Re: Need some EQ lessons

[Matt Diemert]

Right me off list and I could help you out. 


Sent from my iPhone

> On Jun 8, 2022, at 11:18 AM, Dammie Onafeko  wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi guys:
> 
> A great day to you all. I am in need of some EQ lessons, and I'm thinking if 
> anyone would be willing to show me some nitty gritty things. I would greatly 
> appreciate any help. Thanks for your anticipated time and support.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Dammie
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/CAN%3Dh5d9XWTyDFQc%2BM_xDsCM_ijpKQ%2Byj5DVB0N%3DcsPT_9hmh%2BQ%40mail.gmail.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/330049BD-EBE1-4BA8-95B4-339D9245E68B%40gmail.com.

Re: Attention Matt Diemert

[Matt Diemert]

Hello, 
I'm just waiting for the tutorials and sample track to come back from 
mastering. 

Things are on track for a late October Release. 
Hth. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 2, 2020, at 3:10 PM, clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> 
> Sorry, couldn't find your private e-mail address in my contacts.
>  
> Was wondering the status on the ProTools with Speech corse. I know you were 
> making an updated version. I'd like to buy it, if it's ready.
>  
> Chris.
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/0abb01d698ef%24b85b1170%2429113450%24%40gmail.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/41CA5C45-5A73-4AB4-80F5-50344F238A7A%40gmail.com.

watching level monitor with flo tools in pt 2020."5

[Matt Diemert]

Hi all, 
Just set up a brand new mac book today with pt and flo tools etc. 
However when I double press l on a track to get the level read out nothing 
happens.  It's passing signal as I can hear the microphone and it records fine. 
Any thoughts On what I might be missing here. 
Works perfectly fine on my old iMac 2012 

Thanks for any suggestions   

Sent from my iPhone

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/BE35A302-8EF3-44A2-BD35-9C0659B7309F%40gmail.com.

Re: Whatsapp group

[Matt Diemert]

Just an for the record, 
running 2 older imac's with 8Gb of ram here with latest pt blotools and km, 
with a complete suite of ua plugs, and a bunch others, have probably had one or 
two cpu over loads within the past year, and typically happened on sessions of 
80 or more tracks. 
So, while I agree that 8Gb is less than ideal, I'd be surprised if that's the 
exact culprit here.. Best: 
Matt 
 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 22, 2020, at 6:13 PM, Devin Oxman  wrote:
> 
> Count me in on that as well
> Devin
> 
>> On Apr 21, 2020, at 4:08 PM, Steven  wrote:
>> 
>> I would also like to join the ‎WhatsApp group
>> 
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Steven Salas
>> Vice-President
>> Austin Council of the Blind  
>> 
 On Apr 21, 2020, at 3:00 PM, Christopher Gilland  
 wrote:
>>> 
>>> Guys, I'd love to join the whatsapp group,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Can someone send me the info? I do have Whatsapp installed, I think. If not 
>>> though I can get it again really really really easily.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Chris.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/cdffdd3d-a023-84a4-5d4e-478ca24da2bc%40gmail.com.
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/735FC582-23CF-4851-814D-FC3B511E4228%40gmail.com.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/C24C9F67-4772-4600-88E3-E8D369F2333E%40gmail.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/323BBA64-DD3F-490B-A9D0-2E4283CE8543%40gmail.com.

Re: Formal professional pro tools training for the blind and visually impaired

[Matt Diemert]

Also, just a quick mention, that I plan to release Pro Tools with Speech 2.0 in 
the next month or so. 
This version will go deeper than the previous release: as of now the sections 
are recording, editing, mixing, 
mastering, and releasing a track. 
I walk through the entire process including releasing a new song to iTunes and 
spotify via distrokid. 

More details coming very soon! 


Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 19, 2020, at 10:13 AM, Jay Paschal  wrote:
> 
> I can testify for IC Music, great training and thorough!
> 
> “Be who you desire & desire who you wish to be”Sent from my iPhone
> 
>>> On Apr 19, 2020, at 8:20 AM, Byron Harden  wrote:
>>> 
>> Good morning Mr. Baskis, Byron here from I See Music llc where we train the 
>> totally blind and visually impaired in audio production and studio 
>> engineering as it pertains to adaptive tech and techniques. Please feel free 
>> to explore all options of training per our web site, which I’ll link you to 
>> here below. Hope you and your family are remaining healthy and safe in these 
>> crazy times Mr. Baskis. If you have any further questions after reviewing 
>> the site, I’ll look forward to speaking with you soon sir and enjoy the rest 
>> of your weekend.
>> best
>> www.iseemusic.org
>> 
>>> On Apr 18, 2020, at 4:04 PM, Christopher Gilland  
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Yes. I got your message privately. I'll be reaching out soon.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Chris.
>>> 
 On 04/18/2020 04:20 PM, Steve Baskis wrote:
 Chris, I wrote you a personal email off of the PT access groups message 
 board. Not sure if it went to your junk or if you got it, but would love 
 to speak about training whenever you’re free. First I would like to get to 
 know you and understand your services though.
 
 Thanks,
 Steve
 
> On Apr 18, 2020, at 14:50, Chris Gilland  wrote:
> 
> Hey steve.
> 
> I train individuals on PT, so if I can be of any help, let me know.
> 
> $35.00USD via PayPal, with a minimum 1 hour commitment payment must be 
> received up front before training begins.
> 
> Chris.
> 
>> On Apr 18, 2020, at 1:08 PM, steve baskis  wrote:
>> 
>> Slau or anybody else,
>> 
>> Is there any professional training out there for Utilizing flo 
>> tools/ProTools From a blind/visually impaired perspective? I understand 
>> that there are a lot of formal well produced videos on ProTools 
>> specifically, but what about for the blind and visually impaired? Are 
>> there mentors, or people who are willing to teach individuals for a 
>> hourly rate? I am wondering because it seems like the community is 
>> expanding and the world is becoming more accessible every year. I would 
>> like to refer people or push the information on the web and make more 
>> people aware of what is possible. I do understand that we are a minority 
>> in the sense of blindness and visual impairments and especially sound 
>> engineering, but doesn’t hurt to ask.
>> 
>> Respectfully,
>> Steve Baskis
>> Baskis.com
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>> Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>> an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/B1529AE6-F295-4E74-B616-D2BD92EB8CB3%40gmail.com.
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/4B1BE438-2E85-4502-9132-E188E9F95637%40gmail.com.
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/c527ba92-d9c1-8dc8-8204-f3eb05e232f2%40gmail.com.
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/080FA2EB-FCCE-4B4C-B7D3-A9D5691BF117%40gmail.com.
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view 

Re: virtual Numpad

[Matt Diemert]

> Finally got around to trying this, thanks for the tip, worked just as you 
> suggested! 

> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Sep 11, 2019, at 6:30 PM, Slau Halatyn  wrote:
> 
> Hi Matt,
> 
> Not sure if this is related but sometimes the VEK decides it's not going to 
> work and the way to get it back is to go to the Menu Extras menu and quit VEK 
> then go to the application itself and relaunch it. Let me know if that solves 
> the issue.
> Best,
> Slau
> 
> 
> On Sep 11, 2019, at 5:50 PM, mcdiem...@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> Hi all, just a quick question. 
> Have latest PT 2019, and flotools installed.  Recently for some reason the 
> virtual numberpad has stopped working. As far as I can tell everything else 
> works as expected, but this feature no longer works. 
> Any thoughts as to what could be going on here. 
> All My best:
> Matt.  www.mattcarsonmusic.com
>  
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/008701d568ea%24e1aac9c0%24a5005d40%24%40gmail.com.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/45D40FC9-572C-4B76-855A-BFCBD0E8F039%40gmail.com.
> 
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/40BEF4FA-B33E-4A9B-B4DB-FB59A1FD5451%40gmail.com.

Re: best way to learn protools. Question for Matt

[Matt Diemert]

You can reach me at 
mcdiem...@gmail.com 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jun 24, 2019, at 4:08 PM, Nathaniel Kile  wrote:
> 
> Hello Matt,
> Can you pass your email my way?
> Mine is, heavens4r...@gmail.com
>  
>  
>  
> Nate Kile,
> Assistive Technology Instructor, Tech Vision
> Specialist in Technology/Training/Teaching for blind/low vision/virtual 
> instruction for schools
> Also Private training to your needs
> 907-444-3707
> Website with hundreds of informational articles & lessons on PC, Office 
> products, Mac, iPad/iTools and more, all done with keystrokes: 
> www.yourtechvision.com
>  
>  
> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com  On Behalf Of Matt 
> Diemert
> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 4:54 PM
> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: best way to learn protools.
>  
> If you write me off list, I can help you out. 
> Thanks. 
> Matt Diemert. 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Apr 17, 2019, at 8:39 PM, Katie Zodrow  wrote:
> 
> Hi Chris. Thanks for explaining how Matt does the ProTools with Speech 
> tutorials. This sounds great. I know the website has been down for a while, 
> but where can I purchase the tutorials if I decide I want to get them?
> Thanks.
> Katie
> 
> On Apr 17, 2019, at 5:03 PM, Christopher Gilland  
> wrote:
>  
> Ricky, I couldn't have said it better! I agree 100 million percent. The 
> material is a little bit outdated, I'll admit that, but for what you get, 
> it's absolutely phenomenal! In fact, I even find myself two years out from 
> purchasing it going back and reviewing things over and over. There are just 
> so many things Matt covers in this tutorial. Especially in the editing 
> section. I've gotta say, I would never be where I am today with PT had I not 
> gotten the PTWS tutorials. Words cannot even express how greatful I am to 
> Matt for putting them together. It really! truly helped me embrace the DAW at 
> my own pace, feeling extremely comfortable along the way. And what I love is, 
> he doesn't, for those who haven't heard it, just lecture you like, to do X, 
> do Y. Once Y's done, jump on your head, bark like a dog, then oink like a 
> pig. LOL! In all seriousness though, he actually goes through, does it, and 
> let's you hear, and shows you.
>  
> What I also like is, he not only shows you what to do, but also what not! to 
> do. There were a few places where he obviously undoes the action, but he 
> actually very intentionally epically breaks things in his mix a bit, just to 
> show you why certain things would not be a good idea in certain contexts. 
> This way, you kind of have that Aa! OK moment.
>  
> I absolutely would say he's gained my full trust. If he ever makes an updated 
> version of these tutorials, even if we don't get them complementary since we 
> already bought the original, and even if we get no discount for already being 
> a customer, that's fine. I'd still purchase them in a heartbeat with 
> absolutely no hesitation.
>  
> Chris.
> On 04/17/2019 02:08 PM, Ricky Prevatte wrote:
> Great job on the album mat. Folks I highly recommend Protools with speech 
> even though it is a little old this is a great thing. If you have to travel 
> at a higher pace then pay the cost for a more expensive class it will make 
> you the boss. But if you are traveling slow like me Protools with speech is 
> the way to go I would also say the Protools with speech should be a 
> prerequisite. It will help you to understand what you need to ask Byrin and 
> others. I still refer to it even today. absolutely.
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Apr 16, 2019, at 10:45 PM, Kurt Lantz  wrote:
> 
> Hey! Good job Matt! It sounds very good!
> 
> blindm...@gmail.com
>  
>  
> 
> On Apr 16, 2019, at 5:57 AM, Matt Diemert  wrote:
> 
>  Steve, 
> Rob and I tracked and mixed all this in pro tools. 
>  
> Hope you enjoy it. 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Apr 16, 2019, at 2:31 AM, Steve Sparrow  wrote:
> 
> Hey matt. i’m keen to hear the album. I’ll check it out some time this week. 
> Out of interest did you record it yourself, or parts of it. I’d be interested 
> in this.
> Steve
>  
> 
> 
> On 16 Apr 2019, at 12:00 am, Matt Diemert  wrote:
>  
> Cris, 
> Just look up Matt Carson on apple music. 
> The name of the album is no regrets. 
>  
>  
> Matt Diemert 
> Check out my music at
> www.mattcarsonmusic.com
> Folow me on Facebook at 
> www.facebook.com/mattcarsonmusic
>  
> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com  On Behalf Of 
> Christopher Gilland
> Sent: Monday, April 15, 2019 9:56 AM
> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: best way to learn protools.
>  
> Matt,
>  
> Is your country

Re: best way to learn protools.

[Matt Diemert]

If you write me off list, I can help you out. 
Thanks. 
Matt Diemert. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 17, 2019, at 8:39 PM, Katie Zodrow  wrote:
> 
> Hi Chris. Thanks for explaining how Matt does the ProTools with Speech 
> tutorials. This sounds great. I know the website has been down for a while, 
> but where can I purchase the tutorials if I decide I want to get them?
>> Thanks.
> Katie
>> On Apr 17, 2019, at 5:03 PM, Christopher Gilland  
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Ricky, I couldn't have said it better! I agree 100 million percent. The 
>> material is a little bit outdated, I'll admit that, but for what you get, 
>> it's absolutely phenomenal! In fact, I even find myself two years out from 
>> purchasing it going back and reviewing things over and over. There are just 
>> so many things Matt covers in this tutorial. Especially in the editing 
>> section. I've gotta say, I would never be where I am today with PT had I not 
>> gotten the PTWS tutorials. Words cannot even express how greatful I am to 
>> Matt for putting them together. It really! truly helped me embrace the DAW 
>> at my own pace, feeling extremely comfortable along the way. And what I love 
>> is, he doesn't, for those who haven't heard it, just lecture you like, to do 
>> X, do Y. Once Y's done, jump on your head, bark like a dog, then oink like a 
>> pig. LOL! In all seriousness though, he actually goes through, does it, and 
>> let's you hear, and shows you.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> What I also like is, he not only shows you what to do, but also what not! to 
>> do. There were a few places where he obviously undoes the action, but he 
>> actually very intentionally epically breaks things in his mix a bit, just to 
>> show you why certain things would not be a good idea in certain contexts. 
>> This way, you kind of have that Aa! OK moment.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> I absolutely would say he's gained my full trust. If he ever makes an 
>> updated version of these tutorials, even if we don't get them complementary 
>> since we already bought the original, and even if we get no discount for 
>> already being a customer, that's fine. I'd still purchase them in a 
>> heartbeat with absolutely no hesitation.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Chris.
>> 
>>> On 04/17/2019 02:08 PM, Ricky Prevatte wrote:
>>> Great job on the album mat. Folks I highly recommend Protools with speech 
>>> even though it is a little old this is a great thing. If you have to travel 
>>> at a higher pace then pay the cost for a more expensive class it will make 
>>> you the boss. But if you are traveling slow like me Protools with speech is 
>>> the way to go I would also say the Protools with speech should be a 
>>> prerequisite. It will help you to understand what you need to ask Byrin and 
>>> others. I still refer to it even today. absolutely.
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>> On Apr 16, 2019, at 10:45 PM, Kurt Lantz  wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hey! Good job Matt! It sounds very good!
>>>> 
>>>> blindm...@gmail.com
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Apr 16, 2019, at 5:57 AM, Matt Diemert  wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>  Steve, 
>>>>> Rob and I tracked and mixed all this in pro tools. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hope you enjoy it. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Apr 16, 2019, at 2:31 AM, Steve Sparrow  
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hey matt. i’m keen to hear the album. I’ll check it out some time this 
>>>>>> week. Out of interest did you record it yourself, or parts of it. I’d be 
>>>>>> interested in this.
>>>>>> Steve
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 16 Apr 2019, at 12:00 am, Matt Diemert  wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Cris, 
>>>>>>> Just look up Matt Carson on apple music. 
>>>>>>> The name of the album is no regrets. 
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> Matt Diemert 
>>>>>>> Check out my music at
>>>>>>> www.mattcarsonmusic.com
>>>>>>> Folow me on Facebook at 
>>>>>>> www.facebook.com/mattcarsonmusic
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com  On Behalf 
>>>>>>> Of Christopher Gilland
>>>>>>> Sent: Monday,

Re: best way to learn protools.

[Matt Diemert]

 Steve, 
Rob and I tracked and mixed all this in pro tools. 

Hope you enjoy it. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 16, 2019, at 2:31 AM, Steve Sparrow  wrote:
> 
> Hey matt. i’m keen to hear the album. I’ll check it out some time this week. 
> Out of interest did you record it yourself, or parts of it. I’d be interested 
> in this.
> Steve
> 
> 
>> On 16 Apr 2019, at 12:00 am, Matt Diemert  wrote:
>> 
>> Cris, 
>> Just look up Matt Carson on apple music. 
>> The name of the album is no regrets. 
>>  
>>  
>> Matt Diemert 
>> Check out my music at
>> www.mattcarsonmusic.com
>> Folow me on Facebook at 
>> www.facebook.com/mattcarsonmusic
>>  
>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com  On Behalf Of 
>> Christopher Gilland
>> Sent: Monday, April 15, 2019 9:56 AM
>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
>> Subject: Re: best way to learn protools.
>>  
>> Matt,
>>  
>> Is your country album released yet which you speak of? I'd absolutely love 
>> to hear it if so. I've got access to Apple Music, or could bill it to my 
>> AT wireless account with my Android phone, provided it's on Google Play 
>> Music. It would probably be easiest though for me to stream it with my A.M 
>> subscription, like I have done with your Christian E.P, which BTW, if you 
>> guys have not heard, you're intensely missing out; as it is excellent!
>>  
>> Chris.
>>> On 04/15/2019 09:52 AM, Matt Diemert wrote:
>>> Good morning all, 
>>> I apologize for the delay but wanted to speak on this briefly. 
>>>  
>>> I’ve been working on releasing my own country album for the past year and a 
>>> half and it took up nearly every free moment I had available.  Then, when I 
>>> started getting some ideas together for PT 12, 2019 was announced, and I 
>>> figured we better hold off, so that I didn’t create something only to have 
>>> it out of date again. 
>>> I have recorded along while making this album, so hope to release some new 
>>> tutorials soon.  I do hope to update our materials later this year.  In the 
>>> mean time, if anyone wishes to purchase the PTWS tutorials, feel free to 
>>> email me privately, and I can still provide a secure link. 
>>> Feel free to email off list if I can answer any questions. 
>>> All my best. 
>>> 
>>>  
>>> Matt Diemert 
>>> Check out my music at
>>> www.mattcarsonmusic.com
>>> Folow me on Facebook at 
>>> www.facebook.com/mattcarsonmusic
>>>  
>>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com  On Behalf Of 
>>> jimmie smith
>>> Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2019 3:56 PM
>>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
>>> Subject: Re: best way to learn protools.
>>>  
>>>  I am not able to find those tutorials. It seems that the website is no 
>>> longer available. Does anyone still have these? I would love to read all of 
>>> them. 
>>>  
>>>  
>>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com on behalf of Steve Sparrow 
>>> 
>>> Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2019 4:27 AM
>>> To: 'Joy Bausch' via Pro Tools Accessibility
>>> Subject: Re: best way to learn protools. 
>>>  
>>> I can still voutch for protools with speech. It might be a bit out of date 
>>> sure. Matt and Robb did those tutorials on protools 10. There is a lot more 
>>> accessibility these days, with the wonderful flo tools and some new 
>>> features, But most of the concepts haven’t changed that much. That is how I 
>>> learned protools and i’d say if it’s still available it would still be a 
>>> good way to learn protools out of the box. and then deal with flotools as 
>>> you go along. You might find the odd short cut has changed, but most of it 
>>> is still relevant. I don’t know how I would have done it if it had not been 
>>> for protools with speech. I still refer back to this tutorial at times  
>>> Steve
>>>  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 13 Apr 2019, at 6:52 am, Ronald J Glaser  
>>>> wrote:
>>>>  
>>>> This is true, you did say you would do this. 
>>>> What is interesting is that the protools with speech web site does not 
>>>> have anything that is upto date for the newest versions of Protools.
>>>> With the courses that are offered on the web site, what in the lines of 
>>>> voiceover accessibility do they cover? Just wondering.
>>>>> On 4/12/2019 3:34 PM, Christopher Gilland wrote:
>>>>> Ron, ha

RE: best way to learn protools.

[Matt Diemert]

Good morning all, 

I apologize for the delay but wanted to speak on this briefly. 

 

I’ve been working on releasing my own country album for the past year and a 
half and it took up nearly every free moment I had available.  Then, when I 
started getting some ideas together for PT 12, 2019 was announced, and I 
figured we better hold off, so that I didn’t create something only to have it 
out of date again. 

I have recorded along while making this album, so hope to release some new 
tutorials soon.  I do hope to update our materials later this year.  In the 
mean time, if anyone wishes to purchase the PTWS tutorials, feel free to email 
me privately, and I can still provide a secure link. 

Feel free to email off list if I can answer any questions. 

All my best. 



 

Matt Diemert 

Check out my music at

 <http://www.mattcarsonmusic.com> www.mattcarsonmusic.com 

Folow me on Facebook at 

 <http://www.facebook.com/mattcarsonmusic> www.facebook.com/mattcarsonmusic 

 

From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com  On Behalf Of jimmie 
smith
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2019 3:56 PM
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: best way to learn protools.

 

 I am not able to find those tutorials. It seems that the website is no longer 
available. Does anyone still have these? I would love to read all of them. 

 

 

  _  

From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com>  on behalf 
of Steve Sparrow mailto:i...@sparrowsound.com.au> >
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2019 4:27 AM
To: 'Joy Bausch' via Pro Tools Accessibility
Subject: Re: best way to learn protools. 

 

I can still voutch for protools with speech. It might be a bit out of date 
sure. Matt and Robb did those tutorials on protools 10. There is a lot more 
accessibility these days, with the wonderful flo tools and some new features, 
But most of the concepts haven’t changed that much. That is how I learned 
protools and i’d say if it’s still available it would still be a good way to 
learn protools out of the box. and then deal with flotools as you go along. You 
might find the odd short cut has changed, but most of it is still relevant. I 
don’t know how I would have done it if it had not been for protools with 
speech. I still refer back to this tutorial at times  

Steve

 





On 13 Apr 2019, at 6:52 am, Ronald J Glaser mailto:ronaldjglas...@gmail.com> > wrote:

 

This is true, you did say you would do this. 

What is interesting is that the protools with speech web site does not have 
anything that is upto date for the newest versions of Protools.

With the courses that are offered on the web site, what in the lines of 
voiceover accessibility do they cover? Just wondering.

On 4/12/2019 3:34 PM, Christopher Gilland wrote:

Ron, have I not also agreed to work with you one on one? And, I even told you, 
I'd not charge you anything.

 

Chris.

On 04/12/2019 03:06 PM, Ronald J Glaser wrote:

>From what i am seeing here, the Courses are about 800 dollars. If I am looking 
>at the web site correctly.

 

On 4/12/2019 12:35 PM, Steven wrote:

Is this like a one on one thing, or is it a classroom setting online?

Cheers,

Steven Salas


On Apr 12, 2019, at 11:33 AM, Michael Holmes mailto:m.richard.hol...@gmail.com> > wrote:

Hi Richard, 

 

I can personally vouch for the quality of learning from I See Music. It would 
be hard to put the training into a prerecorded format, because there are many 
different approaches and workflows which benefit the most from live instruction 
and discussion. I started the PT course with Jason Dasent having already known 
a lot about the topics, and still picked up a lot of workflow enhancements and 
different mixing techniques I learned through discussion.

 

I hope my input has helped explain things.

 

Best,

Mike

Sent from my iPhone


On 12 Apr 2019, at 11:50, Richard Corey mailto:rickcore...@gmail.com> > wrote:

Hey Byron, do you also have videos where we can listen to them? 

Ricky





On Apr 12, 2019, at 9:44 AM, Byron Harden mailto:sticomu...@gmail.com> > wrote:

 

GOOD MORNING RONALD, I AM BYRON HARDEN FROM I SEE MUSIC WARE WE TRAIN THE BLIND 
IN AUDIO PRODUCTION AS IT PERTAINS TO ACCESSIBILITY. PRO TOOLS IS ONE OF OUR 
COURSES OFFERED IN MULTIPLE FORMATS. IF YOU WOULD LIKE FURTHER INFO, YOU CAN 
VISIT WWW.ISEEMUSIC.ORG <http://www.iseemusic.org/>   or ring me at 
(312)(810)-1001, for any additional question you may have.  

best





On Apr 12, 2019, at 7:39 AM, Ronald J Glaser mailto:ronaldjglas...@gmail.com> > wrote:

 

What is the best source to learn protools? I am just starting out like I had 
said a while back. I have protools 2018.12 I believe and am wondering. this. 
are there any free/ or paid Courses  to learn Protools for the blind?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop recei

Re: Any news on the PT with Speech Website?

[Matt Diemert]

Hello, 
Working away at getting up and running! As I'm sure you know updating 
everything can take some time. Stay tuned, and I'll be sure to post when we're 
back up! 
Thanks. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Sep 8, 2018, at 1:17 PM, Steve Matzura  wrote:
> 
> I tried going there today and got redirected somewhere Malwarebytes didn't 
> like. This bodes ill methinks. However, I checked with http://www.whois.net 
> and learned that this site does still exist, is registered with GoDaddy, was 
> last updated in July, and will expire next July. Matt or Rob, any news on 
> this?
> 
> 
> P.S.: Just tried it again, this time from the link on the YouTube page, and 
> got an error I've never seen before--"Too many requests." Badness.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Pro tools with speech still active

[Matt Diemert]

Nate, thanks for bringing this to my attention. Apparently we have an outage, 
I'm working now to get everything up, With it being a holiday weekend, this 
might not happen unil early in the week Thanks again. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Dec 22, 2017, at 7:37 PM, Nathaniel Kile  wrote:
> 
> Hello everyone,
> Whenever I try to go to pro tools with speech, the page will not load. I have 
> been trying for the last two days. Is the page still available?
> I have tried on two different computers as well as my phone. If it is due to 
> my internet security, this is not a good sign for the page because I have 
> very minimal settings and 99% of pages load for me with out any problems.
> Thanks for any thoughts,
> Nate Kile,
> Assistive Technology Instructor, Tech Vision
> Specialist in Technology/Training/Teaching for blind/low vision/virtual 
> instruction for schools
> Also Private training to your needs
> 907-444-3707
> Website with hundreds of informational articles & lessons on PC, Office 
> products, Mac, iPad/iTools and more, all done with keystrokes: 
> www.yourtechvision.com
>  
>  
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Editing problem, please please help!

[Matt Diemert]

personally, when I just want to delete audio and not move anything I use grid 
mode, F 4. just my prefered method of editing. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jul 18, 2016, at 4:07 PM, Jesse Kragiel  wrote:
> 
> When I edit a track, say a vocal, instead of just keeping everything in time, 
> time is deleted from the vocal. For instance, if I'm trimming the noise from 
> the beginning of the vocal, and select from the start of the song to the 
> start of the vocal and press delete, instead of just deleting all the data I 
> don't want, it actually is moving the vocal back to the beginning of the 
> song, making it out of sync with the music. It only does this in certain 
> files, and others work just fine. What could be the problem, and how do I fix 
> it? Thanks in advance for any help you can give.
> Jesse
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: changing nudge value and nudging in protools

[Matt Diemert]

Hello, the modifier to select is actually shift not control, so as far as that 
goes there is not a conflict. So shift tab and shift option tab. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jun 8, 2016, at 9:32 AM, 'Joy Bausch' via Pro Tools Accessibility 
>  wrote:
> 
> Hey Slau, 
> first of all, thanks for clarifying. Now, here's something I've been thinking 
> about, in regard to the shortcuts you mentioned:
> besides the ctrl-tab: select next region, there obviously also is: 
> ctrl-option-tab: select previous region. This shortcuts is not so usable for 
> us, since ctrl-option are the VoiceOver-keys. Here's the question: is it 
> possible to define which set of those keys are used for VO? In other words, 
> could one specify that only ctrl-option on the right side of spacebar act as 
> VO-keys?
> 
> Joy
>  
> 
> Von meinem iPhone gesendet
> 
>> Am 08.06.2016 um 14:59 schrieb Slau Halatyn :
>> 
>> Just two corrections to the previous message:
>> To cycle through  the nudge values, use Option-Command with the plus or 
>> minus keys on the num pad. Pressing the plus and minus keys alone (without 
>> any modifiers) will do one of two things: if a clip is selected, it'll nudge 
>> the clip and, if no clip is selected, it'll nudge the insertion point.
>> 
>> Also, Control-Tab is not the shortcut for moving to the previous clip 
>> boundary. Control-Tab will select the next clip. To move to the previous 
>> clip boundary, use Option-Tab. In this case, assuming you've just split the 
>> file and need to select to the previous boundary, you can add Shift to the 
>> Option-Tab and that will select to the previous boundary, thus selecting the 
>> clip.
>> HTH,
>> Slau
>> 
>>> On Jun 8, 2016, at 6:36 AM, Christopher-Mark Gilland 
>>>  wrote:
>>> 
>>> OK, Slau covered this about 2 weeks ago, as I had the same question.
>>>  
>>> Let me see if I can remember this.  This is actually good, as it'll 
>>> reenforce what he tought me.  Let's see what I retained.
>>>  
>>> First off, you need to set your nudge value.  To do this, use the numpad 
>>> plus and minus keys.  Plus will increase your nudge value, while minus will 
>>> obviously decrease it.
>>>  
>>> Another way you could do this, though not nearly as convenient is to go 
>>> into the edit window.  There should be a cluster in here you can interact 
>>> with then set it manually.  Again, that way probably isn't recommended 
>>> though, as it's just easier to use your plus and minus keys on your numpad. 
>>>  I did however want to point out that this is another method, just so you'd 
>>> know.
>>>  
>>> Once your nudge value is correctly set, you need to make the bit of audio 
>>> you wish to nudge into its own clip/region.  This is the part where I got 
>>> stuck before.  If you don't do this part, it won't work.
>>>  
>>> In your track list table, make sure that the tracks you want to be 
>>> menipulating through this nudge are selected, first and foremost.  Once 
>>> done, move to the beginning of the audio that you need to nudge.  Then, 
>>> press command+E to split the region at that point.
>>>  
>>> Now, move to the end point of the audio you need to nudge forward or 
>>> backward.  Then, do the same thing.  Press command+E again to split the 
>>> region.  So, basically, in a nutshell, what you've done up to this point is 
>>> you've split that area off into its own region, if that makes sense.  The 
>>> reason you did this twice is because you are isolating that area of audio 
>>> into its own section, if you will.  you had to make a boundery though.  
>>> This is why the first command+E split at the beginning of the audio to be 
>>> nudged.  The second command+E split again at the end of the audio.
>>>  
>>> The best way I could explain this is, think about having a sheet of paper 
>>> with a line drawn horizontally all the way across the sheet of paper.  
>>> Halfway across the paper, you have a small little circle.  You're wanting 
>>> to get that circle as a sheet of paper all by itself.  So, how would you do 
>>> that?  Well?  You'd have to cut with your scissors two times wouldn't you?  
>>> Once right on the left side of the circle, and again once right on the 
>>> right side of the circle.  That's essentially what you're doing here.  
>>> Think of the audio you're wanting to nudge as that little circle.  So you 
>>> have to split it on both sides.
>>>  
>>> Anyway, after you do the command+E to split at the end of the audio, you 
>>> now need to move to the previous region.  The reason is because right now, 
>>> you are positioned right at the end of the audio you want to nudge, most 
>>> likely.  therefore, you're out of bounds of that region we just isolated.  
>>> So, next, press ctrl+Tab.  This will move you to the previous region mark.  
>>> Now, what I! like to do, just to be on the safe side is, I like to move 
>>> just a tad into the actual region itself.  This way I know that I'm 

New song is in iTunes

[Matt Diemert]

For those who were interested here is the iTunes link to the new song. The 
final master sounds better imo than the mix i shared a few weeks ago. Enjoy. 
Closely I'll Follow - Single by Matthew Diemert
https://itun.es/us/Z68Zab


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



Sent from my iPhone

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Avid is a recipient of the 2016 Access Award from AFB

[Matt Diemert]

Excellent achievement, and well-deserved recognition! I have only used ProTools 
for about three years now, but I can say I have seen it considerable evolution 
in the accessibility and user experience  during this period
Sent from my iPhone

> On Feb 8, 2016, at 12:41 PM, Slau Halatyn  wrote:
> 
> I'm happy to say that it's now official: Avid is a recipient of the 2016 
> Access Award from AFB. Here's the press release:
> http://www.afb.org/info/about-us/press-room/press-release-archive/afb-announces-2016-access-award-winners/1245
> 
> Ed Gray will be in Arlington representing Avid and accepting the award on 
> behalf of the company.
> 
> Cheers,
> Slau
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Sharing a new song.

[Matt Diemert]

Sure thing  feel free. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Feb 2, 2016, at 3:04 PM, Ricky Prevatte <rickypreva...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Enjoyed that we might cover that tune in a  service. Like it that much would 
> that be OK?
> 
> Ricky Prevatte LMBT1154
> 
>> On Feb 2, 2016, at 9:10 AM, mcdiemert . <mcdiem...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> My wife and I wrote this last August, and Rob and I  recorded, and
>> mixed this month.   Will be in iTunes soon, but if anyone cares to
>> listen
>> http://www.noisetrade.com/matthewdiemert/closely-ill-follow
>> down on the heading that says sample before you download or something
>> to that affect.
>> Hope you enjoy.
>> 
>> -- 
>> Warm Regards:
>> Matt Diemert
>> 330-980-0046
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Digi 003

[Matt Diemert]

, The Mackie board does have fader flip, but when  flipped, they work the send 
levels.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Feb 2, 2016, at 10:36 AM, Ricky Prevatte  wrote:
> 
> Papa would a Mackie help you? You may be able to get rid of the O2 and 03 and 
> get a Mackie like I am doing and use your onyx board. I will keep you posted 
> but you may be like me if it is broke do not fix it. And as I have already 
> said my recording capabilities do not need repair Presonus rocks the house.
> 
> Ricky Prevatte LMBT1154
> 
>> On Feb 2, 2016, at 1:03 AM, Poppa Bear  wrote:
>> 
>> That X32 was the talk of the town in the blind community for a while, but I 
>> myself have a love hate relationship with Beranger and would rather not buy 
>> anymore gear from them, now if I find something in a pawn shop for pennies 
>> on the dollar I may toss it in the gear locker. At this point having an ADAT 
>> is an almost must have for any  interface that I consider. Well, thanks for 
>> the info, I will have to check out some sound demos on YouTube and see if I 
>> can get a feel for the overall sound quality. 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf 
>> Of TheOreoMonster
>> Sent: Monday, February 01, 2016 8:40 PM
>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
>> Subject: Re: Digi 003
>> 
>> Yeah it was down to the ONYX and A for me. I went with the A cuz its did 
>> 18 by 18 instead of the mackie which only  was 16  by 16. and actually the 
>> A can do 26 by 26 since it has a ADAT  as well.  The additional io/options 
>> to be used as a surface was was put it over the top for me.  Personally if i 
>> am gonna get a mixer i want it to bring its own analog flavor to the mix so 
>> to speak and i don’t want to have to memorize screens and pages of stuff to 
>> set things i just want knobs and buttons lol. Thats kind of why i haven’t 
>> gotten into the x32 craze. 
>>> On Feb 2, 2016, at 12:16 AM, Poppa Bear  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Sounds kind of like my Mackie Onyx board. I have both the Onyx, 003 and a 
>>> 002 sitting around, but I am still contemplating getting something else if 
>>> I could justify it. The thing with the 003 is that even though it is rock 
>>> solid on PT, it doesn't seem to be as user friendly on other daws, the 
>>> problem with the onyx is that it is not considered a full surface,. 
>>> 
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On 
>>> Behalf Of TheOreoMonster
>>> Sent: Monday, February 01, 2016 8:07 PM
>>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
>>> Subject: Re: Digi 003
>>> 
>>> It’s A so the are known for their mic press and the 4 band eq on th 
>>> board. The  converters seemed very nice in my experience.  Unlike the 
>>> Studio live from presounus its an analog mixer with the audio not going 
>>> digital till it hits the Firewire bus. The StudioLive is digital so it gets 
>>> converted to digit as soon as the signal hits the mic press. 
>>> some 
 On Feb 1, 2016, at 11:54 PM, Poppa Bear  wrote:
 
 What did that Allen and Heath run you? How are the built in pre's and the 
 conversion? 
 Thanks
 
 -Original Message-
 From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On 
 Behalf Of TheOreoMonster
 Sent: Monday, February 01, 2016 7:04 PM
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Subject: Re: Digi 003
 
 This is why i ended up going with the Allen & Heath Zed R16 mixer over the 
   Presounus. Its a mixer, interface and control surface all none. No 
 motorized faders but soft take over so things don’t just  jump when you 
 start moving faders.. 
 
 
> On Jan 31, 2016, at 9:20 AM, Ricky Prevatte  
> wrote:
> 
> I will try and work it out it is going to be a big opportunity to adapt 
> and change everything. Presonus Mike pres are wonderful but no 
> automation, no control surface overall and no plug in work. I will have 
> to adapt I can always use the mixer for live application and work out a 
> way to expand the studio when I track a bigger band.
> 
> Ricky Prevatte LMBT1154
> 
>> On Jan 30, 2016, at 2:28 PM, Poppa Bear  wrote:
>> 
>> I hope you can get it soarted out. I really enjoy mine. The pre's and 
>> the conversion aren’t to die for, but the SPDIF can solve any of those 
>> issues. They are typically a rock solid peace IMO and I haven't really 
>> came across anything over the last 4 or 5 years that is under 3 grand 
>> that I would trade up for and even then I would have to justify a larger 
>> surface with what my clients actually need. 
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On 
>> Behalf Of Ricky Prevatte
>> 

Re: Digi 003

[Matt Diemert]

Someone can correct me if I'm wrong, and actually I would love to be wrong, but 
as far as in ProTools with the controller, I am only able to manipulate 
plug-ins using the rotary pots.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Feb 1, 2016, at 6:36 PM, Ricky Prevatte <rickypreva...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> That is about what I would do with it. Except I wouldn't want it to move 
> parameters on an EQ I just like to have that Fater in my hand it is ear  to 
> hand type thing.
> 
> Ricky Prevatte LMBT1154
> 
>> On Feb 1, 2016, at 6:16 PM, Matt Diemert <mcdiem...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> I used a Maki extensively in the recording process, from arming tracks, to 
>> adjusting faders on the fly, to obviously being able to use punch mode, 
>> solos and mutes. As far as mixing goes I do use it a good bit but more so 
>> for creating a static mix, with volume faders and panning.  Obviously, it 
>> comes in handy when using automation! While  I have found it to work with 
>> the plug-ins, because it does not flip the faders, I typically use more of a 
>> keyboard approach to plug-ins.
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On Feb 1, 2016, at 5:37 PM, Ricky Prevatte <rickypreva...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I surely just almost bought one brand-new for about 600 more than you're 
>>> talking about at Sweetwater. I saw one for sale on Craigs list for 600 a 
>>> few weeks ago just missed it. I want something that will work with logic 
>>> and ProTools. What all are you doing with the unit Matt? How deep can you 
>>> go in ProTools for example EQ parameter availability and how much work with 
>>> the plug-ins will the Mackie do? My sales rep from Sweetwater and I agree 
>>> Mackie will be the best bet for me using both logic and ProTools. We may 
>>> not agree on where I should purchase one.
>>> 
>>> Ricky Prevatte LMBT1154
>>> 
>>>> On Feb 1, 2016, at 5:07 PM, Matt Diemert <mcdiem...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hello, you can probably find a Mackie universal pro controller on 
>>>> reverb.com for under $400.
>>>> I have used one of these for the past year or so and they work fairly well
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>> 
>>>>> On Feb 1, 2016, at 4:55 PM, Ricky Prevatte <rickypreva...@gmail.com> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Just no audio playback. The surface came up and it control pan, transport 
>>>>> and volume and other things. I did not do my research very well I thought 
>>>>> it would also control logic Pro X as well but it would not and that 
>>>>> played a great part in my returning the item. I still could not get any 
>>>>> audio playback from ProTools or logic Pro X as well. We thought it may be 
>>>>> a conflict with the Presonus drivers. I will have to find a dedicated 
>>>>> surface that will do both platforms. I am really happy about my Presonus 
>>>>> capabilities that was a hard thing to give up in the first place. I just 
>>>>> could not let something that worked go. Any suggestion on a control 
>>>>> surface would be appreciated?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Ricky Prevatte LMBT1154
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Feb 1, 2016, at 12:46 PM, Slau Halatyn <slauhala...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Just curious: did you install the 003 family driver? Was it an audio 
>>>>>> issue or the surface itself not coming up in the Hardware Setup dialog?
>>>>>> Slau
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Feb 1, 2016, at 12:38 PM, Ricky Prevatte <rickypreva...@gmail.com> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Digi going back to music go round. It is not going to work out for me, 
>>>>>>> will not do logic, cannot get it situated with ProTools no audio 
>>>>>>> playback or record for logic or ProTools.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Ricky Prevatte LMBT1154
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Jan 30, 2016, at 10:16 AM, TheOreoMonster 
>>>>>>>> <monkeypushe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> This is a question you should direct to Avid and or PreSounus Tech 
>>>>>>>> support.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Jan 30, 2016, at 9:11 AM, Ricky Prevatte <rickyp

Re: Digi 003

[Matt Diemert]

Hello, you can probably find a Mackie universal pro controller on reverb.com 
for under $400.
 I have used one of these for the past year or so and they work fairly well
Sent from my iPhone

> On Feb 1, 2016, at 4:55 PM, Ricky Prevatte  wrote:
> 
> Just no audio playback. The surface came up and it control pan, transport and 
> volume and other things. I did not do my research very well I thought it 
> would also control logic Pro X as well but it would not and that played a 
> great part in my returning the item. I still could not get any audio playback 
> from ProTools or logic Pro X as well. We thought it may be a conflict with 
> the Presonus drivers. I will have to find a dedicated surface that will do 
> both platforms. I am really happy about my Presonus capabilities that was a 
> hard thing to give up in the first place. I just could not let something that 
> worked go. Any suggestion on a control surface would be appreciated?
> 
> Ricky Prevatte LMBT1154
> 
>> On Feb 1, 2016, at 12:46 PM, Slau Halatyn  wrote:
>> 
>> Just curious: did you install the 003 family driver? Was it an audio issue 
>> or the surface itself not coming up in the Hardware Setup dialog?
>> Slau
>> 
>>> On Feb 1, 2016, at 12:38 PM, Ricky Prevatte  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Digi going back to music go round. It is not going to work out for me, will 
>>> not do logic, cannot get it situated with ProTools no audio playback or 
>>> record for logic or ProTools.
>>> 
>>> Ricky Prevatte LMBT1154
>>> 
 On Jan 30, 2016, at 10:16 AM, TheOreoMonster  
 wrote:
 
 This is a question you should direct to Avid and or PreSounus Tech support.
 
 
> On Jan 30, 2016, at 9:11 AM, Ricky Prevatte  
> wrote:
> 
> Well got me a new preowned Digi003.  I am having problems getting it 
> installed in protools 11.4  and logic pro x.  I think there is a conflict 
> with my presonus mixer drivers. so does any one know if the digi 
> and the presonus studio live mixer are going to stay in constant 
> conflict.  What I am asking is do all presonus drivers need to be 
> uninstalled for the digi  to run?  I know they will not work in tandom.  
> I need to know so I can make a judgementcall as to keep the digi  or send 
> it back.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Digi 003

[Matt Diemert]

I used a Maki extensively in the recording process, from arming tracks, to 
adjusting faders on the fly, to obviously being able to use punch mode, solos 
and mutes. As far as mixing goes I do use it a good bit but more so for 
creating a static mix, with volume faders and panning.  Obviously, it comes in 
handy when using automation! While  I have found it to work with the plug-ins, 
because it does not flip the faders, I typically use more of a keyboard 
approach to plug-ins.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Feb 1, 2016, at 5:37 PM, Ricky Prevatte <rickypreva...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I surely just almost bought one brand-new for about 600 more than you're 
> talking about at Sweetwater. I saw one for sale on Craigs list for 600 a few 
> weeks ago just missed it. I want something that will work with logic and 
> ProTools. What all are you doing with the unit Matt? How deep can you go in 
> ProTools for example EQ parameter availability and how much work with the 
> plug-ins will the Mackie do? My sales rep from Sweetwater and I agree Mackie 
> will be the best bet for me using both logic and ProTools. We may not agree 
> on where I should purchase one.
> 
> Ricky Prevatte LMBT1154
> 
>> On Feb 1, 2016, at 5:07 PM, Matt Diemert <mcdiem...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello, you can probably find a Mackie universal pro controller on reverb.com 
>> for under $400.
>> I have used one of these for the past year or so and they work fairly well
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On Feb 1, 2016, at 4:55 PM, Ricky Prevatte <rickypreva...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Just no audio playback. The surface came up and it control pan, transport 
>>> and volume and other things. I did not do my research very well I thought 
>>> it would also control logic Pro X as well but it would not and that played 
>>> a great part in my returning the item. I still could not get any audio 
>>> playback from ProTools or logic Pro X as well. We thought it may be a 
>>> conflict with the Presonus drivers. I will have to find a dedicated surface 
>>> that will do both platforms. I am really happy about my Presonus 
>>> capabilities that was a hard thing to give up in the first place. I just 
>>> could not let something that worked go. Any suggestion on a control surface 
>>> would be appreciated?
>>> 
>>> Ricky Prevatte LMBT1154
>>> 
>>>> On Feb 1, 2016, at 12:46 PM, Slau Halatyn <slauhala...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Just curious: did you install the 003 family driver? Was it an audio issue 
>>>> or the surface itself not coming up in the Hardware Setup dialog?
>>>> Slau
>>>> 
>>>>> On Feb 1, 2016, at 12:38 PM, Ricky Prevatte <rickypreva...@gmail.com> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Digi going back to music go round. It is not going to work out for me, 
>>>>> will not do logic, cannot get it situated with ProTools no audio playback 
>>>>> or record for logic or ProTools.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Ricky Prevatte LMBT1154
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Jan 30, 2016, at 10:16 AM, TheOreoMonster <monkeypushe...@gmail.com> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This is a question you should direct to Avid and or PreSounus Tech 
>>>>>> support.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Jan 30, 2016, at 9:11 AM, Ricky Prevatte <rickypreva...@gmail.com> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Well got me a new preowned Digi003.  I am having problems getting it 
>>>>>>> installed in protools 11.4  and logic pro x.  I think there is a 
>>>>>>> conflict with my presonus mixer drivers. so does any one know if 
>>>>>>> the digi 
>>>>>>> and the presonus studio live mixer are going to stay in constant 
>>>>>>> conflict.  What I am asking is do all presonus drivers need to be 
>>>>>>> uninstalled for the digi  to run?  I know they will not work in tandom. 
>>>>>>>  I need to know so I can make a judgementcall as to keep the digi  or 
>>>>>>> send it back.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>> Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>

Re: PT with speech tutorials

[Matt Diemert]

Hello, I would venture a guess that perhaps you did not install the air 
expansion pack that comes with ProTools 12? If not some of the instruments 
and/or plug-ins may not work. Feel free to write me off list if you have other 
questions, I have tested these tutorials and 910 11 and 12 and for the most 
part they all work fine.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Dec 25, 2015, at 1:00 PM, Andy B.  wrote:
> 
> I was attempting to go through the editing and mixing tutorial from 
> protoolswithspeech.com. Unfortunately, PT 12.4 and the version they use are 
> different so much so, that it is difficult to follow along. In fact, when I 
> load the sessions they provided to follow along with, the outs were 
> reassigned, the instrument tracks are broken, and a fair amount of the plugs 
> used either cost money, or don’t exist in my setup. Is there an easy way to 
> fix this problem?
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Waves and UAD Plug-in

[Matt Diemert]

The only other thing that I would say makes you a D plug-ins spectacular to me, 
is one of the presets are all in the standard ProTools presets drop down. 
Secondly every parameter in the UAD plug-in is numbered. This means if you're 
working with a plug that has 30 40 parameters and you need to get down to say 
number 30, you can quickly use the item chooser to type in the number of the 
parameter you need to move to.k these numbers seem to line up very well with my 
Maki control as well for what it's worth.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Sep 23, 2015, at 9:51 PM, James Lee <jameslee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks All. It's good to hear both of them are accessible.
> 
> JL
> 
>> On 9/22/2015 9:05 PM, TheOreoMonster wrote:
>> The plug ins in Pro Tools are accessible with UA but not much else  is. UA’s 
>> tech support is good about removing in and authorizing and setting up trials 
>> for you if you don’t have eyes around.   With something like move mouse or 
>> better yet keyboard metro you could probably get some scripts going for the 
>> console and etc though. Think someone did a set but i haven’t gotten a 
>> chance to play with that myself yet.
>> 
>>> On Sep 22, 2015, at 3:32 PM, Nickus de Vos <bigboy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi
>>> Matt, how is the UAD application windows? Also accessible?
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>>> On 22 Sep 2015, at 19:27, Matt Diemert <mcdiem...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Personally, I'm a much bigger fan of the UAD plug-ins! Sound wise I think 
>>>> they sound better. From an excess ability standpoint, the layout of the U 
>>>> a D plugs trumps many plugs that I've ever worked with.
>>>> 
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>> 
>>>>> On Sep 22, 2015, at 1:06 PM, Poppa Bear <heavens4r...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> The waves stuff shows up in the Pro tools plug-in windows and you can 
>>>>> change the parameters. The preset lists on the other hand will have to be 
>>>>> downloaded from somebody around here or put together with sighted help. 
>>>>> The waves presets are in the waves gie and need to be saved into the pro 
>>>>> tools preset list in order to be able to scroll through them.
>>>>> HTH
>>>>> 
>>>>> -Original Message-
>>>>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On 
>>>>> Behalf Of James Lee
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 5:57 AM
>>>>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
>>>>> Subject: Waves and UAD Plugins
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I know few people here are using Waves and UAD, and they also created
>>>>> presets for them. Having said that, how accessible are they with 
>>>>> Voiceover?
>>>>> Do parameters show up on the plugin window, or do you need to use
>>>>> control surface and memorize knobs order for each plugin?
>>>>> Thinking about getting UAD analog classics Plus or Waves ssl.
>>>>> Any other suggestion?
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> 
>>>>> JL
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Waves and UAD Plug-in

[Matt Diemert]

Hello, I don't have an Apollo, but I have a satellite to Duo So I can run all 
of the latest plugs. They are excellent and extremely accessible!

Sent from my iPhone

> On Sep 22, 2015, at 3:00 PM, Poppa Bear <heavens4r...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hey Matt, you are talking about the UA Apollo Plug ins right? I have been 
> meaning to get down to my churches PT set up and check them out. 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf 
> Of Matt Diemert
> Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 9:27 AM
> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: Waves and UAD Plug-in
> 
> Personally, I'm a much bigger fan of the UAD plug-ins! Sound wise I think 
> they sound better. From an excess ability standpoint, the layout of the U a D 
> plugs trumps many plugs that I've ever worked with.
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Sep 22, 2015, at 1:06 PM, Poppa Bear <heavens4r...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> The waves stuff shows up in the Pro tools plug-in windows and you can change 
>> the parameters. The preset lists on the other hand will have to be 
>> downloaded from somebody around here or put together with sighted help. The 
>> waves presets are in the waves gie and need to be saved into the pro tools 
>> preset list in order to be able to scroll through them.
>> HTH
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On 
>> Behalf Of James Lee
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 5:57 AM
>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
>> Subject: Waves and UAD Plugins
>> 
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> I know few people here are using Waves and UAD, and they also created 
>> presets for them. Having said that, how accessible are they with Voiceover?
>> Do parameters show up on the plugin window, or do you need to use 
>> control surface and memorize knobs order for each plugin?
>> Thinking about getting UAD analog classics Plus or Waves ssl.
>> Any other suggestion?
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> JL
>> 
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> 
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Waves and UAD Plug-in

[Matt Diemert]

Personally, I'm a much bigger fan of the UAD plug-ins! Sound wise I think they 
sound better. From an excess ability standpoint, the layout of the U a D plugs 
trumps many plugs that I've ever worked with.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Sep 22, 2015, at 1:06 PM, Poppa Bear  wrote:
> 
> The waves stuff shows up in the Pro tools plug-in windows and you can change 
> the parameters. The preset lists on the other hand will have to be downloaded 
> from somebody around here or put together with sighted help. The waves 
> presets are in the waves gie and need to be saved into the pro tools preset 
> list in order to be able to scroll through them.
> HTH
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf 
> Of James Lee
> Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 5:57 AM
> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Waves and UAD Plugins
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I know few people here are using Waves and UAD, and they also created 
> presets for them. Having said that, how accessible are they with Voiceover?
> Do parameters show up on the plugin window, or do you need to use 
> control surface and memorize knobs order for each plugin?
> Thinking about getting UAD analog classics Plus or Waves ssl.
> Any other suggestion?
> Thanks,
> 
> JL
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Very very! helpful discovery in ProTools 12.2.

[Matt Diemert]

Hello, option K toggles in put only monitoring.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Sep 3, 2015, at 8:17 PM, Slau Halatyn  wrote:
> 
> Command-i brings up the Session Info window. I've never known there to be a 
> shortcut for it but maybe there is one.
> 
> Slau
> 
>> On Sep 3, 2015, at 7:26 PM, Poppa Bear  wrote:
>> 
>> I thought it was always there by pressing command and the letter “I: to turn 
>> input monitoring on or off.
>>  
>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] 
>> Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2015 3:17 AM
>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
>> Subject: Re: Very very! helpful discovery in ProTools 12.2.
>>  
>> Think that's always been there mate, but thanks for sharing. 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> On 2 Sep 2015, at 21:47, Christopher-Mark Gilland  
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Slau didn't cover this in his recording, but I found something really really 
>> really nice!  Maybe it's been there all along, but I never have seen it 
>> prior to this version.  I interacted with a track in a session I am working 
>> on.  I noticed that just before the record enable arm button, there is now a 
>> button which says track input monitor.  Oh my God that is nice!  The thing 
>> is, I don't always want to have a track armed just to be able to hear it.  
>> the other thing too I've found is, if a track is armed, as soon as you hit  
>> the space bar to start playing, that track then would no longer be heard 
>> through the monitor until I stopped playback.  The only way around that was 
>> to arm the track, then instead of hitting play, I'd have to hit record, 
>> which of corse is definitely! not a good thing.  The fact that now arm and 
>> monitor input are separated is incredible!
>>  
>> Just a little thing I thought I'd share with you guys.
>>  
>> Chris.
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email toptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email toptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: confirmed plug-in automation issue

[Matt Diemert]

Good morning, I will definitely check on this today! We had a few sections that 
we tracked for our tutorials that we actually omitted in the final product, and 
I believe this was one of them! Again, I will also go check on my machine 
running ProTools 10 today. Let you know this afternoon.

Sent from my iPhone

 On Aug 28, 2015, at 10:51 AM, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Hi Matt,
 
 It would be helpful to know whether it was truly working or whether it was 
 volume or pan automation that worked. Let me know.
 
 Slau
 
 On Aug 28, 2015, at 10:28 AM, Martin (Punky) Sopart m...@cakewalker.de 
 wrote:
 
 Matt!
 
 During your tutorials I think you only automated a fade by using the volume 
 slider inside the master fader.
 
 Best! / Martin
 -Original Message-
 From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com]
 On Behalf Of Matt Diemert
 Sent: Friday, August 28, 2015 4:18 PM
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Subject: Re: confirmed plug-in automation issue
 
 Actually, I believe in ProTools 10.0 it was possible to automate plug-ins 
 from
 the keyboard. I vaguely remember doing a bid on it during the creation
 process of our tutorials, and I think we decided against it for one reason 
 or
 another but I'm going to see if I can track down the audio and listen to it 
 to
 see if it worked. I also have an old machine around here that still has 10 
 on it
 maybe I will fire it up when I get home tonight and just make sure that I'm
 right.
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
 On Aug 28, 2015, at 9:54 AM, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 I just got into the studio and confirmed the issue with trying to write
 automation using only VoiceOver. Over the years where we've had no less
 than 10 VoiceOver users beta test Pro Tools, not once has anybody reported
 this issue. That, of course, is not surprising since most of the users have
 control surfaces and would never dream of writing automation using only
 VoiceOver. Those testers without a surface clearly never got around to
 testing this specific aspect. From an accessibility standpoint, the 
 knee-jerk
 reaction is to look at things that are unlabeled or invisible, etc. 
 Functionality
 such as this is taking it a step further and so it's not inconceivable how 
 this
 could be the case. I've confirmed the behavior in both version 11 and 12 
 and I
 doubt it was any different going back to version 8.
 
 Anyway, as I said earlier, this won't get fixed in the upcoming release 
 but I'll
 submit a bug report for the future.
 
 Slau
 
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: entering in tempo values

[Matt Diemert]

Chad, did you turn off the conductor track? Also if you hit voiceover shift 
space perhaps try heading back space a few times first and then typing and 130. 
See if that helps at all

Sent from my iPhone

 On Aug 28, 2015, at 11:29 AM, Chad Baker baker420c...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 hi i am having a heck of a time trying to enter in a tempo value
 i want 130 and its at 120
 i clicked in the edit field and typed 130 and enter and it put 120.1300
 i did vo shift space on the tempo field
 any suggestions to try 
 thanks
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Cannot start recording by pressing CMD + spacebar in PT 11

[Matt Diemert]

I have found that if I do not delete  the i'll, and empty the trash, it does 
not work. So backing it up and have actually been a mistake because the file 
does get regenerated want to reboot your computer.

Sent from my iPhone

 On Aug 26, 2015, at 12:07 PM, Robin Kipp mli...@robin-kipp.net wrote:
 
 Hi,
 thanks for pointing me in the right direction! After some Googling, I found 
 various posts by people having the exact same problem, however most of them 
 are quite dated (2007 and earlier). I found the tip about removing 
 ~/Library/Preferences/com.apple.symbolichotkeys.plist so I backed up the file 
 and then removed it from that folder. Unfortunately, however, this didn’t 
 actually solve the problem for me… I tried rebooting, then creating a new 
 session but without any luck… So, in case you do have any more details or an 
 article that you could share I definitely would greatly appreciate that!
 All the best,
 Robin
 Am 26.08.2015 um 15:46 schrieb mcdiemert . mcdiem...@gmail.com:
 
 I've had this happen to me at times when I switch keyboards, or use a
 wireless/Bluetooth KB.
 There is a symbolic hotkeys files that needs deleted and preferences
 as far as spot light need reset. I'll try to dig the article up if I
 can when I'm back today, but if you google the issue it should pop up.
 
 
 On 8/26/15, Robin Kipp mli...@robin-kipp.net wrote:
 Hi Peter,
 I’m on a 2013 Mac Pro using a Bluetooth keyboard.
 HTH and thanks for the response!
 Robin
 
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 
 -- 
 Warm Regards:
 Matt Diemert
 330-980-0046
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Auto tune 8 or auto tune efx with BO?

[Matt Diemert]

Good morning, the Melda plugs work pretty well, but there nothing super Duper! 
I have used their tuning plug-in a few times and it helped, but not nearly as 
flexible as auto tune.

Sent from my iPhone

 On Aug 7, 2015, at 7:36 AM, Christopher-Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 
 Yes.  E F X is accessible.  I used to use it before upgrading to 8.1 Native.  
 It works perfectly.  I upgraded as I needed a bit more flexability, but 
 accessibility alone wasn't an issue at all.
  
 Chris.
  
 - Original Message -
 From: Shawn Brock
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Friday, August 07, 2015 7:32 AM
 Subject: Re: Auto tune 8 or auto tune efx with BO?
 
 Hi Slau, 
 
 Thanks very much for the feedback. I think I will download a demo of each, 
 and report back to the list my findings. 
 
 Not to hijack my own thread, but another project I have is to download the 
 collection of 24 free plugins from Melda Production. They also have a vocal 
 tuning plugin as part of that offering. Anyone tried this suite? 
 
 http://www.meldaproduction.com/plugins/product.php?id=MFreeEffectsBundle 
 

 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
 On Aug 6, 2015, at 6:59 PM, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Hi Shawn,
 
 I'm not sure if the EFX version is accessible. I'd imagine that it is but, 
 then again, that's just an educated guess. AutoTune 8 is certainly 
 accessible and works well.
 
 Slau
 
 On Aug 6, 2015, at 6:49 PM, Shawn Brock sh...@shawnbrock.com wrote:
 
 Hi all,
 I have a gig recording vocals for a client. Being that I just got going in 
 PT two months ago, I haven't built up a plethora of AX plugs, and Auto Tune 
 is a must have for some folks. Just wondering if it is worth shelling out 
 the extra cash on 8, or if  EFX would offer the same access with VO? It 
 seems that EFX just don't have graphical tuning node, which I would guess 
 we can't use anyhow... And yes I know, I could just doqnload the demos and 
 see for myself, but I had some hope that some of you would be willing to 
 share your experiences... I could always fire up my Windows computer for 
 this session, but I would rather just have those days behind me...
 Thanks,
 Shawn   will   
 Sent from my iPhone
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Sliding by Milla Seconds

[Matt Diemert]

I am in ProTools 11, so from the edit window, I use the item chooser and find 
the nudge button. Then I voiceover space on that button and type in the value I 
want for example zero. Zero. 10.

Sent from my iPhone

 On Jun 2, 2015, at 5:12 PM, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Sorry, where do you change the nudge values?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf 
 Of mcdiemert .
 Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 11:40 AM
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Subject: Re: Sliding by Milla Seconds
 
 If you had a stereo track, using the context menu shift VO M you could  split 
 to mono. If it's a mono track already, using the same menu duplicate the 
 track. Then make a selection of the second track, several ways you could do 
 that I'd probably start at the first region,  and use shift option return to 
 select to the end. Set your nudge value to your desired value, and press 
 minus to move it back in time.
 These are the short and sweet directions. If this doesn't make sense please 
 say so, and I'll try to be more clear.
 
 HTH.
 
 
 On 6/2/15, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:
 If I want to split an say acoustic guitar track into two monos and 
 slide one track back say 10 milla seconds, then what is the best way 
 to go in PT? I don't want to use a plug because I want to save a few 
 processor punches for bigger plugin needs.
 
 Thanks
 
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
 Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
 an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 
 --
 Warm Regards:
 Matt Diemert
 330-980-0046
 
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Fade out for a clip

[Matt Diemert]

Hello, if you have your selection made, why not try option G for fade out.  
Then, if you wish to change the shape of the fade you can use command F.

Sent from my iPhone

 On May 6, 2015, at 11:40 AM, John André Lium-Netland eml...@a-pro-studio.no 
 wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 I would like to create a fade-out for a clip/region, but when I use the 
 Create Fade dialog (command-F), I’m only able to create fade-ins. It seems 
 like the settings I’m able to do with VoiceOver is not changing the type of 
 fade from a fade-in to a fade-out. Anyone had any experience with this?
 
 Best,
 John André
 
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: pt ran out of cpu power

[Matt Diemert]

Steve, what do you have your buffer size set to? If it's lower, consider 
switching to 1024.

Sent from my iPhone

 On Apr 30, 2015, at 6:40 PM, Steve Sparrow i...@sparrowsound.com.au wrote:
 
 Hi anyone seen this.
 when trying to bounce to disk in real time in p t 11.31 i’m getting the 
 following error message.
 protools ran out of cpu power try reactivating plugins or removing native 
 plugins. aae 9173.
 i’d be happy to uninstall my plugs and reinstall if need be. How ever 
 everything is  running fine apart from when i try to bounce in real time to 
 disk. No problem if i enable off line bounce,or what ever it’s called.
 Any thoughts.
 Steve
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Stereo Wideners

[Matt Diemert]

BX solo is a free plug-in from plug-in alliance, it is a very nice widener. In 
fact I can't recommend enough the plug-ins from plug-in alliance. Recently have 
started using the SPL ranger EQ, and the mag EQ! Wonderful and accessible

Sent from my iPhone

 On Apr 12, 2015, at 3:06 PM, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Hi JPR,
 
 I'm sure their plug-ins are great. They're simply cumbersome for a VoiceOver 
 user. Further, their installer is absolutely inaccessible. The stuff is 
 visually pretty dated and I'm sure it's all authored on the Windows side of 
 things. Still, at least they do offer a free bundle as well as their very 
 affordable offerings. I'll probably check out a few more of their plug-ins 
 eventually.
 
 Best,
 
 Slau
 
 On Apr 12, 2015, at 12:45 PM, Jean-Philippe Rykiel jpryk...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 
 Dear Slau.
 there are all like this, because most of the parameters concern Melda's very 
 versatile modulation matrix. They  have all kinds of internalLFOs, envelope 
 followers, step sequencers and so on. Of course, you don't have to use 
 these. But the problem is these parameters layout. The developer explained 
 me that he could not change it  anymore for backward compatibility 
 reasons,so the parameters come in an order I can only describe as a good 
 idea at a time.
 Nevertheless, they are  great and cheap.
 Best,
 JPR
 
 http://www.jprykiel.com
 http://soundcloud.com/ryksounet
 http://twitter.com/ryksounet
 http://facebook.com/jeanphilipperykiel
 
 Le 12/04/2015 18:34, Slau Halatyn a écrit :
 Melda is certainly one of the most prolific plug-in developers but, I have 
 to say, it's overwhelming how many parameters they manage to pack into a 
 plug-in. I think their basic flanger has something like 90 parameters and 
 one of their synths has something like 400 parameters. I'm sure it's great 
 stuff but it's really quite cluttered. That said, I've only taken a look at 
 about 3 of their playg-ins. Maybe the rest aren't quite as jammed.
 
 Slau
 
 On Apr 12, 2015, at 11:58 AM, Chris Smart csma...@cogeco.ca wrote:
 
 thanks
 At 11:43 AM 4/12/2015, you wrote:
 dear Chris,
 Melda productions has amazing and very affordable stuff, some parts of 
 their plug-ins are not accessible but many parameters can be used via 
 your DAW's automation.
 http://www.meldaproduction.com/download.php
 have a look. Among these are stereo enhancers, equalisers, vocoders, and 
 weirder things.
 Enjoy,
 JPR
 
 http://www.jprykiel.com
 http://soundcloud.com/ryksounet
 http://twitter.com/ryksounet
 http://facebook.com/jeanphilipperykiel
 
 Le 12/04/2015 17:31, Chris Smart a écrit :
 Can anyone recommend a stereo widener that doesn't cause lots of phasing 
 problems or ruin things when the mix is collapsed to mono?
 
 I have Waves S1 here and an older version of iZotope Ozone but am 
 looking for other suggestions to try.
 
 thanks
 Chris
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: stereo track question

[Matt Diemert]

From the tracklist table, if you select the track you should be able to press 
voiceover shift M  and in the same context menu where you could rename a track 
 you should see the option to split to mono.

Sent from my iPhone

 On Apr 3, 2015, at 6:55 AM, Steve Sparrow i...@sparrowsound.com.au wrote:
 
 Hi. yes there is. I had to google this the other day. But have not tried to 
 do it as yet. Apparently, when you are in the track list, i think you have to 
 select the track, then there is a drop down menu, hopefully v o m will bring 
 up the appropriate menue. there is supposed to be an option in there called 
 split to tracks. This creates two extra tracks from the stereo track. so you 
 can then delete the one you don’t want, if need be.
 
 As i say. this came from the knowledge base on the avid web site. So you may 
 need to google this issue to get the full deal. But from what i can see it’s 
 basically doable.
 h t h.
 Steve
 
 On 3 Apr 2015, at 5:48 am, Brian Howerton bshowert...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Hello all,
 If a track was imported as a stereo track, is there a way in PT to split the 
 left and right tracks of the stereo track in to two mono tracks?  Thanks,
 Brian
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Having a bit of an issue with Ezdrummer2 for the Mac demo version

[Matt Diemert]

Addictive drums too can be used as a plug-in in ProTools 11 though it is an 
accessible. 

Sent from my iPhone

 On Apr 2, 2015, at 5:43 AM, Scott Chesworth scottcheswo...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 That's disappointing news. There's a basic level of usability under
 Windows in standalone and as a VSTI, shame it doesn't appear to have
 made it across to the Mac version. Keep us posted if you find a fix.
 
 Scott
 
 On 4/2/15, Krister Ekstrom kris...@kristersplace.com wrote:
 Hi there,
 I'm trying to test the EZDrummer 2 for the Mac, the demo version to see how
 it sounds, because i was under the impression and correct me if i'm wrong
 please, that Addictive drums 2 could not be used at all even as a plugin
 under Pro tools 11. I have installed EZDrummer and when i open the app in
 stand-alone mode all i get is busy busy, now i don't expect EzDrummer to
 work or rather to be accessible in stand-alone mode, but here's the thing,
 when i open it as a plugin under Protools 11.3 Protools crashes and opens
 the crash reporter. Anyone have had this happen or am i missing something?
 /Krister
 
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: problem deleting selection

[Matt Diemert]

Hello, I doubt having a demonstration copy install is your issue here. When I 
first started with ProTools it was as a demo and I don't recall us ever being a 
problem. If you're using ProTools 11, unselect every track in the project, 
using voice over . Then reselect only the track that you wish to delete 
material from. The fact that you can delete audio using the tutorials just 
makes me there is just a selection problem going on here. Feel free to write me 
privately and perhaps I can give you a step-by-step

Sent from my iPhone

 On Apr 1, 2015, at 4:13 PM, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Tom, that could be it, many demos have restrictions and that may be one. 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf 
 Of Tom Hessels
 Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2015 11:43 AM
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Subject: RE: problem deleting selection
 
 A strange thougt but good it be the 30-days trial I'm using?
 I searched on the Avid website but good not find any restrictions of the demo.
 
 Tom.
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf 
 Of Tom Hessels
 Sent: woensdag 1 april 2015 21:34
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Subject: RE: problem deleting selection
 
 Hi Poppa,
 Yes I selected the track.
 I tried what you suggested but this also didn't work.
 I think I had to start reading all the documentation.
 It's always difficult to change from one program to another.
 I've worked with cakewalk sonar for years and then you think that migrating 
 Can't be so difficult. Stupid thought...
 But I will still give it a try. I was very impressed by the possibility to 
 make my own sounds in Ultra analog from Applied acoustics.
 In the older days on winxp when using directixer this was also possible 
 within sonar. But now you can only do this in sonar using synth rack view. 
 And thas is very, very lot of work.
 
 Tom.
 
 
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf 
 Of Poppa Bear
 Sent: woensdag 1 april 2015 21:00
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Subject: RE: problem deleting selection
 
 Sorry to ask such a basic question Tom, but you are making sure that the 
 track you want to edit is selected? Let me ask you this, maybe create a new 
 track with audio on it, go to a section of the track, press the down arrow 
 and then press Shift, option, Delete at once and then the delete key and see 
 if it clears the section from the place you pressed the down arrow to the end 
 of the song. 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf 
 Of Tom Hessels
 Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2015 10:49 AM
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Subject: RE: problem deleting selection
 
 Hi Slau,
 It still doesn't work.
 It becomes a bit confusing for me.
 I loaded the session that the protools with speech boys provides with the 
 edit tutorial.
 When I make a selection in one of the tracks of this session and delete it it 
 works fine. But when I add a new track and record something on it and then 
 make a selection and try to delete it it doesn't work.
 I explore botgh tracks but can't find any difference.
 Do you understand whats's happening here?
 
 Tom.
 
 
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf 
 Of Slau Halatyn
 Sent: zondag 29 maart 2015 16:42
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Subject: Re: problem deleting selection
 
 Hi tom,
 
 One of two things might be happening:
 1. Make sure you have track and edit selections linked as well as the edit 
 and timeline linked. this is under the Options menu. It sounds like you might 
 not actually have the track selected and/or the edit selection is not 
 actually linked to the timeline.
 2. You might not have waveforms being displayed. Make sure you see the word 
 waveform in the track view of the Edit window.
 
 Check those things for now.
 
 HTH,
 
 Slau
 
 On Mar 29, 2015, at 2:07 PM, Tom Hessels li...@bloemsels.nl wrote:
 
 Hi,
 I’m migrating from Sonar to Pro tools and that results in a lot of dumb 
 questions.
 I.ve already learned a lot from podcasts from Kevin and pt with speech.
 But there’s still a problem with deleting a selection.
 I’m selecting a peace of audio using the up and down arrow keys.
 When pressing the spacebar I hear the selection. But when I press the 
 backspace nothing happens accept when hitting the spacebar I hear the audio 
 from start point of selection to the end of the track.
 What am I missing?
 Tom.
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 -- 
 You received this 

Re: Control surface help

[Matt Diemert]

David,, if you can get your hands on an alpha track, that would meet yourneeds. 
It has the ability to control plugs. 

Sent from my iPhone

 On Feb 13, 2015, at 10:21 PM, David Eagle onlineea...@googlemail.com wrote:
 
 Alas you can not. Perhaps if the plugin parameters could be controlled by 
 midi values then plugins might be controllable - I don’t know. I have a 
 Beringer BCF2000 which I think works with ProTools under the HUI mode. I 
 think this also allows me to control send faders as well as track and 
 busfaders. At least that’s a start, but I could buy Reaper for £60 and 
 control anything I wanted with midi. 
 
 OK, I’ll stop moaning. I’ve been suckered into using ProTools - it’s 
 extremely accessible - and so I’ll just have to put up with its idiosyncratic 
 quirks, which, let’s face it, are driven by making money through forcing you 
 to buy proprietary software. The Avid Artist control surfaces, which allow 
 you to control plugins, cost over £1000. Not sure I’m going to earn enough 
 from audio to justify that. 
 
 
 
 
 
 On 14 Feb 2015, at 02:26, Ricky Prevatte rickypreva...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 I truly do not know have not tried. Fact is I haven't used it that much I am 
 getting ready to. Eat Q is not something I'm going to be doing with the 
 control surface.
 
 Ricky Prevatte LMBT1154
 
 On Feb 13, 2015, at 8:54 PM, David Eagle onlineea...@googlemail.com wrote:
 
 Thanks for that Ricky. I’ve had a look on the Internet. I assume that you 
 can’t control plugin parameters with this? It seems as if this is the case 
 for surfaces that run in HUI mode. Does the Faderport allow you to change 
 EQ settings for instance, or is it just track volume and pan?
 
 Thanks.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Virtual instrument issue.

[Matt Diemert]

Kevin, it responds if the pedal is just permanently held down.but otherwise 
it's almost like every hit comes down perfectly on the click with no sustain 
whatsoever.

Sent from my iPhone

 On Jan 30, 2015, at 9:23 AM, Kevin Reeves reeves...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 When you hold the petal down and play the session, is the track properly 
 responding to all the petal up and down events, or does it now behave like 
 the petal is permanently being held down?
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Virtual instrument issue.

[Matt Diemert]

Good morning, even with midi merge set to off the problem persists. The only 
way that the piano sounds normal, is if the track is armed and I'm holding down 
the sustain pedal.i've tracked virtual piano several times without this 
happening though it has happened to me once before and I scrapped the idea. I'm 
just wondering if there's anyway for me to bounce the midi to an audio track so 
that at least I have the normal sounding piano.any thoughts would be 
appreciated.

Sent from my iPhone

 On Jan 29, 2015, at 8:10 PM, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Hi Matt,
 
 This is a known and quite infamous bug that has been in Pro Tools since, wait 
 for it, version 7. Yes, that's right. I truly have no idea why this bug still 
 hasn't been squashed. Anyway, don't hold your breath but here's a work-around:
 
 Don't use MIDI Merge. That kind of sucks for those who like to use that mode 
 but, hey, you can always just use regular punch-in recording and you'll 
 pretty much get the same results for piano/keyboard playing.
 
 Hope that helps,
 
 Slau
 
 On Jan 29, 2015, at 6:53 PM, mcdiemert . mcdiem...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Hi all,
 wondering if anyone has seen this behavior. In both PT 10 and 11, I
 create a virtual instrument track, and instantiate the mini grand
 plugin.  I arm the track, and record a pass and when I play it back,
 it was as if I didn't use the sustain pedal. However, if I press play
 while holding the sustain pedal and continue doing so as the pass
 plays,  the piano sounds fine. I've tested with an m audio 61 USB,  as
 well as an older clavenova with midi out.
 Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
 
 -- 
 Warm Regards:
 Matt Diemert
 330-980-0046
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Virtual instrument issue.

[Matt Diemert]

Same behavior! Interestingly enough, I opened a project from July with many 
grand instantiated, and played it back and it plays back perfectly fine it's 
about six minutes of piano

Sent from my iPhone

 On Jan 30, 2015, at 9:12 AM, Kevin Reeves reeves...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 I think this is a bug in Mini Grand, oddly enough.
 Try instantiating Xpand 2 and pick one of their pianos. Not as good, but 
 still worth the test. See if the same thing happens.
 
 Kevin
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Virtual instrument issue.

[Matt Diemert]

I'll give that a look when I get back home this afternoon. Thanks so much for 
all the help.

Sent from my iPhone

 On Jan 30, 2015, at 9:40 AM, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Matt,
 
 Have you looked at the track to see how the controller #64 data has been 
 captured? I'm not sure what's been recorded/captured via MIDI but, if holding 
 down the pedal yields the desired result, insert a controller #64 event On at 
 the beginning of the piece and see if that duplicates the effect.
 
 Slau
 
 On Jan 30, 2015, at 9:24 AM, Matt Diemert mcdiem...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Kevin, it responds if the pedal is just permanently held down.but otherwise 
 it's almost like every hit comes down perfectly on the click with no sustain 
 whatsoever.
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
 On Jan 30, 2015, at 9:23 AM, Kevin Reeves reeves...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 When you hold the petal down and play the session, is the track properly 
 responding to all the petal up and down events, or does it now behave like 
 the petal is permanently being held down?
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Numb pad is still down

[Matt Diemert]

I have used a Logitech wireless keyboard with ProTools for the past two years 
with no problems whatsoever! It is USB over infrared.and this sounds like 
exactly what Papa is using.

Sent from my iPhone

 On Jan 7, 2015, at 8:03 AM, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 OK, that's confusing. If it's wireless, how is it USB? Is it one of those USB 
 plug-in dongles that transmits a BlueTooth signal? At any rate, the problem 
 clearly isn't with Pro Tools. You need to grab an Apple Pro keyboard for 
 around $40. If you're determined to be wireless, use the Apple wireless 
 keyboard with one of the wireless num pads from Belkin or anything that Apple 
 sells in the Apple Store online. Those two solutions work with no problems.
 
 HTH,
 
 Slau
 
 On Jan 6, 2015, at 11:14 PM, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Hello Slau, it is a wireless USB keyboard with built in NUMB pad. The Num 
 pad commander works, but none of the normal num pad keystrokes work what so 
 ever, not even entering in values.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf 
 Of Slau Halatyn
 Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 2:36 PM
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Subject: Re: Numb pad is still down
 
 Papa,
 
 It sounds like there's a system level problem with your num pad. There are 
 no commands to turn off the num pad in Pro Tools. It's either classic, 
 Transport or Shuttle (on HD systems). Apart from that, num lock and num pad 
 commander are the only other variables. Does num pad commander work 
 correctly? Can you enter values from the num pad? Can you enter counter 
 values? are you using an extended keyboard or is it a separate num pad? USB? 
 BlueTooth?
 
 Slau
 
 On Jan 6, 2015, at 5:44 PM, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 I’ve taken a break for a few days in the studio, but my numb pad PT 
 commands are still not working. Rew, FWD, record, marker, nudge, metronome, 
 none of these functions will work from the numb pad. I can flip on and off 
 the numb pad commander, I can turn numb lock on and off, but I cannot use 
 any PT commands with it. Any more thoughts would be great.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Protools 11

[Matt Diemert]

Good morning, as far as plug-ins are concerned, the stock  plug-ins
 Included with ProTools work very well with voiceover. Also many third-party 
plug-ins are accessible in ProTools 11. As far as installation goes, you will 
need sighted assistance when using the Ilok manager. 
Sent from my iPhone

 On Jan 4, 2015, at 9:29 AM, Christian christia...@runbox.com wrote:
 
 Hi folks,
 OK, so now I got the Ilok and ready to install Protools trial later today. 
 Was just wondering how it is with he effects, will I be able to access them?
 I read somewhere that there could be problems with that.
 And also, will I need sighted assistance with activating Protools or how is 
 it with the Ilok system?
 Many thanks!
 Christian
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Christmas tune

[Matt Diemert]

Definitely enjoyed both songs. Was that a real her Monica on the Christmas 
song, or was it a virtual instrument?

Sent from my iPhone

 On Dec 24, 2014, at 5:49 AM, Nick Gawronski n...@nickgawronski.com wrote:
 
 Hi, I did enjoy both songs.  Did you do all parts of these songs? Nick 
 Gawronski
 On 12/23/2014 6:33 PM, Rui Vilarinho wrote:
 hmm... since nobody liked the cover , i picked the guitar and bang bang, I 
 recorded another one,a Xmas tune though!
 Merry Xmas guys ...  grin .
 https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/16775692/FelizNatal%2CRuiVilarinho.mp3 
 
 Rui Vilarinho
 
 - Original Message - From: Rui Vilarinho ruia...@hotmail.com
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2014 11:23 PM
 Subject: Re: Christmas tune
 
 
 Hi guys, so... it's  Xmas season, and a new year is right on the corner 
 right?!
 I hope you have great time with your loving ones.
 Slau, greatXmas tune! thanks for sharing.
 hmm...Chris... after reading your mail I was expecting a song a lot worse! 
 probably you just need to find your confort zone, wherever that means! grin 
 .
 I dont have any Xmas song but I have one that I made weeks ago that at 
 least talks about clouds, butterflys, fairlytails  and so on ... Well, I 
 cant remember if I already shared the folowing cover, anyway I share here 
 with you guys, hope you like it!
 
 https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/16775692/LittleWing-RuiVilarinho.mp3
 
 All good,
 Rui Vilarinho
 
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: cannot delete audio

[Matt Diemert]

I have seen this happen quite often and ProTools version 11. It does not happen 
at all and 10, and if I have multiple tracks in a project more than five or 
six, it typically behaves as expected. My workaround is exactly what David has 
described here.

Sent from my iPhone

 On Dec 4, 2014, at 11:38 AM, David Eagle onlineea...@googlemail.com wrote:
 
 Just to correct my last message. I seemingly have to navigate to the track 
 below the one I want to change, and hit control and P. Then the track above 
 will delete. I’m only working with one audio track in my files at the moment. 
 I have three tracks in my project. A blank audio track, a master fader track, 
 and a track with some audio on. I cannot delete the audio unless I navigate 
 to the track below and press control P. No idea why.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Slate Digital Virtual Mix Rack: Accessibility Fail!

[Matt Diemert]

Scott, so far both the RTA ass and aax Versions are unusable. Nothing is 
labeled that makes any sense. I was able to get the revival plug to work by 
having someone cited drag it into the plug-in. Then I moved the thickness 
parameter and saved it as a default plug-in. So at least I can move the 
thickness and shimmer settings for the free plug.

Sent from my iPhone

 On Nov 25, 2014, at 2:49 PM, Scott Chesworth scottcheswo...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Urgh, disappointing.
 
 I've never managed to get a response directly from Steven himself
 (tried via Twitter as I couldn't find an email). Based on that, I'd
 say you'd likely be spending time more productively hitting up Paul
 via email and getting on the phone with Kevin. Either way, please make
 them aware of it man. I'll do the same.
 
 One thing... before Chris and I and whoever else here cares enough to
 start a mini crusade, could someone tried this with the AAX format? I
 ask because it strikes me as odd that presumably anyone using a
 control surface will also be being served up a raw deal. That's a lot
 of users, surely! That makes me wonder whether it's something that's
 gone awry during the port process, rather than the automatable
 parameters being this shoddy across the board...
 
 Scott
 
 On 11/25/14, Chris Smart csma...@cogeco.ca wrote:
 Hi folks.
 
 I don't know what the situation is like under ProTools on the Mac,
 but on Windows, Slate Digital's VMR is an accessibility fail.
 
 Their other plug-ins (VBC VCC VTM) expose parameters with meaningful
 names and in Sonar, I can adjust them in the Inspector., and use them
 on just about everything. I assume a similar thing happens in Reaper
 when you list parameters.
 
 When you install VMR, one of the possibilities given is to install
 individual modules. This suggests that possibly, you could then work
 with the VMR components as individual plug-ins.  Nope.  You insert
 the VMR on a track or bus, and that's it!
 
 Looking at the list of exposed parameters we have the following:
 Bypass on/off: I assume this is a global bypass.
 Then we have a list of A power on/off through H power on/off: I
 assume this is power on/off for each of eight slots in the rack. We
 also have A through H solos, which I assume solo each of eight slots
 in the rack. Since individual components like EQ's and compressors
 can be reordered by sighted users, these parameter labels tell us
 nothing useful, such as the contents of each rack slot.
 
 Then it gets more obtuse. A1 through A16, B1 through B16, all the way
 to H1 through H16.
 
 I'm going to submit a ticket to technical support, but if someone has
 a direct email for Steven Slate himself, perhaps he should be made
 aware of this.
 
 It's a shame, since given the quality of this stuff, I was going to
 replace my Waves Neave and 1176 emulations with this, among other things.
 
 
 Chris
 
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Protools with Mac Mini

[Matt Diemert]

Also, if I remember correctly, the new model has two thunderbolt ports. This 
could be very important at some point in time.

Sent from my iPhone

 On Nov 4, 2014, at 11:22 AM, ashley cox ashleycox...@googlemail.com wrote:
 
 I’d probably go with the 2012 model and upgrade the ram
 
 On 4 Nov 2014, at 16:20, Black blackwizard2...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Hi all,
 Does anyone work with ProTools on new Mac Mini latest 2014?
 I’m making a decision to buy between the 2012 and 2014 model.
 The main difference between dose is the CPU For the same price the 2012 
 model contains 2.3 quart core I7 Gen3 4 Gb ram, while the 2014 model 
 consists of 2.6 duo core I5 gen4 8 Gb ram.
 Wich one should I choose?
 Best,
 Black
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: click track

[Matt Diemert]

Hello, if you have a numeric keypad press the number seven.

Sent from my iPhone

 On Jul 27, 2014, at 10:25 PM, Steve Sparrow i...@sparrowsound.com.au wrote:
 
 Hi. anyone tell me how to enable the click track in p t. i have set my tempo, 
 and all that stuff, just not sure how to enable it and disable the click.
 Steve
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: How should I handle this situation?

[Matt Diemert]

Chuck, you certainly could do it this way, but sometimes I want to do multiple 
tracks at the same time so the plug-in method what's easier for me.

Sent from my iPhone

 On Jul 9, 2014, at 11:02 AM, CHUCK REICHEL soundpicturerecord...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 
 Hi Matt,
 Jason posted the pt key commands for adjusting clip gain several months ago.
 So may be Jason can chime in to give the steps to using clip gain again?
 I haven't used the steps as of yet so I can't give you the exact steps.
 YMMV
 Chuck
 
 
 CHUCK REICHEL
 soundpicturerecord...@gmail.com
 www.SoundPictureRecording.com
 954-742-0019
 Isaiah 26 : 3
  Thou wilt keep him in perfect peace, whose mind is stayed on thee: because 
 he trusteth in thee.
 
 In GOD I Trust
 
 On Jul 9, 2014, at 9:55 AM, mcdiemert . wrote:
 
 Rosco,
 I'm on the road much of this morning, and mid day, but will try to do
 this for you when I'm back home. I'll email you privately with the
 public link.
 
 On 7/9/14, Rosco Vittore relu...@gmail.com wrote:
 If you could dropbox those plug presets to me, and explain how to go about
 importing them, that would be very appreciated.
 
 I don't personally have the Dropbox software, so doing a share folder would
 
 not be the easiest.  If you could just e-mail me a public link to get them,
 
 that would be great.
 
 Rosco.
 
 - Original Message -
 From: mcdiemert . mcdiem...@gmail.com
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 8:45 AM
 Subject: Re: How should I handle this situation?
 
 
 Rosco, Typically, I use the Trem plugin which would allow you to say
 adjust the gain down 10db sort of acting as a pad. However, In pro
 Tools 11, I can't seem to get VO to adjust the slider in this plug in.
 I have made a few presets of 5db incraments which I could potentially
 put in dropbox if you had any intrest in approaching it this way. This
 is another reason why I keep PT 10 around there are just a few plugs
 that I need in a pinch that I have little access to in PT 11.
 
 
 On 7/9/14, Rosco Vittore relu...@gmail.com wrote:
 Guys,
 
 I do understand that this may be more a mixing question than it is a PT
 question in and of itself. Therefore, I'm going to be brief.
 
 The story goes, that I have a song which I need to record my lead vocals
 
 on
 
 the top of. The music has already been done as a Sound Choice karaoke
 soundtrack which I have ripped from CD into lossless wave format.
 Effectively, I need to import this wave file on a stereo audio track in
 PT
 11. That's not the issue though; I definitely know how to do that. The
 problem is, as most of you know, any production material which is in
 final
 release mainstream finalization is most likely going to already be
 mixed,
 and more likely still, mastered. This means that they're going to ride
 their
 
 fader as close to 0DB as they can.  The issue is, by default, in PT, the
 meter is set to show my input level, which is generally exactly what I'd
 want. In this case however, I need to find some way before doing
 anything
 with my master fader that I can get that karaoke track down to about
 a -14
 to -12 DB level. If I run my fader on the track from the default of 0DB
 downward to a negative value, say, -4DB we'll just say, that isn't going
 
 to
 
 effect the meter readout right to the right of that fader since we're
 dealing with the input level, not the output. Am I understanding
 correctly?
 
 In other words, regardless where I move that volume slider, the meter
 isn't
 
 going to change read a lower or higher value than before.
 
 If this is the case, and I'm correct, then what's the best technique for
 dealing with this? I just don't want all that extra gain in there on top
 
 of
 
 the vocal and all else. If I leave this volume where it is, no doubt in
 the
 
 masterring process when I start making my final mix, I'm gonna peek my
 master fader's meter bigtime which is totally undesirable!
 
 Can you all recommend anything? How would be the best way to deal with
 this?
 
 Should I configure PT to show the meters as output instead of input? If
 so,
 
 how do I do it? If not, what would be advised?
 
 Thanks.
 
 Rosco.
 
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 
 --
 Warm Regards:
 Matt Diemert
 330-980-0046
 
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send

Re: most accessible pro tools 10 and 11 combination

[Matt Diemert]

From what I can tell, this is also where ProTools puts the plug-ins for 
version 11, so this would have an adverse effect on him as he's running both 
10 and 11. This is why I personally run version 10.0, and version 11.1.3. 
Rather than running an updated version of 10. It gives me access to both our 
TAS, and AAS plug-ins.

Sent from my iPhone

 On Jun 28, 2014, at 12:09 AM, TheOreoMonster monkeypushe...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 That's exactly why i thought you were doing and thats not where to delete 
 them from. 
 The correct path is on your macintosh HD/Library folder. I don't remember the 
 exact path right now as I   do not have pro tools installed on this mac at 
 the moment. But in that library folder you should find an avid or  digidesign 
 folder and a plug in folder in  there, where you should find the .aax 
 files.On Jun 27, 2014, at 7:58 PM, Nick Gawronski n...@nickgawronski.com 
 wrote:
 
 Hi, I am going into the Avid folder and then I believe the pro tools folder 
 then going into the AAX folder and deleting all of those files in that 
 alias.  I then go back and delete the alias to make sure things are removed. 
  Is this the best process?  Nick Gawronski
 On 6/27/2014 12:22 AM, TheOreoMonster wrote:
 Where are you removing the AAX plug ins from? I find most people are 
 removing them from the degidesign or avid folder in their application 
 folder and i think that just delete the alieus (aka the shortcut as you may 
 think of it on windows) but not the actual plug ins.
 On Jun 18, 2014, at 4:42 AM, Nick Gawronski n...@nickgawronski.com wrote:
 
 Hi, With pro tools 10.3.9 I have tried the method of removing the AAX
 plugins but the RTAS plugins don't appear and when I go into any effects
 with the AAX plugins I find that they are not very usable at all.  What is
 the most accessible combination of pro tools 10 and pro tools 11 that is
 around currently and how do I get both of these installations working
 properly where I can use the plugins?  Nick Gawronski
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Where am i?

[Matt Diemert]

Hello, the best way to do this, is to use voiceovers hotspot features. I would 
put a hot spot at start, end, and length

Sent from my iPhone

 On Apr 16, 2014, at 9:34 PM, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 I am not in front of my mac right now, but it is in the edit screen under one 
 of your clusters, I just can't remember the name.  If I turn PT on here soon 
 I will let you know the name of the cluster that you need to interact with, 
 it is related to the currser. 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: taking the plunge

[Matt Diemert]

Good morning, I personally use the scarlet 18 I 20, fromfocusrite is pretty 
much the sapphire 40. One major advantage is you don't really need to use the 
Scarlet makes control. Once installed I simply just use this in ProTools. Very 
decent sounding unit for the price point! I'm very impressed with it

Sent from my iPhone

 On Apr 11, 2014, at 10:46 PM, Steve Sparrow i...@sparrowsound.com.au wrote:
 
 Just to add to my last email. I have also looked at the usb pre sonis  and 
 would consider this if is accessible with voice over, I’ve also thought about 
 the apolo, but there is not much i o on the u a d   stuff. But i’ve heard 
 great things about there plugging. I know ford and others on this list uses u 
 a d plugging, But i’m not sure about accessibility on there hardware.
 As i said, i’m happy to consider all options. I’d also settle for less mic 
 press if everything else was looking good.
 
 Steve
 On 12 Apr 2014, at 2:48 am, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Well Steve, I would think about the Digi 002, 003 or avid artust series. The 
 Digi 002 will be the cheepist, but if you need good built in preamps, it is 
 the bottom of the line more or less. Also, the 002 can work with Protools 
 11, but may not carry over to any versions after 11, I have a 002 and a 003 
 as well as the onyx 1620I. Are you going to use outboard pres or converters? 
 Are you going to be recording professionally for clients, or for more 
 personal stuff? These answers will make a difference. If you were recording 
 for your self, you could probably get away with some of the UA apollo stuff 
 and have some decent converters, pres and affects/plugs, but if you will 
 have larger sessions where you would record multable sources at once then a 
 control surface would be the way to go IMO.
 - Original Message -
 From: Steve Sparrow
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 9:43 PM
 Subject: RE: taking the plunge
 
 Hey Poppa bear. I was wondering if you could tell me what audio 
 interface-soundcard you run with pro tools. I’m interested to know what you 
 rrun , as I’m about to upgrade, and need more advice on choosing something, 
 that will take care of all my audio needs, and is accessable.
 I’ve bought a mac book pro, and am learning voice over, and I love it.
 Hoping to start investigating tools in a couple of months
 Stgeve
  
  
 From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com[mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf 
 OfPoppa Bear
 Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:58 AM
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Subject: Re: taking the plunge
  
 Hello Steve, this is Poppa Bear from the midi list, glad you made it over 
 here, Chris Smart is over here now and a couple others as well. Slau gave 
 you a good solad bottem line answer. After almost two years with PT, I can't 
 see myself going back to Sonar for recording/engineering. I can't speak on 
 the music production side as much because I am mainly running PT to record, 
 mix and master my clients now.
 - Original Message -
 From: Slau Halatyn
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 7:08 AM
 Subject: Re: taking the plunge
  
 Hi Steve,
  
 Welcome to the list. I can't comment on the comparison to sonar as I've 
 never used it. I've used Pro Tools since around 2001 after switching from an 
 analog console and multitrack tape machine. I won't sugarcoat it: you have a 
 steep learning curve in front of you. You'll need to understand VoiceOver 
 like the back of your hand as well as have a good grasp of the OS and how it 
 works. Aside from that, Pro Tools is undoubtedly a complex program but so is 
 Sonar and you learned that over time so, most importantly, you'll have to 
 plan to spend a bunch of time learning it if you decide to go down this path.
  
 Cheers,
  
 Slau
  
 On Mar 12, 2014, at 7:26 AM, Steve Sparrow i...@sparrowsound.com.au wrote:
 
 
  
  
 From: Steve Sparrow [mailto:i...@sparrowsound.com.au] 
 Sent: Wednesday, March 12,
 Hi. My name is Steve Sparrow. I have just joined the list here. I am very 
 seriously considering working with pro tools. I am currently a sonar user 
 running sonar 8.5 with jaws. I am now considering pro tools, mainly because 
 as we know the current sonar is no longer as accessable as it was. I have 
 not bought a mac yet, but I think I’m getting very close to doing so. I know 
 a little about voice over, and would be happy to put the time in to learning 
 it. But I have never used pro tools and no nothing of it’s workings. So not 
 really sured just where to start. I guess the first thing to find out is 
 just how much access we have. I run a recording studio, and use sonar just 
 about all the time. Does pro tools give us as much accessability as what I 
 am used too in sonar. I am quiet happy to put the time in to learning a new 
 system, if I can turn it in to a good solid work horse. I also use a lot of 
 waves plugins. mainly waves API, and ssl 4000 colections. I also use a 

Re: taking the plunge

[Matt Diemert]

Hello, not sure if it works in sonar, but I have used it in reaper under 
windows with success. I have tracked entire albums with this unit and the sound 
quality couple with ProTools comes out very nicely

Sent from my iPhone

 On Apr 12, 2014, at 8:11 PM, Steve Sparrow i...@sparrowsound.com.au wrote:
 
 Ok. Thanks for this mat. I have heard good things about the scarlet. Think 
 i’ll just go and check this out. 
 Do you know if it works with windows and jaws, running sonar. 
 I am just getting in to the mac, only had one for a couple of weeks. I will 
 more than likely be running sonar 8.5.3 for at least a few months yet. But 
 tools is ware i’m heading i think.
 Focus right do some nice stuff. 
 Thanks again.
 Steve
 On 12 Apr 2014, at 11:06 pm, Matt Diemert mcdiem...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Good morning, I personally use the scarlet 18 I 20, fromfocusrite is pretty 
 much the sapphire 40. One major advantage is you don't really need to use 
 the Scarlet makes control. Once installed I simply just use this in 
 ProTools. Very decent sounding unit for the price point! I'm very impressed 
 with it
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
 On Apr 11, 2014, at 10:46 PM, Steve Sparrow i...@sparrowsound.com.au 
 wrote:
 
 Just to add to my last email. I have also looked at the usb pre sonis  and 
 would consider this if is accessible with voice over, I’ve also thought 
 about the apolo, but there is not much i o on the u a d   stuff. But i’ve 
 heard great things about there plugging. I know ford and others on this 
 list uses u a d plugging, But i’m not sure about accessibility on there 
 hardware.
 As i said, i’m happy to consider all options. I’d also settle for less mic 
 press if everything else was looking good.
 
 Steve
 On 12 Apr 2014, at 2:48 am, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Well Steve, I would think about the Digi 002, 003 or avid artust series. 
 The Digi 002 will be the cheepist, but if you need good built in preamps, 
 it is the bottom of the line more or less. Also, the 002 can work with 
 Protools 11, but may not carry over to any versions after 11, I have a 002 
 and a 003 as well as the onyx 1620I. Are you going to use outboard pres or 
 converters? Are you going to be recording professionally for clients, or 
 for more personal stuff? These answers will make a difference. If you were 
 recording for your self, you could probably get away with some of the UA 
 apollo stuff and have some decent converters, pres and affects/plugs, but 
 if you will have larger sessions where you would record multable sources 
 at once then a control surface would be the way to go IMO.
 - Original Message -
 From: Steve Sparrow
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 9:43 PM
 Subject: RE: taking the plunge
 
 Hey Poppa bear. I was wondering if you could tell me what audio 
 interface-soundcard you run with pro tools. I’m interested to know what 
 you rrun , as I’m about to upgrade, and need more advice on choosing 
 something, that will take care of all my audio needs, and is accessable.
 I’ve bought a mac book pro, and am learning voice over, and I love it.
 Hoping to start investigating tools in a couple of months
 Stgeve
  
  
 From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com[mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On 
 Behalf OfPoppa Bear
 Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:58 AM
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Subject: Re: taking the plunge
  
 Hello Steve, this is Poppa Bear from the midi list, glad you made it over 
 here, Chris Smart is over here now and a couple others as well. Slau gave 
 you a good solad bottem line answer. After almost two years with PT, I 
 can't see myself going back to Sonar for recording/engineering. I can't 
 speak on the music production side as much because I am mainly running PT 
 to record, mix and master my clients now.
 - Original Message -
 From: Slau Halatyn
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 7:08 AM
 Subject: Re: taking the plunge
  
 Hi Steve,
  
 Welcome to the list. I can't comment on the comparison to sonar as I've 
 never used it. I've used Pro Tools since around 2001 after switching from 
 an analog console and multitrack tape machine. I won't sugarcoat it: you 
 have a steep learning curve in front of you. You'll need to understand 
 VoiceOver like the back of your hand as well as have a good grasp of the 
 OS and how it works. Aside from that, Pro Tools is undoubtedly a complex 
 program but so is Sonar and you learned that over time so, most 
 importantly, you'll have to plan to spend a bunch of time learning it if 
 you decide to go down this path.
  
 Cheers,
  
 Slau
  
 On Mar 12, 2014, at 7:26 AM, Steve Sparrow i...@sparrowsound.com.au 
 wrote:
 
 
  
  
 From: Steve Sparrow [mailto:i...@sparrowsound.com.au] 
 Sent: Wednesday, March 12,
 Hi. My name is Steve Sparrow. I have just joined the list here. I am very 
 seriously considering working with pro tools. I am currently a sonar user 
 running sonar 8.5 with jaws. I

Re: control surfaces

[Matt Diemert]

I'm on Mavericks as well, but the Alpha track works seamlessly!

Sent from my iPhone

 On Mar 21, 2014, at 7:28 AM, John Gunn g...@tznet.com wrote:
 
 Slau,
 
 A friend of mind is using the Presonus fader port and it uses the HUE 
 configuration but thanks for asking.
 
 Regarding Matt's suggestion I am unable to find one and when going to 
 Frontierdesign.com the latest drivers is for Lion and I'm on Mavericks.
 
 John
 
 
 On Mar 20, 2014, at 7:16 AM, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Hi John,
 
 Check to see if it uses the HUI protocol which Pro Tools uses to connect 
 with many control surfaces. If so, there's a good chance it'll work but, as 
 always, checking with the manufacturer is perhaps the best way to confirm 
 whether it'll be recognized.
 
 Keep us posted,
 
 Slau
 
 On Mar 20, 2014, at 6:43 AM, John Gunn g...@tznet.com wrote:
 
 Hello,
 
 Besides of a control surface, has anyone had or use the Presonus fader 
 Port?  I have an Mbox Pro and a modest setup which is why I am asking.
 
 John
 
 
 On Mar 19, 2014, at 7:13 PM, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 You might consider the Avid Artist series. From what I recall, Jason 
 Dasent went that route. Again, not sure what your budget is.
 
 Slau
 
 On Mar 19, 2014, at 7:14 PM, Jed Barton j...@jedbarton.com wrote:
 
 Haven't looked at anything yet, any ideas?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On 
 Behalf
 Of Slau Halatyn
 Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 6:38 PM
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Subject: Re: control surfaces
 
 What have you already looked at in your budget?
 On Mar 17, 2014, at 10:53 PM, Jed Barton j...@jedbarton.com wrote:
 
 Hey guys,
 I am about to buy my protools setup.  What I need is a good control
 surface,
 something with an audio scrub wheel.  Do you have any suggestions?
 
 Cheers,
 Jed
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Universal audio plugs

[Matt Diemert]

There is currently no way to check out the demos without having one of their 
pieces of hardware to run to the plug-ins. That's the disappointing thing at 
times.

Sent from my iPhone

 On Mar 13, 2014, at 11:34 AM, Chris Smart csma...@cogeco.ca wrote:
 
 Check out the demos. many of the UA plugs are excelent!
 
 I don't yet have the hardware to run them here on the Windows side, but they 
 really are nice. Especially good for me at least are the reverbs.
 At 10:57 AM 3/13/2014, you wrote:
 I was checking these out yesterday online. I wonder how they are on PT11. 
 The Church I go to has one. I wonder if the 32bit floating point they have 
 is a step up or down from PT 64 capabilities? Never the less, it is nice to 
 know now. Thanks for the feedback.
 - Original Message - From: mcdiemert . mcdiem...@gmail.com
 To: ptaccess ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 5:04 AM
 Subject: Universal audio plugs
 
 
 Good morning all,
 I had a chance to check out some universal audio plugs the other night
 on my friends rig. He is running pt 9.3 so, these are RTAS plugs, but
 the plugs worked seamlessly with Voice over!  I tried probably 3 or 4
 compressors, including the neve, and LA-2  as well as the 140 reverb,
 and ocean way verb.  I ordered an apollo twin duo yesterday as it
 comes with 12 of the UAD plugs at no additional cost.
 Just thought this might be welcomed news to some of you.
 
 --
 Warm Regards:
 Matt Diemert
 330-980-0046
 
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Instructions for using clip gain.

[Matt Diemert]

I go boy is extremely user-friendly with PDN voiceover! I throw that delay on a 
lot of things! Decapitate her is also fail usable!

Sent from my iPhone

 On Mar 5, 2014, at 4:06 PM, Chris Smart csma...@cogeco.ca wrote:
 
 I'm not sure how accessible it is in PT, I'm still on Sonar here, but 
 SoundToys make an excelent delay plug-in called Echo Boy. Check it out! Also, 
 their distortion plug called Decapitator is a favorite of many people as well.
 
 At 11:06 AM 3/5/2014, you wrote:
 Pan man from sound toys is fairly accessible! I really like the
 algorithms  are pretty good as well. Overall, I find the ST plugs
 fairly accessible.
 
 On 3/5/14, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote:
  No such thing as clip panning, per se, because clips (or audio regions)
  simply reside in a track and panning is a function of that track's output.
  I'm not sure what you mean by automation being necessary to pan. Of course,
  panning is static unless automation is applied to dynamically alter the
  panning throughout the timeline. Also, there are auto panning plug-ins but 
  I
  haven't used any.
 
  HTH,
 
  Slau
 
  On Mar 4, 2014, at 10:52 PM, TheOreoMonster monkeypushe...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
  Cool, so does pro tools have clip pan as well or just clip gain, and you
  have  to use automation for panning?
 
 
  On Mar 4, 2014, at 9:45 AM, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  Yep. Also, if you're trying to match a clip to a neighboring region, you
  can use the audition shortcuts. Command-Option-left arrow will play the
  front of the selected region by the pre and post roll value leading up to
  and past the left-most region boundary while Command-Option-right arrow
  will do the same for the right side of the region boundary.
 
  Slau
 
  On Mar 4, 2014, at 8:42 AM, HF hermanfer...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  lip gain is pretty awesome. It's even easier though. After you make a
  clip you can immediately use control+shift+up or down arrow to adjust.
  If you have loop playback checked, you can loop and listen and adjust
  until you get to where you want it.
 
  HF
  On 3/4/2014 6:10 AM, studiojay wrote:
  Hi everyone,
I am very happy to say that clip gain is very accessible. I use it
  all the time for nudging vocal phrases up or down instead of
  automation. I find it more accurate and it's undoable. Here are step by
  step instructions.
Under the editing tab of pro tools preferences, interact with clips,
  and vo right arrow to clip nudge value, and vo space bar on the actual
  value. Press the delete key to clear the current value, then type in
  the value in DB that you want such as 2.0
  Ok out of preferences, then under the clips sub menu of the view menu,
  make sure that clip gain line and clip gain info are both checked. Now
  you can use the key commands shift control up arrow and shift control
  down arrow to nudge the value up or down. Oh, I forgot to mention that
  before you can nudge the value you have to select the region you want
  to nudge, then press command E to separate it in to it's own clip.
  Also, the commands shift control up and down arrows may be assigned to
  os 10 commands, so make sure to turn them off in system preferences.
  Hope this helps.
  Jason
  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
  Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
  an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
  Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
  an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
  Pro Tools Accessibility group.
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
  email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
  Pro Tools Accessibility group.
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
  email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
  Pro Tools Accessibility group.
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
  email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
 
 --
 Warm Regards:
 Matt Diemert
 330-980-0046
 
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group

Re: Novice User - Track Selection Issue

[Matt Diemert]

I typically use this if for some reason I have all tracks selected because 
pressing control p at this point would not change the selection. Nv

S  from my iPhone

 On Feb 27, 2014, at 8:40 AM, Scott Chesworth scottcheswo...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Hey Slau,
 
 Just curious, what's the difference between that CTRL+Option+;
 keystroke to retract the insertion cursor from the bottom track and
 using CTRL+P to select the track above? I've never encountered the
 keystroke you mentioned, trying to think of a use case where it'd
 apply so there's more chance I'll remember it.
 
 Scott
 
 On 2/27/14, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote:
 To retract the insertion cursor from the bottom-most track, use the keyboard
 shortcut Control-Option-semicolon. This, however, is also the VoiceOver
 command for keyboard lock. So, you must first pass the shortcut through with
 Control-Option-tab, then use Control-Option-semicolon to retract the
 insertion from the bottom track. From there, you can use Control--semicolon
 and Control-p to move the insertion cursor to the desired track for
 editing.
 
 If all else absolutely fails and, for some reason, you can't get the cursor
 retracted, create a new track which whill automatically deselect the other
 tracks and the insertion cursor will be in the new track. Move the cursor
 with the shortcut keys to the desired track.
 
 BTW, make sure the All group isn't enabled or else the insertion cursor will
 be within all tracks no matter what you do.
 
 HTH,
 
 Slau
 
 On Feb 27, 2014, at 2:16 AM, Des Delgadillo desdelgadi...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
 Hi:
 
 I'm curious as to whether someone else has encountered this issue and how,
 if at all, they were able to solve it. When in the track list, I notice
 that once a track is selected, I cannot unselect it. So when I need to
 select and edit a different track, my consequent edit will be applied to
 both tracks.
 
 I have tried everything I could think of, including quitting and
 re-opening my session to no avail. Is there a shortcut or step I might be
 missing? Any direction would be greatly appreciated.
 Des
 
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Drum tracks, the saga continues

[matt diemert]

Be sure to unzip the file, and place it in the location I indicated.
Once done you can place this plug on a track, and then choose one of
these presets as a starting point.  If then you didn't want to try and
drum an entire song, You could drum a few measures of the song, and
duplicate the measure, and/or copy and paste and put it in various
points of the song.
Also consider looking in to midi merge. It would allow you to say put
a kick and snare in first, and go back and put all your accessory
drums in place.


Sent from my iPhone

 On Feb 19, 2014, at 3:27 PM, Scott Chesworth scottcheswo...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hey Matt,

 Would be great if I could grab those presets for Addictive from you?
 As things stand I'm tweaking kit sounds using the automatable controls
 in Reaper, but there's close to 250 controls to wade through, so some
 presets as starting points would likely be a huge timesaver! Plus, as
 I move over to PT for composition, I've no idea whether we get the
 same amount of access on that platform yet.

 Cheers

 Scott


 On 2/19/14, matt diemert mcdiem...@gmail.com wrote:
 Krister,
 I have much of the precets for AD, but, at this point, I've never been
 able to use the built-in loops, grooves that they offer. I switch
 between precets, and build my own drums manually via an m-Audio
 keyboard.  I'm a huge fan of Adictive and just bought the jaz brush
 pack, as my third AD pack add on. Have you considered using addictive
 to create loops for the things you are working with? Meaning maybe you
 play a few bars of something, and quantize it, and duplicate it to
 create a drum track? If you decide you want to buy addictive, reach
 out to me, and I'd be happy to gather up my presets.

 On 2/19/14, Krister Ekstrom kris...@kristersplace.com wrote:
 When i wrote to XLN, all they said were, We're sorry our program doesn't
 work for you and i got the impression they didn't want to help at all.
 If
 it was possible to get preset files for either addictive drums or strike
 i'd
 buy AD without delay and have someone sighted help me with installing it,
 since their online installer won't work at all for us, that is, it works
 when you fill in details about your name and such, but then it changes
 interface from plain html into something unreadable for Voiceover and then
 i
 can't do a thing with it.
 But as i said any help with preset files for either Strike or AD or any
 alternative suggestion is greatly appreciated.
 Thanks.
 /Krister

 19 feb 2014 kl. 19:44 skrev Scott Chesworth scottcheswo...@gmail.com:

 I'm sure I recall someone saying that XLN were really helpful in
 providing them with a bunch of preset files for Addictive Drums.
 Question is, what format does Pro Tools need? Could I bring over fxp
 files for example?

 Scott

 On 2/19/14, Krister Ekstrom kris...@kristersplace.com wrote:
 Hi there,
 I have so far tried to use Strike 2 and Addictive drums the demo
 version,
 but none of them has styles or kits in the presets list, all it says is
 factory defaults.
 I have also tried XLN Electric grand since i love the sound of the
 Yamaha
 CP80 electric grand piano but it's hard to work with, but i think it
 can
 be
 editable from a midi keyboard. When it comes to Synths i have had
 somewhat
 success with the Arturia CS-80V. You can't get to the presets, however
 you
 can edit parameters and unlike in Pro tools 10 you now see the value of
 the
 parameters change as you arrow up and down in them and there are quite
 a
 lot
 of parameters you can now tweak.
 Hope this helps somewhat.
 /Krister

 19 feb 2014 kl. 17:42 skrev Scott Chesworth scottcheswo...@gmail.com:

 Interested in any answers here too. I'm throwing together a bunch of
 new tunage at the moment and was hoping to bring the composition side
 of things over to PT 11. I'm relatively productive editing and mixing
 in PT, but composition itself is a hither to untamed beast.

 Krister, would probably be helpful to know what plugs you've tried and
 had no joy with so far, so that we're not doubling efforts if nobody
 has answers yet.

 Also interested in recommendations of usable synths if anyone has
 experience to share.

 Cheers all

 Scott

 On 2/19/14, Krister Ekstrom kris...@kristersplace.com wrote:
 Hi all,
 I have been searching for a drum plugin where i can have grooves and
 fills
 played from the keyboard, like Strike for example. It now turns out
 Strike
 no longer works effectively for us under Pro tools since there is no
 longer
 a possibility to change styles, kits etc in the Pro tools preset list
 as
 it
 once was with PT 10, so i wonder how do you people out there do drum
 tracks?
 What do you use? I must say i'm bad at keeping time even with a
 metronome
 and i don't quite know if i can quantize anything pre recording, as
 it
 was
 in Sonar you only could quantize afterwards and that sounded
 disastrous
 when
 i recorded so i gave up on that.
 Any help would be very much appreciated.
 /Krister

 --
 You received this message because

Re: Drum tracks, the saga continues

[matt diemert]

Scott,
Give me a day, or so, and I'll throw them in Dropbox.
Some of the names aren't always right as I forgot about chucks trick
for copying the last thing said by VO.  Also, some seem duplicated,
because I created a version with outs, meaning they could be sent to
individual tracks to have complete control over compression and EQ on
individual pieces. I personally kept version 10.0 around on my system
to maintain access to RTAS plugs, and in doing so all of the controls
within AD are usable from VO. There are however, several things we
can't get to, as far as changing out pieces and setting up outs, so
there  is  where presets are extremely helpful. I think there is
nearly 70 of them.


On 2/19/14, Scott Chesworth scottcheswo...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hey Matt,

 Would be great if I could grab those presets for Addictive from you?
 As things stand I'm tweaking kit sounds using the automatable controls
 in Reaper, but there's close to 250 controls to wade through, so some
 presets as starting points would likely be a huge timesaver! Plus, as
 I move over to PT for composition, I've no idea whether we get the
 same amount of access on that platform yet.

 Cheers

 Scott


 On 2/19/14, matt diemert mcdiem...@gmail.com wrote:
 Krister,
 I have much of the precets for AD, but, at this point, I've never been
 able to use the built-in loops, grooves that they offer. I switch
 between precets, and build my own drums manually via an m-Audio
 keyboard.  I'm a huge fan of Adictive and just bought the jaz brush
 pack, as my third AD pack add on. Have you considered using addictive
 to create loops for the things you are working with? Meaning maybe you
 play a few bars of something, and quantize it, and duplicate it to
 create a drum track? If you decide you want to buy addictive, reach
 out to me, and I'd be happy to gather up my presets.

 On 2/19/14, Krister Ekstrom kris...@kristersplace.com wrote:
 When i wrote to XLN, all they said were, We're sorry our program
 doesn't
 work for you and i got the impression they didn't want to help at all.
 If
 it was possible to get preset files for either addictive drums or strike
 i'd
 buy AD without delay and have someone sighted help me with installing
 it,
 since their online installer won't work at all for us, that is, it works
 when you fill in details about your name and such, but then it changes
 interface from plain html into something unreadable for Voiceover and
 then
 i
 can't do a thing with it.
 But as i said any help with preset files for either Strike or AD or any
 alternative suggestion is greatly appreciated.
 Thanks.
 /Krister

 19 feb 2014 kl. 19:44 skrev Scott Chesworth scottcheswo...@gmail.com:

 I'm sure I recall someone saying that XLN were really helpful in
 providing them with a bunch of preset files for Addictive Drums.
 Question is, what format does Pro Tools need? Could I bring over fxp
 files for example?

 Scott

 On 2/19/14, Krister Ekstrom kris...@kristersplace.com wrote:
 Hi there,
 I have so far tried to use Strike 2 and Addictive drums the demo
 version,
 but none of them has styles or kits in the presets list, all it says
 is
 factory defaults.
 I have also tried XLN Electric grand since i love the sound of the
 Yamaha
 CP80 electric grand piano but it's hard to work with, but i think it
 can
 be
 editable from a midi keyboard. When it comes to Synths i have had
 somewhat
 success with the Arturia CS-80V. You can't get to the presets, however
 you
 can edit parameters and unlike in Pro tools 10 you now see the value
 of
 the
 parameters change as you arrow up and down in them and there are quite
 a
 lot
 of parameters you can now tweak.
 Hope this helps somewhat.
 /Krister

 19 feb 2014 kl. 17:42 skrev Scott Chesworth
 scottcheswo...@gmail.com:

 Interested in any answers here too. I'm throwing together a bunch of
 new tunage at the moment and was hoping to bring the composition side
 of things over to PT 11. I'm relatively productive editing and mixing
 in PT, but composition itself is a hither to untamed beast.

 Krister, would probably be helpful to know what plugs you've tried
 and
 had no joy with so far, so that we're not doubling efforts if nobody
 has answers yet.

 Also interested in recommendations of usable synths if anyone has
 experience to share.

 Cheers all

 Scott

 On 2/19/14, Krister Ekstrom kris...@kristersplace.com wrote:
 Hi all,
 I have been searching for a drum plugin where i can have grooves and
 fills
 played from the keyboard, like Strike for example. It now turns out
 Strike
 no longer works effectively for us under Pro tools since there is no
 longer
 a possibility to change styles, kits etc in the Pro tools preset
 list
 as
 it
 once was with PT 10, so i wonder how do you people out there do drum
 tracks?
 What do you use? I must say i'm bad at keeping time even with a
 metronome
 and i don't quite know if i can quantize anything pre recording, as
 it
 was
 in Sonar you only could quantize afterwards

Re: Changing start of a song

[Matt Diemert]

Hello, it's 9 on the numeric 

Sent from my iPhone

 On Feb 10, 2014, at 5:09 PM, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 That is bizarre… I don't remember that behavior under Snow Leopard but, then 
 again, I didn't use version 9 all that much. One more thought: Have you tried 
 using a num pad shortcut for toggling MIDI Merge? If I'm not mistaken, there 
 should be one. I don't recall. My control surface has a dedicated button for 
 toggling those things and I don't normally use the num pad for MIDI functions.
 
 Slau
 
 On Feb 10, 2014, at 4:52 PM, Eric Lambier elamb...@rogers.com wrote:
 
 It's bloody annoying cause I can select or deselect conductor, metronome, 
 wait for note, tempo, and count in toggle
 On 2014-02-10, at 4:41 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote:
 
 Hi Eric,
 
 I'm not sure why you're seeing that but I'd have to guess that you're on 
 Mountain Lion? Buttons don't reflect correct states in Mountain Lion. 
 clicking on the MIDI Merge button under Mavericks works correctly as it 
 does in snow Leopard. Let me know if that's the case for you.
 
 Slau
 
 On Feb 10, 2014, at 4:19 PM, Eric Lambier elamb...@rogers.com wrote:
 
 Hi Slau
 
 I have a question about the midi merge feature in the transport window. I 
 can't seem to deselect it. I've re booted and tried different sessions 
 templates and it still won't shut off. Any idea why?
 
 Many thanks
 
 Eric
 On 2014-02-04, at 1:10 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote:
 
 If you do the following, it should work. It assumes you have linked the 
 Edit and Timeline and that edit selection follows track selection under 
 your Options menu.
 1. Show all tracks.
 2. Go to the edit window.
 3. Press Command-Option-3 (on the numbers row) to bring keyboard focus to 
 the Groups List.
 4. Press Shift-1 which is the shortcut for the all group.
 5. Move the insertion point to the beginning of the song. Most of the 
 time, if you've scrubbed or played back somewhere in the session, 
 pressing Return to get to the start and tab once should bring you right 
 to the beginning of the first region. Mind you, if the song wasn't edited 
 to begin with, there might be a count-off bar or a few seconds of 
 fiddling around before the song really starts. If you wish to get rid of 
 that, get the insertion point to exactly where you want the playback to 
 start.
 6. Make sure you're in shuffle mode by pressing f1.
 7. While holding Shift, press return to select everything to the 
 beginning of the session.
 8. Press Delete.
 
 Keep in mind to disable the all group by pressing Shift-1 and that 
 keyboard focus is on the groups table so, if there are other groups in 
 the session and you inadvertently type, you might be enabling or 
 disabling groups. A good thing to do would be to get into Keyboard focus 
 mode with Command-Option-1. Of course, there, you might also 
 inadvertently type a command that might cause an edit function but I'm 
 assuming you're not randomly pressing letters while not in some dialog 
 box. You should be fine otherwise.
 
 HTH,
 
 Slau
 
 On Feb 4, 2014, at 12:23 PM, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 So, some of my clients come in with instrumentals that start late into 
 the metradome count and I can sometimes manipulate the start point buy 
 cutting space at the front end and using shuffle, but it isn't fool 
 proof. I noticed the change start point feature under the event/time 
 menue, but havent got a handle on it. Is there some pointers to getting 
 it to work?
 Thanks
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
 Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
 an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit 

Massy plugins

[matt diemert]

Hi all,
for those of you who may be on the look out for some accessible plugs,
here is a pack that works very well with PT 8 through 10 as they are
RTAS plugins.
As I understand it, they are free to try and don't expire, you are
encouraged to buy any that you like.  You will get a message the first
time your pro tools is opened after installing the plugs inviting you
to upgrade ETC, just say no and move on.


http://masseyplugins.com/#try




HTH
Matt

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: PACE Anti-Piracy's response regarding iLok License Manager accessibility

[matt diemert]

 to the Google Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
receiving emails from it, send an email
tomailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit
https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_outhttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


--
You received this message because you are
subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
receiving emails from it, send an email
tomailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit
https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_outhttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are
subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
receiving emails from it, send an email to
ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit
https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_outhttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



-- 
Warm Regards:
Matt Diemert
330-980-0046

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Accessibility pt10.3.8 vs pt11.1

[matt diemert]

Hi Slau,
In a previous message in this thread, you mentioned that the AAX plugs
were some what accessible in 10.3.8.  I had an instance last night
working on someones rig that was running this build, and I just pulled
up the 7 band EQ that is standard kit in Pro Tools. When navigating
the plug, voice over stopped at the automation settings button and
would not go down any further in to the actual EQ settings. Was I
doing something wrong, or, are the AAX plugs hit and miss in the
10.3.8 build. It's not a big deal as I can take everything home when
we're done working, but it'd be nice to throw some basic EQ in after
tracking something.
Thanks.

On 1/8/14, Chi Kim chigook...@hotmail.com wrote:
 Thanks Slau,
 Glad that the aax is accessible with pt10 to a certain degree. It's time
 for me to convince school to update to Mavericks along with pt11!

 Chi

 On 1/6/2014 1:16 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote:
 Hi Chi,

 OK, I've had a chance to review and refresh my memory of the issues of 10
 versus 11. Upon review, version 11 really contains all of the
 improvements. The only substantive improvement that version 10 has is
 mainly the accessibility of the counters and AAX plug-ins. Regarding the
 counters, that could quite possibly be because of Mavericks versus
 Mountain Lion. It's been 8 months since I tried version 11 on Mountain
 Lion and there were a load of problems, not the least of which was the
 counter display issue. So, with version 10.3.8, the counters are readable
 but, whether that's because of Mavericks or not, I can't say for sure as
 I've been on Mavericks since the bulk of the accessibility work started.

 regarding plug-ins, the AAX plug-ins are accessible for the most part in
 version 10 but not in the same way as they are in 11. In a pinch, I was
 able to use some plug-ins for an emergency after my beta license for 11
 ran out. iLok License Manager not yet being accessible, my only choice at
 the time was to use version 10 for which I had purchased a license back
 before the License Manager was introduced.

 So, with those two mentionable improvements but not much else that I can
 tell at a cursory glance, the focus is really on 11.

 Hope that helps,

 Slau

 On Jan 6, 2014, at 12:37 PM, Chi Kim chigook...@hotmail.com wrote:

 Hi Slau,

 Thanks for the explanation.
 I was just wondering how much accessibility improvement in 11 was
 included in 10.3.8 as well.
 Regardless, I'm looking forward to upgrading to 11!

 Chi

 On 1/5/2014 12:27 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote:
 Hi Chi,

 Yes, there is a difference. The focus on accessibility in the future
 will be on version 11. There were improvements to 10.3.8 for sure but it
 was not the primary concentration. From now on, any updates to version
 10 will be general maintenance and will not likely include significant
 improvements to accessibility. Much like bug fixes in other software,
 it's not expected that the developer will go back to previous versions
 of the software to fix the problem. The point is that it's fixed in the
 new version and that's it. In this situation, however, there are still
 people needing to use version 10 during the transition from 32 to 64 bit
 and while plug-in developers are pulling up the rear. I was surprised at
 how much was actually done in 10.3.8 to begin with.

 BTW, one task that is still only doable in 10 and not 11 is to create a
 custom nudge value. In 11, a VoiceOver user can only choose from the
 default values whereas in 10 they can click a button, type a value and
 be done. In neither version is the numeric value visible. Surely, it'll
 be fixed in 11 at some point but I doubt it'll be addressed in 10.

 Best,

 Slau


 On Jan 5, 2014, at 10:53 AM, Chi Kim chigook...@hotmail.com wrote:

 Hi,

 First Slau, congratulation on this milestone! Thank you for making this
 happen!
 Is there any difference in accessibility between pt10.3.8 vs pt11.1?
 Thanks,

 Chi

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



-- 
Warm Regards:
Matt Diemert
330-980-0046

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from

Re: Clearing solo for all tracks.

[matt diemert]

Poppa, As far as I'm able to tell, the only way to solo safe a track
is to physically click the solo button in track strip while holding
down command. In other words, when I'm on the solo button, I press
voiceover command f5 to bring mouse focus to the button, and while
holding down command, click on my mouse.

In regards to the other question, I typically keep my solo on xhor so
that my solo follows what ever track is selected, if I need to sol up
ultiple things I make my selection across those tracks first then
solo.
Hope this helps.

On 1/10/14, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:
 I don't want to highjack your post, but I am wondering something about
 soloing as well, is there a shortcut key command to put tracks on safe solo
 mode?
   - Original Message -
   From: studiojay
   To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
   Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 8:42 PM
   Subject: Clearing solo for all tracks.


   Hi everyone, is there a way to clear solos for all tracks in a session?
 Some times, I may have a track soloed and I can't remember which track it is
 especially in large sessions and the soloed track may not be playing at the
 posision in the session I am currently playing. I have to go through each
 track to find the soloed track. Thanks in advance for any help. Jason

   --
   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
   To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
   For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



-- 
Warm Regards:
Matt Diemert
330-980-0046

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: FYI Pro Tools 11.1 is now available.

[matt diemert]

, 2013, at 5:49 AM, byron harden stico...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 hello all.

 i would like to publicly thank slau  for all of the hard work.

 it is paying off.

 chers to a great humanbing,
 On Dec 27, 2013, at 4:05 PM, Gordon Kent dbm...@cybernex.net
 wrote:

 This is good news.  I was actually playing around a bit last night
 with
 the pro remote app for the iphone and pt10.  It does give you a
 lot of
 stuff and you can do things like mix automation and select regions
 and
 run the transport.  I haven’t figured out how to get at inserts
 and
 sends in the mix view yet.  I should try it on the iPad instead
 because
 it would fit a lot more at once.  You can run four instances of it
 to
 handle 32 tracks at once.  If I could get it to take the whole
 screen
 on the iPad i imagine I could get at a lot of stuff.  You do get
 values
 for everything, and PT responds quickly to your commands.  It’s a
 bit
 quirky getting it to connect to your wifi network sometimes but
 once it
 is on it works wherever you go.  I want to try it with braille so
 that
 I can do vocals and stuff with no speech going.
 Gord
 On Dec 27, 2013, at 3:59 PM, Slau Halatyn slauh...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 As many of you will recall, I practically threw in the towel a
 couple
 of months ago. As it turned out, there were programmers turning
 wheels
 without my knowledge. When I was made aware of this, frankly, it
 was a
 bit of a surprise. Actually, there are things in the works now
 that
 will bring even more improvements in the next release. I'm not
 supposed   to say yet but, if
 all
 goes according to plan, I believe the next two releases will
 bring us
 to as close as full access as we can get. Very exciting times.

 slau

 On Dec 27, 2013, at 3:02 PM, Poppa Bear heaven...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 This is great, thanks to all who have been behind the seens to
 continue to carry this torch mile after mile, and big thanks to
 Slau
 who has put in only God knows how much energy to keep this on
 the
 board as a extremely viable option for blind producers and
 musicians.
 - Original Message -
 From: Slau Halatyn
 To: ptac...@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Friday, December 27, 2013 8:41 AM
 Subject: Re: FYI Pro Tools 11.1 is now available.

 The fixes mentioned sound pretty obscure when they're worded in
 that
 fashion but, for what it's worth, there are a ton of fixes not
 the
 least of which is access to plug-ins unlike that which we had in
 the
 past. I'd love to list all of the improvements but there are so
 many
 that it would
 be
 difficult.

 Best,

 Slau

 On Dec 27, 2013, at 9:55 AM, matt diemert mcdi...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Also, for those interested 10.3.8 was released Monday as well.
 Grabbing it now to determine if there are any useful upgrades.
 I
 ordered my pt 11 Upgrade just now, but have to wait until eye
 balls
 are around for iLock purposes!


 On 12/27/13, Chris Norman chris@googlemail.com wrote:
 That's pretty amazing.

 I'll be tapping that when I've got another mac! :-)

 Have fun all, and hope you all had a merry christmas etc.

 On 27/12/2013 14:42, matt diemert wrote:
 Here is a list of accessibility fixes that I found on a
 forum.
 Certainly not saying this is exhaustive, but It's all I've
 been
 able
 to track down thus far!
 ◾PTSW-184656: AudioSuite window now includes Plug-In name.
 ◾PTSW-180095: Added Applescript support for the “Save
 Session
 Copy”
 command.
 ◾PTSW-180085: Improved support for Nudge values with the
 VoiceOver
 accessibility option in OSX.
 ◾PTSW-180084: Improved support for memory locations with the
 VoiceOver
 accessibility option in OSX.
 ◾PTSW-180083: Improved support for the Click II plug-in with
 the
 VoiceOver accessibility option in OSX.
 ◾PTSW-180082: Improved support for Memory Locations with the
 VoiceOver
 accessibility option in OSX.
 ◾PTSW-180080: Improved support for window configurations with
 the
 VoiceOver accessibility option in OSX.
 ◾PTSW-189731: Improved support for track selector, preset
 selection,
 and automation controls from within plug-in windows with the
 VoiceOver
 accessibility option in OSX.
 ◾PTSW-180081: Improved support for Delete Unused Playlist
 dialogs
 with
 the VoiceOver accessibility option in OSX.
 ◾PTSW-180078: Improved support for Beat Detective with the
 VoiceOver
 accessibility option in OSX


 On 12/27/13, Dread Beat Dadz dreadb...@gmail.com wrote:
 This is the update with the accessibility improvements. I
 have
 not gotten
 a

 chance to play around with it extensively, but at first
 glance it
 does
 seem

 to be more accessible than 11.0.3. The update was release
 on
 12/23/2013.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the
 Google
 Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
 from it,
 send
 an
 email to ptaccess+u...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit
 https://groups.google.com/groups

Re: FYI Pro Tools 11.1 is now available.

[Matt Diemert]

Thanks for the clarification, the release notes on the website are quite 
misleading, as they indicate the current version 11. 1. And 10. 3. Was not 
supported under mavericks. This is in the write up for December 23. Thanks 
again for letting us know. 

Sent from my iPhone

 On Jan 3, 2014, at 10:02 AM, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Yes, I'm running Mavericks. Avid officially supports Mavericks with 11 and 
 10.3.8.
 
 Slau
 
 On Jan 3, 2014, at 8:45 AM, Matt Diemert mcdiem...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Slau The README for the latest version says that 11.1 and 10.3 cannot be 
 supported under Mavericks. Are you running Mavericks on your laptop 
 currently?
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
 On Jan 3, 2014, at 8:41 AM, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Hi Scott,
 
 I'm not sure exactly what you read but Pro Tools 11 and 10 can coexist on 
 the same partition. That's what I currently have on my laptop.
 
 Slau
 
 On Jan 3, 2014, at 4:17 AM, Scott Chesworth scottcheswo...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 
 Hey folks,
 
 In plundering the Avid site for an 11.1 demo (which still doesn't seem
 to be available), I noticed this potential gotcha in the late breaking
 readme stuff:
 •Pro Tools 11.1 co-install with Pro Tools 10.x is not supported using
 Mac OS X 10.9 Mavericks (
 
 This is a bit of a bummer, seeing as it's exactly what I hoped to do
 until the cash for an upgrade to 11 becomes available. Does not
 supported mean it flat out doesn't work, or just that they won't take
 tech support requests about it?
 
 Cheers for any info
 
 Scott
 
 On 1/3/14, TheOreoMonster monkeypushe...@gmail.com wrote:
 Yes avid process of demoting into your system is accessible. If memory
 serves correct, they send you a link, you go there and click the accept or
 permit button allowing them into your system. Tech support should be on 
 the
 phone with you th e whole time and tell you what they are doing if VO 
 isn’t
 speaking it.
 
 BTW thanks for the tip on 10.3.8. I was wondering why it was only showing
 the Paid 11.0 upgrade and not 10.3.8 as well.
 
 On Jan 1, 2014, at 1:37 PM, Nick Gawronski n...@nickgawronski.com 
 wrote:
 
 Hi, When trying to update to pro tools 10.3.7 I get to the software
 updates screen after the software update check upon pro tools startup 
 told
 me a new version was out and there was that link you select after you
 press the get updates button that says internal link it is a red orange
 errow and I get one of two options either the 10.3.7 or the paid 11.0
 update but when the 10.3.7 update is selected I am not able to find the
 download links for it no matter what I try.  I have tried this process on
 both lion and mountain lion and no luck.  I also talked to people at the
 Guitar Center and they suggested I call Avid about possibley remoting 
 into
 my system once I buy the upgrade to transfer the ilok license my question
 is is that process of getting them into your computer accessible and how
 can I access this 10.3.7 update as I want to have 10 updated before 
 buying
 11?  Nick Gawronski
 On 1/1/2014 9:10 AM, studiojay wrote:
 HHi Slau and every one, First of all, let me wish everyone on the list a
 very happy new year. Slau, thanks so much for a super Christmas and new
 year gift. I am really amazed at how much more of the program that is
 accessible now. The channel strip plug-in is amazing. Really appreciate
 every thing that's being done
 JasonTuesday, December 31, 2013 3:05:15 PM UTC-4, Slau Halatyn wrote:
 Thanks, Byron, but none of this would've happened without the foresight
 of key people at Digidesign and avid as well as Apple. There will be an
 opportunity for the community at large to help take it up a notch as
 well. More to come soon.
 
 Best,
 
 Slau
 
 On Dec 31, 2013, at 5:49 AM, byron harden stico...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 hello all.
 
 i would like to publicly thank slau  for all of the hard work.
 
 it is paying off.
 
 chers to a great humanbing,
 On Dec 27, 2013, at 4:05 PM, Gordon Kent dbm...@cybernex.net wrote:
 
 This is good news.  I was actually playing around a bit last night 
 with
 the pro remote app for the iphone and pt10.  It does give you a lot of
 stuff and you can do things like mix automation and select regions and
 run the transport.  I haven’t figured out how to get at inserts and
 sends in the mix view yet.  I should try it on the iPad instead 
 because
 it would fit a lot more at once.  You can run four instances of it to
 handle 32 tracks at once.  If I could get it to take the whole screen
 on the iPad i imagine I could get at a lot of stuff.  You do get 
 values
 for everything, and PT responds quickly to your commands.  It’s a bit
 quirky getting it to connect to your wifi network sometimes but once 
 it
 is on it works wherever you go.  I want to try it with braille so that
 I can do vocals and stuff with no speech going.
 Gord
 On Dec 27, 2013, at 3:59 PM, Slau Halatyn slauh...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 As many of you will recall, I practically threw

Re: FYI Pro Tools 11.1 is now available.

[Matt Diemert]

Any chance someone could share the setup file? I have the 11.2, but when I 
check for update it's not finding any other updates! I have the I locked 11 
bundle license and installed on my I lock! Just need to set up for the 11.one.

Sent from my iPhone

 On Dec 28, 2013, at 3:16 AM, J. R. Westmoreland j...@jrw.org wrote:
 
 Very neat. I have to look into this. That is, if I can keep my iPad behaving 
 correctly. I tried using an app whose name I don't remember right now with an 
 older version of PT and it worked a bit but not as well as I'd hoped.
 Thanks Gordon, this is great news. We love that braille, yes?
 
 Best,
 J. R.
 
 
 On Dec 27, 2013, at 3:05 PM, Gordon Kent dbmu...@cybernex.net wrote:
 
 This is good news.  I was actually playing around a bit last night with the 
 pro remote app for the iphone and pt10.  It does give you a lot of stuff and 
 you can do things like mix automation and select regions and run the 
 transport.  I haven’t figured out how to get at inserts and sends in the mix 
 view yet.  I should try it on the iPad instead because it would fit a lot 
 more at once.  You can run four instances of it to handle 32 tracks at once. 
  If I could get it to take the whole screen on the iPad i imagine I could 
 get at a lot of stuff.  You do get values for everything, and PT responds 
 quickly to your commands.  It’s a bit quirky getting it to connect to your 
 wifi network sometimes but once it is on it works wherever you go.  I want 
 to try it with braille so that I can do vocals and stuff with no speech 
 going.
 Gord
 On Dec 27, 2013, at 3:59 PM, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 As many of you will recall, I practically threw in the towel a couple of 
 months ago. As it turned out, there were programmers turning wheels without 
 my knowledge. When I was made aware of this, frankly, it was a bit of a 
 surprise. Actually, there are things in the works now that will bring even 
 more improvements in the next release. I'm not supposed to say yet but, if 
 all goes according to plan, I believe the next two releases will bring us 
 to as close as full access as we can get. Very exciting times.
 
 slau
 
 On Dec 27, 2013, at 3:02 PM, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 This is great, thanks to all who have been behind the seens to continue to 
 carry this torch mile after mile, and big thanks to Slau who has put in 
 only God knows how much energy to keep this on the board as a extremely 
 viable option for blind producers and musicians.
 - Original Message -
 From: Slau Halatyn
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Friday, December 27, 2013 8:41 AM
 Subject: Re: FYI Pro Tools 11.1 is now available.
 
 The fixes mentioned sound pretty obscure when they're worded in that 
 fashion but, for what it's worth, there are a ton of fixes not the least 
 of which is access to plug-ins unlike that which we had in the past. I'd 
 love to list all of the improvements but there are so many that it would 
 be difficult.
 
 Best,
 
 Slau
 
 On Dec 27, 2013, at 9:55 AM, matt diemert mcdiem...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Also, for those interested 10.3.8 was released Monday as well.
 Grabbing it now to determine if there are any useful upgrades. I
 ordered my pt 11 Upgrade just now, but have to wait until eye balls
 are around for iLock purposes!
 
 
 On 12/27/13, Chris Norman chris.norm...@googlemail.com wrote:
 That's pretty amazing.
 
 I'll be tapping that when I've got another mac! :-)
 
 Have fun all, and hope you all had a merry christmas etc.
 
 On 27/12/2013 14:42, matt diemert wrote:
 Here is a list of accessibility fixes that I found on a forum.
 Certainly not saying this is exhaustive, but It's all I've been able
 to track down thus far!
 ◾PTSW-184656: AudioSuite window now includes Plug-In name.
 ◾PTSW-180095: Added Applescript support for the “Save Session Copy”
 command.
 ◾PTSW-180085: Improved support for Nudge values with the VoiceOver
 accessibility option in OSX.
 ◾PTSW-180084: Improved support for memory locations with the VoiceOver
 accessibility option in OSX.
 ◾PTSW-180083: Improved support for the Click II plug-in with the
 VoiceOver accessibility option in OSX.
 ◾PTSW-180082: Improved support for Memory Locations with the VoiceOver
 accessibility option in OSX.
 ◾PTSW-180080: Improved support for window configurations with the
 VoiceOver accessibility option in OSX.
 ◾PTSW-189731: Improved support for track selector, preset selection,
 and automation controls from within plug-in windows with the VoiceOver
 accessibility option in OSX.
 ◾PTSW-180081: Improved support for Delete Unused Playlist dialogs with
 the VoiceOver accessibility option in OSX.
 ◾PTSW-180078: Improved support for Beat Detective with the VoiceOver
 accessibility option in OSX
 
 
 On 12/27/13, Dread Beat Dadz dreadbeatd...@gmail.com wrote:
 This is the update with the accessibility improvements. I have not 
 gotten
 a
 
 chance to play around with it extensively, but at first glance it does

Re: FYI Pro Tools 11.1 is now available.

[Matt Diemert]

 Same garbage!

Sent from my iPhone

 On Dec 28, 2013, at 10:23 AM, Chris Norman chris.norm...@googlemail.com 
 wrote:
 
 How are we on iLok accessibility?
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
 On 28 Dec 2013, at 12:59, Matt Diemert mcdiem...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Any chance someone could share the setup file? I have the 11.2, but when I 
 check for update it's not finding any other updates! I have the I locked 11 
 bundle license and installed on my I lock! Just need to set up for the 
 11.one.
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
 On Dec 28, 2013, at 3:16 AM, J. R. Westmoreland j...@jrw.org wrote:
 
 Very neat. I have to look into this. That is, if I can keep my iPad 
 behaving correctly. I tried using an app whose name I don't remember right 
 now with an older version of PT and it worked a bit but not as well as I'd 
 hoped.
 Thanks Gordon, this is great news. We love that braille, yes?
 
 Best,
 J. R.
 
 
 On Dec 27, 2013, at 3:05 PM, Gordon Kent dbmu...@cybernex.net wrote:
 
 This is good news.  I was actually playing around a bit last night with 
 the pro remote app for the iphone and pt10.  It does give you a lot of 
 stuff and you can do things like mix automation and select regions and run 
 the transport.  I haven’t figured out how to get at inserts and sends in 
 the mix view yet.  I should try it on the iPad instead because it would 
 fit a lot more at once.  You can run four instances of it to handle 32 
 tracks at once.  If I could get it to take the whole screen on the iPad i 
 imagine I could get at a lot of stuff.  You do get values for everything, 
 and PT responds quickly to your commands.  It’s a bit quirky getting it to 
 connect to your wifi network sometimes but once it is on it works wherever 
 you go.  I want to try it with braille so that I can do vocals and stuff 
 with no speech going.
 Gord
 On Dec 27, 2013, at 3:59 PM, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 As many of you will recall, I practically threw in the towel a couple of 
 months ago. As it turned out, there were programmers turning wheels 
 without my knowledge. When I was made aware of this, frankly, it was a 
 bit of a surprise. Actually, there are things in the works now that will 
 bring even more improvements in the next release. I'm not supposed to say 
 yet but, if all goes according to plan, I believe the next two releases 
 will bring us to as close as full access as we can get. Very exciting 
 times.
 
 slau
 
 On Dec 27, 2013, at 3:02 PM, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 This is great, thanks to all who have been behind the seens to continue 
 to carry this torch mile after mile, and big thanks to Slau who has put 
 in only God knows how much energy to keep this on the board as a 
 extremely viable option for blind producers and musicians.
 - Original Message -
 From: Slau Halatyn
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Friday, December 27, 2013 8:41 AM
 Subject: Re: FYI Pro Tools 11.1 is now available.
 
 The fixes mentioned sound pretty obscure when they're worded in that 
 fashion but, for what it's worth, there are a ton of fixes not the least 
 of which is access to plug-ins unlike that which we had in the past. I'd 
 love to list all of the improvements but there are so many that it would 
 be difficult.
 
 Best,
 
 Slau
 
 On Dec 27, 2013, at 9:55 AM, matt diemert mcdiem...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Also, for those interested 10.3.8 was released Monday as well.
 Grabbing it now to determine if there are any useful upgrades. I
 ordered my pt 11 Upgrade just now, but have to wait until eye balls
 are around for iLock purposes!
 
 
 On 12/27/13, Chris Norman chris.norm...@googlemail.com wrote:
 That's pretty amazing.
 
 I'll be tapping that when I've got another mac! :-)
 
 Have fun all, and hope you all had a merry christmas etc.
 
 On 27/12/2013 14:42, matt diemert wrote:
 Here is a list of accessibility fixes that I found on a forum.
 Certainly not saying this is exhaustive, but It's all I've been able
 to track down thus far!
 ◾PTSW-184656: AudioSuite window now includes Plug-In name.
 ◾PTSW-180095: Added Applescript support for the “Save Session Copy”
 command.
 ◾PTSW-180085: Improved support for Nudge values with the VoiceOver
 accessibility option in OSX.
 ◾PTSW-180084: Improved support for memory locations with the VoiceOver
 accessibility option in OSX.
 ◾PTSW-180083: Improved support for the Click II plug-in with the
 VoiceOver accessibility option in OSX.
 ◾PTSW-180082: Improved support for Memory Locations with the VoiceOver
 accessibility option in OSX.
 ◾PTSW-180080: Improved support for window configurations with the
 VoiceOver accessibility option in OSX.
 ◾PTSW-189731: Improved support for track selector, preset selection,
 and automation controls from within plug-in windows with the VoiceOver
 accessibility option in OSX.
 ◾PTSW-180081: Improved support for Delete Unused Playlist dialogs with
 the VoiceOver accessibility option in OSX.
 ◾PTSW-180078: Improved support for Beat Detective

Re: FYI Pro Tools 11.1 is now available.

[Matt Diemert]

Looks like Proremote all one word. Light and pro versions 

Sent from my iPhone

 On Dec 28, 2013, at 5:51 PM, J. R. Westmoreland j...@jrw.org wrote:
 
 Gordon
  
 I can’t find the app on the app store. Is it there? What is the exact name?
  
 J. R.
  
  
  
 From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf 
 Of Gordon Kent
 Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2013 2:33 PM
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Subject: Re: FYI Pro Tools 11.1 is now available.
  
 Yeah, I thik it may have potential.  There’s just so much stuff around now to 
 play around with that it’s hard to cover all of it and still get real work 
 done.  I’ll have to bring the iPad over to the studio and install the app on 
 it to give it a try.  I have a focus 40 blue that I can pair up the ipad to.  
 THe tricky thing is that I’ll have to remember to turn blue tooth off on the 
 mac then.  I could use the braille note but it doesn’t have the whiz wheels 
 and all the navigation stuff the focus has.  I have that real little one, the 
 braille pen, that is only 12 characters but does have a nifty joy stick but I 
 thik the 40 character display is the way to go.
 Gord
 On Dec 28, 2013, at 3:16 AM, J. R. Westmoreland j...@jrw.org wrote:
 
 
 Very neat. I have to look into this. That is, if I can keep my iPad behaving 
 correctly. I tried using an app whose name I don't remember right now with an 
 older version of PT and it worked a bit but not as well as I'd hoped.
 Thanks Gordon, this is great news. We love that braille, yes?
  
 Best,
 J. R.
  
  
 On Dec 27, 2013, at 3:05 PM, Gordon Kent dbmu...@cybernex.net wrote:
 
 
 This is good news.  I was actually playing around a bit last night with the 
 pro remote app for the iphone and pt10.  It does give you a lot of stuff and 
 you can do things like mix automation and select regions and run the 
 transport.  I haven’t figured out how to get at inserts and sends in the mix 
 view yet.  I should try it on the iPad instead because it would fit a lot 
 more at once.  You can run four instances of it to handle 32 tracks at once.  
 If I could get it to take the whole screen on the iPad i imagine I could get 
 at a lot of stuff.  You do get values for everything, and PT responds quickly 
 to your commands.  It’s a bit quirky getting it to connect to your wifi 
 network sometimes but once it is on it works wherever you go.  I want to try 
 it with braille so that I can do vocals and stuff with no speech going.
 Gord
 On Dec 27, 2013, at 3:59 PM, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 
 As many of you will recall, I practically threw in the towel a couple of 
 months ago. As it turned out, there were programmers turning wheels without 
 my knowledge. When I was made aware of this, frankly, it was a bit of a 
 surprise. Actually, there are things in the works now that will bring even 
 more improvements in the next release. I'm not supposed to say yet but, if 
 all goes according to plan, I believe the next two releases will bring us to 
 as close as full access as we can get. Very exciting times.
  
 slau
  
 On Dec 27, 2013, at 3:02 PM, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 
 This is great, thanks to all who have been behind the seens to continue to 
 carry this torch mile after mile, and big thanks to Slau who has put in only 
 God knows how much energy to keep this on the board as a extremely viable 
 option for blind producers and musicians.
 - Original Message -
 From: Slau Halatyn
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Friday, December 27, 2013 8:41 AM
 Subject: Re: FYI Pro Tools 11.1 is now available.
  
 The fixes mentioned sound pretty obscure when they're worded in that fashion 
 but, for what it's worth, there are a ton of fixes not the least of which is 
 access to plug-ins unlike that which we had in the past. I'd love to list all 
 of the improvements but there are so many that it would be difficult.
  
 Best,
  
 Slau
  
 On Dec 27, 2013, at 9:55 AM, matt diemert mcdiem...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 
 Also, for those interested 10.3.8 was released Monday as well.
 Grabbing it now to determine if there are any useful upgrades. I
 ordered my pt 11 Upgrade just now, but have to wait until eye balls
 are around for iLock purposes!
 
 
 On 12/27/13, Chris Norman chris.norm...@googlemail.com wrote:
 
 That's pretty amazing.
 
 I'll be tapping that when I've got another mac! :-)
 
 Have fun all, and hope you all had a merry christmas etc.
 
 On 27/12/2013 14:42, matt diemert wrote:
 
 Here is a list of accessibility fixes that I found on a forum.
 Certainly not saying this is exhaustive, but It's all I've been able
 to track down thus far!
 ◾PTSW-184656: AudioSuite window now includes Plug-In name.
 ◾PTSW-180095: Added Applescript support for the “Save Session Copy”
 command.
 ◾PTSW-180085: Improved support for Nudge values with the VoiceOver
 accessibility option in OSX.
 ◾PTSW-180084: Improved support for memory locations with the VoiceOver
 accessibility

Re: FYI Pro Tools 11.1 is now available.

[matt diemert]

Here is a list of accessibility fixes that I found on a forum.
Certainly not saying this is exhaustive, but It's all I've been able
to track down thus far!
◾PTSW-184656: AudioSuite window now includes Plug-In name.
◾PTSW-180095: Added Applescript support for the “Save Session Copy” command.
◾PTSW-180085: Improved support for Nudge values with the VoiceOver
accessibility option in OSX.
◾PTSW-180084: Improved support for memory locations with the VoiceOver
accessibility option in OSX.
◾PTSW-180083: Improved support for the Click II plug-in with the
VoiceOver accessibility option in OSX.
◾PTSW-180082: Improved support for Memory Locations with the VoiceOver
accessibility option in OSX.
◾PTSW-180080: Improved support for window configurations with the
VoiceOver accessibility option in OSX.
◾PTSW-189731: Improved support for track selector, preset selection,
and automation controls from within plug-in windows with the VoiceOver
accessibility option in OSX.
◾PTSW-180081: Improved support for Delete Unused Playlist dialogs with
the VoiceOver accessibility option in OSX.
◾PTSW-180078: Improved support for Beat Detective with the VoiceOver
accessibility option in OSX


On 12/27/13, Dread Beat Dadz dreadbeatd...@gmail.com wrote:
 This is the update with the accessibility improvements. I have not gotten a

 chance to play around with it extensively, but at first glance it does seem

 to be more accessible than 11.0.3. The update was release on 12/23/2013.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



-- 
Warm Regards:
Matt Diemert
330-980-0046

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: FYI Pro Tools 11.1 is now available.

[matt diemert]

Also, for those interested 10.3.8 was released Monday as well.
Grabbing it now to determine if there are any useful upgrades. I
ordered my pt 11 Upgrade just now, but have to wait until eye balls
are around for iLock purposes!


On 12/27/13, Chris Norman chris.norm...@googlemail.com wrote:
 That's pretty amazing.

 I'll be tapping that when I've got another mac! :-)

 Have fun all, and hope you all had a merry christmas etc.

 On 27/12/2013 14:42, matt diemert wrote:
 Here is a list of accessibility fixes that I found on a forum.
 Certainly not saying this is exhaustive, but It's all I've been able
 to track down thus far!
 ◾PTSW-184656: AudioSuite window now includes Plug-In name.
 ◾PTSW-180095: Added Applescript support for the “Save Session Copy”
 command.
 ◾PTSW-180085: Improved support for Nudge values with the VoiceOver
 accessibility option in OSX.
 ◾PTSW-180084: Improved support for memory locations with the VoiceOver
 accessibility option in OSX.
 ◾PTSW-180083: Improved support for the Click II plug-in with the
 VoiceOver accessibility option in OSX.
 ◾PTSW-180082: Improved support for Memory Locations with the VoiceOver
 accessibility option in OSX.
 ◾PTSW-180080: Improved support for window configurations with the
 VoiceOver accessibility option in OSX.
 ◾PTSW-189731: Improved support for track selector, preset selection,
 and automation controls from within plug-in windows with the VoiceOver
 accessibility option in OSX.
 ◾PTSW-180081: Improved support for Delete Unused Playlist dialogs with
 the VoiceOver accessibility option in OSX.
 ◾PTSW-180078: Improved support for Beat Detective with the VoiceOver
 accessibility option in OSX


 On 12/27/13, Dread Beat Dadz dreadbeatd...@gmail.com wrote:
 This is the update with the accessibility improvements. I have not gotten
 a

 chance to play around with it extensively, but at first glance it does
 seem

 to be more accessible than 11.0.3. The update was release on 12/23/2013.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



-- 
Warm Regards:
Matt Diemert
330-980-0046

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: FYI Pro Tools 11.1 is now available.

[matt diemert]

I'm assuming there is no demo of 11.1 as of yet. looks like 11.0.2 is
the latest demo.

On 12/27/13, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:
 This is great, thanks to all who have been behind the seens to continue to
 carry this torch mile after mile, and big thanks to Slau who has put in only
 God knows how much energy to keep this on the board as a extremely viable
 option for blind producers and musicians.
   - Original Message -
   From: Slau Halatyn
   To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
   Sent: Friday, December 27, 2013 8:41 AM
   Subject: Re: FYI Pro Tools 11.1 is now available.


   The fixes mentioned sound pretty obscure when they're worded in that
 fashion but, for what it's worth, there are a ton of fixes not the least of
 which is access to plug-ins unlike that which we had in the past. I'd love
 to list all of the improvements but there are so many that it would be
 difficult.


   Best,


   Slau


   On Dec 27, 2013, at 9:55 AM, matt diemert mcdiem...@gmail.com wrote:


 Also, for those interested 10.3.8 was released Monday as well.
 Grabbing it now to determine if there are any useful upgrades. I
 ordered my pt 11 Upgrade just now, but have to wait until eye balls
 are around for iLock purposes!


 On 12/27/13, Chris Norman chris.norm...@googlemail.com wrote:

   That's pretty amazing.

   I'll be tapping that when I've got another mac! :-)

   Have fun all, and hope you all had a merry christmas etc.

   On 27/12/2013 14:42, matt diemert wrote:

 Here is a list of accessibility fixes that I found on a forum.
 Certainly not saying this is exhaustive, but It's all I've been
 able
 to track down thus far!
 ◾PTSW-184656: AudioSuite window now includes Plug-In name.
 ◾PTSW-180095: Added Applescript support for the “Save Session Copy”
 command.
 ◾PTSW-180085: Improved support for Nudge values with the VoiceOver
 accessibility option in OSX.
 ◾PTSW-180084: Improved support for memory locations with the
 VoiceOver
 accessibility option in OSX.
 ◾PTSW-180083: Improved support for the Click II plug-in with the
 VoiceOver accessibility option in OSX.
 ◾PTSW-180082: Improved support for Memory Locations with the
 VoiceOver
 accessibility option in OSX.
 ◾PTSW-180080: Improved support for window configurations with the
 VoiceOver accessibility option in OSX.
 ◾PTSW-189731: Improved support for track selector, preset
 selection,
 and automation controls from within plug-in windows with the
 VoiceOver
 accessibility option in OSX.
 ◾PTSW-180081: Improved support for Delete Unused Playlist dialogs
 with
 the VoiceOver accessibility option in OSX.
 ◾PTSW-180078: Improved support for Beat Detective with the
 VoiceOver
 accessibility option in OSX


 On 12/27/13, Dread Beat Dadz dreadbeatd...@gmail.com wrote:

   This is the update with the accessibility improvements. I have not
 gotten
   a

   chance to play around with it extensively, but at first glance it
 does
   seem

   to be more accessible than 11.0.3. The update was release on
 12/23/2013.

   --
   You received this message because you are subscribed to the
 Google
   Groups
   Pro Tools Accessibility group.
   To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
 send
   an
   email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
   For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.





   --
   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups
   Pro Tools Accessibility group.
   To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an
   email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
   For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




 --
 Warm Regards:
 Matt Diemert
 330-980-0046

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an email toptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



   --
   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
   To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
   For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com

Re: My cd has been released

[Matt Diemert]

Not at all!  For spotify users it's there as well! 

Sent from my iPhone

 On Dec 19, 2013, at 11:47 AM, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Matt, do you mind if I share this on another blind music related list?
 - Original Message - From: matt diemert mcdiem...@gmail.com
 To: ptaccess ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 9:11 AM
 Subject: My cd has been released
 
 
 Hi all,
 Appologize for the shameless promotion here, but I recently released
 my first EP sunday morning to iTunes, as well as various digital
 distributors.  This CD was recorded, edited, and mixed by me, with
 ProTools 10, with the Waves bundle plug ins using voiceover, and at
 times an alpha track for plugs and automation.  If any of you would
 like to check out the sample tracks in iTunes, it can be found at:
 https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/sunday-morning-ep/id784841753
 
 While I have done much of this type work in the past, it was always
 with lower end gear, and DAW's, so I'd be interested in any feedback
 you folks have.
 Take care.
 
 -- 
 Warm Regards:
 Matt Diemert
 330-980-0046
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: My cd has been released

[matt diemert]

The clips seem considerabley shorter here but,


http://www.amazon.com/Sunday-Morning-Matthew-Diemert/dp/B00HE5R9X0/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8qid=1387386972sr=8-1keywords=matthew+diemert+sunday+morning





On 12/18/13, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:
 I'm trying to pull it up on Itunes, but it always gives me trouble on this
 PC. Is it on Amazon at all? I may try on the mac later on.
 - Original Message -
 From: matt diemert mcdiem...@gmail.com
 To: ptaccess ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 9:11 AM
 Subject: My cd has been released


 Hi all,
 Appologize for the shameless promotion here, but I recently released
 my first EP sunday morning to iTunes, as well as various digital
 distributors.  This CD was recorded, edited, and mixed by me, with
 ProTools 10, with the Waves bundle plug ins using voiceover, and at
 times an alpha track for plugs and automation.  If any of you would
 like to check out the sample tracks in iTunes, it can be found at:
 https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/sunday-morning-ep/id784841753

 While I have done much of this type work in the past, it was always
 with lower end gear, and DAW's, so I'd be interested in any feedback
 you folks have.
 Take care.

 --
 Warm Regards:
 Matt Diemert
 330-980-0046

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an

 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



-- 
Warm Regards:
Matt Diemert
330-980-0046

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: My cd has been released

[Matt Diemert]

Yes, www.cdbaby.com  handled it! It was $49 for digital distribution, I 
submitted it Monday night and they had it already to go by late last night! 
Well worth the money in my opinion.

Sent from my iPhone

 On Dec 18, 2013, at 6:19 PM, Gabe Vega - CEO Commtech LLC 
 theblindt...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 I'm just curious but what company did you use for all the stores digital 
 distribution? Did one company take care of all the stores for you? Any info 
 you could provide will be great please appreciate it.
 
 Gabe Vega  - CEO
 Commtech LLC
 The leader of computer support, training and web development services
 Web: http://commtechusa.net
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/commtechllc
 Facebook: http://facebook.com/commtechllc
 Email: i...@commtechusa.net
 Phone: (888) 351-5289 Ext. 710
 Fax: (480) 535-7649
 
 On Dec 18, 2013, at 12:23 PM, matt diemert mcdiem...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 The clips seem considerabley shorter here but,
 
 
 http://www.amazon.com/Sunday-Morning-Matthew-Diemert/dp/B00HE5R9X0/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8qid=1387386972sr=8-1keywords=matthew+diemert+sunday+morning
 
 
 
 
 
 On 12/18/13, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:
 I'm trying to pull it up on Itunes, but it always gives me trouble on this
 PC. Is it on Amazon at all? I may try on the mac later on.
 - Original Message -
 From: matt diemert mcdiem...@gmail.com
 To: ptaccess ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 9:11 AM
 Subject: My cd has been released
 
 
 Hi all,
 Appologize for the shameless promotion here, but I recently released
 my first EP sunday morning to iTunes, as well as various digital
 distributors.  This CD was recorded, edited, and mixed by me, with
 ProTools 10, with the Waves bundle plug ins using voiceover, and at
 times an alpha track for plugs and automation.  If any of you would
 like to check out the sample tracks in iTunes, it can be found at:
 https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/sunday-morning-ep/id784841753
 
 While I have done much of this type work in the past, it was always
 with lower end gear, and DAW's, so I'd be interested in any feedback
 you folks have.
 Take care.
 
 --
 Warm Regards:
 Matt Diemert
 330-980-0046
 
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
 -- 
 Warm Regards:
 Matt Diemert
 330-980-0046
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Editing questions

[Matt Diemert]

If the audio is at the very becoming of a track, easiest way to do this is 
press play, and drop a down arrow right where the audio that you do want 
begins. You may need to nudge around to be precise with this point. Press shift 
enter to select from where you dropped your down arrow back to the top of the 
track. At this point you can listen to your selection or press delete to get 
rid of it. Hope this helps. 

Sent from my iPhone

 On Dec 17, 2013, at 9:25 AM, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Hi John,
 
 First, you'll have to make sure that the checkbox under the Operations tab of 
 Pro Tools preferences is set for insertion to follow scrub. Also, check the 
 box for audio during fast forward and rewind. Under the main menu bar, make 
 sure to check the option for linking track selection and edit selection.
 
 Now, make sure you have a track selected. At least once from the time you 
 open the session, you'll need for there to be an insertion point or cursor 
 created within that track If you have a control surface with a scrub wheel, 
 simply engaging the scrub function will automatically create an insertion 
 cursor. If you're not using a surface, use shuttle mode or just fast forward 
 for a moment. All of these actions will create an insertion point within the 
 track. Once you've done that, you don't have to do it again.
 
 There are so many ways to edit audio that it's difficult to encapsulate but, 
 for starters, you have 4 modes which are Shuffle, Slip, Spot and Grid. 99.9% 
 of the time you'll either use Shuffle or Slip. The names are somewhat vague. 
 Shuffle means if you cut or delete a region or clip, the audio that follows 
 it will move up by the amount you've cut or deleted. Slip mode means all of 
 the audio that follows what you've cut or deleted stays exactly where it 
 originally was.
 
 There is, of course, the technique of using down and up arrows during 
 playback to select a range and then cut or delete. For this to work well, you 
 have to make sure the insertion is not following playback in the Pro Tools 
 preferences. Control-n toggles this setting.
 
 Other than that,, Command-e splits regions. Tab and Option-Tab moves forward 
 or backward to the next region boundary. Using Shift along with the previous 
 shortcuts makes a selection.
 
 Those are the most basic things to remember. It can get a whole lot more 
 complex but that should get you going.
 
 Slau
 
 On Dec 17, 2013, at 8:12 AM, John Gunn g...@tznet.com wrote:
 
 Hello All,
 
 I recorded from a tape and about 5 seconds of dead air.
 
 I want to select that area then delete/clear.
 
 So far I have had no luck.  Can someone give me directions and what I need 
 to keep checked and unchecked under options ETC.
 
 John
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

AD drums

[matt diemert]

Does anyone know if there is a demo out there for addictive drums?
I've looked all over the web site, and don't see one, but have seen
mention of one here and on other groups.
Thanks.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Instrument Track

[matt diemert]

Speaking of instrument tracks, I've never had reason to use these
before, but I have interest in trying this out. What do I need to use
the virtual instruments in PT 10?  Do I need some sort of external
midi keyboard? If so, what do folks recommend? How accessible is this
type of tracking in PT? THanks for any guidance you all can offer.


On 10/21/13, Christopher-Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:
 I never could get boom to work.  Is it like XPand2 in that I can simply
 select a kit, then just arm the track and play?  Apparently, it's not quite

 that easy.

 Chris.


 Visit my Audioboo page for freely available music which I have recorded.

 http://www.audioboo.fm/chrisgilland

 For updates to my Audioboo page, you also are more than welcome to follow me

 on Twitter.

 http://www.twitter.com/clgillandmusic
 - Original Message -
 From: Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 6:34 PM
 Subject: Re: Instrument Track


 The bulk of all the sounds are going to be under the Expand instrument
 plugin. For drums, both the expand has drums as well as the boom plugin.
 With each instrument selection you have dozens of settings to change the
 sounds to your own taist.
 HTH
 - Original Message -
 From: g...@tznet.com
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 12:39 PM
 Subject: Instrument Track


 Hello All,

 As the subject states, I know how to create an instrment track being
 stereo
 ETC but need some suggestions choosing one.

 Last week a friend of mine showed me the Hammon B3 and what a sound.

 Again any thoughts or suggestions will be appreciated and thanks.

 John

 
 mail2web - Check your email from the web at
 http://mail2web.com/ .


 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an

 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an

 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



-- 
Warm Regards:
Matt Diemert
330-980-0046

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Pro Tools 10.3.7 Help

[Matt Diemert]

Yes, I am using version 10 and it works perfectly here was just using it to set 
up a project!

Sent from my iPhone

 On Oct 16, 2013, at 12:12 PM, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 I believe so, it does in 9.
 - Original Message - From: g...@tznet.com
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 8:03 AM
 Subject: Re: Pro Tools 10.3.7 Help
 
 
 Thanks much all but I know Nate you are us ing 8 so my question, does this
 still apply in 10?
 
 
 
 Original email:
 -
 From: Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com
 Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 08:03:00 -0800
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Subject: Re: Pro Tools 10.3.7 Help
 
 
 Didn't know that about transport, thanks.
 - Original Message - From: Matt Diemert mcdiem...@gmail.com
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 7:55 AM
 Subject: Re: Pro Tools 10.3.7 Help
 
 
 Also, its command 1 for transport if i am not mistaken. alternatively,
 you
 can also use the keystrokes the Papa mentioned.s
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
 On Oct 16, 2013, at 11:53 AM, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
 Hey buddy, you can turn off the click track by pressing 7 on the number
 pad and the count in I believe by pressing 8 on the pad as well. Let me
 know if this is what you needed help with.
 - Original Message - From: g...@tznet.com
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 6:19 AM
 Subject: Pro Tools 10.3.7 Help
 
 
 Hello All,
 
 In Pro Tools 10.3.7 how does one turn off count-in as well turning off
 click track?
 
 A friend of mine sent me some audio tracks and never used click track or
 count-in.
 
 When trying to access keyboard shortcuts for whatever reason I am not
 seeing them, any thoughts?
 
 John
 
 
 mail2web - Check your email from the web at
 http://mail2web.com/ .
 
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
 
 mail2web - Check your email from the web at
 http://mail2web.com/ .
 
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Lost a track in a paid session yesterday

[matt diemert]

 it, most clients I have had
 haven't cared about tying peaces of good takes together to get the
 best
 of
 all the takes, but I would still like to get a better handle on this
 so
 I
 can block up that chink in my armor.
   Thanks all over for any thoughts
   --
   You received this message because you are subscribed to the
 Google
 Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
   To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
 it,
 send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
   For more options, visit
 https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
 send
 an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

   --
   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
   To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
 send
 an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
   For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



-- 
Warm Regards:
Matt Diemert
330-980-0046

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Lost a track in a paid session yesterday

[Matt Diemert]

I can certainly see how that could be helpful to some, but since I'm very 
specific with my names I don't even pay attention to the number the voiceover 
reads when going through the playlist manager. I name so specifically that in 
my notes I can write down exactly which playlist I may have like a course 
OraVerse from.

Sent from my iPhone

 On Oct 2, 2013, at 10:28 AM, Scott Chesworth scottcheswo...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 I take a slightly different approach. If it's a track I know I'll use
 playlists on, I usually leave the first playlist blank and comp onto
 that. Main reason being that when PT assigns numbers to playlists,
 then the playlist numbers PT adds on stay in sync with the number of
 the take. For some reason, I find that helps me to keep track of stuff
 a little easier.
 
 Hth
 
 Scott
 
 On 10/2/13, matt diemert mcdiem...@gmail.com wrote:
 Absolutely, Working with the play lists allows two things, you can
 keep focus on the play list in the edit window, and use the track
 table in the mix window to quickly select tracks. My favorite feature
 of PT on a mac is being able to keep focus in two different windows!
 It's extremely easy to quickly create a new PL between takes to give
 who evers singing or playing a breath, at the end I create a new blank
 play list, called comped, and once I've comped it, I duplicate it, and
 do my fades/cross fades etc, this insures if I don't like a fade, I
 can go back to the original comped track.
 
 On 10/2/13, Scott Chesworth scottcheswo...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hmmm, I dunno man, when I'm already dealing with sessions that have
 high enough track counts as to feel cumbersome, adding a new one for
 each take doesn't seem to improve the workflow all that much here, it
 just delays the inevitable. I'd probably end up doing even more button
 bashing comping the best stuff together from multiple tracks versus
 multiple playlists. A lot of the time I'm comping with the artist
 present now rather than doing it on my own time, so the button bashing
 is bad no matter what stage it comes at.
 
 On 10/2/13, TheOreoMonster monkeypushe...@gmail.com wrote:
 yeah, you can, but i pretty much live in the track list table and use
 the
 Shift+a shortcut a lot to arm or unarm tracks. So its quick to unarm,
 move
 to the next and arm.
 On Oct 1, 2013, at 8:34 PM, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 So you creat a new track for each full take? That's something, I
 imagine
 you could end up with alot of active tracks at some point, but  if it
 works , that's the bottem line.
 - Original Message - From: TheOreoMonster
 monkeypushe...@gmail.com
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 4:23 PM
 Subject: Re: Lost a track in a paid session yesterday
 
 
 That's why i never use playlist. It would slow me down too much to have
 to
 to go cycle through them in that manner. can create 5 new tracks at
 once
 and cycle through rename as we do a take  all quickly in the edit
 window
 and if they aren't adjacent or contiguous item chooser can be useful. I
 keep notes and comp the takes down to one track before mix time so i
 don't
 end up with too many tracks then.
 On Oct 1, 2013, at 7:57 PM, Scott Chesworth scottcheswo...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
 Ooh la la, I didn't know that keystroke existed to create new and
 duplicate playlists. Cool!
 
 Does anyone know whether there are keystrokes to cycle through
 playlists on the selected track? At the moment, I do this by going to
 the edit window, interacting with the track and popping the playlist
 selector menu, so a keystroke would save untold amounts of button
 bashing here.
 
 Cheers
 
 Scott
 
 On 10/1/13, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:
 I figur that I'm just paying my Protools dues right now.
 thanks again.
 - Original Message -
 From: Chris Norman
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 9:39 AM
 Subject: Re: Lost a track in a paid session yesterday
 
 
 Oh, they're definitely useful.
 
 I tend to duplicate playlists before I do any distructive editing,
 and
 as
 you say, if you get a really good vocal take. Better to have more
 material
 than you can work with, than to not have enough to tie up the session
 with.
 
 Cheers,
 
 On 01/10/2013 18:44, Poppa Bear wrote:
 
  Thanks for that Chris, the more thoughts I get here, the better I
 understand how to take advantage of the play list feature.
- Original Message -
From: Chris Norman
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 9:33 AM
Subject: Re: Lost a track in a paid session yesterday
 
 
Firstly, chances are, the audio you lost will be in the Audio
 Files
 folder.
 
Secondly, control \ (or whatever that key is in the crook of the
 enter
 key), will make a new playlist, and control command \ (same key),
 makes
 a
 duplicate of the new playlist.
 
Be mindful though, that if you make more than 5 or so playlists,
 the
 oldest ones seem to disappear, and I'm

Re: New user questions

[matt diemert]

 an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


 
 mail2web - Check your email from the web at
 http://mail2web.com/ .


 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



-- 
Warm Regards:
Matt Diemert
330-980-0046

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Awesome keyboard shortcuts

[matt diemert]

Here is a fairly exhaustive list I came across when I was getting
started. I still look back at it from time to time.

http://en.wikiaudio.org/Pro_Tools_10_key_commands_and_short_cuts_list

On 9/26/13, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hey Gary, you find any new tricks that have helped you to move through PT
 quicker?
 Thanks
 - Original Message -
 From: Gary Readfern-Gray readfern.g...@googlemail.com
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2013 5:33 AM
 Subject: Awesome keyboard shortcuts


 OK, so I guess that many of you will know these but I've only just
 discovered the last 3 so I thought I'd help other newbies out.

 Arm or disarm the selected track for recording shift+r
 Mute the selected track Shift+M
 Solo the selected track Shift+S

 But these are killer

 In edit mode.
 p select the previous track
 semicolon select the next track

 In edit or mix mode.
 command+shift+f brings up a dialog where you can select a track by its
 number.

 For me at least that's much quicker then interacting with the track
 list and arrowing to the track I want to mute or solo.

 So there you go, enjoy. Anyone know why p and semicolon don't work in mix

 mode?

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an

 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



-- 
Warm Regards:
Matt Diemert
330-980-0046

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Work in progress

[matt diemert]

Poppa, I've already retracked the drums, but for the heck of it, i'll
try it on the original take just to see.
I played all the instruments and did the Vox on both the songs that
I've sent over well obviously not the female harms!

I did pop the Elec Gut track down 2.2DB right after I bounced it and
sent to list, so I guess we were both thinking the same there.

As for it's pan position. I've tried it three or four spots, and when
listening say in a car, ipod, or on a normal boombox ETC, panned hard
is where it sits best; however, when I listen in my studio with my
studio monitors, I feel like I want to push it back towards the
center. I'll have to think on that one to decide where it ultimately
ends up!
Thanks for the feedback.

As a side note, when I learned PT 9 and 10 back in march, my best
friend who is sighted and has worked with PT in nashville for a number
of years, had me record all of our training. I've contemplated editing
it up and putting it up somewhere for audio references for folks new
to pT and even more advanced concepts that we covered but it's nearly
50 hours of recording, and the man hours it would take to edit and put
it in order seem overwhelming! I'll think about it, and let you guys
know if I decide to throw it up somewhere.

On 9/22/13, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:
 Matt, if you try this, then pleas repost, I would be intrested in the
 affectiveness on this song.
   - Original Message -
   From: CHUCK REICHEL
   To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
   Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2013 3:06 PM
   Subject: Re: Work in progress


   Hi Guys,
   If the drums are giving you trouble!
   Try elastic audio on the drums.
   Then quantize it  to 1/16 notes and then take a listen. :))
   YMMV
   Talk soon


   CHUCK REICHEL
   soundpicturerecord...@gmail.com
   www.SoundPictureRecording.com
   954-742-0019
   Isaiah 26 : 3
Thou wilt keep him in perfect peace, whose mind is stayed on thee:
 because he trusteth in thee.


   In GOD I Trust


   On Sep 22, 2013, at 4:35 PM, Poppa Bear wrote:


 Hello Matt, I took a listen to the mix in my control room. My thoughts
 are still the same, the guitar is panned two much starting in the second
 verse and it is a couple DB too loud. Also, that drum track for the first
 half of the song is not comercial quality in regards to timing, but I think
 you kind of acknowledged that. I still hope to hear more from you, if that
 is your voice, you have the gift that is for sure. One other thing, when it
 comes to panning instraments, if our listening environment isn't acousticly
 balanced to some level of sound/acoustic control it is very dificult to get
 a good feel of how tracks are sitting in the audio field.
 - Original Message - From: matt diemert mcdiem...@gmail.com
 To: ptaccess ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 7:48 AM
 Subject: Work in progress



   Morning all,

   Heres another one I'm working on, just some basic edits and comps on

   this one. Not a lot of mixing yet.

   Feel free to let me know what ya think.




 https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19716872/because%20he%20lives%209-18.mp3



   --

   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.

   To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

   For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




   --
   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
   To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
   For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



-- 
Warm Regards:
Matt Diemert
330-980-0046

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Increasing ram in the Imac?

[matt diemert]

I've upped my quod core i7 MAC mini to 16 gb of ram and deffinitly
note a difference in performance.  I use the item chooser a lot in the
edit windows of PT, and I noticed with the additional ram installed
voiceover is much quicker to the draw when puling up the contents of
the item chooser.


On 9/20/13, Monkey Pusher monkeypushe...@gmail.com wrote:
 btw the other person i referenced earleir was using Logic,  Final Cut
 Pro and lots of oother   similar Pro apps. So depending on what you
 do, while PT can only use up to 8GB. Other apps may benefit from 16 on
 your system now.

 On 9/20/13, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:
 I believe you are right from what I have read. I Haven't thought that far
 ahead though with PT 11 because of the road blocks we are experiencing
 with

 accessibility.
 - Original Message -
 From: Monkey Pusher monkeypushe...@gmail.com
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 10:26 AM
 Subject: Re: Increasing ram in the Imac?


 Does this remain the same with Pro tools 11? I'd imagine since Pro
 Tools 11 is 64 bit,  it could use all 16?

 On 9/20/13, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:
 I just read a little while ago that Protools can't use more than 8GB
 including heavy load plugins. I will let the list know if I make the
 upgrade

 to 8 over the next few weeks.
 - Original Message -
 From: Monkey Pusher monkeypushe...@gmail.com
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 9:01 AM
 Subject: Re: Increasing ram in the Imac?


 Havent done this yet myself as i havent  felt the pinch yet on
 processor power.  Someone i follow on twitter made the jump from 4 to
 16GB though and said they did see marked improovement. That being said
 unlike you two i am running the i7 3.4GHZ version of the 2011 iMac.

 On 9/20/13, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:
 I remember somebody else on here using an Imac I5 quad core. I have
 one
 and
 I am thinking about increasing the stock ram to 8 or 16 GB, but
 wanted
 to
 know if anyone who may have done the same upgrade saw a mesurable
 increase
 in performance.
 Thanks

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
 send
 an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups

 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an

 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups

 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an

 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



-- 
Warm Regards:
Matt Diemert
330-980-0046

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Just mountain lion! please give me advice?

[matt diemert]

, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups

 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an

 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an

 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



-- 
Warm Regards:
Matt Diemert
330-980-0046

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Just mountain lion! please give me advice?

[matt diemert]

Odd, I just did this on both a brand new MacBook air, and a quod core
Mac Mini with 16gb of ram.  Both machines upgraded perfectly.  I
created my USB drive as a bootable drive, and booted to it. Then under
disk utilities, I opted to format my machine, and completed whipped
mountain lion off of the system. Once this was done, I was able to
install lion. Whole process took an hour.


On 9/18/13, Ramy Moustafa moshtaqlealga...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi:
 I tried doing this and my Hardware refused this.


 -Original Message-
 From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On
 Behalf
 Of matt diemert
 Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 11:05 PM
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Subject: Re: Just mountain lion! please give me advice?

 When I purchased my mac brand new it had mountain lion on it. I just
 had a copy of lion on a usb key and I reformatted my mac, and
 installed lion 10.7 instead. I've had no problems whatsoever running
 PT 10 in this method.

 On 9/18/13, Ramy Moustafa moshtaqlealga...@gmail.com wrote:
 What about buying used laptop, will it be ok to use in a studio?

 -Original Message-
 From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On
 Behalf
 Of Poppa Bear
 Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 10:23 PM
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Subject: Re: Just mountain lion! please give me advice?

 Ramy unfortunatlly you are deeling with issues that have been talked
 about
 on here repeedidly over the last year and for anyone else who has not
 dove
 into protools accessibility with the mac, they need to do their research
 on

 OS's, Mac hardware issues and protools versions. Throwing money at these
 issues will not help to change the  problems, once you have the wrong
 products in your hands. It is a hard pill to have to swallow.
 I hope you find a solution never the less. Let us know how it goes.
 - Original Message -
 From: Ramy Moustafa moshtaqlealga...@gmail.com
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 12:04 PM
 Subject: RE: Just mountain lion! please give me advice?


 Hi all:

 Thanks so much for all your replys. But am really in a miss, so any news
 about the new OSX Mavrex? Any ideas if it will fix the Voice over
 problems?
 Really I don't want to sell my mac but what can I do?

 Thanks in advance.


 -Original Message-
 From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On
 Behalf
 Of Poppa Bear
 Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 7:10 PM
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Subject: Re: Just mountain lion! please give me advice?

 The newer macs don't do well with Sonar on Boot Camp, some don't work at
 all. The mack can be a very slippery sloape as time goes on for us in
 the
 blind community of audio recording. Sorry to hear about your problems,
 Ramy,

 I am sure it is very stressful. If you do upgrade for Sonar, check out
 Jim
 Roseberry at www.studiocats.com, for $1300 or so they have a quad core,
 16
 GB ram, I7 with a TB or more, hyper threaded to run as an 8 core machine
 and

 be dedicated for audio recording.
  Original Message -
 From: ramy moustafa moshtaqlealga...@gmail.com
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 6:37 AM
 Subject: Re: Just mountain lion! please give me advice?


 aha thanks so much for your replys. but, even the latest updates to ml
 didn't fix the issue?
 i'm really in trouble and don't know what to do.
 anyway, if you can think with me for a solution please tell me.
 thanks so much

 Ramy moustafa saber
 licturer at:
 faculty of musical education
 music arranger and sound engineer
 Sent from my iPhone

 On Sep 18, 2013, at 2:30 PM, Scott Chesworth scottcheswo...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 They're probably struggling because his Mac Mini was manufactured
 recently, and some of the new hardware won't be supported by Lion. Had
 the same problem here. I got around it by buying a used machine that
 was built when Lion was the latest OS and doing some hardware upgrades
 to bring it up to a spec that runs well with big sessions.

 Dunno what to advise beyond doing the same thing I did really. Even
 then, I only made that move because there was work that relies on me
 being in PT guaranteed. Without that, I can't say I would've bothered
 until the future is a bit more certain.

 Scott

 On 9/18/13, TheOreoMonster monkeypushe...@gmail.com wrote:
 Edit fields won't read at all. FOr example where you go to enter in
 tempo or
 to see what thempo the project is in. What the counters are set to
 etc
 etc.
 I am not sure why your apple store is doing there, but it
 On Sep 18, 2013, at 6:36 AM, Ramy Moustafa
 moshtaqlealga...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Hi all:


 After a week with my apple store here, and after they do all things
 really
 to install Lion on my Mac mini, they failed, in doing this,

 So, my mac mini is with mountain lion, so, what is your advice?

 What are the problems that  I will face when using pro tools  with
 voice
 over?

 I

Re: Work in progress

[matt diemert]

Yes, the drums did faulter just a little there, and we just haven't
had time to set the whole setup to record drums again! Always
deffinitly record to a click, no other way!
 I'm such an LCR guy when it comes to panning, that it's difficult for
me to put things somewhere in the middle. I suppose it's something I
need to get used to, but I always try it somewhere in the middle and
always, always end up panning hard. I've contemplated retracking the
acoustic track with a Martin rather than my Taylor, as it has such a
distinct sound.


On 9/18/13, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:
 Yep, on the solo guitar lyx on the secont verse I would bring the pan closer

 to the senter by maybe 10% and turn it down a DB or two and see how that
 sounds. When that guitar comes in it is so noticeable that it was
 distracting to me. I will take it into my control room later and take a
 listen and give my two cents from that perspective. Also, did you record
 with a click track? The only reason I ask is because towards the first corse

 it sounded like the drum slowed just a hair on a kick, could just be me
 though. HTH
 - Original Message -
 From: matt diemert mcdiem...@gmail.com
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 1:33 PM
 Subject: Re: Work in progress


 Any mix suggestions? So far just a quick eq on most things just a high
 pass filter. I used the wave  H comp on Vox, and guitar and bass.
 everything else is pretty much as I recorded.



 On 9/18/13, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:
 This is beautiful. Just the way you have performed the song, it is great.

 I

 am glad you have been led to do some of the older Gospel songs in a
 slightly

 more modern way, and God has given you the gift to do so. Just great,
 stay
 focused on the prise.
 - Original Message -
 From: matt diemert mcdiem...@gmail.com
 To: ptaccess ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 7:48 AM
 Subject: Work in progress


 Morning all,
 Heres another one I'm working on, just some basic edits and comps on
 this one. Not a lot of mixing yet.
 Feel free to let me know what ya think.

 https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19716872/because%20he%20lives%209-18.mp3

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups

 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an

 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



 --
 Warm Regards:
 Matt Diemert
 330-980-0046

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an

 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



-- 
Warm Regards:
Matt Diemert
330-980-0046

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: One of my first mixes in PT

[matt diemert]

Thanks all for the comments.
I've mixed before in other daws, namely reaper, and audacity, but back
in march or april a good friend of mine came in to town from Nashville
and spent 3 weeks with me showing me everything he could about PT.
From then onward, I've been on a quest to redo a lot in PT. I find
editing so much nicer in PT.
I was going for a sound here that had a tight bass and kick drums
sound, and I worked to keep the vocal just above the music.
There is a lot going on as there was 5 mics on the amp so obviously
mixing those in to a sub group, and treating them with EQ and
compression ETC.
There is actually about 4 or 5 different guitar tracks going on at a
time, so I'll have to look to see which should go down and which could
stay where they are.
Thanks again.
I've got more things that I'm trying my hand at if anyone would be
intrested in listening.



On 9/16/13, Ricky Prevatte rickypreva...@gmail.com wrote:
 I say bring those vocals up what everyone else did. For the first time I
 thought it was absolutely great. You had good playing there are things that
 I would do to the drums but I am a drummer. I would maybe wet the vocal a
 little bit with some reverb I would use maybe a little more effects on some
 of the guitars. Did you use any compression only overall mix? Did you say
 you played all of the instruments? If you did that you did better than great
 on your first time.

 Ricky Prevatte LMBT1154

 On Sep 16, 2013, at 9:13 PM, Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:

 Now that you mention it, it does kind a have a Gaither kind of feel to it.
 I never thought about that, but you have a good point.

 Chris.

 - Original Message - From: Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 9:03 PM
 Subject: Re: One of my first mixes in PT


 I like it brother Matt, sounds like some Gathor type influence there.
 Would like to hear that voice on a slow Gospel tune. Like Byran said, the
 vocals could be louder, but I think that you should push the guitars down
 a few DB a little, it is good playing, but your vocals are nice and rich
 and I would make sure that you let them shine over the guitar. What is
 the DB on your mane BUS/Master sitting at? Over all, very good job for
 your first run. Keep it up, I would like to hear more.
 - Original Message - From: byron harden sticomu...@gmail.com
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 4:16 PM
 Subject: Re: One of my first mixes in PT


 i think its pretty cool.

 just a little more vocals,

 about 3DB worth.

 little less kick and bass.


 i know that would take it to the next  level.

 this sounds nice ,


 there is a lot more that could be done to it.
 but if this is your first mix,
 it sounds like a great start.
 keep
 On Sep 16, 2013, at 5:17 PM, matt diemert mcdiem...@gmail.com wrote:

 Just thought I'd throw this out there for some ideas on what could be
 better ETC.
 If you're offended by hymns you may not want to listen other wise, I'd
 appreciate any comments.
 I played much of this obviously recorded and mixed in PT 10

 http://www.soundclick.com/player/single_player.cfm?songid=12499545q=hi



 On 9/16/13, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:
 Your fine, I'm glad you pointed it out, I wouldn't want to be thinking
 I'm
 giving somebody a good deal and they could get it for almost a hundred
 or
 more less right on Ebay. Thems the breaks.
 - Original Message -
 From: Matt Diemert mcdiem...@gmail.com
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 8:40 AM
 Subject: Re: good remote control surfaces


 Papa, sorry of my tone seemed accusatory, that certainly wasn't my
 point! I

 was simply pointing out that over the last three months or so, all
 the
 options that I have been in on ended somewhere between 250 and $325.
 Anything above that seems not to really sell.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On Sep 16, 2013, at 12:08 PM, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Hello Matt, at first I was a little put out about what you said, but
 I
 went and checked them out on Ebay and they are much lower than they
 were
 just a year ago. If somebody on here wanted to pick it up I would go
 down

 to $300. Keep in mind, many of the lower $200 and under are the 002
 rack.

 I did see a 002 rack with the black lion mod which was only about
 $450 or

 so, and that is a good deal, but it is not really considered
 portable.
 Take care
 - Original Message - From: Matt Diemert
 mcdiem...@gmail.com
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Cc: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 2:57 AM
 Subject: Re: good remote control surfaces


 400  is probably a bit high by say eBay standards. Though many are
 listed

 in this range the ones that actually sell are closer to the $250
 $325
 range. I've been in on several auctions for a 002 over the last
 month and

 this is what I've experienced.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On Sep 16, 2013, at 12:03

Re: good remote control surfaces

[Matt Diemert]

400  is probably a bit high by say eBay standards. Though many are listed in 
this range the ones that actually sell are closer to the $250 $325 range. I've 
been in on several auctions for a 002 over the last month and this is what I've 
experienced. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 16, 2013, at 12:03 AM, Scott Chesworth scottcheswo...@gmail.com wrote:

 Only downside to the 002 is no scrub wheel. However, assuming used
 gear goes for roughly the same value in the sates as it does here in
 the UK, that's a good price for one.
 
 On 9/16/13, TheOreoMonster monkeypushe...@gmail.com wrote:
 I believe it was discontinued for the 003, but as it was said, a lot of
 people/places still use the 002.
 On Sep 15, 2013, at 10:29 PM, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Nope, but I know small project studios that are still using them with no
 problems. My partner and I both had one in our control room, he is still
 using his.
 - Original Message - From: Jed Barton j...@jedbarton.com
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2013 6:24 PM
 Subject: RE: good remote control surfaces
 
 
 Oh wow,
 Do they still make this surface new?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On
 Behalf
 Of Poppa Bear
 Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2013 10:16 PM
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Subject: Re: good remote control surfaces
 
 I still have a Degidesign 002 that I will let go for $400. It is in very
 good condition, still have the packaging.
 - Original Message -
 From: TheOreoMonster monkeypushe...@gmail.com
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2013 5:47 PM
 Subject: Re: good remote control surfaces
 
 
 if you want one that doubles as a control surface, the 003 is probably
 a good place to start. Otherwise, if you are in the states, you may
 want to contact a store like www.sweetwater.com and talk to a sales
 engineer who can help you decide on something.
 On Sep 14, 2013, at 8:29 AM, Jed Barton j...@jedbarton.com wrote:
 
 Hey guys,
 Alright, I am about to make the jump to buy protools, but before I do
 I need a suggestion for a remote control surface.  I know there are
 so many out there.
 Having one with a scrub wheel would be extremely helpful.
 Any ideas?
 
 Thanks,
 Jed
 
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
 send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: pro tools ten

[matt diemert]

I bought PT 10 from ebay for $350 have had no problems whatsoever.


On 9/15/13, TheOreoMonster monkeypushe...@gmail.com wrote:
 last i looked amazon, still had copies of 10 with the free 11 upgrade
 included  Mayb e worth a look to see what they have now.
 On Sep 15, 2013, at 3:06 AM, byron harden sticomu...@gmail.com wrote:

 i did not sir.
 but that sounds like a great start.
 i did not think of that.

 my brain is fryed

 thanks broDid you check Ebay?
 - Original Message - From: byron harden sticomu...@gmail.com
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 10:53 PM
 Subject: pro tools ten


 hello everyone, i sent an email out in hopes of finding out if there was
 a place i could get the pro tools ten from.


 if so please let me know as soon as you can thanks in advance

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



-- 
Warm Regards:
Matt Diemert
330-980-0046

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: good remote control surfaces

[Matt Diemert]

Papa, sorry of my tone seemed accusatory, that certainly wasn't my point! I was 
simply pointing out that over the last three months or so, all the options that 
I have been in on ended somewhere between 250 and $325. Anything above that 
seems not to really sell.

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 16, 2013, at 12:08 PM, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello Matt, at first I was a little put out about what you said, but I went 
 and checked them out on Ebay and they are much lower than they were just a 
 year ago. If somebody on here wanted to pick it up I would go down to $300. 
 Keep in mind, many of the lower $200 and under are the 002 rack. I did see a 
 002 rack with the black lion mod which was only about $450 or so, and that is 
 a good deal, but it is not really considered portable.
 Take care
 - Original Message - From: Matt Diemert mcdiem...@gmail.com
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Cc: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 2:57 AM
 Subject: Re: good remote control surfaces
 
 
 400  is probably a bit high by say eBay standards. Though many are listed in 
 this range the ones that actually sell are closer to the $250 $325 range. 
 I've been in on several auctions for a 002 over the last month and this is 
 what I've experienced.
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
 On Sep 16, 2013, at 12:03 AM, Scott Chesworth scottcheswo...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 
 Only downside to the 002 is no scrub wheel. However, assuming used
 gear goes for roughly the same value in the sates as it does here in
 the UK, that's a good price for one.
 
 On 9/16/13, TheOreoMonster monkeypushe...@gmail.com wrote:
 I believe it was discontinued for the 003, but as it was said, a lot of
 people/places still use the 002.
 On Sep 15, 2013, at 10:29 PM, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Nope, but I know small project studios that are still using them with no
 problems. My partner and I both had one in our control room, he is still
 using his.
 - Original Message - From: Jed Barton j...@jedbarton.com
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2013 6:24 PM
 Subject: RE: good remote control surfaces
 
 
 Oh wow,
 Do they still make this surface new?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On
 Behalf
 Of Poppa Bear
 Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2013 10:16 PM
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Subject: Re: good remote control surfaces
 
 I still have a Degidesign 002 that I will let go for $400. It is in very
 good condition, still have the packaging.
 - Original Message -
 From: TheOreoMonster monkeypushe...@gmail.com
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2013 5:47 PM
 Subject: Re: good remote control surfaces
 
 
 if you want one that doubles as a control surface, the 003 is probably
 a good place to start. Otherwise, if you are in the states, you may
 want to contact a store like www.sweetwater.com and talk to a sales
 engineer who can help you decide on something.
 On Sep 14, 2013, at 8:29 AM, Jed Barton j...@jedbarton.com wrote:
 
 Hey guys,
 Alright, I am about to make the jump to buy protools, but before I do
 I need a suggestion for a remote control surface.  I know there are
 so many out there.
 Having one with a scrub wheel would be extremely helpful.
 Any ideas?
 
 Thanks,
 Jed
 
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
 send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group

One of my first mixes in PT

[matt diemert]

Just thought I'd throw this out there for some ideas on what could be
better ETC.
If you're offended by hymns you may not want to listen other wise, I'd
appreciate any comments.
I played much of this obviously recorded and mixed in PT 10

http://www.soundclick.com/player/single_player.cfm?songid=12499545q=hi



On 9/16/13, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:
 Your fine, I'm glad you pointed it out, I wouldn't want to be thinking I'm
 giving somebody a good deal and they could get it for almost a hundred or
 more less right on Ebay. Thems the breaks.
 - Original Message -
 From: Matt Diemert mcdiem...@gmail.com
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 8:40 AM
 Subject: Re: good remote control surfaces


 Papa, sorry of my tone seemed accusatory, that certainly wasn't my point! I

 was simply pointing out that over the last three months or so, all the
 options that I have been in on ended somewhere between 250 and $325.
 Anything above that seems not to really sell.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On Sep 16, 2013, at 12:08 PM, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello Matt, at first I was a little put out about what you said, but I
 went and checked them out on Ebay and they are much lower than they were
 just a year ago. If somebody on here wanted to pick it up I would go down

 to $300. Keep in mind, many of the lower $200 and under are the 002 rack.

 I did see a 002 rack with the black lion mod which was only about $450 or

 so, and that is a good deal, but it is not really considered portable.
 Take care
 - Original Message - From: Matt Diemert mcdiem...@gmail.com
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Cc: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 2:57 AM
 Subject: Re: good remote control surfaces


 400  is probably a bit high by say eBay standards. Though many are listed

 in this range the ones that actually sell are closer to the $250 $325
 range. I've been in on several auctions for a 002 over the last month and

 this is what I've experienced.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On Sep 16, 2013, at 12:03 AM, Scott Chesworth scottcheswo...@gmail.com

 wrote:

 Only downside to the 002 is no scrub wheel. However, assuming used
 gear goes for roughly the same value in the sates as it does here in
 the UK, that's a good price for one.

 On 9/16/13, TheOreoMonster monkeypushe...@gmail.com wrote:
 I believe it was discontinued for the 003, but as it was said, a lot
 of
 people/places still use the 002.
 On Sep 15, 2013, at 10:29 PM, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Nope, but I know small project studios that are still using them with

 no
 problems. My partner and I both had one in our control room, he is
 still
 using his.
 - Original Message - From: Jed Barton j...@jedbarton.com
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2013 6:24 PM
 Subject: RE: good remote control surfaces


 Oh wow,
 Do they still make this surface new?

 -Original Message-
 From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com]
 On
 Behalf
 Of Poppa Bear
 Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2013 10:16 PM
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Subject: Re: good remote control surfaces

 I still have a Degidesign 002 that I will let go for $400. It is in
 very
 good condition, still have the packaging.
 - Original Message -
 From: TheOreoMonster monkeypushe...@gmail.com
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2013 5:47 PM
 Subject: Re: good remote control surfaces


 if you want one that doubles as a control surface, the 003 is
 probably
 a good place to start. Otherwise, if you are in the states, you may
 want to contact a store like www.sweetwater.com and talk to a sales
 engineer who can help you decide on something.
 On Sep 14, 2013, at 8:29 AM, Jed Barton j...@jedbarton.com wrote:

 Hey guys,
 Alright, I am about to make the jump to buy protools, but before I

 do
 I need a suggestion for a remote control surface.  I know there
 are
 so many out there.
 Having one with a scrub wheel would be extremely helpful.
 Any ideas?

 Thanks,
 Jed

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
 send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
 send
 an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
 send
 an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com

Re: ProTools isn't seeing my Motu 828 HiBrid properly

[matt diemert]

If you've not got this working as of yet, I'd try the following.
In pro tools after opening a project, Go under setup, and IO. Do a
physical mouse click on input tab I do this by pressing control
command option f5, and then clicking with the mouse. Then voice over
to your right until you hear default. VOice over space on this and
then click ok. It switches your IO to default which has worked for me
twice in the past with my scarlet.

On 8/27/13, trevor trevor.sco...@btopenworld.com wrote:
 I've tried both of those.
 I've tried everything that I can think of.

 I have selected it in audio and midi so I don't understand why protools
 isn't seeing it.


 Thank you for your help,

 Trevor
 -Original Message-
 From: Monkey Pusher
 Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 4:56 PM
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Subject: Re: ProTools isn't seeing my Motu 828 HiBrid properly

 Are  you setting these  options in teh playback engine  then click ok
 and then create a new track and trying to change the  inputs? Or did
 you select the playbackengine options, click ok, and quit pro tools.
 Then came back later to do something and when u opened it and created
 a new project it was back to built in mic/line?


 On 8/27/13, trevor trevor.sco...@btopenworld.com wrote:
 When I go in to hardware set up it does say Motu HiBrid, and in the
 playback
 engin, the same but, when I try to select audio ins and outs, the motu
 isn’t
 anywhere to be seen.
 The only option is the built in microphone or line in.

 Can anyone help me sort it out please?

 Thank you,

 Trevor

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



-- 
Warm Regards:
Matt Diemert
330-980-0046

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Renaming a track, editing busses and my project mix

[matt diemert]

As for renaming a track, I typically do this from the edit window
right after creating the track. interact with  the track list table,
and find the created track. Press voice over shift m, and r for
rename, you may then need to press enter and you can type a name in
for the track.
As for the project mix, when you go under input do you have a sub menu
for interface? This is typically where I do my adjustments.


On 8/21/13, Krister Ekstrom kris...@kristersplace.com wrote:
 Hello good people.
 Well now i've actually dared taking the plunge and started working with
 Protools. I have set up a session and created the tracks, but i can for the
 life of me not remember how to rename them to something meaningful. Pointing
 the vo cursor to the track i wanted to rename then routing the mouse to it
 and trying to physically click on it yealded no results whatsoever, the
 track refuses to let itself be renamed, what obvious thing am i missing
 here?
 I see that there are lots of busses made, and that's great, but can you edit
 them or give them other names than for example bus 7/8?
 And the third thing i want to ask. How does the control surface work
 together with Pro tools? In other words what should i set the input paths to
 in order to get signal from the control surface? I have a Project mix and
 it's not listed in the input path selector. The only things listed there are
 built-in mike or built-in input should the Project mixes inputs be
 listed there and how do i do to get them listed there, because they're not
 now.
 Thanks for all help and thanks for bearing with these stupid newbie
 questions.
 /Krister

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



-- 
Warm Regards:
Matt Diemert
330-980-0046

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Saffire Pro 40

[Matt Diemert]

Chris, I have the USB equivalency of the pro 40. What I did is switched it to 
Dall monitoring there's a drop-down box and it's probably set to monitoring as 
it is. Try changing that the dog monitoring

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 19, 2013, at 9:41 AM, Chris Norman chris.norm...@googlemail.com wrote:

 Hi all,
 Does anyone have a Focusrite Saffire Pro 40 setup and configured that I could 
 steal the configuration from?
 
 The dirver is completely inaccessible, so far as I can tell anyways, and what 
 little I do know about it, doesn't make enough sense for me to try and 
 explain to my nontechnical girlfriend, for her to help me make it work right.
 
 It's all set up in my rack, it's just monitoring absolutely everything that 
 goes into it, and sending it all on all outputs.
 
 If no one does, I'll get mine set up, and post the configuration file to the 
 list.
 
 Cheers,
 
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: 2 questions about Pro tools that confuse me to no end.

[Matt Diemert]

If you created an audio track, and you just want to play along without 
recording, you can arm the track, and switch the monitoring to auto option K 
this will allow you to hit play and hear what you play along.

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 19, 2013, at 10:49 AM, Chris Norman chris.norm...@googlemail.com wrote:

 Yes, that's exactly right. 
 
 Furthermore, you can hear what's coming in on an aux channel while the 
 project is playing. This is not true of an audio track. 
 
 HTH, 
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
 On 19 Aug 2013, at 15:30, Krister Ekstrom kris...@kristersplace.com wrote:
 
 Hi and thanks for the answer. I'll have to try setting up things correctly 
 regarding the Projectmix. Let me see if i can get one thing clear though, 
 You say that if i have a keyboard for example that i want to play along to 
 other tracks with, i should put that on an aux-track, is this because you 
 don't need to arm an aux track? Sorry if the questions sound daft, i'm 
 trying to get a grip on all this.
 /Krister
 
 19 aug 2013 kl. 15:26 skrev Chris Norman chris.norm...@googlemail.com:
 
 See answers imbedded below:
 
 On 19 Aug 2013, at 12:48, Krister Ekstrom kris...@kristersplace.com wrote:
 
 …
 
 The first thing is: I have a M-Audio Projectmix as a surface for the Pro 
 tools application. How do i let Protools know that it should record sounds 
 that come from the inputs of the control surface? If i choose input path 
 for a given track, i only have the computers built in microphones and line 
 in to choose from. What if anything do i need to select to make the 
 interfaces inputs be seen by Pro tools, or is it not possible?
 
 Go into the setup menu, and go to Playback engine.
 
 In there the first control is a list of all the audio devices on your 
 system. Choose Project Mix Multi Channel from there.
 
 If you want the faders to work, go to the Setup menu again, and go to 
 Periferals. Select the MIDI controlers tab, by pressing command 3 or 
 whatever it's page number is. Then, in the first column, select HUI, then 
 select the Project mix control port, and set it for 8 channels.
 
 Second question i have is kinda rettorical but it confused me so that i 
 stopped preparing for a recording just because i didn't understand this: 
 Why do you send say the reverb return track out via the sends to delay and 
 chorus? Does anyone really want chorus or delay on a reverb? I saw this in 
 one of the templates, and got totally confused.
 
 OK, a little bit on sends…
 
 Imagine I am your clean vocal track. I am singing, and you think, hey, he 
 sounds boring, add some reverb. Now, you are my reverb unit. So I'll sing 
 at you, and you'll replicate what I sing, as well as adding the reverb. 
 Now, when we sing together, people hear my clean voice, as well as your 
 doing the reverb. If we'd put reverb directly onto the track, that would be 
 the same as me whispering what I want sung in your ear, then you 
 reproducing it - you'll hear none of the original signal, and all the 
 reverb type things.
 
 Also, it's good practise to use sends because if for example, you want 
 reverb, and delay, and some chorus on your vocals, then you can do it 
 without the nasty interactions which can occur with loads of effects.
 
 Of course, you might want reverb on your delay, then chorus on the whole 
 thing, and that's fine if you want it. Basically, try and play around with 
 some of the different methods of doing things, and see which you like the 
 sound of.
 
 A little tip for you too, if you have say a keyboard, and you want to bring 
 it into Pro Tools, and play along with the track a little. Putting this 
 keyboard onto an Auxiliary track means you can hear it while the track 
 plays, then, when you want to record, just send the output of that aux 
 track to another track for recording.
 
 I hope this hasn't served to just confuse you any more. Honestly, just play 
 around and see what you get. You might hate the results, but, don't forget, 
 if you don't know how to make the sounds you dislike, you don't know how to 
 avoid them either.
 
 Have fun, and keep at it.
 
 
 
 /Krister
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more 

Re: Setting selection points and deselecting tracks

[matt diemert]

 much and I wish y'all a lovely day!

 Smiles,

 Cara :)
 ---
 View my Online Portfolio at:

 http://www.onemodelplace.com/CaraQuinn

 Follow me on Twitter!

 https://twitter.com/ModelCara

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.





-- 
Warm Regards:
Matt Diemert
330-980-0046

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Quick intro and question

[matt diemert]

I bought an iLok from amazon for $39.
 SO all tole I had $364 in the whole thing.

On 6/24/13, TheOreoMonster monkeypushe...@gmail.com wrote:
 $325 is more like it, though that could be a problem for since it doesn't
 include an iLok.
 On Jun 23, 2013, at 11:53 PM, matt diemert mcdiem...@gmail.com wrote:

 I purchased my PT 10 license from ebay for $325, as I already had an
 ilock this process was painless and took less than  5 minutes once I
 purchased and the seller recieved payment. I only considered sellers
 who had over 1000 feedback to conduct this transaction with.

 On 6/23/13, Cara Quinn modelc...@gmail.com wrote:
 As far as I know that only includes the software / iLock.

 I do have an interface (Alesis USB Mixer) but am also looking at an M-box
 as
 the quality will be much better. We'll see…

 Cara :)
 On Jun 23, 2013, at 7:13 PM, TheOreoMonster monkeypushe...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 is that just for the software? or does it include an interface as well?
 Do
 you already have an interface?
 On Jun 23, 2013, at 9:47 PM, Cara Quinn caraqu...@caraquinn.com wrote:

 Hi All,

 My name is Cara and while I've used many apps to record I'm a new PT
 user.
 -Or at least I will be soon. :)

 I'm looking into getting a copy of PT 10 and am just wondering what a
 decent price for a used copy would be?

 I've found one for about $500 so am thinking I'll get it but thought
 I'd
 check in with y'all experienced users first. :)

 Anyway, am super-excited to get back into recording / producing after a
 while away from it.

 Thanks for any feedback y'all might have.

 Have a great day / evening wherever you may be!

 Smiles,

 Cara :)
 ---
 View my Online Portfolio at:

 http://www.onemodelplace.com/CaraQuinn

 Follow me on Twitter!

 https://twitter.com/ModelCara

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.





 --
 Warm Regards:
 Matt Diemert
 330-980-0046

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.





-- 
Warm Regards:
Matt Diemert
330-980-0046

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.