Re: [OT] GWB: Al-Qaeda Fund Raiser

[Michael Madigan]

The irony is lost on them.
  
> On the other hand the same people clammering for us
> to leave Iraq are 
> wanting to go into Darfur and save the civilians.
> The crybabies can't have 
> it both ways.
> 

Anti-Illegal Alien Gear!
http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/2064119


Thoroughbred Horse Racing Group
http://sports.groups.yahoo.com/group/mikes_horse_racing/


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] GWB: Al-Qaeda Fund Raiser

[Nicholas Geti]

- Original Message - 
From: "Ricardo Aráoz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ProFox Email List" 
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 7:03 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] GWB: Al-Qaeda Fund Raiser


>Isn't it easier to get the fucking G.I.'s out of where they are not
>welcome? It's the other end of the world from you! Absolutely no reason
>for you to be there! (well, at least no GOOD or HONORABLE reason).

Who says we're not welcome. Our own liberal reporters interview lots of 
Iraquis who say they don't want us there but at the same recognize that if 
we leave there will be even worse civil war. In any case, I think maybe we 
should pull out and let the Iraquis reduce their population by themselves. 
Then if the Iranians or Syrians come in we can nuke them too.

On the other hand the same people clammering for us to leave Iraq are 
wanting to go into Darfur and save the civilians. The crybabies can't have 
it both ways.





___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [NF] Cities struggle with wireless Internet

[Virgil Bierschwale]

Obviously you've never been to the country..

Armadillos are disappearing.
Horny toads are disappearing.

Fire ants are appearing..

Virgil Bierschwale
http://www.bierschwale.com
http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Chet Gardiner
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 9:04 PM
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] Cities struggle with wireless Internet

Dingoes Eat Their Babies...:-)

Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
> Fireants...
> They eat their babies...
>
>
> Virgil Bierschwale
> http://www.bierschwale.com
> http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Chet Gardiner
> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 8:27 PM
> To: profox@leafe.com
> Subject: Re: [NF] Cities struggle with wireless Internet
>
> No one is saying it "kills bees". 
>
> The hypothesis is that all of the stray RF MAY be throwing off their 
> amazing navigation systems.  They find flowers and get tell their 
> fellows where they found them...
>
> It's not proved but it's surely possible...
>
> The FACTS are that bees are dying off and that we're in deep sh*t unless 
> this fact can be reversed...
>
>
> Michael Madigan wrote:
>   
>> Junk science rules
>>
>> CO2 causes global warming
>>
>> WIFI kills bees
>>
>> What will they think of next?
>>
>>
>> --- Chet Gardiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>   
>> 
>>> Actually I would expect the mammals to go with a
>>> whimper not a bang...
>>>
>>> A million fold increase in RF radiation, mess up a
>>> critically important 
>>> species like bees, causes the destruction of major
>>> food supplies, 
>>> increase in diseases; kabloowie, -- end of large
>>> mammals...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> MB Software Solutions wrote:
>>> 
>>>   
>> http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070521/ap_on_hi_te/municipal_wireless_woes
>>   
>> 
 Was widely available WiFi across big cities really
   
 
>>> a big deal to get 
>>> 
>>>   
 anyway?  It sounded like more headaches/hurdles
   
 
>>> than worth the promise, 
>>> 
>>>   
 imo.  And don't forget the harmful effects to
   
 
>>> Mother Nature's bees!  
>>> 
>>>   
 (Just kidding on that last point...that's
   
 
>>> speculation!)
>>> 
>>>   
   
   
 
>>> ___
>>> Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
>>> Subscription Maintenance:
>>> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
>>> OT-free version of this list:
>>> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
>>> Searchable Archive:
>>> http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
>>> This message:
>>>
>>> 
>>>   
>> http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>   
>> 
>>> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise,
>>> are the opinions of the author, and do not
>>> constitute legal or medical advice. This statement
>>> is added to the messages for those lawyers who are
>>> too stupid to see the obvious.
>>>
>>> 
>>>   
>>
>> 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: Portable Drive

[john harvey]

I do it all the time using vfp9. It will also work in previous versions. You
just need the runtime files to go with it.

JH

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ajoy Khaund
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 9:09 PM
To: Profox
Subject: Portable Drive

Hi
Is it possible to Load VFP 8 or Vfp 6 to a portable drive and carry it to a
clients place and plug it into his PC USB port which does not have the
development version of VFP and run VFP from the fash drive.

TIA


Ajoy Khaund
Neamati Road
Near Bhogdoi Bridge
Jorhat 785 001
Assam, India

Tel: 91-376-2351288
Cell: 91-94350-92287
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

"Walking on water and developing software from a specification are easy if
both are frozen."
- Edward  V. Berard, "Life-Cycle Approaches"

--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]@shelbynet.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Portable Drive

[Ajoy Khaund]

Hi
Is it possible to Load VFP 8 or Vfp 6 to a portable drive and carry it to a 
clients place and plug it into his PC USB port which does not have the 
development version of VFP and run VFP from the fash drive.

TIA


Ajoy Khaund
Neamati Road
Near Bhogdoi Bridge
Jorhat 785 001
Assam, India

Tel: 91-376-2351288
Cell: 91-94350-92287
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

"Walking on water and developing software from a specification are easy if
both are frozen."
- Edward  V. Berard, "Life-Cycle Approaches"

--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Cities struggle with wireless Internet

[Chet Gardiner]

Dingoes Eat Their Babies...:-)

Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
> Fireants...
> They eat their babies...
>
>
> Virgil Bierschwale
> http://www.bierschwale.com
> http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Chet Gardiner
> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 8:27 PM
> To: profox@leafe.com
> Subject: Re: [NF] Cities struggle with wireless Internet
>
> No one is saying it "kills bees". 
>
> The hypothesis is that all of the stray RF MAY be throwing off their 
> amazing navigation systems.  They find flowers and get tell their 
> fellows where they found them...
>
> It's not proved but it's surely possible...
>
> The FACTS are that bees are dying off and that we're in deep sh*t unless 
> this fact can be reversed...
>
>
> Michael Madigan wrote:
>   
>> Junk science rules
>>
>> CO2 causes global warming
>>
>> WIFI kills bees
>>
>> What will they think of next?
>>
>>
>> --- Chet Gardiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>   
>> 
>>> Actually I would expect the mammals to go with a
>>> whimper not a bang...
>>>
>>> A million fold increase in RF radiation, mess up a
>>> critically important 
>>> species like bees, causes the destruction of major
>>> food supplies, 
>>> increase in diseases; kabloowie, -- end of large
>>> mammals...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> MB Software Solutions wrote:
>>> 
>>>   
>> http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070521/ap_on_hi_te/municipal_wireless_woes
>>   
>> 
 Was widely available WiFi across big cities really
   
 
>>> a big deal to get 
>>> 
>>>   
 anyway?  It sounded like more headaches/hurdles
   
 
>>> than worth the promise, 
>>> 
>>>   
 imo.  And don't forget the harmful effects to
   
 
>>> Mother Nature's bees!  
>>> 
>>>   
 (Just kidding on that last point...that's
   
 
>>> speculation!)
>>> 
>>>   
   
   
 
>>> ___
>>> Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
>>> Subscription Maintenance:
>>> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
>>> OT-free version of this list:
>>> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
>>> Searchable Archive:
>>> http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
>>> This message:
>>>
>>> 
>>>   
>> http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>   
>> 
>>> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise,
>>> are the opinions of the author, and do not
>>> constitute legal or medical advice. This statement
>>> is added to the messages for those lawyers who are
>>> too stupid to see the obvious.
>>>
>>> 
>>>   
>>
>> 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [NF] Cities struggle with wireless Internet

[Virgil Bierschwale]

Fireants...
They eat their babies...


Virgil Bierschwale
http://www.bierschwale.com
http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Chet Gardiner
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 8:27 PM
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] Cities struggle with wireless Internet

No one is saying it "kills bees". 

The hypothesis is that all of the stray RF MAY be throwing off their 
amazing navigation systems.  They find flowers and get tell their 
fellows where they found them...

It's not proved but it's surely possible...

The FACTS are that bees are dying off and that we're in deep sh*t unless 
this fact can be reversed...


Michael Madigan wrote:
> Junk science rules
>
> CO2 causes global warming
>
> WIFI kills bees
>
> What will they think of next?
>
>
> --- Chet Gardiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>   
>> Actually I would expect the mammals to go with a
>> whimper not a bang...
>>
>> A million fold increase in RF radiation, mess up a
>> critically important 
>> species like bees, causes the destruction of major
>> food supplies, 
>> increase in diseases; kabloowie, -- end of large
>> mammals...
>>
>>
>>
>> MB Software Solutions wrote:
>> 
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070521/ap_on_hi_te/municipal_wireless_woes
>   
>>> Was widely available WiFi across big cities really
>>>   
>> a big deal to get 
>> 
>>> anyway?  It sounded like more headaches/hurdles
>>>   
>> than worth the promise, 
>> 
>>> imo.  And don't forget the harmful effects to
>>>   
>> Mother Nature's bees!  
>> 
>>> (Just kidding on that last point...that's
>>>   
>> speculation!)
>> 
>>>   
>>>   
>> ___
>> Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
>> Subscription Maintenance:
>> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
>> OT-free version of this list:
>> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
>> Searchable Archive:
>> http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
>> This message:
>>
>> 
> http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   
>> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise,
>> are the opinions of the author, and do not
>> constitute legal or medical advice. This statement
>> is added to the messages for those lawyers who are
>> too stupid to see the obvious.
>>
>> 
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Cities struggle with wireless Internet

[Chet Gardiner]

No one is saying it "kills bees". 

The hypothesis is that all of the stray RF MAY be throwing off their 
amazing navigation systems.  They find flowers and get tell their 
fellows where they found them...

It's not proved but it's surely possible...

The FACTS are that bees are dying off and that we're in deep sh*t unless 
this fact can be reversed...


Michael Madigan wrote:
> Junk science rules
>
> CO2 causes global warming
>
> WIFI kills bees
>
> What will they think of next?
>
>
> --- Chet Gardiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>   
>> Actually I would expect the mammals to go with a
>> whimper not a bang...
>>
>> A million fold increase in RF radiation, mess up a
>> critically important 
>> species like bees, causes the destruction of major
>> food supplies, 
>> increase in diseases; kabloowie, -- end of large
>> mammals...
>>
>>
>>
>> MB Software Solutions wrote:
>> 
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070521/ap_on_hi_te/municipal_wireless_woes
>   
>>> Was widely available WiFi across big cities really
>>>   
>> a big deal to get 
>> 
>>> anyway?  It sounded like more headaches/hurdles
>>>   
>> than worth the promise, 
>> 
>>> imo.  And don't forget the harmful effects to
>>>   
>> Mother Nature's bees!  
>> 
>>> (Just kidding on that last point...that's
>>>   
>> speculation!)
>> 
>>>   
>>>   
>> ___
>> Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
>> Subscription Maintenance:
>> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
>> OT-free version of this list:
>> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
>> Searchable Archive:
>> http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
>> This message:
>>
>> 
> http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   
>> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise,
>> are the opinions of the author, and do not
>> constitute legal or medical advice. This statement
>> is added to the messages for those lawyers who are
>> too stupid to see the obvious.
>>
>> 
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: VB to VFP

[Stephen the Cook]

Ed Leafe <> wrote:
> On May 23, 2007, at 8:26 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> Simple how to make a guid in VFP.  Simple did I say?
>> 
>> Bad Steve!
> 
>   Of course, it's a one-liner in Dabo, and you have your choice of
> random or machine/network-based UUIDs. 

Holy shit!  Like this?

Dim myGUID As Guid = myGUID.NewGuid

Oh and I can make on off the menu as well if I needed the text value.  

Don't you love the new tools?




Stephen Russell
DBA / .Net Developer

Memphis TN 38115
901.246-0159

"A good way to judge people is by observing how they treat those who
can do them absolutely no good." ---Unknown

http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.7.6/815 - Release Date: 5/22/2007
3:49 PM
 



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] GWB: Al-Qaeda Fund Raiser

[Pete Theisen]

On Wednesday 23 May 2007 8:26 pm, Helio W. wrote:
> Pete is another example of a righteous christian. Hipocrite,
> frustrated, always blame others for his own failures.

Hi Helio!

You have it all figured out, no one would ever be able to tell you different. 
That's why you would be perfect to head the World Bank.
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Cities struggle with wireless Internet

[Michael Madigan]

Junk science rules

CO2 causes global warming

WIFI kills bees

What will they think of next?


--- Chet Gardiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Actually I would expect the mammals to go with a
> whimper not a bang...
> 
> A million fold increase in RF radiation, mess up a
> critically important 
> species like bees, causes the destruction of major
> food supplies, 
> increase in diseases; kabloowie, -- end of large
> mammals...
> 
> 
> 
> MB Software Solutions wrote:
> >
>
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070521/ap_on_hi_te/municipal_wireless_woes
> >
> > Was widely available WiFi across big cities really
> a big deal to get 
> > anyway?  It sounded like more headaches/hurdles
> than worth the promise, 
> > imo.  And don't forget the harmful effects to
> Mother Nature's bees!  
> > (Just kidding on that last point...that's
> speculation!)
> >
> >   
> 
> 
> ___
> Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
> Subscription Maintenance:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
> OT-free version of this list:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
> Searchable Archive:
> http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
> This message:
>
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise,
> are the opinions of the author, and do not
> constitute legal or medical advice. This statement
> is added to the messages for those lawyers who are
> too stupid to see the obvious.
> 



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] society as it really is

[Michael Madigan]

Explains your endess problems with XP. LOL

--- Chet Gardiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> As one who was there and remembers (a lot of it ),
> we didn't have much 
> worth "dropping into".  Dropping out and using
> "drugs" was the rational 
> response to the paternalistic, booze fed hypocrisy
> and insanity of the 
> 50s/60s.  


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] GWB: Al-Qaeda Fund Raiser

[Michael Madigan]

Why so angry Helio? Bad childhood?



--- "Helio W." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Pete is another example of a righteous christian.
> Hipocrite,
> frustrated, always blame others for his own
> failures.
> 
> 
> On 5/23/07, Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Pete Theisen wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 23 May 2007 12:20 pm, Nicholas Geti
> wrote:
> > >>> You don't give a rat's ass for the Iraqis!
> > >> I sure don't. I say nuke a town for every G.I.
> that is killed.
> > >
> > > Hi Nicholas!
> > >
> > > No, too much radiation released into the
> atmosphere, to say nothing of the
> > > women and children.
> >
> > That didn't stop you at Hiroshima or Nagasaki.
> >
> > > Instead, round up 5000 male 'slims and put them
> in an
> > > interment camp for each GI killed, including
> previous killings.
> >
> > Yeah! The Nazi's used to do that in France. They
> were judged in
> > Nuremberg for that, though.
> >
> > >
> > > In a few weeks all the 'slims would be in the
> camp and no more killings,
> > > except in the camp. These towns are not that
> big, if I understand the
> > > situation correctly.
> >
> > Bulllshhi! You don't have the money or the
> personnel to do that.
> > A police state is expensive, not economically
> sound.
> >
> 
> 
> ___
> Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
> Subscription Maintenance:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
> OT-free version of this list:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
> Searchable Archive:
> http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
> This message:
>
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise,
> are the opinions of the author, and do not
> constitute legal or medical advice. This statement
> is added to the messages for those lawyers who are
> too stupid to see the obvious.
> 



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] GWB: Al-Qaeda Fund Raiser

[Helio W.]

Pete is another example of a righteous christian. Hipocrite,
frustrated, always blame others for his own failures.


On 5/23/07, Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pete Theisen wrote:
> > On Wednesday 23 May 2007 12:20 pm, Nicholas Geti wrote:
> >>> You don't give a rat's ass for the Iraqis!
> >> I sure don't. I say nuke a town for every G.I. that is killed.
> >
> > Hi Nicholas!
> >
> > No, too much radiation released into the atmosphere, to say nothing of the
> > women and children.
>
> That didn't stop you at Hiroshima or Nagasaki.
>
> > Instead, round up 5000 male 'slims and put them in an
> > interment camp for each GI killed, including previous killings.
>
> Yeah! The Nazi's used to do that in France. They were judged in
> Nuremberg for that, though.
>
> >
> > In a few weeks all the 'slims would be in the camp and no more killings,
> > except in the camp. These towns are not that big, if I understand the
> > situation correctly.
>
> Bulllshhi! You don't have the money or the personnel to do that.
> A police state is expensive, not economically sound.
>


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] GWB: Al-Qaeda Fund Raiser

[Michael Madigan]

What does egothistical mean?


--- "Helio W." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Wow, MadandGay is really evil and egothistical. No
> wonder most right
> wing christians are corrupt to the bone
> 
> On 5/23/07, Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Michael Madigan wrote:
> > > I thought you Atheists believed in Darwinism.
> > >
> >
> > Yes. That's what I'm saying. Next time hurricane
> strikes just tell Dubya
> > to do the usual. Less poor US citizens to go into
> the army, less trouble
> > for the rest of the world. Death is good for you
> people, specially if
> > you are poor.
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Michael Madigan wrote:
> > >>> While we're at it, let's not forget all the
> money
> > >> that
> > >>> we sent to tsunami victims that wound up in Al
> > >>> Quaeda's bank accounts.
> > >>>
> > >>> Next time, let's let them all die.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >> Yeah! Like you let die people in New Orleans.
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] GWB: Al-Qaeda Fund Raiser

[Pete Theisen]

On Wednesday 23 May 2007 7:42 pm, Helio W. wrote:
> Wow, MadandGay is really evil and egothistical. No wonder most right
> wing christians are corrupt to the bone

Hi Helio!

You get the Non Sequitur award for today. Congratulations.
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [NF] Cities struggle with wireless Internet

[Jeff Johnson]

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Virgil Bierschwale
> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 12:10 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [NF] Cities struggle with wireless Internet
> 
> There has always been problems with rf.
> The difference is military and other commercial rf is high power,
> typically
> more then 1,000 watts.
> 
> Wifi, cell phone, wireless phones are typically less then 5 watts
> 
> The higher power stuff will physically burn you if you're exposed to it
> when
> transmitting, but the lower power stuff is harmless in my opinion.
> 
> Virgil Bierschwale
> http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com
> http://www.jobsforourfuture.com/index.php
> 

Anybody guess what a 700 watt 2.45 Ghz transmitter is used for?  Most of us
have them.  Virgil, don't give it away.

My 2 cents:  I carry on conversations with people half way around the world
using less than 5 watts.  It's called QRP in case you are interested.  In
order to receive the waves that far away, you need an antenna that is the
correct length to resonate.  A full wave antenna for your 2.5 ghz wireless
system would be about 29".  Half a wave and a quarter wave will resonate
also.  I believe that any conductor 29" or 14.5" or 7.25" will resonate.  I
further believe that anything in your body (nerves or blood vessels) at
those lengths will resonate and create heat better than other lengths.
Although the affect is minimal based on the power and distance from the
transmitter, I think it has an effect and I act accordingly.

For several years the ham radio license tests have included radio frequency
safety.

I have noticed my ear getting hot when talking on the cell phone for
extended times and have switched to a headset for those calls.

This is my understanding of the affects of radio waves and may not be anyone
elses.  

Jeff

Jeff Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
623-582-0323
Fax 623-869-0675



--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/signed
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  application/x-pkcs7-signature
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] GWB: Al-Qaeda Fund Raiser

[Helio W.]

Wow, MadandGay is really evil and egothistical. No wonder most right
wing christians are corrupt to the bone

On 5/23/07, Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Madigan wrote:
> > I thought you Atheists believed in Darwinism.
> >
>
> Yes. That's what I'm saying. Next time hurricane strikes just tell Dubya
> to do the usual. Less poor US citizens to go into the army, less trouble
> for the rest of the world. Death is good for you people, specially if
> you are poor.
>
> >
> >
> > --- Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Michael Madigan wrote:
> >>> While we're at it, let's not forget all the money
> >> that
> >>> we sent to tsunami victims that wound up in Al
> >>> Quaeda's bank accounts.
> >>>
> >>> Next time, let's let them all die.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Yeah! Like you let die people in New Orleans.
> >>
> >>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] society as it really is

[Chet Gardiner]

I hope he sues the pants off of m$

Paul Hill wrote:
> On 5/22/07, Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   
>> On May 22, 2007, at 4:38 PM, David Crooks wrote:
>>
>> 
  Hippy?
 
  ??
 
  What the hell does that mean?
 
>>> From Dictionary.com:
>>>   
>> Well, duh... I know what the word itself means. I meant what does a
>> group of feel-good, dope-smoking burnouts from over a quarter-century
>> ago have to do with Linux? It was about as lame an attempt at making
>> a point as I've seen on the non-OT list, and rivals some of the
>> lamest on the OT side of things.
>> 
>
> Erm,
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Cox
>
> :-)
>
>   


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Cities struggle with wireless Internet

[Chet Gardiner]

Unlike three of the republican candidates for prez, you DO believe in 
evolution, don't you?

Chet Gardiner wrote:
> Different wavelengths and the exposure hasn't dramatically changed since 
> we evolved to deal with them.
>
> The saturation of urban areas with RF is a new phenomena.
>
>
> Michael Madigan wrote:
>   
>> What about gamma rays and solar rays and cosmic rays?
>>
>>
>> --- Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>   
>> 
>>> Didn’t they also say there is no link to mobile
>>> phones and health. I think
>>> its inverse scare mongering myself. What with radio
>>> phones, cell phones,
>>> wifi, radio and tv, there is so much radiation
>>> around it cant be that good
>>> for us. Says me with all that and more in the house.
>>> Allen 
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>>> Behalf Of Tristan Leask
>>> Sent: 22 May 2007 12:23
>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Subject: RE: [NF] Cities struggle with wireless
>>> Internet
>>>
>>>
>>> This programme...
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>>   
>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/panorama/6674675.stm
>>   
>> 
>>> This response says it all really.  That the
>>> programme creators are
>>> talking tosh...
>>>
>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6676129.stm
>>>
>>> Tristan
>>>
>>> No virus found in this outgoing message.
>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
>>> Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.7.6/814 -
>>> Release Date: 21/05/2007
>>> 14:01
>>>  
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
>>> Subscription Maintenance:
>>> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
>>> OT-free version of this list:
>>> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
>>> Searchable Archive:
>>> http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
>>> This message:
>>>
>>> 
>>>   
>> http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>   
>> 
>>> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise,
>>> are the opinions of the author, and do not
>>> constitute legal or medical advice. This statement
>>> is added to the messages for those lawyers who are
>>> too stupid to see the obvious.
>>>
>>> 
>>>   
>>
>> 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Cities struggle with wireless Internet

[Chet Gardiner]

Different wavelengths and the exposure hasn't dramatically changed since 
we evolved to deal with them.

The saturation of urban areas with RF is a new phenomena.


Michael Madigan wrote:
> What about gamma rays and solar rays and cosmic rays?
>
>
> --- Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>   
>> Didn’t they also say there is no link to mobile
>> phones and health. I think
>> its inverse scare mongering myself. What with radio
>> phones, cell phones,
>> wifi, radio and tv, there is so much radiation
>> around it cant be that good
>> for us. Says me with all that and more in the house.
>> Allen 
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>> Behalf Of Tristan Leask
>> Sent: 22 May 2007 12:23
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: RE: [NF] Cities struggle with wireless
>> Internet
>>
>>
>> This programme...
>>
>>
>> 
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/panorama/6674675.stm
>   
>> This response says it all really.  That the
>> programme creators are
>> talking tosh...
>>
>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6676129.stm
>>
>> Tristan
>>
>> No virus found in this outgoing message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
>> Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.7.6/814 -
>> Release Date: 21/05/2007
>> 14:01
>>  
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
>> Subscription Maintenance:
>> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
>> OT-free version of this list:
>> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
>> Searchable Archive:
>> http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
>> This message:
>>
>> 
> http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   
>> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise,
>> are the opinions of the author, and do not
>> constitute legal or medical advice. This statement
>> is added to the messages for those lawyers who are
>> too stupid to see the obvious.
>>
>> 
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Cities struggle with wireless Internet

[Chet Gardiner]

Brains work on electricity.  Brains handle supervision of bodily 
functions.  We're dealing with a billion times more RF radiation than 
ever...

I think of 6 billion monkeys tinkering with stuff they don't understand 
and can't understand...

Jim Dettman wrote:
> Alan,
>
>   No one really knows that we haven't.  Cancer in all forms is on the rise
> as are other things such as Autism.  Interesting study done not to long ago
> in the state of Texas.  They mapped the number of cases of Autism across the
> state and then compared that to the most heavily industrialized counties in
> the state.  It was almost a one to one correlation.  The more industry, the
> more Autism.  Who's to say with 100% certainty that monitors have not caused
> health problems?
>
>   I think the only safe thing to say is that we affect our environment in
> many ways beyond what we understand and that the world is changing.
>
> Jim.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Alan Bourke
> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 7:05 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [NF] Cities struggle with wireless Internet
>
> This sort of reminds me about how, in the days of CRT monitors, how we 
> were all going to die from monitor radiation.
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Cities struggle with wireless Internet

[Chet Gardiner]

Yescould be...

We've only been experimenting on ourselves with RF for the last 100 
years or so...


Michael Madigan wrote:
> If there's something wrong with wifi, then there's
> something wrong with cell phones and wireless phones.
>
>
>
> --- Tristan Leask <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>   
>> That Panorama show was utter crap.  A lot of scare
>> mongering!  There is
>> nothing wrong with Wifi.
>>
>> Tristan
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Behalf Of Allen
>> Posted At: 22 May 2007 10:25
>> Posted To: Profox Archive
>> Conversation: [NF] Cities struggle with wireless
>> Internet
>> Subject: RE: [NF] Cities struggle with wireless
>> Internet
>>
>> Someone said that wifi was pretty bad and I think
>> some schools have
>> banned
>> it. More harmful than mobile phones it said.
>> Allen 
>>
>>
>> 
> --
>   
>> This email was sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unless
>> otherwise agreed expressly in writing by Marine
>> Software Limited, 
>> this communication and attachments are to be treated
>> as confidential 
>> and the information in it may not be used or
>> disclosed except for the 
>> purpose for which it was sent.
>> If you are not the intended recipient of this 
>> communication  you should 
>> destroy it without copying, disclosing or otherwise
>> using its contents.
>> Please notify the sender immediately of the error. 
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> Marine Software Limited. Registered in England &
>> Wales. No 2576494
>> Regsitered Office. Unit3, Aylesham Business Pk,
>> Aylesham. Kent. UK
>>
>> 
> --
>   
>>
>> ___
>> Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
>> Subscription Maintenance:
>> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
>> OT-free version of this list:
>> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
>> Searchable Archive:
>> http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
>> This message:
>>
>> 
> http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   
>> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise,
>> are the opinions of the author, and do not
>> constitute legal or medical advice. This statement
>> is added to the messages for those lawyers who are
>> too stupid to see the obvious.
>>
>> 
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Cities struggle with wireless Internet

[Chet Gardiner]

Actually I would expect the mammals to go with a whimper not a bang...

A million fold increase in RF radiation, mess up a critically important 
species like bees, causes the destruction of major food supplies, 
increase in diseases; kabloowie, -- end of large mammals...



MB Software Solutions wrote:
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070521/ap_on_hi_te/municipal_wireless_woes
>
> Was widely available WiFi across big cities really a big deal to get 
> anyway?  It sounded like more headaches/hurdles than worth the promise, 
> imo.  And don't forget the harmful effects to Mother Nature's bees!  
> (Just kidding on that last point...that's speculation!)
>
>   


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] GWB: Al-Qaeda Fund Raiser

[Ricardo Aráoz]

Michael Madigan wrote:
> I thought you Atheists believed in Darwinism.
> 

Yes. That's what I'm saying. Next time hurricane strikes just tell Dubya
to do the usual. Less poor US citizens to go into the army, less trouble
for the rest of the world. Death is good for you people, specially if
you are poor.

> 
> 
> --- Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>> Michael Madigan wrote:
>>> While we're at it, let's not forget all the money
>> that
>>> we sent to tsunami victims that wound up in Al
>>> Quaeda's bank accounts.
>>>
>>> Next time, let's let them all die.
>>>
>>>
>> Yeah! Like you let die people in New Orleans.
>>
>>


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Screen mockup of job we're probably bidding on soon

[Chet Gardiner]

Make sure you pass it by the folks who will have to do the work...

MB Software Solutions wrote:
> http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com/downloads/remmey/scheduler/scheduler_screenshot.png
>
> Making this screen mockup was fun!  I kinda hope we get the job.  Could 
> be a PITA, but "when" we pull it off, it'll be pretty slick!  ;-)
>
>   


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] GWB: Al-Qaeda Fund Raiser

[Ricardo Aráoz]

Pete Theisen wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 May 2007 12:20 pm, Nicholas Geti wrote:
>>> You don't give a rat's ass for the Iraqis!
>> I sure don't. I say nuke a town for every G.I. that is killed.
> 
> Hi Nicholas!
> 
> No, too much radiation released into the atmosphere, to say nothing of the 
> women and children.

That didn't stop you at Hiroshima or Nagasaki.

> Instead, round up 5000 male 'slims and put them in an 
> interment camp for each GI killed, including previous killings.

Yeah! The Nazi's used to do that in France. They were judged in
Nuremberg for that, though.

> 
> In a few weeks all the 'slims would be in the camp and no more killings, 
> except in the camp. These towns are not that big, if I understand the 
> situation correctly.

Bulllshhi! You don't have the money or the personnel to do that.
A police state is expensive, not economically sound.


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] GWB: Al-Qaeda Fund Raiser

[Michael Madigan]

I thought you Atheists believed in Darwinism.



--- Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Michael Madigan wrote:
> > While we're at it, let's not forget all the money
> that
> > we sent to tsunami victims that wound up in Al
> > Quaeda's bank accounts.
> > 
> > Next time, let's let them all die.
> > 
> > 
> 
> Yeah! Like you let die people in New Orleans.
> 
> 
> ___
> Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
> Subscription Maintenance:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
> OT-free version of this list:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
> Searchable Archive:
> http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
> This message:
>
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise,
> are the opinions of the author, and do not
> constitute legal or medical advice. This statement
> is added to the messages for those lawyers who are
> too stupid to see the obvious.
> 



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] GWB: Al-Qaeda Fund Raiser

[Ricardo Aráoz]

Nicholas Geti wrote:
> It sure would relieve the pressure on the environment. The world is getting 
> too populated.

I'd rather have you and your family killed.

> 
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Derek Kalweit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "ProFox Email List" 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 2:07 PM
> Subject: Re: [OT] GWB: Al-Qaeda Fund Raiser
> 
> 
 I sure don't. I say nuke a town for every G.I. that is killed.
>>> Ah, so then if another country invades the US, they would be
>>> justified in nuking a US town for every invader killed.
>>> What goes around, comes around.
>> Until everyone is dead.
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Derek
>>


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] society as it really is

[Chet Gardiner]

You're full of crap -- we don't avoid baths!:-)  :-)

As one who was there and remembers (a lot of it ), we didn't have much 
worth "dropping into".  Dropping out and using "drugs" was the rational 
response to the paternalistic, booze fed hypocrisy and insanity of the 
50s/60s.  And for anyone paying attention, there's even less worth 
"dropping into" now...

As for Open Source -- the values of the Open Source community are a 
breath of fresh air...build it out of a sense of freedom and 
intellectual curiosity and if you make a buck, cool, if not, you still 
have the satisfaction of doing it.


Michael Madigan wrote:
> Come on, many Linux users are just using Linux as an
> anti-establishment statement, much like Hippies were
> doing.
>
> Of course Linux users add much much more to society
> than hippies do.  I don't want to compare the
> net-value of a linux user to drug-using,
> bath-avoiding, tune-in-and-drop-out hippie.
>
> Reminds me of a friend who would listen to underground
> bands until they hit it big, then he would drop them
> for being "sell-outs".
>
>
>
>
> --- Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>   
>> On May 22, 2007, at 4:38 PM, David Crooks wrote:
>>
>> 
Hippy?
 
??
 
What the hell does that mean?
 
>>> From Dictionary.com:
>>>   
>>  Well, duh... I know what the word itself means. I
>> meant what does a  
>> group of feel-good, dope-smoking burnouts from over
>> a quarter-century  
>> ago have to do with Linux? It was about as lame an
>> attempt at making  
>> a point as I've seen on the non-OT list, and rivals
>> some of the  
>> lamest on the OT side of things.
>>
>>  I was just hoping that there is some inside joke in
>> there that I was  
>> missing, rather than it simply being a dumb post
>> that reflects more  
>> on the poster than on the intended target.
>>
>> -- Ed Leafe
>> -- http://leafe.com
>> -- http://dabodev.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
>> Subscription Maintenance:
>> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
>> OT-free version of this list:
>> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
>> Searchable Archive:
>> http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
>> This message:
>>
>> 
> http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   
>> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise,
>> are the opinions of the author, and do not
>> constitute legal or medical advice. This statement
>> is added to the messages for those lawyers who are
>> too stupid to see the obvious.
>>
>> 
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] GWB: Al-Qaeda Fund Raiser

[Ricardo Aráoz]

Michael Madigan wrote:
> While we're at it, let's not forget all the money that
> we sent to tsunami victims that wound up in Al
> Quaeda's bank accounts.
> 
> Next time, let's let them all die.
> 
> 

Yeah! Like you let die people in New Orleans.


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] GWB: Al-Qaeda Fund Raiser

[Ricardo Aráoz]

Nicholas Geti wrote:
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Ricardo Aráoz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "ProFox Email List" 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 10:29 PM
> Subject: Re: [OT] GWB: Al-Qaeda Fund Raiser
> 
> 
>> Please!
>> CIA has brought enough "democracy" to my corner of the world, we know
>> your "democracy", your coups, your invasions, your dictators.
>> Stop being such hypocrites! You don't give a rat's ass for the Iraqis!
>>
> 
> I sure don't. I say nuke a town for every G.I. that is killed.
> 

Isn't it easier to get the fucking G.I.'s out of where they are not
welcome? It's the other end of the world from you! Absolutely no reason
for you to be there! (well, at least no GOOD or HONORABLE reason).


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] GWB: Al-Qaeda Fund Raiser

[Ricardo Aráoz]

Robert Calco wrote:
> Speaking of enemy activity:
> 
> The Dems are caving on the troop withdrawal provision:
> 
> http://tinyurl.com/2dqbjr
> 
> Maybe it has something to do with the fact that their strategy has  
> encouraged Iran and their Al Qaeda friends to use this summer's pre- 
> Patraeus report period to ramp up their proxy war against us (duh):
> 
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/frontpage/story/0,,2085195,00.html
> 
> Meanwhile of course Bush is caving too, planning to hand Iraq over to  
> the UN:
> 
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,2085981,00.html
> 
> It's certainly the smart thing to do politically---since the Dems  
> have been whining about how (for some inexplicable reason) only the  
> UN can solve the problem, let them adopt it and watch what happens  
> (poor Iraq)---but this whole thing is sad to watch because of the  
> manner in which political expediency has gotten the upper hand over  
> common sense and principle on all sides of the ostensible 'debate'.
> 
> If the Dems had not engaged in this unbelievable propaganda war to  
> demonize the President, we might have been able to crush the  
> terrorists in Iraq and given Iran all the incentive it needed to "do  
> the right thing".

Yes, of course. The Iraqi resistance had nothing to do whatsoever with
your uncomfortable military position there. It was the Dems propaganda
war that killed your 3000 soldiers. hahahaha!

> Instead, having gotten their precious power back,  
> the Dems have "lead" us to the point now that Iran is feeling its  
> oats and openly supporting the terrorists, and everyone is ducking  
> for cover.

After all it IS their "backyard" isn't it? Kind of Central America to
you people. Oh! I forgot! You NEVER had any involvement in Central America.

> 
> If something is falling yet, it will be soon. Sadly, we have assumed  
> that position.

You'll bite the dust again. And you had it coming Bobby.


> 
> - Bob
> 
> On May 22, 2007, at 10:50 PM, Pete Theisen wrote:
> 
>> On Tuesday 22 May 2007 8:49 pm, Ed Leafe wrote:
>>> http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/washingtondc/la-na-
>>> binladen20may20,1,3996913.story
>>> ( -or- http://tinyurl.com/ysm8ep )
>>>
>>> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>> U.S. officials say the terrorist network's command base is
>>> increasingly being funded by cash coming out of Iraq.
>>> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>> In one of the most troubling trends, U.S. officials said that Al
>>> Qaeda's command base in Pakistan is increasingly being funded by cash
>>> coming out of Iraq, where the terrorist network's operatives are
>>> raising substantial sums from donations to the anti-American
>>> insurgency as well as kidnappings of wealthy Iraqis and other
>>> criminal activity.
>>> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>
>>> Well done, all you Iraqi war supporters!
>> Hi Ed!
>>
>> What does anyone expect, a war without enemy activity? Well done  
>> all you US
>> traitors!
>> -- 
>> Regards,
>>
>> Pete
>> http://www.pete-theisen.com/
>>


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [OT] And ya'll want the government to protect us ??

[Jerry Wolper]

> I don't blame them, but I can see next door neighbors being arrested for
> using their neighbors wireless connection..
> 
> Common sense would tell me that the limit needs to be whatever the range of
> the signal is, not fixed boundaries such as a wall.

If there's enough call for government (at whatever level) to 
officially define such limits, they will. People like the original 
blogger you quoted will disagree loudly if they feel differently.

Until then, whether we're talking about the cafe or your example of 
neighbors, government/police don't get involved until there's a 
complaint. I only bring this up because of the subject line you put 
on this; government is responding to citizens, not patrolling 
arbitrarily for WiFi violators.

-Jerry Wolper
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] And ya'll want the government to protect us ??

[Ed Leafe]

On May 23, 2007, at 5:58 PM, Jerry Wolper wrote:

> I'll guess that he wasn't arrested because the police WiFi squad was
> running around with antennas looking for violators, but because the
> Cafe complained that he was using their bandwidth without buying
> something from them. If it was a complaint from Cafe management, you
> really can't blame government for this.

Yeah, and if I leave the receipts for the cafe lying around  
unprotected in the parking lot, it's a crime for you to pocket them.

Sorry, but the onus should be on the one with the asset they want to  
restrict to do the restricting.

-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [OT] And ya'll want the government to protect us ??

[Michael Madigan]

I noticed my connections were rather slow one day and
checked who was attached to my router, and found 2
other neighbors logged in.

Instead of calling the police, I turned on security.

A remedy for the coffee house would be to change the
password every day and only give the password out to
someone who's purchased coffee.


--- Virgil Bierschwale
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I don't blame them, but I can see next door
> neighbors being arrested for
> using their neighbors wireless connection..
> 
> Common sense would tell me that the limit needs to
> be whatever the range of
> the signal is, not fixed boundaries such as a wall.
> 
> Virgil Bierschwale
> http://www.bierschwale.com
> http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Jerry Wolper
> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 4:58 PM
> To: ProFox Email List
> Subject: Re: [OT] And ya'll want the government to
> protect us ??
> 
> > Sam Peterson was arrested when he used the Union
> Street Cafe's hot spot
> > by parking his car nearby, rather than going
> inside and buying a drink.
> 
> I'll guess that he wasn't arrested because the
> police WiFi squad was 
> running around with antennas looking for violators,
> but because the 
> Cafe complained that he was using their bandwidth
> without buying 
> something from them. If it was a complaint from Cafe
> management, you 
> really can't blame government for this.
> 
> -Jerry Wolper
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] code question

[Paul Newton]

Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
> Don't mind them paul.
>
> They're just getting their rocks off because I was too busy trying to date
> the English teacher instead of paying attention.
> Either that or I was sleeping because I was bored to death.
>   

Virgil

What did the Englsih teacher teach that was so boring ?  And, pray, what 
nationality was your english teacher ?




Paul


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [NF] code question

[Virgil Bierschwale]

Don't mind them paul.

They're just getting their rocks off because I was too busy trying to date
the English teacher instead of paying attention.
Either that or I was sleeping because I was bored to death.

Virgil Bierschwale
http://www.bierschwale.com
http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Paul Newton
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 5:01 PM
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] code question

Ed Leafe wrote:
> On May 23, 2007, at 5:19 PM, Jean Laeremans wrote:
>
>   
>> Where have my old classmates and service friends gone TO ?"
>> 
>
>   To where have my old classmates and service friends gone?
>   

 Where have my old classmates and service 
friends gone ?

> -- Ed Leafe
> -- http://leafe.com
> -- http://dabodev.com
>
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] code question

[Paul Newton]

Ed Leafe wrote:
> On May 23, 2007, at 5:19 PM, Jean Laeremans wrote:
>
>   
>> Where have my old classmates and service friends gone TO ?"
>> 
>
>   To where have my old classmates and service friends gone?
>   

 Where have my old classmates and service 
friends gone ?

> -- Ed Leafe
> -- http://leafe.com
> -- http://dabodev.com
>
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [OT] And ya'll want the government to protect us ??

[Virgil Bierschwale]

I don't blame them, but I can see next door neighbors being arrested for
using their neighbors wireless connection..

Common sense would tell me that the limit needs to be whatever the range of
the signal is, not fixed boundaries such as a wall.

Virgil Bierschwale
http://www.bierschwale.com
http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Jerry Wolper
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 4:58 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] And ya'll want the government to protect us ??

> Sam Peterson was arrested when he used the Union Street Cafe's hot spot
> by parking his car nearby, rather than going inside and buying a drink.

I'll guess that he wasn't arrested because the police WiFi squad was 
running around with antennas looking for violators, but because the 
Cafe complained that he was using their bandwidth without buying 
something from them. If it was a complaint from Cafe management, you 
really can't blame government for this.

-Jerry Wolper
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] And ya'll want the government to protect us ??

[Jerry Wolper]

> Sam Peterson was arrested when he used the Union Street Cafe's hot spot
> by parking his car nearby, rather than going inside and buying a drink.

I'll guess that he wasn't arrested because the police WiFi squad was 
running around with antennas looking for violators, but because the 
Cafe complained that he was using their bandwidth without buying 
something from them. If it was a complaint from Cafe management, you 
really can't blame government for this.

-Jerry Wolper
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [NF] code question

[Virgil Bierschwale]

Not I

http://www.virgilslist.com/vjbtest.asp is what I was wanting to do..
Rewrote it using the second sample I sent..

Now I just need to write the edit and delete and get lat/lon functions and
merge it back into the original...

Oh well, must be about beer thirty somewhere...!!!


Virgil Bierschwale
http://www.bierschwale.com
http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Jean Laeremans
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 4:31 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [NF] code question

On 5/23/07, Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 23, 2007, at 5:19 PM, Jean Laeremans wrote:
>
> > Where have my old classmates and service friends gone TO ?"
>
> To where have my old classmates and service friends gone?
>

Sure, but who's going to believe Virgil wrote that ?

A+
jml


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] code question

[Jean Laeremans]

On 5/23/07, Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 23, 2007, at 5:19 PM, Jean Laeremans wrote:
>
> > Where have my old classmates and service friends gone TO ?"
>
> To where have my old classmates and service friends gone?
>

Sure, but who's going to believe Virgil wrote that ?

A+
jml


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] code question

[Ed Leafe]

On May 23, 2007, at 5:19 PM, Jean Laeremans wrote:

> Where have my old classmates and service friends gone TO ?"

To where have my old classmates and service friends gone?

-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Using DLLs

[Eurico Chagas Filho]

Hi

I have to call a DLL function to print some items, is there
 a way to call the DLL and move on to the next command without
waiting from the printing to finish ?

TIA, E.

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.7.6/815 - Release Date: 5/22/2007
3:49 PM
 



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] code question

[Jean Laeremans]

On 5/23/07, Virgil Bierschwale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Must not have come through correctly... Trying again
>
> http://www.virgilslist.com/roster.asp?branch=NAVY&unit=FF-1059

Where have my old classmates and service friends gone TO ?"

A+
jml


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] GWB: Al-Qaeda Fund Raiser

[Pete Theisen]

On Wednesday 23 May 2007 2:33 pm, Bill Arnold wrote:
> Here's a really good article on "collective punishment"
>
> http://www.uexpress.com/tedrall/index.html?uc_full_date=20060718

Hi Bill!

That's why the interment camp idea is better. They are just cooling their 
heels for a while, not dead. If they are guilty their compadres just might 
kill them.
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

[NF] Cosmic Rays cause IE to fail

[David Crooks]

http://blogs.pcworld.com/tipsandtweaks/archives/004463.html

I used to watch ScreenSavers on TechTV and wondered what happened to
Leo.

David L. Crooks



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [NF] code question

[Virgil Bierschwale]

Must not have come through correctly... Trying again

http://www.virgilslist.com/roster.asp?branch=NAVY&unit=FF-1059


Virgil Bierschwale
http://www.bierschwale.com
http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Jean Laeremans
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 4:04 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [NF] code question

On 5/23/07, Virgil Bierschwale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got this page here
>
> http://www.virgilslist.com/roster.asp?branch=NAVY

'Where have my old classmates and service friends gone too ?"

Ahum...

A+
jml


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] code question

[Jean Laeremans]

On 5/23/07, Virgil Bierschwale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got this page here
>
> http://www.virgilslist.com/roster.asp?branch=NAVY

'Where have my old classmates and service friends gone too ?"

Ahum...

A+
jml


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [NF] code question

[Virgil Bierschwale]

Thanks.
I wrote all this about a year ago and haven't had time to finish it.

Trying to finish it now and I've been looking at the w3schools.com examples

They give you enough to make you dangerous, but not enough to help, at least
in this case.

I'm considering rewriting it using this example just because its easier to
maintain, but the example shows using an access table and I can't find what
the proper syntax is for sql server in the following example.. 

I'll find it, just may have to drink a couple of beers and spend the evening
googling 




<%
set conn=Server.CreateObject("ADODB.Connection")
conn.Provider="Microsoft.Jet.OLEDB.4.0"
conn.Open "c:/webdata/northwind.mdb"

set rs = Server.CreateObject("ADODB.recordset")
rs.Open "SELECT * FROM Customers", conn

do until rs.EOF
  for each x in rs.Fields
Response.Write(x.name)
Response.Write(" = ")
Response.Write(x.value & "") 
  next
  Response.Write("")
  rs.MoveNext
loop

rs.close
conn.close
%>




Virgil Bierschwale
http://www.bierschwale.com
http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Derek Kalweit
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 3:57 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [NF] code question

> I'm wanting to write the delete and edit portions, so I added a field to
sql
> server for the record number.

> When I display this screen, all of the info is text, but the record number
> is an int.
>
> What command converts a int to a string in the following code ??

VBScript, which it appears is what you're using, does implicit
conversions from integers to strings when concatenating it using the &
operator, saving you from having to convert ever single integer. If
you need to force it, you can use the CStr function.

Note that you MUST make sure you use a quote() function whenever you
create SQL where clauses-- never just use single quotes on either
side, even if the text shouldn't have any embedded apostrophes. It
appears the field you're getting is from the query string-- a
malicious individual could use SQL injection to delete records from
your tables, drop databases, etc...

As for a quote function, this is the one I often use:

Function quote(q_q)
 quote = replace(q_q, "'", "''")
End Function


-- 
Derek


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] code question

[Derek Kalweit]

> I'm wanting to write the delete and edit portions, so I added a field to sql
> server for the record number.

> When I display this screen, all of the info is text, but the record number
> is an int.
>
> What command converts a int to a string in the following code ??

VBScript, which it appears is what you're using, does implicit
conversions from integers to strings when concatenating it using the &
operator, saving you from having to convert ever single integer. If
you need to force it, you can use the CStr function.

Note that you MUST make sure you use a quote() function whenever you
create SQL where clauses-- never just use single quotes on either
side, even if the text shouldn't have any embedded apostrophes. It
appears the field you're getting is from the query string-- a
malicious individual could use SQL injection to delete records from
your tables, drop databases, etc...

As for a quote function, this is the one I often use:

Function quote(q_q)
 quote = replace(q_q, "'", "''")
End Function


-- 
Derek


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

[NF] code question

[Virgil Bierschwale]

I've got this page here

http://www.virgilslist.com/roster.asp?branch=NAVY

&unit=FF-1059

 

I'm wanting to write the delete and edit portions, so I added a field to sql
server for the record number.

 

When I display this screen, all of the info is text, but the record number
is an int.

What command converts a int to a string in the following code ??

 

Been looking and I'm not finding it 

 

Thanks,

 

Virgil Bierschwale

http://www.bierschwale.com

http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com

 

 

 

 

 

fieldname1 = "svcbranch"

fieldname2 = "svcunit"

fieldname3 = "svcrate"

fieldname4 = "svcrank"

fieldname5 = "svclastname"

fieldname6 = "svcfirstname"

fieldname7 = "svccity"

fieldname8 = "svcstate"

fieldname9 = "svczip"

fieldname10 = "svconboard"

fieldname11 = "svcdeparted"

fieldname12 = "svclatitude"

fieldname13 = "svclongitude"

fieldname14 = "record_number"

 

connectstr = "Driver={SQL Server};SERVER=" & db_server & ";DATABASE=" &
db_name & ";UID=" & db_username & ";PWD=" & db_userpassword

 

Set oConn = Server.CreateObject("ADODB.Connection")

oConn.Open connectstr

 

qry = "SELECT " & fieldname1 & ", " & fieldname2 & ", " & fieldname3 & ", "
& fieldname6 & ", " & fieldname5 & ", " & fieldname7 & ", " & fieldname8 &
", " & fieldname9 & ", " & fieldname10 & ", " & fieldname11 & " FROM " &
tablename & " where " & fieldname2 & " = '" & svcBranch & "'"

Set oRS = oConn.Execute(qry)   



--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] GWB: Al-Qaeda Fund Raiser

[Jean Laeremans]

On 5/23/07, Nicholas Geti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It sure would relieve the pressure on the environment. The world is getting
> too populated.

Silly bugger

A+
jml


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] UMPC future prediction....what do you think?

[Ted Roche]

On 5/22/07, MB Software Solutions <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Cool!  VFP work mostly, or open source stuff?

I'm all LAMP, all the time since 2004. My partner is 100% VFP and
likely to stay that way, too.

-- 
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] GWB: Al-Qaeda Fund Raiser

[Nicholas Geti]

It sure would relieve the pressure on the environment. The world is getting 
too populated.

- Original Message - 
From: "Derek Kalweit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ProFox Email List" 
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 2:07 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] GWB: Al-Qaeda Fund Raiser


>> > I sure don't. I say nuke a town for every G.I. that is killed.
>
>> Ah, so then if another country invades the US, they would be
>> justified in nuking a US town for every invader killed.
>
>> What goes around, comes around.
>
> Until everyone is dead.
>
>
> -- 
> Derek
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [OT] GWB: Al-Qaeda Fund Raiser

[Michael Madigan]

While we're at it, let's not forget all the money that
we sent to tsunami victims that wound up in Al
Quaeda's bank accounts.

Next time, let's let them all die.




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [OT] GWB: Al-Qaeda Fund Raiser

[Bill Arnold]

Here's a really good article on "collective punishment"
 
http://www.uexpress.com/tedrall/index.html?uc_full_date=20060718


Bill


 
> > Please!
> > CIA has brought enough "democracy" to my corner of the world, we
know 
> > your "democracy", your coups, your invasions, your dictators. Stop 
> > being such hypocrites! You don't give a rat's ass for the Iraqis!
> >
> 
> I sure don't. I say nuke a town for every G.I. that is killed.



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] GWB: Al-Qaeda Fund Raiser

[Ed Leafe]

On May 23, 2007, at 2:07 PM, Derek Kalweit wrote:

> Until everyone is dead.

Well, yeah, that's the logical conclusion of such thinking.

-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [OT] GWB: Al-Qaeda Fund Raiser

[David Crooks]

On Wednesday, May 23, 2007 2:08 PM Derek Kalweit wrote:

>Until everyone is dead.

No one gets out alive!

David L. Crooks



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] GWB: Al-Qaeda Fund Raiser

[Derek Kalweit]

> > I sure don't. I say nuke a town for every G.I. that is killed.

> Ah, so then if another country invades the US, they would be
> justified in nuking a US town for every invader killed.

> What goes around, comes around.

Until everyone is dead.


-- 
Derek


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] GWB: Al-Qaeda Fund Raiser

[Ed Leafe]

On May 23, 2007, at 12:20 PM, Nicholas Geti wrote:

>> CIA has brought enough "democracy" to my corner of the world, we know
>> your "democracy", your coups, your invasions, your dictators.
>> Stop being such hypocrites! You don't give a rat's ass for the  
>> Iraqis!
>
> I sure don't. I say nuke a town for every G.I. that is killed.

Ah, so then if another country invades the US, they would be  
justified in nuking a US town for every invader killed.

What goes around, comes around.

-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] GWB: Al-Qaeda Fund Raiser

[Pete Theisen]

On Wednesday 23 May 2007 12:20 pm, Nicholas Geti wrote:
>>You don't give a rat's ass for the Iraqis!
>
> I sure don't. I say nuke a town for every G.I. that is killed.

Hi Nicholas!

No, too much radiation released into the atmosphere, to say nothing of the 
women and children. Instead, round up 5000 male 'slims and put them in an 
interment camp for each GI killed, including previous killings.

In a few weeks all the 'slims would be in the camp and no more killings, 
except in the camp. These towns are not that big, if I understand the 
situation correctly.

And seal the border so no more get in, for heaven's sake.
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [OT] And ya'll want the government to protect us ??

[Virgil Bierschwale]

That's what I'm talking about.
Its far easier to go after the law abiding citizen then it is to make waves
and hang the bastard that would actually steal, murder or sell drugs.

Virgil Bierschwale
http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com
http://www.jobsforourfuture.com/index.php


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Pete Theisen
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 12:07 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] And ya'll want the government to protect us ??

On Wednesday 23 May 2007 10:34 am, Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
> This is about as stupid as it gets in my opinion.
>
>
>
> 1. Use free Wi-Fi, go directly to jail
>
> Note to WiFi users: Free is not free. If you tap into a free hot spot, you
> could end up getting arrested.

Hi Virgil!

We have teenagers around here walking through the neighborhood checking car 
door handles to try to find a car unlocked. When they find one they ransack 
it, taking whatever they want from what they find.

The police catch them, but the judge lets them go. Somehow, I would prefer 
they sit around using free Wi-Fi, but no one ever listens to me on crime.
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] And ya'll want the government to protect us ??

[Pete Theisen]

On Wednesday 23 May 2007 10:34 am, Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
> This is about as stupid as it gets in my opinion.
>
>
>
> 1. Use free Wi-Fi, go directly to jail
>
> Note to WiFi users: Free is not free. If you tap into a free hot spot, you
> could end up getting arrested.

Hi Virgil!

We have teenagers around here walking through the neighborhood checking car 
door handles to try to find a car unlocked. When they find one they ransack 
it, taking whatever they want from what they find.

The police catch them, but the judge lets them go. Somehow, I would prefer 
they sit around using free Wi-Fi, but no one ever listens to me on crime.
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] GWB: Al-Qaeda Fund Raiser

[Nicholas Geti]

- Original Message - 
From: "Ricardo Aráoz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ProFox Email List" 
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 10:29 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] GWB: Al-Qaeda Fund Raiser


> Please!
> CIA has brought enough "democracy" to my corner of the world, we know
> your "democracy", your coups, your invasions, your dictators.
> Stop being such hypocrites! You don't give a rat's ass for the Iraqis!
>

I sure don't. I say nuke a town for every G.I. that is killed.



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Screen mockup of job we're probably bidding on soon

[Derek Kalweit]

> That way I can monitor the market on the 20"'ers and do my work on the
> 22"ers

Definitely. Don't spend gobs of money on mounts. I got a few at
monoprice.com for $13.xx/ea-- they're not awesome in quality, but they
work sufficiently well for me(I trust them to hold my panels). The
biggest complaint is the lag screws they come with-- just go right to
the hardware store and buy stronger ones to start.


-- 
Derek


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: Screen mockup of job we're probably bidding on soon

[Virgil Bierschwale]

That's what I'm thinking about doing.
Bought a dell and it came with the 20"

Looking at the two side by side, theres no comparison.

When I have the money, I will buy another dell with a 20" and a viewsonic
22"

That way I can monitor the market on the 20"'ers and do my work on the
22"ers


Virgil Bierschwale
http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com
http://www.jobsforourfuture.com/index.php


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Derek Kalweit
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 10:32 AM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: Screen mockup of job we're probably bidding on soon

> I bought a viewsonice 22" myself.
> Very satisfied.
>
> Thinking about buying another one when I have the cash

Definitely worth it-- but get the same model. I have two of the same
model side by side with 2 17" monitors mounted above it for less
important stuff-- the quad display works quite nicely.


-- 
Derek


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Screen mockup of job we're probably bidding on soon

[Derek Kalweit]

> I bought a viewsonice 22" myself.
> Very satisfied.
>
> Thinking about buying another one when I have the cash

Definitely worth it-- but get the same model. I have two of the same
model side by side with 2 17" monitors mounted above it for less
important stuff-- the quad display works quite nicely.


-- 
Derek


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: Screen mockup of job we're probably bidding on soon

[Virgil Bierschwale]

I bought a viewsonice 22" myself.
Very satisfied.

Thinking about buying another one when I have the cash

Virgil Bierschwale
http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com
http://www.jobsforourfuture.com/index.php

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Derek Kalweit
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 9:57 AM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: Screen mockup of job we're probably bidding on soon

> > I'd check the native resolutions on the LCD screens you might be
> > using-- just because they're big, doesn't mean they always have a high
> > resolution.

> What's a good minimum resolution?

LCDs have one ideal resolution, typically. Going below these makes it
look far worse usually. I'm not sure how big you're looking for, but I
use Viewsonic 22" widescreens myself, which I very much like. I
believe they run at 1650x1050 or something like that.


> > It may also be wide-screen dimensions which could buy you
> > more screen real estate if this is the only system it will be
> > displayed on.

> And that's the case here, too.  We could buy the screen that would be
> used by the client.

I would at least research which one, and potentially buy before you
build too much of the screen around it. Could save some refactoring
later(which means more time/$$$ for your client).


-- 
Derek


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Screen mockup of job we're probably bidding on soon

[Derek Kalweit]

> > I'd check the native resolutions on the LCD screens you might be
> > using-- just because they're big, doesn't mean they always have a high
> > resolution.

> What's a good minimum resolution?

LCDs have one ideal resolution, typically. Going below these makes it
look far worse usually. I'm not sure how big you're looking for, but I
use Viewsonic 22" widescreens myself, which I very much like. I
believe they run at 1650x1050 or something like that.


> > It may also be wide-screen dimensions which could buy you
> > more screen real estate if this is the only system it will be
> > displayed on.

> And that's the case here, too.  We could buy the screen that would be
> used by the client.

I would at least research which one, and potentially buy before you
build too much of the screen around it. Could save some refactoring
later(which means more time/$$$ for your client).


-- 
Derek


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Screen mockup of job we're probably bidding on soon

[MB Software Solutions]

Derek Kalweit wrote:
>> Client has given ok for res higher than 1024x768, as this might be on a
>> super duper sized LCD flat screen, so scrolling won't be considered.
>> 
>
> I'd check the native resolutions on the LCD screens you might be
> using-- just because they're big, doesn't mean they always have a high
> resolution. 
What's a good minimum resolution?

> It may also be wide-screen dimensions which could buy you
> more screen real estate if this is the only system it will be
> displayed on.
>   
And that's the case here, too.  We could buy the screen that would be 
used by the client.

-- 
Michael J. Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
http://fabmate.com
"Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!"



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

[OT] And ya'll want the government to protect us ??

[Virgil Bierschwale]

This is about as stupid as it gets in my opinion.

 

1. Use free Wi-Fi, go directly to jail

Note to WiFi users: Free is not free. If you tap into a free hot spot, you
could end up getting arrested. As I write
  about in my
most recent blog, that's what happened to a Michigan man, when he was
arrested for tapping into a free Wi-Fi hot spot from his car rather than
from the cafe that sponsors the hot spot.

Sam Peterson was arrested when he used the Union Street Cafe's hot spot by
parking his car nearby, rather than going inside and buying a drink.
According to the Web site ars Technica, he told a reporter, "I knew that the
Union Street had WiFi. I just went down and checked my e-mail and didn't see
a problem with that."

I don't see a problem with it, either. But the police did...and so does the
state of Michigan. Michigan's "Fraudulent access to computers, computer
systems, and computer networks" law apparently bans such actions, even
though the Union Street Cafe's network is freely available. You need to be
inside the cafe rather than outside, in order to use it.

This isn't the first time someone has been arrested for using free Wi-Fi. As
I wrote   about
in a previous blog, an Alaskan man was arrested for using the free WiFi
network of a public library after hours, while parked in his car.

These arrests are clearly ludicrous. The law needs to be clarified...and
free should mean free

 

Virgil Bierschwale

http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com

http://www.jobsforourfuture.com/index.php

 



--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: VB to VFP

[Ed Leafe]

On May 23, 2007, at 8:26 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> 
>
> Simple how to make a guid in VFP.  Simple did I say?
>
> Bad Steve!

Of course, it's a one-liner in Dabo, and you have your choice of  
random or machine/network-based UUIDs.

 >>> import dabo
 >>> print dabo.lib.getRandomUUID()
6c91f7b1-b7d8-418f-a8f5-0e050d079728
 >>> print dabo.lib.getRandomUUID()
af9574d5-d693-49a6-ba3f-cc9ddcbc6d09
 >>> print dabo.lib.getRandomUUID()
4e2ec67a-9e9e-40cf-bea4-bd940d6f36ac
 >>> print dabo.lib.getRandomUUID()
7b9b31de-e1dc-4ce4-ac0c-a469ee9ac1e6

 >>> print dabo.lib.getMachineUUID()
92528e84-093a-11dc-8390-0016cb8f65d2
 >>> print dabo.lib.getMachineUUID()
92e9f2c4-093a-11dc-8390-0016cb8f65d2
 >>> print dabo.lib.getMachineUUID()
93430d00-093a-11dc-8390-0016cb8f65d2
 >>> print dabo.lib.getMachineUUID()
939fd5b2-093a-11dc-8390-0016cb8f65d2


-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: FW: VB to VFP

[Jean Laeremans]

On 5/23/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>
> Simple how to make a guid in VFP.  Simple did I say?
>
> Bad Steve!

Does depend on your definition of 'simple' oc.

A+
jml



PROCEDURE CreateGUID

*** Author: Rick Strahl, West Wind Technologies
*** http://www.west-wind.com/
*** Modified: 01/26/98
*** Function: Creates a globally unique identifier using Win32
*** COM services. The value is guaranteed to be unique
*** Format: {9F47F480-9641-11D1-A3D0-00600889F23B}
*** Return: GUID as a string or "" if the function failed
*

DECLARE INTEGER CoCreateGuid IN Ole32.dll ;
 STRING @lcGUIDStruc

DECLARE INTEGER StringFromGUID2 IN Ole32.dll ;
 STRING cGUIDStruc, ;
 STRING @cGUID, ;
 LONG nSize

*** Simulate GUID strcuture with a string
lcStruc_GUID = REPLICATE(" ",16)
lcGUID = REPLICATE(" ",80)
lnSize = LEN(lcGUID) / 2
IF CoCreateGuid(@lcStruc_GUID) # 0
 RETURN ""
ENDIF

*** Now convert the structure to the GUID string
IF StringFromGUID2(lcStruc_GUID,@lcGuid,lnSize) = 0
 RETURN ""
ENDIF

RETURN SUBSTR(StrConv(LEFT(lcGUID,76),6),2,36)
* CreateGUID
* -


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: FW: VB to VFP

[Stephen . Russell]

Simple how to make a guid in VFP.  Simple did I say? 

Bad Steve!

Stephen Russell
AutoZone Contractor
Desk 901.495-7916
Cell  901.246-0159

Memphis TN




"Stephen the Cook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
05/23/2007 06:15 AM

To
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc

Subject
FW: VB to VFP






Sytze de Boer <> wrote:
> Thank you Stephen
> Here it is
> 
> 
> Option Compare Database
> Option Explicit
> 
> Private Type Guid
> Data1 As Long
> Data2 As Integer
> Data3 As Integer
> Data4(7) As Byte
> End Type
>


> 
> Private Declare Function CoCreateGuid Lib "OLE32.DLL" (pGuid As Guid)
> As Long 
> 
> Public Function GetGUID() As String
> 
> Dim udtGUID As Guid
> 
> If (CoCreateGuid(udtGUID) = 0) Then
> 
> GetGUID = _
> String(8 - Len(Hex$(udtGUID.Data1)), "0") & Hex$(udtGUID.Data1) & _
> String(4 - Len(Hex$(udtGUID.Data2)), "0") & Hex$(udtGUID.Data2) & _
> String(4 - Len(Hex$(udtGUID.Data3)), "0") & Hex$(udtGUID.Data3) & _
> IIf((udtGUID.Data4(0) < &H10), "0", "") & Hex$(udtGUID.Data4(0)) & _
> IIf((udtGUID.Data4(1) < &H10), "0", "") & Hex$(udtGUID.Data4(1)) & _
> IIf((udtGUID.Data4(2) < &H10), "0", "") & Hex$(udtGUID.Data4(2)) & _
> IIf((udtGUID.Data4(3) < &H10), "0", "") & Hex$(udtGUID.Data4(3)) & _
> IIf((udtGUID.Data4(4) < &H10), "0", "") & Hex$(udtGUID.Data4(4)) & _
> IIf((udtGUID.Data4(5) < &H10), "0", "") & Hex$(udtGUID.Data4(5)) & _
> IIf((udtGUID.Data4(6) < &H10), "0", "") & Hex$(udtGUID.Data4(6)) & _
> IIf((udtGUID.Data4(7) < &H10), "0", "") & Hex$(udtGUID.Data4(7)) End
> If 
> 
> End Function
> 
> 
> On 5/22/07, Stephen the Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Sytze de Boer <> wrote:
>>> Hi Folk
>>> I have about 15 lines in VB code that I need to convert into VFP(9)
>>> I tried a utility from Sweet Potato but it's not quite complete Can
>>> anyone help me ? (Gimme your email address and I can send the txt
>>> file)
>> 
>> Just put the code out here.
>> 
>> 
>> Stephen Russell
>> DBA / .Net Developer
>> 
>> Memphis TN 38115
>> 901.246-0159
>> 
>> "A good way to judge people is by observing how they treat those who
>> can do them absolutely no good." ---Unknown
>> 
>> http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/
>> 
>> No virus found in this outgoing message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.7.6/813 - Release Date:
>> 5/20/2007 7:54 AM
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Screen mockup of job we're probably bidding on soon

[Derek Kalweit]

> > 4.  I understand yer res is at 1280 x 1024 - but if it was smaller, would
> > things scroll? you make allowances for presence of scroll bars left and
> > bottom?

> Client has given ok for res higher than 1024x768, as this might be on a
> super duper sized LCD flat screen, so scrolling won't be considered.

I'd check the native resolutions on the LCD screens you might be
using-- just because they're big, doesn't mean they always have a high
resolution. It may also be wide-screen dimensions which could buy you
more screen real estate if this is the only system it will be
displayed on.


-- 
Derek


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] GWB: Al-Qaeda Fund Raiser

[Pete Theisen]

On Wednesday 23 May 2007 9:24 am, Bill Arnold wrote:
> > If the Dems ..
>
> If the lunatics weren't running the asylum ...

Hi Bill!

Now, now - seems I remember you spent a little time in the joint, glass houses 
and all that.
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [OT] GWB: Al-Qaeda Fund Raiser

[Bill Arnold]

> If the Dems ..

If the lunatics weren't running the asylum ...


Bill




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] GWB: Al-Qaeda Fund Raiser

[Helio W.]

So simple as that, huh?

On 5/23/07, Robert Calco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If the Dems had not engaged in this unbelievable propaganda war to
> demonize the President, we might have been able to crush the
> terrorists in Iraq and given Iran all the incentive it needed to "do
> the right thing". Instead, having gotten their precious power back,
> the Dems have "lead" us to the point now that Iran is feeling its
> oats and openly supporting the terrorists, and everyone is ducking
> for cover.
>
> - Bob


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

[OT] Odd arms build-up for China-Taiwan shoot out?

[Pete Theisen]

Hi Everybody!

China and Taiwan have been posturing in each other's direction for longer than 
most people have been alive. However, there are always those who would like 
to bring things to a head.

I have been scouring the gun shops for .30-06 ammunition for my 65 year old 
U.S. Rifle Caliber .30, M 1 Garand for a LONG time. No one had any of that 
particular round. One old shop owner offered the explanation that all the 
production of .30-06 is being sent to China and/or Taiwan in preparation for 
the big battle over Taiwan's Independence. The 101 year old .30-06?

Does anyone know if this is in fact happening? If so, why not something more 
modern like 7.62, 5.8, or 5.56 to fit the weapons they supposedly have? Sure, 
they could take .30-06 rounds apart and re-manufacture the powder and 
material into rounds to fit modern military weapons, but why?

Oh, yeah. I finally found a box of .30-06 last night. Wal-mart of all places.
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] GWB: Al-Qaeda Fund Raiser

[Pete Theisen]

On Wednesday 23 May 2007 7:06 am, Robert Calco wrote:

> If the Dems had not engaged in this unbelievable propaganda war to
> demonize the President

Hi Bob!

The Ds use treason as electoral politics fairly often, what is unbelievable is 
that people still believe them. Short memories or no training in history for 
the younger ones, I guess.
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] Holy Crap! :Lebanon vs Palestine ?

[Pete Theisen]

On Tuesday 22 May 2007 11:43 pm, William Sanders / EFG wrote:
> Some radical Palestinian dudes break into a Syrian bank, steal all the
> money and gold, high-tail it into the Refugee camp, claim asylum.
>
> The Syrians follow them, start shooting, miss the radial Palestinian dudes
> mostly, kill a lot of innocent bystanders in the refugee camp.
>
> No reparations were made after the first basic negotiations, the radical
> Palestinian dudes were not handed over, the stolen money buys weapons, and
> the fighting ensues.

Hi Bill!

All Arabs consider the Ps 2nd class sub-humans, at best, and look at them at 
their own convenience. Slaves, human shields, live target practice, whores - 
everything traditional that comes the way of underclasses everywhere. It is 
worse in the middle east where prejudices are all but official.

The American Ds will be ecstatic. "See, see??? We told you this would happen 
right after we all voted for the invasion"
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] GWB: Al-Qaeda Fund Raiser

[Robert Calco]

Speaking of enemy activity:

The Dems are caving on the troop withdrawal provision:

http://tinyurl.com/2dqbjr

Maybe it has something to do with the fact that their strategy has  
encouraged Iran and their Al Qaeda friends to use this summer's pre- 
Patraeus report period to ramp up their proxy war against us (duh):

http://www.guardian.co.uk/frontpage/story/0,,2085195,00.html

Meanwhile of course Bush is caving too, planning to hand Iraq over to  
the UN:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,2085981,00.html

It's certainly the smart thing to do politically---since the Dems  
have been whining about how (for some inexplicable reason) only the  
UN can solve the problem, let them adopt it and watch what happens  
(poor Iraq)---but this whole thing is sad to watch because of the  
manner in which political expediency has gotten the upper hand over  
common sense and principle on all sides of the ostensible 'debate'.

If the Dems had not engaged in this unbelievable propaganda war to  
demonize the President, we might have been able to crush the  
terrorists in Iraq and given Iran all the incentive it needed to "do  
the right thing". Instead, having gotten their precious power back,  
the Dems have "lead" us to the point now that Iran is feeling its  
oats and openly supporting the terrorists, and everyone is ducking  
for cover.

If something is falling yet, it will be soon. Sadly, we have assumed  
that position.

- Bob

On May 22, 2007, at 10:50 PM, Pete Theisen wrote:

> On Tuesday 22 May 2007 8:49 pm, Ed Leafe wrote:
>> http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/washingtondc/la-na-
>> binladen20may20,1,3996913.story
>> ( -or- http://tinyurl.com/ysm8ep )
>>
>> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>> U.S. officials say the terrorist network's command base is
>> increasingly being funded by cash coming out of Iraq.
>> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>> In one of the most troubling trends, U.S. officials said that Al
>> Qaeda's command base in Pakistan is increasingly being funded by cash
>> coming out of Iraq, where the terrorist network's operatives are
>> raising substantial sums from donations to the anti-American
>> insurgency as well as kidnappings of wealthy Iraqis and other
>> criminal activity.
>> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>
>>  Well done, all you Iraqi war supporters!
>
> Hi Ed!
>
> What does anyone expect, a war without enemy activity? Well done  
> all you US
> traitors!
> -- 
> Regards,
>
> Pete
> http://www.pete-theisen.com/
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [NF] Lightweight Task Manager

[Andy Davies]

Dave,
I tried something like that *years* ago when I first had a play with C#
(.net v1) - the little grey cells aren't what they were but I'm pretty sure
I just set object properties and let the calling app retrieve them.

AndyD   8-)#




 
  "Dave Crozier"
 
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   
  o.uk>cc:  
 
  Sent by: Subject:  RE: [NF] Lightweight 
Task Manager   
  profoxtech-bounce 
 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   

 

 
  23/05/2007 11:34  
 
  Please respond to 
 
  profox
 

 



Andy,
The problem is passing an array reference back from a .net component
wrapped
up into a dll for Paul's icalendar "activex". Nothing to do with VFP or the
Organizer and I can't just get my head around the best way to do it.

Bloody .NET and C#!

Dave Crozier

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Andy Davies
Sent: 23 May 2007 09:46
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: RE: [NF] Lightweight Task Manager

Dave Crozier said "the problem is passing array references"

I assume it's all local - so can't you pass an object ref instead?

Andrew Davies  MBCS CITP
  - AndyD    8-)#



**








**

Manchester City Council supports Smokefree England - 1 July 2007


This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you have received this email in error please notify the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by 
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with any queries.

**



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [NF] Lightweight Task Manager

[Dave Crozier]

Andy,
The problem is passing an array reference back from a .net component wrapped
up into a dll for Paul's icalendar "activex". Nothing to do with VFP or the
Organizer and I can't just get my head around the best way to do it. 

Bloody .NET and C#!

Dave Crozier

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Andy Davies
Sent: 23 May 2007 09:46
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: RE: [NF] Lightweight Task Manager

Dave Crozier said "the problem is passing array references"

I assume it's all local - so can't you pass an object ref instead?

Andrew Davies  MBCS CITP
  - AndyD    8-)#



**

Manchester City Council supports Smokefree England - 1 July 2007


This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with any queries.

**



[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [NF] Lightweight Task Manager

[Andy Davies]

Dave Crozier said "the problem is passing array references"

I assume it's all local - so can't you pass an object ref instead?

Andrew Davies  MBCS CITP
  - AndyD    8-)#



**

Manchester City Council supports Smokefree England - 1 July 2007


This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you have received this email in error please notify the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by 
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with any queries.

**



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

[NF] Interesting freeware drive imager.

[Alan Bourke]

http://www.runtime.org/dixml.htm

Stores drive images in XML format, which can also be restored from
BartPE boot CDs.

-- 
  Alan Bourke
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [NF] Lightweight Task Manager

[Dave Crozier]

Paul,
Correct! And it's doing my head in...so close but so far but I'll crack
it this week and maybe have something you can use - the problem is passing
array references which doeesn't seem to work so I may resort to simple XML
strings.

Anyhow what do you guys want me to do? I have some additions to the calendar
from the one posted on my website - mainly bug fixes and work-arounds along
with calendar printing generally to make it easier to use but haven't added
alarms as of yet or any other of the modules. The delay is purely due to the
fact that everyone here is happy with the product as it is currently so no
rush for the other features even though I'd like to push it on some more,
finishing off the alarms and adding tasks would be a good start and could
probably be done with a couple of days work.

How about me uploading the latest source and then someone else can pick it
up and run with it eh, OR do you all want a finished product you can pick up
and use (lazy buggers!)?

If enough people are interested (I know Sytze is because of his
complimentary email some time ago - thanks) I'll push it on.

Dave Crozier




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 May 2007 21:01
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] Lightweight Task Manager

Dave can't come out to play today - he's busy (or should be) working on
porting the .Net iCalendar library to VFP 

- Original Message -
From: "Alan Bourke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 May 2007 20:57:22 o'clock (GMT) Europe/London
Subject: Re: [NF] Lightweight Task Manager

Paging Mr Crozier, Mr Crozier to the list please ...


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.