Re: CfC: new WD of Clipboard API and Events; deadline April 5
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:37:46 +0200, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote: This is a Call for Consensus to publish a new Working Draft of Hallvord's Clipboard API and Events spec: http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/clipops/clipops.html Please do... cheers -- Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Re: CfC: new WD of Clipboard API and Events; deadline April 5
Is the process currently requesting us to publish a draft so that comments can be gathered from the public? paul Le 29 mars 2011 à 13:37, Arthur Barstow a écrit : This is a Call for Consensus to publish a new Working Draft of Hallvord's Clipboard API and Events spec: http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/clipops/clipops.html If you have any comments or concerns about this proposal, please send them to public-webapps by April 5 at the latest. As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and encouraged and silence will be assumed to be agreement with the proposal. Please note that during this CfC, Hallvord will continue to edit the ED and will create a Table of Contents before the spec is published in w3.org/TR/. -Art Barstow
Re: CfC: new WD of Clipboard API and Events; deadline April 5
Hi Paul, We welcome comments on all of WebApps' specs at any time. The W3C Process Document includes a so-called heart beat publication requirement that effectively says a WG should publish each spec in /TR/ at least every 3 months. For a variety of reasons, we aren't strict about that requirement in this WG. For this particular spec, it has been a very long time (2006) since it was lasted published in /TR/ and since that version has no link to the latest ED, one could easily conclude no work has been done on that spec. However, the reality is Hallvord has done significant work on the spec and as such, it facilitates setting expectations for us to publish a new WD. -Art Barstow On Mar/29/2011 10:22 AM, ext Paul Libbrecht wrote: Is the process currently requesting us to publish a draft so that comments can be gathered from the public? paul Le 29 mars 2011 à 13:37, Arthur Barstow a écrit : This is a Call for Consensus to publish a new Working Draft of Hallvord's Clipboard API and Events spec: http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/clipops/clipops.html If you have any comments or concerns about this proposal, please send them to public-webapps by April 5 at the latest. As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and encouraged and silence will be assumed to be agreement with the proposal. Please note that during this CfC, Hallvord will continue to edit the ED and will create a Table of Contents before the spec is published in w3.org/TR/. -Art Barstow
Re: CfC: new WD of Clipboard API and Events; deadline April 5
Well, so here are my comments: --- I would reformulate: MathML often needs to be transformed to be copied as plain text, for example to make sure to the power of is shown with the caret ^ sign. Also, the XML source could be placed in the clipboard with the appropriate transformation occurring when pasting. into: MathML often needs to be transformed to be copied as plain text, for example to make sure to the power of is shown with the caret ^ sign in a formula plain-text input. Also, the XML source could be placed in the clipboard with the appropriate transformation occurring when pasting. this is great! --- Since the API should be that of HTML5, I think it is important to have a more direct link to the appropriate HTML5 section. I also think the parameter names and arity should be repeated. -- I believe an example of typical data-types really is needed (yes to one of the question there!). HTML5 leaves it open to use native types or mime's media-types, but warns about spaces... it seems quite fussy. Hence best practice is wished. --- Le 29 mars 2011 à 16:46, Arthur Barstow a écrit : For this particular spec, it has been a very long time (2006) since it was lasted published in /TR/ and since that version has no link to the latest ED, one could easily conclude no work has been done on that spec. However, the reality is Hallvord has done significant work on the spec and as such, it facilitates setting expectations for us to publish a new WD. Please receive my personal approval to publish as a WD, even with none of my issues addressed. it's great to see it evolving. paul Le 29 mars 2011 à 13:37, Arthur Barstow a écrit : This is a Call for Consensus to publish a new Working Draft of Hallvord's Clipboard API and Events spec: http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/clipops/clipops.html If you have any comments or concerns about this proposal, please send them to public-webapps by April 5 at the latest. As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and encouraged and silence will be assumed to be agreement with the proposal. Please note that during this CfC, Hallvord will continue to edit the ED and will create a Table of Contents before the spec is published in w3.org/TR/. -Art Barstow
Re: websockets protocol getting solid - cross-reviews?
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011, Thomas Roessler wrote: The websockets protocol is getting to a point where it's not quite in Last Call yet, but could use review from an API perspective: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-06 I'm copying the chairs of the IETF hybi WG (Gabriel Montenegro and Salvatore Loreto), and Mark Nottingham (IETF liaison to the W3C). I sent Ian a review from the API perspective relatively recently. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E)\._.,--,'``.fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A/, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Re: websockets protocol getting solid - cross-reviews; deadline April 15
Hi All - I see that Hixie already submitted comments and I encourage others, especially those that have participated in the implementation of the Web Sockets API, to also submit comments. All comments should be submitted to h...@ietf.org by April 15 at the latest. If anyone in WebApps wants to propose an official WG response, please do so ASAP, in reply to this email so the WebApps WG can discuss it. Thomas - for those of us not familiar with IETF process: * If their Last Call process differs from the W3C's LC process, please explain the diff(s) * Does the IETF have a Candidate Recommendation publication and process like the W3C? In particular, will the IETF create a test suite and mandate two or implementations pass the test suite before they consider the protocol spec done? Also, when - approximately - does the IETF plan to publish a LC of the Web Socket Protocol? -Art Barstow On Mar/29/2011 7:58 AM, ext Thomas Roessler wrote: The websockets protocol is getting to a point where it's not quite in Last Call yet, but could use review from an API perspective: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-06 I'm copying the chairs of the IETF hybi WG (Gabriel Montenegro and Salvatore Loreto), and Mark Nottingham (IETF liaison to the W3C). Regards, -- Thomas Roessler, W3Ct...@w3.org (@roessler)
[Bug 10585] Need an error to indicate that the user disallowed access
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10585 Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 12366] IDBSuccessEvent is not defined anywhere, yet it is used (remove it)
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12366 Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||jo...@sicking.cc Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #2 from Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc 2011-03-30 01:08:09 UTC --- Checked in a fix -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug.
