Re: Example of band in a box with ProTools

[Vaughn Brown]

Sweet!

On 5/25/16, Christopher-Mark Gilland  wrote:
> Guys, here is an example I did pretty much strictly in BIAB to give you an
> idea what this software is cabable of doing.
>
> Firstly, let me say that all of the samples in this file were from BIAB.
> there is not a single live instrument in the whole thing.  Every single
> instrument was from the Real track soundbank library that comes with the
> program.  If you get the ultimate version, which is what I own, then the
> entire sample library is literally speaking just over 80 gigs in size.
> You'll know why when you hear this.  Trust me!
>
> All I did with ProTools on this was to import the raw wave stem tracks which
> were generated by BIAB, run some leveling, E queueing, and a teeny, and I do
> mean a teeny! bit of compression.  Everything else was totally BIAB.
>
> I'm sorry, but Music Memos for iOS was totally, after playing with this for
> about 45 minutes quite thoroughly not even remotely able to come close to
> this type production.
>
> Anyway, for what it's worth, here you all go.  I did a song you all should
> be fairly familiar with.  That way, you all would know what exactly to be
> expecting.
>
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/16962268/01%20-%20Music%20Box%20Dancer%20final%20draft.wav
>
> Chris.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>


-- 
Vaughn Brown
Berklee College of Music Graduate, Bachelor in Music, Drummer, educator
504-202-8492
http://www.vaughnbrown.net

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Here's one more example

[Vaughn Brown]

Very neat!

On 5/25/16, Christopher-Mark Gilland  wrote:
> Here is one more example I through together about a week ago.  Hope you like
> it.
>
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/16962268/Christopher%20Gilland%20-%20Mockingbird%20Hill.mp3
>
> Chris.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>


-- 
Vaughn Brown
Berklee College of Music Graduate, Bachelor in Music, Drummer, educator
504-202-8492
http://www.vaughnbrown.net

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Here's one more example

[Christopher-Mark Gilland]

Here is one more example I through together about a week ago.  Hope you like it.

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/16962268/Christopher%20Gilland%20-%20Mockingbird%20Hill.mp3

Chris.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Example of band in a box with ProTools

[Christopher-Mark Gilland]

Guys, here is an example I did pretty much strictly in BIAB to give you an idea 
what this software is cabable of doing.

Firstly, let me say that all of the samples in this file were from BIAB.  there 
is not a single live instrument in the whole thing.  Every single instrument 
was from the Real track soundbank library that comes with the program.  If you 
get the ultimate version, which is what I own, then the entire sample library 
is literally speaking just over 80 gigs in size.  You'll know why when you hear 
this.  Trust me!

All I did with ProTools on this was to import the raw wave stem tracks which 
were generated by BIAB, run some leveling, E queueing, and a teeny, and I do 
mean a teeny! bit of compression.  Everything else was totally BIAB.

I'm sorry, but Music Memos for iOS was totally, after playing with this for 
about 45 minutes quite thoroughly not even remotely able to come close to this 
type production.

Anyway, for what it's worth, here you all go.  I did a song you all should be 
fairly familiar with.  That way, you all would know what exactly to be 
expecting.

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/16962268/01%20-%20Music%20Box%20Dancer%20final%20draft.wav

Chris.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Band in a box in combination with ProTools?

[Christopher-Mark Gilland]

Just tried it.  Absolutely not!  I very very much appreciate the attempted 
help.  NO, really, seriously, I do, but this doesn't even  come close! not 
even remotely, to what BIAB can do.

---
Christopher Gilland
JAWS Certified, 2016.
Training Instructor.

clgillan...@gmail.com
Phone: (704) 256-8010.
- Original Message - 
From: "TheOreoMonster" 

To: 
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 12:14 PM
Subject: Re: Band in a box in combination with ProTools?


The iOS music Memos app from apple seems to do a lot of similar things to 
Band in a Box. Try that and see if its sufficient for you. Thanks to the 
magic of iCloud it should sync to your mac and be available in Logic/GB when 
you are done so you can bounce the wavs out there and import into pro tools 
as well.


On May 25, 2016, at 8:11 AM, Christopher-Mark Gilland 
 wrote:


Not to get too off topic, but what I! wanna know, is, has anyone tried 
PG-Music's Band in a Box on the Mac?  I use it quite regularly on the 
Windows side to help with arranging my music, then I take those projects 
over to PT, import the raw wave stem files, and then add whatever else I 
need.  It's bad enough that I have to use JAWS scripts on Windows to get 
the thing to work.  The program is over $500, which right now I can't 
afford. No trial either for the Windows version, or the mac version.  I'd 
buy the thing, but there is no refund policy, and when I called and 
explained my situation, they were quite rude, and very unwilling to work 
with me.  I love their product, but their customer service absolutely 
stinks, and believe me, though respectfully, I let them know it!


I just can't afford gambling $500 or more on something that won't work. 
No music store in my area has a demo system set up on the mac with it 
installed either.  Otherwise, I'd just set up a time to go in and try it.


Honestly, BIAB is so mission critical to my work, that it's really the 
only reason I've not totally done away with Windows.  If it wasn't for 
that one app, and I do mean, literally! just! that one? app, I'd go 
macintosh all the way, hands down, no questions asked.


Any thoughts?

Chris.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools 
Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Band in a box in combination with ProTools?

[TheOreoMonster]

The iOS music Memos app from apple seems to do a lot of similar things to Band 
in a Box. Try that and see if its sufficient for you. Thanks to the magic of 
iCloud it should sync to your mac and be available in Logic/GB when you are 
done so you can bounce the wavs out there and import into pro tools as well. 

> On May 25, 2016, at 8:11 AM, Christopher-Mark Gilland  
> wrote:
> 
> Not to get too off topic, but what I! wanna know, is, has anyone tried 
> PG-Music's Band in a Box on the Mac?  I use it quite regularly on the Windows 
> side to help with arranging my music, then I take those projects over to PT, 
> import the raw wave stem files, and then add whatever else I need.  It's bad 
> enough that I have to use JAWS scripts on Windows to get the thing to work.  
> The program is over $500, which right now I can't afford. No trial either for 
> the Windows version, or the mac version.  I'd buy the thing, but there is no 
> refund policy, and when I called and explained my situation, they were quite 
> rude, and very unwilling to work with me.  I love their product, but their 
> customer service absolutely stinks, and believe me, though respectfully, I 
> let them know it!
> 
> I just can't afford gambling $500 or more on something that won't work.  No 
> music store in my area has a demo system set up on the mac with it installed 
> either.  Otherwise, I'd just set up a time to go in and try it.
> 
> Honestly, BIAB is so mission critical to my work, that it's really the only 
> reason I've not totally done away with Windows.  If it wasn't for that one 
> app, and I do mean, literally! just! that one? app, I'd go macintosh all the 
> way, hands down, no questions asked.
> 
> Any thoughts?
> 
> Chris. 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Round-Call: Software-Instruments for PT

[Chris Smart]

you know, this might be worth getting a used Mac Mini for, just to 
run that MIDI rig.


At 08:00 AM 5/25/2016, you wrote:
Providing you use one of their Contact S series keyboards with 
Contact then yes it will be accessible in later release.
> On May 25, 2016, at 7:50 AM, Christopher-Mark Gilland 
 wrote:

>
> Wo! I haven't been following this thread, so forgive me.  Did I 
hear that Native Instruments is now accessible with ProTools?

> ---
> Christopher Gilland
> JAWS Certified, 2016.
> Training Instructor.
>
> clgillan...@gmail.com
> Phone: (704) 256-8010.
> - Original Message - From: "Kevin Reeves" 
> To: 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 7:08 AM
> Subject: Re: Round-Call: Software-Instruments for PT
>
>
> I have heard the native instruments demo, and it will be ProTools 
compatible. The self voicing part of this uses the Apple system 
voice, so it can run standalone or in any plug and host. Really 
excited for this new turn of events, and the minute that this 
access  is built into the next version of complete, I will be 
ordering complete ultimate with the 61 note controller. The built 
in sounds that come with ProTools suck royally, structure has 
proven itself to be less than desirable, so I am ready for some 
really great sounds for ProTools. This type of access couldn't come 
soon enough.

>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On May 24, 2016, at 2:58 PM, Slau Halatyn  wrote:
>>
>> Hi Joy,
>>
>> I'd imagine it's the same kind of deal with the OmniSphere 
stuff. The trouble, of course, is that, like Native Instruments' 
stuff, we're talking about thousands of sounds so saving out 
presets to TFX format is virtually inconceivable.

>>
>> Yes, Rogue Amoeba did put out LoopBack a little while ago and I 
purchased it but haven't tried it yet.

>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Slau
>>
>>> On May 24, 2016, at 12:30 PM, 'Joy Bausch' via Pro Tools 
Accessibility  wrote:

>>>
>>> Hi Slau,
>>> thanks so much for your reply. As for your suggestion 
concerning SoundFlower, I checked it out, and it looks like it is 
currently not supported. However, Rogue Amoeba, who apparently were 
the last distributors, now have an add-on available called 
LoopBack, which does the same thing. I'll definitely give that a 
go, knowing that this Company has some other great products out, 
like Audio Hijack.

>>> Thanks for pointing me that way.
>>> As for virtual instruments, I haven't taken the plunge into 
buying any, mostly because I couldn't find reliable info on what works.
>>> All I know is what we all know: Native Instruments is a no-no. 
But what about Omnisphere or Nexus or something down that road? I'm 
mainly after hig-quality bread-and-butter-sounds, plus orchestral. 
Of course some electronic/synth sounds are always welcome1but since 
I'm a bit of an analogue nerd i would make my own...:)
>>> So any advice on that? I am thinking about giving the NI 
Komplete Kontrol keyboard a try, but if I could find something 
similar and less costly that would be great.

>>>
>>> Kindest regards, and again thanks.
>>>
>>> Joy
>>>
>>> Von meinem iPhone gesendet
>>>
 Am 24.05.2016 um 17:39 schrieb Slau Halatyn :

 Hi Joy,

 Pretty much anything that has automation parameters is going 
to be accessible. The only aspect of virtual plug-ins that is 
generally not accessible is the presets. Once the presets are 
accessed and saved as .tfx files, they can be shared. Incidentally, 
the Logic sounds can be accessed from within Pro Tools by using 
Soundflower. There are videos and tutorials online on how to do 
this dating back to Pro Tools version 11. I did it back then and it 
does work. I haven't done it in a while but it's certainly 
possible. You might want to look into that. Aside from Logic's 
stock sounds, which third party virtual instruments have you used in Logic?


 Slau

> On May 24, 2016, at 1:14 AM, 'Joy Bausch' via Pro Tools 
Accessibility  wrote:

>
> Cheers guys,
> subject already states what I'm curious about: what software 
instruments (synths, samplers, drum machinees etc.) are you using, 
what is VoiceOver-friendly and so on.
> Coming from Logic Pro myself i have to say PTs selection 
leaves a lot to be disered, although that is a personal taste matter too.

> Anyways, would appreciate any input on this.
> Thanks!
> Joy
>
>
>
> Von meinem iPhone gesendet
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from 
it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
Google Groups "Pro Tools 

Re: Round-Call: Software-Instruments for PT

[Chris Smart]

The person who recorded the demo has asked that it not be shared 
publically yet. Please respect this.
Of course, what people say or do in private emails to each other is 
entirely their business.



At 07:12 AM 5/25/2016, you wrote:

Kevin,

Can you share the link to the demo?

Sean


On 5/25/16, Kevin Reeves  wrote:
> I have heard the native instruments demo, and it will be ProTools
> compatible. The self voicing part of this uses the Apple system 
voice, so it
> can run standalone or in any plug and host. Really excited for 
this new turn

> of events, and the minute that this access  is built into the next version
> of complete, I will be ordering complete ultimate with the 61 note
> controller. The built in sounds that come with ProTools suck royally,
> structure has proven itself to be less than desirable, so I am ready for
> some really great sounds for ProTools. This type of access couldn't come
> soon enough.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On May 24, 2016, at 2:58 PM, Slau Halatyn  wrote:
>>
>> Hi Joy,
>>
>> I'd imagine it's the same kind of deal with the OmniSphere stuff. The
>> trouble, of course, is that, like Native Instruments' stuff, we're talking
>> about thousands of sounds so saving out presets to TFX format is virtually
>> inconceivable.
>>
>> Yes, Rogue Amoeba did put out LoopBack a little while ago and I purchased
>> it but haven't tried it yet.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Slau
>>
>>> On May 24, 2016, at 12:30 PM, 'Joy Bausch' via Pro Tools Accessibility
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Slau,
>>> thanks so much for your reply. As for your suggestion concerning
>>> SoundFlower, I checked it out, and it looks like it is currently not
>>> supported. However, Rogue Amoeba, who apparently were the last
>>> distributors, now have an add-on available called LoopBack, which does
>>> the same thing. I'll definitely give that a go, knowing that this Company
>>> has some other great products out, like Audio Hijack.
>>> Thanks for pointing me that way.
>>> As for virtual instruments, I haven't taken the plunge into buying any,
>>> mostly because I couldn't find reliable info on what works.
>>> All I know is what we all know: Native Instruments is a no-no. But what
>>> about Omnisphere or Nexus or something down that road? I'm mainly after
>>> hig-quality bread-and-butter-sounds, plus orchestral. Of course some
>>> electronic/synth sounds are always welcome1but since I'm a bit of an
>>> analogue nerd i would make my own...:)
>>> So any advice on that? I am thinking about giving the NI Komplete Kontrol
>>> keyboard a try, but if I could find something similar and less costly
>>> that would be great.
>>>
>>> Kindest regards, and again thanks.
>>>
>>> Joy
>>>
>>> Von meinem iPhone gesendet
>>>
 Am 24.05.2016 um 17:39 schrieb Slau Halatyn :

 Hi Joy,

 Pretty much anything that has automation parameters is going to be
 accessible. The only aspect of virtual plug-ins that is generally not
 accessible is the presets. Once the presets are accessed and saved as
 .tfx files, they can be shared. Incidentally, the Logic sounds can be
 accessed from within Pro Tools by using Soundflower. There are videos
 and tutorials online on how to do this dating back to Pro Tools version
 11. I did it back then and it does work. I haven't done it in a while
 but it's certainly possible. You might want to look into that. Aside
 from Logic's stock sounds, which third party virtual instruments have
 you used in Logic?

 Slau

> On May 24, 2016, at 1:14 AM, 'Joy Bausch' via Pro Tools Accessibility
>  wrote:
>
> Cheers guys,
> subject already states what I'm curious about: what software
> instruments (synths, samplers, drum machinees etc.) are you using, what
> is VoiceOver-friendly and so on.
> Coming from Logic Pro myself i have to say PTs selection leaves a lot
> to be disered, although that is a personal taste matter too.
> Anyways, would appreciate any input on this.
> Thanks!
> Joy
>
>
>
> Von meinem iPhone gesendet
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> 

Band in a box in combination with ProTools?

[Christopher-Mark Gilland]

Not to get too off topic, but what I! wanna know, is, has anyone tried 
PG-Music's Band in a Box on the Mac?  I use it quite regularly on the 
Windows side to help with arranging my music, then I take those projects 
over to PT, import the raw wave stem files, and then add whatever else I 
need.  It's bad enough that I have to use JAWS scripts on Windows to get the 
thing to work.  The program is over $500, which right now I can't afford. 
No trial either for the Windows version, or the mac version.  I'd buy the 
thing, but there is no refund policy, and when I called and explained my 
situation, they were quite rude, and very unwilling to work with me.  I love 
their product, but their customer service absolutely stinks, and believe me, 
though respectfully, I let them know it!


I just can't afford gambling $500 or more on something that won't work.  No 
music store in my area has a demo system set up on the mac with it installed 
either.  Otherwise, I'd just set up a time to go in and try it.


Honestly, BIAB is so mission critical to my work, that it's really the only 
reason I've not totally done away with Windows.  If it wasn't for that one 
app, and I do mean, literally! just! that one? app, I'd go macintosh all the 
way, hands down, no questions asked.


Any thoughts?

Chris. 


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools 
Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Round-Call: Software-Instruments for PT

[TheOreoMonster]

Providing you use one of their Contact S series keyboards with Contact then yes 
it will be accessible in later release. 
> On May 25, 2016, at 7:50 AM, Christopher-Mark Gilland  
> wrote:
> 
> Wo! I haven't been following this thread, so forgive me.  Did I hear that 
> Native Instruments is now accessible with ProTools?
> ---
> Christopher Gilland
> JAWS Certified, 2016.
> Training Instructor.
> 
> clgillan...@gmail.com
> Phone: (704) 256-8010.
> - Original Message - From: "Kevin Reeves" 
> To: 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 7:08 AM
> Subject: Re: Round-Call: Software-Instruments for PT
> 
> 
> I have heard the native instruments demo, and it will be ProTools compatible. 
> The self voicing part of this uses the Apple system voice, so it can run 
> standalone or in any plug and host. Really excited for this new turn of 
> events, and the minute that this access  is built into the next version of 
> complete, I will be ordering complete ultimate with the 61 note controller. 
> The built in sounds that come with ProTools suck royally, structure has 
> proven itself to be less than desirable, so I am ready for some really great 
> sounds for ProTools. This type of access couldn't come soon enough.
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On May 24, 2016, at 2:58 PM, Slau Halatyn  wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Joy,
>> 
>> I'd imagine it's the same kind of deal with the OmniSphere stuff. The 
>> trouble, of course, is that, like Native Instruments' stuff, we're talking 
>> about thousands of sounds so saving out presets to TFX format is virtually 
>> inconceivable.
>> 
>> Yes, Rogue Amoeba did put out LoopBack a little while ago and I purchased it 
>> but haven't tried it yet.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Slau
>> 
>>> On May 24, 2016, at 12:30 PM, 'Joy Bausch' via Pro Tools Accessibility 
>>>  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Slau,
>>> thanks so much for your reply. As for your suggestion concerning 
>>> SoundFlower, I checked it out, and it looks like it is currently not 
>>> supported. However, Rogue Amoeba, who apparently were the last 
>>> distributors, now have an add-on available called LoopBack, which does the 
>>> same thing. I'll definitely give that a go, knowing that this Company has 
>>> some other great products out, like Audio Hijack.
>>> Thanks for pointing me that way.
>>> As for virtual instruments, I haven't taken the plunge into buying any, 
>>> mostly because I couldn't find reliable info on what works.
>>> All I know is what we all know: Native Instruments is a no-no. But what 
>>> about Omnisphere or Nexus or something down that road? I'm mainly after 
>>> hig-quality bread-and-butter-sounds, plus orchestral. Of course some 
>>> electronic/synth sounds are always welcome1but since I'm a bit of an 
>>> analogue nerd i would make my own...:)
>>> So any advice on that? I am thinking about giving the NI Komplete Kontrol 
>>> keyboard a try, but if I could find something similar and less costly that 
>>> would be great.
>>> 
>>> Kindest regards, and again thanks.
>>> 
>>> Joy
>>> 
>>> Von meinem iPhone gesendet
>>> 
 Am 24.05.2016 um 17:39 schrieb Slau Halatyn :
 
 Hi Joy,
 
 Pretty much anything that has automation parameters is going to be 
 accessible. The only aspect of virtual plug-ins that is generally not 
 accessible is the presets. Once the presets are accessed and saved as .tfx 
 files, they can be shared. Incidentally, the Logic sounds can be accessed 
 from within Pro Tools by using Soundflower. There are videos and tutorials 
 online on how to do this dating back to Pro Tools version 11. I did it 
 back then and it does work. I haven't done it in a while but it's 
 certainly possible. You might want to look into that. Aside from Logic's 
 stock sounds, which third party virtual instruments have you used in Logic?
 
 Slau
 
> On May 24, 2016, at 1:14 AM, 'Joy Bausch' via Pro Tools Accessibility 
>  wrote:
> 
> Cheers guys,
> subject already states what I'm curious about: what software instruments 
> (synths, samplers, drum machinees etc.) are you using, what is 
> VoiceOver-friendly and so on.
> Coming from Logic Pro myself i have to say PTs selection leaves a lot to 
> be disered, although that is a personal taste matter too.
> Anyways, would appreciate any input on this.
> Thanks!
> Joy
> 
> 
> 
> Von meinem iPhone gesendet
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are 

Re: Round-Call: Software-Instruments for PT

[Christopher-Mark Gilland]

Wo! I haven't been following this thread, so forgive me.  Did I hear that 
Native Instruments is now accessible with ProTools?

---
Christopher Gilland
JAWS Certified, 2016.
Training Instructor.

clgillan...@gmail.com
Phone: (704) 256-8010.
- Original Message - 
From: "Kevin Reeves" 

To: 
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 7:08 AM
Subject: Re: Round-Call: Software-Instruments for PT


I have heard the native instruments demo, and it will be ProTools 
compatible. The self voicing part of this uses the Apple system voice, so it 
can run standalone or in any plug and host. Really excited for this new turn 
of events, and the minute that this access  is built into the next version 
of complete, I will be ordering complete ultimate with the 61 note 
controller. The built in sounds that come with ProTools suck royally, 
structure has proven itself to be less than desirable, so I am ready for 
some really great sounds for ProTools. This type of access couldn't come 
soon enough.


Sent from my iPhone


On May 24, 2016, at 2:58 PM, Slau Halatyn  wrote:

Hi Joy,

I'd imagine it's the same kind of deal with the OmniSphere stuff. The 
trouble, of course, is that, like Native Instruments' stuff, we're talking 
about thousands of sounds so saving out presets to TFX format is virtually 
inconceivable.


Yes, Rogue Amoeba did put out LoopBack a little while ago and I purchased 
it but haven't tried it yet.


Cheers,

Slau

On May 24, 2016, at 12:30 PM, 'Joy Bausch' via Pro Tools Accessibility 
 wrote:


Hi Slau,
thanks so much for your reply. As for your suggestion concerning 
SoundFlower, I checked it out, and it looks like it is currently not 
supported. However, Rogue Amoeba, who apparently were the last 
distributors, now have an add-on available called LoopBack, which does 
the same thing. I'll definitely give that a go, knowing that this Company 
has some other great products out, like Audio Hijack.

Thanks for pointing me that way.
As for virtual instruments, I haven't taken the plunge into buying any, 
mostly because I couldn't find reliable info on what works.
All I know is what we all know: Native Instruments is a no-no. But what 
about Omnisphere or Nexus or something down that road? I'm mainly after 
hig-quality bread-and-butter-sounds, plus orchestral. Of course some 
electronic/synth sounds are always welcome1but since I'm a bit of an 
analogue nerd i would make my own...:)
So any advice on that? I am thinking about giving the NI Komplete Kontrol 
keyboard a try, but if I could find something similar and less costly 
that would be great.


Kindest regards, and again thanks.

Joy

Von meinem iPhone gesendet


Am 24.05.2016 um 17:39 schrieb Slau Halatyn :

Hi Joy,

Pretty much anything that has automation parameters is going to be 
accessible. The only aspect of virtual plug-ins that is generally not 
accessible is the presets. Once the presets are accessed and saved as 
.tfx files, they can be shared. Incidentally, the Logic sounds can be 
accessed from within Pro Tools by using Soundflower. There are videos 
and tutorials online on how to do this dating back to Pro Tools version 
11. I did it back then and it does work. I haven't done it in a while 
but it's certainly possible. You might want to look into that. Aside 
from Logic's stock sounds, which third party virtual instruments have 
you used in Logic?


Slau

On May 24, 2016, at 1:14 AM, 'Joy Bausch' via Pro Tools Accessibility 
 wrote:


Cheers guys,
subject already states what I'm curious about: what software 
instruments (synths, samplers, drum machinees etc.) are you using, what 
is VoiceOver-friendly and so on.
Coming from Logic Pro myself i have to say PTs selection leaves a lot 
to be disered, although that is a personal taste matter too.

Anyways, would appreciate any input on this.
Thanks!
Joy



Von meinem iPhone gesendet

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Pro Tools 

RE: Round-Call: Software-Instruments for PT

[Phil Muir]

This was posted by Rick Alfaro  over on the MIDIMag list.

Posted below is a message from Andre Louis, the person that did the Native
Instruments Complete Control demo file. He asked me to please post this for
him on this list since he is not subscribed. This is a cut and paste from a
Twitter direct message. Feel free to email Andre if you have any questions
or wish to discuss this with him directly.
---Begin message---

Hello everyone.
Firstly, I'd personally like to say that I'm grateful for all the emails
I've received regarding the Native Instruments Komplete Kontrol system with
speech.
I have been asked however, not to disseminate the information to the general
public, as such.
I am free to discuss it, and even to show the demo as I have done, but I
sent it to individuals, not to a mailing list. As it is unreleased software,
of course it is subject to change without warning, and because of that, it
is not up for discussion in-public. that also means via methods available to
those using a search engine.
For queries, you will come directly to myself, available on twitter freely
via @OnjMusic, or if you prefer email, please use onj.lo...@gmail.com.

The contact I have cultivated at NI is incredibly willing to hear from you
all with any questions, but has asked that I pass them along so he doesn't
get too bombarded with emails.
I respect that he's allowing me to discuss this at all, so please respect
the decision not to discuss my demo in a public forum. I'm not asking for
much, other than to stay out of potential trouble with a company who is just
now willing to work with us on providing access to software we previously
did not have access to.

Kindly abide by this and we will have no problems at all. I myself have just
purchased the Komplete Kontrol S61 and await access to the software.
I fully intend to do a live Q session with interested parties when it
arrives, and we can work something out at a date convenient to those
interested in this topic.

Sincerely

Andre Louis

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Round-Call: Software-Instruments for PT

[Kevin Reeves]

I was asked not to share it. 
The version of complete that will incorporate this accessibility feature will 
be coming out in credibly soon. Then, I think Andre will allow people to share 
the demo. He showed it to a couple of us. I'm not sure who shared it over on 
the other list, but they did so without his consent.


Sent from my iPhone

> On May 25, 2016, at 7:12 AM, Sean A. Cummins  wrote:
> 
> Kevin,
> 
> Can you share the link to the demo?
> 
> Sean
> 
> 
>> On 5/25/16, Kevin Reeves  wrote:
>> I have heard the native instruments demo, and it will be ProTools
>> compatible. The self voicing part of this uses the Apple system voice, so it
>> can run standalone or in any plug and host. Really excited for this new turn
>> of events, and the minute that this access  is built into the next version
>> of complete, I will be ordering complete ultimate with the 61 note
>> controller. The built in sounds that come with ProTools suck royally,
>> structure has proven itself to be less than desirable, so I am ready for
>> some really great sounds for ProTools. This type of access couldn't come
>> soon enough.
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On May 24, 2016, at 2:58 PM, Slau Halatyn  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Joy,
>>> 
>>> I'd imagine it's the same kind of deal with the OmniSphere stuff. The
>>> trouble, of course, is that, like Native Instruments' stuff, we're talking
>>> about thousands of sounds so saving out presets to TFX format is virtually
>>> inconceivable.
>>> 
>>> Yes, Rogue Amoeba did put out LoopBack a little while ago and I purchased
>>> it but haven't tried it yet.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> 
>>> Slau
>>> 
 On May 24, 2016, at 12:30 PM, 'Joy Bausch' via Pro Tools Accessibility
  wrote:
 
 Hi Slau,
 thanks so much for your reply. As for your suggestion concerning
 SoundFlower, I checked it out, and it looks like it is currently not
 supported. However, Rogue Amoeba, who apparently were the last
 distributors, now have an add-on available called LoopBack, which does
 the same thing. I'll definitely give that a go, knowing that this Company
 has some other great products out, like Audio Hijack.
 Thanks for pointing me that way.
 As for virtual instruments, I haven't taken the plunge into buying any,
 mostly because I couldn't find reliable info on what works.
 All I know is what we all know: Native Instruments is a no-no. But what
 about Omnisphere or Nexus or something down that road? I'm mainly after
 hig-quality bread-and-butter-sounds, plus orchestral. Of course some
 electronic/synth sounds are always welcome1but since I'm a bit of an
 analogue nerd i would make my own...:)
 So any advice on that? I am thinking about giving the NI Komplete Kontrol
 keyboard a try, but if I could find something similar and less costly
 that would be great.
 
 Kindest regards, and again thanks.
 
 Joy
 
 Von meinem iPhone gesendet
 
> Am 24.05.2016 um 17:39 schrieb Slau Halatyn :
> 
> Hi Joy,
> 
> Pretty much anything that has automation parameters is going to be
> accessible. The only aspect of virtual plug-ins that is generally not
> accessible is the presets. Once the presets are accessed and saved as
> .tfx files, they can be shared. Incidentally, the Logic sounds can be
> accessed from within Pro Tools by using Soundflower. There are videos
> and tutorials online on how to do this dating back to Pro Tools version
> 11. I did it back then and it does work. I haven't done it in a while
> but it's certainly possible. You might want to look into that. Aside
> from Logic's stock sounds, which third party virtual instruments have
> you used in Logic?
> 
> Slau
> 
>> On May 24, 2016, at 1:14 AM, 'Joy Bausch' via Pro Tools Accessibility
>>  wrote:
>> 
>> Cheers guys,
>> subject already states what I'm curious about: what software
>> instruments (synths, samplers, drum machinees etc.) are you using, what
>> is VoiceOver-friendly and so on.
>> Coming from Logic Pro myself i have to say PTs selection leaves a lot
>> to be disered, although that is a personal taste matter too.
>> Anyways, would appreciate any input on this.
>> Thanks!
>> Joy
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Von meinem iPhone gesendet
>> 
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>> an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.

Re: Round-Call: Software-Instruments for PT

[Sean A. Cummins]

Kevin,

Can you share the link to the demo?

Sean


On 5/25/16, Kevin Reeves  wrote:
> I have heard the native instruments demo, and it will be ProTools
> compatible. The self voicing part of this uses the Apple system voice, so it
> can run standalone or in any plug and host. Really excited for this new turn
> of events, and the minute that this access  is built into the next version
> of complete, I will be ordering complete ultimate with the 61 note
> controller. The built in sounds that come with ProTools suck royally,
> structure has proven itself to be less than desirable, so I am ready for
> some really great sounds for ProTools. This type of access couldn't come
> soon enough.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On May 24, 2016, at 2:58 PM, Slau Halatyn  wrote:
>>
>> Hi Joy,
>>
>> I'd imagine it's the same kind of deal with the OmniSphere stuff. The
>> trouble, of course, is that, like Native Instruments' stuff, we're talking
>> about thousands of sounds so saving out presets to TFX format is virtually
>> inconceivable.
>>
>> Yes, Rogue Amoeba did put out LoopBack a little while ago and I purchased
>> it but haven't tried it yet.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Slau
>>
>>> On May 24, 2016, at 12:30 PM, 'Joy Bausch' via Pro Tools Accessibility
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Slau,
>>> thanks so much for your reply. As for your suggestion concerning
>>> SoundFlower, I checked it out, and it looks like it is currently not
>>> supported. However, Rogue Amoeba, who apparently were the last
>>> distributors, now have an add-on available called LoopBack, which does
>>> the same thing. I'll definitely give that a go, knowing that this Company
>>> has some other great products out, like Audio Hijack.
>>> Thanks for pointing me that way.
>>> As for virtual instruments, I haven't taken the plunge into buying any,
>>> mostly because I couldn't find reliable info on what works.
>>> All I know is what we all know: Native Instruments is a no-no. But what
>>> about Omnisphere or Nexus or something down that road? I'm mainly after
>>> hig-quality bread-and-butter-sounds, plus orchestral. Of course some
>>> electronic/synth sounds are always welcome1but since I'm a bit of an
>>> analogue nerd i would make my own...:)
>>> So any advice on that? I am thinking about giving the NI Komplete Kontrol
>>> keyboard a try, but if I could find something similar and less costly
>>> that would be great.
>>>
>>> Kindest regards, and again thanks.
>>>
>>> Joy
>>>
>>> Von meinem iPhone gesendet
>>>
 Am 24.05.2016 um 17:39 schrieb Slau Halatyn :

 Hi Joy,

 Pretty much anything that has automation parameters is going to be
 accessible. The only aspect of virtual plug-ins that is generally not
 accessible is the presets. Once the presets are accessed and saved as
 .tfx files, they can be shared. Incidentally, the Logic sounds can be
 accessed from within Pro Tools by using Soundflower. There are videos
 and tutorials online on how to do this dating back to Pro Tools version
 11. I did it back then and it does work. I haven't done it in a while
 but it's certainly possible. You might want to look into that. Aside
 from Logic's stock sounds, which third party virtual instruments have
 you used in Logic?

 Slau

> On May 24, 2016, at 1:14 AM, 'Joy Bausch' via Pro Tools Accessibility
>  wrote:
>
> Cheers guys,
> subject already states what I'm curious about: what software
> instruments (synths, samplers, drum machinees etc.) are you using, what
> is VoiceOver-friendly and so on.
> Coming from Logic Pro myself i have to say PTs selection leaves a lot
> to be disered, although that is a personal taste matter too.
> Anyways, would appreciate any input on this.
> Thanks!
> Joy
>
>
>
> Von meinem iPhone gesendet
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because 

Re: Round-Call: Software-Instruments for PT

[Kevin Reeves]

I have heard the native instruments demo, and it will be ProTools compatible. 
The self voicing part of this uses the Apple system voice, so it can run 
standalone or in any plug and host. Really excited for this new turn of events, 
and the minute that this access  is built into the next version of complete, I 
will be ordering complete ultimate with the 61 note controller. The built in 
sounds that come with ProTools suck royally, structure has proven itself to be 
less than desirable, so I am ready for some really great sounds for ProTools. 
This type of access couldn't come soon enough. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On May 24, 2016, at 2:58 PM, Slau Halatyn  wrote:
> 
> Hi Joy,
> 
> I'd imagine it's the same kind of deal with the OmniSphere stuff. The 
> trouble, of course, is that, like Native Instruments' stuff, we're talking 
> about thousands of sounds so saving out presets to TFX format is virtually 
> inconceivable.
> 
> Yes, Rogue Amoeba did put out LoopBack a little while ago and I purchased it 
> but haven't tried it yet.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Slau
> 
>> On May 24, 2016, at 12:30 PM, 'Joy Bausch' via Pro Tools Accessibility 
>>  wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Slau,
>> thanks so much for your reply. As for your suggestion concerning 
>> SoundFlower, I checked it out, and it looks like it is currently not 
>> supported. However, Rogue Amoeba, who apparently were the last distributors, 
>> now have an add-on available called LoopBack, which does the same thing. 
>> I'll definitely give that a go, knowing that this Company has some other 
>> great products out, like Audio Hijack.
>> Thanks for pointing me that way.
>> As for virtual instruments, I haven't taken the plunge into buying any, 
>> mostly because I couldn't find reliable info on what works. 
>> All I know is what we all know: Native Instruments is a no-no. But what 
>> about Omnisphere or Nexus or something down that road? I'm mainly after 
>> hig-quality bread-and-butter-sounds, plus orchestral. Of course some 
>> electronic/synth sounds are always welcome1but since I'm a bit of an 
>> analogue nerd i would make my own...:)
>> So any advice on that? I am thinking about giving the NI Komplete Kontrol 
>> keyboard a try, but if I could find something similar and less costly that 
>> would be great.
>> 
>> Kindest regards, and again thanks.
>> 
>> Joy
>> 
>> Von meinem iPhone gesendet
>> 
>>> Am 24.05.2016 um 17:39 schrieb Slau Halatyn :
>>> 
>>> Hi Joy,
>>> 
>>> Pretty much anything that has automation parameters is going to be 
>>> accessible. The only aspect of virtual plug-ins that is generally not 
>>> accessible is the presets. Once the presets are accessed and saved as .tfx 
>>> files, they can be shared. Incidentally, the Logic sounds can be accessed 
>>> from within Pro Tools by using Soundflower. There are videos and tutorials 
>>> online on how to do this dating back to Pro Tools version 11. I did it back 
>>> then and it does work. I haven't done it in a while but it's certainly 
>>> possible. You might want to look into that. Aside from Logic's stock 
>>> sounds, which third party virtual instruments have you used in Logic?
>>> 
>>> Slau
>>> 
 On May 24, 2016, at 1:14 AM, 'Joy Bausch' via Pro Tools Accessibility 
  wrote:
 
 Cheers guys, 
 subject already states what I'm curious about: what software instruments 
 (synths, samplers, drum machinees etc.) are you using, what is 
 VoiceOver-friendly and so on.
 Coming from Logic Pro myself i have to say PTs selection leaves a lot to 
 be disered, although that is a personal taste matter too.
 Anyways, would appreciate any input on this.
 Thanks!
 Joy
 
 
 
 Von meinem iPhone gesendet
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email