test message
This is a test message I reformatted and wanted to make sure I have the corect adress to poste to. Jake
Re: Auto-Tune V7
Hey man. Actually, what comes on the CD is Melodyne, not Autotune. BUt it doesn't come as a download from the site. It's only available as one of the disks that ship. Hope that helps. Kevin > Hey Kevin,I got PT 9.3 from the avid site! > Where is Autotune located? > > On Oct 16, 2011, at 8:51 PM, Kevin Reeves wrote: > >> Hey gord. It is indeed available as rtas, and comes as a free light version >> with your purchase of Pro Tools. I think you've got it on one of the dvd's >> that came with either 8 or 9, not sure which. Maybe it came with both >> versions. Hope that helps. >> >> Kev >> >>> Hi. >>> Autotune 7 works fine as an insert effect in pt, and yes, the parameters do >>> show up with voice over. As a matter of fact, you see more stuff here than >>> you do when using it as a VST in windows with Sonar, haven't tried it with >>> reaper though. Some folks like meladyn but I don't even know if that is >>> available as an rtas plug. >>> Gord >>> >>> -Original Message- From: Christopher-Mark Gilland >>> Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2011 6:20 AM >>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com >>> Subject: Auto-Tune V7 >>> >>> Has anyone had much success with tweeking the settings of the Auto-Tune >>> plugin after insertting it on an audio track? I know some 3rd party plugins >>> work, but others simply put, don't. Was just wonderring if this is one a >>> those that simply won't, unless you like the default settings, which I kind >>> a ish, do, but it would be nice to modify them if ever needed, admittedly. >>> >>> Also, are there any other pitch correction plugins aside auto-tune that I >>> could maybe try a demo of to see how I like? >>> >>> Chris. >> > > Chuck Reichel > 954-742-0019 > www.SoundPictureRecording.com > > >
Re: Auto-Tune V7
Hi Kevin, You are accurate now! Melodyne is useless except in stand alone mode! I am still thinking about upgrading my Autotune to Autotune 7, as waves Tune for pitch correction is still inches away from being VoiceOver friendly! BTW I got my PT 9. upgrade from Washing pro not Avid, must have been a long session day! LOL Talk soon On Oct 17, 2011, at 5:17 AM, Kevin Reeves wrote: Hey man. Actually, what comes on the CD is Melodyne, not Autotune. BUt it doesn't come as a download from the site. It's only available as one of the disks that ship. Hope that helps. Kevin Hey Kevin,I got PT 9.3 from the avid site! Where is Autotune located? On Oct 16, 2011, at 8:51 PM, Kevin Reeves wrote: Hey gord. It is indeed available as rtas, and comes as a free light version with your purchase of Pro Tools. I think you've got it on one of the dvd's that came with either 8 or 9, not sure which. Maybe it came with both versions. Hope that helps. Kev Hi. Autotune 7 works fine as an insert effect in pt, and yes, the parameters do show up with voice over. As a matter of fact, you see more stuff here than you do when using it as a VST in windows with Sonar, haven't tried it with reaper though. Some folks like meladyn but I don't even know if that is available as an rtas plug. Gord -Original Message- From: Christopher-Mark Gilland Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2011 6:20 AM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Auto-Tune V7 Has anyone had much success with tweeking the settings of the Auto-Tune plugin after insertting it on an audio track? I know some 3rd party plugins work, but others simply put, don't. Was just wonderring if this is one a those that simply won't, unless you like the default settings, which I kind a ish, do, but it would be nice to modify them if ever needed, admittedly. Also, are there any other pitch correction plugins aside auto- tune that I could maybe try a demo of to see how I like? Chris. Chuck Reichel 954-742-0019 www.SoundPictureRecording.com Chuck Reichel 954-742-0019 www.SoundPictureRecording.com
Re: 2 questions
Oh thanks a lot for that. I've been wanting to do that myself. Gord -Original Message- From: Kevin Reeves Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2011 8:29 PM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: 2 questions Oh cool. I couldn't get the nudge values to work, but didn't realize you had to press the nudge button to put your focus on that fields. Back in the OS 9 days, The nudge value was always visible. Thanks. Kevin On Oct 16, 2011, at 8:22 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote: Hey steve, You don't need to go through the trouble of navigating to the edit mode and tool clusters. There are keyboard shortcuts for that. For example, f1 through f4 selects the edit modes. f1 is shuffle, f2 is slip, etc. I can never remember the tools because I always use the Selector Tool but it's also something like f7 but, once you set it, as long as you don't select another tool, it'll stay the same tool. The Edit and Timeline should always be linked and certainly, as I mentioned, having the edit selection and track selection linked is helpful for VoiceOver users. If you uncheck "audio during fast forward and rewind" in the Preferences, the 1 and 2 keys will step you by bars if you're in bars/beats. The other thing you can do is increase your nudge value to 1 bar and use the plus and minus keys on the num pad to move forward and backward by 1 bar at a time. If you're in bars/beats mode, press the nudge button in the counter display cluster and type 1 on the num pad and press Enter. Now you're nudge value is 1 bar. HTH, Slau
Re: recommendation for a good rtas channel strip
The waves stuff does have some RTAS plugs as well, however they aren't very accessible atleast with out mapping the control to a control surface from what i have read on here. However From what i understand the Izotope stuff should be VO friendly and Izotope said that do do some basic VO testing with all their Plugs now and welcome feedback. Nectar is their vocal channel strip, alloy is there general purpose channel strip, and ozone is their mastering oriented channel strip. I believe there should be free demos on the www.izotope.com site to check out. Been meaning to check these out and post my experiences myself, but working on mastering editing with PT before i get back into mixing again so haven't gotten around to it yet. Post your experiences please if you try them before i do. On 10/16/11, Gordon Kent wrote: > Are there any good channel strip plugs that will work with VO and PT. It > seems that most of the waves stuff is for native setups, but maybe I have > that wrong. I would just like to get something better than the stock eq's > and compressor. The factory plug-ins have been around since pt6 and maybe > earlier than that. The bomb factory compressor is a bit better, but it > would be nice to have a strip with comp/eq/tube distortion etc. > Gord > > -Original Message- > From: Slau Halatyn > Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2011 11:20 AM > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: Master Tracks? > > No worries, I didn't take it that way at all. It's definitely an aspect of > using the master track that one should consider. At this point, I think the > issue of pre versus post fader compression is beyond the question when > someone is just trying to get their head around Pro Tools in general, > that'sl all. > > Cheers, > > Slau > > On Oct 16, 2011, at 11:03 AM, Stephen Martin wrote: > >> I do agree with you, and i do apologize if i came off as trying to correct >> >> you or saying you shouldn't put a compressor on the master track. It was >> intended more as a suggestion or tip that i came across in my own journey >> >> in learning more about PT, and figured i'd would share another way of >> doing it with the list. >> On Oct 16, 2011, at 10:49 AM, Slau Halatyn wrote: >> >>> As with most things, there's more than one way to accomplish a task and >>> this is one of them. Some people put compressors on the master track, >>> some don't. I'm simply illustrating one of its uses. >>> >>> Slau >>> >>> On Oct 16, 2011, at 10:02 AM, Stephen Martin wrote: >>> I have read in a few places where they don't always recommend putting a master compressor on the master track, since the master track unlike all the other tracks in pro tools has the fader before the inserts and sends, which means if u put a compressor on the master track, set it up how u like, then later adjust the master fader, it will pretty much cause you to have to go redo the compressor settings. A work around is to create a sub mimix aux track and send all your tracks to that, add all your master effects on that track and output that to the master track. On Oct 16, 2011, at 9:54 AM, Slau Halatyn wrote: > Christopher, > > Master tracks control the output level being fed to an output bus. Most > > often, a master track will control the main left and right outputs for > a stereo mix. It's not necessary to necessarily use a master track for > a regular mix but it certainly does help to create a master track to > see the combined level of all of the individual tracks on the master > track's level meter. Further, when putting bus compression over an > entire mix, it would normally be done with a compressor plug-in on a > master track. Finally, master tracks are used when creating stems for > surround mixes, alternate mixes, instrumental versions, etc. Again, > most people just use a single master track for overall mix purposes. > > HTH, > > Slau > > >>> >> >
Re: Auto-Tune V7
So does that mean we have access to the Garget Notes Via Midi option Gord? As for the question regarding how to get to the parameters, I can't answer that because I'm not using ProTools at the moment. I will be very shortly though. Thanks On 17 Oct 2011, at 13:12, Chuck Reichel wrote: > Hi Kevin, > You are accurate now! >> Melodyne is useless except in stand alone mode! > I am still thinking about upgrading my Autotune to Autotune 7, as waves Tune > for pitch correction is still inches away from being VoiceOver friendly! > BTW I got my PT 9. upgrade from Washing pro not Avid, must have been a long > session day! LOL > Talk soon > > > > On Oct 17, 2011, at 5:17 AM, Kevin Reeves wrote: > >> Hey man. Actually, what comes on the CD is Melodyne, not Autotune. BUt it >> doesn't come as a download from the site. It's only available as one of the >> disks that ship. Hope that helps. >> >> Kevin >> >>> Hey Kevin,I got PT 9.3 from the avid site! >>> Where is Autotune located? >>> >>> On Oct 16, 2011, at 8:51 PM, Kevin Reeves wrote: >>> Hey gord. It is indeed available as rtas, and comes as a free light version with your purchase of Pro Tools. I think you've got it on one of the dvd's that came with either 8 or 9, not sure which. Maybe it came with both versions. Hope that helps. Kev > Hi. > Autotune 7 works fine as an insert effect in pt, and yes, the parameters > do show up with voice over. As a matter of fact, you see more stuff here > than you do when using it as a VST in windows with Sonar, haven't tried > it with reaper though. Some folks like meladyn but I don't even know if > that is available as an rtas plug. > Gord > > -Original Message- From: Christopher-Mark Gilland > Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2011 6:20 AM > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com > Subject: Auto-Tune V7 > > Has anyone had much success with tweeking the settings of the Auto-Tune > plugin after insertting it on an audio track? I know some 3rd party > plugins > work, but others simply put, don't. Was just wonderring if this is one a > those that simply won't, unless you like the default settings, which I > kind > a ish, do, but it would be nice to modify them if ever needed, admittedly. > > Also, are there any other pitch correction plugins aside auto-tune that I > could maybe try a demo of to see how I like? > > Chris. >>> >>> Chuck Reichel >>> 954-742-0019 >>> www.SoundPictureRecording.com >>> >>> >>> >> > > Chuck Reichel > 954-742-0019 > www.SoundPictureRecording.com > > >
Re: Auto-Tune V7
Hi David, What is a "Garget" note? LOL Do you mean Target note? Talk soon On Oct 17, 2011, at 12:01 PM, David Eagle wrote: So does that mean we have access to the Garget Notes Via Midi option Gord? As for the question regarding how to get to the parameters, I can't answer that because I'm not using ProTools at the moment. I will be very shortly though. Thanks On 17 Oct 2011, at 13:12, Chuck Reichel wrote: Hi Kevin, You are accurate now! Melodyne is useless except in stand alone mode! I am still thinking about upgrading my Autotune to Autotune 7, as waves Tune for pitch correction is still inches away from being VoiceOver friendly! BTW I got my PT 9. upgrade from Washing pro not Avid, must have been a long session day! LOL Talk soon On Oct 17, 2011, at 5:17 AM, Kevin Reeves wrote: Hey man. Actually, what comes on the CD is Melodyne, not Autotune. BUt it doesn't come as a download from the site. It's only available as one of the disks that ship. Hope that helps. Kevin Hey Kevin,I got PT 9.3 from the avid site! Where is Autotune located? On Oct 16, 2011, at 8:51 PM, Kevin Reeves wrote: Hey gord. It is indeed available as rtas, and comes as a free light version with your purchase of Pro Tools. I think you've got it on one of the dvd's that came with either 8 or 9, not sure which. Maybe it came with both versions. Hope that helps. Kev Hi. Autotune 7 works fine as an insert effect in pt, and yes, the parameters do show up with voice over. As a matter of fact, you see more stuff here than you do when using it as a VST in windows with Sonar, haven't tried it with reaper though. Some folks like meladyn but I don't even know if that is available as an rtas plug. Gord -Original Message- From: Christopher-Mark Gilland Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2011 6:20 AM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Auto-Tune V7 Has anyone had much success with tweeking the settings of the Auto-Tune plugin after insertting it on an audio track? I know some 3rd party plugins work, but others simply put, don't. Was just wonderring if this is one a those that simply won't, unless you like the default settings, which I kind a ish, do, but it would be nice to modify them if ever needed, admittedly. Also, are there any other pitch correction plugins aside auto- tune that I could maybe try a demo of to see how I like? Chris. Chuck Reichel 954-742-0019 www.SoundPictureRecording.com Chuck Reichel 954-742-0019 www.SoundPictureRecording.com Chuck Reichel 954-742-0019 www.SoundPictureRecording.com
Re: recommendation for a good rtas channel strip
Hi Monkey & Gordon, If you have the Horse power use separate inserts for each Plug-in. After all you have 10 of them in PT! If you want the waves fader mapping contact me off list. Once you hear the Waves H-comp you'll never go back! LOL From my experience channel strips have tons of stuff to manage in the same plug window and even with a control 24 with 24 faders you half to bank down to much to get to what you want to manipulate. YMMV Talk soon On Oct 17, 2011, at 11:29 AM, Monkey Pusher wrote: The waves stuff does have some RTAS plugs as well, however they aren't very accessible at-least with out mapping the control to a control surface from what i have read on here. However From what i understand the Izotope stuff should be VO friendly and Izotope said that do do some basic VO testing with all their Plugs now and welcome feedback. Nectar is their vocal channel strip, alloy is there general purpose channel strip, and ozone is their mastering oriented channel strip. I believe there should be free demos on the www.izotope.com site to check out. Been meaning to check these out and post my experiences myself, but working on mastering editing with PT before i get back into mixing again so haven't gotten around to it yet. Post your experiences please if you try them before i do. On 10/16/11, Gordon Kent wrote: Are there any good channel strip plugs that will work with VO and PT. It seems that most of the waves stuff is for native setups, but maybe I have that wrong. I would just like to get something better than the stock eq's and compressor. The factory plug-ins have been around since pt6 and maybe earlier than that. The bomb factory compressor is a bit better, but it would be nice to have a strip with comp/eq/tube distortion etc. Gord -Original Message- From: Slau Halatyn Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2011 11:20 AM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Master Tracks? No worries, I didn't take it that way at all. It's definitely an aspect of using the master track that one should consider. At this point, I think the issue of pre versus post fader compression is beyond the question when someone is just trying to get their head around Pro Tools in general, that'sl all. Cheers, Slau On Oct 16, 2011, at 11:03 AM, Stephen Martin wrote: I do agree with you, and i do apologize if i came off as trying to correct you or saying you shouldn't put a compressor on the master track. It was intended more as a suggestion or tip that i came across in my own journey in learning more about PT, and figured i'd would share another way of doing it with the list. On Oct 16, 2011, at 10:49 AM, Slau Halatyn wrote: As with most things, there's more than one way to accomplish a task and this is one of them. Some people put compressors on the master track, some don't. I'm simply illustrating one of its uses. Slau On Oct 16, 2011, at 10:02 AM, Stephen Martin wrote: I have read in a few places where they don't always recommend putting a master compressor on the master track, since the master track unlike all the other tracks in pro tools has the fader before the inserts and sends, which means if u put a compressor on the master track, set it up how u like, then later adjust the master fader, it will pretty much cause you to have to go redo the compressor settings. A work around is to create a sub mimix aux track and send all your tracks to that, add all your master effects on that track and output that to the master track. On Oct 16, 2011, at 9:54 AM, Slau Halatyn wrote: Christopher, Master tracks control the output level being fed to an output bus. Most often, a master track will control the main left and right outputs for a stereo mix. It's not necessary to necessarily use a master track for a regular mix but it certainly does help to create a master track to see the combined level of all of the individual tracks on the master track's level meter. Further, when putting bus compression over an entire mix, it would normally be done with a compressor plug-in on a master track. Finally, master tracks are used when creating stems for surround mixes, alternate mixes, instrumental versions, etc. Again, most people just use a single master track for overall mix purposes. HTH, Slau Chuck Reichel 954-742-0019 www.SoundPictureRecording.com
Re: Auto-Tune V7
No, I meant Garget Note. You're obviously too far out of the loop! :) On 17 Oct 2011, at 17:44, Chuck Reichel wrote: > Hi David, > What is a "Garget" note? LOL > Do you mean Target note? > Talk soon > > > > On Oct 17, 2011, at 12:01 PM, David Eagle wrote: > >> So does that mean we have access to the Garget Notes Via Midi option Gord? >> >> As for the question regarding how to get to the parameters, I can't answer >> that because I'm not using ProTools at the moment. I will be very shortly >> though. >> Thanks >> >> >> On 17 Oct 2011, at 13:12, Chuck Reichel wrote: >> >>> Hi Kevin, >>> You are accurate now! Melodyne is useless except in stand alone mode! >>> I am still thinking about upgrading my Autotune to Autotune 7, as waves >>> Tune for pitch correction is still inches away from being VoiceOver >>> friendly! >>> BTW I got my PT 9. upgrade from Washing pro not Avid, must have been a long >>> session day! LOL >>> Talk soon >>> >>> >>> >>> On Oct 17, 2011, at 5:17 AM, Kevin Reeves wrote: >>> Hey man. Actually, what comes on the CD is Melodyne, not Autotune. BUt it doesn't come as a download from the site. It's only available as one of the disks that ship. Hope that helps. Kevin > Hey Kevin,I got PT 9.3 from the avid site! > Where is Autotune located? > > On Oct 16, 2011, at 8:51 PM, Kevin Reeves wrote: > >> Hey gord. It is indeed available as rtas, and comes as a free light >> version with your purchase of Pro Tools. I think you've got it on one of >> the dvd's that came with either 8 or 9, not sure which. Maybe it came >> with both versions. Hope that helps. >> >> Kev >> >>> Hi. >>> Autotune 7 works fine as an insert effect in pt, and yes, the >>> parameters do show up with voice over. As a matter of fact, you see >>> more stuff here than you do when using it as a VST in windows with >>> Sonar, haven't tried it with reaper though. Some folks like meladyn >>> but I don't even know if that is available as an rtas plug. >>> Gord >>> >>> -Original Message- From: Christopher-Mark Gilland >>> Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2011 6:20 AM >>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com >>> Subject: Auto-Tune V7 >>> >>> Has anyone had much success with tweeking the settings of the Auto-Tune >>> plugin after insertting it on an audio track? I know some 3rd party >>> plugins >>> work, but others simply put, don't. Was just wonderring if this is one >>> a >>> those that simply won't, unless you like the default settings, which I >>> kind >>> a ish, do, but it would be nice to modify them if ever needed, >>> admittedly. >>> >>> Also, are there any other pitch correction plugins aside auto-tune that >>> I >>> could maybe try a demo of to see how I like? >>> >>> Chris. >> > > Chuck Reichel > 954-742-0019 > www.SoundPictureRecording.com > > > >>> >>> Chuck Reichel >>> 954-742-0019 >>> www.SoundPictureRecording.com >>> >>> >>> >> > > Chuck Reichel > 954-742-0019 > www.SoundPictureRecording.com > > >
Re: recommendation for a good rtas channel strip
Oh I have the horse power. I was just looking for better stuff than the stock digi stuff. I have so much great vst stuff around, especially the uad plugs so I'm spoiled. Gord -Original Message- From: Chuck Reichel Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 1:08 PM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: recommendation for a good rtas channel strip Hi Monkey & Gordon, If you have the Horse power use separate inserts for each Plug-in. After all you have 10 of them in PT! If you want the waves fader mapping contact me off list. Once you hear the Waves H-comp you'll never go back! LOL From my experience channel strips have tons of stuff to manage in the same plug window and even with a control 24 with 24 faders you half to bank down to much to get to what you want to manipulate. YMMV Talk soon On Oct 17, 2011, at 11:29 AM, Monkey Pusher wrote: The waves stuff does have some RTAS plugs as well, however they aren't very accessible at-least with out mapping the control to a control surface from what i have read on here. However From what i understand the Izotope stuff should be VO friendly and Izotope said that do do some basic VO testing with all their Plugs now and welcome feedback. Nectar is their vocal channel strip, alloy is there general purpose channel strip, and ozone is their mastering oriented channel strip. I believe there should be free demos on the www.izotope.com site to check out. Been meaning to check these out and post my experiences myself, but working on mastering editing with PT before i get back into mixing again so haven't gotten around to it yet. Post your experiences please if you try them before i do. On 10/16/11, Gordon Kent wrote: Are there any good channel strip plugs that will work with VO and PT. It seems that most of the waves stuff is for native setups, but maybe I have that wrong. I would just like to get something better than the stock eq's and compressor. The factory plug-ins have been around since pt6 and maybe earlier than that. The bomb factory compressor is a bit better, but it would be nice to have a strip with comp/eq/tube distortion etc. Gord -Original Message- From: Slau Halatyn Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2011 11:20 AM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Master Tracks? No worries, I didn't take it that way at all. It's definitely an aspect of using the master track that one should consider. At this point, I think the issue of pre versus post fader compression is beyond the question when someone is just trying to get their head around Pro Tools in general, that'sl all. Cheers, Slau On Oct 16, 2011, at 11:03 AM, Stephen Martin wrote: I do agree with you, and i do apologize if i came off as trying to correct you or saying you shouldn't put a compressor on the master track. It was intended more as a suggestion or tip that i came across in my own journey in learning more about PT, and figured i'd would share another way of doing it with the list. On Oct 16, 2011, at 10:49 AM, Slau Halatyn wrote: As with most things, there's more than one way to accomplish a task and this is one of them. Some people put compressors on the master track, some don't. I'm simply illustrating one of its uses. Slau On Oct 16, 2011, at 10:02 AM, Stephen Martin wrote: I have read in a few places where they don't always recommend putting a master compressor on the master track, since the master track unlike all the other tracks in pro tools has the fader before the inserts and sends, which means if u put a compressor on the master track, set it up how u like, then later adjust the master fader, it will pretty much cause you to have to go redo the compressor settings. A work around is to create a sub mimix aux track and send all your tracks to that, add all your master effects on that track and output that to the master track. On Oct 16, 2011, at 9:54 AM, Slau Halatyn wrote: Christopher, Master tracks control the output level being fed to an output bus. Most often, a master track will control the main left and right outputs for a stereo mix. It's not necessary to necessarily use a master track for a regular mix but it certainly does help to create a master track to see the combined level of all of the individual tracks on the master track's level meter. Further, when putting bus compression over an entire mix, it would normally be done with a compressor plug-in on a master track. Finally, master tracks are used when creating stems for surround mixes, alternate mixes, instrumental versions, etc. Again, most people just use a single master track for overall mix purposes. HTH, Slau Chuck Reichel 954-742-0019 www.SoundPictureRecording.com
Re: recommendation for a good rtas channel strip
The UAD stuff is killer by all accounts. It's likely I'll opt for that shortly. I was a fly on the wall, actually, a diner at a table, along with Chuck Ainlay, Frank Filipetti, Ed Cherney, George Massenberg, Phil Ramone and Al Schmitt and they absolutely praised the latest UA plugs. Slau On Oct 17, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Gordon Kent wrote: > Oh I have the horse power. I was just looking for better stuff than the > stock digi stuff. I have so much great vst stuff around, especially the uad > plugs so I'm spoiled. > Gord > > -Original Message- From: Chuck Reichel > Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 1:08 PM > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: recommendation for a good rtas channel strip > > Hi Monkey & Gordon, > If you have the Horse power use separate inserts for each Plug-in. > After all you have 10 of them in PT! > If you want the waves fader mapping contact me off list. > Once you hear the Waves H-comp you'll never go back! LOL > From my experience channel strips have tons of stuff to manage in the > same plug window and even with a control 24 with 24 faders you half to > bank down to much to get to what you want to manipulate. > > YMMV > > Talk soon > > > On Oct 17, 2011, at 11:29 AM, Monkey Pusher wrote: > >> The waves stuff does have some RTAS plugs as well, however they >> aren't very accessible at-least with out mapping the control to a >> control surface from what i have read on here. However From what i >> understand the Izotope stuff should be VO friendly and Izotope said >> that do do some basic VO testing with all their Plugs now and welcome >> feedback. Nectar is their vocal channel strip, alloy is there general >> purpose channel strip, and ozone is their mastering oriented channel >> strip. I believe there should be free demos on the www.izotope.com >> site to check out. Been meaning to check these out and post my >> experiences myself, but working on mastering editing with PT before i >> get back into mixing again so haven't gotten around to it yet. Post >> your experiences please if you try them before i do. >> >> On 10/16/11, Gordon Kent wrote: >>> Are there any good channel strip plugs that will work with VO and PT. It >>> seems that most of the waves stuff is for native setups, but maybe I have >>> that wrong. I would just like to get something better than the stock eq's >>> and compressor. The factory plug-ins have been around since pt6 and maybe >>> earlier than that. The bomb factory compressor is a bit better, but it >>> would be nice to have a strip with comp/eq/tube distortion etc. >>> Gord >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Slau Halatyn >>> Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2011 11:20 AM >>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com >>> Subject: Re: Master Tracks? >>> >>> No worries, I didn't take it that way at all. It's definitely an aspect of >>> using the master track that one should consider. At this point, I think the >>> issue of pre versus post fader compression is beyond the question when >>> someone is just trying to get their head around Pro Tools in general, >>> that'sl all. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Slau >>> >>> On Oct 16, 2011, at 11:03 AM, Stephen Martin wrote: >>> I do agree with you, and i do apologize if i came off as trying to correct you or saying you shouldn't put a compressor on the master track. It was intended more as a suggestion or tip that i came across in my own journey in learning more about PT, and figured i'd would share another way of doing it with the list. On Oct 16, 2011, at 10:49 AM, Slau Halatyn wrote: > As with most things, there's more than one way to accomplish a task and > this is one of them. Some people put compressors on the master track, > some don't. I'm simply illustrating one of its uses. > > Slau > > On Oct 16, 2011, at 10:02 AM, Stephen Martin wrote: > >> I have read in a few places where they don't always recommend putting a >> >> master compressor on the master track, since the master track unlike all >> >> the other tracks in pro tools has the fader before the inserts and >> sends, which means if u put a compressor on the master track, set it up >> how u like, then later adjust the master fader, it will pretty much >> cause you to have to go redo the compressor settings. A work around is >> to create a sub mimix aux track and send all your tracks to that, add >> all your master effects on that track and output that to the master >> track. >> >> On Oct 16, 2011, at 9:54 AM, Slau Halatyn wrote: >> >>> Christopher, >>> >>> Master tracks control the output level being fed to an output bus. Most >>> >>> often, a master track will control the main left and right outputs for >>> a stereo mix. It's not necessary to necessarily use a master track for >>> a regular mix but it certainly does help to create a master
Re: recommendation for a good rtas channel strip
Hi Gordon, I have heard good stuff about "uad plugs" Are they accessible with VoiceOver is my first question. and how much? What channel strips from uad would you recommend? Talk soon On Oct 17, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Gordon Kent wrote: Oh I have the horse power. I was just looking for better stuff than the stock digi stuff. I have so much great vst stuff around, especially the uad plugs so I'm spoiled. Gord -Original Message- From: Chuck Reichel Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 1:08 PM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: recommendation for a good rtas channel strip Hi Monkey & Gordon, If you have the Horse power use separate inserts for each Plug-in. After all you have 10 of them in PT! If you want the waves fader mapping contact me off list. Once you hear the Waves H-comp you'll never go back! LOL From my experience channel strips have tons of stuff to manage in the same plug window and even with a control 24 with 24 faders you half to bank down to much to get to what you want to manipulate. YMMV Talk soon On Oct 17, 2011, at 11:29 AM, Monkey Pusher wrote: The waves stuff does have some RTAS plugs as well, however they aren't very accessible at-least with out mapping the control to a control surface from what i have read on here. However From what i understand the Izotope stuff should be VO friendly and Izotope said that do do some basic VO testing with all their Plugs now and welcome feedback. Nectar is their vocal channel strip, alloy is there general purpose channel strip, and ozone is their mastering oriented channel strip. I believe there should be free demos on the www.izotope.com site to check out. Been meaning to check these out and post my experiences myself, but working on mastering editing with PT before i get back into mixing again so haven't gotten around to it yet. Post your experiences please if you try them before i do. On 10/16/11, Gordon Kent wrote: Are there any good channel strip plugs that will work with VO and PT. It seems that most of the waves stuff is for native setups, but maybe I have that wrong. I would just like to get something better than the stock eq's and compressor. The factory plug-ins have been around since pt6 and maybe earlier than that. The bomb factory compressor is a bit better, but it would be nice to have a strip with comp/eq/tube distortion etc. Gord -Original Message- From: Slau Halatyn Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2011 11:20 AM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Master Tracks? No worries, I didn't take it that way at all. It's definitely an aspect of using the master track that one should consider. At this point, I think the issue of pre versus post fader compression is beyond the question when someone is just trying to get their head around Pro Tools in general, that'sl all. Cheers, Slau On Oct 16, 2011, at 11:03 AM, Stephen Martin wrote: I do agree with you, and i do apologize if i came off as trying to correct you or saying you shouldn't put a compressor on the master track. It was intended more as a suggestion or tip that i came across in my own journey in learning more about PT, and figured i'd would share another way of doing it with the list. On Oct 16, 2011, at 10:49 AM, Slau Halatyn wrote: As with most things, there's more than one way to accomplish a task and this is one of them. Some people put compressors on the master track, some don't. I'm simply illustrating one of its uses. Slau On Oct 16, 2011, at 10:02 AM, Stephen Martin wrote: I have read in a few places where they don't always recommend putting a master compressor on the master track, since the master track unlike all the other tracks in pro tools has the fader before the inserts and sends, which means if u put a compressor on the master track, set it up how u like, then later adjust the master fader, it will pretty much cause you to have to go redo the compressor settings. A work around is to create a sub mimix aux track and send all your tracks to that, add all your master effects on that track and output that to the master track. On Oct 16, 2011, at 9:54 AM, Slau Halatyn wrote: Christopher, Master tracks control the output level being fed to an output bus. Most often, a master track will control the main left and right outputs for a stereo mix. It's not necessary to necessarily use a master track for a regular mix but it certainly does help to create a master track to see the combined level of all of the individual tracks on the master track's level meter. Further, when putting bus compression over an entire mix, it would normally be done with a compressor plug- in on a master track. Finally, master tracks are used when creating stems for surround mixes, alternate mixes, instrumental versions, etc. Again, most people just use a single master track for overall mix purposes. HTH, Slau Chuck Reich
Re: recommendation for a good rtas channel strip
Hi: Well, I only use them on windows because I have the pci card which isn't supported on the mac. I would need to get the firewire interface to use it on the mac and the word on the street is that it can only be used during mixdown because of latency issues. And it would be a pretty expensive proposition because I would have to buy second licenses for all the plugs I would want to use. Gord -Original Message- From: Chuck Reichel Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 3:09 PM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: recommendation for a good rtas channel strip Hi Gordon, I have heard good stuff about "uad plugs" Are they accessible with VoiceOver is my first question. and how much? What channel strips from uad would you recommend? Talk soon On Oct 17, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Gordon Kent wrote: Oh I have the horse power. I was just looking for better stuff than the stock digi stuff. I have so much great vst stuff around, especially the uad plugs so I'm spoiled. Gord -Original Message- From: Chuck Reichel Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 1:08 PM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: recommendation for a good rtas channel strip Hi Monkey & Gordon, If you have the Horse power use separate inserts for each Plug-in. After all you have 10 of them in PT! If you want the waves fader mapping contact me off list. Once you hear the Waves H-comp you'll never go back! LOL From my experience channel strips have tons of stuff to manage in the same plug window and even with a control 24 with 24 faders you half to bank down to much to get to what you want to manipulate. YMMV Talk soon On Oct 17, 2011, at 11:29 AM, Monkey Pusher wrote: The waves stuff does have some RTAS plugs as well, however they aren't very accessible at-least with out mapping the control to a control surface from what i have read on here. However From what i understand the Izotope stuff should be VO friendly and Izotope said that do do some basic VO testing with all their Plugs now and welcome feedback. Nectar is their vocal channel strip, alloy is there general purpose channel strip, and ozone is their mastering oriented channel strip. I believe there should be free demos on the www.izotope.com site to check out. Been meaning to check these out and post my experiences myself, but working on mastering editing with PT before i get back into mixing again so haven't gotten around to it yet. Post your experiences please if you try them before i do. On 10/16/11, Gordon Kent wrote: Are there any good channel strip plugs that will work with VO and PT. It seems that most of the waves stuff is for native setups, but maybe I have that wrong. I would just like to get something better than the stock eq's and compressor. The factory plug-ins have been around since pt6 and maybe earlier than that. The bomb factory compressor is a bit better, but it would be nice to have a strip with comp/eq/tube distortion etc. Gord -Original Message- From: Slau Halatyn Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2011 11:20 AM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Master Tracks? No worries, I didn't take it that way at all. It's definitely an aspect of using the master track that one should consider. At this point, I think the issue of pre versus post fader compression is beyond the question when someone is just trying to get their head around Pro Tools in general, that'sl all. Cheers, Slau On Oct 16, 2011, at 11:03 AM, Stephen Martin wrote: I do agree with you, and i do apologize if i came off as trying to correct you or saying you shouldn't put a compressor on the master track. It was intended more as a suggestion or tip that i came across in my own journey in learning more about PT, and figured i'd would share another way of doing it with the list. On Oct 16, 2011, at 10:49 AM, Slau Halatyn wrote: As with most things, there's more than one way to accomplish a task and this is one of them. Some people put compressors on the master track, some don't. I'm simply illustrating one of its uses. Slau On Oct 16, 2011, at 10:02 AM, Stephen Martin wrote: I have read in a few places where they don't always recommend putting a master compressor on the master track, since the master track unlike all the other tracks in pro tools has the fader before the inserts and sends, which means if u put a compressor on the master track, set it up how u like, then later adjust the master fader, it will pretty much cause you to have to go redo the compressor settings. A work around is to create a sub mimix aux track and send all your tracks to that, add all your master effects on that track and output that to the master track. On Oct 16, 2011, at 9:54 AM, Slau Halatyn wrote: Christopher, Master tracks control the output level being fed to an output bus. Most often, a master track will control the main left and right outputs for a stereo mix. It's not necessary to necessarily
