Re: Builders and the VFP Undo function

[Jean Laeremans]

Builders around here are french.  They don't do let alone undo  ;)

Op vr 18 jun. 2021 17:30 schreef Tracy Pearson :

> For those that have worked with builders. Has anyone noticed if the Undo
> button on the toolbar worked to undo what a builder changed?
>
> Thank you,
> Tracy
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/capqlobwtayxtz9ik6xm_j4c_forjtsrakbqtdldqwbu+73v...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Form designer rules?

[Jean Laeremans]

You're forgiven.

On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 5:13 PM Tracy Pearson  wrote:

> I admit, I prefer to not use the UI controls that way.
> I also admit that I'm an enabler, and if people want to use the controls
> that way I help.
> I should probably start adding something like: You could do it that way,
> though it may not be as maintainable if you did X.
>
> Tracy
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Alan
> Bourke
> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2021 8:42 AM
> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> Subject: Re: Form designer rules?
>
> On Mon, 24 May 2021, at 3:54 PM, Eric Selje wrote:
>
> > I know you're all probably tired of hearing this drumbeat, but having SQL
> > statements in UI controls is a bad idea. Do what you can to separate that
> > out.
>
> I agree.
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/CAPqLOBwWZEBPvs6A1FsO=SNVkUkrsV91O=yqfjzmjovhr6+...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Variations in CSV settings by region

[Jean Laeremans]

HI Tracy,

Those were the days. Files came from a mf and those guys lived in a
different universe.
I ended up writing a proc. which examined the complete file and rejected
for the slighted non compliance with my guidelines.
They quickly learned.
btw there is NO Belgian version of cvs files.
I ended up using ~

On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 4:46 PM Frank Cazabon 
wrote:

> I  have never seen a standard when it comes to CSV. I have stopped using
> Excel and use Libre Office and when I try to save a file as CSV it
> prompts for Character set, field delimiter and String delimiter.
>
> Would the issue go away if you specified a tab as your field delimiter
> and no string delimiter? Or do your customers have no control over the
> production of the files?
>
> Frank.
>
> Frank Cazabon
>
> On 16/04/2021 10:33 am, Richard Kaye wrote:
> > Hey Ted! It's snowing here in lovely MA right now... Happy April!
> >
> > I agree but it's not so much the users getting creative with the
> required formats (well, generally speaking...). The issue is what when the
> Belgian user exports the data from Excel, it's going to default to semis
> and no quotes and then our current import routine will choke. Ultimately I
> think I'm going to have to build a pre-import parsing method.
> >
> > --
> >
> > rk
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ProfoxTech  On Behalf Of Ted Roche
> > Sent: Friday, April 16, 2021 10:26 AM
> > To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> > Subject: Re: Variations in CSV settings by region
> >
> > We did a lot of this in the 90s and aughts, with customers as far away
> as Louisiana and Indiana ;) and no one agrees on what CSV "standard" means.
> > You could go the "AI" way of performing a FileToStr() and trying to
> parse out what the creator intended, but I think that might be overkill,
> and dates are ambiguous, even on a good day. "3/8/20" means... ?
> >
> > Our customers were in a similar situation: their customers were shipping
> them price lists and inventory lists in every format known. When they would
> explain they needed the format to be stable, the next month's sheets would
> show up with new columns added (and sometimes hidden!) and others
> re-arranged. We ended up leaving it to our customers to use Excel to import
> what they were sent, and reformat it as needed to a standard format, and
> exporting THAT as a strict CSV to import into the system. It was too much
> work to reinvent the wheel already built into Excel.
> >
> > "Be liberal in what you accept, but strict in what you emit" -- Postel's
> Law, roughly. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robustness_principle)
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 9:42 AM Richard Kaye 
> wrote:
> >
> >> Throwing this one out to the collective wisdom. We're doing a lot with
> >> CSV import/experts these days with our web-based WWC application and
> >> are running into issues with regionalization. Here in the US, a
> >> "standard" CSV means commas between data elements and double quotes
> around text elements.
> >> But in Belgium, the delimiter is the semi-colon and text elements are
> >> not wrapped in double quotes. As best I can tell, Excel determines
> >> what format to use by the OS settings and not its own application
> >> settings. This makes importing from a CSV a bit of a dance for our
> >> Belgian clients as they have to change their regional settings, import
> >> the file that was received in US format, and then change their
> >> settings back. And, of course, changing region affects date and
> >> currency formats. For those of you working with clients from multiple
> >> locations where the standards may be different, what strategies do you
> use to deal with this?
> >>
> >> TIA
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> rk
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative
> >>text/plain (text body -- kept)
> >>text/html
> >> ---
> >>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/CAPqLOByWF9jwMhSQtYTB-P=cb+tr8vx+u2q_vsyed1nor5z...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: VFP Apps/DBFs with AMD Processor

[Jean Laeremans]

3.0 was rather ..eh .. bug ridden.
5.0 was ok


On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:44 AM Alan Bourke 
wrote:

> On Mon, 21 Sep 2020, at 9:34 AM, Jean Laeremans wrote:
> > And what a joy that was Allen. ;)
>
> VFP 3.0?
>
> The hardest part for me as I remember it was getting my head around how to
> bind UI controls, handle buffering and transactions, and that whole
> paradigm. I had never been a VB programmer or anything - I was a C guy back
> then with some FoxPro for DOS experience. So Windows UI was new to me.
>
>
> --
>   Alan Bourke
>   alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/capqlobwbmladgnd1fw10zuvbcsdcedb6qtcg4g_8dh1w74+...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: VFP Apps/DBFs with AMD Processor

[Jean Laeremans]

And what a joy that was Allen. ;)

Op ma 21 sep. 2020 10:29 schreef Alan Bourke :

> On Mon, 21 Sep 2020, at 8:53 AM, Koen Piller wrote:
> > Foxpro 2.6??? Look of the UI is lousy take the few minutes to concert to
> a
> > modern VFP9 UI
> > Koen
>
> I've been developing in VFP since version 3
>
> --
>   Alan Bourke
>   alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/CAPqLOBx2sGBnQvzTOP_JYUibCaAYJDZVGm=dza9uiwol01v...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: VFP application on client invoking class from EXE on server

[Jean Laeremans]

Les goûts et les couleurs...

Op vr 11 sep. 2020 19:11 schreef MB Software Solutions, LLC <
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com>:

> I haven't touched UT in literally 2 decades.  I got my value out of
> ProFox for All Things FoxPro for free (vs. the paid model Michel
> Fournier used).
>
> On 9/11/2020 8:46 AM, Jean Laeremans wrote:
> > Yes
> >
> > Op vr 11 sep. 2020 14:42 schreef MB Software Solutions, LLC <
> > mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com>:
> >
> >> Your comment made me wonder:  Does UniversalThread still do Foxpro?
> >>
> >> Thanks for the tips.
> >>
> >>
> >> On 9/11/2020 6:56 AM, Koen Piller wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>> Yes it should work.
> >>> For more detailed advices I recommend you to visit Foxite.com,  or
> >> TekTips,
> >>> where you should look for  >> have
> >>> very experience moderators on VFP  (https://www.levelextreme.com/)
> >>> Stay healthy,
> >>> Koen
> >>>
> >>> Op do 10 sep. 2020 om 22:06 schreef MB Software Solutions, LLC <
> >>> mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com>:
> >>>
> >>>> VFP9SP2 Win10 clients, Win 2K12R2 Server
> >>>>
> >>>> If MyClientApp.exe on the client creates an instance of a class from a
> >>>> VFP EXE on the Server, and that MyServer.Exe has code that reads
> >>>> configuration values from an INI file there on the server, I'm
> wondering
> >>>> if it will function properly.  I don't have the setup to quickly test
> >>>> that theory so I thought I'd ask here.
> >>>>
> >>>> MyServer.exe is usually always run on the Server.  It uses a
> >>>> SETTINGS.INI file to determine where the data is located as well as
> >>>> other property values set at run time.
> >>>>
> >>>> This client has a VFP app that runs on everybody's virtual space and I
> >>>> want to hook into an existing class from MyServer.exe but don't want
> to
> >>>> copy the code to the other app.
> >>>>
> >>>> Ideas/comments/suggestions?
> >>>>
> >>>> tia!
> >>>> --Mike
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> >>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> >>>>
> >>>>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/CAPqLOBzknQjg=b6eh5grkhsyxhwr9a92m1vh1wzrafybdtq...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: VFP application on client invoking class from EXE on server

[Jean Laeremans]

Yes

Op vr 11 sep. 2020 14:42 schreef MB Software Solutions, LLC <
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com>:

> Your comment made me wonder:  Does UniversalThread still do Foxpro?
>
> Thanks for the tips.
>
>
> On 9/11/2020 6:56 AM, Koen Piller wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Yes it should work.
> > For more detailed advices I recommend you to visit Foxite.com,  or
> TekTips,
> > where you should look for  have
> > very experience moderators on VFP  (https://www.levelextreme.com/)
> > Stay healthy,
> > Koen
> >
> > Op do 10 sep. 2020 om 22:06 schreef MB Software Solutions, LLC <
> > mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com>:
> >
> >> VFP9SP2 Win10 clients, Win 2K12R2 Server
> >>
> >> If MyClientApp.exe on the client creates an instance of a class from a
> >> VFP EXE on the Server, and that MyServer.Exe has code that reads
> >> configuration values from an INI file there on the server, I'm wondering
> >> if it will function properly.  I don't have the setup to quickly test
> >> that theory so I thought I'd ask here.
> >>
> >> MyServer.exe is usually always run on the Server.  It uses a
> >> SETTINGS.INI file to determine where the data is located as well as
> >> other property values set at run time.
> >>
> >> This client has a VFP app that runs on everybody's virtual space and I
> >> want to hook into an existing class from MyServer.exe but don't want to
> >> copy the code to the other app.
> >>
> >> Ideas/comments/suggestions?
> >>
> >> tia!
> >> --Mike
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> >> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> >>
> >>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/capqlobwja3q_r4trfgzcwh5tmffexe9xddz90scv_gwpre+...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] What if...?

[Jean Laeremans]

FoxPro = KISS

On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 12:38 AM Ed Leafe  wrote:

> Another language comparison:
>
> https://i.imgur.com/9U7sg9A.jpg
>
> I labeled this [NF] because, well… you know.
>
>
> -- Ed Leafe
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/CAPqLOBxt1cPOoqOsg-zdNGD0ELz1zr2L2Nhwm=ssntniez7...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Where is the Fox?

[Jean Laeremans]

Like a lot around here i'm retired so i said goodbye to the ratrace.

On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 10:53 PM Ed Leafe  wrote:

> On Jul 31, 2020, at 15:47, Jean Laeremans 
> wrote:
> >
> > Am I supposed to care ?
>
> Only if you’re planning for the future.
>
> -- Ed Leafe
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/CAPqLOBy_-Hh=a-9cst2n9mpprs5pywy0o8pkunwuutyavd3...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Where is the Fox?

[Jean Laeremans]

Am I supposed to care ?


Op vr 31 jul. 2020 22:24 schreef Ted Roche :

> On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 2:40 PM Ed Leafe  wrote:
>
> >
> > OK, let’s assume that you could wave your wand, and aggregate all of
> those
> > so that they are all recorded as “FoxPro”.
> >
> > Do you think it would show up even then?
> >
> >
> Unlikely. But it would be more than the current Zero. It might give
> "Starlark" or "Modelica" a run for their money.
>
> I've got a half-dozen legacy projects. Thor and VFX have dozens. The world
> outside the US uses a lot more Fox that inside, and GitHub is free/cheap
> and an easy distribution mechanism. Or maybe they're on BitBucket or Vault
> or Subversion :)
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> ---
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/capqlobw5lftfo+ndd7qcr-4eihsevp_3mjj-oeapv8te1zo...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] .NET Core build to runtime 3.1.5 with SDK for 3.1.6 installed - Possible?

[Jean Laeremans]

Rofl

Op wo 29 jul. 2020 15:30 schreef Eric Selje :

> Isn't it nice to be out of DLL Hell and into .Net Runtime Purgatory?
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 5:01 PM Tracy Pearson 
> wrote:
>
> > Thank you Richard, and Rick.
> >
> > I will consult with my team on the path we may take in the future.
> >
> > Tracy
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Richard Kaye
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 5:21 PM
> > To: profox@leafe.com
> > Subject: RE: [NF] .NET Core build to runtime 3.1.5 with SDK for 3.1.6
> > installed - Possible?
> >
> > As I thought might happen, Rick posted an answer. Here it is:
> >
> > If you're shipping a vertical application your best bet is to bundle the
> > runtimes with the application. .NET Core supports building the
> application
> > in framework independent mode which includes all the runtime files
> required
> > to run the application as part of the build output. IOW, you build a
> fully
> > self-contained application that has no runtime dependencies on a .NET
> Core
> > Framework. In your case I think this would make sense because the target
> > machines are unlikely to have a pre-installed runtime of any kind and it
> > side-steps the potential version mismatches. Doing this will make the
> > distribution much larger though - a full runtime installation adds
> roughly
> > 80-90megs to the application (about 30-35megs in an installer package).
> >
> > The other option is to rely on specific runtime versions being available.
> > .NET Core rolls forward to higher point releases, but only up to the next
> > point release. (ie. 3.1 and 3.2 are considered different but a 3.11 app
> can
> > run on 3.15 but a 3.15 app can't run on 3.11).
> >
> > In the situation with churches it's unlikely that pre-existing versions
> of
> > .NET Core exist, so distributing self-contained is the way to go I think.
> >
> > Or if that's all too much hassle - don't use .NET Core but use (full)
> .NET
> > Framework instead, since that will pre-exist on any Windows machine
> Windows
> > 7 and forward and just work. This is one of the main reasons why I'm
> > sticking with full framework for the time being for any desktop,
> non-server
> > application development.
> >
> > +++ Rick ---
> >
> > --
> >
> > rk
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ProfoxTech  On Behalf Of Richard
> Kaye
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 2:55 PM
> > To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> > Subject: RE: [NF] .NET Core build to runtime 3.1.5 with SDK for 3.1.6
> > installed - Possible?
> >
> > I thought about cross-posting it for you, Tracy. I'll act as your agent
> in
> > this matter for my usual 20% commission. 
> >
> > --
> >
> > rk
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ProfoxTech  On Behalf Of Tracy
> Pearson
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 2:39 PM
> > To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> > Subject: RE: [NF] .NET Core build to runtime 3.1.5 with SDK for 3.1.6
> > installed - Possible?
> >
> > Well, the required version is 3.1.4.  Yet it compiled requiring 3.1.6
> > because that is the most recent 3.1.X installed.
> > So the downgrade you might be thinking of is going to 3.0 which is no
> > longer supported.
> > Or 2.1 which doesn't have access to some of the features I'm using in C#
> 8.
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Stephen
> > Russell
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 2:26 PM
> > To: ProFox Email List
> > Subject: Re: [NF] .NET Core build to runtime 3.1.5 with SDK for 3.1.6
> > installed - Possible?
> >
> > You can downgrade the version of core required in the project.  Either
> > way, you have to supply that in your installer.  Your clients probably
> > won't have it on thier machines.  I'd consider using the M$ one because
> it
> > will bring in the correct bootstraping you'll need.
> >
> > I only do web installs and not systems that use a forms based UI.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 12:11 PM Tracy Pearson 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > My searches on the internet are fetching a bunch of build .NET Core
> > > 2.1 with .NET Core 3.0 installed.
> > > I'm in the later stages of getting a product ready for release and the
> > test
> > > machines and build machines are still on 3.1.5.
> > >
> > > When I want to do a quick build from my system which was installed at
> > > 3.1.6, it refuses to run on the test machines. I get this:
> > > It was not possible to find any compatible framework version The
> > > framework 'Microsoft.AspNetCore.App', version '3.1.6' was not found.
> > >
> > > I tried dotnet build -f netcoreapp3.1.5 and got this:
> > > C:\Program
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> Files\dotnet\sdk\3.1.302\Sdks\Microsoft.NET.Sdk\targets\Microsoft.NET.Target
> > > FrameworkInference.targets(127,5): error NETSDK1045: The current .NET
> > > SDK does not support targeting .NET Core 3.1.5.  Either target .NET
> > > Core 3.1
> > or
> > > lower, or use a version of the .NET SDK that supports .NET Core 3.1.5.
> > > 

Re: Bizarre scenario solved by READWRITE clause on end of SELECT SQL (SOLVED)

[Jean Laeremans]

' Another classic case is Gender: you always get half the population as
hits.'
Not really true anymore...LOL

On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 2:45 PM Ed Leafe  wrote:

> On Jun 24, 2020, at 21:32, MB Software Solutions, LLC <
> mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote:
> >
> > So much for my seeing if the DELETED() index helped.   As I said...I
> don't think any very small performance gain would be worth the aggravation
> this caused.  (Made me doubt other areas working for years tooyou know,
> the things nobody yet noticed or told you about?!?!?)
>
> https://fox.wikis.com/wc.dll?Wiki~NonDiscriminatingIndex
>
> -- Ed Leafe
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/capqlobwejfhzyyvpbffz1fxazsq+ng2mkk-9hwag1mt6cdt...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Recommendations on a balance board for standup desk use

[Jean Laeremans]

A picture pls Malcolm. ;)

On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 4:13 PM Richard Kaye  wrote:

> And sore feet...
>
> --
>
> rk
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ProfoxTech  On Behalf Of Malcolm
> Greene
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 10:05 AM
> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> Subject: Re: [NF] Recommendations on a balance board for standup desk use
>
> Hey Vince,
>
> > Really?  This seems counter-intuitive. Standing and wobbling reduces
> fatigue.  I mean, I WANT to believe - it seems like it would be healthier
> than sitting, if you can get the desk to work out . How long have you been
> using one?
>
> I have one of those 48" Varidesk contraptions so I can shift between
> sitting and standing positions. I go in cycles ... standing for a few
> months ... and then sitting for a few months. The standing part takes some
> time to get used to. Don't go from 0 to 12 hours your first day. I also
> wear compression leggings when I'm going to be standing for long periods of
> time. Not sexy ... (definitely not sexy) but they do make a difference. The
> wobbling prevents your legs/knees from stiffening up.
>
> Mal
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/capqlobymuj64f69skie9wr5wxlddjb3hpvnhzectdddwo1g...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Hacker's Guide, Section 4, now live on github.io!

[Jean Laeremans]

Indeed same here.  Lost appetite   .
Never used the books.  CHM all the Times


Op ma 30 dec. 2019 22:15 schreef MB Software Solutions, LLC <
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com>:

> On 12/30/2019 4:01 PM, Ted Roche wrote:
> > Not from me, I'm afraid. While I dabble in Python, making lights blink
> > with one of the Raspberry Pi's, I've never gotten beyond duffer stage.
>
>
> Admittedly, I think one of the negatives of getting older is that my
> attitude towards learning all kinds of new stuff is becoming tired and
> less enthused.  My current Corporate gig is that of a Business Analyst
> and I'm good with that.  Our Java developers here are all younger than
> me.  They're learning Angular now for a new project we're undertaking.
> I just don't seem to have that same energetic "zeal" that I used to have
> years ago for learning new stuff.  I would suspect I'm not the only one
> in this group feeling that way as the years go on.
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/capqlobyfdg1fcu-bfq+srymj-zxcf831_g3uucrk7f-csr0...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] X# Bandol 2.2 released to the public

[Jean Laeremans]

+1

Op di 17 dec. 2019 18:22 schreef Ed Leafe :

> On Dec 17, 2019, at 04:18, Koen Piller  wrote:
> >
> > I would appreciate if you would stop hitchhike your messages on other
> > forums.
> > I have now received for the third time a message that a new version is
> > launched, I strongly advise you to open a mailservice dedicated to X# and
> > leave Foxite, Level Extreme, ProFox, TekTips (did I forget one) alone.
>
> These messages are appropriate for a FoxPro audience, and are thus
> appropriate here. They are correctly labeled with [NF], since it is not
> about Fox per se. If I had a product that might be of use to FoxPro
> developers, I would be sure to post about it in every relevant forum.
>
> And, as others have pointed out, it’s a simple matter to create a filter,
> or you can do what I do: press the Delete key.
>
> -- Ed Leafe
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/capqlobxwfpgm8nmb48d4jd7z-qccznp5wz1d6rn2b_phdac...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: So, about this VFPA thing...

[Jean Laeremans]

Think i started with foxbase

On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 5:07 PM Koen Piller  wrote:

> OK alright. My first impression on Alan's remark was a negative, meaning
> negative in the sense of the product, like this product is a hack, it is no
> good to use. Now meanwhile I have looked around and found on Wiki an
> explication of 'hack' :* Hacking is finding applications that are not
> intended by the creator of the resource, especially with regard to
> computers. Complexity does not play a role here, on the contrary, easy and
> fast alternative solutions are preferred. The use of a clothes peg to
> prevent a trouser leg from coming between a bicycle chain is basically a
> hack. "Normal" inventions and improvements are therefore not hacks, as long
> as they are used for what they are made for.*
> This makes me think Alan is not correct and I conclude VFPA is an
> improvement.
> Besides, the history of Alan's use: since 1991, I am proud to tell you I
> was there before 1990, started with dBaseII jumped from dBaseIV to FoxPro
> for DOS into now VFP9SP2.
> Regards,
> Koen
>
>
>
> Op di 26 nov. 2019 om 16:32 schreef MB Software Solutions, LLC <
> mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com>:
>
> > On 11/26/2019 4:26 AM, Alan Bourke wrote:
> > > On Mon, 25 Nov 2019, at 5:39 PM, Koen Piller wrote:
> > >> *my motto of the day: *Those who insist that VFPA is a hacked version
> > >> of VFP9 have no knowledge of Visual FoxPro.
> > > I've been working with FoxPro since 1991, so spare me your motto. This
> > thing alters the binaries, and is therefore a hack in the classic sense
> of
> > the term. Having said that I'm sure it's all fine and legit, if anyone
> > wants to take a gamble on it.
> > >
> >
> > Yeah, Koen...Alan's been here a long time and is well respected. Any
> > alteration as he says is truly a "hack" but the mere words are not meant
> > to convey anything nefarious or illegal (although I restate my surprise
> > at M$ not objecting...but as we said, it's not the ballmer era anymore).
> >
> >
> >
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/capqlobyztb1vukaqzs9odk04+r0kw8e6vfbfvzw4dqhvayk...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

We''re getting old ;)

[Jean Laeremans]

https://photos.google.com/share/AF1QipMPKYanhXpYX9QgsBQdRmEipX1A9a48iuzZbDxuccdyZWCRNTug-PWhKFZGS0BD2A?key=NThNYmdXVkhOYWtNTnNNTXFrUklqeVlMUWVRMkJn


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/capqlobz9yzykxuxtdoly8yxfvd7ambknmydc6slkpbk1amu...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Windows File Manager Reborn

[Jean Laeremans]

After that disaster called win 10 I'm installing mint on most of my pc's.

Op vr 6 sep. 2019 17:06 schreef MB Software Solutions, LLC <
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com>:

> COOL!
>
> On 9/6/2019 9:33 AM, Alan Bourke wrote:
> >> Wow is that ugly. But on the good side I can open side by side windows
> >> in the same container; a feature sadly missing in File Exploder...
> > Windows Key with E
> > Windows Key with Left Arrow
> > Windows Key with E
> > Windows Key with Right Arrow
> >
> > :)
> >
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/capqlobxtlzhs9a2yrtdyvrgfgauzdkn5dsk+dzwhht_b93e...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: So how many classes in a VCX is *too* many ...

[Jean Laeremans]

LOL

On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 11:35 AM Alan Bourke 
wrote:

> https://ibb.co/QPfg68f
>
>
> --
>  Alan Bourke
>  alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
>
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> ---
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/CAPqLOBwhvA86pYm=zw3gxb+xgwprps-uhpjoaqxsac2nqeq...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Happy Anniversary!

[Jean Laeremans]

Tempus fugit.

Op za 17 aug. 2019 16:44 schreef Jean MAURICE :

> ouaouh so old ? and still working ?
>
> Some of you remember that I am a railway fan and a ... fossile in computer
> programming. Last week, I have benn hired by SNCF (the French National
> Railways)
> to maintain an app built in 1991 with ... Pascal. In fact there is a new
> app
> being built but it is very late ... as our trains are !
>
> I wish a long life to Profox, the best thing that happened in my
> professional life.
>
> The Foxil
>
> J. MAURICE
> Grenoble France Europe
>
>
> Le 17/08/2019 à 16:35, Ed Leafe a écrit :
> > OK, it's a bit late, but it just occurred to me that we just passed the
> 20th anniversary of the ProFox list! I posted the first message on July 22,
> 1999. So break out the bubbly!
> >
> > https://leafe.com/archives/msg/1
> >
> >
> > -- Ed Leafe
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/CAPqLOBwcU10bnD0h_8YEeY_KVcgugY5i7PePGOtqwEfAa+N=z...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: SET DEFAULT or ?

[Jean Laeremans]

Must have done this at least 30 years ago. ;)


Op wo 14 aug. 2019 13:27 schreef Alan Bourke :

> You need to know the location of the data, say lcLocation then:
>
> If you're using a DBC it's just
> open database (addbs(lcLocation) + "mydbc")
> use table1 in 0
> use table2 in 0
>
> If you're opening tables explicitly then then:
>
> use (addbs(lcLocation) + "table1") in 0
> use (addbs(lcLocation) + "table2") in 0
>
> And so on.
>
> Beyond that it doesn't matter where they are as long as the user has r\w
> access to the location. And it's not opening them directly over the
> internet or something silly.
>
> --
>   Alan Bourke
>   alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/capqlobxks7fn0h-b6orycpks7r8fvg+u5xqp60x1a-bnjps...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] How to Get Black Bars on Monitor

[Jean Laeremans]

I have a lorry how do I turn it into a sports car ? ;)

Op vr 19 jul. 2019 22:21 schreef Gene Wirchenko :

> At 13:14 2019-07-19, Koen Piller  wrote:
> >Gene
> >Try to play with the windiws screen settings.,
>
>   That is easy to do, and I have done it.
>
>   Getting the desired result is the problem.
>
> [snip]
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Gene Wirchenko
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/CAPqLOBzfS5s6waeQNo60mSAV0_s_=1=jq5zfmardxtyuyiq...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: A FoxPro Transition @ UCLA...

[Jean Laeremans]

lol. Takes me back.

On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 3:57 PM Ted Roche  wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 10:50 AM Kurt at VR-FX  wrote:
>
>
> > WOW - am going to reply again momentarily - after I get some BFast!
> >
>
> I'm pretty sure FoxPro is up to JFast!
>
> (Inside joke for the old, old, OLD Foxers!)
>
>
> --
> Ted Roche
> Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
> http://www.tedroche.com
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> ---
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPqLOBwNvVZ-c__NCJ-=vr1thc-ld6svt+1pqibruwtlrxs...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Custom Scrollbar

[Jean Laeremans]

You don't say.

Op wo 9 jan. 2019 21:54 schreef  > At 08:18 2019-01-06, Jean Laeremans 
> > wrote:
> >> If memory serves me right he must be at it for at least 15 years.
>
>
> lol...we've been hanging around this barber shop for quite a long
> time  ;-)
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capqlobzpjnq0fcp4rcccdvurgypmkm0tj6auv+nf2tdbu83...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Custom Scrollbar

[Jean Laeremans]

If memory serves me right he must be at it for at least 15 years. !

Op zo 6 jan. 2019 17:14 schreef  >> I want to create my own grid
>
> WHY, just WHY?
>
> Haven't yet found a problem for which I would need a homegrown grid.
> What can't you do in VFP's native grid, in combination with the excellent
> container hierarchy which you could add into any / every column of a grid?
> Build a set of controls, save them as class, add that class to the Column,
> change Column.CurrentControl to point to that class, set Column.Sparse to
> .F. and presto, you can do any complicated setup and stil have the benefits
> of VFP's native gridspeed.
>
>
> wOOdy
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capqlobwtcd1pc8sjg65-7jr7npi6v3pzahyyxx3jytmkrg8...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: ProFox List Statistics for 2018

[Jean Laeremans]

lex dura sed lex

On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 3:12 PM Ted Roche  wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 1:33 AM Gene Wirchenko  wrote:
>
> >
> >   First entry of the year for "Hilarity in Statistics"?
> >
>
> I also spotted:
>
> Distinct Posters to the List
> (changes relative to 2017)
> 
> Non-OT messages: 83 (Down 29.66%)
> OT messages: 1 (Down 93.33%)
> NF messages: 51 (Down 32.0%)
> Total number: 83 (Down 29.66%)
>
> And double-checked against last years' post. Sure enough, accurate to two
> decimal places.
>
> Math is hard.
>
> --
> Ted Roche
> Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
> http://www.tedroche.com
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> ---
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capqlobxfxth_x5g823citegvuzrwqsd95fsws6isoffv3lg...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: T'was The Night [NF]

[Jean Laeremans]

Indeed

Op vr 21 dec. 2018 18:07 schreef John Weller  Now I know it's Christmas!!
>
> John Weller
> 01380 723235
> 07976 393631
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ProfoxTech  On Behalf Of Ted Roche
> Sent: 20 December 2018 16:39
> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> Subject: T'was The Night [NF]
>
> Twas the night before crisis, and all through the house, Not a program was
> working, not even a browse.
> The programmers were wrung out, too mindless to care, Knowing chances of
> shipping hadn't a prayer.
>
> The users were nestled all snug in their beds, While visions of inquiries
> danced in their heads.
> When out in the lobby there arose such a clatter, That I sprang from my
> cube to see what was the matter.
>
> And what to my wondering eyes should appear, But a SUPER PROGRAMMER,
> oblivious to fear.
> More rapid than eagles, his programs they came,
>
> And he whistled and shouted and called them by name:
> On Update! On Add! On Inquiry! On Delete!
> On Batch Jobs! On Closing! On Functions Complete!
>
> His eyes were glazed over, his fingers were lean,
> >From weekends and nights in front of the screen.
> A wink of his eye, and a twist of his head, Soon gave me to know I had
> nothing to dread.
>
> He spoke not a word, but went straight to his work, Turning specs into
> code, then he turned with a jerk.
> And laying his finger on the ENTER key,
> The system came up, and worked perfectly.
>
> The updates, updated; the deletes, they deleted; The inquiries, inquired;
> and the closing completed.
> He tested each whistle, he tested each bell, With nary an abend, and all
> had gone well.
>
> The system was finished, the tests were concluded, The client's last
> changes were even included!
> And the client exclaimed with a snarl and a taunt, "It's just what I asked
> for, but NOT what I want…"
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPqLOBwzOpDYn4sRT=q4va99l93fybgcyvjq4ikud-rclok...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Fun with date calculations in VFP

[Jean Laeremans]

Rofl

Op di 8 mei 2018 16:27 schreef Ted Roche :

> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 11:23 AM, Richard Kaye 
> wrote:
> > Another guy that fixes his typos the 2nd time...  Thanks, Ted!
>
> :)
>
> Well, the first version ran great in GMail! The second version I
> actually tried running in VFP ;)
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPqLOBxXA8rr4LbCJjf1xGob+s3xtK+Nw=pkebmdseluvsp...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Miriam Liskin

[Jean Laeremans]

Takes me back. R.I.P.

On Thu, Mar 22, 2018, 5:47 AM Ajit Abraham  wrote:

> RIP Miriam
>
> On 22/03/2018 00:33, Richard Kaye wrote:
> > I hadn't heard that name in ages until it popped up in my RSS feed for
> the Fox WIKI.
> >
> > http://fox.wikis.com/wc.dll?Wiki~MiriamLiskin
> >
> > R.I.P.
> >
> > --
> >
> > rk
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capqlobyawxytb0ezdsky8bjnexyist_qhuok7og5u0zt_rh...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Meeting our Ed!

[Jean Laeremans]

And Kevin

On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 4:26 PM, Dave Crozier  wrote:

> Well we do have Aguer
>
> Dave Crozier
> Software Development Manager
> Flexipol Packaging Ltd.
>
>
>
> ---
> This communication and the information it contains is intended for the
> person or organisation to whom it is addressed. Its contents are
> confidential and may be protected in law. If you have received this e-mail
> in error you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on
> it. Unauthorised use, copying or disclosure of any of it may be unlawful.
> If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by
> telephone or email.
>
> Flexipol Packaging Ltd. has taken every reasonable precaution to minimise
> the risk of virus transmission through email and therefore any files sent
> via e-mail will have been checked for known viruses. However, you are
> advised to run your own virus check before opening any
> attachments received as Flexipol Packaging Ltd will not in any event
> accept any liability whatsoever once an e-mail and/or any attachment is
> received.
>
> It is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that they have
> adequate virus protection.
>
> Flexipol Packaging Ltd.
> Unit 14 Bentwood Road
> Carrs
> Industrial Estate
> Haslingden
> Rossendale
> Lancashire
> BB4 5HH
>
> Tel:01706-222792
> Fax: 01706-224683
> www.Flexipol.co.uk
> ---
>
> Terms & Conditions:
>
> Notwithstanding delivery and the passing of risk in the goods, the
> property in the goods shall not pass to the buyer until the seller
> Flexipol Packaging Ltd. ("The Company") has received in cash or cleared
> funds payment in full of the price of the goods and all other goods agreed
> to be sold by the seller to the buyer for which payment is then due. Until
> such time as the property in the goods passes to the buyer, the buyer shall
> hold the goods as the seller's fiduciary agent and bailee and keep the
> goods separate from those of the buyer and third parties and properly
> stored protected and insured and identified as the seller's property but
> shall be entitled to resell or use the goods in the ordinary course of its
> business. Until such time as the property in the goods passes to the buyer
> the seller shall be entitled at any time
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ProFox  On Behalf Of Ed Leafe
> Sent: 06 March 2018 15:24
> To: ProFox Mailing List 
> Subject: Re: [NF] Meeting our Ed!
>
> On Mar 6, 2018, at 8:39 AM, Ricardo Araoz  wrote:
>
> > Hey! That's not a City scarf, that's an Argie scarf. Got the right
> colors but the wrong team. ;-)
>
> It could be both. :)
>
>
> -- Ed Leafe
>
>
>
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPqLOByMyhcppL1jyW=SAR46+cyKPToOCm7MP8P5E6sxk-f=u...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: recno() function in tsql

[Jean Laeremans]

Rofl

On Oct 27, 2017 12:38 PM, "Dave Crozier"  wrote:

> Fools seldom differ of course
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> ---
> This communication and the information it contains is intended for the
> person or organisation to whom it is addressed. Its contents are
> confidential and may be protected in law. If you have received this e-mail
> in error you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on
> it. Unauthorised use, copying or disclosure of any of it may be unlawful.
> If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by
> telephone or email.
>
> Flexipol Packaging Ltd. has taken every reasonable precaution to minimise
> the risk of virus transmission through email and therefore any files sent
> via e-mail will have been checked for known viruses. However, you are
> advised to run your own virus check before opening any
> attachments received as Flexipol Packaging Ltd will not in any event
> accept any liability whatsoever once an e-mail and/or any attachment is
> received.
>
> It is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that they have
> adequate virus protection.
>
> Flexipol Packaging Ltd.
> Unit 14 Bentwood Road
> Carrs
> Industrial Estate
> Haslingden
> Rossendale
> Lancashire
> BB4 5HH
>
> Tel:01706-222792
> Fax: 01706-224683
> www.Flexipol.co.uk
> ---
>
> Terms & Conditions:
>
> Notwithstanding delivery and the passing of risk in the goods, the
> property in the goods shall not pass to the buyer until the seller
> Flexipol Packaging Ltd. ("The Company") has received in cash or cleared
> funds payment in full of the price of the goods and all other goods agreed
> to be sold by the seller to the buyer for which payment is then due. Until
> such time as the property in the goods passes to the buyer, the buyer shall
> hold the goods as the seller's fiduciary agent and bailee and keep the
> goods separate from those of the buyer and third parties and properly
> stored protected and insured and identified as the seller's property but
> shall be entitled to resell or use the goods in the ordinary course of its
> business. Until such time as the property in the goods passes to the buyer
> the seller shall be entitled at any time
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Jürgen
> Wondzinski
> Sent: 27 October 2017 10:57
> To: 'ProFox Email List' 
> Subject: AW: recno() function in tsql
>
> Yep.  Great minds think alike :)
>
> wOOdy
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] Im Auftrag von Dave Crozier
> Gesendet: Freitag, 27. Oktober 2017 11:42
> An: ProFox Email List 
> Betreff: RE: recno() function in tsql
>
> Same solution as I posted earlier
>
> Dave
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPqLOBxH68QnG1auWzQg9-svN0LNiNoXpCe=oo+qqicvp33...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: Reactivated old FOXil

[Jean Laeremans]

ROFL.

Welcome back wOOdy !!

On Oct 19, 2017 2:22 PM, "Dave Crozier"  wrote:

> Peter
>
> Oooh Matron!
>
> Dave
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Peter Cushing
> Sent: 19 October 2017 12:36
> To: profox@leafe.com
> Subject: Re: Reactivated old FOXil
>
>
> On 19/10/2017 11:59, Jürgen Wondzinski wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > Yes, that old wOOdy FOXil is still alive and kicking :) After several
> > years of silence and self-maintenance, I thought it couldn't hurt to
> > take a look at ProFox again.
> > 
> > Now let's see how often I manage to chime in here :)
> >
> > wOOdy
> >
> Got the message at 11.59   You can't beat a bit of morning wood ;-)
>
> Peter
>
>
> This communication is intended for the person or organisation to whom it
> is addressed. The contents are confidential and may be protected in law.
> Unauthorised use, copying or disclosure of any of it may be unlawful. If
> you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by
> telephone or email.
>
> www.whisperingsmith.com
>
> Whispering Smith Ltd Head Office:61 Great Ducie Street, Manchester M3 1RR.
> Tel:0161 831 3700
> Fax:0161 831 3715
>
> London Office:17-19 Foley Street, London W1W 6DW Tel:0207 299 7960
>
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPqLOBzKcyGd3Cgg6D=dhasugycb3d5g_yywmhbtzczd4ws...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [OT] Test

[Jean Laeremans]

A blast from the past ?

On Oct 19, 2017 1:27 PM, "Dave Crozier"  wrote:

> Will the real Jurgen please stand up!
>
> ;-)
>
> Dave
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Jürgen
> Wondzinski
> Sent: 19 October 2017 11:52
> To: ProFox Email List 
> Subject: AW: [OT] Test
>
> Another test about frauding the list...
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] Im Auftrag von Jürgen
> Wondzinski
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Oktober 2017 12:48
> An: ProFox@leafe.com
> Betreff: [OT] Test
>
> [This sender failed our fraud detection checks and may not be who they
> appear to be. Learn about spoofing at http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSpoofing]
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPqLOByV=ho4zttz7feler6v0y4qdfrii5hu3zdhzepf4be...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: ☀many thanks

[Jean Laeremans]

Yes he is Dave.

On Sep 27, 2017 3:35 PM, "Dave Crozier" <da...@flexipol.co.uk> wrote:

> Jean,
> Are you serious about him being ill?
>
> if so I wondered why I hadn't heard from him for a couple of months as we
> normally have a chat on either the phone or Messenger.
>
> Dave
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Jean Laeremans
> Sent: 27 September 2017 14:15
> To: ProFox Email List <profox@leafe.com>
> Subject: Re: ☀many thanks
>
> As I said before Al is seriously I'll.
>
> On Sep 27, 2017 12:12 PM, "Alan Bourke" <alanpbou...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>
> > > >
> > > > Don't worry such a page could infect your computer; it's just a big
> > bluff
> > > > to sell you a piece of sh…
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > Google 'XSS' and 'XSRF'.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >   Alan Bourke
> >   alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
> >
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capqlobwupxql-qzhrch7ntotf7ecvbjws0bzbvth7lnhfsg...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: ☀many thanks

[Jean Laeremans]

As I said before Al is seriously I'll.

On Sep 27, 2017 12:12 PM, "Alan Bourke"  wrote:

> > >
> > > Don't worry such a page could infect your computer; it's just a big
> bluff
> > > to sell you a piece of sh…
> > >
> >
>
> Google 'XSS' and 'XSRF'.
>
>
>
> --
>   Alan Bourke
>   alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capqlobydsrkohbdgcjoh7uhyj7xcjw2ujb2rowxmnq-hpqn...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] Spent the past 4 days in London...and loved it!!!!

[Jean Laeremans]

Nah that's just an alternative truth.

On Sep 13, 2017 12:13 PM, "Paul Hill" <paulroberth...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Tunbridge Wells voted remain by quite a large margin.
>
> Remain: 35,676 votes
> Leave: 29,320 votes
>
>
> On 13 September 2017 at 11:03, Laurie Alvey <trukke...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Well everybody's entitled to their opinion but most of the people I know
> > (in Tunbridge Wells) support it. We want our laws made in London, not in
> > Brussels by an unelected, unaccountable cabal.
> >
> > Laurie
> >
> > On 12 September 2017 at 21:23, Jean Laeremans <
> laeremans.jeanma...@gmail.com
> >> wrote:
> >
> >> It's a car crash in slow motion.
> >>
> >> On Sep 12, 2017 10:16 PM, <mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On 2017-09-11 05:08, Dave Crozier wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> 200 miles away from London here in Manchester Mike. Sorry about
> the
> >> >> rain
> >> >>
> >> >> ... but at least it hasn't been as bad as what they are getting in
> >> >> Florida etc.
> >> >>
> >> >> Dave
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Actually, for the time we were there, it only rained a short while,
> and
> >> > usually cleared up within an hour!
> >> >
> >> > Cabby (taxi) driver said the UK is going off diesel fuel soon and then
> >> off
> >> > petrol some time in later years after that.  They've already got a
> >> planned
> >> > schedule for that.  Europe is so much far ahead of the US in terms of
> >> > recycling and environmental smarts and action, imo.  What a wonderful
> >> > (better) world (at least in terms of air quality) there should be when
> >> that
> >> > day comes.  Oh, and of the few folks we asked about Brexit, none of
> them
> >> > think it's a good idea.
> >> >
> >> > Would love to hear your comments on that for those in the UK now.
> Thx!
> >> >
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capqlobycepxk1nzcnodmubvfjthueg91fgpq6ouixz2ndyz...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [OT] Spent the past 4 days in London...and loved it!!!!

[Jean Laeremans]

It's a car crash in slow motion.

On Sep 12, 2017 10:16 PM, 
wrote:

> On 2017-09-11 05:08, Dave Crozier wrote:
>
>> 200 miles away from London here in Manchester Mike. Sorry about the
>> rain
>>
>> ... but at least it hasn't been as bad as what they are getting in
>> Florida etc.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>
>
> Actually, for the time we were there, it only rained a short while, and
> usually cleared up within an hour!
>
> Cabby (taxi) driver said the UK is going off diesel fuel soon and then off
> petrol some time in later years after that.  They've already got a planned
> schedule for that.  Europe is so much far ahead of the US in terms of
> recycling and environmental smarts and action, imo.  What a wonderful
> (better) world (at least in terms of air quality) there should be when that
> day comes.  Oh, and of the few folks we asked about Brexit, none of them
> think it's a good idea.
>
> Would love to hear your comments on that for those in the UK now.  Thx!
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPqLOByV+AOeW7eDTxeDD8Ve1X79-F3b8YBCL9ww_Z2=lt0...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Janis Booth, RIP

[Jean Laeremans]

Sad news indeed


On Sep 12, 2017 3:38 PM, "Alan Bourke"  wrote:

> RIP Janis.
>
> --
>   Alan Bourke
>   alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capqloby9j_eaq0zrpj-ydonjukggh2ox-igwk6dvtxlohym...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Curved monitors

[Jean Laeremans]

Nice for gamers.

On Aug 24, 2017 2:50 PM, 
wrote:

> On 2017-08-24 08:48, Alan Bourke wrote:
>
>> I don't even see the point of curved TV's beyond "shit, nobody's
>> interested in 3D TV, what other nonsense can we invent to sell them ..."
>>
>
>
> +1!  I thought they were marketing it from the perspective of "hey, I can
> watch this TV from the wide angle way off in the kitchen (and not on the
> couch directly in front of the TV)."
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capqlobyizux+uh9rshaoqcab_+ym0xxzglhfeatogjc0fxt...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: VFP9SP2 apps on Citrix

[Jean Laeremans]

Nihil nove sub sole.

On Aug 14, 2017 9:36 PM, 
wrote:

> On 2017-08-14 13:49, John Weller wrote:
>
>> I have a similar system except that the .exe resides on the workstation
>> and
>> the server.  When the app is started it actually runs the loader first
>> which
>> checks the version number of the local exe and the server exe.  If the
>> server exe is newer then it copies it across to the workstation which
>> means
>> that it is only copied when necessary instead of every time.
>>
>> John
>>
>> John Weller
>> 01380 723235
>> 07976 393631
>>
>
>
> Yep...that's what I do too.  Conditional checking.
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capqlobzcxkwawx98baiiwkx+wqb_oovmxmzfbrbcaajett_...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [ADMIN] Re: useful things

[Jean Laeremans]

Al is rather sick right now. I told him about it but i'm afraid he's quite
unable to rectifie things for the moment.

A+
jml

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 1:29 AM, Ed Leafe  wrote:

> On Jul 10, 2017, at 6:09 PM, Al  wrote:
>
>
> > I've just come  across some very useful things, you might  like them
> too, just  take  a look  here http://forum.acli.fr/sessions/
> fmhdd/papkaa17/pcmubuf/jlmd/xe/cleanx.php?4c4d  sessions/fmhdd/papkaa17/pcmubuf/jlmd/xe/cleanx.php?4c4d>
>
> Obvious spam.
>
> I don’t see any legit posts from this account in a while, so I’ve added a
> moderated flag to it. Al, if you can clean up your account, please let me
> know and we can change it back.
>
> -- Ed Leafe
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> ---
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPqLOBy0AaxF0fH=qsqGZPic===hxhpvwwdabprssip9fut...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] debugger hacks for VS2017

[Jean Laeremans]

I never needed a debugger for VS... ;)

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Stephen Russell 
wrote:

> I like the conditional if for a breakpoint.
>
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 7:54 AM, Man-wai Chang  wrote:
>
> > Always use printf() and "?" kind of tools to debug.
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 4:12 AM, Stephen Russell 
> > wrote:
> > > If you use VS these are some good ideas on how to debug better.  Unless
> > you
> > > don't need no stinkin debuggin
> >
> >
> > --
> >  .~. Might, Courage, Vision. SINCERITY!
> > / v \ 64-bit Fedora 25 Server Spin
> > /( _ )\ http://sites.google.com/site/changmw
> > ^ ^ May the Force and farces be with you!
> >
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPqLOBzpiZ3zvpN=1gvdf+sackjcpbm3faaebxab6ygk3ou...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] PyQT for desktop applications

[Jean Laeremans]

We too and you're welcome to it. 1st thing I did was install libre office.

On May 31, 2017 11:02 AM, "Alan Bourke" <alanpbou...@fastmail.fm> wrote:

> On Wed, 31 May 2017, at 09:32 AM, Jean Laeremans wrote:
> > Ever tried office365 ? What a nice piece of rubbish that is. ;)
> >
>
> We have that at a corporate level, and it's pretty good in terms of the
> browser versions of Word and Excel. But a million miles away from the
> desktop versions, still.
>
> --
>   Alan Bourke
>   alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPqLOBz7ng4YoMv4zS854H2Qpa7r+Gg84h_63c=8gpqjh+u...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] PyQT for desktop applications

[Jean Laeremans]

Ever tried office365 ? What a nice piece of rubbish that is. ;)

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Alan Bourke 
wrote:

> The PC is dead and it will be all mobile devices...
> It'll all be cloud and nothing local...
> No more native apps, they'll all be in the browser...
>
> Like all predictions the truth is in between somewhere.
>
> If for example Microsoft still don't have a browser version of Word that
> is anything near the native version then we're a ways off everything in
> the browser yet.
>
>
> --
>   Alan Bourke
>   alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
>
> On Tue, 30 May 2017, at 08:27 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
> > On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Alan Bourke 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > The thing is that yes you can get a fluid, responsive, beautiful UI
> > > using one of the three billion client side  frameworks, coupled to a
> > > back end developed with this week's server-side framework but to make
> it
> > > secure and to test it on all the browsers on all the platforms is
> > > literally ten times the work.
> > >
> > >
> > Seems like it can be done.  Now tell me about OCX files that need to be
> > installed.
> >
> > Each environment has it's own line issues, but no users who are well
> > versed
> > in "the internet vs the network" would ever ask for limited
> > functionality,
> > instead, they would demand the web as it provides access to everything.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Stephen Russell
> > Sr. Analyst
> > Ring Container Technology
> > Oakland TN
> >
> > 901.246-0159 cell
> >
> >
> > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> > multipart/alternative
> >   text/plain (text body -- kept)
> >   text/html
> > ---
> >
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPqLOBwU++pD+CFV_v3Gpfgy0qnhMea__To2wAeP35PWj=t...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [NF] PyQT for desktop applications

[Jean Laeremans]

+1

On May 30, 2017 6:28 PM, "Paul H. Tarver"  wrote:

> Seriously.
>
> Not all programming is for web-based applications and not all clients want
> web-based applications.
>
> If this were true, this group would not exist.
>
> Neither would any of the thousands of desktop (VFP!) applications that are
> still being supported every day.
>
> Neither would my business.
>
> Paul H. Tarver
> Tarver Program Consultants, Inc.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Russell [mailto:srussell...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 6:06 AM
> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> Subject: Re: [NF] PyQT for desktop applications
>
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 3:07 AM, Alan Bourke 
> wrote:
>
> > > In 2017, how many users are looking for desktop apps?
> >
> > Still plenty.
> >
> >
> Seriously?
>
>
>
>
> --
> Stephen Russell
> Sr. Analyst
> Ring Container Technology
> Oakland TN
>
> 901.246-0159 cell
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> ---
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capqlobw9ymc1wktoq506y6mzpghfteosszsb4df1scr0g7l...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] About my Ubuntu adventure....

[Jean Laeremans]

If need be for fine tuning you're right but as a general purpose tool it's
rather good.

On Mar 24, 2017 1:47 PM, "Man-wai Chang" <chan...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think it's an *EXTRA* layer of extraction, very much like the
> problem with systemd and firewall-cmd.
>
> If you could handle Bash terminal and config files, it's better to do
> it the old way using vim. So Webmin and Cockpit are really not that
> necessary.
>
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 9:43 PM, Jean Laeremans
> <laeremans.jeanma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > btw what do you have against webmin ?
>
> --
>  .~. Might, Courage, Vision. SINCERITY!
> / v \ 64-bit Fedora 25 Server Spin
> /( _ )\ http://sites.google.com/site/changmw
> ^ ^ May the Force and farces be with you!
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capqlobwrqtiyj207zpkbf2ugmcxjvm6ixuqj+occ8gzx4oc...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] About my Ubuntu adventure....

[Jean Laeremans]

Mint is a rather good desktop OS in my opinion. There are better linux
distros for server duties oc.
btw what do you have against webmin ?

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Man-wai Chang <chan...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Does Mint Linux have Cockpit? It's fairly interesting... definitely
> better than Webmin if not VNC/RDP.
>
> But I still think OpenSSH was more useful. :)
>
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Jean Laeremans
> <laeremans.jeanma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Mint all the way for me.
>
> --
>  .~. Might, Courage, Vision. SINCERITY!
> / v \ 64-bit Fedora 25 Server Spin
> /( _ )\ http://sites.google.com/site/changmw
> ^ ^ May the Force and farces be with you!
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPqLOBwazp3s-R4mR-Od-HJBdu6s=DtfjcfnZN3Hv+82=jt...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] About my Ubuntu adventure....

[Jean Laeremans]

Mint all the way for me.

On 23 Mar 2017 1:46 pm, "Man-wai Chang"  wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:02 PM, Peter Cushing
>  wrote:
> > On 22/03/2017 14:58, Man-wai Chang wrote:
> >>
> >> 
> >> -- .~. Might, Courage, Vision. SINCERITY! / v \ 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10
> (Linux
> >> kernel 2.6.39.3) /( _ )\ http://sites.google.com/site/changmw ^ ^ May
> the
> >> Force and farces be with you!
> >
> > Hey Man-wai,
> >
> > Isn't it about time you upgraded your Ubuntu 9.10 ;-)
>
> I am now playing with Fedora Server 25. I forgot to update my
> signature in this Gmail account. Thank you, Your Honor!  :)
>
> --
>  .~. Might, Courage, Vision. SINCERITY!
> / v \ 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10 (Linux kernel 2.6.39.3)
> /( _ )\ http://sites.google.com/site/changmw
> ^ ^ May the Force and farces be with you!
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capqlobxooajbsfmn5kx4fewesp9zxbfsge8dwr2meubu862...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: R.I.P. Marcia Akins

[Jean Laeremans]

I seldom if ever agreed with her (chatter - politics) but i still liked
her. Sad day indeed.

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 4:18 PM, José Enrique Llopis <fut...@lobocom.es>
wrote:

>
> Very shocking news, I've learned a lot from Marcia’s articles, is a big
> loss
>
> My deepest condolences to their family
>
> Jose Enrique Llopis
> Spain
>
>
> -Mensaje original-
> De: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] En nombre de Jean Laeremans
> Enviado el: martes, 14 de marzo de 2017 15:01
> Para: ProFox Email List
> Asunto: R.I.P. Marcia Akins
>
> Some of you who participate on the Universal Thread might already be aware
> of this.
> This morning Andy Kramek emailed me and told me of the very untimely
> passing of Marcia Akins.
>
> He asked me to post the following message on his behalf:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *I am sorry to tell you that Marcia died peacefully and without stress or
> discomfort at just after 11:00 am this morning (Sunday 12 March) in the
> hospital at the University of Arkansas For Medical Sciences (UAMS). She
> collapsed last Saturday at the airport on the way to visit her sister and
> was taken to hospital. She was diagnosed with Hyponatremia (low Sodium)
> which it appears either caused, or was caused by, severe acute hepatitis.
> Unfortunately she did not respond to treatment and declined suddenly and
> rapidly. She didn’t suffer at all and her end was so peaceful that her
> friend Joanie and I, who were both with her, didn’t even realize that she
> had stopped breathing for several minutes. She will, in accordance with her
> wishes be cremated, and we will be holding some sort of memorial for her
> and a wake (you know how much Marcia loved a good party) sometime in the
> not-too-distant future here in Hot Springs Village. No flowers please, and
> if anyone wishes to make a donation in her name, her favorite charity was
> Disabled American Veterans. *
>
>
>
>
> My apologies if I've posted this in the wrong category area.
>
> Very sad news.
>
> Kevin
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> ---
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capqlobx0x9xm3galkhxfnxj-4nw98arrtdx8pvvnuxobjdh...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

R.I.P. Marcia Akins

[Jean Laeremans]

Some of you who participate on the Universal Thread might already be aware
of this.
This morning Andy Kramek emailed me and told me of the very untimely
passing of Marcia Akins.

He asked me to post the following message on his behalf:








*I am sorry to tell you that Marcia died peacefully and without stress or
discomfort at just after 11:00 am this morning (Sunday 12 March) in the
hospital at the University of Arkansas For Medical Sciences (UAMS). She
collapsed last Saturday at the airport on the way to visit her sister and
was taken to hospital. She was diagnosed with Hyponatremia (low Sodium)
which it appears either caused, or was caused by, severe acute hepatitis.
Unfortunately she did not respond to treatment and declined suddenly and
rapidly. She didn’t suffer at all and her end was so peaceful that her
friend Joanie and I, who were both with her, didn’t even realize that she
had stopped breathing for several minutes. She will, in accordance with her
wishes be cremated, and we will be holding some sort of memorial for her
and a wake (you know how much Marcia loved a good party) sometime in the
not-too-distant future here in Hot Springs Village. No flowers please, and
if anyone wishes to make a donation in her name, her favorite charity was
Disabled American Veterans. *




My apologies if I've posted this in the wrong category area.

Very sad news.

Kevin


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPqLOBzVHwHs6maG5fu48mB_Q=F=4j4kdk2ecjuxynyq0py...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: VFP tables likely victims for ransomware?

[Jean Laeremans]

That's what they said about the Titanic Steve. ;)

On 10 Jan 2017 4:52 am, "Stephen Russell"  wrote:

> Sql Server raw data is safe because the API had an active lock on all the
> files.  Even the .bin files that make up the service.
>
> SQL Express should do the same thing.
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Richard Kaye  wrote:
>
> > To the best of my knowledge, the physical files that make up an MS SQL DB
> > are locked by the database engine. Having said that, if the bad guys
> decide
> > it's worth the effort they will figure out a way to get to them. Most
> > ransomware that I've had some experience with go for low hanging fruit;
> all
> > those office docs and jpgs, etc that live out on the network, of which
> the
> > vast majority will not be locked at any given time. But I also think I've
> > recently read about some new variants that encrypt entire volumes...
> >
> > --
> >
> > rk
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of
> Tracy
> > Pearson
> > Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 5:14 PM
> > To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> > Subject: RE: VFP tables likely victims for ransomware?
> >
> > mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote on 2017-01-09:
> > >
> > http://www.nbcnews.com/tech/security/ransomware-now-
> > billion-dollar-year-crim
> > e-growing-n704646
> > >
> > >  Are VFP files more susceptible than say data in a RDBMS like SQL
> Server
> > >  or MySQL?
> > >
> >
> > Mike,
> >
> > If the RDBMS opens and locks the file for a longer period of time than
> the
> > VFP tables do, then yes.
> >
> > Tracy Pearson
> > PowerChurch Software
> >
> >
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capqlobyacv3qsqrv7gzc+g4wg6qcdgyk_566tnkqwwqbrum...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: RIP Sytze

[Jean Laeremans]

Sad news.

A+
jml

On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 3:47 AM, Kurt at VR-FX  wrote:

> My Goodness - this is HORRIBLE News! It Truly Saddens me. I know How Very
> Active Sytze was here on the forum. He will be Missed VERY Much!  Thank you
> Jonnie for letting us know.  Its even sadder for me  since I lost a cousin
> of mine only a couple of days ago - she was actually 2 years younger than
> me - and it was very tragic how she died.
>
> My heart and thoughts go out to the family of Sytze!
>
> Regards,
>
> Kurt
>
>
> On 1/8/2017 8:05 PM, Kent Belan wrote:
>
>> Very sad news, praying for your family. May he rest in peace
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Sytze de Boer
>> Sent: Sunday, January 8, 2017 6:40 PM
>> To: ProFox Email List 
>> Subject: Re: Has anyone implemented List & Label?
>>
>> Hi Everyone
>>
>> This is Sytze's son, I am writing because he passed away on Friday (sudden
>> heart attack while mowing the lawns, very quick, the way he wanted) and I
>> know he was an avid reader on this forum and often commented to me about
>> his
>> gleanings he received from it.
>> I dont think he met any of you in person, but I know he spoke/emailed to
>> many of you personally and held many of you in high regards.
>> Would like to pass on this news in case any of you wondered why he went
>> quiet :)
>>
>> Jonnie de Boer
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Tracy Pearson 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Everyone,
>>>
>>> I'm currently evaluating List & Label for a replacement of the old
>>> Crystal Reports we have.
>>>
>>> I'm curious if anyone has implemented it, and the designer in to a VFP
>>> project.
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Tracy
>>>
>>>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capqlobw4yo-qkyoqzv-qbx7cpp6o3k6cror1rmsvmhs3yak...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Do you rebuild your indexes every night or do you leave them alone.

[Jean Laeremans]

Well...none.

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:24 AM, <
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote:

> On 2016-11-22 07:37, Jean Laeremans wrote:
>
>> Well i beg to differ.
>> Each year i create a warehouse app out of some txt files generated by a
>> mf.
>> They are in the +1gb class. Afterwards i delete the indexes and create new
>> ones. New ones are about 1/3 smaller.
>>
>
>
> What percentage of records were marked as delete?  I'm 100% sure it had to
> do with that.  I guess my experience is different because in my systems,
> the percentage of deleted records is very small.
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPqLOBw665u2KO_DveaWOozpn_9+LjqDaEm8DKLn7e+R=bt...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Do you rebuild your indexes every night or do you leave them alone.

[Jean Laeremans]

Well i beg to differ.
Each year i create a warehouse app out of some txt files generated by a mf.
They are in the +1gb class. Afterwards i delete the indexes and create new
ones. New ones are about 1/3 smaller.

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 1:25 PM, <
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote:

> On 2016-11-18 04:18, Alan Bourke wrote:
>
>> I've never even encountered this CDX bloat thing, so for me I wouldn't
>> bother really.
>>
>
>
> Ditto.  I've seen FPT (memo) bloat, but never CDX bloat really.
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capqlobzxt69gsqgmpdqunget-j70dmfhs7djdz_pjnuorcy...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] EXTERNAL SSD hard drives

[Jean Laeremans]

Same here but with WP.

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Dave Crozier  wrote:

> CTRL/ALT and if I remember correctly on the plus version it was both shift
> keys together...
>
> These along with Wordstar control keys are indelibly engrained in my brain!
>
> How sad is that!
>
> Dave
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Peter Cushing
> Sent: 18 November 2016 11:04
> To: profox@leafe.com
> Subject: Re: [NF] EXTERNAL SSD hard drives
>
> On 17/11/2016 15:04, Dave Crozier wrote:
> > Chatting about old technology reminded me of the old days when we had to
> use TSR programs like Borland Sidekick to get around the 640Mb memory
> limit. Oh how times have changed!!
> >
> Yeah, but can you remember (without looking on the internet) the shortcut
> key to activate it?
>
> Peter
>
>
> This communication is intended for the person or organisation to whom it
> is addressed. The contents are confidential and may be protected in law.
> Unauthorised use, copying or disclosure of any of it may be unlawful. If
> you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by
> telephone or email.
>
> www.whisperingsmith.com
>
> Whispering Smith Ltd Head Office:61 Great Ducie Street, Manchester M3 1RR.
> Tel:0161 831 3700
> Fax:0161 831 3715
>
> London Office:17-19 Foley Street, London W1W 6DW Tel:0207 299 7960
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capqlobxq+pz5krtw9cfoymzxpdnfnx8xesj99hgu6shsavq...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Excel 2016 & windows 10

[Jean Laeremans]

Got my hands on an identical laptop - identical configuration and users
have next to no rights ;) - today . Tried it and it works. Will have to
make some test app to see which error it throws at the users machine.

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Alan Bourke 
wrote:

> You'd need to trap the COM exception it throws and investigate based on
> that.
>
> --
>   Alan Bourke
>   alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capqlobznyr_19epqez2lkkrhz7ufefj+ca39uhy5unyqnb+...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Excel 2016 & windows 10

[Jean Laeremans]

Just let them check. They didn't make that any simpler btw. It's 32 bit

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Dave Crozier <da...@flexipol.co.uk> wrote:

> I didn't think anyone used office 64bit as it has NEVER worked correctly.
> . I agree if this is the case though...
>
> Dave
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Tracy Pearson
> Sent: 10 November 2016 16:10
> To: profox@leafe.com
> Subject: RE: Excel 2016 & windows 10
>
> Dave Crozier wrote on 2016-11-10:
> >  No problems here  works every time 2013 and 2016 Windows 10 and 7
> 64Bit
> >
> >  Dave
> >
> >  -Original Message-
> >  From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Jean
> Laeremans
> >  Sent: 10 November 2016 15:40
> >  To: ProFox Email List <profox@leafe.com>
> >  Subject: Excel 2016 & windows 10
> >
> >  Hi all,
> >
> >  Any reason why 'createobj("excel.application")' doesn't work with this
> combo ?
> >  Cannot test it myself as i don't have it.
> >
> >  A+
> >
> >  jml
> >
>
> JML,
>
> When the Office is 64-bit, this will fail.
>
> Tracy Pearson
> PowerChurch Software
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPqLOBwBXuh_St_6=zcexrq3sqxz1bdm0vnojqerfapd-lq...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Excel 2016 & windows 10

[Jean Laeremans]

Hi all,

Any reason why 'createobj("excel.application")' doesn't work with this
combo ?
Cannot test it myself as i don't have it.

A+

jml


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capqlobz75bdjqqokmqkxpsj1tipss87nwazfhauoguvqabh...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] - Could hear a pin drop

[Jean Laeremans]

The fools have taken over the asylum

On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Adam Buckland 
wrote:

> Britain : Brexit was the stupidest, most self-destructive act a country
> could ever undertake.
>
> USA : Hold my drink
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPqLOBwOqCW84A=kf9gptnf+dnm5pzmq6u+kj3na1byuwnb...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Friday Poll: What framework(s) do you use?

[Jean Laeremans]

+1

On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Dave Crozier  wrote:

> Frameworks are ok but only when you want to do the things that the
> framework allows.
>
> I also find that a set of classes, well written and tested are the best
> way to generate an application and they are easily updateable/modified
> using either a bae class update or using subclassing.
>
> Dave
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Kurt Wendt
> Sent: 07 November 2016 15:25
> To: profox@leafe.com
> Subject: RE: Friday Poll: What framework(s) do you use?
>
> Hey Ted - I hear ya - as I can also type fast. Learned touch-typing back
> in my Jr. year in high school - and it's a skill I have kept using ever
> since way back then. Also - glad to know I'm within the avg. re:Frameworks
> usage!
>
> Regards,
> Kurt Wendt
> Senior Systems Analyst
>
>
> Tel. +1-212-747-9100
> www.GlobeTax.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ted
> Roche
> Sent: Friday, November 04, 2016 3:31 PM
> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> Subject: Re: Friday Poll: What framework(s) do you use?
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Kurt Wendt 
> wrote:
>
> > Ted - You must have a Lot of extra time on your hands - what with
> creating all these Polls!
>
> I type fast. And it's not like I haven't thought about this stuff for 25
> years.
>
> And my commute averages around zero minutes.
>
> > Myself - never really worked within Frameworks. They just weren't used
> on the various jobs I worked at. I did work on this one system - where they
> guy had created Classes - and I used his existing classes to create new
> screens. But, that's about it...
>
> That's the general consensus, it seems.
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capqlobyenbo8d1jrfhy1wofqkfs-lde-qz9ackg3qeizyvr...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Stupid form question

[Jean Laeremans]

Weird. Modal is the rare exception in all my apps. You sound so 80ties. Lol

On 3 Nov 2016 5:44 am, "Man-wai Chang"  wrote:

> Have you all ever wondered why the default value for this property was
> not "Modal"? :)
>
> I worked with modal forms 99% of the time in all my previous VFP jobs.
>
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Adam Buckland
>  wrote:
> > Stupid question #2 ... how do I make it modal... (Shame of it as well
> it's on VFP 6)..
>
> --
>  .~. Might, Courage, Vision. SINCERITY!
> / v \ 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10 (Linux kernel 2.6.39.3)
> /( _ )\ http://sites.google.com/site/changmw
> ^ ^ May the Force and farces be with you!
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPqLOBxeOOE7PpON9NxxEybXAG4_tNouAZ7QE=qe1z0moa4...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Stupid form question

[Jean Laeremans]

np

On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Adam Buckland <adam.buckl...@eurohill.com>
wrote:

> Thanks Jean, sorted.
>
>
>
> 
> From: ProFox [profox-boun...@leafe.com] on behalf of Jean Laeremans [
> laeremans.jeanma...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 02 November 2016 14:06
> To: ProFox Email List
> Subject: Re: Stupid form question
>
> Form properties -> windowType = 1 modal
>
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Adam Buckland <adam.buckl...@eurohill.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Jean,
> >
> > Stupid question #2 ... how do I make it modal... (Shame of it as well
> it's
> > on VFP 6)..
> > ____
> > From: ProFox [profox-boun...@leafe.com] on behalf of Jean Laeremans [
> > laeremans.jeanma...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: 02 November 2016 13:36
> > To: ProFox Email List
> > Subject: Re: Stupid form question
> >
> > Make it a modal form ?
> > Missing read events ?
> >
> > A+
> > jml
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Adam Buckland <
> adam.buckl...@eurohill.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Final job before I leave this gig after 24 years...
> > >
> > > This shown how little code I've done in the last x years...
> > >
> > > I've got a menu that calls a form ivied:   DO FORM weekref.scx
> > >
> > > However when it runs as an executable yes it calls the form but then
> > hands
> > > control straight back to the menu so you can't actually do anything
> with
> > > the form.
> > >
> > > What is the stupidly obvious thing I'm not doing please???
> > >
> > > TIA
> > >
> > > Adam.
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPqLOBy-xoVjQaZHr74EtBNBE-XohrQJ1OB6wDAEqVaxmc=r...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Stupid form question

[Jean Laeremans]

Form properties -> windowType = 1 modal

On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Adam Buckland <adam.buckl...@eurohill.com>
wrote:

> Hi Jean,
>
> Stupid question #2 ... how do I make it modal... (Shame of it as well it's
> on VFP 6)..
> 
> From: ProFox [profox-boun...@leafe.com] on behalf of Jean Laeremans [
> laeremans.jeanma...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 02 November 2016 13:36
> To: ProFox Email List
> Subject: Re: Stupid form question
>
> Make it a modal form ?
> Missing read events ?
>
> A+
> jml
>
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Adam Buckland <adam.buckl...@eurohill.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Final job before I leave this gig after 24 years...
> >
> > This shown how little code I've done in the last x years...
> >
> > I've got a menu that calls a form ivied:   DO FORM weekref.scx
> >
> > However when it runs as an executable yes it calls the form but then
> hands
> > control straight back to the menu so you can't actually do anything with
> > the form.
> >
> > What is the stupidly obvious thing I'm not doing please???
> >
> > TIA
> >
> > Adam.
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capqlobxwcpytxhktz2pvn2--upz6fx_zun5vcb7l0fvh3iz...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Which Programming Language Should I Learn?

[Jean Laeremans]

Better leave those 'Wurst' alone Al

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Allen  wrote:

> And what about the other two?
> Al
>
> -Original Message- From: Dave Crozier
> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 11:00 AM
> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> Subject: RE: [NF] Which Programming Language Should I Learn?
>
> No, not correct.
>
> There are 3 kinds of people in the world, people who can count and people
> who can't
>
> ;-)
> Dave
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capqlobzuf-eg4gjvtebnny2tkmj8vbtsd-ge-4+z+yprsu3...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Easier than counting

[Jean Laeremans]

ROFL

On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Jerry Wolper  wrote:

> The first item here is software solving another of society's problems:
>
> http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2016/05/four-pictures-and-video
>
> -Jerry
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> ---
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPqLOBwwhFybdjxN-yzq2LXbLh2BDOow9L58CHn=g_+dsyh...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: security in programming

[Jean Laeremans]

Want secure ? Don't connect to the net. 

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Stephen Russell 
wrote:

> When they open the employee table and can read a SSN is when it gets shaky.
>
> Or open the customer table and make a copy for themselves as they walk off
> to a new job.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:48 AM, Ted Roche  wrote:
>
> > Well, nothing is secure, given North Korea has nuclear weapons. But
> > that's not the question, really.
> >
> > "Secure against what?"
> >
> > If the curious can read your DBFs in Excel, they may gain information
> > that you have a column named FooBar that holds integer values. If the
> > significance of FooBar isn't obvious unless you have access to
> > unencrypted source code, well, that might qualify as "secure enough."
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:43 AM, Alan Bourke 
> > wrote:
> > > IMO if your data is in DBF files, it's not secure.
> > >
> > > --
> > >   Alan Bourke
> > >   alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
> > >
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capqlobydtno8r5gmyvrqugj1aihqadywlj0xqbexplmxuqb...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Samba Subfolder Permissions

[Jean Laeremans]

http://www.webmin.com
On 2 Mar 2016 11:57 p.m., "Ted Roche"  wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Ken Dibble  wrote:
> > I have a Linux file server. I am using SAMBA 3 as a domain controller.
> >
> > I want to set up SAMBA shares on the file server that do not have to be
> > accessed from Windows machines via either UNC notation or by separate
> mapped
> > drives.
> >
> > Instead, I want to have a share on the Linux server called Public that is
> > accessible to all network users from any Windows machine. Within that
> share
> > I want all users to be able to open, edit, and create any files or
> folders,
> > EXCEPT certain specific folders.
>
> I've created some tricky Samba configurations, but they are tough to get
> right!
>
> Logged into the server using an admin account (like root), typing:
>
> testparrm
>
> will report what Samba thinks the configuration is, including an
> uncommented config output, which can be handy to compare against your
> Samba configs to see if there are commands Samba is ignoring or
> misinterpreting.
>
> Post that and we'll see if it matches what you've described above.
>
> --
> Ted Roche
> Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
> http://www.tedroche.com
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capqlobyte2y_w6_uo0k_ehqzq3yajbqv22prcbsgg4pvawo...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: A Curious Find: FoxTales

[Jean Laeremans]

Dl it yesterday to my tablet.

On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 3:01 AM, Ken Dibble  wrote:

>
> However, when I did find - was a small book called FoxTales: Behind the
>> Scenes at Fox Software.
>>
>
> A great book. I loved the part about how the reporting engine was a
> forbidding tangle of spaghetti code that everybody was afraid to touch.
>
> Ken Dibble
> www.stic-cil.org
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPqLOByRpaaVK6en_OaXU7HJ0YD=+apycvt+q16nitmgqrs...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT]

[Jean Laeremans]

Trump... how is it even remotely possible... Only in America ? ;)

On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 8:32 AM, Geoff Flight  wrote:

> I think everyone with a three-digit IQ and both front teeth is hoping Trump
> loses. Unfortunately, that might be no more than a scant majority.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Adam Buckland
> Sent: Wednesday, 2 March 2016 7:40 AM
> To: ProFox Email List 
> Subject: [OT]
>
> So this is before Super Duper Tuesday gets into force
>
>
> So Who's gonna win... Hillary or Trump?
>
>
> Outside the USA... but can vote...   ;-)
>
>
> Adam
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPqLOBzCPMh7c_ZaH=yhR3=fTTj_0aJk1RV4GS=gncxjfhb...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Jeff Johnson

[Jean Laeremans]

Sad news indeed


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPqLOBzRVK9kB9gfjrMUKprS3nrWFH5WGx=nbz4_rsydvyo...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [ADMIN] Server transition complete

[Jean Laeremans]

Ok
On 8 Jan 2016 11:31 p.m., "Ed Leafe"  wrote:

> I think that everything is working OK, at least as far as the email lists
> are concerned. So feel free to start posting again, and please let me know
> of any issues.
>
>
> -- Ed Leafe
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/signed
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   application/pgp-signature
> ---
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capqlobxgvw4sxqxujvybmhkcu0y2sugfwivdwm-iqo-6ij+...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Why IT systems go wrong, and the impact.

[Jean Laeremans]

Time flies.
On 29 Oct 2015 2:14 pm, "Alan Bourke"  wrote:

> I've been on this list for at least 13 years, which way predates the
> ProFoxTech split. I know how it and [OT] work.
>
> --
>   Alan Bourke
>   alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capqlobwfjtdzauo_kbcceh96s4twclw7tufqnttf0fytfax...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: How do I keep an operator from logging in twice from the same computer

[Jean Laeremans]

Posted by i believe  Kristof a long time ago.

A+
jml

#DEFINE APPID "App0002-13"

IIsAppRun(APPID)

FUNCTION IsAppRun( tcUniqueID )
LOCAL llRetVal, lcUniqueID

*** MUST pass an application ID to this function!

IF EMPTY(tcUniqueID) OR VARTYPE( tcUniqueID ) # "C"
MESSAGEBOX( 'An Application Specific Character ID is mandatory' +
CHR(13) ;
+ 'when calling the IsAppRun() function', 4160, 'Developer
Error' )
RETURN .T.
ELSE

*** Strip out any spaces
lcUniqueID = STRTRAN( tcUniqueID, " " )
ENDIF

*** First check for the existence of the Semaphore window
IF WEXIST("_Semaphore_")
RETURN .T.
ENDIF

*** Look for an occurrence of this ID as a Window Name

DECLARE INTEGER FindWindow IN Win32Api AS FindApp String, String

IF FindApp( NULL, lcUniqueID ) > 0
*** We found one! Set Return Value
llRetVal = .T.
ELSE
*** Create a new window with this ID
DEFINE WINDOW _Semaphore_ IN DESKTOP FROM 1,1 TO 2,2 TITLE lcUniqueID
ENDIF

*** Return Status Flag

RETURN llRetVal

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Stephen Weeks 
wrote:

> I have a user table and when the user logs in it puts a lock on his/her
> record and removes it when the user exits the syetem, in the event of a
> crash the lock is automatically removed.
>
> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015, at 08:35 PM, Kurt Wendt wrote:
> > Stephen - that's very interesting. When you gave the link - and I checked
> > it out - it wasn't quite clear where you run this command. But, I guessed
> > it was a DOS command - and I tried it myself and it worked. Very
> > interesting - I didn't know you could access the current running Tasks
> > list this way. Very Cool!
> >
> > -K-
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of
> > Stephen Russell
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 2:34 PM
> > To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> > Subject: Re: How do I keep an operator from logging in twice from the
> > same computer
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Wes Wilson  wrote:
> >
> > > I could create a flag but it will still be there if he crashes and
> > > tries to get back in.
> > > Is there not a way to check to see if an exe is running?
> > > ---
> >
> >
> > I would query the running applications myself.
> >
> > http://ss64.com/nt/tasklist.html
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Stephen Russell
> > Sr. Analyst
> > Ring Container Technology
> > Oakland TN
> >
> > 901.246-0159 cell
> >
> >
> > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative
> >   text/plain (text body -- kept)
> >   text/html
> > ---
> >
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capqlobxhme-u_wonwdvub528spheqziw68h8ksuxghw5jns...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Strange User Problem - VFP Attempting Install!

[Jean Laeremans]

A freeman methinks would be faster
On 29 Jul 2015 2:07 am, Ken Dibble krdib...@stny.rr.com wrote:


  Ken: Try googling setup.exe: ***ERRORLOG EVENT*** :
 ISetupComponent::Pre/Post/Install() failed in
 ISetupManager::InstallManagerHelper() -- I found a couple of articles
 with suggestions.


 Thanks Ted. I looked at a couple dozen of these. The only thing that
 seemed remotely relevant to a quick fix was downloading and installing
 MDAC. Didn't help. I did come across a couple of really
 bizarrely-translated Russian idioms, though. :)

 For the record: this is my home machine, Win 7 SP 1 32-bit. It's the
 second Win 7 machine I've installed VFP 9 on. The first one, at work, same
 OS, was flawless and hasn't given me a lick of trouble. The second one was
 done from the same media. So I doubt very much that any of the solutions
 that point to bad/corrupted install media are relevant.

 It's possible that it's MP3Gain that messed this up and not VFP. I did all
 this over the holidays last winter and I can't honestly remember if I tried
 to run the Code References tool in VFP on this machine before I installed
 MP3Gain or not.

 So this weekend I guess I will spend a couple hours picking worms out of
 the registry and reinstalling and get this ironed out.

 Thanks.

 Ken

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capqlobxqdetgjg0hhg4zqu0dy7d6vdsm3rnv_zphzo4uvzg...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Color laser printer advice

[Jean Laeremans]

+ 1 for Brother.

On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Ken McGinnis kamcgin...@gmail.com wrote:

 I'm sure. Mine is model MFC-8460N.

 I wish the thing would break because when it does, I am going to
 Costco.com and get one of the new color units. This thing is at least 8
 years old but works great so I can't get rid of it. Maybe I should donate
 it to the Salvation Army?

 On 7/10/2015 6:38 PM, Fred Taylor wrote:

 Ken,

 Are you sure your scanner doesn't do color?  I've got an old Brother
 DCP-1000 (I think) that was a bw printer, but it scanned in full color.

 Fred

 On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Ken McGinnis kamcgin...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  I agree with these comments about brother. For example, we have a
 monochrome laser that we used a lot a few years ago. We started getting a
 message to change the toner. Google says to block the little holes on the
 side of the cartridge to fool the printer into thinking that it is not
 out
 of toner. That was years ago and that thing still prints (we have a very
 low volume of monochrome prints). The copy is a little broken now (not
 too
 much for our work), but it still prints. We do have a spare toner
 cartridge
 to use when it finally quits.

 Also agree with the comments about HP, Samsung and I would add the same
 comment about Canon. We bought 2 expensive Canon printers, same day, same
 vendor. The ADF (auto document feed) quit about 1 month after the
 warrantee
 on both printers. (Funny coincidence). That brother still works perfectly
 and we use it for all our scanning when we don't need color.


 On 7/10/2015 4:04 PM, Fred Taylor wrote:

  I've never had an issue where I've let Windows do the drivers for a
 Brother
 printer, even if we had to use a different model driver than the actual
 printer, it's always just worked.

 Now a Samsung color laser, that's another story.  Until they came out
 with
 the Samsung universal driver, we had tons of problems with the drivers.

 Fred

 On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Michael Glassman 
 mhglass...@pioneerdrama.com wrote:

   Fred, I second not only the recommendation for Brother color laser

 printers
 but also the bloatware issue.  The trick is to never install the
 printer
 from the accompanying CD!  Instead, go to their support site
 (http://support.brother.com/), find the printer, and download not the
 Full
 Driver  Software Package but the just the Printer Driver instead.
 You'll get a clean install without all the other troublesome software.

 By the way, never let Windows automatically install the drivers for a
 Brother printer itself; it's never come out right in my experience.
 Always
 install the drivers manually.

 Mike

 ~

 -Original Message-
 From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of
 Mike
 Copeland
 Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 2:41 PM
 To: profoxt...@leafe.com
 Subject: Re: [NF] Color laser printer advice

 Thanks Fred!

 The one challenge I have had with Brother was that they LOVE to install
 software! Their printers come with enough software to rival HP for
 number
 of utilities installed. Are their consumables reasonably priced?

 Anyone else had good times with a mid-range color laser? $300 to $600
 price
 range?

 Mike

 Fred Taylor wrote:

  Recently bought a Brother HL-L8350CDW
 http://www.brother-usa.com/Printer/ModelDetail/1/HLL8350cdw/Overview
 
 for my daughter's and my wife's businesses.  They seem to like it.  No
 trouble so far, but that's been my experience with Brother printers,
 no

  trouble.

  Fred

 On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Mike Copeland m...@ggisoft.com

  wrote:

  Any recommendations for a color laser printer?

 Need one for medium volume printing, nothing over 8.5 x 11 stock.
 Not wanting ink-jet...expensive supplies.
 Not wanting Lexmark...multiple bad experiences with product.

 Thanks for all opinions!

 Mike Copeland

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capqlobyr1hk0dmkumemcotwc9jom2e_732l_b55we8virc8...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] New shiny thing...

[Jean Laeremans]

Those were the days.

On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Alan Bourke alanpbou...@fastmail.fm
wrote:

 On Wed, 17 Jun 2015, at 08:54 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
  15 year old kid who is coding.  At that same age we didn't have no
  stinkin
  computers.


 I did, old-timer. Albeit a Commodore 64.

 --
   Alan Bourke
   alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPqLOBydPcbXk8-N8ahnCMLRPwsEyqLY3k6qW=fgdkmxfsb...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Recomendations for a developer laptop

[Jean Laeremans]

 There hasn't been anything mentioned in the Apple sphere that you can't
 achieve with the two operating systems above.



You don't say... ;)

A+
jml


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPqLOByULkw+Ou3zWk2P+jakHSVt9+3i=a_fw9az1b3w30e...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Delay in USEing table on network causes errors, using VMs, Win7

[Jean Laeremans]

Around 15 years by now:
-Samba share
-50-60 concurrent users
- about 40 tables

Never had - touch wood - any problems, not even a faulty cdx file

A+
jml



Sorry but that's just not true in the general case. We have hundreds of
 sites where this is NOT the case. It's true that sometimes problems
 occur like the CDX corruption issue with SMB2 that cropped up in the
 early days of Windows 7, normally these can be worked around and are
 later hot-fixed out by Microsoft. I have found that the Windows 7 and
 Windows 8 combination with Server 2012 is extremely reliable in terms of
 DBF files.





--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPqLOBy8CRMnCu=jKucqg_eGRign=+u0yEM4PPqSgQu1_GvO=w...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: New project on VFPx: Bin 2 Text extension

[Jean Laeremans]

This might be interesting.

http://www.tek-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=1749215

A+
jml


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPqLOByz8OAu=-tap+nzzeybny2charoapodvo0pxkmxvtd...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: ProFox List Statistics for April 2015

[Jean Laeremans]

Your loss
On 5 May 2015 17:04, Glenn D. Hosford glenn.hosf...@ruffalonl.com wrote:

 Wow, I've been looking for a good forum for FoxPro, and was encouraged
 that this one seems more active than some. And I've been on plenty of other
 forums throughout the years and understand the camaraderie OT posts afford.

 But I signed up for the ProFoxTech list, and wasn't expecting the kind of
 posts I've seen in the past week. With the exception of congratulations to
 Virgil, all of the replies to this post have been quite immature. I agree
 there's a lot of junk on facebook, but I expect it there - not on a tech
 forum. IMHO, the freer exchange of opinions... doesn't serve you very
 well.

 And yeah, there may be no [OT] posts, but really--there should be. I
 almost included that flag in the subject, but since at least 1 poster only
 subscribes to the ProFoxTech list, including that flag may exclude some
 involved in this posting.

 Unfortunately, I don't think this will be my new home for FoxPro info. I
 will do as the ProFox FAQ recommends and ignore...these idiots. However,
 as this seems to include some of the most active posters, it may be best to
 just unsubscribe from the list. I don't mean to be inflammatory; I just
 wanted to let you know how you appear to any new members that might stop by.

 Thanks,

 Glenn Hosford


 -Original Message-
 From: Kurt Wendt [mailto:kurt_we...@globetax.com]
 Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 8:37 AM
 To: profoxt...@leafe.com
 Subject: RE: ProFox List Statistics for April 2015

 Pete - don't be Stupid like Michael is. I simply responded back to Ed -
 and posted the pics from Michael's FB Page - as Ed asked if I could post a
 screenshot.

 And - since YOU ARE THE ONE who originally posted about Michael and his FB
 page - then you are the one being foolish enough to be the ONE who started
 the Gossip! So - maybe you should Think Before you Type!!!

 -Original Message-
 From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Pete
 Theisen
 Sent: Monday, May 04, 2015 9:19 PM
 To: profoxt...@leafe.com
 Subject: Re: ProFox List Statistics for April 2015

 On 05/04/2015 08:01 PM, Kurt @ VR-FX wrote:

 I dunno, Kurt. If you have to gossip about a list member it should
 probably be [OT] . . .

  OK - Ed - here is the main pic from Mad-Again's FB Homepage:
   http://imgur.com/YjGcygs,y05ndiF#0
 
  And - here is some of his Rant/Pics:
   http://imgur.com/YjGcygs,y05ndiF#1
 
  But, am late to reply - since He already did - and is Ranting like NUTS!
 
  :-)
  -K-
 
  On 5/4/2015 3:01 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
  On May 4, 2015, at 1:52 PM, Kurt Wendt kurt_we...@globetax.com wrote:
 
  Well Ed, since I can't pass a Pic to this Forum - you have a simple
  suggestion for where I can post a pic for you all to see?
  http://imgur.com/
 
  I use it all the time!
 
 
  -- Ed Leafe
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/signed
 text/plain (text body -- kept)
 application/pgp-signature
  ---
 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPqLOBzHiXcmBxvdD5peRXH=aqv8ou1f6y9hw-eardc7m5x...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Windows 7 and Dot-Matrix Printers

[Jean Laeremans]

On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 4:24 AM, Stephen Russell srussell...@gmail.com
wrote:


 Were you upset when the newer cars no longer had the foot switch for high
 beams as well?


High beams, foot switch ? No such things on a carriage.

A+
jml


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPqLOBwBytam7XrqFHLt01LMUSrPT61ZKXWfQegfh6pY9di=8...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Thinking of moving from desktop to web?

[Jean Laeremans]

+1

A+
jml

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Alan Bourke alanpbou...@fastmail.fm
wrote:

  my belief is that, with whatever tutorial yo may have, a full, 100%,
  overnight conversion of a desktop app to the web is much too high a step
  for most VFP-based companies or developers.

 If it were easy, lots of people would have done it already. Web apps
 remain complicated and finicky and subject to browser quirks no matter
 what the platform of choice.

 --
   Alan Bourke
   alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capqlobzv7xfmhh5qdoge8cub36pin0h6-ojoznxipddszgw...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [NF] Stephen Russell

[Jean Laeremans]

Give the man a beer !
On 7 Apr 2015 15:59, Virgil Bierschwale vbier...@gmail.com wrote:

 Attaboy as we used to say in the Navy


 -Original Message-
 From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Johnson
 Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 8:52 AM
 To: profox@leafe.com
 Subject: [NF] Stephen Russell

 I want to publicly thank Stephen for helping me off line find the correct
 connection string to a SQL Server 2014 database.

 Thank you Stephen!

 --
 Jeff

 Jeff Johnson
 j...@san-dc.com
 SanDC, Inc.
 (623) 582-0323
 SMS (602) 717-5476
 Fax 623-869-0675

 www.san-dc.com
 www.cremationtracker.com
 www.agentrelationshipmanager.com



[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPqLOBzO9=kvrnf_kzfz24mdpgnw0d7zmnkmkzyeg--p962...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] its-not-always-quicker-to-do-things-in-memory

[Jean Laeremans]

On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Allen pro...@gatwicksoftware.com wrote:

 It seems the writer was referring to Java so its not really relevant to
 the real word :)
 Al


Nice try Al. Python too though... ;)


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capqlobzrm8gxnozjf0dvkarupcbg6c0m_dtbuagrbd_lzxz...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] its-not-always-quicker-to-do-things-in-memory

[Jean Laeremans]

On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Allen pro...@gatwicksoftware.com wrote:

 It was a lighthearted reminder that this is a foxpro group :)
 I must admit I saw Java and missed Python.
 Al


That's why it was labelled 'NF' Al.

JML


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPqLOBwOU0MmSomMmYuD=wk3mqev2bhevdpdanslihdju0m...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] its-not-always-quicker-to-do-things-in-memory

[Jean Laeremans]

Well that's foxcode.. we all know that fox is far superior to any other
language.. lol

On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 11:34 AM, AndyHC jarnd...@gmail.com wrote:

 Was the fwrite buffered???

 On 28/03/2015 15:38, Laurie Alvey wrote:

 Quite. I've  just rewritten my test code using (1)
   REPLICATE(char,100) followed by STRTOFILE and (2) 1,000,000
 sequential calls to FWRITE(handle, char). REPLICATE  took 47 ms and
 FWRITE took 1.047 secs.

 Laurie




[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capqlobzld+41wsq+jxkvhv1tztdf-0jrk7_z_hsorimtcte...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

[NF] its-not-always-quicker-to-do-things-in-memory

[Jean Laeremans]

http://www.itworld.com/article/2901453/no-its-not-always-quicker-to-do-things-in-memory.html


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPqLOBwMbCMLzDshPbi5QX=hxpx457ze_4pkofqlt4knnrr...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Mike Beane, R.I.P.

[Jean Laeremans]

Mike had his demons but he was a rather nice guy. I'll miss him dearly .
On 23 Mar 2015 18:17, Ted Roche tedro...@gmail.com wrote:

 I'm sorry to have to pass along the sad news that Mike Beane has
 passed away. The FaceBook post:

 Hello,

 This is Mike's daughter Allie. Sadly this past Thursday my dad passed
 away. He will be greatly missed and has left a void that cannot be
 filled. He is truly the best man I've ever known. His service will be
 held on Saturday, March 28 at Barr funeral home in Chicago, Illinois.
 The address is 6222 N. Broadway. It would be helpful if anyone
 planning on attending could text or call me at 773-329-1333 just so we
 can accommodate everyone properly. Thank you.


 --
 Ted Roche
 Ted Roche  Associates, LLC
 http://www.tedroche.com

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPqLOBz2SAb9++E20Z6hp9tBaO8=zpg4upjemzyvsfk2dzx...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] How cheap is it to get SQL Server Developer? VERY

[Jean Laeremans]

In the 70ties all properties, owners etc. of Belgium  was contained in a 30
Gb hierarchical db which at the time was considered to be rather big

A+
jml


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capqlobzqm9hufysbud+yewpzpo_88_ncktu199oo2vv0pdj...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] How cheap is it to get SQL Server Developer? VERY

[Jean Laeremans]

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Stephen Russell srussell...@gmail.com
wrote:

 When I got to the company the db was 15 gig and the log was 400+ gig.
 --
 Stephen Russell


ROFL

A+
jml


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capqlobxbasafm2gkmybuphn9ptsgi+wrakgb60lsnnpxkwb...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: John Koziol

[Jean Laeremans]

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Dave Crozier da...@flexipol.co.uk wrote:

 Jeff,
 He is on Facebook and puts up regular updates on his Chemo which is
 required at the moment as his condition is deteriorating unfortunately even
 though he is putting on a very brave face about it. I drop him a message
 every now and then to keep his spirits up.. Nice guy and very well
 respected.

 Oh didn't know he was sick.

A+
jml


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPqLOBwZ87JZaK=xgn4swbpf1a8ags3bctkuau+yqcj-vk2...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: New Assistant

[Jean Laeremans]

 Welcome aboard Tom.  Just ask him not to mention tabs v spaces.  I did
 once but I think I got away with it ;-)


 * Peter Cushing *
 IT development and support



Oh no you didn't...

A+
jml




[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capqlobx9czvg-t117iqogbv659p0wo092+r2pfapp3dapaq...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: using select in a case

[Jean Laeremans]

Look what you've done now Al...he's all excited.. LOL

A+
jml

On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Allen pro...@gatwicksoftware.com wrote:

 Lamballe, 26/01 15:21 to Montparnasse train 8646
 Back 28/1 19:06 train 8665
 Al

 -Original Message-
 From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Jean
 MAURICE
 Sent: 20 January 2015 15:19
 To: profoxt...@leafe.com
 Subject: Re: using select in a case

 from where ? when ? train number ?!!? ;-)

 Jean à Grenoble



 ---
 This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
 protection is active.
 http://www.avast.com


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capqlobziaexfjhr0zvz+p7h1ble_u8goihnt_cdsgto-zf4...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] 5 Best Practices for Designing Data-Driven Applications

[Jean Laeremans]

Thought we were talking beer...

On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Virgil Bierschwale vbier...@gmail.com
wrote:

 A topic we can all agree on.
 Speaking of that.

 I'm out
 You got any Miller Lite to spare...

 Virgil
 Keep America At Work


 -Original Message-
 From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Alan Bourke
 Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 2:17 AM
 To: profox@leafe.com; profoxt...@leafe.com
 Subject: Re: [NF] 5 Best Practices for Designing Data-Driven Applications


 On Mon, 12 Jan 2015, at 05:55 PM, M Jarvis wrote:
  Oops guys - sorry about that. I meant to make this a private
  conversation and I screwed it up. My apologies...

 Well now let's not be hasty - you mentioned beer - pray continue ...

 --
   Alan Bourke
   alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPqLOBxzzGJLnh5DQ=b2a2rciig8haxdtgy7kcdppothgxl...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Help with update

[Jean Laeremans]

IF SEEK()

On 10 Jan 2015 10:09, Man-wai Chang chan...@gmail.com wrote:

 Some comments for those old codes:

 1. There is no need to go top when doing a SCAN, unless you
 are trying to SCAN WHILE.
 2. There is no need to sele tsheets before ENDSCAN as SCAN remembers
 the table alias.
 3. A IF FOUND() should follow SEEK/LOCATE

 On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 5:43 AM, Sytze de Boer sytze.k...@gmail.com
wrote:
  sele tsheets
  go top
  scan
 sele stocks
 seek tsheets.stcode
 replace timesheets with timesheets+tsheets.qty
 sele tsheets
  endscan

 --
  .~. Might, Courage, Vision. SINCERITY!
 / v \ 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10 (Linux kernel 2.6.39.3)
 /( _ )\ http://sites.google.com/site/changmw
 ^ ^ May the Force and farces be with you!

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPqLOBz9oRZ2YTjs=q1dm-bpvnv2whbd6yrcvq_e_0k2lee...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Basic 4 iDevices

[Jean Laeremans]

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Dave Crozier da...@flexipol.co.uk wrote:

 P.S Have you started your Healthy Living phase after returning from
 Prague yet, or are you going to live the rest of your life as an I Don't
 Care-ist... lol! At least until after Christmas!

 Make a wild guess.. LOL

A+
jml


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPqLOBzEgUWsRAZPXYZ+_Y0Kv_iXYtYsXcFHg=l1nkbwx7v...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Remote desktop

[Jean Laeremans]

On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Allen pro...@gatwicksoftware.com wrote:

 Maybe in the summer. The hotel was good value. Not in the centre but only
 20 minutes walk. I would go back again.
 Al


Sure.. but only the way YOU walk... s

A+
jml


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capqloby9szjsfnwr3ra2cupefmiwyadtfyy7zmr7tkzjj5k...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Print2PDF Windows 8.

[Jean Laeremans]

winsteng.exe has to be run in XP mode under Win7 .
No idea about Win8

A+
jml


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capqlobxihe9quq27ppdklhgbcjjpmebsbiwal4oecpwxkqw...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: problem with missing cdx file

[Jean Laeremans]

On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Koen Piller koen.pil...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,

 you may use of the try..catch..endtry construction.
 Regards,

 Koen


With DOS 2.6 ?  ;)

A+
jml


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capqlobw9puxfz2v4emkj2w5jdotm5auj1sy3xg97o0gh7kt...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Old Dropbox accounts hacked

[Jean Laeremans]

This is what our bank uses :

https://www.vasco.com/products/client_products/card_reader_digipass/digipass_830.aspx

A+
jml

On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Stephen Russell srussell...@gmail.com
wrote:

 On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Paul McNett p...@mcnettware.com wrote:

  On 10/23/14, 10:23 AM, Ed Leafe wrote:
 
  I second lastpass, however I've noticed a troubling trend at banking
  sites where their 2factor authentication doesn't work well if at all
 with
  lastpass. Coupled with banking sites tendency to log me off after too a
  short time, It's had the effect of making me remember short passwords
 again
  for my most critically private information.
 
 
  What sort of 2fa are you handling with LastPass? I use it for the first
  (i.e., username/password), and the second is SMS to my phone.
 
 
  My banks call it 2-factor auth, but here it is in a nutshell:
 
  1) enter your user name or member number, hit submit
  2) verify that the image and phrase matches what you entered originally,
  enter password, and submit.
 
  I can get lastpass to save the member number for 1 and the password for
 2,
  but it doesn't auto-fill them for me no matter what I try, and once I
 have
  lastpass fill them, I still have to click 'submit' myself.
 
  --


 I had that with one bank.  Hated it.

 The call your phone with the key is so much better.  Granted you need to
 have that same phone with you...


 --
 Stephen Russell
 Sr. Analyst
 Ring Container Technology
 Oakland TN

 901.246-0159 cell


 --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
 multipart/alternative
   text/plain (text body -- kept)
   text/html
 ---

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capqlobzfouyccz2qljw++bw7qj+kuvsaprrp37-tfmwknqh...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.