RE: the sidemen thread

1999-04-14 Thread Matt Benz

FOlks counting the Jayhawks, or even the Hawks as sidemen are kinda
missing the albeit very fine point. They're backing bands, more than
they are sidemen, who are folks like Jon W. mentioned, and Glen
Campbell, Leon Russell, Hal Blaine, etc.. folks hired to fill out the
sound of a recording session, not friends of the artist who are part of
a particular scene, like the Jayhawks. They may put their own particular
styles and sound into the recording, and are usually hailed for that by
anal musicians on down the line, who can tell every Burton lick and
Blaine roll g. They were hired because they were the whip, the trusted
for hire musicians who can nail the recording and nail it well in a
short amount of time. The Jayhawks probably didn't draw pay from the Joe
Henry session, at least not union scale like a true side musician. Maybe
they were paid in beer, or good vibes, I don't know, but they didn't
walk into the session, hear one pass of the tune and then come up with a
part, I would bet. Not that they could'nt, but I'd wager that a Joe
Henry session with the Jayhawks was a far different scene than Emmons
and Ray Price

Matt "hit me with your best shot" Benz 



RE: the sidemen thread, singles, ect...

1999-04-14 Thread Matt Benz

I confess to not being able to follow the thread much, so never mind if
I'm off base. Just pickin those nits.

As for singles, there is a pretty good book (by David Marsh?) of best
singles (rock and pop) and it is a -of course completely subjective
listing of great singles and why. A good read, inspires you to go back
and listen to say "Ticket To Ride" again...

Singles generally conjure up time and place, particulary summer singles,
so of course to pick the best means to pull together not just perfect
musical moments, but personal moments as well and combine em for a swell
experience. "It's So Nice To Be With You" qualifies for me, tho the song
ain't so hot. I still can't hear it without hearing the crackling sounds
of the 45 we had. But you're all talking punk and new wave singles,
ain't ya?  Lords of the New Church: Open Your Eyes, 1983.

 -Original Message-
 From: Morgan Keating [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 1999 1:43 PM
 To:   passenger side
 Subject:      RE:  the sidemen thread
 
 
 Well, I suppose...but I think the general rule to the voting process
 was
 that there really weren't any?  True, a band doesn't fit the
 desription of
 "sidemen", but what the hey?  A nod to the godesses...what about
 sidewomen?
  Not sure where you're going with the whole pay issue?  But, I guess
 it'll
 be something for the powers that be to decide.  g  Either way, 'tis
 not a
 big deal, just me 2 cents...
 
 morgan
 
 
 
 At 01:08 PM 4/14/99 -0400, you wrote:
 FOlks counting the Jayhawks, or even the Hawks as sidemen are kinda
 missing the albeit very fine point. They're backing bands, more than
 they are sidemen, who are folks like Jon W. mentioned, and Glen
 Campbell, Leon Russell, Hal Blaine, etc.. folks hired to fill out the
 sound of a recording session, not friends of the artist who are part
 of
 a particular scene, like the Jayhawks. They may put their own
 particular
 styles and sound into the recording, and are usually hailed for that
 by
 anal musicians on down the line, who can tell every Burton lick and
 Blaine roll g. They were hired because they were the whip, the
 trusted
 for hire musicians who can nail the recording and nail it well in a
 short amount of time. The Jayhawks probably didn't draw pay from the
 Joe
 Henry session, at least not union scale like a true side musician.
 Maybe
 they were paid in beer, or good vibes, I don't know, but they didn't
 walk into the session, hear one pass of the tune and then come up
 with a
 part, I would bet. Not that they could'nt, but I'd wager that a Joe
 Henry session with the Jayhawks was a far different scene than Emmons
 and Ray Price
 
 Matt "hit me with your best shot" Benz 
 



RE: the sidemen thread, singles, ect...

1999-04-14 Thread Morgan Keating

At 03:36 PM 4/14/99 -0400, you wrote:
I confess to not being able to follow the thread much, so never mind if
I'm off base. Just pickin those nits.

Ah, not a problem...

As for singles, there is a pretty good book (by David Marsh?) of best
singles (rock and pop) and it is a -of course completely subjective
listing of great singles and why. A good read, inspires you to go back
and listen to say "Ticket To Ride" again...

That sounds like a good one...  I like Marsh to boot for the most part...
'Ceptin maybe for "Glory Days"...  He was officially on the Springsteen
payroll aside from the book commision, yes?  No slam on Bruce though...love
him.

Singles generally conjure up time and place, particulary summer singles,
so of course to pick the best means to pull together not just perfect
musical moments, but personal moments as well and combine em for a swell
experience. "It's So Nice To Be With You" qualifies for me, tho the song
ain't so hot. I still can't hear it without hearing the crackling sounds
of the 45 we had. But you're all talking punk and new wave singles,
ain't ya?  Lords of the New Church: Open Your Eyes, 1983.

No, you're right on the money on that one...  Please don't kill me folks,
but going with what you were saying Matt, I vividly recall hearing
"Stone(d) in Love" by Journey one particular summer.  Great summer and I
guess I just associate it in a "Wonder Years" type reverie...  I remember
destroying my Apple 45 of "Hey Jude" backed by "Revolution" (if I recall)
from far too many plays...  Another song I associate with summer...or Steve
Earle's "I Feel Alright", it was all over a Boston station at the time and
I picked up the record the night before my wife delivered...The song just
brings me back... 

New wave single:  Talk Talk-It's My Life

morgan

 -Original Message-
 From:Morgan Keating [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent:    Wednesday, April 14, 1999 1:43 PM
 To:  passenger side
 Subject: RE:  the sidemen thread
 
 
 Well, I suppose...but I think the general rule to the voting process
 was
 that there really weren't any?  True, a band doesn't fit the
 desription of
 "sidemen", but what the hey?  A nod to the godesses...what about
 sidewomen?
  Not sure where you're going with the whole pay issue?  But, I guess
 it'll
 be something for the powers that be to decide.  g  Either way, 'tis
 not a
 big deal, just me 2 cents...
 
 morgan
 
 
 
 At 01:08 PM 4/14/99 -0400, you wrote:
 FOlks counting the Jayhawks, or even the Hawks as sidemen are kinda
 missing the albeit very fine point. They're backing bands, more than
 they are sidemen, who are folks like Jon W. mentioned, and Glen
 Campbell, Leon Russell, Hal Blaine, etc.. folks hired to fill out the
 sound of a recording session, not friends of the artist who are part
 of
 a particular scene, like the Jayhawks. They may put their own
 particular
 styles and sound into the recording, and are usually hailed for that
 by
 anal musicians on down the line, who can tell every Burton lick and
 Blaine roll g. They were hired because they were the whip, the
 trusted
 for hire musicians who can nail the recording and nail it well in a
 short amount of time. The Jayhawks probably didn't draw pay from the
 Joe
 Henry session, at least not union scale like a true side musician.
 Maybe
 they were paid in beer, or good vibes, I don't know, but they didn't
 walk into the session, hear one pass of the tune and then come up
 with a
 part, I would bet. Not that they could'nt, but I'd wager that a Joe
 Henry session with the Jayhawks was a far different scene than Emmons
 and Ray Price
 
 Matt "hit me with your best shot" Benz