   RET   pipe 0
 13988 alpine   CALL  vfork()
 26036 alpine   PSIG  SIGTHR caught handler=0x20cbd6de0 mask=0x0
 26036 alpine   RET   rfork 0
 26036 alpine   CALL  sigreturn(0x7f7c7f50)
 26036 alpine   RET   sigreturn JUSTRETURN
 26036 alpine   CALL  sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK,0x808)
 26036 alpine   RET   sigprocmask 0
 26036 alpine   CALL  sched_yield()
 26036 alpine   RET   sched_yield 0
 26036 alpine   CALL  sched_yield()
 26036 alpine   RET   sched_yield 0
 26036 alpine   CALL  sched_yield()
 26036 alpine   RET   sched_yield 0
 26036 alpine   CALL  sched_yield()
 26036 alpine   RET   sched_yield 0
 26036 alpine   CALL  sched_yield()
 26036 alpine   RET   sched_yield 0
 26036 alpine   CALL  sched_yield()
 26036 alpine   RET   sched_yield 0
 26036 alpine   CALL  sched_yield()
 26036 alpine   RET   sched_yield 0
 26036 alpine   CALL  sched_yield()
 26036 alpine   RET   sched_yield 0
 26036 

Re: alpine check Do Not Send Flowed Text by default

2010-08-31 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2010/08/31 11:08, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
 Hi.
 
 Following a chat with Daniel Dickman and after several questions in the 
 past about how to send inline patches with alpine I'd like to enable the 
 Do Not Send Flowed Text option by default.

cool!!!

 Any ojections?

none from me (I don't use alpine but this is total win for the mailing
lists!).



Re: alpine check Do Not Send Flowed Text by default

2010-08-31 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2010/08/31 10:54, Stuart Henderson wrote:
 On 2010/08/31 11:08, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
  Hi.
  
  Following a chat with Daniel Dickman and after several questions in the 
  past about how to send inline patches with alpine I'd like to enable the 
  Do Not Send Flowed Text option by default.
 
 cool!!!
 
  Any ojections?
 
 none from me (I don't use alpine but this is total win for the mailing
 lists!).
 

...and then we need to do the same for thunderbird :-)



Re: alpine check Do Not Send Flowed Text by default

2010-08-31 Thread Landry Breuil
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:08:50AM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
 Hi.
 
 Following a chat with Daniel Dickman and after several questions in the 
 past about how to send inline patches with alpine I'd like to enable the 
 Do Not Send Flowed Text option by default.
 Any ojections?

I don't have an opinion on the option itself, but setting REVISION
without removing pX from PKGNAME-xxx looks wrong :)

Landry

 Index: Makefile
 ===
 RCS file: /cvs/ports/mail/alpine/Makefile,v
 retrieving revision 1.11
 diff -u -r1.11 Makefile
 --- Makefile  8 Nov 2009 08:22:53 -   1.11
 +++ Makefile  31 Aug 2010 08:38:39 -
 @@ -18,6 +18,10 @@
  PKGNAME-pico=pico-${PICO_V}p1
  PKGNAME-pilot=   pilot-${PILOT_V}p3
  
 +REVISION-main=   1
 +REVISION-pico=   1
 +REVISION-pilot=  3



Re: alpine not installing

2009-11-29 Thread Jacob Meuser
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 11:00:07AM +0100, Sebastian Anding wrote:
 Hi Listmembers,
 
 i tried to install mail/alpine. But make install does not do anything.

is it already installed?

-- 
jake...@sdf.lonestar.org
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org



Re: alpine-1.00 core dump in autocompleting file name for msg export

2008-05-20 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Mon, 19 May 2008, Jonathan Thornburg wrote:
 A gdb stack-trace of the latest core-dump (trying to export a message
 to the pathname   msg/misc/nanaimo.people  with Tab typed after the i
 shows this:
 (gdb) bt
 #0  0x0c2fe28d in kill () from /usr/lib/libc.so.43.0
 #1  0x0c3206d4 in __stack_smash_handler (func=0x3c020e9e pico_fncomplete, 
 damaged=233308416) at /usr/src/lib/libc/sys/stack_protector.c:89

Hmm stack overflow!
I'll have a look as soon as I get a bit more time...

Thanks for the report.

-- 
Antoine