Re: Postfix stable release 2.9.0
orib...@gmail.com (Ori Bani) writes: On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: [An on-line version of this announcement will be available at http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-2.9.0.html] Postfix stable release 2.9.0 is available. The main changes in no particular order are: Does anyone know how soon Simon Mudd usually responds to releases like this? Not trying to hurry anyone, *just* asking. Hi. Best I answer I guess. As most of you probably realise I'm not following postfix much now. Work and family means I have a lot less time to do that, but also I started working on the rpms when there were none. Now that situation is quite different. So I've been poked that 2.9 is out (thanks) and I will have a look over the next few days to see if I can build a 2.9 version of my rpms. I've also updated the 2.8 version to 2.8.8, as they were a bit behind. If others think that I should update the other older versions please let me know. So if people still have an interest in my rpms and find them out of date, missing functionality etc, pleas poke me offlist directly and I'll respond as and if I can. It's great to see that postfix development is still ongoing and if the work I've been doing is still useful for some then I'll try and keep up to date. Simon Also look at: https://github.com/sjmudd/postfix-rpm where the source of the rpm build scripts I use is kept.
Re: Postfix stable release 2.9.0
On 2/2/2012 12:01 πμ, Reindl Harald wrote: rebuild postfix usually is a work of 5 minutes was there and distributed 2.8.8 two hours ago to 20 machines via RPM Hi, Where can we find a 2.8.x .src.rpm with *standard* Centos 5 postfix features (ldap, sasl, tls etc.) Thanks, Nick
Re: Postfix stable release 2.9.0
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 09:00:56PM -0800, Ori Bani wrote: On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Simon Brereton simon.brere...@buongiorno.com wrote: The OP has decided - and he has that right - that only Mudd's rpm's will do. Yes, as they've built a reputation for being quite reliable and well done. Agreed, Simon does a good job with his SRPMs. But also agreed with other posters: it is not difficult to edit Simon's spec file and roll your own. I'm sure that is what he does with most new releases. -- http://rob0.nodns4.us/ -- system administration and consulting Offlist GMX mail is seen only if /dev/rob0 is in the Subject:
Re: Postfix stable release 2.9.0
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: [An on-line version of this announcement will be available at http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-2.9.0.html] Postfix stable release 2.9.0 is available. The main changes in no particular order are: Does anyone know how soon Simon Mudd usually responds to releases like this? Not trying to hurry anyone, *just* asking.
Re: Postfix stable release 2.9.0
Am 01.02.2012 22:56, schrieb Ori Bani: On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: [An on-line version of this announcement will be available at http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-2.9.0.html] Postfix stable release 2.9.0 is available. The main changes in no particular order are: Does anyone know how soon Simon Mudd usually responds to releases like this? Not trying to hurry anyone, *just* asking who is Simon Mudd? rebuild postfix usually is a work of 5 minutes was there and distributed 2.8.8 two hours ago to 20 machines via RPM signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Postfix stable release 2.9.0
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 01.02.2012 22:56, schrieb Ori Bani: On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: [An on-line version of this announcement will be available at http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-2.9.0.html] Postfix stable release 2.9.0 is available. The main changes in no particular order are: Does anyone know how soon Simon Mudd usually responds to releases like this? Not trying to hurry anyone, *just* asking who is Simon Mudd? rebuild postfix usually is a work of 5 minutes was there and distributed 2.8.8 two hours ago to 20 machines via RPM No need to respond if you don't know the answer to the question. Many people here know who Simon is. See http://postfix.wl0.org/
Re: Postfix stable release 2.9.0
Le mercredi 01 février 2012 à 23:01 +0100, Reindl Harald a écrit : Am 01.02.2012 22:56, schrieb Ori Bani: On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: [An on-line version of this announcement will be available at http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-2.9.0.html] Postfix stable release 2.9.0 is available. The main changes in no particular order are: Does anyone know how soon Simon Mudd usually responds to releases like this? Not trying to hurry anyone, *just* asking who is Simon Mudd? rebuild postfix usually is a work of 5 minutes was there and distributed 2.8.8 two hours ago to 20 machines via RPM -- http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xC2626742 gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key C2626742 http://urlshort.eu fakessh @ http://gplus.to/sshfake http://gplus.to/sshswilting http://gplus.to/john.swilting https://lists.fakessh.eu/mailman/ This list is moderated by me, but all applications will be accepted provided they receive a note of presentation signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
Re: Postfix stable release 2.9.0
Le jeudi 02 février 2012 à 03:13 +0100, ml a écrit : Le mercredi 01 février 2012 à 23:01 +0100, Reindl Harald a écrit : Am 01.02.2012 22:56, schrieb Ori Bani: On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: [An on-line version of this announcement will be available at http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-2.9.0.html] Postfix stable release 2.9.0 is available. The main changes in no particular order are: Does anyone know how soon Simon Mudd usually responds to releases like this? Not trying to hurry anyone, *just* asking who is Simon Mudd? rebuild postfix usually is a work of 5 minutes was there and distributed 2.8.8 two hours ago to 20 machines via RPM i build with succes a rpm for postfix 2.9.0 for centos 5 for fine for me The main work was done not just SJ Mudd i have adapts required. I still have problems with the patch VDA standard is not to be applied correctly error that prevents the construction of the rpm still rpm source is disponible here http://ns.fakessh.eu/rpms/postfix-2.9.0-1.pcre.pgsql.mysql.sasl2.dovecot.sqlite.rhel5.src.rpm thanks -- http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xC2626742 gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key C2626742 http://urlshort.eu fakessh @ http://gplus.to/sshfake http://gplus.to/sshswilting http://gplus.to/john.swilting https://lists.fakessh.eu/mailman/ This list is moderated by me, but all applications will be accepted provided they receive a note of presentation signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
Re: Postfix stable release 2.9.0
2012/2/1 ml m...@smtp.fakessh.eu: Le jeudi 02 février 2012 à 03:13 +0100, ml a écrit : Le mercredi 01 février 2012 à 23:01 +0100, Reindl Harald a écrit : Am 01.02.2012 22:56, schrieb Ori Bani: On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: [An on-line version of this announcement will be available at http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-2.9.0.html] Postfix stable release 2.9.0 is available. The main changes in no particular order are: Does anyone know how soon Simon Mudd usually responds to releases like this? Not trying to hurry anyone, *just* asking who is Simon Mudd? rebuild postfix usually is a work of 5 minutes was there and distributed 2.8.8 two hours ago to 20 machines via RPM i build with succes a rpm for postfix 2.9.0 for centos 5 for fine for me The main work was done not just SJ Mudd i have adapts required. I still have problems with the patch VDA standard is not to be applied correctly error that prevents the construction of the rpm still rpm source is disponible here http://ns.fakessh.eu/rpms/postfix-2.9.0-1.pcre.pgsql.mysql.sasl2.dovecot.sqlite.rhel5.src.rpm Yah, I'll stick with Simon, who I think can write a sentence that I can read - even if his package will take longer. Something about the trust factor perhaps.
Re: Postfix stable release 2.9.0
Le mercredi 01 février 2012 à 19:30 -0800, Ori Bani a écrit : 2012/2/1 ml m...@smtp.fakessh.eu: Le jeudi 02 février 2012 à 03:13 +0100, ml a écrit : Le mercredi 01 février 2012 à 23:01 +0100, Reindl Harald a écrit : Am 01.02.2012 22:56, schrieb Ori Bani: On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: [An on-line version of this announcement will be available at http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-2.9.0.html] Postfix stable release 2.9.0 is available. The main changes in no particular order are: Does anyone know how soon Simon Mudd usually responds to releases like this? Not trying to hurry anyone, *just* asking who is Simon Mudd? rebuild postfix usually is a work of 5 minutes was there and distributed 2.8.8 two hours ago to 20 machines via RPM i build with succes a rpm for postfix 2.9.0 for centos 5 for fine for me The main work was done not just SJ Mudd i have adapts required. I still have problems with the patch VDA standard is not to be applied correctly error that prevents the construction of the rpm still rpm source is disponible here http://ns.fakessh.eu/rpms/postfix-2.9.0-1.pcre.pgsql.mysql.sasl2.dovecot.sqlite.rhel5.src.rpm Yah, I'll stick with Simon, who I think can write a sentence that I can read - even if his package will take longer. Something about the trust factor perhaps. I assure you that my work is correct and that my rpm is ok -- http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xC2626742 gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key C2626742 http://urlshort.eu fakessh @ http://gplus.to/sshfake http://gplus.to/sshswilting http://gplus.to/john.swilting https://lists.fakessh.eu/mailman/ This list is moderated by me, but all applications will be accepted provided they receive a note of presentation signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
Re: Postfix stable release 2.9.0
On Feb 1, 2012 11:20 PM, ml m...@smtp.fakessh.eu wrote: Le mercredi 01 février 2012 à 19:30 -0800, Ori Bani a écrit : 2012/2/1 ml m...@smtp.fakessh.eu: Le jeudi 02 février 2012 à 03:13 +0100, ml a écrit : Le mercredi 01 février 2012 à 23:01 +0100, Reindl Harald a écrit : Am 01.02.2012 22:56, schrieb Ori Bani: On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: [An on-line version of this announcement will be available at http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-2.9.0.html] Postfix stable release 2.9.0 is available. The main changes in no particular order are: Does anyone know how soon Simon Mudd usually responds to releases like this? Not trying to hurry anyone, *just* asking who is Simon Mudd? rebuild postfix usually is a work of 5 minutes was there and distributed 2.8.8 two hours ago to 20 machines via RPM i build with succes a rpm for postfix 2.9.0 for centos 5 for fine for me The main work was done not just SJ Mudd i have adapts required. I still have problems with the patch VDA standard is not to be applied correctly error that prevents the construction of the rpm still rpm source is disponible here http://ns.fakessh.eu/rpms/postfix-2.9.0-1.pcre.pgsql.mysql.sasl2.dovecot.sqlite.rhel5.src.rpm Yah, I'll stick with Simon, who I think can write a sentence that I can read - even if his package will take longer. Something about the trust factor perhaps. I assure you that my work is correct and that my rpm is ok Sadly you weren't being judged on your work but on the quality of your second, or third, language.. The OP has decided - and he has that right - that only Mudd's rpm's will do. I'm sure other people will thank you tho. Simon
Re: Postfix stable release 2.9.0
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Simon Brereton simon.brere...@buongiorno.com wrote: On Feb 1, 2012 11:20 PM, ml m...@smtp.fakessh.eu wrote: Le mercredi 01 février 2012 à 19:30 -0800, Ori Bani a écrit : 2012/2/1 ml m...@smtp.fakessh.eu: Le jeudi 02 février 2012 à 03:13 +0100, ml a écrit : Le mercredi 01 février 2012 à 23:01 +0100, Reindl Harald a écrit : Am 01.02.2012 22:56, schrieb Ori Bani: On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: [An on-line version of this announcement will be available at http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-2.9.0.html] Postfix stable release 2.9.0 is available. The main changes in no particular order are: Does anyone know how soon Simon Mudd usually responds to releases like this? Not trying to hurry anyone, *just* asking who is Simon Mudd? rebuild postfix usually is a work of 5 minutes was there and distributed 2.8.8 two hours ago to 20 machines via RPM i build with succes a rpm for postfix 2.9.0 for centos 5 for fine for me The main work was done not just SJ Mudd i have adapts required. I still have problems with the patch VDA standard is not to be applied correctly error that prevents the construction of the rpm still rpm source is disponible here http://ns.fakessh.eu/rpms/postfix-2.9.0-1.pcre.pgsql.mysql.sasl2.dovecot.sqlite.rhel5.src.rpm Yah, I'll stick with Simon, who I think can write a sentence that I can read - even if his package will take longer. Something about the trust factor perhaps. I assure you that my work is correct and that my rpm is ok Sadly you weren't being judged on your work but on the quality of your second, or third, language.. Having thought about it, I agree with you, I was a bit harsh given the language barrier. It's not fair to smart people who may not speak English so well, but when you see an email from someone new that is really hard to understand and not written in even simple sentences and without spell check, well, you do have to make *some* judgments. Anyway, sorry to ml (another reason to be iffy). The OP has decided - and he has that right - that only Mudd's rpm's will do. Yes, as they've built a reputation for being quite reliable and well done.
