Programmer's day
Please change the category for this and stop wasting bandwidth, this is clearly not either [OT] or [NF] and just demonstrates the laziness of people that can't be bothered to consider that this is far too off topic for off topic and is demonstrably not not foxpro so should be classified [IF] for Is Foxpro related. VBG -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eurico Chagas Filho Sent: 13 September 2008 01:38 To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: [OT] Programmer's day Programmer's day is a whimsical holiday on the 256th day of the year celebrated mostly by computer programmers (reason: 256 = 2 to the power of 8 = the number of values representable in a byte of data). Traditions include drinking, behaving silly, coding silly programs, mini computer games, playing with old computers, etc. Programmer's day usually falls on September 13th; on leap years, it is September 12th. E. [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Programmer's day
Michael Madigan wrote: Coincidently my birthday is Sept 13. Go figure. But, mine's the 9th. How can you be a Virgo, and yet, illogically, vote Republican? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Programmer's day
I figure that: a) It's your birthday b) QED this disproves both survival of the fittest and evolution Happy Birthday. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: 13 September 2008 05:06 To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Programmer's day Coincidently my birthday is Sept 13. Go figure. Now I am become Death, the destroyer of Democrats. - Sarah Palin, Sept 4, 2008 Right Wing Mike http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike --- On Fri, 9/12/08, Eurico Chagas Filho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Eurico Chagas Filho [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [OT] Programmer's day To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Date: Friday, September 12, 2008, 8:37 PM Programmer's day is a whimsical holiday on the 256th day of the year celebrated mostly by computer programmers (reason: 256 = 2 to the power of 8 = the number of values representable in a byte of data). Traditions include drinking, behaving silly, coding silly programs, mini computer games, playing with old computers, etc. Programmer's day usually falls on September 13th; on leap years, it is September 12th. E. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1E4E352E63664126857E34756712A166@ Toshiba ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Programmer's day
How can you illogically believe in Astrology? LMAO Now I am become Death, the destroyer of Democrats. - Sarah Palin, Sept 4, 2008 Right Wing Mike http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike --- On Sat, 9/13/08, Vince Teachout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Vince Teachout [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OT] Programmer's day To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Date: Saturday, September 13, 2008, 2:22 AM Michael Madigan wrote: Coincidently my birthday is Sept 13. Go figure. But, mine's the 9th. How can you be a Virgo, and yet, illogically, vote Republican? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Programmer's day
Then so was William H. Taft See exceptions to every rule.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vince Teachout Sent: 13 September 2008 07:22 To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Programmer's day Michael Madigan wrote: Coincidently my birthday is Sept 13. Go figure. But, mine's the 9th. How can you be a Virgo, and yet, illogically, vote Republican? [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Programmer's day
A trait I add that is never followed by people born under Aries. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: 13 September 2008 07:23 To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Programmer's day How can you illogically believe in Astrology? LMAO ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Programmer's day
Michael Madigan wrote: How can you illogically believe in Astrology? LMAO Astrology, in as much as believing that stars influence our destiny, is clearly nonsense, as the distance, and sheer multitude of stars would clearly either have no effect, or the effects would cancel out. Astrology, as in the observation of common characteristics of people born at certain times of the year, possibly influenced by nutrition (or lack of), or hours or sunlight, or...etc is more likely, but also still probably nonsense. What I *really* meant to say is -- Happy Birthday. :-) ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Programmer's day
It is pretty fitting that your sign is a sheep. Now I am become Death, the destroyer of Democrats. - Sarah Palin, Sept 4, 2008 Right Wing Mike http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike --- On Sat, 9/13/08, Adam Buckland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Adam Buckland [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [OT] Programmer's day To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Date: Saturday, September 13, 2008, 2:28 AM A trait I add that is never followed by people born under Aries. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: 13 September 2008 07:23 To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Programmer's day How can you illogically believe in Astrology? LMAO ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Programmer's day
Thanks! Now I am become Death, the destroyer of Democrats. - Sarah Palin, Sept 4, 2008 Right Wing Mike http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike --- On Sat, 9/13/08, Vince Teachout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Vince Teachout [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OT] Programmer's day To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Date: Saturday, September 13, 2008, 2:32 AM Michael Madigan wrote: How can you illogically believe in Astrology? LMAO Astrology, in as much as believing that stars influence our destiny, is clearly nonsense, as the distance, and sheer multitude of stars would clearly either have no effect, or the effects would cancel out. Astrology, as in the observation of common characteristics of people born at certain times of the year, possibly influenced by nutrition (or lack of), or hours or sunlight, or...etc is more likely, but also still probably nonsense. What I *really* meant to say is -- Happy Birthday. :-) ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Programmer's day
Michael Madigan wrote: How can you illogically believe in Astrology? LMAO Illogically? *ILL*logically? Very easily! Logically? Only with much difficulty. OTOH, with the help of this rather amusing Australian Yellow Tail Shiraz? Well, all things are possible. :-) ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] Will Obama dump Biden for Hillary?
In my opinion, the Republicans would then win by 20 points if this actually happens. http://www.gambling911.com/politics/hillary-clinton-back-democratic-ticket-oddsmakers-pondering-idea-091208.html http://www.nationalledger.com/artman/publish/article_272622667.shtml http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/4978 http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.jsp?articleId=281474977446789 http://www.postchronicle.com/commentary/article_212171504.shtml http://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb-staff/2008/09/11/open-thread Now I am become Death, the destroyer of Democrats. - Sarah Palin, Sept 4, 2008 Right Wing Mike http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Will Obama dump Biden for Hillary?
Michael Madigan wrote: In my opinion, the Republicans would then win by 20 points if this actually happens. Hi Michael! If the Ds won O would be dead on January 21st, but not to worry, O is behind Biden 1000%. http://www.gambling911.com/politics/hillary-clinton-back-democratic-ticket-oddsmakers-pondering-idea-091208.html http://www.nationalledger.com/artman/publish/article_272622667.shtml http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/4978 http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.jsp?articleId=281474977446789 http://www.postchronicle.com/commentary/article_212171504.shtml http://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb-staff/2008/09/11/open-thread -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] Issues? There are Four
Hi Everybody! We all know where the candidates stand on the four issues and all the candidates know we know, so why discuss them? Pig lipstick is more interesting and reveals character. Surrender as a Foreign Policy: Sure, let the Terrorists and Euros drive all our decisions, we want to be liked rather that live to see our children grow up. Killing Babies and Old People: Nazis said it best - Useless Eaters. Homosexual Agenda: This 1% of the people MUST drive our domestic policy, unthinkable that it would be anything else. Personal Right of Self Defense: Oh, come ON! When seconds count the police will be there in minutes. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] Why sexually violate the kids when you can sell them drugs?
Hi Everybody! http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/sns-ap-priest-drug-arrest,0,3364748.story or http://tinyurl.com/54h8fg -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] Mary Mitchell makes me sick.
Hi Everybody! http://www.suntimes.com/news/mitchell/1161035,CST-NWS-mitch14.article Palin should be laughingstock to all feminists Instead, this fast talker is a star -- and that scares me September 13, 2008 BY MARY MITCHELL Sun-Times Columnist Sarah Palin makes me sick. I hate that she was able to steal Barack Obama's mojo Quick, without looking at the picture, what does Mary Mitchell look like? ROFL -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] 16 years of good work ahead for Tina Fey
Hi Everybody! 8 years spoofing Vice President Sarah Palin, 8 more spoofing President Sarah Palin, Fey will be able to retire comfortably at 54. http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jPtCAjwm4PJCqoD7lgJ0qU3Ya1sgD935JOSG0 -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] Belushi lives
Hi Everybody! http://www.nbc.com/Saturday_Night_Live/video/clips/samurai-delicatessen/2361/ -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Programmer's day
Adam Buckland wrote: Please change the category for this and stop wasting bandwidth, this is clearly not either [OT] or [NF] and just demonstrates the laziness of people that can't be bothered to consider that this is far too off topic for off topic and is demonstrably not not foxpro so should be classified [IF] for Is Foxpro related. Hi Adam, I'm new to this group. Please can you explain me what [OT] and [NF] mean in this group? Till now I'm used to use [OT] as Off Topic mark from other groups. Thanks. Petr Vileta, Czech republic (My server rejects all messages from Yahoo and Hotmail. Send me your mail from another non-spammer site please.) ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Programmer's day
Greetings, and Welcome, Petr, from the Upstate New York VFP Geek... [OT] is, as you correctly surmised, for topics that are Off Topic. Stuff that really has less to do with technology and more with rants (imho) g. [NF] is for topics that are technically oriented, but Not FoxPro related. This is where a person may ask for help with a LAN or have an Operating System related matter he/she wants to put forth for consideration. A subject with neither [OT] or [NF] indicates it is a FoxPro related subject. If you prefer to be a member with only [NF] and FoxPro related (no [OT]) you can do so. Although I found [OT] subjects quite amusing and informative, after a while I migrated to the technical only part of the ProFox list. Just a personal preference, and overloading of my InBox g... I am hopeful you will find the info we discuss of value. You can retrieve and review archived info at Leafe.com on FoxPro and other areas of discipline (Linux, Dabo, etc.). Regards, Gil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Petr Vileta Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 10:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Programmer's day Adam Buckland wrote: Please change the category for this and stop wasting bandwidth, this is clearly not either [OT] or [NF] and just demonstrates the laziness of people that can't be bothered to consider that this is far too off topic for off topic and is demonstrably not not foxpro so should be classified [IF] for Is Foxpro related. Hi Adam, I'm new to this group. Please can you explain me what [OT] and [NF] mean in this group? Till now I'm used to use [OT] as Off Topic mark from other groups. Thanks. Petr Vileta, Czech republic (My server rejects all messages from Yahoo and Hotmail. Send me your mail from another non-spammer site please.) [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Does God hate republicans?
On Sep 12, 2008, at 10:48 PM, Helio Wakasugui wrote: But I hope Ike doesn't turn into a tragedy for the state... Same here. So far initial reports don't sound as bad as they might have been. -- Ed Leafe ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
FW: DOG FOOD RECALL - Not On Topic, but important enough to violate that little filter
I know this is an Off Topic issue, but if I did not get this out to all of our ProFox ProLinux members and any of our members had pets who became ill, I would feel terrible. I did check out Google for Mars Petcare recall and ascertained it is a valid recall, not a hoax. Please forgive the obvious [OT] intrusion within our technical realm. This is truly coming from one animal lover to others of my ilk. Regards, Gil -Original Message- From: Gil Hale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 11:22 AM To: karen wohlrab Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Joe Hale; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: DOG FOOD RECALL Greetings Karen! Thank you, thank you, than you! We use Pedigree wet packets to give some balance to our Huskies. I will check the remaining packages out right now. Joe, Dave Barb, this is a valid link. You need to check it out to make certain your critters are not impacted by this recall. Gil -Original Message- From: karen wohlrab [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 11:18 AM To: barb levy; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; gil hale; mary tatro; michelle belgiorno; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FW: DOG FOOD RECALL -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DOG FOOD RECALL Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 09:36:03 -0400 Hi Everybody...Just in case you haven't heard yet, there is another pet food recall. Here's the link to see if you have any of the affected products! http://www.petcare.mars.com/ -- Get more out of the Web. Learn 10 hidden secrets of Windows Live. Learn Now --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: FW: DOG FOOD RECALL - Not On Topic, but important enough to violate that little filter
Gil: I would call that a community service announcement and since I have a dog, it is much appreciated. Thanks, Jeff Jeff Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] SanDC, Inc. 623-582-0323 Fax 623-869-0675 Phoenix Python User Group - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gil Hale wrote: I know this is an Off Topic issue, but if I did not get this out to all of our ProFox ProLinux members and any of our members had pets who became ill, I would feel terrible. I did check out Google for Mars Petcare recall and ascertained it is a valid recall, not a hoax. Please forgive the obvious [OT] intrusion within our technical realm. This is truly coming from one animal lover to others of my ilk. Regards, Gil -Original Message- From: Gil Hale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 11:22 AM To: karen wohlrab Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Joe Hale; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: DOG FOOD RECALL Greetings Karen! Thank you, thank you, than you! We use Pedigree wet packets to give some balance to our Huskies. I will check the remaining packages out right now. Joe, Dave Barb, this is a valid link. You need to check it out to make certain your critters are not impacted by this recall. Gil ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: FW: DOG FOOD RECALL - Not On Topic, but important enough to violate that little filter
Gil: I would call that a community service announcement and since I have a dog, it is much appreciated. Well, I have been known to skirt around the [OT] designation in the past, mostly in poking fun at something or someone g. I apprecaite the kind consideration and slack cut to me. Gil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeff Johnson Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 11:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FW: DOG FOOD RECALL - Not On Topic,but important enough to violate that little filter Gil: I would call that a community service announcement and since I have a dog, it is much appreciated. Thanks, Jeff Jeff Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] SanDC, Inc. 623-582-0323 Fax 623-869-0675 Phoenix Python User Group - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gil Hale wrote: I know this is an Off Topic issue, but if I did not get this out to all of our ProFox ProLinux members and any of our members had pets who became ill, I would feel terrible. I did check out Google for Mars Petcare recall and ascertained it is a valid recall, not a hoax. Please forgive the obvious [OT] intrusion within our technical realm. This is truly coming from one animal lover to others of my ilk. Regards, Gil -Original Message- From: Gil Hale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 11:22 AM To: karen wohlrab Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Joe Hale; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: DOG FOOD RECALL Greetings Karen! Thank you, thank you, than you! We use Pedigree wet packets to give some balance to our Huskies. I will check the remaining packages out right now. Joe, Dave Barb, this is a valid link. You need to check it out to make certain your critters are not impacted by this recall. Gil [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Looking for small network gigabit router recommendation(CLARIFIED)
I am interested to hear what you find. I have been running some really slick 100vg equipment (totally collision free packet transfer), but may need to migrate to gigabit next year. Gil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Malcolm Greene Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 12:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [NF] Looking for small network gigabit router recommendation(CLARIFIED) All, I've continued researching the highly recommended D-Link DIR 655 (about $100 US). My initial concern that this product might have problems with 64-bit OS's (based on comments in NewEgg/Amazon reviews) seems to have been false based on my continued research. I'm going to give this product a try - I'll post back if I run into any problems. Thanks for everyone's help! Malcolm [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Mary Mitchell makes me sick.
Palin scares her but Barack Hussein Obama doesn't. She be a dummy. Now I am become Death, the destroyer of Democrats. - Sarah Palin, Sept 4, 2008 Right Wing Mike http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike --- On Sat, 9/13/08, Pete Theisen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Pete Theisen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [OT] Mary Mitchell makes me sick. To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Date: Saturday, September 13, 2008, 7:03 AM Hi Everybody! http://www.suntimes.com/news/mitchell/1161035,CST-NWS-mitch14.article Palin should be laughingstock to all feminists Instead, this fast talker is a star -- and that scares me September 13, 2008 BY MARY MITCHELL Sun-Times Columnist Sarah Palin makes me sick. I hate that she was able to steal Barack Obama's mojo Quick, without looking at the picture, what does Mary Mitchell look like? ROFL -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: FW: DOG FOOD RECALL - Not On Topic, but important enough to violate that little filter [OT]
Hi Gil! Now we know: Dead dog avoidance is community service announcement on profox. Dead BABY avoidance, on the other hand, is political and merits a summary beating by the [OT] Police. -- Hence my apology in advance. I really meant this to be as Jeff suggested, a Community Service Announcement. Certainly I did not mean to put forth anything that would be construed as controversial, nor trigger any protests. A double apology for you, Pete, as I really did not mean to get anyone wound up on other issues as a result of my message. Gil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Pete Theisen Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 12:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FW: DOG FOOD RECALL - Not On Topic,but important enough to violate that little filter [OT] Gil Hale wrote: Gil: I would call that a community service announcement and since I have a dog, it is much appreciated. Well, I have been known to skirt around the [OT] designation in the past, mostly in poking fun at something or someone g. I apprecaite the kind consideration and slack cut to me. Hi Gil! Now we know: Dead dog avoidance is community service announcement on profox. Dead BABY avoidance, on the other hand, is political and merits a summary beating by the [OT] Police. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Looking for small network gigabit router recommendation(CLARIFIED)
Can you use existing CAT 5 cabling or do you have to upgrade to CAT 6? --- On Sat, 9/13/08, Gil Hale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Gil Hale [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [NF] Looking for small network gigabit router recommendation(CLARIFIED) To: profox@leafe.com Date: Saturday, September 13, 2008, 12:06 PM I am interested to hear what you find. I have been running some really slick 100vg equipment (totally collision free packet transfer), but may need to migrate to gigabit next year. Gil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Malcolm Greene Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 12:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [NF] Looking for small network gigabit router recommendation(CLARIFIED) All, I've continued researching the highly recommended D-Link DIR 655 (about $100 US). My initial concern that this product might have problems with 64-bit OS's (based on comments in NewEgg/Amazon reviews) seems to have been false based on my continued research. I'm going to give this product a try - I'll post back if I run into any problems. Thanks for everyone's help! Malcolm [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] 16 years of good work ahead for Tina Fey
What will these libs do for a living if Obama wins? Now I am become Death, the destroyer of Democrats. - Sarah Palin, Sept 4, 2008 Right Wing Mike http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike --- On Sat, 9/13/08, Pete Theisen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Pete Theisen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [OT] 16 years of good work ahead for Tina Fey To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Date: Saturday, September 13, 2008, 7:14 AM Hi Everybody! 8 years spoofing Vice President Sarah Palin, 8 more spoofing President Sarah Palin, Fey will be able to retire comfortably at 54. http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jPtCAjwm4PJCqoD7lgJ0qU3Ya1sgD935JOSG0 -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Looking for small network gigabit routerrecommendation(CLARIFIED)
I have always heard Cat5e was adequate for 1,000mps. But Cat6 could not hurt, eh? Once all my Cat5e stock is expended I am going to migrate to Cat6, just because. Gil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 12:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [NF] Looking for small network gigabit routerrecommendation(CLARIFIED) Can you use existing CAT 5 cabling or do you have to upgrade to CAT 6? --- On Sat, 9/13/08, Gil Hale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Gil Hale [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [NF] Looking for small network gigabit router recommendation(CLARIFIED) To: profox@leafe.com Date: Saturday, September 13, 2008, 12:06 PM I am interested to hear what you find. I have been running some really slick 100vg equipment (totally collision free packet transfer), but may need to migrate to gigabit next year. Gil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Malcolm Greene Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 12:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [NF] Looking for small network gigabit router recommendation(CLARIFIED) All, I've continued researching the highly recommended D-Link DIR 655 (about $100 US). My initial concern that this product might have problems with 64-bit OS's (based on comments in NewEgg/Amazon reviews) seems to have been false based on my continued research. I'm going to give this product a try - I'll post back if I run into any problems. Thanks for everyone's help! Malcolm [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Looking for small network gigabit routerrecommendation(CLARIFIED)
On Sep 13, 2008, at 11:16 AM, Gil Hale wrote: I have always heard Cat5e was adequate for 1,000mps. But Cat6 could not hurt, eh? Once all my Cat5e stock is expended I am going to migrate to Cat6, just because. Why bother with Cat6? Why not go straight to Cat7 and be prepared for the next decade? ;-) -- Ed Leafe ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Looking for small network gigabitrouterrecommendation(CLARIFIED)
Why bother with Cat6? Why not go straight to Cat7 and be prepared for the next decade? ;-) Cuz I have not seen Cat7 g... Gil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ed Leafe Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 12:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [NF] Looking for small network gigabitrouterrecommendation(CLARIFIED) On Sep 13, 2008, at 11:16 AM, Gil Hale wrote: I have always heard Cat5e was adequate for 1,000mps. But Cat6 could not hurt, eh? Once all my Cat5e stock is expended I am going to migrate to Cat6, just because. Why bother with Cat6? Why not go straight to Cat7 and be prepared for the next decade? ;-) -- Ed Leafe [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Looking for small network gigabitrouterrecommendation(CLARIFIED)
Why bother with Cat6? Why not go straight to Cat7 and be prepared for the next decade? ;-) -- Ed Leafe Sheee-ittt! There is a Cat7 spec! http://www.connectworld.net/syscon/support.htm 1. What is the difference between CAT-5, CAT-5e, CAT-6, CAT-7... The Simple Answer: CAT-5 is rated to 100M CAT-5e is rated to 350M keep reading below, used for gigabit - Gil CAT-6 and CAT6e is rated to 550M or 1000M depending on your source CAT-7 is supposedly rated to 700M or presumably 1000M Today there is no approved CAT-6 or CAT-7. While some folks are selling products they call Level 6 or 7, there aren't even specs for them, making CAT-5e the best available option. CAT-6 cable is being made with 23 guage conductor wire as opposed to the slightly smaller 24 guage for CAT-5e and also has a separator to handle crosstalk better. Both CAT-5 and CAT-5e have 100 ohm impedance and electrical characteristics supporting transmissions up to 100 MHz. The differences between CAT-5 and CAT-5e show in all aspects of performance: capacitance, frequency, resistance, attenuation, and NEXT. CAT-5e components were designed with high-speed gigabit Ethernet in mind. While CAT-5 components may function to some degree in a gigabit Ethernet, they perform below standard during high-data transfer scenarios. CAT-5e cables work with ATM and gigabit speed products. Simply, if you are using a 100Mbps switch, get CAT-5e cable instead of CAT-5. CAT-5e is formally called ANSI/TIA/EIA 568A-5 or simply Cat-5e (the e stands for 'enhanced'). CAT-5e is completely backward compatible with current CAT-5 equipment. The enhanced electrical performance of CAT-5e ensures that the cable will support applications that require additional bandwidth, such as gigabit Ethernet or analog video. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ed Leafe Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 12:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [NF] Looking for small network gigabitrouterrecommendation(CLARIFIED) On Sep 13, 2008, at 11:16 AM, Gil Hale wrote: I have always heard Cat5e was adequate for 1,000mps. But Cat6 could not hurt, eh? Once all my Cat5e stock is expended I am going to migrate to Cat6, just because. Why bother with Cat6? Why not go straight to Cat7 and be prepared for the next decade? ;-) -- Ed Leafe [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: FW: DOG FOOD RECALL - Not On Topic, but important enough to violate that little filter [OT]
Gil Hale wrote: Now we know: Dead dog avoidance is community service announcement on profox. Dead BABY avoidance, on the other hand, is political and merits a summary beating by the [OT] Police. -- Hence my apology in advance. I really meant this to be as Jeff suggested, a Community Service Announcement. Certainly I did not mean to put forth anything that would be construed as controversial, nor trigger any protests. A double apology for you, Pete, as I really did not mean to get anyone wound up on other issues as a result of my message. Gil Hale wrote: Gil: I would call that a community service announcement and since I have a dog, it is much appreciated. Hi Gil! You need not apologize to ME, I enjoy pointing out the hypocrisy of the snobby ones of whatever persuasion. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Looking for small network gigabit router recommendation(CLARIFIED)
That's my problem. You need to upgrade the cabling to at least CAT6. My reason for purchasing it was to replace a defunct router and there was no reason not to get the DIR-655. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 12:14 To: ProFox Email List Subject: RE: [NF] Looking for small network gigabit router recommendation(CLARIFIED) Can you use existing CAT 5 cabling or do you have to upgrade to CAT 6? --- On Sat, 9/13/08, Gil Hale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Gil Hale [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [NF] Looking for small network gigabit router recommendation(CLARIFIED) To: profox@leafe.com Date: Saturday, September 13, 2008, 12:06 PM I am interested to hear what you find. I have been running some really slick 100vg equipment (totally collision free packet transfer), but may need to migrate to gigabit next year. Gil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Malcolm Greene Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 12:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [NF] Looking for small network gigabit router recommendation(CLARIFIED) All, I've continued researching the highly recommended D-Link DIR 655 (about $100 US). My initial concern that this product might have problems with 64-bit OS's (based on comments in NewEgg/Amazon reviews) seems to have been false based on my continued research. I'm going to give this product a try - I'll post back if I run into any problems. Thanks for everyone's help! Malcolm [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Looking for small network gigabit router recommendation (CLARIFIED)
At 2008-09-13 18:02, Malcolm wrote: I've continued researching the highly recommended D-Link DIR 655 (about $100 US). A little background story to why I bought this router - maybe someone finds it useful... I'm connected to the citys fiber-lan via ethernet.and pays for 100Mb/10Mb downstream/upstream which cost me about 20/30$ a month. Pretty good deal I think. Only problem was I only got about 20Mb/20Mb ie 20% of the promised downstream, but curiously enough about 100% better upstream. I used a Netgear WGT624 router at the time, and after some research checking cabling and the citys switch, founding no faults, I decided to upgrade the routers firmware. The results was about 100% better! I got about 40Mb/36Mb. After research of reviews and such I decided to buy the DIR-655, mostly based on the very high througput on LAN. I don't use the WAN at the moment but I want the speed between computers and backup NAS to be as fast as possible. Guess what - with this router I now get as high speed as 94Mb/72Mb - I'm happy :) ** * Dan Olsson * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.dolittle.se ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] 16 years of good work ahead for Tina Fey
Michael Madigan wrote: What will these libs do for a living if Obama wins? Hi Michael! They can spoof Obama, he is more ridiculous than any straight R. Heck, look how well Vaughn Meader did until Kennedy was shot. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaughn_Meader 8 years spoofing Vice President Sarah Palin, 8 more spoofing President Sarah Palin, Fey will be able to retire comfortably at 54. http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jPtCAjwm4PJCqoD7lgJ0qU3Ya1sgD935JOSG0 -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Mary Mitchell makes me sick.
Michael Madigan wrote: Palin scares her but Barack Hussein Obama doesn't. She be a dummy. Hi Michael! Thas beeze, not be. Git yer Ebonics rights. http://www.suntimes.com/news/mitchell/1161035,CST-NWS-mitch14.article BY MARY MITCHELL Sun-Times Columnist Sarah Palin makes me sick. I hate that she was able to steal Barack Obama's mojo -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: FW: DOG FOOD RECALL - Not On Topic, but important enough to violate that little filter
Gil Hale wrote: Gil: I would call that a community service announcement and since I have a dog, it is much appreciated. Well, I have been known to skirt around the [OT] designation in the past, mostly in poking fun at something or someone g. I apprecaite the kind consideration and slack cut to me. Gil Gil, I have a dog too but you are wasting tons of bandwidth with these posts, and you know bandwidth is an endangered species. Same on you! ;cP ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Looking for small network gigabitrouter recommendation(CLARIFIED)
That's my problem. You need to upgrade the cabling to at least CAT6. Nope, just Cat53. Look at the other eMail I sent to ProFox on that, or go to: http://www.connectworld.net/syscon/support.htm Gil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Anthony J. Gundrum Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 12:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [NF] Looking for small network gigabitrouter recommendation(CLARIFIED) That's my problem. You need to upgrade the cabling to at least CAT6. My reason for purchasing it was to replace a defunct router and there was no reason not to get the DIR-655. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 12:14 To: ProFox Email List Subject: RE: [NF] Looking for small network gigabit router recommendation(CLARIFIED) Can you use existing CAT 5 cabling or do you have to upgrade to CAT 6? --- On Sat, 9/13/08, Gil Hale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Gil Hale [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [NF] Looking for small network gigabit router recommendation(CLARIFIED) To: profox@leafe.com Date: Saturday, September 13, 2008, 12:06 PM I am interested to hear what you find. I have been running some really slick 100vg equipment (totally collision free packet transfer), but may need to migrate to gigabit next year. Gil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Malcolm Greene Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 12:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [NF] Looking for small network gigabit router recommendation(CLARIFIED) All, I've continued researching the highly recommended D-Link DIR 655 (about $100 US). My initial concern that this product might have problems with 64-bit OS's (based on comments in NewEgg/Amazon reviews) seems to have been false based on my continued research. I'm going to give this product a try - I'll post back if I run into any problems. Thanks for everyone's help! Malcolm [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Looking for small network gigabit routerrecommendation (CLARIFIED)
Guess what - with this router I now get as high speed as 94Mb/72Mb - I'm happy :) Brat! Gil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dan Olsson Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 1:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [NF] Looking for small network gigabit routerrecommendation (CLARIFIED) At 2008-09-13 18:02, Malcolm wrote: I've continued researching the highly recommended D-Link DIR 655 (about $100 US). A little background story to why I bought this router - maybe someone finds it useful... I'm connected to the citys fiber-lan via ethernet.and pays for 100Mb/10Mb downstream/upstream which cost me about 20/30$ a month. Pretty good deal I think. Only problem was I only got about 20Mb/20Mb ie 20% of the promised downstream, but curiously enough about 100% better upstream. I used a Netgear WGT624 router at the time, and after some research checking cabling and the citys switch, founding no faults, I decided to upgrade the routers firmware. The results was about 100% better! I got about 40Mb/36Mb. After research of reviews and such I decided to buy the DIR-655, mostly based on the very high througput on LAN. I don't use the WAN at the moment but I want the speed between computers and backup NAS to be as fast as possible. Guess what - with this router I now get as high speed as 94Mb/72Mb - I'm happy :) ** * Dan Olsson * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.dolittle.se [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: FW: DOG FOOD RECALL - Not On Topic, but important enough to violate that little filter
Gil, I have a dog too but you are wasting tons of bandwidth with these posts, and you know bandwidth is an endangered species. Same on you! ;cP Did I mention how I am using recycled electrons? That is based on an Enron hatched plan years ago to somehow utilize wasted bandwidth during low Internet use for high activity period use bandwidth demand (via their highly proprietary/propiratary PFM technique, Pure F'ing Magic). It worked out so well, along with other fantasy business plans Enron was practicing, that today they are, uh, wait a minute... Never mind. Gil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ricardo Araoz Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 1:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FW: DOG FOOD RECALL - Not On Topic,but important enough to violate that little filter Gil Hale wrote: Gil: I would call that a community service announcement and since I have a dog, it is much appreciated. Well, I have been known to skirt around the [OT] designation in the past, mostly in poking fun at something or someone g. I apprecaite the kind consideration and slack cut to me. Gil Gil, I have a dog too but you are wasting tons of bandwidth with these posts, and you know bandwidth is an endangered species. Same on you! ;cP [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Looking for small networkgigabitrouter recommendation(CLARIFIED)
Cat5e, not Cat53, sorry, typo... Gil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gil Hale Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 1:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [NF] Looking for small networkgigabitrouter recommendation(CLARIFIED) That's my problem. You need to upgrade the cabling to at least CAT6. Nope, just Cat53. Look at the other eMail I sent to ProFox on that, or go to: http://www.connectworld.net/syscon/support.htm Gil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Anthony J. Gundrum Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 12:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [NF] Looking for small network gigabitrouter recommendation(CLARIFIED) That's my problem. You need to upgrade the cabling to at least CAT6. My reason for purchasing it was to replace a defunct router and there was no reason not to get the DIR-655. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 12:14 To: ProFox Email List Subject: RE: [NF] Looking for small network gigabit router recommendation(CLARIFIED) Can you use existing CAT 5 cabling or do you have to upgrade to CAT 6? --- On Sat, 9/13/08, Gil Hale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Gil Hale [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [NF] Looking for small network gigabit router recommendation(CLARIFIED) To: profox@leafe.com Date: Saturday, September 13, 2008, 12:06 PM I am interested to hear what you find. I have been running some really slick 100vg equipment (totally collision free packet transfer), but may need to migrate to gigabit next year. Gil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Malcolm Greene Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 12:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [NF] Looking for small network gigabit router recommendation(CLARIFIED) All, I've continued researching the highly recommended D-Link DIR 655 (about $100 US). My initial concern that this product might have problems with 64-bit OS's (based on comments in NewEgg/Amazon reviews) seems to have been false based on my continued research. I'm going to give this product a try - I'll post back if I run into any problems. Thanks for everyone's help! Malcolm [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Looking for small network gigabitrouter recommendation(CLARIFIED)
Number 12 seems to get to the point. 12. Just tell me what cable I need... If you need patch cords up to 25 feet, use CAT-5e stranded cable for ease of flexibility. If you are making linger runs or going through walls or ceilings, I'd go ahead and use the CAT-6 UTP (solid) cables - if that seems a bit expensive, then go with the CAT-5e UTP. In my case I should be using CAT-6 since I have cabling going through walls and floors over lengths of 25 feet. I know at work we've had issues with reps using CAT-5e with their gigabit laptop connections. Once a CAT-6 or CAT-7 cable was put in all the issues went away. John G. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gil Hale Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 13:35 To: profox@leafe.com Subject: RE: [NF] Looking for small network gigabitrouter recommendation(CLARIFIED) That's my problem. You need to upgrade the cabling to at least CAT6. Nope, just Cat53. Look at the other eMail I sent to ProFox on that, or go to: http://www.connectworld.net/syscon/support.htm Gil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Anthony J. Gundrum Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 12:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [NF] Looking for small network gigabitrouter recommendation(CLARIFIED) That's my problem. You need to upgrade the cabling to at least CAT6. My reason for purchasing it was to replace a defunct router and there was no reason not to get the DIR-655. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 12:14 To: ProFox Email List Subject: RE: [NF] Looking for small network gigabit router recommendation(CLARIFIED) Can you use existing CAT 5 cabling or do you have to upgrade to CAT 6? --- On Sat, 9/13/08, Gil Hale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Gil Hale [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [NF] Looking for small network gigabit router recommendation(CLARIFIED) To: profox@leafe.com Date: Saturday, September 13, 2008, 12:06 PM I am interested to hear what you find. I have been running some really slick 100vg equipment (totally collision free packet transfer), but may need to migrate to gigabit next year. Gil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Malcolm Greene Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 12:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [NF] Looking for small network gigabit router recommendation(CLARIFIED) All, I've continued researching the highly recommended D-Link DIR 655 (about $100 US). My initial concern that this product might have problems with 64-bit OS's (based on comments in NewEgg/Amazon reviews) seems to have been false based on my continued research. I'm going to give this product a try - I'll post back if I run into any problems. Thanks for everyone's help! Malcolm [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] McCain CAN'T email, his fingers won't even let him type.
Hi Everybody! Just when you thought Obama couldn't go any lower. http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/09/obama-ad-email.html -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] The Lying King
http://tinyurl.com/5ftbmf - - - Something tells me they took a few liberties with the German translation. :) But the subtitles transliterated shockingly well with the music... and spirit of the translation. - Bob ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] Can Obama win without the NRA?
Hi Everybody! Looks like they aren't going to endorse him. http://www.nraila.org/news/read/inthenews.aspx?ID=10620 -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Looking for smallnetwork gigabitrouter recommendation(CLARIFIED)
Overbuild and do not ever worry about being under-prepared. If it were me ding new cabling I would go with the max spec I could find also. Gil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Anthony J. Gundrum Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 6:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [NF] Looking for smallnetwork gigabitrouter recommendation(CLARIFIED) Number 12 seems to get to the point. 12. Just tell me what cable I need... If you need patch cords up to 25 feet, use CAT-5e stranded cable for ease of flexibility. If you are making linger runs or going through walls or ceilings, I'd go ahead and use the CAT-6 UTP (solid) cables - if that seems a bit expensive, then go with the CAT-5e UTP. In my case I should be using CAT-6 since I have cabling going through walls and floors over lengths of 25 feet. I know at work we've had issues with reps using CAT-5e with their gigabit laptop connections. Once a CAT-6 or CAT-7 cable was put in all the issues went away. John G. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gil Hale Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 13:35 To: profox@leafe.com Subject: RE: [NF] Looking for small network gigabitrouter recommendation(CLARIFIED) That's my problem. You need to upgrade the cabling to at least CAT6. Nope, just Cat53. Look at the other eMail I sent to ProFox on that, or go to: http://www.connectworld.net/syscon/support.htm Gil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Anthony J. Gundrum Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 12:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [NF] Looking for small network gigabitrouter recommendation(CLARIFIED) That's my problem. You need to upgrade the cabling to at least CAT6. My reason for purchasing it was to replace a defunct router and there was no reason not to get the DIR-655. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 12:14 To: ProFox Email List Subject: RE: [NF] Looking for small network gigabit router recommendation(CLARIFIED) Can you use existing CAT 5 cabling or do you have to upgrade to CAT 6? --- On Sat, 9/13/08, Gil Hale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Gil Hale [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [NF] Looking for small network gigabit router recommendation(CLARIFIED) To: profox@leafe.com Date: Saturday, September 13, 2008, 12:06 PM I am interested to hear what you find. I have been running some really slick 100vg equipment (totally collision free packet transfer), but may need to migrate to gigabit next year. Gil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Malcolm Greene Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 12:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [NF] Looking for small network gigabit router recommendation(CLARIFIED) All, I've continued researching the highly recommended D-Link DIR 655 (about $100 US). My initial concern that this product might have problems with 64-bit OS's (based on comments in NewEgg/Amazon reviews) seems to have been false based on my continued research. I'm going to give this product a try - I'll post back if I run into any problems. Thanks for everyone's help! Malcolm [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Can Obama win without the NRA?
When I first read this post I though it said, Can Obama win without the NBA?. I'm sure he has their vore. Now I am become Death, the destroyer of Democrats. - Sarah Palin, Sept 4, 2008 Right Wing Mike http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike --- On Sat, 9/13/08, Pete Theisen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Pete Theisen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [OT] Can Obama win without the NRA? To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Date: Saturday, September 13, 2008, 11:43 PM Hi Everybody! Looks like they aren't going to endorse him. http://www.nraila.org/news/read/inthenews.aspx?ID=10620 -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
How To Get Started Making Profits
You will be earning a few cents or dollars per click when visitors start clicking on the advertisements displayed on any of your webpages. Trying to earn Adsense revenue by clicking on your own advertisements is considered cheating, and therefore a no-no. http://www.makemoneypoint.com/2008/02/google-adsense-how-to-get-started.html --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups coondomsense group. To post to this group, send email to coondomsense@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/coondomsense?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
