Re: [OT] Eggplant "Steaks"

[Jean Laeremans]

On 8/7/07, kam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You need an adverb there. I suggest 'surely' instead of 'sure'

It was just a lame effort of mine to write colonial English...

A+
jml


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

[NF] Get your MacOS 7 nostalgia fix here ...

[Alan Bourke]

http://myoldmac.net/webse-e-flash.htm


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] Eggplant "Steaks"

[Pete Theisen]

On Tuesday 07 August 2007 02:49, Jean Laeremans wrote:
> On 8/7/07, kam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You need an adverb there. I suggest 'surely' instead of 'sure'
>
> It was just a lame effort of mine to write colonial English...

Hi Jean!

Your usage is more often seen than his. I would say that there is not one in a 
hundred who know how to say it correctly, and he is that one.
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] Eggplant "Steaks"

[Jean Laeremans]

On 8/7/07, Pete Theisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 August 2007 02:49, Jean Laeremans wrote:
> > On 8/7/07, kam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > You need an adverb there. I suggest 'surely' instead of 'sure'
> >
> > It was just a lame effort of mine to write colonial English...
>
> Hi Jean!
>
> Your usage is more often seen than his. I would say that there is not one in a
> hundred who know how to say it correctly, and he is that one.
> --
> Regards,
>
> Pete
> http://www.pete-theisen.com/

Well, he's right. Funny thing is i did it on purpose ...fortunately my
old (Oxford) English teacher isn't among(st) the living anymore.

A+
jml


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Vi$ta: Install Home Basic from Ultimate Upgrade CD

[Man-wai Chang]

> Just pay $3 and get your unlimited versions (courtesy Mr. Gates deal 
> with China).

Enlighten me on how to get it. :)

-- 
  @~@http://changmw.homeip.net
 / v \   May the Force and Farce be with you! Linux 2.6.22.1
/( _ )\  (Xubuntu 7.04)  18:06:01 up 4 days 7:58
  ^ ^1 user load average: 0.04 0.04 0.00
news://news.3home.net news://news.hkpcug.org news://news.newsgroup.com.hk


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Thoughtful Post on Windows Vista]

[Man-wai Chang]

> I used firefox from early days. It was good but I had problems on some
> sites, especially https sites for some reason. However apart from that

I think you were possibly talking about Firefox-1.5. Try 2.0.0.6.

-- 
  @~@http://changmw.homeip.net
 / v \   May the Force and Farce be with you! Linux 2.6.22.1
/( _ )\  (Xubuntu 7.04)  18:07:01 up 4 days 7:59
  ^ ^1 user load average: 0.14 0.06 0.01
news://news.3home.net news://news.hkpcug.org news://news.newsgroup.com.hk


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: VFP9: Printing: Selecting a Different Paper Tray

[Peter Cushing]

Desmond Lloyd wrote:
> Good Afternoon,
>  
> Need some printing advice:
>  
> We have an application in which we will need to print to a specific printer 
> using a different paper tray (other than the default).  
> Can set the printer (no brainer)
> Next step is to change the paper tray,  I can do that by issuing sys(1037),  
> but once changed it stays that way meaning that I would have to reissue the 
> sys(1037) after printing to the "special tray".
>  
> Any advice on how I might programatically change the paper tray and the 
> change back?
>   
Set up a dummy table and report and try printing to this printer using 
sys(1037) before the print.  Print to one tray, then open the .frx file 
and have a look in the EXPR memo to see if it has a line referencing the 
tray, then try another tray and have a look in here again.  If you have 
two different lines then these can be written back to the .frx before 
doing a print and you could have a control on a screen to select the output.

HTH

Peter



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Optimizations?

[Mike yearwood]

Hi Michael

> Got this line of code that looks up data in a local view:
>
>LOCATE FOR cRecType = tcRecType AND iKey = tiKey AND nJobID =
>this.nJobID
>
>
> I've got separate indexes (temporary ones since it's a local view!) on
> cRecType, iKey, and nJobID
>
> My understanding is that Rushmore will notice these indexes and use
> them.  Would it be better to create a compound index and simply do a
> SEEK instead?  I'm gonna try that now but thought I'd get some Fox
> discussion going here.  

I wrote an article about this exact scenario long ago.
http://advisor.com/doc/01468

Rushmore will have to examine and use 3 index tags and build 3 bitmaps
and - if my suspicions are right - a 4th to AND the first 3 to do
that.

SEEK will use a single index tag and will not build a bitmap. SEEK
does a much simpler and faster process than LOCATE, and since it's in
a view (with 600+ records?!>!) it will be fast. You may find another
speed boost because you only have to build 1 index, not 3.

Under 50 records, depending on the CPU, there is little difference
between the two commands.

The THIS.nJobID is different. Check speed of using a memvar against a
property. There's a difference, especially if you add access and
assigns to that property. Nothing you do with indexes will speed up
using the property. I NEVER use property references in any rushmore
commands.

Mike Yearwood


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: Optimizations?

[Stephen the Cook]

MB Software Solutions <> wrote:
> Ed Leafe wrote:
>> 
>>  First off, this is a view, which means that you shouldn't have a ton
>> of records. My guess is that a LOCATE even without indexes will be
>> plenty fast. 
>> 
>>  Are you seeing delays that are causing you to pursue this?
>> 
>> 
> 
> Not exactly delays, but just tons of iterations.  There are 600+
> records that go through this routine (which thankfully isn't called
> too often).  
> I used Markus Egger's Coverage Profiler add-in tool to show me what
> code is slow and running lots of times.  This was brought about by a
> significant delay in the start of a process.  
> 
> Unfortunately, I think this is just the way it has to be for this
> situation's particulars (without going into client detail). 
> 
> Ever get times where you think you're writing butt ugly code and
> should just stop for the night?   

Can you bring the data into your view in a presorted way instead?

Stephen Russell
DBA / .Net Developer

Memphis TN 38115
901.246-0159

"A good way to judge people is by observing how they treat those who
can do them absolutely no good." ---Unknown

http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.8/940 - Release Date: 8/6/2007
4:53 PM
 



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Barebones deal

[Man-wai Chang]

> I will 3rd that.  Okay for cheap machines for surfing the web, but do not
> expect any great graphics.

I have had some problems with VIA's ALU680 sound chip under Win2K.
Anyway, it's the old chip. :)

-- 
  @~@http://changmw.homeip.net
 / v \   May the Force and Farce be with you! Linux 2.6.22.1
/( _ )\  (Xubuntu 7.04)  19:45:01 up 4 days 9:37
  ^ ^1 user load average: 0.00 0.00 0.00
news://news.3home.net news://news.hkpcug.org news://news.newsgroup.com.hk


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [NF] Advisor Guide Online Access

[Pablo H. Rivera Sr.]

Thanks.

PabloSr
===

* -Original Message-
* From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:profoxtech-
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Crozier
* Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 1:54 AM
* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subject: RE: [NF] Advisor Guide Online Access
*
* Pablu,
* It usually takes about 24 hours.
*
* Dave Crozier
*
* -Original Message-
* From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
* Behalf
* Of Pablo H. Rivera Sr.
* Sent: 07 August 2007 04:30
* To: profox@leafe.com
* Subject: [NF] Advisor Guide Online Access
*
* Is anybody in the know about this?
*
* I just received the July issue of MS Visual Foxpro Advisor Guide.  Does
* anyone here know how long does it take to get the username and password
* to
* access the online goodies? TIA!
*
* PabloSr
* ===




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Bloggers consider forming labor union

[Man-wai Chang]

> Perhaps we Foxers could do this too.  We could call it the VFP 
> Developers Association, or VFPDA.  

Global or US-only?  :P

-- 
  @~@http://changmw.homeip.net
 / v \   May the Force and Farce be with you! Linux 2.6.22.1
/( _ )\  (Xubuntu 7.04)  21:32:01 up 4 days 11:24
  ^ ^1 user load average: 0.03 0.02 0.00
news://news.3home.net news://news.hkpcug.org news://news.newsgroup.com.hk


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Gotta love Microsoft.

[Adam Buckland]

Trying to trace a memory leak.  From
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/268343


"If you think that you are experiencing a memory leak, be aware that
memory leaks may not be what they appear to be. You may discover that a
memory leak is not a true memory leak, but is a performance
enhancement."



Adam.


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Beware - Virus that attacks DBF's

[Dave Crozier]

To all,
Make sure that your customer's shields are up just in case the virus makes
it over from the far east.

"...The W32.Ukuran.Worm, which is running wild currently in Vietnam, attacks
FoxPro data files by truncating them and replacing them with spam data,..."

http://blog.todmeansfox.com/2007/08/06/w32ukuranworm-attacks-foxpro-dbfs/

or 

http://tinyurl.com/2a3pm8


Dave Crozier


Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.14/912 - Release Date: 22/07/2007
19:02
 




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: Beware - Virus that attacks DBF's

[mrgmhale]

Damn and Double Damn!  There goes the great performance we all love to see
over a network.  Bastards!

Gil

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Crozier
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 10:12 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Beware - Virus that attacks DBF's
>
>
> To all,
> Make sure that your customer's shields are up just in case the virus makes
> it over from the far east.
>
> "...The W32.Ukuran.Worm, which is running wild currently in
> Vietnam, attacks
> FoxPro data files by truncating them and replacing them with spam
> data,..."
>
> http://blog.todmeansfox.com/2007/08/06/w32ukuranworm-attacks-foxpro-dbfs/
>
> or
>
> http://tinyurl.com/2a3pm8
>
>
> Dave Crozier
>
>
> Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.14/912 - Release Date:
> 22/07/2007
> 19:02
>
>
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Beware - Virus that attacks DBF's

[Peter Cushing]

Dave Crozier wrote:
> To all,
> Make sure that your customer's shields are up just in case the virus makes
> it over from the far east.
>
> "...The W32.Ukuran.Worm, which is running wild currently in Vietnam, attacks
> FoxPro data files by truncating them and replacing them with spam data,..."
>
> http://blog.todmeansfox.com/2007/08/06/w32ukuranworm-attacks-foxpro-dbfs/
>
> or 
>
> http://tinyurl.com/2a3pm8
>
>   
The article is talking about mid July when they were destroyed so 
hopefully your virus guards will cover these threats.


Still, can't be too careful.

Peter



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: VFP9-Icon

[henry.dagher]

Assuming the forms are based on a class, you add the button once in that class.

What do you mean by fpw method?

Henry

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sytze de Boer
Sent: 2007-08-05 3:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: VFP9-Icon


Hi foxers

I have a reasonably old application in VFP6 which the client has asked
me to update.
Amongst other things, I want to now ADD an icon to all the FORMS.
Is it necessary to modify every form to do this or can I specify this
in the FPW (or some other method)

Sytze


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: VFP9-Icon

[Grigore Dolghin]

He meant config.fpw. Nope, it doesn't work that way.
- Original Message - 
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 5:29 PM
Subject: RE: VFP9-Icon


> Assuming the forms are based on a class, you add the button once in that 
> class.
>
> What do you mean by fpw method?
>
> Henry
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> On Behalf Of Sytze de Boer
> Sent: 2007-08-05 3:28 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: VFP9-Icon
>
>
> Hi foxers
>
> I have a reasonably old application in VFP6 which the client has asked
> me to update.
> Amongst other things, I want to now ADD an icon to all the FORMS.
> Is it necessary to modify every form to do this or can I specify this
> in the FPW (or some other method)
>
> Sytze
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: VFP9-Icon

[Alan Bourke]

> What do you mean by fpw method?

CONFIG.FPW presumably.
-- 
  Alan Bourke
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

[NF] Any Linux gurus here?

[Wolfe, Stephen S YA-02 6 MDSS/SGSI]

This is low level stuff for most of you, but I seem to be stuck.

I have a script that I run on a RedHat box that makes some network
changes.  I want to call that script during subsequent reboots, to allow
the changes to span reboots.

This seems like a perfect time for a soft link to the script.

So I go to rc3.d, add my S89network --> /home/user/script  link.

Problem is, it doesn't execute.  The script requires a 'start' parameter
if called from a shell, but I thought any link starting with 'S' would
pass that to the script when called...yes/no?

If not, how should I be going about calling this script (late in the
startup process)

I looked in dmesg, but all that's in there is some kernel level stuff.

v/r
 

//SIGNED//

Stephen S. Wolfe, YA2, DAF
6th MDG Data Services Manager
6th MDG Information System Security Officer
Comm (813) 827-9994  DSN 651-9994



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

[NF] internet explorer

[Al]

I think I have spotted a nice bug in IE
>From an outlook link to download an exe, it opens and asks to save while
going away. Cancel the download and it GPF's in VFP6 style :)
Allen

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.8/940 - Release Date: 06/08/2007
16:53
 



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Any Linux gurus here?

[Dave Thayer]

On 8/7/07, Wolfe, Stephen S YA-02 6 MDSS/SGSI
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If not, how should I be going about calling this script (late in the
> startup process)
>

Cron will run a script on bootup if you use the @reboot time
specifier.  This can be a lot simpler than monkeying around with
initscripts as long as cron starts at an appropriate time for your
script.

man 5 crontab for details (Don't forget the '5', man crontab tells you
about the crontab program, man 5 crontab tells you about the file
structure.)

HTH

dt
-- 
Dave Thayer
Denver, CO


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: THIS can only be used within a method

[Vince Teachout]

MB Software Solutions wrote:
> I get this stupid freakin ahole error when doing a 
> TABLEUPDATE(2,.T.,"vCosts").
>
> G!!!WTF?!?!?
>   
Usually it's not complaining about the Tableupdate, it's complaining 
about "This."  Did you perchance cut/paste some code from within a 
method to outside of a method?  That's when I usually get it.

this.foo = 'Bar'  && OK within method, error when I cut and paste and 
run in a prg.  HTH.


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] internet explorer

[Whil Hentzen (Pro*)]

Al wrote:
> I think I have spotted a nice bug in IE

Singular?

Whil


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [NF] internet explorer

[Allen]

Hehe, ok point taken
Allen 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Whil Hentzen (Pro*)
Sent: 07 August 2007 19:26
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [NF] internet explorer

Al wrote:
> I think I have spotted a nice bug in IE

Singular?

Whil


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.8/940 - Release Date: 06/08/2007
16:53
 



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [NF] Any Linux gurus here?

[Wolfe, Stephen S YA-02 6 MDSS/SGSI]

Thanks!

v/r
 

//SIGNED//

Stephen S. Wolfe, YA2, DAF
6th MDG Data Services Manager
6th MDG Information System Security Officer
Comm (813) 827-9994  DSN 651-9994
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave Thayer
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 1:09 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [NF] Any Linux gurus here?

On 8/7/07, Wolfe, Stephen S YA-02 6 MDSS/SGSI
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If not, how should I be going about calling this script (late in the
> startup process)
>

Cron will run a script on bootup if you use the @reboot time
specifier.  This can be a lot simpler than monkeying around with
initscripts as long as cron starts at an appropriate time for your
script.

man 5 crontab for details (Don't forget the '5', man crontab tells you
about the crontab program, man 5 crontab tells you about the file
structure.)

HTH

dt
-- 
Dave Thayer
Denver, CO


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Beware - Virus that attacks DBF's

[MB Software Solutions]

Peter Cushing wrote:
> Dave Crozier wrote:
>   
>> To all,
>> Make sure that your customer's shields are up just in case the virus makes
>> it over from the far east.
>>
>> "...The W32.Ukuran.Worm, which is running wild currently in Vietnam, attacks
>> FoxPro data files by truncating them and replacing them with spam data,..."
>>
>> http://blog.todmeansfox.com/2007/08/06/w32ukuranworm-attacks-foxpro-dbfs/
>>
>> or 
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/2a3pm8
>>
>>   
>> 
> The article is talking about mid July when they were destroyed so 
> hopefully your virus guards will cover these threats.
>
>
> Still, can't be too careful.
>
> Peter
>
>
>   

Would using Database Events (in VFP8/9) prevent this from happening, 
assuming you utilized the dbcBeforeOpenTable event to prevent access if 
a special object/variable/property didn't exist?

-- 
Michael J. Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
http://fabmate.com
"Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!"



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: Beware - Virus that attacks DBF's

[Dave Crozier]

Michael,
Not really, I guess that the virus is simply embedded in an .exe, email or
similar and simply looks for anything with a .DBF file extension which it
would then open as a file and rewrite the crap back to the disk.

Effectively there is nothing that you could do in VFP apart from maybe
keeping the file open to deter exclusive access.

Dave Crozier

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of MB Software Solutions
Sent: 07 August 2007 19:47
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Beware - Virus that attacks DBF's

Peter Cushing wrote:
> Dave Crozier wrote:
>   
>> To all,
>> Make sure that your customer's shields are up just in case the virus
makes
>> it over from the far east.
>>
>> "...The W32.Ukuran.Worm, which is running wild currently in Vietnam,
attacks
>> FoxPro data files by truncating them and replacing them with spam
data,..."
>>
>> http://blog.todmeansfox.com/2007/08/06/w32ukuranworm-attacks-foxpro-dbfs/
>>
>> or 
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/2a3pm8
>>
>>   
>> 
> The article is talking about mid July when they were destroyed so 
> hopefully your virus guards will cover these threats.
>
>
> Still, can't be too careful.
>
> Peter
>
>
>   

Would using Database Events (in VFP8/9) prevent this from happening, 
assuming you utilized the dbcBeforeOpenTable event to prevent access if 
a special object/variable/property didn't exist?

-- 
Michael J. Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
http://fabmate.com
"Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!"



[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Beware - Virus that attacks DBF's

[MB Software Solutions]

Dave Crozier wrote:
> Michael,
> Not really, I guess that the virus is simply embedded in an .exe, email or
> similar and simply looks for anything with a .DBF file extension which it
> would then open as a file and rewrite the crap back to the disk.
>
> Effectively there is nothing that you could do in VFP apart from maybe
> keeping the file open to deter exclusive access.
>
>   
Well that's certainly another reason to avoid DBF files!  lol!


-- 
Michael J. Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
http://fabmate.com
"Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!"



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Beware - Virus that attacks DBF's

[Ed Leafe]

On Aug 7, 2007, at 3:07 PM, MB Software Solutions wrote:

>> Effectively there is nothing that you could do in VFP apart from  
>> maybe
>> keeping the file open to deter exclusive access.
>>
> Well that's certainly another reason to avoid DBF files!  lol!

Well, if you follow that logic, you should be avoiding Windows in  
general!

-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Beware - Virus that attacks DBF's

[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

At 03:07 PM 8/7/2007 -0400, MB Software Solutions wrote:
>Dave Crozier wrote:
> > Michael,
> > Not really, I guess that the virus is simply embedded in an .exe, email or
> > similar and simply looks for anything with a .DBF file extension which it
> > would then open as a file and rewrite the crap back to the disk.>
...
> >
>Well that's certainly another reason to avoid DBF files!  lol!

I didn't read the whole thing completely, but this doesn't sound like a 
hack against VFP. It's simply a virus that targets a specific type of file. 
(hmm... I wonder if it could be traced back to MS - they certainly have a 
lot to lose by folks continuing to use DBFs...)

Anyway, a comparison would be a virus that looks for all files with a .doc 
extension and replaces part of it with crap. It's not MS Word that has the 
vulnerability (for a change). So you wouldn't stop using Word or .doc files.

-Charlie





___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: Beware - Virus that attacks DBF's

[Bill Arnold]

I never get a clear picture of how these buggabos get control/launched
on our machines in the first place. If it's an e-mail attachment, AFAIK
Outlook doesn't even let it into the inbox, and if it did, spambeyes
would probably put it into a junk folder which is mass-deleted after a
quick scan - at least that's how I do it. So, where/how is something
like this getting control?


Bill



> To all,
> Make sure that your customer's shields are up just in case 
> the virus makes it over from the far east.
> 
> "...The W32.Ukuran.Worm, which is running wild currently in 
> Vietnam, attacks FoxPro data files by truncating them and 
> replacing them with spam data,..."
> 
http://blog.todmeansfox.com/2007/08/06/w32ukuranworm-attacks-foxpro-dbfs
/

or 

http://tinyurl.com/2a3pm8


Dave Crozier


Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.14/912 - Release Date:
22/07/2007 19:02
 




[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Beware - Virus that attacks DBF's

[Whil Hentzen (Pro*)]

Ed Leafe wrote:
> On Aug 7, 2007, at 3:07 PM, MB Software Solutions wrote:
> 
>>> Effectively there is nothing that you could do in VFP apart from  
>>> maybe
>>> keeping the file open to deter exclusive access.
>>>
>> Well that's certainly another reason to avoid DBF files!  lol!
> 
>   Well, if you follow that logic, you should be avoiding Windows in  
> general!

And kissing girls, too.

Whil


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: Beware - Virus that attacks DBF's

[Dave Crozier]

Just don’t kiss girls whilst standing in front of windows then! ;-)

Dave Crozier

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Whil Hentzen (Pro*)
Sent: 07 August 2007 20:59
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Beware - Virus that attacks DBF's

Ed Leafe wrote:
> On Aug 7, 2007, at 3:07 PM, MB Software Solutions wrote:
> 
>>> Effectively there is nothing that you could do in VFP apart from  
>>> maybe
>>> keeping the file open to deter exclusive access.
>>>
>> Well that's certainly another reason to avoid DBF files!  lol!
> 
>   Well, if you follow that logic, you should be avoiding Windows in  
> general!

And kissing girls, too.

Whil


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: VFP9: Printing: Selecting a Different Paper Tray

[Chet Gardiner]

I had to do something like this too.

I ended up having to

Run the report in the IDE to one paper tray.  Save off the expr memo 
field contents.

Run in the IDE to the other tray.  Save off the expr memo field contents 
again.

Then when I ran the report I had to open the .frx file - plug tray 1 
into the EXPR field, change to that printer in set printer to
Then do it again for the other printer tray.

The deal is just setting printer to is not enough -- the destination 
gets screwed up unless the same destination is also in the .frx file too...

I could dig out the code if you really need it -- it's on another computer.

Chet


Peter Cushing wrote:
> Desmond Lloyd wrote:
>   
>> Good Afternoon,
>>  
>> Need some printing advice:
>>  
>> We have an application in which we will need to print to a specific printer 
>> using a different paper tray (other than the default).  
>> Can set the printer (no brainer)
>> Next step is to change the paper tray,  I can do that by issuing sys(1037),  
>> but once changed it stays that way meaning that I would have to reissue the 
>> sys(1037) after printing to the "special tray".
>>  
>> Any advice on how I might programatically change the paper tray and the 
>> change back?
>>   
>> 
> Set up a dummy table and report and try printing to this printer using 
> sys(1037) before the print.  Print to one tray, then open the .frx file 
> and have a look in the EXPR memo to see if it has a line referencing the 
> tray, then try another tray and have a look in here again.  If you have 
> two different lines then these can be written back to the .frx before 
> doing a print and you could have a control on a screen to select the output.
>
> HTH
>
> Peter
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Bloggers consider forming labor union

[Chet Gardiner]

There already is one:

www.iww.org

I'm already a member...

http://www.iww.org/unions/dept500/iu560/



MB Software Solutions wrote:
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070806/ap_on_hi_te/unionized_bloggers
>
> Perhaps we Foxers could do this too.  We could call it the VFP 
> Developers Association, or VFPDA.  
>
>   


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] internet explorer

[Chet Gardiner]

You mean you found a bug in a worm???

Al wrote:
> I think I have spotted a nice bug in IE
> >From an outlook link to download an exe, it opens and asks to save while
> going away. Cancel the download and it GPF's in VFP6 style :)
> Allen
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
> Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.8/940 - Release Date: 06/08/2007
> 16:53
>  
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [NF] Bloggers consider forming labor union

[Allen]

There is a world of difference between an association and a union.
Allen

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chet Gardiner
Sent: 07 August 2007 22:12
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [NF] Bloggers consider forming labor union

There already is one:

www.iww.org

I'm already a member...

http://www.iww.org/unions/dept500/iu560/



MB Software Solutions wrote:
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070806/ap_on_hi_te/unionized_bloggers
>
> Perhaps we Foxers could do this too.  We could call it the VFP 
> Developers Association, or VFPDA.  
>
>   

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.8/940 - Release Date: 06/08/2007
16:53
 



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [NF] internet explorer

[Allen]

Windows is a worm now ? Or just ie
Allen 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chet Gardiner

You mean you found a bug in a worm???


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.8/940 - Release Date: 06/08/2007
16:53
 



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] internet explorer

[Chet Gardiner]

Both

Allen wrote:
> Windows is a worm now ? Or just ie
> Allen 
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Chet Gardiner
>
> You mean you found a bug in a worm???
>
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
> Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.8/940 - Release Date: 06/08/2007
> 16:53
>  
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Bloggers consider forming labor union

[Chet Gardiner]

A union with any real power is impossible in the U.S. of freakin' A

Here's why:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taft-Hartley_Actand
http://www.democrats.org/   and 
http://www.rnc.org/


Allen wrote:
> There is a world of difference between an association and a union.
> Allen
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Chet Gardiner
> Sent: 07 August 2007 22:12
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [NF] Bloggers consider forming labor union
>
> There already is one:
>
> www.iww.org
>
> I'm already a member...
>
> http://www.iww.org/unions/dept500/iu560/
>
>
>
> MB Software Solutions wrote:
>   
>> http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070806/ap_on_hi_te/unionized_bloggers
>>
>> Perhaps we Foxers could do this too.  We could call it the VFP 
>> Developers Association, or VFPDA.  
>>
>>   
>> 
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
> Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.8/940 - Release Date: 06/08/2007
> 16:53
>  
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [OT] And the saga continues ...

[Kristyne McDaniel]

John,

> Some people pay thousands of dollars for just that! God 
> listens and answers your prayers too, doesn't He?

Yes, and so far we've been hanging in there. Sometimes the answer is NO, but
we do get an answer.

There is always a level of risk when you build a house via construction
financing and you don't have a bug $$$ cushion somewhere for shortfalls. We
didn't know our risk was this large, but there is a risk nonetheless.

Kristyne




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Any Linux gurus here?

[Leland F. Jackson, CPA]

You can call your script from /etc/rc.d/rc.local file, which is comment 
as follows:

#
#!/bin/sh
#
# This script will be executed *after* all the other init scripts.
# You can put your own initialization stuff in here if you don't
# want to do the full Sys V style init stuff.

#---

Regards,

LelandJ



Wolfe, Stephen S YA-02 6 MDSS/SGSI wrote:
> This is low level stuff for most of you, but I seem to be stuck.
>
> I have a script that I run on a RedHat box that makes some network
> changes.  I want to call that script during subsequent reboots, to allow
> the changes to span reboots.
>
> This seems like a perfect time for a soft link to the script.
>
> So I go to rc3.d, add my S89network --> /home/user/script  link.
>
> Problem is, it doesn't execute.  The script requires a 'start' parameter
> if called from a shell, but I thought any link starting with 'S' would
> pass that to the script when called...yes/no?
>
> If not, how should I be going about calling this script (late in the
> startup process)
>
> I looked in dmesg, but all that's in there is some kernel level stuff.
>
> v/r
>  
>
> //SIGNED//
>
> Stephen S. Wolfe, YA2, DAF
> 6th MDG Data Services Manager
> 6th MDG Information System Security Officer
> Comm (813) 827-9994  DSN 651-9994
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

[NF] Some people have too much time on their hands

[David Crooks]

http://www.nouptime.com/

David L. Crooks



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Unusual use of Fox

[Garrett Fitzgerald]

I'm kind of embarassed to admit to this, but...

I'm trying to convert a lot of fields in Visual Form Editor (works
with GE's Electronic Medical Record) from the format

[
{CFMT(, "", , "B", " ")}]

to

[fnFormatService(, )]

Unfortunately, VFE doesn't support search-and-replace within the .DLG
file. (I could do it with the generated clinical kit files, but my
changes would be wiped out each time I saved.)

So, I opened up VFP and assigned the following to an fkey:

SET LIBRARY TO HOME()+"regexp.fll" ;
, HOME()+"foxtools.fll"

lcVal = _CLIPTEXT
IF LEFT(lcVal,2) = CHR(13)
lcVal = SUBSTR(lcVal, 2)
ENDIF

lcRegExp = '.*\{CFMT\((OBSNOW\("[^"]+"\)), "", ("[^"]*"),.*'

_cliptext = STRTRAN( ;
reduce( ;
regexp(lcVal, lcRegExp, 1, "fnFormatService\(\1, \2\)") ;
) ;
, [ ")] ;
, [")] ;
)


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Bloggers consider forming labor union

[MB Software Solutions]

Chet Gardiner wrote:
> There already is one:
>
> www.iww.org
>
> I'm already a member...
>
> http://www.iww.org/unions/dept500/iu560/
>   

Weren't the CCW once affiliated with the IBEW?

-- 
Michael J. Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
http://fabmate.com
"Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!"



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Bloggers consider forming labor union

[Whil Hentzen (Pro*)]

Chet Gardiner wrote:
> A union with any real power is impossible in the U.S. of freakin' A

Is that why guys with a 4th grade education and biceps bigger than my 
chest make $250,000 a year driving a crane at the LA docks?

Or WI teachers have a better health plan than the US Congress, yet still 
get bitch and moan about how poor they are?

/snicker/

WAY OT. I'm outa here!

Whil



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Bloggers consider forming labor union

[MB Software Solutions]

Whil Hentzen (Pro*) wrote:
> Chet Gardiner wrote:
>   
>> A union with any real power is impossible in the U.S. of freakin' A
>> 
>
> Is that why guys with a 4th grade education and biceps bigger than my 
> chest make $250,000 a year driving a crane at the LA docks?
>   

Cost of living out there means that's just above minimum wage.  lol!

> Or WI teachers have a better health plan than the US Congress, yet still 
> get bitch and moan about how poor they are?
>   
NO ONE has a healthcare plan better than Congress.  I tell you, if 
Congress had the healthcare plan like the rest of us, you'd REALLY see 
them do something about healthcare!


-- 
Michael J. Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
http://fabmate.com
"Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!"



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] Bloggers consider forming labor union

[Chet Gardiner]

I guess it's theoretically possible for an L.A. Longshoreman to work 130 
hours a week...but not for long...  That's what it would take for one to 
make 250K per year...

As for WI teachers -- how far does $43,000 go in WI?   They're at 91% of 
the nation's average for teacher pay...  What a huge salary for just a 
lousy 50-60 hours per week!  Damn Unions!!!

I see a median house in WI is about $150,000 -- don't think $43K/year 
would qualify...

I guess I'd put you down in the knee-jerk anti-union column, eh Whil???

C

Whil Hentzen (Pro*) wrote:
> Chet Gardiner wrote:
>   
>> A union with any real power is impossible in the U.S. of freakin' A
>> 
>
> Is that why guys with a 4th grade education and biceps bigger than my 
> chest make $250,000 a year driving a crane at the LA docks?
>
> Or WI teachers have a better health plan than the US Congress, yet still 
> get bitch and moan about how poor they are?
>
> /snicker/
>
> WAY OT. I'm outa here!
>
> Whil
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Bloggers consider forming labor union

[Chet Gardiner]

Congress has the best there is...

Socialized, Government Financed Health Care...



MB Software Solutions wrote:
> Whil Hentzen (Pro*) wrote:
>   
>> Chet Gardiner wrote:
>>   
>> 
>>> A union with any real power is impossible in the U.S. of freakin' A
>>> 
>>>   
>> Is that why guys with a 4th grade education and biceps bigger than my 
>> chest make $250,000 a year driving a crane at the LA docks?
>>   
>> 
>
> Cost of living out there means that's just above minimum wage.  lol!
>
>   
>> Or WI teachers have a better health plan than the US Congress, yet still 
>> get bitch and moan about how poor they are?
>>   
>> 
> NO ONE has a healthcare plan better than Congress.  I tell you, if 
> Congress had the healthcare plan like the rest of us, you'd REALLY see 
> them do something about healthcare!
>
>
>   


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] Bloggers consider forming labor union

[Michael Madigan]

1.  Longshoremen don't actually have to work 130
hours, they just have to write it on their timesheet.

2.  You're leaving out the outrageous benefits of
being a teacher

a  10 weeks vacation (1/5 of the year)
b. outrageous health insurance benefits
c. lifetime job security
d. getting every phony holiday off

Works out to about $100k a year minimum

Additionally, how do you call yourself a professional
and still belong to a union?  






--- Chet Gardiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I guess it's theoretically possible for an L.A.
> Longshoreman to work 130 
> hours a week...but not for long...  That's what it
> would take for one to 
> make 250K per year...
> 
> As for WI teachers -- how far does $43,000 go in WI?
>   They're at 91% of 
> the nation's average for teacher pay...  What a huge
> salary for just a 
> lousy 50-60 hours per week!  Damn Unions!!!
> 
> I see a median house in WI is about $150,000 --
> don't think $43K/year 
> would qualify...
> 
> I guess I'd put you down in the knee-jerk anti-union
> column, eh Whil???
> 
> C
> 
> Whil Hentzen (Pro*) wrote:
> > Chet Gardiner wrote:
> >   
> >> A union with any real power is impossible in the
> U.S. of freakin' A
> >> 
> >
> > Is that why guys with a 4th grade education and
> biceps bigger than my 
> > chest make $250,000 a year driving a crane at the
> LA docks?
> >
> > Or WI teachers have a better health plan than the
> US Congress, yet still 
> > get bitch and moan about how poor they are?
> >
> > /snicker/
> >
> > WAY OT. I'm outa here!
> >
> > Whil
> >
> >
> >
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [OT] And the saga continues ...

[John Harvey]

True about the risk, but usually you have so much equity, it's worth the
risk. Somehow, I think you are in that boat. The downside comes into play
when/if you have to liquidate. Timing is everything, ain't it!

John

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Kristyne McDaniel
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 3:33 PM
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Subject: RE: [OT] And the saga continues ...

John,

> Some people pay thousands of dollars for just that! God 
> listens and answers your prayers too, doesn't He?

Yes, and so far we've been hanging in there. Sometimes the answer is NO, but
we do get an answer.

There is always a level of risk when you build a house via construction
financing and you don't have a bug $$$ cushion somewhere for shortfalls. We
didn't know our risk was this large, but there is a risk nonetheless.

Kristyne




[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]@shelbynet.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Bloggers consider forming labor union

[Michael Madigan]

Nonsense.  They're not forced to wait for hours in a
waiting room, or wait 2 months for a mamogram, or wait
a year to get chemo.


--- Chet Gardiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Congress has the best there is...
> 
> Socialized, Government Financed Health Care...
> 
> 
> 
> MB Software Solutions wrote:
> > Whil Hentzen (Pro*) wrote:
> >   
> >> Chet Gardiner wrote:
> >>   
> >> 
> >>> A union with any real power is impossible in the
> U.S. of freakin' A
> >>> 
> >>>   
> >> Is that why guys with a 4th grade education and
> biceps bigger than my 
> >> chest make $250,000 a year driving a crane at the
> LA docks?
> >>   
> >> 
> >
> > Cost of living out there means that's just above
> minimum wage.  lol!
> >
> >   
> >> Or WI teachers have a better health plan than the
> US Congress, yet still 
> >> get bitch and moan about how poor they are?
> >>   
> >> 
> > NO ONE has a healthcare plan better than Congress.
>  I tell you, if 
> > Congress had the healthcare plan like the rest of
> us, you'd REALLY see 
> > them do something about healthcare!
> >
> >
> >   
> 
> 
> ___
> Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
> Subscription Maintenance:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
> OT-free version of this list:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
> Searchable Archive:
> http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
> This message:
>
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise,
> are the opinions of the author, and do not
> constitute legal or medical advice. This statement
> is added to the messages for those lawyers who are
> too stupid to see the obvious.
> 



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] Bloggers consider forming labor union

[Pete Theisen]

On Tuesday 07 August 2007 17:02, Michael Madigan wrote:
> 1.  Longshoremen don't actually have to work 130
> hours, they just have to write it on their timesheet.
>
> 2.  You're leaving out the outrageous benefits of
> being a teacher
>
> a  10 weeks vacation (1/5 of the year)
> b. outrageous health insurance benefits
> c. lifetime job security
> d. getting every phony holiday off
>
> Works out to about $100k a year minimum

Hi Michael!

Given the opportunity, both labor and management are equally capable of being 
unethical and taking advantage. We have met the enemy and he are Pogo.
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

[NF] FireFox extensions --- (was : Thoughtful Post on Windows Vista)

[Ricardo Aráoz]

Allen wrote:
> I used firefox from early days. It was good but I had problems on some
> sites, especially https sites for some reason. However apart from that
> problem I mentioned I prefer ie tabs. Its not fopr ocx either as I don’t
> allow then as a rule, including flash. I will look at version 3 when it
> appears.
> Allen
>  

I actually use FireFox 2.0.0.5 and I really like it. I have a few
extensions added that make my life easier :

Add Bookmark Here : adds an option into the bookmarks menu to add the
actual bookmark to the menu you are standing on

All-in-One Sidebar : Sidebar with favorites, history, downloads,
extensions and web page info

Bookmark Duplicate Detector : Warns me when I'm duplicating my
bookmarks, also checks my bookmarks for duplicates and allows me to
correct them.

Download Manager Tweak.

FasterFox : Performance tweak

FEBE : Backs up all my FireFox data (i.e. extensions, themes, bookmarks,
preferences, history, permissions, etc:) to directory in my pen drive,
then I can have all my FireFox browsers set the same way.

FireFox Showcase : button that displays a window with thumbnails of all
the tabs I have open and allows me to go to one, close one etc.

FoxMarks : Bookmark synchronizer. To keep my bookmards synchronized in
all my machines.

Tab Mix Plus : Must Have! lets me tweak the way my tabs act and
appearance, hundreds of settings.

That's it. Anyone would like to share his favorite extensions?

> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Man-wai Chang
> Sent: 06 August 2007 14:38
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [NF] Thoughtful Post on Windows Vista]
> 
>> I went back to ie now it has tabs. But there is one thing that is 
>> really getting on my nerves. That is if you start typing in the 
>> address or google
> 
> Firefox has gotten tabs long before IE 7 was born. Firefox also got lots of
> add-ons that could really please you. Firefox also adheres to web standards.
> 
> It's now version 2.0.0.6 and Firefox 3 is coming. :)
>



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Optimizations?

[Ricardo Aráoz]

MB Software Solutions wrote:
> Ed Leafe wrote:
>>  First off, this is a view, which means that you shouldn't have a ton  
>> of records. My guess is that a LOCATE even without indexes will be  
>> plenty fast.
>>
>>  Are you seeing delays that are causing you to pursue this?
>>
>>   
> 
> Not exactly delays, but just tons of iterations.  There are 600+ records 
> that go through this routine (which thankfully isn't called too often).  

You might try a SELECT statement combining your 600 records with the
view. You write it so that it will return those records that match or
those that don't match or their quantities depending on your needs. That
might speed it up a bit (maybe).

For example :

SELECT MyView.* ;
into cursor CrsrFoundItems ;
from MyView V;
inner join My600records R;
on V.RecType = R.RecType ;
AND V.iKey = R.iKey ;
where V.JobID = this.nJobID
and now you process your hits.

SELECT MyView.* ;
into cursor CrsrFoundItems ;
from MyView V;
left join My600records R;
on V.RecType = R.RecType ;
AND V.iKey = R.iKey ;
having isNull(R.RetType) or V.JobId # this.nJobId
and now you process you misses.


> I used Markus Egger's Coverage Profiler add-in tool to show me what code 
> is slow and running lots of times.  This was brought about by a 
> significant delay in the start of a process. 
> 
> Unfortunately, I think this is just the way it has to be for this 
> situation's particulars (without going into client detail). 
> 
> Ever get times where you think you're writing butt ugly code and should 
> just stop for the night?  
> 




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] FireFox extensions --- (was : Thoughtful Post on Windows Vista)

[Vince Teachout]

Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
> That's it. Anyone would like to share his favorite extensions?
>   
Thanks for the list, Ricardo - a few of those sound handy. 
I miss the feature Opera used to have - right click and create shortcut 
on desktop.

The only extension I use in Firefox currently is one of the ones that 
let you snag video from web pages.


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Optimizations?

[MB Software Solutions]

Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
> You might try a SELECT statement combining your 600 records with the
> view. You write it so that it will return those records that match or
> those that don't match or their quantities depending on your needs. That
> might speed it up a bit (maybe).
>   
Thanks, but the 600 records WAS the view.


-- 
Michael J. Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
http://fabmate.com
"Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!"



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] FireFox extensions --- (was : Thoughtful Post on Windows Vista)

[Ted Roche]

FireBug. Fantastic debugging tool for taking apart web pages,
examining CSS and javaScipt, working through pading and spacing and
margins and borders.

Web Developer: a couple features missing from FireBug. On-screen ruler
is better than FB.

-- 
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Sacramental Register 7.1 Released...

[Bill Anderson]

Now this app is in VFP 9...



Bill Anderson



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Redirecting an exe's Output

[Ricardo Aráoz]

Hi,
been learning some Python and got some weird ideas. Problem is I would
like to accomplish some in VFP. So

Is there a way in VFP (preferably 6.0) to run a '.exe' and redirect it's
output to somewhere inside my VFP program?

TIA



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] Bloggers consider forming labor union

[Chet Gardiner]

For the rational among you who don't believe the RW lies:

The TRUTH about Single-Payer Health Care around the world:

http://www.michaelmoore.com/sicko/checkup/

-

We could have it as soon as the bush crime family has left:


HR 676 - http://www.house.gov/conyers/news_hr676_2.htm


Brief Summary of HR 676

·The United States National Health Insurance Act establishes an 
American national health insurance program. The bill would create a 
publicly financed, privately delivered health care system that uses the 
already existing Medicare program by expanding and improving it to all 
U.S. residents, and all residents living in U.S. territories. The goal 
of the legislation is to ensure that all Americans will have access, 
guaranteed by law, to the highest quality and most cost effective health 
care services regardless of their employment, income, or health status.
·  With over 45-75 million uninsured Americans, and another 50 million 
who are under- insured, the time has come to change our inefficient and 
costly fragmented non health care system.

Who is Eligible

·  Every person living in or visiting the United States and the U.S. 
Territories would receive a United States National Health Insurance Card 
and ID number once they enroll at the appropriate location. Social 
Security numbers may not be used when assigning ID cards.

Health Care Services Covered

·  This program will cover all medically necessary services, including 
primary care, in patient care, outpatient care, emergency care, 
prescription drugs, durable medical equipment, long term care, mental 
health services, dentistry, eye care, chiropractic, and substance abuse 
treatment. Patients have their choice of physicians, providers, 
hospitals, clinics and practices. No co-pays or deductibles are 
permitted under this act.

Conversion To A Non-Profit Health Care System

·  Private health insurers shall be prohibited under this act from 
selling coverage that duplicates the benefits of the USNHI program. 
Exceptions to this rule include coverage for cosmetic surgery, and other 
medically unnecessary treatments. Those who are displaced as the result 
of the transition to a non- profit health care system are the first to 
be hired and retrained under this act.

Cost Containment Provisions/ Reimbursement

·  The National USNHI program will set reimbursement rates annually for 
physicians, allow for "global budgets" (annual lump sums for operating 
expenses) for health care providers; and negotiate prescription drug 
prices. The national office will provide an annual lump sum allotment to 
each existing Medicare region; each region will administer the program.

·  The conversion to a not-for-profit health care system will take place 
over a 15 year period. U.S. treasury bonds will be sold to compensate 
investor-owned providers for the actual appraised value of converted 
facilities used in the delivery of care; payment will not be made for 
loss of business profits. Health insurance companies could be 
sub-contracted out to handle reimbursements.

Proposed Funding For USNHI Program:

·  Maintaining current federal and state funding of existing health care 
programs. A modest payroll tax on all employers of 3.3%. A 5% health tax 
on the top 5% of income earners. A small tax on stock and bond 
transfers. Closing corporate tax loop-holes, repealing the Bush tax cut.


---

Keep up the parroting of the discredited right-wing line, old buddy...

You have become a parody of yourself


Michael Madigan wrote:
> Nonsense.  They're not forced to wait for hours in a
> waiting room, or wait 2 months for a mamogram, or wait
> a year to get chemo.
>
>
>   
Nope, you have to go to any ER in the United States for this shit to 
happen!!!



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Sacramental Register 7.1 Released...

[MB Software Solutions]

Bill Anderson wrote:
> Now this app is in VFP 9...
>
> 
>
>   

Are you the (or one of the) primary developer(s) for all of those apps?

-- 
Michael J. Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
http://fabmate.com
"Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!"



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Sacramental Register 7.1 Released...

[Bill Anderson]

MB Software Solutions wrote:
> Bill Anderson wrote:
>   
>> Now this app is in VFP 9...
>>
>> 
>>
>>   
>> 
>
> Are you the (or one of the) primary developer(s) for all of those apps?
>
>   
MS and SR, but not the others. Toni Feltman has one of 'em...

Bill



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [NF] Some people have too much time on their hands

[Dave Crozier]

Funny!

I know a couple of ISP's that fit this profile perfectly!

Dave Crozier

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of David Crooks
Sent: 07 August 2007 22:03
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: [NF] Some people have too much time on their hands

http://www.nouptime.com/

David L. Crooks



[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [NF] FireFox extensions --- (was : Thoughtful Post on Windows Vista)

[Stephen the Cook]

Ricardo Aráoz <> wrote:
 
> Download Manager Tweak.
> 
> FasterFox : Performance tweak
> 
> FEBE : Backs up all my FireFox data (i.e. extensions, themes,
> bookmarks, preferences, history, permissions, etc:) to directory in
> my pen drive, then I can have all my FireFox browsers set the same
> way.   
> 
> FireFox Showcase : button that displays a window with thumbnails of
> all the tabs I have open and allows me to go to one, close one etc. 
> 
> FoxMarks : Bookmark synchronizer. To keep my bookmards synchronized
> in all my machines. 
> 
> Tab Mix Plus : Must Have! lets me tweak the way my tabs act and
> appearance, hundreds of settings. 
> 
> That's it. Anyone would like to share his favorite extensions?

AdBlock
Faster Fox
Forecast Fox
InfoRSS
President Bush Count Down
Stumble upon
Tab Catalog
TinyURL
Undo Closed Tabs
VideoDownloader

Stephen Russell
DBA / .Net Developer

Memphis TN 38115
901.246-0159

"A good way to judge people is by observing how they treat those who
can do them absolutely no good." ---Unknown

http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.8/940 - Release Date: 8/6/2007
4:53 PM
 



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: Sacramental Register 7.1 Released...

[John Harvey]

Looks like Cold fusion to me - cfm?

John

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Bill Anderson
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 8:16 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Sacramental Register 7.1 Released...


Now this app is in VFP 9...



Bill Anderson



[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]@shelbynet.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

[OT] Bloggers consider forming labor union

[richmondeagle]

>For the rational among you who don't believe the RW lies:
>
>The TRUTH about Single-Payer Health Care around the world:
>
>http://www.michaelmoore.com/sicko/checkup/

Thank you for not actually using the words 'Michael Moore' and 'TRUTH' in the 
same sentence.  THAT would have been to much.

What you are missing is the fact that just because you have insurance doen't 
mean you get health care.  Why do you think many Canadians are paying there own 
way to the US to get health care.  Like many of the socialistic schemes... they 
sound good, but don't work.  

All I can say is 'Gag me with a dead smurf."

Larry Miller

--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Sacramental Register 7.1 Released...

[Bill Anderson]

John Harvey wrote:
> Looks like Cold fusion to me - cfm?
>
> John
I would assume the web pages are Cold Fusion, but the desktop app is in 
VFP 9.

Bill



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Sacramental Register 7.1 Released...

[MB Software Solutions]

Bill Anderson wrote:
> MB Software Solutions wrote:
>   
>> Bill Anderson wrote:
>>   
>> 
>>> Now this app is in VFP 9...
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>   
>>> 
>>>   
>> Are you the (or one of the) primary developer(s) for all of those apps?
>>
>>   
>> 
> MS and SR, but not the others. Toni Feltman has one of 'em...
>
> Bill
>
>   

Can I assume then that they're all VFE (Visual Fox Express) based?

-- 
Michael J. Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
http://fabmate.com
"Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!"



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [OT] And the saga continues ...

[Kristyne McDaniel]

John,

> True about the risk, but usually you have so much equity, 
> it's worth the risk. Somehow, I think you are in that
> boat. The downside comes into play when/if you have to
> liquidate. Timing is everything, ain't it!

We thought we had a lot of equity at the start, and we even had a fairly
good cash cushion. But I just haven't been able to make it all work the way
I hoped to.

Our lawyer is having a negotiation meeting with our former general
contractor's lawyer on Thursday. I hope a solution gets worked out. If not,
we are going to have to file a lawsuit, and that's going to rack up dollars
even faster.

Kristyne McDaniel




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Sacramental Register 7.1 Released...

[Bill Anderson]

MB Software Solutions wrote:

Can I assume then that they're all VFE (Visual Fox Express) based?

I haven't seen the source code to all the apps but for the ones I know 
about, yeah, they're all VFE apps...

Bill





___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.