RE: [OT] - Terrorist Threat Levels

2009-10-02 Thread Bob Calco
Clearly, we need more regulation over who thinks what's funny. Oh, where is
the Joke Czar when you need one?

- Bob

 -Original Message-
 From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On
 Behalf Of Geoff
 Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 10:18 PM
 To: 'ProFox Email List'
 Subject: RE: [OT] - Terrorist Threat Levels
 
 only Bob could take something very funny and turn it into pointless
 political posturing.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On
 Behalf
 Of Ricardo Aráoz
 Sent: Friday, 2 October 2009 11:41 AM
 To: ProFox Email List
 Subject: Re: [OT] - Terrorist Threat Levels
 
 Bob Calco wrote:
  Argentina doesn't have threat levels per se but rather national
 moods.
  It recently changed its national mood from Not Crying For You to
 Laughing
  At Our Own Irrelevance. Other moods include Preoccupied With Our
 Own
 Body
  Functions, and Making Up For Our Lack Of Wit By Being Rude.
 Yup, we also have Let's make NATO change their naval tactics and
 Let's use a couple of Exocets. But you've probably never heard about
 them.
 
 BTW, this is an international list (as opposed to a US only list). So
 if
 you are about to insult other nations' character you'd better have a
 thick skin dear (and I don't mean the harmless comments about
 Argentina,
 but the previous posts).
 
   There are
  complex rules governing valid transitions from one mood to another
 but
  nobody understands them, and they don't result in any noticeable
 change of
  behavior.
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On
  Behalf Of Ricardo Aráoz
  Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 6:55 PM
  To: ProFox Email List
  Subject: Re: [OT] - Terrorist Threat Levels
 
  Bob Calco wrote:
 
  Russia lowered its threat level from Actively Support Iran to
 
  Covertly
 
  Support Iran in the face of ineffectual Western sanction-rattling,
 
  and a
 
  naïve US President determined to disarm unilaterally and concede
 huge
 
  swaths
 
  of Eastern Europe back to Russia's sphere of influence.
 
 
  USA went from I don't know why everybody hates us to fighting
  Islamic
  terrorism to let's bomb those towel heads to support our poor
 boys
  dying out there to a final Hey, the war is over there, they are
 not
  supposed to fight back and bring war to New York!.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/008401ca4336$26d37e10$747a7a...@rr.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [OT] - Terrorist Threat Levels

2009-10-02 Thread Michael Madigan
Geoff only laughs when he's kissing a kangaroo

--- On Fri, 10/2/09, Bob Calco bobca...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:

 From: Bob Calco bobca...@tampabay.rr.com
 Subject: RE: [OT] - Terrorist Threat Levels
 To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com
 Date: Friday, October 2, 2009, 3:58 AM
 Clearly, we need more regulation over
 who thinks what's funny. Oh, where is
 the Joke Czar when you need one?
 
 - Bob
 
  -Original Message-
  From: profox-boun...@leafe.com
 [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com]
 On
  Behalf Of Geoff
  Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 10:18 PM
  To: 'ProFox Email List'
  Subject: RE: [OT] - Terrorist Threat Levels
  
  only Bob could take something very funny and turn it
 into pointless
  political posturing.
  
  -Original Message-
  From: profox-boun...@leafe.com
 [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com]
 On
  Behalf
  Of Ricardo Aráoz
  Sent: Friday, 2 October 2009 11:41 AM
  To: ProFox Email List
  Subject: Re: [OT] - Terrorist Threat Levels
  
  Bob Calco wrote:
   Argentina doesn't have threat levels per se but
 rather national
  moods.
   It recently changed its national mood from Not
 Crying For You to
  Laughing
   At Our Own Irrelevance. Other moods include
 Preoccupied With Our
  Own
  Body
   Functions, and Making Up For Our Lack Of Wit By
 Being Rude.
  Yup, we also have Let's make NATO change their naval
 tactics and
  Let's use a couple of Exocets. But you've probably
 never heard about
  them.
  
  BTW, this is an international list (as opposed to a US
 only list). So
  if
  you are about to insult other nations' character you'd
 better have a
  thick skin dear (and I don't mean the harmless
 comments about
  Argentina,
  but the previous posts).
  
    There are
   complex rules governing valid transitions from
 one mood to another
  but
   nobody understands them, and they don't result in
 any noticeable
  change of
   behavior.
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: profox-boun...@leafe.com
 [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com]
 On
   Behalf Of Ricardo Aráoz
   Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 6:55 PM
   To: ProFox Email List
   Subject: Re: [OT] - Terrorist Threat Levels
  
   Bob Calco wrote:
  
   Russia lowered its threat level from
 Actively Support Iran to
  
   Covertly
  
   Support Iran in the face of ineffectual
 Western sanction-rattling,
  
   and a
  
   naïve US President determined to disarm
 unilaterally and concede
  huge
  
   swaths
  
   of Eastern Europe back to Russia's
 sphere of influence.
  
  
   USA went from I don't know why everybody
 hates us to fighting
   Islamic
   terrorism to let's bomb those towel heads
 to support our poor
  boys
   dying out there to a final Hey, the war is
 over there, they are
  not
   supposed to fight back and bring war to New
 York!.
  
  
  
  [excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/183089.61795...@web31408.mail.mud.yahoo.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [OT] - Terrorist Threat Levels

2009-10-02 Thread Bob Calco
 Clearly, we need more regulation over who thinks what's funny. Oh,
 where is
 the Joke Czar when you need one?

Come to think of which, somebody should call Valerie Jarrett about Roman
Polanski's availability to serve in the US soon. He'd fit right in with the
rest of the czars (especially the Safe Schools Czar) and I hear he has great
character references in Hollywood willing to vouch for him.

I only mention the czars in this context because the subject IS terrorist
threat levels...

:)

- Bob

 
 - Bob
 
  -Original Message-
  From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On
  Behalf Of Geoff
  Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 10:18 PM
  To: 'ProFox Email List'
  Subject: RE: [OT] - Terrorist Threat Levels
 
  only Bob could take something very funny and turn it into pointless
  political posturing.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On
  Behalf
  Of Ricardo Aráoz
  Sent: Friday, 2 October 2009 11:41 AM
  To: ProFox Email List
  Subject: Re: [OT] - Terrorist Threat Levels
 
  Bob Calco wrote:
   Argentina doesn't have threat levels per se but rather national
  moods.
   It recently changed its national mood from Not Crying For You to
  Laughing
   At Our Own Irrelevance. Other moods include Preoccupied With Our
  Own
  Body
   Functions, and Making Up For Our Lack Of Wit By Being Rude.
  Yup, we also have Let's make NATO change their naval tactics and
  Let's use a couple of Exocets. But you've probably never heard
 about
  them.
 
  BTW, this is an international list (as opposed to a US only list). So
  if
  you are about to insult other nations' character you'd better have a
  thick skin dear (and I don't mean the harmless comments about
  Argentina,
  but the previous posts).
 
There are
   complex rules governing valid transitions from one mood to another
  but
   nobody understands them, and they don't result in any noticeable
  change of
   behavior.
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com]
 On
   Behalf Of Ricardo Aráoz
   Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 6:55 PM
   To: ProFox Email List
   Subject: Re: [OT] - Terrorist Threat Levels
  
   Bob Calco wrote:
  
   Russia lowered its threat level from Actively Support Iran to
  
   Covertly
  
   Support Iran in the face of ineffectual Western sanction-
 rattling,
  
   and a
  
   naïve US President determined to disarm unilaterally and concede
  huge
  
   swaths
  
   of Eastern Europe back to Russia's sphere of influence.
  
  
   USA went from I don't know why everybody hates us to fighting
   Islamic
   terrorism to let's bomb those towel heads to support our poor
  boys
   dying out there to a final Hey, the war is over there, they are
  not
   supposed to fight back and bring war to New York!.
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/009401ca4338$9cc7f4a0$d657dd...@rr.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [OT] - Terrorist Threat Levels

2009-10-02 Thread Bob Calco
 Bob Calco wrote:
  Argentina doesn't have threat levels per se but rather national
 moods.
  It recently changed its national mood from Not Crying For You to
 Laughing
  At Our Own Irrelevance. Other moods include Preoccupied With Our
 Own Body
  Functions, and Making Up For Our Lack Of Wit By Being Rude.
 Yup, we also have Let's make NATO change their naval tactics and
 Let's use a couple of Exocets. But you've probably never heard about
 them.
 
 BTW, this is an international list (as opposed to a US only list). So
 if
 you are about to insult other nations' character you'd better have a
 thick skin dear (and I don't mean the harmless comments about
 Argentina,
 but the previous posts).

I wasn't insulting Russia's character, just answering Peter's question. ;)

Most Russians in the US would agree with my assessment anyway. You should
hear what Russians in Russia say about the US and our new Prez. Talk about
needing thick skin!

- Bob

 
   There are
  complex rules governing valid transitions from one mood to another
 but
  nobody understands them, and they don't result in any noticeable
 change of
  behavior.
 




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/009501ca4339$19429030$4bc7b0...@rr.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [OT] - Terrorist Threat Levels

2009-10-02 Thread Bob Calco
 Clearly, we need more regulation over who thinks what's funny. Oh,
 where is
 the Joke Czar when you need one?

Come to think of which, somebody should call Valerie Jarrett about Roman
Polanski's availability to serve in the US soon. He'd fit right in with the
rest of the czars (especially the Safe Schools Czar) and I hear he has great
character references in Hollywood willing to vouch for him.

I only mention the czars in this context because the subject IS terrorist
threat levels...

:)

- Bob





___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/009601ca433a$ab8896a0$0299c3...@rr.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: Brought to you by the people who gave you IE

2009-10-02 Thread Alan Bourke
Office 2007, Visual Studio 2008, all unreliable, right.

I can guarantee you they're at least as resilient as any OSS equivalent
that I've seen.
-- 
  Alan Bourke
  alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1254474606.22380.1337698...@webmail.messagingengine.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [OT] - Terrorist Threat Levels

2009-10-02 Thread Geoff
as if to prove the point...

-Original Message-
From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf
Of Bob Calco
Sent: Friday, 2 October 2009 5:29 PM
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Subject: RE: [OT] - Terrorist Threat Levels

Clearly, we need more regulation over who thinks what's funny. Oh, where is
the Joke Czar when you need one?

- Bob

 -Original Message-
 From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On
 Behalf Of Geoff
 Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 10:18 PM
 To: 'ProFox Email List'
 Subject: RE: [OT] - Terrorist Threat Levels
 
 only Bob could take something very funny and turn it into pointless
 political posturing.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On
 Behalf
 Of Ricardo Aráoz
 Sent: Friday, 2 October 2009 11:41 AM
 To: ProFox Email List
 Subject: Re: [OT] - Terrorist Threat Levels
 
 Bob Calco wrote:
  Argentina doesn't have threat levels per se but rather national
 moods.
  It recently changed its national mood from Not Crying For You to
 Laughing
  At Our Own Irrelevance. Other moods include Preoccupied With Our
 Own
 Body
  Functions, and Making Up For Our Lack Of Wit By Being Rude.
 Yup, we also have Let's make NATO change their naval tactics and
 Let's use a couple of Exocets. But you've probably never heard about
 them.
 
 BTW, this is an international list (as opposed to a US only list). So
 if
 you are about to insult other nations' character you'd better have a
 thick skin dear (and I don't mean the harmless comments about
 Argentina,
 but the previous posts).
 
   There are
  complex rules governing valid transitions from one mood to another
 but
  nobody understands them, and they don't result in any noticeable
 change of
  behavior.
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On
  Behalf Of Ricardo Aráoz
  Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 6:55 PM
  To: ProFox Email List
  Subject: Re: [OT] - Terrorist Threat Levels
 
  Bob Calco wrote:
 
  Russia lowered its threat level from Actively Support Iran to
 
  Covertly
 
  Support Iran in the face of ineffectual Western sanction-rattling,
 
  and a
 
  naïve US President determined to disarm unilaterally and concede
 huge
 
  swaths
 
  of Eastern Europe back to Russia's sphere of influence.
 
 
  USA went from I don't know why everybody hates us to fighting
  Islamic
  terrorism to let's bomb those towel heads to support our poor
 boys
  dying out there to a final Hey, the war is over there, they are
 not
  supposed to fight back and bring war to New York!.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/00c801ca4342$40ebacd0$c2c306...@com.au
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


[OT] Czar Opportunities -- was: RE: [OT] - Terrorist Threat Levels

2009-10-02 Thread Bob Calco
 
  Clearly, we need more regulation over who thinks what's funny. Oh,
  where is
  the Joke Czar when you need one?
 
 Come to think of which, somebody should call Valerie Jarrett about
 Roman
 Polanski's availability to serve in the US soon. He'd fit right in with
 the
 rest of the czars (especially the Safe Schools Czar) and I hear he has
 great
 character references in Hollywood willing to vouch for him.

Actually, now that it has been revealed that Letterman was boning his staff
and exposed himself thereby to an extortion racket, he clearly has a better
resume than Polanski for the Joke Czar position. And sometimes, he's even
funny.

A better position for Polanski, given the competitive landscape, might be
the Teen Pregnancy Czar. He clearly knows what needs to be done to deal to
solve THAT problem.

- Bob

 
 I only mention the czars in this context because the subject IS
 terrorist
 threat levels...
 
 :)
 
 - Bob




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/009a01ca4342$57c2fee0$0748fc...@rr.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [OT] - Terrorist Threat Levels

2009-10-02 Thread Bob Calco
Gosh, you're smart. You figure things out so fast!

- Bob

 
 as if to prove the point...
 
 -Original Message-
 From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On
 Behalf
 Of Bob Calco
 Sent: Friday, 2 October 2009 5:29 PM
 To: 'ProFox Email List'
 Subject: RE: [OT] - Terrorist Threat Levels
 
 Clearly, we need more regulation over who thinks what's funny. Oh,
 where is
 the Joke Czar when you need one?
 
 - Bob
 
  -Original Message-
  From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On
  Behalf Of Geoff
  Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 10:18 PM
  To: 'ProFox Email List'
  Subject: RE: [OT] - Terrorist Threat Levels
 
  only Bob could take something very funny and turn it into pointless
  political posturing.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On
  Behalf
  Of Ricardo Aráoz
  Sent: Friday, 2 October 2009 11:41 AM
  To: ProFox Email List
  Subject: Re: [OT] - Terrorist Threat Levels
 
  Bob Calco wrote:
   Argentina doesn't have threat levels per se but rather national
  moods.
   It recently changed its national mood from Not Crying For You to
  Laughing
   At Our Own Irrelevance. Other moods include Preoccupied With Our
  Own
  Body
   Functions, and Making Up For Our Lack Of Wit By Being Rude.
  Yup, we also have Let's make NATO change their naval tactics and
  Let's use a couple of Exocets. But you've probably never heard
 about
  them.
 
  BTW, this is an international list (as opposed to a US only list). So
  if
  you are about to insult other nations' character you'd better have a
  thick skin dear (and I don't mean the harmless comments about
  Argentina,
  but the previous posts).
 
There are
   complex rules governing valid transitions from one mood to another
  but
   nobody understands them, and they don't result in any noticeable
  change of
   behavior.
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com]
 On
   Behalf Of Ricardo Aráoz
   Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 6:55 PM
   To: ProFox Email List
   Subject: Re: [OT] - Terrorist Threat Levels
  
   Bob Calco wrote:
  
   Russia lowered its threat level from Actively Support Iran to
  
   Covertly
  
   Support Iran in the face of ineffectual Western sanction-
 rattling,
  
   and a
  
   naïve US President determined to disarm unilaterally and concede
  huge
  
   swaths
  
   of Eastern Europe back to Russia's sphere of influence.
  
  
   USA went from I don't know why everybody hates us to fighting
   Islamic
   terrorism to let's bomb those towel heads to support our poor
  boys
   dying out there to a final Hey, the war is over there, they are
  not
   supposed to fight back and bring war to New York!.
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/009b01ca4343$b1d1ffc0$1575ff...@rr.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [OT] - Terrorist Threat Levels

2009-10-02 Thread Jean Laeremans
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Bob Calco bobca...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
 Gosh, you're smart. You figure things out so fast!

Are you bothered ?

A+
jml


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/a2b0cc710910020245o470d7d89g2141f52e3a1a9...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [OT] Czar Opportunities

2009-10-02 Thread Bob Calco
OK, rather than criticize Obama all the time, I'm going to do my patriotic
duty and suggest in all earnestness some more Czar positions our Dear Leader
should consider, and candidates for those positions.

Joke Czar 
-
David Letterman - Boned his staff, exposed to extortion racket. Clear
favorite.
Al Franken - Even though he isn't funny, it'd be great to get him out of the
Senate before his ties to ACORN and the voter fraud that gave him his slim
victory are exposed.

Teen Pregnancy Czar
---
Roman Polanski - Hands down (legs up) favorite. He knows the difference
between safe sex and rape-rape (Source: Whoopi Goldberg).

Obesity Czar

Michael Moore - Capitalism may have done nothing for him, but those Twinkies
sure have. Added bonus, he's an avowed Socialist, almost as upfront about it
as Van Jones.

Botox Czar
---
John Kerry - Did you know he served in Viet Nam? Another one whose talents
are wasted in the Senate.

Ass Snarfing Czar
--
Chuck Schumer - A classic example of the candidate defining the position.

Presidential Back Rub Czar
--
Barbara Streisand - Clearly qualified. Or in any case, eager.
Oprah Winfrey - Early favorite. She coined the term The One first.
Chris Matthews - That tingle in his leg emits an electric charge through his
fingertips that are probably therapeutic, if you're into that kind of thing.

Media Accuracy Czar

Dan Rather - Fake but accurate is clearly a standard he defined, and it's
been adopted by all the so-called mainstream news outlets. Who better to
defend Obama's bogus online Certification of Live Birth?

FOX News Watchdog Czar
--
Ed Schultz - We need somebody objective to counter all the CRAZY stuff Beck
is saying. Ed's demonstrated this by famously pointing out on his MSNBC show
that all Republicans want people to die of cancer. 

Olympic Czar

AHnold Schwartzennegger - Need another token Republican-in-name-only (RINO),
and his handling of the California budget shows he's clearly the kind of
person Mayor Daley would love to keep track of expenses for the Olympic
games.

Celebrity Book Czar

Bill Ayers - Without whom Dreams would have never been published. Somebody
needs to fact-check Going Rogue before it hits the shelves.

Religion Czar
--
Jeremiah Wright - His commitment to the Black Liberation Theology of James
Cone and anti-Semitism are just what this nation needs to heal across the
religious divide. 

Bill Maher - He hates religion and loves to mock people who believe in God,
but otherwise he's perfectly qualified and fits in ideologically with the
rest of Team Obama.

Mortgage Loan Czar

Wade Rathke - Founded ACORN, and will need a job soon. His group was very
active in this area.
Barney Frank - Who better to fix the current mess than one of its primary
architects in the House?
Franklin Raines - As head of Fannie Mae during the mortgage debacle, he has
the same basic qualification as Barney Frank, except he's smarter, and gave
lots of $$$ to The One's campaign.

Military Morale Czar
-
Dick Durbin - Famously compared our troops to Nazis and murderers. Why not?
Harry Reid - Also will need a new job soon. Famously advised General
Petraeus that the Iraq war is hopelessly lost, even as the surge was
substantially improving conditions on the ground.

Bipartisanship Czar

This one should be a triumvirate: John McCain, Olympia Snowe, Susan Collins.

Arlen Specter was in the running until he came out of the closet. 

 those are just off the top of my head ideas welcome... ;)

- Bob 


 -Original Message-
 From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On
 Behalf Of Bob Calco
 Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 5:26 AM
 To: 'ProFox Email List'
 Subject: [OT] Czar Opportunities -- was: RE: [OT] - Terrorist Threat
 Levels
 
 
   Clearly, we need more regulation over who thinks what's funny. Oh,
   where is
   the Joke Czar when you need one?
 
  Come to think of which, somebody should call Valerie Jarrett about
  Roman
  Polanski's availability to serve in the US soon. He'd fit right in
 with
  the
  rest of the czars (especially the Safe Schools Czar) and I hear he
 has
  great
  character references in Hollywood willing to vouch for him.
 
 Actually, now that it has been revealed that Letterman was boning his
 staff
 and exposed himself thereby to an extortion racket, he clearly has a
 better
 resume than Polanski for the Joke Czar position. And sometimes, he's
 even
 funny.
 
 A better position for Polanski, given the competitive landscape, might
 be
 the Teen Pregnancy Czar. He clearly knows what needs to be done to deal
 to
 solve THAT problem.
 
 - Bob
 
 
  I only mention the czars in this context because the subject IS
  terrorist
  threat levels...
 
  :)
 
  - Bob
 
 
 
 
[excessive quoting removed by server]


RE: [OT] - Terrorist Threat Levels

2009-10-02 Thread Bob Calco
 
 On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Bob Calco bobca...@tampabay.rr.com
 wrote:
  Gosh, you're smart. You figure things out so fast!
 
 Are you bothered ?

Not at all! Pretty chipper today, actually.

That's at least two or three posts in a row without a yawn. Glad to see
you're feeling better.

- Bob
 
 A+
 jml
 
 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/009d01ca4349$7443bb70$5ccb32...@rr.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: Something free from M$

2009-10-02 Thread Kurt Wendt
I've been reading a bit of this thread. And, today on the train I saw a sign 
which said that Optimum Online customers get free AV protection SW. And, at 
home - our internet is Optimum Online. So, just now I went online - and I found 
that it's the Comp. Assoc.'s Internet Security suite that they are offering up 
to us.

Now - I also know that this Free MS AV is in the 1st release. 

So - I was curious. Anyone have any experience with it? And, anyone have any 
experience with the CA suite? Finally - for this one home PC of mine - I am 
considering just occasionally hitting the TrendMicro free InternetScan deal. 
(This particular computer - I don't do much Net stuff with it - mostly working 
with my 3D animation software.)

Any thoughts???

TIA,
-K-

-Original Message-
From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On 
Behalf Of Stephen Russell
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 10:02 AM

2009/9/30 Ricardo Aráoz ricar...@gmail.com:
 Stephen Russell wrote:
 2009/9/29 Ricardo Aráoz ricar...@gmail.com:
 An innovative marketing trick would be to ship a fully tested product,
 Doesn't everyone?  I don't consider security breeches untested.
 Sure, Micro$hit has NEVER EVER shipped an insufficiently tested product.
 And customers do NEVER EVER say wait till SP2 to buy it.
 I was having this same argument with Cinderella and the Easter Bunny
 last night.
-

I know that wait till SP1 is released and approved has been my mantra
with respect to PRODUCTION systems...


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/289ea162f5642645b5cf64d624c66a1405578...@us-ny-mail-002.waitex.net
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


[OT] Chicago Eliminated in First Round

2009-10-02 Thread Bob Calco
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/olympic_games/8283061.stm

Welcome Back, Carter!

- Bob



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/00a101ca4376$6709ae10$351d0a...@rr.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [OT] Chicago Eliminated in First Round

2009-10-02 Thread Bob Calco
Drudge headline says it all:

THE EGO HAS LANDED

Just to give you a glimpse of what a narcissist Obama is, here are clips
from his speech to the IOC:

- - -
No one expects the Games to solve our collective challenges. But we do
believe that in a world where we have too often witnessed the darker aspects
of our humanity, peaceful competition between nations represents what is
best about our humanity. It brings us together, if only for a few weeks,
face to face. It helps us understand one another just a little better. It
reminds us that no matter how or where we differ, we all seek our own
measure of happiness, and fulfillment, and pride in what we do. And that is
a very powerful starting point for progress.

Nearly one year ago, on a clear November night, people from every corner of
the world gathered in the city of Chicago or in front of their televisions
to watch the results of the U.S. Presidential election. Their interest
wasn't about me as an individual. Rather, it was rooted in the belief that
America's experiment in democracy still speaks to a set of universal
aspirations and ideals. It sprung from the hope that in this ever-shrinking
world, our diversity could be a source of strength and cause for
celebration; and that with sustained work and determination, we could learn
to live and prosper together during the fleeting moment we share on this
Earth.
- - -

Translation:

Why pick Chicago? Because America picked ME. ME ME ME ME ME ME.

I am the HOPE you've been waiting for. So, pick Chicago, please.

If that's not bad enough, get a load of this QA response:

- - -
Responding to a question by Syed Shahid Ali, the IOC member for Pakistan,
about the pretty harrowing experience of many foreign visitors to the US,
he said: One of the legacies I want to see coming out of 2016 is a reminder
that America, at its best, is open to the world. We are putting the full
force of the White house and the State Department into making sure that not
only is this a successful Games but that visitors from all around the world
feel welcome and will come away with a sense of the incredible diversity of
the American people..

We've got everyone. This could be a meeting in Chicago, because we look
like the world. Over the last several years sometimes that fundamental truth
about the United States has been lost, he said.

One of the legacies of this Olympic Games would be the restoration of that
understanding of what the United States is all about and a recognition of
how we are linked to the world.
- - -

Now, this is classic, and the irony is thicker than even Ricardo's cranium.

So, a dude from PAKISTAN asks the President why America's gotten so
difficult for foreigners lately. And The One's answer?

What new?

George Bush. (We all know the last several years is has become his thinly
code-word for George Bush's fault, he uses it all the damn time, almost
like Mark Twain would use an apostrophe.)

What a yutz. I'm glad he didn't get what he wanted; he badly needs an ego
smack down. I'm sad for the country though. Whatever were we thinking on
that clear November night?!

- Bob

 
 http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/olympic_games/8283061.stm
 
 Welcome Back, Carter!
 
 - Bob
 
 
 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/00a201ca437a$31c8ba30$955a2e...@rr.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [OT] Chicago Eliminated in First Round

2009-10-02 Thread Michael Madigan
This guy is the biggest narcissist I have ever seen.  

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcissism

It looks like Obama actually hurt the vote.  Nobody thought Chicago would be 
out in the first round.

Look for Copenhagen and Rio to be hit with cruise missiles later today.




--- On Fri, 10/2/09, Bob Calco bobca...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:

 From: Bob Calco bobca...@tampabay.rr.com
 Subject: RE: [OT] Chicago Eliminated in First Round
 To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com
 Date: Friday, October 2, 2009, 12:05 PM
 Drudge headline says it all:
 
 THE EGO HAS LANDED
 
 Just to give you a glimpse of what a narcissist Obama is,
 here are clips
 from his speech to the IOC:
 
 - - -
 No one expects the Games to solve our collective
 challenges. But we do
 believe that in a world where we have too often witnessed
 the darker aspects
 of our humanity, peaceful competition between nations
 represents what is
 best about our humanity. It brings us together, if only for
 a few weeks,
 face to face. It helps us understand one another just a
 little better. It
 reminds us that no matter how or where we differ, we all
 seek our own
 measure of happiness, and fulfillment, and pride in what we
 do. And that is
 a very powerful starting point for progress.
 
 Nearly one year ago, on a clear November night, people
 from every corner of
 the world gathered in the city of Chicago or in front of
 their televisions
 to watch the results of the U.S. Presidential election.
 Their interest
 wasn't about me as an individual. Rather, it was rooted in
 the belief that
 America's experiment in democracy still speaks to a set of
 universal
 aspirations and ideals. It sprung from the hope that in
 this ever-shrinking
 world, our diversity could be a source of strength and
 cause for
 celebration; and that with sustained work and
 determination, we could learn
 to live and prosper together during the fleeting moment we
 share on this
 Earth.
 - - -
 
 Translation:
 
 Why pick Chicago? Because America picked ME. ME ME ME ME ME
 ME.
 
 I am the HOPE you've been waiting for. So, pick Chicago,
 please.
 
 If that's not bad enough, get a load of this QA
 response:
 
 - - -
 Responding to a question by Syed Shahid Ali, the IOC member
 for Pakistan,
 about the pretty harrowing experience of many foreign
 visitors to the US,
 he said: One of the legacies I want to see coming out of
 2016 is a reminder
 that America, at its best, is open to the world. We are
 putting the full
 force of the White house and the State Department into
 making sure that not
 only is this a successful Games but that visitors from all
 around the world
 feel welcome and will come away with a sense of the
 incredible diversity of
 the American people..
 
 We've got everyone. This could be a meeting in Chicago,
 because we look
 like the world. Over the last several years sometimes that
 fundamental truth
 about the United States has been lost, he said.
 
 One of the legacies of this Olympic Games would be the
 restoration of that
 understanding of what the United States is all about and a
 recognition of
 how we are linked to the world.
 - - -
 
 Now, this is classic, and the irony is thicker than even
 Ricardo's cranium.
 
 So, a dude from PAKISTAN asks the President why America's
 gotten so
 difficult for foreigners lately. And The One's answer?
 
 What new?
 
 George Bush. (We all know the last several years is has
 become his thinly
 code-word for George Bush's fault, he uses it all the
 damn time, almost
 like Mark Twain would use an apostrophe.)
 
 What a yutz. I'm glad he didn't get what he wanted; he
 badly needs an ego
 smack down. I'm sad for the country though. Whatever were
 we thinking on
 that clear November night?!
 
 - Bob
 
  
  http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/olympic_games/8283061.stm
  
  Welcome Back, Carter!
  
  - Bob
  
  
  
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/964287.9346...@web31408.mail.mud.yahoo.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [OT] - Terrorist Threat Levels

2009-10-02 Thread Ricardo Aráoz
Bob Calco wrote:
 Clearly, we need more regulation over who thinks what's funny. Oh, where is
 the Joke Czar when you need one?
   
Let's see if I can explain such a subtle concept if you tell a
French man that all French are cowards and collaborated with the Nazis,
he's not going to laugh.

He may laugh if you in the same line make a similar (in viciousness)
comment about your own country, and only if he's got a HUGE sense of humour.

Is it too complicated? Should I try to simplify the concept for you to
grasp it?



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4ac63ae0.4070...@gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [OT] - Terrorist Threat Levels

2009-10-02 Thread Ricardo Aráoz
Bob Calco wrote:
 Bob Calco wrote:
 
 Argentina doesn't have threat levels per se but rather national
   
 moods.
 
 It recently changed its national mood from Not Crying For You to
   
 Laughing
 
 At Our Own Irrelevance. Other moods include Preoccupied With Our
   
 Own Body
 
 Functions, and Making Up For Our Lack Of Wit By Being Rude.
   
 Yup, we also have Let's make NATO change their naval tactics and
 Let's use a couple of Exocets. But you've probably never heard about
 them.

 BTW, this is an international list (as opposed to a US only list). So
 if
 you are about to insult other nations' character you'd better have a
 thick skin dear (and I don't mean the harmless comments about
 Argentina,
 but the previous posts).
 

 I wasn't insulting Russia's character, just answering Peter's question. ;)
   

What about France, Spain and Belgium? In the originating post?




--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4ac63b37.6070...@gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [OT] Chicago Eliminated in First Round

2009-10-02 Thread Pete Theisen
Michael Madigan wrote:
 This guy is the biggest narcissist I have ever seen.  
 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcissism
 
 It looks like Obama actually hurt the vote.  Nobody thought Chicago would be 
 out in the first round.
 
 Look for Copenhagen and Rio to be hit with cruise missiles later today.

 Just to give you a glimpse of what a narcissist Obama is,

Hi Michael,

Oh, even The One wouldn't have *that* much chutzpah.
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://pete-theisen.com/
http://elect-pete-theisen.com/


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4ac645ae.8040...@verizon.net
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [OT] - Terrorist Threat Levels

2009-10-02 Thread Bob Calco
 
 What about France, Spain and Belgium? In the originating post?
 

I didn't send the original post. But I did think it was funny. Even Geoff
liked it. 

I didn't realize you were such a sensitive guy.

- Bob



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/00a301ca438f$40b2bb80$c21832...@rr.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [OT] - Terrorist Threat Levels

2009-10-02 Thread Bob Calco
 Bob Calco wrote:
  Clearly, we need more regulation over who thinks what's funny. Oh,
 where is
  the Joke Czar when you need one?
 
 Let's see if I can explain such a subtle concept if you tell a
 French man that all French are cowards and collaborated with the Nazis,
 he's not going to laugh.

No, he's going to surrender.

 
 He may laugh if you in the same line make a similar (in viciousness)
 comment about your own country, and only if he's got a HUGE sense of
 humour.
 
 Is it too complicated? Should I try to simplify the concept for you to
 grasp it?

You're too funny.

- Bob

 
 
 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/00a401ca438f$5b13f7a0$113be6...@rr.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: Something free from M$

2009-10-02 Thread Jim Felton
Kurt, I have been using the CA suite from about 7 years now.  It works well
if you take the time to tune it for your system by excluding some folders
form real time protection.  I dropped my swap file and temp folder I control
in the exclusion list. Don't exclude the temp folders Windows, your Browser
or your E-Mail client create. 

Jim 

-Original Message-
From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf
Of Kurt Wendt
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 9:00 AM
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: RE: Something free from M$

I've been reading a bit of this thread. And, today on the train I saw a sign
which said that Optimum Online customers get free AV protection SW. And, at
home - our internet is Optimum Online. So, just now I went online - and I
found that it's the Comp. Assoc.'s Internet Security suite that they are
offering up to us.

Now - I also know that this Free MS AV is in the 1st release. 

So - I was curious. Anyone have any experience with it? And, anyone have any
experience with the CA suite? Finally - for this one home PC of mine - I am
considering just occasionally hitting the TrendMicro free InternetScan deal.
(This particular computer - I don't do much Net stuff with it - mostly
working with my 3D animation software.)

Any thoughts???

TIA,
-K-

-Original Message-
From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On
Behalf Of Stephen Russell
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 10:02 AM

2009/9/30 Ricardo Aráoz ricar...@gmail.com:
 Stephen Russell wrote:
 2009/9/29 Ricardo Aráoz ricar...@gmail.com:
 An innovative marketing trick would be to ship a fully tested product,
 Doesn't everyone?  I don't consider security breeches untested.
 Sure, Micro$hit has NEVER EVER shipped an insufficiently tested product.
 And customers do NEVER EVER say wait till SP2 to buy it.
 I was having this same argument with Cinderella and the Easter Bunny
 last night.
-

I know that wait till SP1 is released and approved has been my mantra
with respect to PRODUCTION systems...


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/7aaa8e74e1464464bed2cdffae9c5...@engineeringm
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [OT] - Terrorist Threat Levels

2009-10-02 Thread Ricardo Aráoz
Bob Calco wrote:
 What about France, Spain and Belgium? In the originating post?

 

 I didn't send the original post. But I did think it was funny. Even Geoff
 liked it. 

 I didn't realize you were such a sensitive guy.
   

I'm not if you are not sensitive about the twin towers.



--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4ac64b2c.4080...@gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: Something free from M$

2009-10-02 Thread Kurt Wendt
Thank you Very much for your input Jim - will take it into advisement.

Regards,
-K-

-Original Message-
From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On 
Behalf Of Jim Felton
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 2:41 PM

Kurt, I have been using the CA suite from about 7 years now.  It works well
if you take the time to tune it for your system by excluding some folders
form real time protection.  I dropped my swap file and temp folder I control
in the exclusion list. Don't exclude the temp folders Windows, your Browser
or your E-Mail client create. 

Jim 

-Original Message-
From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf
Of Kurt Wendt
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 9:00 AM
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: RE: Something free from M$

I've been reading a bit of this thread. And, today on the train I saw a sign
which said that Optimum Online customers get free AV protection SW. And, at
home - our internet is Optimum Online. So, just now I went online - and I
found that it's the Comp. Assoc.'s Internet Security suite that they are
offering up to us.

Now - I also know that this Free MS AV is in the 1st release. 

So - I was curious. Anyone have any experience with it? And, anyone have any
experience with the CA suite? Finally - for this one home PC of mine - I am
considering just occasionally hitting the TrendMicro free InternetScan deal.
(This particular computer - I don't do much Net stuff with it - mostly
working with my 3D animation software.)

Any thoughts???

TIA,
-K-

-Original Message-
From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On
Behalf Of Stephen Russell
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 10:02 AM

2009/9/30 Ricardo Aráoz ricar...@gmail.com:
 Stephen Russell wrote:
 2009/9/29 Ricardo Aráoz ricar...@gmail.com:
 An innovative marketing trick would be to ship a fully tested product,
 Doesn't everyone?  I don't consider security breeches untested.
 Sure, Micro$hit has NEVER EVER shipped an insufficiently tested product.
 And customers do NEVER EVER say wait till SP2 to buy it.
 I was having this same argument with Cinderella and the Easter Bunny
 last night.
-

I know that wait till SP1 is released and approved has been my mantra
with respect to PRODUCTION systems...


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/289ea162f5642645b5cf64d624c66a1405578...@us-ny-mail-002.waitex.net
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


[NF] Intuit QuickBase developer sought for side work

2009-10-02 Thread MB Software Solutions, LLC
Sylvan has a need for a QuickBase developer.  Rate is decent but not too 
many hours.  Contact me offline if interested.

-- 
Mike Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
President, Chief Software Architect
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
http://fabmate.com
http://twitter.com/mbabcock16


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4ac665b9.3090...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: How to get reference to selected control

2009-10-02 Thread henry.dagher
Sys(1270) ?
 

-Original Message-
From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On 
Behalf Of Paul McNett
Sent: October 2, 2009 4:53 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: How to get reference to selected control 

Ok I'm back at Fox to make a tweak to a legacy app, and I can't for the life of 
me remember how to get a reference to the currently selected control in the 
class designer from the command window. I want to get that reference and issue:

obj.Parent.saveAsClass(MyNewClass)

I used to do this all the time, but I can't remember now how I got the 
reference, and I can't seem to find it in the VFP help doc.

TIA!
Paul


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/ac8e1658bfca0b4f8661f250d64b7bed5ce...@nhev304.hrdc-drhc.net
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: How to get reference to selected control

2009-10-02 Thread Paul McNett
Paul McNett wrote:
 Ok I'm back at Fox to make a tweak to a legacy app, and I can't for the life 
 of me 
 remember how to get a reference to the currently selected control in the 
 class 
 designer from the command window. I want to get that reference and issue:
 
 obj.Parent.saveAsClass(MyNewClass)
 
 I used to do this all the time, but I can't remember now how I got the 
 reference, and 
 I can't seem to find it in the VFP help doc.

Of course, ASELOBJ()

Thanks anyway!
Paul



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4ac6693d.1000...@ulmcnett.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: Brought to you by the people who gave you IE

2009-10-02 Thread Gene Wirchenko
At 18:08 2009-10-01, Paul McNett p...@ulmcnett.com wrote:
Gene Wirchenko wrote:
Which is about what I said.  Apart from OSs, Microsoft is quite
  easily avoided.  For OSs, there is lock-in.

Excel isn't so easy to avoid, in the real world where all my clients 
use it and I
must automate it.

  Gleep!  I forgot about that.  I have a bit of Outlook 
automation in my system myself.

set friday on
  How about I just call it quits for a couple of days?

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/20091002210050.6722c98...@marge.leafe.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.