Hi Gordon,
I have heard good stuff about "uad plugs"
Are they accessible with VoiceOver is my first question.
and how much?
What channel strips from uad would you recommend?
Talk soon
On Oct 17, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Gordon Kent wrote:
Oh I have the horse power. I was just looking for better stuff than
the stock digi stuff. I have so much great vst stuff around,
especially the uad plugs so I'm spoiled.
Gord
-----Original Message----- From: Chuck Reichel
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 1:08 PM
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: recommendation for a good rtas channel strip
Hi Monkey & Gordon,
If you have the Horse power use separate inserts for each Plug-in.
After all you have 10 of them in PT!
If you want the waves fader mapping contact me off list.
Once you hear the Waves H-comp you'll never go back! LOL
From my experience channel strips have tons of stuff to manage in the
same plug window and even with a control 24 with 24 faders you half to
bank down to much to get to what you want to manipulate.
YMMV
Talk soon
On Oct 17, 2011, at 11:29 AM, Monkey Pusher wrote:
The waves stuff does have some RTAS plugs as well, however they
aren't very accessible at-least with out mapping the control to a
control surface from what i have read on here. However From what i
understand the Izotope stuff should be VO friendly and Izotope said
that do do some basic VO testing with all their Plugs now and welcome
feedback. Nectar is their vocal channel strip, alloy is there general
purpose channel strip, and ozone is their mastering oriented channel
strip. I believe there should be free demos on the www.izotope.com
site to check out. Been meaning to check these out and post my
experiences myself, but working on mastering editing with PT
before i
get back into mixing again so haven't gotten around to it yet. Post
your experiences please if you try them before i do.
On 10/16/11, Gordon Kent <dbmu...@cybernex.net> wrote:
Are there any good channel strip plugs that will work with VO and
PT. It
seems that most of the waves stuff is for native setups, but
maybe I have
that wrong. I would just like to get something better than the
stock eq's
and compressor. The factory plug-ins have been around since pt6
and maybe
earlier than that. The bomb factory compressor is a bit better,
but it
would be nice to have a strip with comp/eq/tube distortion etc.
Gord
-----Original Message-----
From: Slau Halatyn
Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2011 11:20 AM
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Master Tracks?
No worries, I didn't take it that way at all. It's definitely an
aspect of
using the master track that one should consider. At this point, I
think the
issue of pre versus post fader compression is beyond the question
when
someone is just trying to get their head around Pro Tools in
general,
that'sl all.
Cheers,
Slau
On Oct 16, 2011, at 11:03 AM, Stephen Martin wrote:
I do agree with you, and i do apologize if i came off as trying
to correct
you or saying you shouldn't put a compressor on the master
track. It was
intended more as a suggestion or tip that i came across in my
own journey
in learning more about PT, and figured i'd would share another
way of
doing it with the list.
On Oct 16, 2011, at 10:49 AM, Slau Halatyn wrote:
As with most things, there's more than one way to accomplish a
task and
this is one of them. Some people put compressors on the master
track,
some don't. I'm simply illustrating one of its uses.
Slau
On Oct 16, 2011, at 10:02 AM, Stephen Martin wrote:
I have read in a few places where they don't always recommend
putting a
master compressor on the master track, since the master track
unlike all
the other tracks in pro tools has the fader before the inserts
and
sends, which means if u put a compressor on the master track,
set it up
how u like, then later adjust the master fader, it will pretty
much
cause you to have to go redo the compressor settings. A work
around is
to create a sub mimix aux track and send all your tracks to
that, add
all your master effects on that track and output that to the
master
track.
On Oct 16, 2011, at 9:54 AM, Slau Halatyn wrote:
Christopher,
Master tracks control the output level being fed to an output
bus. Most
often, a master track will control the main left and right
outputs for
a stereo mix. It's not necessary to necessarily use a master
track for
a regular mix but it certainly does help to create a master
track to
see the combined level of all of the individual tracks on the
master
track's level meter. Further, when putting bus compression
over an
entire mix, it would normally be done with a compressor plug-
in on a
master track. Finally, master tracks are used when creating
stems for
surround mixes, alternate mixes, instrumental versions, etc.
Again,
most people just use a single master track for overall mix
purposes.
HTH,
Slau
Chuck Reichel
954-742-0019
www.SoundPictureRecording.com
Chuck Reichel
954-742-0019
www.SoundPictureRecording.com
