[Puppet Users] Re: Controlling the order of execution of puppet code?
Rene wrote: > Does anybody know the status of that patch? > It's pushed and will be in 0.25.0. The next 0.25.0 release will be beta2 but I haven't got a date yet. Regards James Turnbull -- Author of: * Pro Linux Systems Administration (http://tinyurl.com/linuxadmin) * Pulling Strings with Puppet (http://tinyurl.com/pupbook) * Pro Nagios 2.0 (http://tinyurl.com/pronagios) * Hardening Linux (http://tinyurl.com/hardeninglinux) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[Puppet Users] Re: Controlling the order of execution of puppet code?
Does anybody know the status of that patch? On May 29, 10:01 am, Brice Figureau wrote: > On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 08:18 +1000, James Turnbull wrote: > > Brice Figureau wrote: > > > On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 11:55 +0200, Peter Meier wrote: > > >> Hi > > > >>> Only way I know is to make individual objects depend on other objects. > > >>> Can't do it at > > >>> class level... I think there is a feature request somewhere in the > > >>> system for this, because > > >>> I'd like it as well... > > >> hmm did I only dream that in the upcoming release there will be a > > >> require (or something like that) keyword to include a class and > > >> require it. Unfortunately I'm not able to find the appropriate bug > > >> report. > > > > I implemented it for sure, but in the end I think it was rejected: > > >http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/1907 > > > > Re-reading the thread I see why we rejected the bug, but not the patch. > > > I think I'll have to resubmit it. > > > Yes - had to go re-read myself. As long as we provide both functions - > > include and a stronger require - I think this is an easy +1. > > Yes, that's what my patch was doing. > I'll resurrect the patch and post it to puppet-dev this week-end. > -- > Brice Figureau > My Blog:http://www.masterzen.fr/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Puppet Users] Re: Controlling the order of execution of puppet code?
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 08:18 +1000, James Turnbull wrote: > Brice Figureau wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 11:55 +0200, Peter Meier wrote: > >> Hi > >> > >>> Only way I know is to make individual objects depend on other objects. > >>> Can't do it at > >>> class level... I think there is a feature request somewhere in the > >>> system for this, because > >>> I'd like it as well... > >> hmm did I only dream that in the upcoming release there will be a > >> require (or something like that) keyword to include a class and > >> require it. Unfortunately I'm not able to find the appropriate bug > >> report. > > > > I implemented it for sure, but in the end I think it was rejected: > > http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/1907 > > > > Re-reading the thread I see why we rejected the bug, but not the patch. > > I think I'll have to resubmit it. > > Yes - had to go re-read myself. As long as we provide both functions - > include and a stronger require - I think this is an easy +1. Yes, that's what my patch was doing. I'll resurrect the patch and post it to puppet-dev this week-end. -- Brice Figureau My Blog: http://www.masterzen.fr/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Puppet Users] Re: Controlling the order of execution of puppet code?
James Turnbull schrieb: > Brice Figureau wrote: > >> On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 11:55 +0200, Peter Meier wrote: >> >>> Hi >>> >>> Only way I know is to make individual objects depend on other objects. Can't do it at class level... I think there is a feature request somewhere in the system for this, because I'd like it as well... >>> hmm did I only dream that in the upcoming release there will be a >>> require (or something like that) keyword to include a class and >>> require it. Unfortunately I'm not able to find the appropriate bug >>> report. >>> >> I implemented it for sure, but in the end I think it was rejected: >> http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/1907 >> >> Re-reading the thread I see why we rejected the bug, but not the patch. >> I think I'll have to resubmit it. >> > > Yes - had to go re-read myself. As long as we provide both functions - > include and a stronger require - I think this is an easy +1. > > Regards > > James Turnbull > > Yes, that will be great when require for classes comes in. With this I can much more control, how puppet evaluates the configuration. Thanks! Philipp --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Puppet Users] Re: Controlling the order of execution of puppet code?
Junhao schrieb:
> Greg wrote:
>
>> Only way I know is to make individual objects depend on other objects.
>> Can't do it at
>> class level... I think there is a feature request somewhere in the
>> system for this, because
>> I'd like it as well...
>>
>> Greg
>>
>> On May 27, 9:56 pm, philipp Hanselmann
>> wrote:
>>
>>> May somebody has answer ...
>>>
>>> How can I ensure that certain classes get executed on the client side
>>> before the other ones do?
>>>
>>> Have a look on the example:
>>>
>>> class AA
>>> case $operatingsystem {
>>> "redhat": { include AA::do-first }
>>> default: {}
>>> }
>>> include AA::software
>>> include AA::desktop
>>> }
>>>
>>> class AA::do-first {
>>> # do an rhn_register
>>> exec { "register-system":
>>> command => "rm -f /etc/sysconfig/rhn/systemid ; rhnreg_ks
>>> --force --serverUrl=https://$rhn_server/XMLRPC
>>> --sslCACert=/usr/share/rhn/RHN-ORG-TRUSTED-SSL-CERT
>>> --activationkey=$activation_key",
>>> logoutput => true,
>>> unless => "/usr/sbin/rhn_check",
>>> tag => register-system,
>>> }
>>>
>>> }
>>> class AA::software {
>>> # do someting after AA::do-first
>>> }
>>> class AA::desktop {
>>> # do something after AA::do-first
>>> }
>>>
>>> For an Redhat system the resource(s) in AA::do-first should run before
>>> the resource(s) in AA::software & AA::desktop.
>>>
>>> Is their an simple way for that?
>>>
>>> An other wish would be: If Exec "register-system" fails, puppet should
>>> stop his execution without do go through the class AA::software &
>>> AA::desktop.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the help!
>>>
>>> Philipp
>>>
>
> What about:
>
> module AA:
> class AA {}
> class AA::do-first {
$myvariable
> }
> class AA::software inherits AA::do-first {}
> class AA::desktop inherits AA::do-first {}
>
> node foo:
>
> node foo {
> import "AA"
> include AA::desktop
> }
>
> Junhao
>
>
Hi Janhao
Even this works, I had issues with the scope of my global defined
variables, so I decided to replace all my inherits code trough
include(s). Since than puppet handle my variables like expected.
So not really willing to go back.
I must commit up to date I couldn't understand the advances of using
class inheritance comparing to include statements ...
class master {
# do something
}
class slave inherits master {
# do something
}
OR
class master {
# do something
}
class slave {
include master
# do something
}
What are differences execpt to get issues with the variable scope in
inheritanced classes?
Philipp
> >
>
>
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Puppet Users] Re: Controlling the order of execution of puppet code?
Brice Figureau wrote: > On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 11:55 +0200, Peter Meier wrote: >> Hi >> >>> Only way I know is to make individual objects depend on other objects. >>> Can't do it at >>> class level... I think there is a feature request somewhere in the >>> system for this, because >>> I'd like it as well... >> hmm did I only dream that in the upcoming release there will be a >> require (or something like that) keyword to include a class and >> require it. Unfortunately I'm not able to find the appropriate bug >> report. > > I implemented it for sure, but in the end I think it was rejected: > http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/1907 > > Re-reading the thread I see why we rejected the bug, but not the patch. > I think I'll have to resubmit it. Yes - had to go re-read myself. As long as we provide both functions - include and a stronger require - I think this is an easy +1. Regards James Turnbull -- Author of: * Pro Linux Systems Administration (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1430219122/) * Pulling Strings with Puppet (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1590599780/) * Pro Nagios 2.0 (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1590596099/) * Hardening Linux (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/159059/) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[Puppet Users] Re: Controlling the order of execution of puppet code?
Hi > yeah I objected because of changing the behaviour of include. But I > thought that it was implemented with a different keyword, which wouldn't > change the behaviour of include. > > Something like a "stronger" include and I thought it have been called > required. > > But maybe I'm wrong. and rereading it with full concentration I see that it should be called reuqire. :) cheers pete --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Puppet Users] Re: Controlling the order of execution of puppet code?
Hi > I implemented it for sure, but in the end I think it was rejected: > http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/1907 > > Re-reading the thread I see why we rejected the bug, but not the patch. > I think I'll have to resubmit it. yeah I objected because of changing the behaviour of include. But I thought that it was implemented with a different keyword, which wouldn't change the behaviour of include. Something like a "stronger" include and I thought it have been called required. But maybe I'm wrong. cheers pete --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Puppet Users] Re: Controlling the order of execution of puppet code?
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 11:55 +0200, Peter Meier wrote: > Hi > > > Only way I know is to make individual objects depend on other objects. > > Can't do it at > > class level... I think there is a feature request somewhere in the > > system for this, because > > I'd like it as well... > > hmm did I only dream that in the upcoming release there will be a > require (or something like that) keyword to include a class and > require it. Unfortunately I'm not able to find the appropriate bug > report. I implemented it for sure, but in the end I think it was rejected: http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/1907 Re-reading the thread I see why we rejected the bug, but not the patch. I think I'll have to resubmit it. -- Brice Figureau My Blog: http://www.masterzen.fr/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Puppet Users] Re: Controlling the order of execution of puppet code?
Hi > Only way I know is to make individual objects depend on other objects. > Can't do it at > class level... I think there is a feature request somewhere in the > system for this, because > I'd like it as well... hmm did I only dream that in the upcoming release there will be a require (or something like that) keyword to include a class and require it. Unfortunately I'm not able to find the appropriate bug report. cheers pete --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Puppet Users] Re: Controlling the order of execution of puppet code?
Greg wrote:
> Only way I know is to make individual objects depend on other objects.
> Can't do it at
> class level... I think there is a feature request somewhere in the
> system for this, because
> I'd like it as well...
>
> Greg
>
> On May 27, 9:56 pm, philipp Hanselmann
> wrote:
>> May somebody has answer ...
>>
>> How can I ensure that certain classes get executed on the client side
>> before the other ones do?
>>
>> Have a look on the example:
>>
>> class AA
>> case $operatingsystem {
>> "redhat": { include AA::do-first }
>> default: {}
>> }
>> include AA::software
>> include AA::desktop
>> }
>>
>> class AA::do-first {
>> # do an rhn_register
>> exec { "register-system":
>> command => "rm -f /etc/sysconfig/rhn/systemid ; rhnreg_ks
>> --force --serverUrl=https://$rhn_server/XMLRPC
>> --sslCACert=/usr/share/rhn/RHN-ORG-TRUSTED-SSL-CERT
>> --activationkey=$activation_key",
>> logoutput => true,
>> unless => "/usr/sbin/rhn_check",
>> tag => register-system,
>> }
>>
>> }
>> class AA::software {
>> # do someting after AA::do-first
>> }
>> class AA::desktop {
>> # do something after AA::do-first
>> }
>>
>> For an Redhat system the resource(s) in AA::do-first should run before
>> the resource(s) in AA::software & AA::desktop.
>>
>> Is their an simple way for that?
>>
>> An other wish would be: If Exec "register-system" fails, puppet should
>> stop his execution without do go through the class AA::software &
>> AA::desktop.
>>
>> Thanks for the help!
>>
>> Philipp
What about:
module AA:
class AA {}
class AA::do-first {}
class AA::software inherits AA::do-first {}
class AA::desktop inherits AA::do-first {}
node foo:
node foo {
import "AA"
include AA::desktop
}
Junhao
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Puppet Users] Re: Controlling the order of execution of puppet code?
Only way I know is to make individual objects depend on other objects.
Can't do it at
class level... I think there is a feature request somewhere in the
system for this, because
I'd like it as well...
Greg
On May 27, 9:56 pm, philipp Hanselmann
wrote:
> May somebody has answer ...
>
> How can I ensure that certain classes get executed on the client side
> before the other ones do?
>
> Have a look on the example:
>
> class AA
> case $operatingsystem {
> "redhat": { include AA::do-first }
> default: {}
> }
> include AA::software
> include AA::desktop
> }
>
> class AA::do-first {
> # do an rhn_register
> exec { "register-system":
> command => "rm -f /etc/sysconfig/rhn/systemid ; rhnreg_ks
> --force --serverUrl=https://$rhn_server/XMLRPC
> --sslCACert=/usr/share/rhn/RHN-ORG-TRUSTED-SSL-CERT
> --activationkey=$activation_key",
> logoutput => true,
> unless => "/usr/sbin/rhn_check",
> tag => register-system,
> }
>
> }
> class AA::software {
> # do someting after AA::do-first
> }
> class AA::desktop {
> # do something after AA::do-first
> }
>
> For an Redhat system the resource(s) in AA::do-first should run before
> the resource(s) in AA::software & AA::desktop.
>
> Is their an simple way for that?
>
> An other wish would be: If Exec "register-system" fails, puppet should
> stop his execution without do go through the class AA::software &
> AA::desktop.
>
> Thanks for the help!
>
> Philipp
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
