Re: Pro Tools 10 and Mountain Lion
Thanks Slau, We made a Lion DVD, and as soon as this machine arrives, down it goes. Now, we wait. Cheers, Naama -- Naama Samantha Shang Audio Technician Talking Book Library Natanya, Israel +972-9-861-7110 na...@clfb.org.il -- From: "Slau Halatyn" Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 3:59 PM To: Subject: Re: Pro Tools 10 and Mountain Lion Hi Naama, Absolutely, you'll need either Snow Leopard or Lion for now. Also, Pro Tools 9 would be recommended. Anything higher than 8.0.4 is fine but, if at all possible, try to stay away from version 10. If it has to be 10, then that's workable too. slau On Aug 22, 2012, at 12:38 AM, Naama Samantha Shang wrote: Hi Slau, So I just want to make sure I'm clear - as soon as my work machine arrives, do I downgrade to Lion before anything else, to avoid problems? Thanks, Naama -- Naama Samantha Shang Audio Technician Talking Book Library Natanya, Israel +972-9-861-7110 na...@clfb.org.il -- From: "Slau Halatyn" Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 6:51 PM To: Subject: Re: Pro Tools 10 and Mountain Lion No sarcasm at all. I just didn't want to misunderstand anything since I currently don't use Mountain Lion. The vagaries of communication lead to misunderstandings and I just needed to absolutely sure that at least one person was categorically unable to read the start field with PT 10 under Mountain Lion. Cheers, Slau On Aug 21, 2012, at 11:11 AM, Chris Norman wrote: Haha, not sure if that was sarcasm or not, but no worries anyways. On 21/08/2012, Slau Halatyn wrote: OK, thanks for confirming that in no uncertain terms. Cheers On Aug 20, 2012, at 10:44 PM, Chris Norman wrote: OK, lemme try and lay this out as clearly and fully as I know it. I can't try pt 9 on Mountain Lion, or I would, but with PT10: In the edit window, when you interact with the counter display, none of the values there will read. That is to say, the start, current, and end selection boxes. They just say text or something like that. As people have said, the same is true of the edit boxes in the tempo settings, and I'd bet it's the same in the time signature configuration thingy too. I'd be willing to put money on it being the text fields that Avid use, that require you to use the numberpad to enter data. Other than that, everything else is working healthily, hardware, etc, etc, etc. Cheers, and hope that clears it up a bit Slau. If you need to know anything else, please let me know. Cheers, On 20/08/2012, The Oreo Monster wrote: Hello, You can also try going to the events menu and tempo and constant tempo, you see it does the same thing there. Infact you will notice it does the same in all edit fields in all of the different event dialog boxes. The Oreo Monster monkeypushe...@gmail.com On Aug 20, 2012, at 4:01 PM, "J. R. Westmoreland" wrote: Interact with the counters area and there are several there. -Original Message- From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Nick Gawronski Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 1:59 PM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Pro Tools 10 and Mountain Lion Hi, Where should I go in pro tools to see if these fields work as I am still in the process of learning pro tools? I should be able to let you know if the proper fields read if I am told where to go and I will also try it on my lion installation to see the difference. Nick Gawronski On 8/19/2012 6:41 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote: Nick, Can you read the Start field in the edit window under Mountain Lion in Pro Tools 10? Slau On Aug 19, 2012, at 6:57 PM, Nick Gawronski wrote: Hi, Some edit fields read fine like the file names to save projects as and when you bounce tracks to files. I am using mountain lion but do have lion still around should I need it. I think it is possible to down grade to lion if you need to but don't know if the newer mac books will support the down grade. My digi 003 works fine under mountain lion and I did not need to reinstall anything. The only thing I had to reinstall was the drivers for my express card for my sata drive and that was not even an upgrade I just opened the folder where I had the pkg file and ran it and things now work great again. Nick Gawronski On 8/18/2012 10:15 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote: So, am I understanding this correctly? With Mountain Lion, no edit fields are being read in Pro Tools versions 9 and 10? Can someone else confirm this? Version 10 reads fine with Snow Leopard and Lion, from other accounts. On Aug 18, 2012, at 10:07 PM, The Oreo Monster wrote: Hello, It appears to be an edit field where there would be text you could edit or change thats not reading in ML with PT10. This issue doesn't happen with PT 9 or 10 on lion. And if i remember correctly PT 9 on ML had the same issue. As i was planning to keep my air running PT 9 in case i
Re: Question about Pianoteq
There's like 10 or so of them. What you could do is buy the Mainstage pack. It's only 30 bucks in the app store. Then, these sounds will play in Garageband. It's about 15 gb of awesome sounds. Kevin
Re: Question about Pianoteq
Ivory. On Aug 22, 2012, at 11:43 AM, Christopher-Mark gilland wrote: > Presets for what? Ivery, or for Pianoteq. > > Chris. > > - Original Message - From: "Kevin Reeves" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 10:41 AM > Subject: Re: Question about Pianoteq > > > Gordon Kent actually created all the presets using windows and saved them out > and imported them back into the mac. > > Windows pro tools was accessible enough to do at least that much. > > Kevin=
Re: Pro Tools 10 and Mountain Lion
I never ever got that trick to work, personally. Once I removed the A A X folder, all my plugins totally went byeBy. Not only were they! no longer there, but! neither were my RTass ones either. Eek! Yikes! Chris. - Original Message - From: "Nick Gawronski" To: Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 2:59 PM Subject: Re: Pro Tools 10 and Mountain Lion Hi, There was a message postted on this list about how to fix this AAX plugin thing and once it is done your RTAS plugins should show up again so 10.2 would be completely usable then as I did this when I had it installed but forget what it is currently it involves something in the avid folder there is a folder called plugins and in that folder removing the AAX folder. I also have the original 10.0 DVD and it was also talked about to uncheck avid effects in the installation not sure if this helps or not but wanted to say it worked on my system before I reinstalled mountain lion. Nick Gawronski On 8/22/2012 10:58 AM, Chris Norman wrote: Hiya, think I messed up the sending of this email, but if not, sorry for the double post. Firstly, Slau, it's no worries mate, I just wasn't sure if you were being tongue in cheek or not, but I thought I'd better lay it on a plate so there was no ambiguity. :-) J R, I am using Pro Tools 10 on my meager setup, and it works fine. The only real show stopper is that the plugins have all been converted to the AAX format, which I'm sure is lovely, but it renders the configurable parameters completely unconfigurable LOL. It is worth noting that not all plugins are in AAX, XPand for example, is still an RTAS, so it works fine, as are a few others. The isn't usually that much of a problem anyways, because there's a whole plethora of presets to choose from, but for example, with the Normalise Audio Sweet plugin, there's no presets, so I cannot normalise my stuff. Anyways, hope that's cleared up some stuff. On 22/08/2012, J. R. Westmoreland wrote: Slau, Can you briefly tell me why you have concerns about PT10? I used it a few months back for my class for recording and editing and it pretty much did as I expected. The isues I ran into were related to areas that had problems under both v9 and v10. Sorry if this is being stupid or whatever I'm just curious since I actually have the real versions of both and licenses for them as well. Thanks in advance and if it seems better go ahead and write me off list. Best, J. R. -Original Message- From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Slau Halatyn Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 7:00 AM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Pro Tools 10 and Mountain Lion Hi Naama, Absolutely, you'll need either Snow Leopard or Lion for now. Also, Pro Tools 9 would be recommended. Anything higher than 8.0.4 is fine but, if at all possible, try to stay away from version 10. If it has to be 10, then that's workable too. slau On Aug 22, 2012, at 12:38 AM, Naama Samantha Shang wrote: Hi Slau, So I just want to make sure I'm clear - as soon as my work machine arrives, do I downgrade to Lion before anything else, to avoid problems? Thanks, Naama -- Naama Samantha Shang Audio Technician Talking Book Library Natanya, Israel +972-9-861-7110 na...@clfb.org.il -- From: "Slau Halatyn" Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 6:51 PM To: Subject: Re: Pro Tools 10 and Mountain Lion No sarcasm at all. I just didn't want to misunderstand anything since I currently don't use Mountain Lion. The vagaries of communication lead to misunderstandings and I just needed to absolutely sure that at least one person was categorically unable to read the start field with PT 10 under Mountain Lion. Cheers, Slau On Aug 21, 2012, at 11:11 AM, Chris Norman wrote: Haha, not sure if that was sarcasm or not, but no worries anyways. On 21/08/2012, Slau Halatyn wrote: OK, thanks for confirming that in no uncertain terms. Cheers On Aug 20, 2012, at 10:44 PM, Chris Norman wrote: OK, lemme try and lay this out as clearly and fully as I know it. I can't try pt 9 on Mountain Lion, or I would, but with PT10: In the edit window, when you interact with the counter display, none of the values there will read. That is to say, the start, current, and end selection boxes. They just say text or something like that. As people have said, the same is true of the edit boxes in the tempo settings, and I'd bet it's the same in the time signature configuration thingy too. I'd be willing to put money on it being the text fields that Avid use, that require you to use the numberpad to enter data. Other than that, everything else is working healthily, hardware, etc, etc, etc. Cheers, and hope that clears it up a bit Slau. If you need to know anything else, please let me know. Cheers, On 20/08/2012, The Oreo Monster wrote: Hello, You can also try going to the events menu and tempo and constant tempo,
Re: Pro Tools 10 and Mountain Lion
Hi J.R., The issues, as I understand, are specifically associated with Pro Tools 10.2 under Mountain Lion. Of most concern is the reading of text areas. It's an operating system-specific problem which may or may not be an issue when Pro Tools 10 becomes Mountain Lion compatible. Regardless of whether Pro tools 10 is capable of running without immediately crashing under Mountain Lion is beside the point. It still hasn't been approved and, as usual, there will be changes in the specific version that is first first officially compatible with Mountain Lion. Hope that clears it up. Slau On Aug 22, 2012, at 9:50 AM, J. R. Westmoreland wrote: > Slau, > > Can you briefly tell me why you have concerns about PT10? I used it a few > months back for my class for recording and editing and it pretty much did as > I expected. > The isues I ran into were related to areas that had problems under both v9 > and v10. > Sorry if this is being stupid or whatever I'm just curious since I actually > have the real versions of both and licenses for them as well. > Thanks in advance and if it seems better go ahead and write me off list. > > Best, > J. R. > > > -Original Message- > From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf > Of Slau Halatyn > Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 7:00 AM > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: Pro Tools 10 and Mountain Lion > > Hi Naama, > > Absolutely, you'll need either Snow Leopard or Lion for now. Also, Pro Tools > 9 would be recommended. Anything higher than 8.0.4 is fine but, if at all > possible, try to stay away from version 10. If it has to be 10, then that's > workable too. > > slau > > On Aug 22, 2012, at 12:38 AM, Naama Samantha Shang wrote: > >> Hi Slau, >> So I just want to make sure I'm clear - as soon as my work machine > arrives, do I downgrade to Lion before anything else, to avoid problems? >> Thanks, >> Naama >> >> >> -- >> Naama Samantha Shang >> Audio Technician >> Talking Book Library >> Natanya, Israel >> +972-9-861-7110 >> na...@clfb.org.il >> >> -- >> From: "Slau Halatyn" >> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 6:51 PM >> To: >> Subject: Re: Pro Tools 10 and Mountain Lion >> >>> No sarcasm at all. I just didn't want to misunderstand anything since I > currently don't use Mountain Lion. The vagaries of communication lead to > misunderstandings and I just needed to absolutely sure that at least one > person was categorically unable to read the start field with PT 10 under > Mountain Lion. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Slau >>> >>> On Aug 21, 2012, at 11:11 AM, Chris Norman wrote: >>> Haha, not sure if that was sarcasm or not, but no worries anyways. On 21/08/2012, Slau Halatyn wrote: > OK, thanks for confirming that in no uncertain terms. > > Cheers > > On Aug 20, 2012, at 10:44 PM, Chris Norman wrote: > >> OK, lemme try and lay this out as clearly and fully as I know it. >> >> I can't try pt 9 on Mountain Lion, or I would, but with PT10: >> >> In the edit window, when you interact with the counter display, >> none of the values there will read. That is to say, the start, >> current, and end selection boxes. They just say text or something like > that. >> >> As people have said, the same is true of the edit boxes in the >> tempo settings, and I'd bet it's the same in the time signature >> configuration thingy too. >> >> I'd be willing to put money on it being the text fields that Avid >> use, that require you to use the numberpad to enter data. >> >> Other than that, everything else is working healthily, hardware, >> etc, etc, etc. >> >> Cheers, and hope that clears it up a bit Slau. If you need to know >> anything else, please let me know. >> >> Cheers, >> >> On 20/08/2012, The Oreo Monster wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> You can also try going to the events menu and tempo and constant >>> tempo, you see it does the same thing there. Infact you will >>> notice it does the same in all edit fields in all of the >>> different event dialog boxes. >>> The Oreo Monster >>> monkeypushe...@gmail.com >>> >>> >>> >>> On Aug 20, 2012, at 4:01 PM, "J. R. Westmoreland" wrote: >>> Interact with the counters area and there are several there. -Original Message- From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Nick Gawronski Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 1:59 PM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Pro Tools 10 and Mountain Lion Hi, Where should I go in pro tools to see if these fields work as I am still in the process of learning pro tools? I should be able to let you know if the proper fields read if
Re: Pro Tools 10 and Mountain Lion
Hi, There was a message postted on this list about how to fix this AAX plugin thing and once it is done your RTAS plugins should show up again so 10.2 would be completely usable then as I did this when I had it installed but forget what it is currently it involves something in the avid folder there is a folder called plugins and in that folder removing the AAX folder. I also have the original 10.0 DVD and it was also talked about to uncheck avid effects in the installation not sure if this helps or not but wanted to say it worked on my system before I reinstalled mountain lion. Nick Gawronski On 8/22/2012 10:58 AM, Chris Norman wrote: Hiya, think I messed up the sending of this email, but if not, sorry for the double post. Firstly, Slau, it's no worries mate, I just wasn't sure if you were being tongue in cheek or not, but I thought I'd better lay it on a plate so there was no ambiguity. :-) J R, I am using Pro Tools 10 on my meager setup, and it works fine. The only real show stopper is that the plugins have all been converted to the AAX format, which I'm sure is lovely, but it renders the configurable parameters completely unconfigurable LOL. It is worth noting that not all plugins are in AAX, XPand for example, is still an RTAS, so it works fine, as are a few others. The isn't usually that much of a problem anyways, because there's a whole plethora of presets to choose from, but for example, with the Normalise Audio Sweet plugin, there's no presets, so I cannot normalise my stuff. Anyways, hope that's cleared up some stuff. On 22/08/2012, J. R. Westmoreland wrote: Slau, Can you briefly tell me why you have concerns about PT10? I used it a few months back for my class for recording and editing and it pretty much did as I expected. The isues I ran into were related to areas that had problems under both v9 and v10. Sorry if this is being stupid or whatever I'm just curious since I actually have the real versions of both and licenses for them as well. Thanks in advance and if it seems better go ahead and write me off list. Best, J. R. -Original Message- From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Slau Halatyn Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 7:00 AM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Pro Tools 10 and Mountain Lion Hi Naama, Absolutely, you'll need either Snow Leopard or Lion for now. Also, Pro Tools 9 would be recommended. Anything higher than 8.0.4 is fine but, if at all possible, try to stay away from version 10. If it has to be 10, then that's workable too. slau On Aug 22, 2012, at 12:38 AM, Naama Samantha Shang wrote: Hi Slau, So I just want to make sure I'm clear - as soon as my work machine arrives, do I downgrade to Lion before anything else, to avoid problems? Thanks, Naama -- Naama Samantha Shang Audio Technician Talking Book Library Natanya, Israel +972-9-861-7110 na...@clfb.org.il -- From: "Slau Halatyn" Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 6:51 PM To: Subject: Re: Pro Tools 10 and Mountain Lion No sarcasm at all. I just didn't want to misunderstand anything since I currently don't use Mountain Lion. The vagaries of communication lead to misunderstandings and I just needed to absolutely sure that at least one person was categorically unable to read the start field with PT 10 under Mountain Lion. Cheers, Slau On Aug 21, 2012, at 11:11 AM, Chris Norman wrote: Haha, not sure if that was sarcasm or not, but no worries anyways. On 21/08/2012, Slau Halatyn wrote: OK, thanks for confirming that in no uncertain terms. Cheers On Aug 20, 2012, at 10:44 PM, Chris Norman wrote: OK, lemme try and lay this out as clearly and fully as I know it. I can't try pt 9 on Mountain Lion, or I would, but with PT10: In the edit window, when you interact with the counter display, none of the values there will read. That is to say, the start, current, and end selection boxes. They just say text or something like that. As people have said, the same is true of the edit boxes in the tempo settings, and I'd bet it's the same in the time signature configuration thingy too. I'd be willing to put money on it being the text fields that Avid use, that require you to use the numberpad to enter data. Other than that, everything else is working healthily, hardware, etc, etc, etc. Cheers, and hope that clears it up a bit Slau. If you need to know anything else, please let me know. Cheers, On 20/08/2012, The Oreo Monster wrote: Hello, You can also try going to the events menu and tempo and constant tempo, you see it does the same thing there. Infact you will notice it does the same in all edit fields in all of the different event dialog boxes. The Oreo Monster monkeypushe...@gmail.com On Aug 20, 2012, at 4:01 PM, "J. R. Westmoreland" wrote: Interact with the counters area and there are several there. -Original Message- From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:
Re: Pro Tools 10 and Mountain Lion
Hi, I also have pro tools 10.1 and am running under mountain lion just fine. I am currently interested in audio editing such as voice not really music as of yet so go by mainly what i hear. My one issue with downgrading is that the newer models might not be able to be downgraded and I would also check as some systems do still have lion on them depends when it was bought so you might not have to do anything. I have found the people at my local Apple store very helpful and if you have any issues with downgrading I am sure the people at your local Apple store once you explained to them your reasons would be very helpful. Nick Gawronski On 8/22/2012 8:50 AM, J. R. Westmoreland wrote: Slau, Can you briefly tell me why you have concerns about PT10? I used it a few months back for my class for recording and editing and it pretty much did as I expected. The isues I ran into were related to areas that had problems under both v9 and v10. Sorry if this is being stupid or whatever I'm just curious since I actually have the real versions of both and licenses for them as well. Thanks in advance and if it seems better go ahead and write me off list. Best, J. R. -Original Message- From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Slau Halatyn Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 7:00 AM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Pro Tools 10 and Mountain Lion Hi Naama, Absolutely, you'll need either Snow Leopard or Lion for now. Also, Pro Tools 9 would be recommended. Anything higher than 8.0.4 is fine but, if at all possible, try to stay away from version 10. If it has to be 10, then that's workable too. slau On Aug 22, 2012, at 12:38 AM, Naama Samantha Shang wrote: Hi Slau, So I just want to make sure I'm clear - as soon as my work machine arrives, do I downgrade to Lion before anything else, to avoid problems? Thanks, Naama -- Naama Samantha Shang Audio Technician Talking Book Library Natanya, Israel +972-9-861-7110 na...@clfb.org.il -- From: "Slau Halatyn" Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 6:51 PM To: Subject: Re: Pro Tools 10 and Mountain Lion No sarcasm at all. I just didn't want to misunderstand anything since I currently don't use Mountain Lion. The vagaries of communication lead to misunderstandings and I just needed to absolutely sure that at least one person was categorically unable to read the start field with PT 10 under Mountain Lion. Cheers, Slau On Aug 21, 2012, at 11:11 AM, Chris Norman wrote: Haha, not sure if that was sarcasm or not, but no worries anyways. On 21/08/2012, Slau Halatyn wrote: OK, thanks for confirming that in no uncertain terms. Cheers On Aug 20, 2012, at 10:44 PM, Chris Norman wrote: OK, lemme try and lay this out as clearly and fully as I know it. I can't try pt 9 on Mountain Lion, or I would, but with PT10: In the edit window, when you interact with the counter display, none of the values there will read. That is to say, the start, current, and end selection boxes. They just say text or something like that. As people have said, the same is true of the edit boxes in the tempo settings, and I'd bet it's the same in the time signature configuration thingy too. I'd be willing to put money on it being the text fields that Avid use, that require you to use the numberpad to enter data. Other than that, everything else is working healthily, hardware, etc, etc, etc. Cheers, and hope that clears it up a bit Slau. If you need to know anything else, please let me know. Cheers, On 20/08/2012, The Oreo Monster wrote: Hello, You can also try going to the events menu and tempo and constant tempo, you see it does the same thing there. Infact you will notice it does the same in all edit fields in all of the different event dialog boxes. The Oreo Monster monkeypushe...@gmail.com On Aug 20, 2012, at 4:01 PM, "J. R. Westmoreland" wrote: Interact with the counters area and there are several there. -Original Message- From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Nick Gawronski Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 1:59 PM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Pro Tools 10 and Mountain Lion Hi, Where should I go in pro tools to see if these fields work as I am still in the process of learning pro tools? I should be able to let you know if the proper fields read if I am told where to go and I will also try it on my lion installation to see the difference. Nick Gawronski On 8/19/2012 6:41 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote: Nick, Can you read the Start field in the edit window under Mountain Lion in Pro Tools 10? Slau On Aug 19, 2012, at 6:57 PM, Nick Gawronski wrote: Hi, Some edit fields read fine like the file names to save projects as and when you bounce tracks to files. I am using mountain lion but do have lion still around should I need it. I think it is possible to down grade to lion if you need to but don't know if t
Re: Pro Tools 10 and Mountain Lion
Ah, so refreshing to know it's not just me that's a complete thick when it comes to the plugin parameters for that bad boy! :P On 22/08/2012, J. R. Westmoreland wrote: > I thought that was the issue but wanted to make sure. I just used the > xpand2 > and default stuff for my capstone. Buying the extras right now is just a > bit > out of reach even as a student. LOL > > > -Original Message- > From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On > Behalf > Of Chris Norman > Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 9:59 AM > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: Pro Tools 10 and Mountain Lion > > Hiya, think I messed up the sending of this email, but if not, sorry for > the > double post. > > Firstly, Slau, it's no worries mate, I just wasn't sure if you were being > tongue in cheek or not, but I thought I'd better lay it on a plate so there > was no ambiguity. :-) > > J R, I am using Pro Tools 10 on my meager setup, and it works fine. > The only real show stopper is that the plugins have all been converted to > the AAX format, which I'm sure is lovely, but it renders the configurable > parameters completely unconfigurable LOL. > > It is worth noting that not all plugins are in AAX, XPand for example, is > still an RTAS, so it works fine, as are a few others. > > The isn't usually that much of a problem anyways, because there's a whole > plethora of presets to choose from, but for example, with the Normalise > Audio Sweet plugin, there's no presets, so I cannot normalise my stuff. > > Anyways, hope that's cleared up some stuff. > > > > On 22/08/2012, J. R. Westmoreland wrote: >> Slau, >> >> Can you briefly tell me why you have concerns about PT10? I used it a >> few months back for my class for recording and editing and it pretty >> much did as I expected. >> The isues I ran into were related to areas that had problems under >> both v9 and v10. >> Sorry if this is being stupid or whatever I'm just curious since I >> actually have the real versions of both and licenses for them as well. >> Thanks in advance and if it seems better go ahead and write me off list. >> >> Best, >> J. R. >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On >> Behalf Of Slau Halatyn >> Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 7:00 AM >> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com >> Subject: Re: Pro Tools 10 and Mountain Lion >> >> Hi Naama, >> >> Absolutely, you'll need either Snow Leopard or Lion for now. Also, Pro >> Tools >> 9 would be recommended. Anything higher than 8.0.4 is fine but, if at >> all possible, try to stay away from version 10. If it has to be 10, >> then that's workable too. >> >> slau >> >> On Aug 22, 2012, at 12:38 AM, Naama Samantha Shang wrote: >> >>> Hi Slau, >>> So I just want to make sure I'm clear - as soon as my work machine >> arrives, do I downgrade to Lion before anything else, to avoid problems? >>> Thanks, >>> Naama >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Naama Samantha Shang >>> Audio Technician >>> Talking Book Library >>> Natanya, Israel >>> +972-9-861-7110 >>> na...@clfb.org.il >>> >>> -- >>> From: "Slau Halatyn" >>> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 6:51 PM >>> To: >>> Subject: Re: Pro Tools 10 and Mountain Lion >>> No sarcasm at all. I just didn't want to misunderstand anything since I >> currently don't use Mountain Lion. The vagaries of communication lead >> to misunderstandings and I just needed to absolutely sure that at >> least one person was categorically unable to read the start field with >> PT 10 under Mountain Lion. Cheers, Slau On Aug 21, 2012, at 11:11 AM, Chris Norman wrote: > Haha, not sure if that was sarcasm or not, but no worries anyways. > > > On 21/08/2012, Slau Halatyn wrote: >> OK, thanks for confirming that in no uncertain terms. >> >> Cheers >> >> On Aug 20, 2012, at 10:44 PM, Chris Norman wrote: >> >>> OK, lemme try and lay this out as clearly and fully as I know it. >>> >>> I can't try pt 9 on Mountain Lion, or I would, but with PT10: >>> >>> In the edit window, when you interact with the counter display, >>> none of the values there will read. That is to say, the start, >>> current, and end selection boxes. They just say text or something >>> like >> that. >>> >>> As people have said, the same is true of the edit boxes in the >>> tempo settings, and I'd bet it's the same in the time signature >>> configuration thingy too. >>> >>> I'd be willing to put money on it being the text fields that Avid >>> use, that require you to use the numberpad to enter data. >>> >>> Other than that, everything else is working healthily, hardware, >>> etc, etc, etc. >>> >>> Cheers, and hope that clears it up a bit Slau. If you need to >>> know anything else, please let me know. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> On 20/08/2012, The
RE: Pro Tools 10 and Mountain Lion
I thought that was the issue but wanted to make sure. I just used the xpand2 and default stuff for my capstone. Buying the extras right now is just a bit out of reach even as a student. LOL -Original Message- From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Chris Norman Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 9:59 AM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Pro Tools 10 and Mountain Lion Hiya, think I messed up the sending of this email, but if not, sorry for the double post. Firstly, Slau, it's no worries mate, I just wasn't sure if you were being tongue in cheek or not, but I thought I'd better lay it on a plate so there was no ambiguity. :-) J R, I am using Pro Tools 10 on my meager setup, and it works fine. The only real show stopper is that the plugins have all been converted to the AAX format, which I'm sure is lovely, but it renders the configurable parameters completely unconfigurable LOL. It is worth noting that not all plugins are in AAX, XPand for example, is still an RTAS, so it works fine, as are a few others. The isn't usually that much of a problem anyways, because there's a whole plethora of presets to choose from, but for example, with the Normalise Audio Sweet plugin, there's no presets, so I cannot normalise my stuff. Anyways, hope that's cleared up some stuff. On 22/08/2012, J. R. Westmoreland wrote: > Slau, > > Can you briefly tell me why you have concerns about PT10? I used it a > few months back for my class for recording and editing and it pretty > much did as I expected. > The isues I ran into were related to areas that had problems under > both v9 and v10. > Sorry if this is being stupid or whatever I'm just curious since I > actually have the real versions of both and licenses for them as well. > Thanks in advance and if it seems better go ahead and write me off list. > > Best, > J. R. > > > -Original Message- > From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On > Behalf Of Slau Halatyn > Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 7:00 AM > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: Pro Tools 10 and Mountain Lion > > Hi Naama, > > Absolutely, you'll need either Snow Leopard or Lion for now. Also, Pro > Tools > 9 would be recommended. Anything higher than 8.0.4 is fine but, if at > all possible, try to stay away from version 10. If it has to be 10, > then that's workable too. > > slau > > On Aug 22, 2012, at 12:38 AM, Naama Samantha Shang wrote: > >> Hi Slau, >> So I just want to make sure I'm clear - as soon as my work machine > arrives, do I downgrade to Lion before anything else, to avoid problems? >> Thanks, >> Naama >> >> >> -- >> Naama Samantha Shang >> Audio Technician >> Talking Book Library >> Natanya, Israel >> +972-9-861-7110 >> na...@clfb.org.il >> >> -- >> From: "Slau Halatyn" >> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 6:51 PM >> To: >> Subject: Re: Pro Tools 10 and Mountain Lion >> >>> No sarcasm at all. I just didn't want to misunderstand anything >>> since I > currently don't use Mountain Lion. The vagaries of communication lead > to misunderstandings and I just needed to absolutely sure that at > least one person was categorically unable to read the start field with > PT 10 under Mountain Lion. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Slau >>> >>> On Aug 21, 2012, at 11:11 AM, Chris Norman wrote: >>> Haha, not sure if that was sarcasm or not, but no worries anyways. On 21/08/2012, Slau Halatyn wrote: > OK, thanks for confirming that in no uncertain terms. > > Cheers > > On Aug 20, 2012, at 10:44 PM, Chris Norman wrote: > >> OK, lemme try and lay this out as clearly and fully as I know it. >> >> I can't try pt 9 on Mountain Lion, or I would, but with PT10: >> >> In the edit window, when you interact with the counter display, >> none of the values there will read. That is to say, the start, >> current, and end selection boxes. They just say text or something >> like > that. >> >> As people have said, the same is true of the edit boxes in the >> tempo settings, and I'd bet it's the same in the time signature >> configuration thingy too. >> >> I'd be willing to put money on it being the text fields that Avid >> use, that require you to use the numberpad to enter data. >> >> Other than that, everything else is working healthily, hardware, >> etc, etc, etc. >> >> Cheers, and hope that clears it up a bit Slau. If you need to >> know anything else, please let me know. >> >> Cheers, >> >> On 20/08/2012, The Oreo Monster wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> You can also try going to the events menu and tempo and >>> constant tempo, you see it does the same thing there. Infact you >>> will notice it does the same in all edit fields in all of the >>> different event dialog boxes. >>> The Oreo Monster
Re: Pro Tools 10 and Mountain Lion
Hiya, think I messed up the sending of this email, but if not, sorry for the double post. Firstly, Slau, it's no worries mate, I just wasn't sure if you were being tongue in cheek or not, but I thought I'd better lay it on a plate so there was no ambiguity. :-) J R, I am using Pro Tools 10 on my meager setup, and it works fine. The only real show stopper is that the plugins have all been converted to the AAX format, which I'm sure is lovely, but it renders the configurable parameters completely unconfigurable LOL. It is worth noting that not all plugins are in AAX, XPand for example, is still an RTAS, so it works fine, as are a few others. The isn't usually that much of a problem anyways, because there's a whole plethora of presets to choose from, but for example, with the Normalise Audio Sweet plugin, there's no presets, so I cannot normalise my stuff. Anyways, hope that's cleared up some stuff. On 22/08/2012, J. R. Westmoreland wrote: > Slau, > > Can you briefly tell me why you have concerns about PT10? I used it a few > months back for my class for recording and editing and it pretty much did > as > I expected. > The isues I ran into were related to areas that had problems under both v9 > and v10. > Sorry if this is being stupid or whatever I'm just curious since I actually > have the real versions of both and licenses for them as well. > Thanks in advance and if it seems better go ahead and write me off list. > > Best, > J. R. > > > -Original Message- > From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On > Behalf > Of Slau Halatyn > Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 7:00 AM > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: Pro Tools 10 and Mountain Lion > > Hi Naama, > > Absolutely, you'll need either Snow Leopard or Lion for now. Also, Pro > Tools > 9 would be recommended. Anything higher than 8.0.4 is fine but, if at all > possible, try to stay away from version 10. If it has to be 10, then that's > workable too. > > slau > > On Aug 22, 2012, at 12:38 AM, Naama Samantha Shang wrote: > >> Hi Slau, >> So I just want to make sure I'm clear - as soon as my work machine > arrives, do I downgrade to Lion before anything else, to avoid problems? >> Thanks, >> Naama >> >> >> -- >> Naama Samantha Shang >> Audio Technician >> Talking Book Library >> Natanya, Israel >> +972-9-861-7110 >> na...@clfb.org.il >> >> -- >> From: "Slau Halatyn" >> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 6:51 PM >> To: >> Subject: Re: Pro Tools 10 and Mountain Lion >> >>> No sarcasm at all. I just didn't want to misunderstand anything since I > currently don't use Mountain Lion. The vagaries of communication lead to > misunderstandings and I just needed to absolutely sure that at least one > person was categorically unable to read the start field with PT 10 under > Mountain Lion. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Slau >>> >>> On Aug 21, 2012, at 11:11 AM, Chris Norman wrote: >>> Haha, not sure if that was sarcasm or not, but no worries anyways. On 21/08/2012, Slau Halatyn wrote: > OK, thanks for confirming that in no uncertain terms. > > Cheers > > On Aug 20, 2012, at 10:44 PM, Chris Norman wrote: > >> OK, lemme try and lay this out as clearly and fully as I know it. >> >> I can't try pt 9 on Mountain Lion, or I would, but with PT10: >> >> In the edit window, when you interact with the counter display, >> none of the values there will read. That is to say, the start, >> current, and end selection boxes. They just say text or something >> like > that. >> >> As people have said, the same is true of the edit boxes in the >> tempo settings, and I'd bet it's the same in the time signature >> configuration thingy too. >> >> I'd be willing to put money on it being the text fields that Avid >> use, that require you to use the numberpad to enter data. >> >> Other than that, everything else is working healthily, hardware, >> etc, etc, etc. >> >> Cheers, and hope that clears it up a bit Slau. If you need to know >> anything else, please let me know. >> >> Cheers, >> >> On 20/08/2012, The Oreo Monster wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> You can also try going to the events menu and tempo and constant >>> tempo, you see it does the same thing there. Infact you will >>> notice it does the same in all edit fields in all of the >>> different event dialog boxes. >>> The Oreo Monster >>> monkeypushe...@gmail.com >>> >>> >>> >>> On Aug 20, 2012, at 4:01 PM, "J. R. Westmoreland" >>> wrote: >>> Interact with the counters area and there are several there. -Original Message- From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Nick Gawronski Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 1:59 PM To: ptaccess@googlegrou
Re: Question about Pianoteq
Presets for what? Ivery, or for Pianoteq. Chris. - Original Message - From: "Kevin Reeves" To: Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 10:41 AM Subject: Re: Question about Pianoteq Gordon Kent actually created all the presets using windows and saved them out and imported them back into the mac. Windows pro tools was accessible enough to do at least that much. Kevin=
Re: Question about Pianoteq
Kevin, can you make a recording of you playing just piano by itself, no other instruments, just improv maybe about 10 or so bars using the logic piano samples so I can hear isolated, how they sound? Chris. - Original Message - From: "Kevin Reeves" To: Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 10:39 AM Subject: Re: Question about Pianoteq I use it as a midi module. I can import midi files into it, select a patch, then bounce that track out and reimport back into Pro Tools. It's convoluted, but it works. Kevin On Aug 22, 2012, at 9:10 AM, Christopher-Mark gilland wrote: o, k? I didn't think that logic was accessible though. Chris. - Original Message - From: "Kevin Reeves" To: Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 8:22 AM Subject: Re: Question about Pianoteq I preferred to use the pianos in logic. On Aug 22, 2012, at 5:44 AM, Scott Chesworth wrote: Hey Kevin, Did you not dig it enough to purchase after the demo, or do you already have a plugin you prefer? Just curiosity really. Cheers Scott On 8/22/12, Kevin Reeves wrote: Piano tech worked fine for me on Pro TOols. I could see all of the parameters no problem. Not sure about any key strokes, as I didn't use the stand alone version. I just tried the 3 day demo. Kevin
Re: Question about Pianoteq
Gordon Kent actually created all the presets using windows and saved them out and imported them back into the mac. Windows pro tools was accessible enough to do at least that much. Kevin
Re: Question about Pianoteq
I use it as a midi module. I can import midi files into it, select a patch, then bounce that track out and reimport back into Pro Tools. It's convoluted, but it works. Kevin On Aug 22, 2012, at 9:10 AM, Christopher-Mark gilland wrote: > o, k? I didn't think that logic was accessible though. > > Chris. > > - Original Message - From: "Kevin Reeves" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 8:22 AM > Subject: Re: Question about Pianoteq > > >> I preferred to use the pianos in logic. >> On Aug 22, 2012, at 5:44 AM, Scott Chesworth wrote: >> >>> Hey Kevin, >>> >>> Did you not dig it enough to purchase after the demo, or do you >>> already have a plugin you prefer? Just curiosity really. >>> >>> Cheers >>> Scott >>> >>> On 8/22/12, Kevin Reeves wrote: Piano tech worked fine for me on Pro TOols. I could see all of the parameters no problem. Not sure about any key strokes, as I didn't use the stand alone version. I just tried the 3 day demo. Kevin >
RE: Pro Tools 10 and Mountain Lion
Slau, Can you briefly tell me why you have concerns about PT10? I used it a few months back for my class for recording and editing and it pretty much did as I expected. The isues I ran into were related to areas that had problems under both v9 and v10. Sorry if this is being stupid or whatever I'm just curious since I actually have the real versions of both and licenses for them as well. Thanks in advance and if it seems better go ahead and write me off list. Best, J. R. -Original Message- From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Slau Halatyn Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 7:00 AM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Pro Tools 10 and Mountain Lion Hi Naama, Absolutely, you'll need either Snow Leopard or Lion for now. Also, Pro Tools 9 would be recommended. Anything higher than 8.0.4 is fine but, if at all possible, try to stay away from version 10. If it has to be 10, then that's workable too. slau On Aug 22, 2012, at 12:38 AM, Naama Samantha Shang wrote: > Hi Slau, > So I just want to make sure I'm clear - as soon as my work machine arrives, do I downgrade to Lion before anything else, to avoid problems? > Thanks, > Naama > > > -- > Naama Samantha Shang > Audio Technician > Talking Book Library > Natanya, Israel > +972-9-861-7110 > na...@clfb.org.il > > -- > From: "Slau Halatyn" > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 6:51 PM > To: > Subject: Re: Pro Tools 10 and Mountain Lion > >> No sarcasm at all. I just didn't want to misunderstand anything since I currently don't use Mountain Lion. The vagaries of communication lead to misunderstandings and I just needed to absolutely sure that at least one person was categorically unable to read the start field with PT 10 under Mountain Lion. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Slau >> >> On Aug 21, 2012, at 11:11 AM, Chris Norman wrote: >> >>> Haha, not sure if that was sarcasm or not, but no worries anyways. >>> >>> >>> On 21/08/2012, Slau Halatyn wrote: OK, thanks for confirming that in no uncertain terms. Cheers On Aug 20, 2012, at 10:44 PM, Chris Norman wrote: > OK, lemme try and lay this out as clearly and fully as I know it. > > I can't try pt 9 on Mountain Lion, or I would, but with PT10: > > In the edit window, when you interact with the counter display, > none of the values there will read. That is to say, the start, > current, and end selection boxes. They just say text or something like that. > > As people have said, the same is true of the edit boxes in the > tempo settings, and I'd bet it's the same in the time signature > configuration thingy too. > > I'd be willing to put money on it being the text fields that Avid > use, that require you to use the numberpad to enter data. > > Other than that, everything else is working healthily, hardware, > etc, etc, etc. > > Cheers, and hope that clears it up a bit Slau. If you need to know > anything else, please let me know. > > Cheers, > > On 20/08/2012, The Oreo Monster wrote: >> Hello, >> >> You can also try going to the events menu and tempo and constant >> tempo, you see it does the same thing there. Infact you will >> notice it does the same in all edit fields in all of the >> different event dialog boxes. >> The Oreo Monster >> monkeypushe...@gmail.com >> >> >> >> On Aug 20, 2012, at 4:01 PM, "J. R. Westmoreland" wrote: >> >>> Interact with the counters area and there are several there. >>> >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com >>> [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Nick Gawronski >>> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 1:59 PM >>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com >>> Subject: Re: Pro Tools 10 and Mountain Lion >>> >>> Hi, Where should I go in pro tools to see if these fields work >>> as I am still in the process of learning pro tools? I should be >>> able to let you know if the proper fields read if I am told >>> where to go and I will also try it on my lion installation to >>> see the difference. Nick Gawronski >>> >>> On 8/19/2012 6:41 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote: Nick, Can you read the Start field in the edit window under Mountain Lion in Pro >>> Tools 10? Slau On Aug 19, 2012, at 6:57 PM, Nick Gawronski wrote: > Hi, Some edit fields read fine like the file names to save > projects as and when you bounce tracks to files. I am using > mountain lion but do have lion still around should I need it. > I think it is possible to down grade to lion if you need to > but don't know if the newer mac books will support the down > grade. My digi 003 works fi
Re: Question about Pianoteq
Jim, You say you have Ivery? How are you using that, as if you can convince me that it works with Protools, I'll buy it. I just have been told by so many peole that you can't get the presets to work in PT, and you can't just pop it on an insert, like you can with Pianoteq and then just say to hell with it, and expect it to work right out of the box. I hear you won't get any sound at all period just by loading it up. I hear you literally have... *have!* to select some sort of a preset to make it work. Chris. - Original Message - From: "Jim Noseworthy" To: Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 8:30 AM Subject: RE: Question about Pianoteq Scott: I have Pianoteq as well as other pianos such as Ivory, True Pianos, and those that shipp with Apple's MainStage. In my opinion, if you are looking for a piano sound, Pianoteq would not be the way to go. If, however, you are looking for a highly configurable instrument, Pianoteq might be a good choice. If you are wanting to purchase Pianoteq, I can probably give you a good deal since I never use the piano. Cheers. -Original Message- From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Reeves Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 9:23 AM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Question about Pianoteq I preferred to use the pianos in logic. On Aug 22, 2012, at 5:44 AM, Scott Chesworth wrote: Hey Kevin, Did you not dig it enough to purchase after the demo, or do you already have a plugin you prefer? Just curiosity really. Cheers Scott On 8/22/12, Kevin Reeves wrote: Piano tech worked fine for me on Pro TOols. I could see all of the parameters no problem. Not sure about any key strokes, as I didn't use the stand alone version. I just tried the 3 day demo. Kevin
Re: Question about Pianoteq
o, k? I didn't think that logic was accessible though. Chris. - Original Message - From: "Kevin Reeves" To: Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 8:22 AM Subject: Re: Question about Pianoteq I preferred to use the pianos in logic. On Aug 22, 2012, at 5:44 AM, Scott Chesworth wrote: Hey Kevin, Did you not dig it enough to purchase after the demo, or do you already have a plugin you prefer? Just curiosity really. Cheers Scott On 8/22/12, Kevin Reeves wrote: Piano tech worked fine for me on Pro TOols. I could see all of the parameters no problem. Not sure about any key strokes, as I didn't use the stand alone version. I just tried the 3 day demo. Kevin
Re: Question about Pianoteq
Very good to know. Thanks for the heads up. Chris. - Original Message - From: "Kevin Reeves" To: Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 12:59 AM Subject: Re: Question about Pianoteq Piano tech worked fine for me on Pro TOols. I could see all of the parameters no problem. Not sure about any key strokes, as I didn't use the stand alone version. I just tried the 3 day demo. Kevin=
Re: Question about Pianoteq
Cheers for the advice chaps. I'm a makeshift keys player at best, so it's not something that'd get a lot of use. Just looking for something that I could fire up and would sound decent in the mix without too much hassle really, so perhaps Pianoteq isn't the way to go here. Scott On 8/22/12, Jim Noseworthy wrote: > Scott: > > I have Pianoteq as well as other pianos such as Ivory, True Pianos, and > those that shipp with Apple's MainStage. In my opinion, if you are looking > for a piano sound, Pianoteq would not be the way to go. If, however, you > are looking for a highly configurable instrument, Pianoteq might be a good > choice. > > If you are wanting to purchase Pianoteq, I can probably give you a good > deal > since I never use the piano. > > Cheers. > > > > -Original Message- > From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On > Behalf > Of Kevin Reeves > Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 9:23 AM > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: Question about Pianoteq > > I preferred to use the pianos in logic. > On Aug 22, 2012, at 5:44 AM, Scott Chesworth wrote: > >> Hey Kevin, >> >> Did you not dig it enough to purchase after the demo, or do you >> already have a plugin you prefer? Just curiosity really. >> >> Cheers >> Scott >> >> On 8/22/12, Kevin Reeves wrote: >>> Piano tech worked fine for me on Pro TOols. I could see all of the >>> parameters no problem. Not sure about any key strokes, as I didn't >>> use the stand alone version. I just tried the 3 day demo. >>> >>> Kevin > >
Re: Pro Tools 10 and Mountain Lion
Hi Naama, Absolutely, you'll need either Snow Leopard or Lion for now. Also, Pro Tools 9 would be recommended. Anything higher than 8.0.4 is fine but, if at all possible, try to stay away from version 10. If it has to be 10, then that's workable too. slau On Aug 22, 2012, at 12:38 AM, Naama Samantha Shang wrote: > Hi Slau, > So I just want to make sure I'm clear - as soon as my work machine arrives, > do I downgrade to Lion before anything else, to avoid problems? > Thanks, > Naama > > > -- > Naama Samantha Shang > Audio Technician > Talking Book Library > Natanya, Israel > +972-9-861-7110 > na...@clfb.org.il > > -- > From: "Slau Halatyn" > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 6:51 PM > To: > Subject: Re: Pro Tools 10 and Mountain Lion > >> No sarcasm at all. I just didn't want to misunderstand anything since I >> currently don't use Mountain Lion. The vagaries of communication lead to >> misunderstandings and I just needed to absolutely sure that at least one >> person was categorically unable to read the start field with PT 10 under >> Mountain Lion. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Slau >> >> On Aug 21, 2012, at 11:11 AM, Chris Norman wrote: >> >>> Haha, not sure if that was sarcasm or not, but no worries anyways. >>> >>> >>> On 21/08/2012, Slau Halatyn wrote: OK, thanks for confirming that in no uncertain terms. Cheers On Aug 20, 2012, at 10:44 PM, Chris Norman wrote: > OK, lemme try and lay this out as clearly and fully as I know it. > > I can't try pt 9 on Mountain Lion, or I would, but with PT10: > > In the edit window, when you interact with the counter display, none > of the values there will read. That is to say, the start, current, and > end selection boxes. They just say text or something like that. > > As people have said, the same is true of the edit boxes in the tempo > settings, and I'd bet it's the same in the time signature > configuration thingy too. > > I'd be willing to put money on it being the text fields that Avid use, > that require you to use the numberpad to enter data. > > Other than that, everything else is working healthily, hardware, etc, etc, > etc. > > Cheers, and hope that clears it up a bit Slau. If you need to know > anything else, please let me know. > > Cheers, > > On 20/08/2012, The Oreo Monster wrote: >> Hello, >> >> You can also try going to the events menu and tempo and constant tempo, >> you >> see it does the same thing there. Infact you will notice it does the same >> in >> all edit fields in all of the different event dialog boxes. >> The Oreo Monster >> monkeypushe...@gmail.com >> >> >> >> On Aug 20, 2012, at 4:01 PM, "J. R. Westmoreland" wrote: >> >>> Interact with the counters area and there are several there. >>> >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On >>> Behalf >>> Of Nick Gawronski >>> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 1:59 PM >>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com >>> Subject: Re: Pro Tools 10 and Mountain Lion >>> >>> Hi, Where should I go in pro tools to see if these fields work as I am >>> still >>> in the process of learning pro tools? I should be able to let you know >>> if >>> the proper fields read if I am told where to go and I will also try it >>> on >>> my >>> lion installation to see the difference. Nick Gawronski >>> >>> On 8/19/2012 6:41 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote: Nick, Can you read the Start field in the edit window under Mountain Lion in Pro >>> Tools 10? Slau On Aug 19, 2012, at 6:57 PM, Nick Gawronski wrote: > Hi, Some edit fields read fine like the file names to save projects > as and when you bounce tracks to files. I am using mountain lion but > do have lion still around should I need it. I think it is possible > to down grade to lion if you need to but don't know if the newer mac > books will support the down grade. My digi 003 works fine under > mountain lion and I did not need to reinstall anything. The only > thing I had to reinstall was the drivers for my express card for my > sata drive and that was not even an upgrade I just opened the folder > where I had the pkg file and ran it and things now work great again. > Nick Gawronski > > On 8/18/2012 10:15 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote: >> So, am I understanding this correctly? With Mountain Lion, no edit >>> fields are being read in Pro Tools versions 9 and 10? Can someone else >>> confirm this? Version 10 reads fine with Snow Leopard and Lion, from >>> other >>> accounts. >>
Re: Question about Pianoteq
I have never been really happy with Pianoteq until Pianoteq 4. If you haven't listened to version 4, please do and I think you'll be surprised. They have made tremendous improvements in the sound specially in the attack Bart which was really the week spot as far as I'm concerned. Best, JPR http://www.facebook.com/jprykiel http://myspace.com/jeanphilipperykiel - Original Message - From: Jim Noseworthy To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 2:30 PM Subject: RE: Question about Pianoteq Scott: I have Pianoteq as well as other pianos such as Ivory, True Pianos, and those that shipp with Apple's MainStage. In my opinion, if you are looking for a piano sound, Pianoteq would not be the way to go. If, however, you are looking for a highly configurable instrument, Pianoteq might be a good choice. If you are wanting to purchase Pianoteq, I can probably give you a good deal since I never use the piano. Cheers. -Original Message- From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Reeves Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 9:23 AM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Question about Pianoteq I preferred to use the pianos in logic. On Aug 22, 2012, at 5:44 AM, Scott Chesworth wrote: > Hey Kevin, > > Did you not dig it enough to purchase after the demo, or do you > already have a plugin you prefer? Just curiosity really. > > Cheers > Scott > > On 8/22/12, Kevin Reeves wrote: >> Piano tech worked fine for me on Pro TOols. I could see all of the >> parameters no problem. Not sure about any key strokes, as I didn't >> use the stand alone version. I just tried the 3 day demo. >> >> Kevin
RE: Question about Pianoteq
Scott: I have Pianoteq as well as other pianos such as Ivory, True Pianos, and those that shipp with Apple's MainStage. In my opinion, if you are looking for a piano sound, Pianoteq would not be the way to go. If, however, you are looking for a highly configurable instrument, Pianoteq might be a good choice. If you are wanting to purchase Pianoteq, I can probably give you a good deal since I never use the piano. Cheers. -Original Message- From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Reeves Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 9:23 AM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Question about Pianoteq I preferred to use the pianos in logic. On Aug 22, 2012, at 5:44 AM, Scott Chesworth wrote: > Hey Kevin, > > Did you not dig it enough to purchase after the demo, or do you > already have a plugin you prefer? Just curiosity really. > > Cheers > Scott > > On 8/22/12, Kevin Reeves wrote: >> Piano tech worked fine for me on Pro TOols. I could see all of the >> parameters no problem. Not sure about any key strokes, as I didn't >> use the stand alone version. I just tried the 3 day demo. >> >> Kevin
Re: Question about Pianoteq
I preferred to use the pianos in logic. On Aug 22, 2012, at 5:44 AM, Scott Chesworth wrote: > Hey Kevin, > > Did you not dig it enough to purchase after the demo, or do you > already have a plugin you prefer? Just curiosity really. > > Cheers > Scott > > On 8/22/12, Kevin Reeves wrote: >> Piano tech worked fine for me on Pro TOols. I could see all of the >> parameters no problem. Not sure about any key strokes, as I didn't use the >> stand alone version. I just tried the 3 day demo. >> >> Kevin
Re: Reading counters
Thanks Stefan
Re: Question about Pianoteq
Hey Kevin, Did you not dig it enough to purchase after the demo, or do you already have a plugin you prefer? Just curiosity really. Cheers Scott On 8/22/12, Kevin Reeves wrote: > Piano tech worked fine for me on Pro TOols. I could see all of the > parameters no problem. Not sure about any key strokes, as I didn't use the > stand alone version. I just tried the 3 day demo. > > Kevin
