Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Unable to display Filebucket in Dashboard 1.2rc3 : We're sorry, but something went wrong

[Peter Meier]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

> Also I noticed I can only read the first file, the changed file, not
> the second, the original (content changed '{md5}
> 70c1c6de6d4b1a02ec32b463e4d255b0' to '{md5}
> 78124298c2b4c1e63658599a2c208853') :
> 
> info: FileBucket read 70c1c6de6d4b1a02ec32b463e4d255b0
> info: Could not find file_bucket_file for
> 'md5/78124298c2b4c1e63658599a2c208853'

This is a known current limitation:
http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/7934

Because puppet hasn't yet uploaded the version of the file to the file
bucket it installed, it only uploads the changed versions.

~pete
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk4/hukACgkQbwltcAfKi38/mACfbsAwBocPZ/TqGXjWc2SJmWUW
PB8An1Rm+UkZVkQ0BSO5BGqL8ACF2apn
=QIfL
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.

Re: [Puppet Users] Workaround to "Provider groupadd does not support features manages_members" ?

[Peter Meier]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi

> I wanted to manage a couple of groups membership, under RedHat,
> without managing the users (as they are LDAP users) but found out it
> is not supported Is there a workaround to this?

As denmat mentioned as well I would generally try to avoid a local
groups and ldap users mix.

But, it's possible to use augeas to manage users in a group:
https://github.com/duritong/puppet-user/blob/9bbd720da1549bf58c7707c1ac109a47e4b4a946/manifests/groups/manage_user.pp

~pete
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk4/hKkACgkQbwltcAfKi3+XuACePGaZjfkJm+ySkVoMq6z7VDGo
nLgAn2MGcXo7zbpwQNlN7VDtG8A35cE9
=AI9M
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Step by step guide to setting user passwords

[Michael Stahnke]

On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:13 AM, Ryan Conway  wrote:
> One more thing - Puppet will fail to set the password unless the
> libshadow gem is present, as this is required to work with shadow
> passwords.
It doesn't have to be the gem.  It can be anything that provides the
libraries (such as the ruby-shadow rpm package).

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.

[Puppet Users] Re: Config files based on rpm version

[treydock]

To get the version you'll likely have to use facts, but once you have
the facts you can use something like the following...

file {
"/etc/pam.d/system-auth-ac":
source  => $operatingsystemrelease ? {
/5.(\d)/ =>
"puppet:///modules/kerberize/system-auth-ac",
/6.(\d)/ =>
"puppet:///modules/kerberize/system-auth-ac.centos6",
},

That example points to a different configuration file based on the OS
release number (this example is for CentOS).  So the first condition
is true if 5.x and the second for anything 6.0 and so on.  Should be
similar once you have your custom fact made.

- Trey

On Aug 6, 2:08 am, carl  wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a few virtuozzo servers that are running different versions.
> Some are running 4.0 and some are running 4.6. I am having a hard time
> figuring out how to set the configuration file based on the rpm
> version that is currently installed. Is there a tutorial or page that
> has an example of something like this?
>
> Thanks

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.

Re: [Puppet Users] Step by step guide to setting user passwords

[Derek J. Balling]

On Aug 2, 2011, at 8:35 PM, Len Rugen wrote:
> In puppet, passwd => 
> "$6$PVOar6qN$WUTN7HG838PnAdzLYCB4HHVSzE/SX100VVdsiIYlBo7TM5c79R38gx942Lkm710v1HMRmS5VnPbHZ2MwY96wt0",

Make sure to use single-quotes, or puppet will try to evaluate variables 
"$PVOar", "$WUTN", etc., etc.

D

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: resuable module patterns

[Scott Smith]

Virtual resources.

On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 4:51 PM, ashwoods  wrote:

> No, not really. Because that would require me to modify the 3rd party
> modules to use that base packages module
> instead of how its defined. i.e. if i need build-essentials for my
> django module, put it on github, anybody who uses my module
> and maybe have another module of their own that also defines build-
> essentials, forces them to fork libraries.
>
> I am still very new to puppet, so maybe im missing somewhat obvious.
>
> On 7 Aug., 23:48, Denmat  wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > You might like to have a base packages module that contains a
> 'build-essentials' class (or whatever title you like).
> >
> > Then include it and reference the package in your ruby/python modules.
> >
> > include 'basepackages::build-essentials'
> >
> > ...
> >   require => Package['build-essentials']
> > ...
> >
> > That help?
> >
> > Den
> >
> > On 08/08/2011, at 2:21, ashwoods  wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > i'm trying to write a couple of modules to install generic python &
> > > ruby apps.
> > > how do you handle dependencies that are present in two modules, i.e. a
> > > package dependency,
> > > without causing an already defined error.
> >
> > > lets say:
> >
> > > module django:
> >
> > > class django {
> > > package { "build-essential':
> > >   ensure => present,
> > > }
> > > 
> > > 
> > > }
> >
> > > module ruby_on_rails:
> > > class ruby {
> > > package { "build-essential':
> > >   ensure => present,
> > > }
> > > 
> > > 
> > > }
> >
> > > if i define this like this,  I get an already defined error. I know I
> > > can fix this by defining a third class and import it from the others,
> > > but you can only do that with the modules you "control".
> >
> > > So how do you define package dependencies in a module in a
> > > "encapsulated" and reusable way.
> > > it seems that its common to include 3rd party puppet modules by
> > > linking them via git submodules or by placing them under the module
> > > folders, but if i have to fork every 3rd party module that causes the
> > > error it seems that i am doing something wrong.
> >
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Puppet Users" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > > For more options, visit this group athttp://
> groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Puppet Users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.

[Puppet Users] Re: resuable module patterns

[ashwoods]

No, not really. Because that would require me to modify the 3rd party
modules to use that base packages module
instead of how its defined. i.e. if i need build-essentials for my
django module, put it on github, anybody who uses my module
and maybe have another module of their own that also defines build-
essentials, forces them to fork libraries.

I am still very new to puppet, so maybe im missing somewhat obvious.

On 7 Aug., 23:48, Denmat  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You might like to have a base packages module that contains a 
> 'build-essentials' class (or whatever title you like).
>
> Then include it and reference the package in your ruby/python modules.
>
> include 'basepackages::build-essentials'
>
> ...
>   require => Package['build-essentials']
> ...
>
> That help?
>
> Den
>
> On 08/08/2011, at 2:21, ashwoods  wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > i'm trying to write a couple of modules to install generic python &
> > ruby apps.
> > how do you handle dependencies that are present in two modules, i.e. a
> > package dependency,
> > without causing an already defined error.
>
> > lets say:
>
> > module django:
>
> > class django {
> >         package { "build-essential':
> >               ensure => present,
> >         }
> >         
> >         
> > }
>
> > module ruby_on_rails:
> > class ruby {
> >         package { "build-essential':
> >               ensure => present,
> >         }
> >         
> >         
> > }
>
> > if i define this like this,  I get an already defined error. I know I
> > can fix this by defining a third class and import it from the others,
> > but you can only do that with the modules you "control".
>
> > So how do you define package dependencies in a module in a
> > "encapsulated" and reusable way.
> > it seems that its common to include 3rd party puppet modules by
> > linking them via git submodules or by placing them under the module
> > folders, but if i have to fork every 3rd party module that causes the
> > error it seems that i am doing something wrong.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "Puppet Users" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group 
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.

Re: [Puppet Users] Workaround to "Provider groupadd does not support features manages_members" ?

[Denmat]

Hi,

Not to clear on your situation but the following is available to you. 

Manage your jbossd groups in LDAP. That will be easiest. Create a posix ldap 
group and add users as your members, remembering to keep your uids and gids 
standard.

The other option is to duplicate the users in the manifest and manage their 
groups. That makes managing accounts a bit more difficult.

I would as a general rule avoid duplication and trying have your user accounts 
and system accounts centrally managed where possible.

Cheers,
Den

On 08/08/2011, at 7:14, Mohamed Lrhazi  wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> I wanted to manage a couple of groups membership, under RedHat,
> without managing the users (as they are LDAP users) but found out it
> is not supported Is there a workaround to this?
> 
> I tried:
> 
> group { "jbossd":
>gid => 520,
>members => ["user1","user2"],
>}
> 
> Thanks a lot.
> Mohamed.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Puppet Users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.

Re: [Puppet Users] resuable module patterns

[Denmat]

Hi,

You might like to have a base packages module that contains a 
'build-essentials' class (or whatever title you like).

Then include it and reference the package in your ruby/python modules.

include 'basepackages::build-essentials'

...
  require => Package['build-essentials']
...

That help?

Den

On 08/08/2011, at 2:21, ashwoods  wrote:

> i'm trying to write a couple of modules to install generic python &
> ruby apps.
> how do you handle dependencies that are present in two modules, i.e. a
> package dependency,
> without causing an already defined error.
> 
> lets say:
> 
> module django:
> 
> class django {
> package { "build-essential':
>   ensure => present,
> }
> 
> 
> }
> 
> module ruby_on_rails:
> class ruby {
> package { "build-essential':
>   ensure => present,
> }
> 
> 
> }
> 
> if i define this like this,  I get an already defined error. I know I
> can fix this by defining a third class and import it from the others,
> but you can only do that with the modules you "control".
> 
> So how do you define package dependencies in a module in a
> "encapsulated" and reusable way.
> it seems that its common to include 3rd party puppet modules by
> linking them via git submodules or by placing them under the module
> folders, but if i have to fork every 3rd party module that causes the
> error it seems that i am doing something wrong.
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Puppet Users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.

[Puppet Users] Workaround to "Provider groupadd does not support features manages_members" ?

[Mohamed Lrhazi]

Hello,

I wanted to manage a couple of groups membership, under RedHat,
without managing the users (as they are LDAP users) but found out it
is not supported Is there a workaround to this?

I tried:

group { "jbossd":
gid => 520,
members => ["user1","user2"],
}

Thanks a lot.
Mohamed.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.

[Puppet Users] resuable module patterns

[ashwoods]

i'm trying to write a couple of modules to install generic python &
ruby apps.
how do you handle dependencies that are present in two modules, i.e. a
package dependency,
without causing an already defined error.

lets say:

module django:

class django {
 package { "build-essential':
   ensure => present,
 }
 
 
}

module ruby_on_rails:
class ruby {
 package { "build-essential':
   ensure => present,
 }
 
 
}

if i define this like this,  I get an already defined error. I know I
can fix this by defining a third class and import it from the others,
but you can only do that with the modules you "control".

So how do you define package dependencies in a module in a
"encapsulated" and reusable way.
it seems that its common to include 3rd party puppet modules by
linking them via git submodules or by placing them under the module
folders, but if i have to fork every 3rd party module that causes the
error it seems that i am doing something wrong.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.

[Puppet Users] Re: Help setting up Ubuntu preseed for Puppet Clients

[Jfro]

This is extremely helpful!

I didn' t realize that puppet was not set up to install upon boot.

I hoping to finalize my preseeed file soon and I'll let you know how it 
went.

Thanks,
Jason

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-users/-/3mqC9kWnWBIJ.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.

[Puppet Users] Redmine and Forge outage

[James Turnbull]

Hi all

This morning one of our hosting boxes - the one hosting our Redmine
issues box and the Forge site - went down.  The issue was a DC one and
has been resolved.

We apologise for any inconvenience and please feel free to email me if
you have any continued issues!

Thanks

James Turnbull

-- 
James Turnbull
Puppet Labs
1-503-734-8571

Join us for PuppetConf , September 22nd
and 23rd in Portland, Oregon, USA.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.

[Puppet Users] Re: Step by step guide to setting user passwords

[Jamie]

Sorry, kinda late on this one, but seems some easy methods left out.

Use grub-md5-crypt
$ grub-md5-crypt
Password:
Retype password:
$1$nS12E0$nmw5cTWJLwW7KujMpApKh0 <-- PUT THE RESULT IN YOUR
MANIFEST

or use the openssl command
$ openssl passwd -1
Password:
Verifying - Password:
$1$SF8zTedH$rfFKDI1pS2ljMRP14tYTj0 <-- PUT THE RESULT IN YOUR
MANIFEST








On Aug 2, 3:52 pm, Jfro  wrote:
> I'm new to Puppet but have searched this group and Puppet docs for how to
> set up user passwords using puppet.  I haven't found a clear answer about
> setting user passwords.
>
> I understand that it is a security risk to send plain text passwords via
> Puppet.  However, for my use case (setting up one "student" user on a school
> computer lab) I think the risk is acceptable.
>
> Can someone walk me through the steps of sending out a password to all my
> computers for user "student."
>
> My puppetmaster and puppets are running Ubuntu Lucide 10.4 LTS.
>
> Thanks for getting a newbie off the ground!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.

[Puppet Users] Re: Config files based on rpm version

[John Martin]

You could creat a fact that returns the version number of the package
installed.  Then in the configuration file use Boolean logic to set
values and blocks of the config file templates accordingly.  Note that
there is a puppet function you will need to compare the version
strings however I don't know it off the top of my head.

John

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.