[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.10 (RC3)

2015-08-13 Thread Robbie Gemmell
There were 7 binding and 1 non-binding +1 votes, with no other votes
received. The vote has passed.

I will re-tag the 0.10-rc3 tag in the repo as 0.10 proper, add the
release files to the dist release svn repo, and release the maven
staging repo. The website will be updated later after the artifacts
have had time to sync to the mirrors.

Robbie


Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.10 (RC3)

2015-08-13 Thread Andrew Stitcher
I've now figured out the issue (and it's an instructive problem):

PROTON-979: [1]

It seems that both OpenSSL and Cyrus SASL have interacting global
state. If SASL gets to initialise libcrypto first then when the SSL
code tries to do it it fails.

Just another emphasis that neither openssl nor Cyrus sasl is really
suitable to be used as part of a library.


[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-979
On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 17:41 -0400, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
> I've tested proton-c on ubuntu1404, ubuntu1204 & FreeBSD 10.1p17
> 
> Ubuntu 1204 builds and ctests fine.
> This is our the OS on our travis CI so it's not a surprise it works.
> 
> Ubuntu 1404 - I'm having problems with the "python" tests and SSL -
> investigating whether this is my config or something more. This is a
> little worrying
> 
> FreeBSD - I'm getting test failures in
> proton_tests.messenger.SelectableMessengerTest.testSelectable*
> This might reflect some difference in poll() behaviour.
> 
> I'm also getting failures in
> ...*_valgrind with output like this...
> AssertionError: Unexpected input while waiting for receiver to
> initialize: ==12271== Use of uninitialised value of size 8
> 
> Which seems like valgrind detected use of an uninitialised value.
> I don't know it this is in proton or one of the lib it uses yet.
> 
> Not sure if FreeBSD is important enough to care too much, but it 
> should
> work.
> 
> [so no -1 yet, but investigating. IMO the FreeBSD failures aren't
> enough to reject the release, but the Ubuntu failures might be]
> 
> Andrew
> 
> On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 21:08 +0100, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I have put up a third cut for 0.10, please test it and vote 
> > accordingly.
> > 
> > Since RC2 there have been fixes for PROTON-978, PROTON-975, and 
> > PROTON-899.
> > 
> > The release archive and sig/checksums can be grabbed from:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.10-rc3/
> > 
> > Maven artifacts for the Java bits can be found in a temporary 
> > staging 
> > repo at:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-10
> > 42
> > 
> > It is tagged as 0.10-rc3. You may need to fetch the tags explicitly 
> > to
> > see it, e.g: "git fetch --tags"
> > 
> > Regards,


Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.10 (RC3)

2015-08-13 Thread Andrew Stitcher
I vote +1:

I've tested proton-c & python on:
Ubuntu 12.04 (amd64)
Ubuntu 14.04 (amd64/i686)
Raspberry Pi2 (Raspbian Jesse)
FreeBSD 10.1p17
Windows 8.1 with Visual Studio 12 (2013)

[Some of these test have had Java & tox as well but it's been uneven)

And modulo some (severe) irritations (see the other messages) there
have been no blocking problems.

Andrew

On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 21:08 +0100, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I have put up a third cut for 0.10, please test it and vote 
> accordingly.
> 
> Since RC2 there have been fixes for PROTON-978, PROTON-975, and 
> PROTON-899.
> 
> The release archive and sig/checksums can be grabbed from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.10-rc3/
> 
> Maven artifacts for the Java bits can be found in a temporary staging 
> repo at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-1042
> 
> It is tagged as 0.10-rc3. You may need to fetch the tags explicitly 
> to
> see it, e.g: "git fetch --tags"
> 
> Regards,
> Robbie


Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.10 (RC3)

2015-08-13 Thread Robbie Gemmell
Great, well done figuring it out!

Care to vote yet? :)

Robbie

On 13 August 2015 at 21:16, Andrew Stitcher  wrote:
> I've now figured out the issue (and it's an instructive problem):
>
> PROTON-979: [1]
>
> It seems that both OpenSSL and Cyrus SASL have interacting global
> state. If SASL gets to initialise libcrypto first then when the SSL
> code tries to do it it fails.
>
> Just another emphasis that neither openssl nor Cyrus sasl is really
> suitable to be used as part of a library.
>
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-979
> On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 17:41 -0400, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
>> I've tested proton-c on ubuntu1404, ubuntu1204 & FreeBSD 10.1p17
>>
>> Ubuntu 1204 builds and ctests fine.
>> This is our the OS on our travis CI so it's not a surprise it works.
>>
>> Ubuntu 1404 - I'm having problems with the "python" tests and SSL -
>> investigating whether this is my config or something more. This is a
>> little worrying
>>
>> FreeBSD - I'm getting test failures in
>> proton_tests.messenger.SelectableMessengerTest.testSelectable*
>> This might reflect some difference in poll() behaviour.
>>
>> I'm also getting failures in
>> ...*_valgrind with output like this...
>> AssertionError: Unexpected input while waiting for receiver to
>> initialize: ==12271== Use of uninitialised value of size 8
>>
>> Which seems like valgrind detected use of an uninitialised value.
>> I don't know it this is in proton or one of the lib it uses yet.
>>
>> Not sure if FreeBSD is important enough to care too much, but it
>> should
>> work.
>>
>> [so no -1 yet, but investigating. IMO the FreeBSD failures aren't
>> enough to reject the release, but the Ubuntu failures might be]
>>
>> Andrew
>>
>> On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 21:08 +0100, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I have put up a third cut for 0.10, please test it and vote
>> > accordingly.
>> >
>> > Since RC2 there have been fixes for PROTON-978, PROTON-975, and
>> > PROTON-899.
>> >
>> > The release archive and sig/checksums can be grabbed from:
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.10-rc3/
>> >
>> > Maven artifacts for the Java bits can be found in a temporary
>> > staging
>> > repo at:
>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-10
>> > 42
>> >
>> > It is tagged as 0.10-rc3. You may need to fetch the tags explicitly
>> > to
>> > see it, e.g: "git fetch --tags"
>> >
>> > Regards,


Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.10 (RC3)

2015-08-13 Thread Ted Ross



On 08/13/2015 03:20 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:

To clarify, my run was also using the x86_64 / amd64 version, using a VM.

Neither of us have been able to reproduce what Andrew saw, so unless
we can get a better idea what it is specifically then I am inclined to
say that we proceed. If there is an issue and it can be identified,
I'm sure it will be joined by others once a larger group of folks can
actually get there hands on a release, and I'll happilly cut a 0.10.1
to address them if fixes are available.


+1



Robbie

On 13 August 2015 at 20:05, Ted Ross  wrote:

I ran the tests under Ubuntu 14.04 (for amd64) running an x86_64 Linux
kernel (using Docker).  All of the tests, including the SSL tests pass.

-Ted


On 08/13/2015 09:56 AM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:


I have run up a fresh Ubuntu 14.04.3 install didn't see any issues
(once I figured out what packages to install to get the tests all
running). Can you elaborate on the problem you are seeing?

Robbie

On 12 August 2015 at 22:41, Andrew Stitcher  wrote:


I've tested proton-c on ubuntu1404, ubuntu1204 & FreeBSD 10.1p17

Ubuntu 1204 builds and ctests fine.
This is our the OS on our travis CI so it's not a surprise it works.

Ubuntu 1404 - I'm having problems with the "python" tests and SSL -
investigating whether this is my config or something more. This is a
little worrying

FreeBSD - I'm getting test failures in
proton_tests.messenger.SelectableMessengerTest.testSelectable*
This might reflect some difference in poll() behaviour.

I'm also getting failures in
...*_valgrind with output like this...
AssertionError: Unexpected input while waiting for receiver to
initialize: ==12271== Use of uninitialised value of size 8

Which seems like valgrind detected use of an uninitialised value.
I don't know it this is in proton or one of the lib it uses yet.

Not sure if FreeBSD is important enough to care too much, but it should
work.

[so no -1 yet, but investigating. IMO the FreeBSD failures aren't
enough to reject the release, but the Ubuntu failures might be]

Andrew

On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 21:08 +0100, Robbie Gemmell wrote:


Hi all,

I have put up a third cut for 0.10, please test it and vote
accordingly.

Since RC2 there have been fixes for PROTON-978, PROTON-975, and
PROTON-899.

The release archive and sig/checksums can be grabbed from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.10-rc3/

Maven artifacts for the Java bits can be found in a temporary staging
repo at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-1042

It is tagged as 0.10-rc3. You may need to fetch the tags explicitly
to
see it, e.g: "git fetch --tags"

Regards,
Robbie



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.10 (RC3)

2015-08-13 Thread Robbie Gemmell
To clarify, my run was also using the x86_64 / amd64 version, using a VM.

Neither of us have been able to reproduce what Andrew saw, so unless
we can get a better idea what it is specifically then I am inclined to
say that we proceed. If there is an issue and it can be identified,
I'm sure it will be joined by others once a larger group of folks can
actually get there hands on a release, and I'll happilly cut a 0.10.1
to address them if fixes are available.

Robbie

On 13 August 2015 at 20:05, Ted Ross  wrote:
> I ran the tests under Ubuntu 14.04 (for amd64) running an x86_64 Linux
> kernel (using Docker).  All of the tests, including the SSL tests pass.
>
> -Ted
>
>
> On 08/13/2015 09:56 AM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>>
>> I have run up a fresh Ubuntu 14.04.3 install didn't see any issues
>> (once I figured out what packages to install to get the tests all
>> running). Can you elaborate on the problem you are seeing?
>>
>> Robbie
>>
>> On 12 August 2015 at 22:41, Andrew Stitcher  wrote:
>>>
>>> I've tested proton-c on ubuntu1404, ubuntu1204 & FreeBSD 10.1p17
>>>
>>> Ubuntu 1204 builds and ctests fine.
>>> This is our the OS on our travis CI so it's not a surprise it works.
>>>
>>> Ubuntu 1404 - I'm having problems with the "python" tests and SSL -
>>> investigating whether this is my config or something more. This is a
>>> little worrying
>>>
>>> FreeBSD - I'm getting test failures in
>>> proton_tests.messenger.SelectableMessengerTest.testSelectable*
>>> This might reflect some difference in poll() behaviour.
>>>
>>> I'm also getting failures in
>>> ...*_valgrind with output like this...
>>> AssertionError: Unexpected input while waiting for receiver to
>>> initialize: ==12271== Use of uninitialised value of size 8
>>>
>>> Which seems like valgrind detected use of an uninitialised value.
>>> I don't know it this is in proton or one of the lib it uses yet.
>>>
>>> Not sure if FreeBSD is important enough to care too much, but it should
>>> work.
>>>
>>> [so no -1 yet, but investigating. IMO the FreeBSD failures aren't
>>> enough to reject the release, but the Ubuntu failures might be]
>>>
>>> Andrew
>>>
>>> On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 21:08 +0100, Robbie Gemmell wrote:

 Hi all,

 I have put up a third cut for 0.10, please test it and vote
 accordingly.

 Since RC2 there have been fixes for PROTON-978, PROTON-975, and
 PROTON-899.

 The release archive and sig/checksums can be grabbed from:
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.10-rc3/

 Maven artifacts for the Java bits can be found in a temporary staging
 repo at:
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-1042

 It is tagged as 0.10-rc3. You may need to fetch the tags explicitly
 to
 see it, e.g: "git fetch --tags"

 Regards,
 Robbie
>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
>


Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.10 (RC3)

2015-08-13 Thread Ted Ross
I ran the tests under Ubuntu 14.04 (for amd64) running an x86_64 Linux 
kernel (using Docker).  All of the tests, including the SSL tests pass.


-Ted

On 08/13/2015 09:56 AM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:

I have run up a fresh Ubuntu 14.04.3 install didn't see any issues
(once I figured out what packages to install to get the tests all
running). Can you elaborate on the problem you are seeing?

Robbie

On 12 August 2015 at 22:41, Andrew Stitcher  wrote:

I've tested proton-c on ubuntu1404, ubuntu1204 & FreeBSD 10.1p17

Ubuntu 1204 builds and ctests fine.
This is our the OS on our travis CI so it's not a surprise it works.

Ubuntu 1404 - I'm having problems with the "python" tests and SSL -
investigating whether this is my config or something more. This is a
little worrying

FreeBSD - I'm getting test failures in
proton_tests.messenger.SelectableMessengerTest.testSelectable*
This might reflect some difference in poll() behaviour.

I'm also getting failures in
...*_valgrind with output like this...
AssertionError: Unexpected input while waiting for receiver to
initialize: ==12271== Use of uninitialised value of size 8

Which seems like valgrind detected use of an uninitialised value.
I don't know it this is in proton or one of the lib it uses yet.

Not sure if FreeBSD is important enough to care too much, but it should
work.

[so no -1 yet, but investigating. IMO the FreeBSD failures aren't
enough to reject the release, but the Ubuntu failures might be]

Andrew

On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 21:08 +0100, Robbie Gemmell wrote:

Hi all,

I have put up a third cut for 0.10, please test it and vote
accordingly.

Since RC2 there have been fixes for PROTON-978, PROTON-975, and
PROTON-899.

The release archive and sig/checksums can be grabbed from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.10-rc3/

Maven artifacts for the Java bits can be found in a temporary staging
repo at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-1042

It is tagged as 0.10-rc3. You may need to fetch the tags explicitly
to
see it, e.g: "git fetch --tags"

Regards,
Robbie


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.10 (RC3)

2015-08-13 Thread Robbie Gemmell
I have run up a fresh Ubuntu 14.04.3 install didn't see any issues
(once I figured out what packages to install to get the tests all
running). Can you elaborate on the problem you are seeing?

Robbie

On 12 August 2015 at 22:41, Andrew Stitcher  wrote:
> I've tested proton-c on ubuntu1404, ubuntu1204 & FreeBSD 10.1p17
>
> Ubuntu 1204 builds and ctests fine.
> This is our the OS on our travis CI so it's not a surprise it works.
>
> Ubuntu 1404 - I'm having problems with the "python" tests and SSL -
> investigating whether this is my config or something more. This is a
> little worrying
>
> FreeBSD - I'm getting test failures in
> proton_tests.messenger.SelectableMessengerTest.testSelectable*
> This might reflect some difference in poll() behaviour.
>
> I'm also getting failures in
> ...*_valgrind with output like this...
> AssertionError: Unexpected input while waiting for receiver to
> initialize: ==12271== Use of uninitialised value of size 8
>
> Which seems like valgrind detected use of an uninitialised value.
> I don't know it this is in proton or one of the lib it uses yet.
>
> Not sure if FreeBSD is important enough to care too much, but it should
> work.
>
> [so no -1 yet, but investigating. IMO the FreeBSD failures aren't
> enough to reject the release, but the Ubuntu failures might be]
>
> Andrew
>
> On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 21:08 +0100, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have put up a third cut for 0.10, please test it and vote
>> accordingly.
>>
>> Since RC2 there have been fixes for PROTON-978, PROTON-975, and
>> PROTON-899.
>>
>> The release archive and sig/checksums can be grabbed from:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.10-rc3/
>>
>> Maven artifacts for the Java bits can be found in a temporary staging
>> repo at:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-1042
>>
>> It is tagged as 0.10-rc3. You may need to fetch the tags explicitly
>> to
>> see it, e.g: "git fetch --tags"
>>
>> Regards,
>> Robbie
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
>


Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.10 (RC3)

2015-08-12 Thread Andrew Stitcher
I've tested proton-c on ubuntu1404, ubuntu1204 & FreeBSD 10.1p17

Ubuntu 1204 builds and ctests fine.
This is our the OS on our travis CI so it's not a surprise it works.

Ubuntu 1404 - I'm having problems with the "python" tests and SSL -
investigating whether this is my config or something more. This is a
little worrying

FreeBSD - I'm getting test failures in
proton_tests.messenger.SelectableMessengerTest.testSelectable*
This might reflect some difference in poll() behaviour.

I'm also getting failures in
...*_valgrind with output like this...
AssertionError: Unexpected input while waiting for receiver to
initialize: ==12271== Use of uninitialised value of size 8

Which seems like valgrind detected use of an uninitialised value.
I don't know it this is in proton or one of the lib it uses yet.

Not sure if FreeBSD is important enough to care too much, but it should
work.

[so no -1 yet, but investigating. IMO the FreeBSD failures aren't
enough to reject the release, but the Ubuntu failures might be]

Andrew

On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 21:08 +0100, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I have put up a third cut for 0.10, please test it and vote 
> accordingly.
> 
> Since RC2 there have been fixes for PROTON-978, PROTON-975, and 
> PROTON-899.
> 
> The release archive and sig/checksums can be grabbed from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.10-rc3/
> 
> Maven artifacts for the Java bits can be found in a temporary staging 
> repo at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-1042
> 
> It is tagged as 0.10-rc3. You may need to fetch the tags explicitly 
> to
> see it, e.g: "git fetch --tags"
> 
> Regards,
> Robbie


Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.10 (RC3)

2015-08-12 Thread Cliff Jansen
+1... a smaller set of Windows tests than Chuck's, but looks good to me

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Robbie Gemmell
 wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have put up a third cut for 0.10, please test it and vote accordingly.
>
> Since RC2 there have been fixes for PROTON-978, PROTON-975, and PROTON-899.
>
> The release archive and sig/checksums can be grabbed from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.10-rc3/
>
> Maven artifacts for the Java bits can be found in a temporary staging repo at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-1042
>
> It is tagged as 0.10-rc3. You may need to fetch the tags explicitly to
> see it, e.g: "git fetch --tags"
>
> Regards,
> Robbie
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
>


Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.10 (RC3)

2015-08-12 Thread Timothy Bish
On 08/11/2015 04:08 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have put up a third cut for 0.10, please test it and vote accordingly.
>
> Since RC2 there have been fixes for PROTON-978, PROTON-975, and PROTON-899.
>
> The release archive and sig/checksums can be grabbed from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.10-rc3/
>
> Maven artifacts for the Java bits can be found in a temporary staging repo at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-1042
>
> It is tagged as 0.10-rc3. You may need to fetch the tags explicitly to
> see it, e.g: "git fetch --tags"
>
> Regards,
> Robbie
>
+1

Java bits look good when tested with ActiveMQ 5.12.0 and the QPid JMS
client. 

-- 
Tim Bish
Sr Software Engineer | RedHat Inc.
tim.b...@redhat.com | www.redhat.com 
twitter: @tabish121
blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/



Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.10 (RC3)

2015-08-12 Thread Robbie Gemmell
+1

I performed some of my earlier testing of RC2 using Qpid C++ 0.34,
ActiveMQ 5.12, and Qpid JMS master. I also verified that I was now
able to connect to qpidd using DIGEST-MD5 following the fix for
PROTON-975.

Robbie

On 11 August 2015 at 21:08, Robbie Gemmell  wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have put up a third cut for 0.10, please test it and vote accordingly.
>
> Since RC2 there have been fixes for PROTON-978, PROTON-975, and PROTON-899.
>
> The release archive and sig/checksums can be grabbed from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.10-rc3/
>
> Maven artifacts for the Java bits can be found in a temporary staging repo at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-1042
>
> It is tagged as 0.10-rc3. You may need to fetch the tags explicitly to
> see it, e.g: "git fetch --tags"
>
> Regards,
> Robbie


Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.10 (RC3)

2015-08-12 Thread Flavio Percoco

+1

I tested the python bindings. Built the buindings through cmake and
ran tests. I also ran tox and tested the pip install process. It seems
to work as expected.

Thanks

On 11/08/15 21:08 +0100, Robbie Gemmell wrote:

Hi all,

I have put up a third cut for 0.10, please test it and vote accordingly.

Since RC2 there have been fixes for PROTON-978, PROTON-975, and PROTON-899.

The release archive and sig/checksums can be grabbed from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.10-rc3/

Maven artifacts for the Java bits can be found in a temporary staging repo at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-1042

It is tagged as 0.10-rc3. You may need to fetch the tags explicitly to
see it, e.g: "git fetch --tags"

Regards,
Robbie


--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco


pgpMFaSBYYL9V.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.10 (RC3)

2015-08-11 Thread Chuck Rolke
+1

Built visual studio (2008, 2010, 2012, 2013)(x86, x64).
Ran tests against qpidd and activemq 5.12 brokers using qpid client auth.

- Original Message -
> From: "Robbie Gemmell" 
> To: us...@qpid.apache.org, proton@qpid.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 4:08:01 PM
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.10 (RC3)
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I have put up a third cut for 0.10, please test it and vote accordingly.
> 
> Since RC2 there have been fixes for PROTON-978, PROTON-975, and PROTON-899.
> 
> The release archive and sig/checksums can be grabbed from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.10-rc3/
> 
> Maven artifacts for the Java bits can be found in a temporary staging repo
> at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-1042
> 
> It is tagged as 0.10-rc3. You may need to fetch the tags explicitly to
> see it, e.g: "git fetch --tags"
> 
> Regards,
> Robbie
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
> 
> 


Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.10 (RC3)

2015-08-11 Thread Ted Ross

+1

I tested proton-c against Dispatch Router.  It all looks good.

-Ted

On 08/11/2015 04:08 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:

Hi all,

I have put up a third cut for 0.10, please test it and vote accordingly.

Since RC2 there have been fixes for PROTON-978, PROTON-975, and PROTON-899.

The release archive and sig/checksums can be grabbed from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.10-rc3/

Maven artifacts for the Java bits can be found in a temporary staging repo at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-1042

It is tagged as 0.10-rc3. You may need to fetch the tags explicitly to
see it, e.g: "git fetch --tags"

Regards,
Robbie



[VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.10 (RC3)

2015-08-11 Thread Robbie Gemmell
Hi all,

I have put up a third cut for 0.10, please test it and vote accordingly.

Since RC2 there have been fixes for PROTON-978, PROTON-975, and PROTON-899.

The release archive and sig/checksums can be grabbed from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.10-rc3/

Maven artifacts for the Java bits can be found in a temporary staging repo at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-1042

It is tagged as 0.10-rc3. You may need to fetch the tags explicitly to
see it, e.g: "git fetch --tags"

Regards,
Robbie