[pygtk] PyGTK in the standard Library
I realise I'm quite new to this list but I've been working with PyGTK for a while now and would welcome peoples feedback on something. please put me straight if I'm treading on toes, or reiterating an old discussion. There have been several discussions on the list in the last few months about trying to get PyGTK into the standard library, and whilst attending europython recently I had an opportunity to steer conversations in that direction with a lot of people to get a feel for the (european at least) communities take on this, most of the people I spoke to where non PyGTK folks, and the opinions seemed to be generally favourable. there where however a few buts... 1. Documentation - this is something that has been discussed on the list quite a few times and actually I think the exsisting free docs are perfectly adequate it seemed to mostly come from people who had tried PyGTK back in the day (when I seem to remember there wasn't a lot of documentation) 2. Windows - many people seemed surprised that GTK ran on windows at all and others had been put of by all the various different ways of doing it, I have been reading the [Installation Problems on Win32] thread that seems to be raging on so I'll just add my two pence worth from what I've gathered so far the python community at large and the maintainers of the standard libraries would want a simple drop it in installer for the basic gtk runtime (a la dropline). 3.Idle - Actually most people seemed to be oblivious to Idle but I can see it would have to be ported to GTK (almost re-written) and this is where I come in, I've already been doing some stuff with a simple text editor written in python and PyGTK and I have some time available so if no one else wants the job I'll take it on, help would be appreciated or if someone else wants the job (or has already started it), my help is offered. So is this something the PyGTK community wants to see happen? I for one would love to see PyGTK in the standard distro, (Tk is so long in the tooth its untrue) and am willing to put in some work to see it happen, so if its already happening put me to work!, if not could we make it happen?? thanks for taking the time to read this Matt ___ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
Re: [pygtk] How to hack gdesklets to work with 2.4
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 10:12:06AM +0200, Johan Dahlin wrote: : fre 2004-06-18 klockan 02.32 skrev Jonathon McKitrick: : I don't use autoconf, but I'd like to install gdesklets, and it won't let : me, since it doesn't find pygtk. I have the 2.4 beta installed. : : You need to set PKG_CONFIG_PATH to the correct directory before running : configure. If you installed PyGTK 2.3.x in /usr/local, it should be : something like this: : : export PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/lib/pkgconfig : : And before running you need to set pythonpath. : : export PYTHONPATH=/usr/local/lib/pythonX.Y/site-packages : : where X.Y is the python version, usually 2.3 these days. And this will work on FreeBSD as well? jm ___ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
Re: [pygtk] PyGTK in the standard Library
Well - I have to say - I just joined the list a very short time ago, and just contributed a bit here and there to pygtk, but this email really inspired me to write about point n.3. My dream would really to be able to see gnome apps using a PyGTK-thing that worked like VBA - please dont kill me just yet, I will try to explain myself. A thing I really miss in the whole Gnome experience, is something like what you can do in Word, Powerpoint, and other Windows apps that use COM and VB. Now, I hear you say: But we can do that! We have bonobo! And the app developer has to add support for plugins. All you have to do is use your favorite editor/RAD and write the application. This is what I think could be improved - If there was some sort of VBA-like thing using PyGTK, that you can just attach to your application, that would make things so nice. I believe everything from an infrastructure point of view is already there: * Bonobo + the pygtk bonobo bindings * PyGTK * gtksourceview * insert some GUI builder here Well - I know - it is a lot of work to put these things together, and then a lot of politics to convince people to use it. But I guess, if I had time to do it, I would try. One issue I see with the acceptance of this is that (I may be completely wrong here) some people may see Mono as the silver bullet for this problem. I am not that familiar with Mono to say for sure. Ah. Feel much better now :) --- Matthew Bull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I realise I'm quite new to this list but I've been working with PyGTK for a while now and would welcome peoples feedback on something. please put me straight if I'm treading on toes, or reiterating an old discussion. There have been several discussions on the list in the last few months about trying to get PyGTK into the standard library, and whilst attending europython recently I had an opportunity to steer conversations in that direction with a lot of people to get a feel for the (european at least) communities take on this, most of the people I spoke to where non PyGTK folks, and the opinions seemed to be generally favourable. there where however a few buts... 1. Documentation - this is something that has been discussed on the list quite a few times and actually I think the exsisting free docs are perfectly adequate it seemed to mostly come from people who had tried PyGTK back in the day (when I seem to remember there wasn't a lot of documentation) 2. Windows - many people seemed surprised that GTK ran on windows at all and others had been put of by all the various different ways of doing it, I have been reading the [Installation Problems on Win32] thread that seems to be raging on so I'll just add my two pence worth from what I've gathered so far the python community at large and the maintainers of the standard libraries would want a simple drop it in installer for the basic gtk runtime (a la dropline). 3.Idle - Actually most people seemed to be oblivious to Idle but I can see it would have to be ported to GTK (almost re-written) and this is where I come in, I've already been doing some stuff with a simple text editor written in python and PyGTK and I have some time available so if no one else wants the job I'll take it on, help would be appreciated or if someone else wants the job (or has already started it), my help is offered. So is this something the PyGTK community wants to see happen? I for one would love to see PyGTK in the standard distro, (Tk is so long in the tooth its untrue) and am willing to put in some work to see it happen, so if its already happening put me to work!, if not could we make it happen?? thanks for taking the time to read this Matt ___ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/ __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail ___ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
Re: [pygtk] How to hack gdesklets to work with 2.4
And this will work on FreeBSD as well? Yes, it should work on all system where autotools passes. -- Johan Dahlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
Re: [pygtk] PyGTK in the standard Library
While I think that in principle this would be a good idea, there are some management issues that would need to be resolved, such as: 1- PyGTK wraps GTK+ for Python. Which life-cycle do we follow, GTK's or Python's? 2- Do we keep PyGTK's bugzilla, or use sourceforge's bug tracker (ugh!) to integrate better with python; 3- What happens to pyorbit and gnome-python? They probably don't belong in python, anyway, but I needed to raise this point... 4- Someone might bring up political question regarding the inclusion of pygtk in detriment of pyqt; in particular, KDE's more intense enthusiasts (=fanatics:) may stop liking python because of the inclusion of pygtk; In spite of these issues, there are many advantages of including pygtk, as you all know. But it also depends on the degree of freedom that python's maintainers would be willing to give to pygtk developers, I think... Just my 0.02 ¤... A Sex, 2004-06-18 às 10:27, Matthew Bull escreveu: I realise I'm quite new to this list but I've been working with PyGTK for a while now and would welcome peoples feedback on something. please put me straight if I'm treading on toes, or reiterating an old discussion. There have been several discussions on the list in the last few months about trying to get PyGTK into the standard library, and whilst attending europython recently I had an opportunity to steer conversations in that direction with a lot of people to get a feel for the (european at least) communities take on this, most of the people I spoke to where non PyGTK folks, and the opinions seemed to be generally favourable. there where however a few buts... 1. Documentation - this is something that has been discussed on the list quite a few times and actually I think the exsisting free docs are perfectly adequate it seemed to mostly come from people who had tried PyGTK back in the day (when I seem to remember there wasn't a lot of documentation) 2. Windows - many people seemed surprised that GTK ran on windows at all and others had been put of by all the various different ways of doing it, I have been reading the [Installation Problems on Win32] thread that seems to be raging on so I'll just add my two pence worth from what I've gathered so far the python community at large and the maintainers of the standard libraries would want a simple drop it in installer for the basic gtk runtime (a la dropline). 3.Idle - Actually most people seemed to be oblivious to Idle but I can see it would have to be ported to GTK (almost re-written) and this is where I come in, I've already been doing some stuff with a simple text editor written in python and PyGTK and I have some time available so if no one else wants the job I'll take it on, help would be appreciated or if someone else wants the job (or has already started it), my help is offered. So is this something the PyGTK community wants to see happen? I for one would love to see PyGTK in the standard distro, (Tk is so long in the tooth its untrue) and am willing to put in some work to see it happen, so if its already happening put me to work!, if not could we make it happen?? thanks for taking the time to read this Matt ___ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/ -- Gustavo João Alves Marques Carneiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] The universe is always one step beyond logic. ___ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
Re: [pygtk] PyGTK in the standard Library
Matt There have been several discussions on the list in the last few Matt months about trying to get PyGTK into the standard library, ... Matt there where however a few buts... Matt 1. Documentation - ... Matt 2. Windows - ... Matt 3.Idle - ... 4. Mac OSX - Is GTK available on Mac OSX without X11? Tkinter does have the advantage that TkAqua is available for non-X environments. -- Skip Montanaro Got gigs? http://www.musi-cal.com/submit.html Got spam? http://www.spambayes.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
[pygtk] New subscriber, asking about embedding
Hi there boys and girls! I'm a new PyGTK user, I'm developing a C application using the GNOME framework, it's a VGA Planets client called GNOME War Pad (http://gwp.lunix.com.ar), and I'm starting to use PyGTK's codegen feature to wrap my GObjects inside Python objects...it works great although I'm just starting to do things with it. What I need is to be able to share living objects between C and Python code, so the Python scrips could manipulate directly the game's objects. For example, I have a GwpShip GObject (C code), and from python I want to get an existing ship object to change some parameter, I don't know if there's a direct way to do that, I searched the docs on the website but didn't found any reference, anyone can help me? Best regards, -- Lucas Di Pentima - Santa Fe, Argentina - Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] LUNIX S.R.L. - Soluciones en GNU/Linux - http://www.lunix.com.ar GnuPG Public Key: http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x6AA54FC9 Key fingerprint = BD3B 08C4 661A 8C3B 1855 740C 8F98 3FCF 6AA5 4FC9 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
Re: [pygtk] New subscriber, asking about embedding
Ouch! I think I've found the answer on the FAQ :-) http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/index.py?querytype=simplequery=PyGObjectreq=search Lucas Di Pentima wrote: Hi there boys and girls! I'm a new PyGTK user, I'm developing a C application using the GNOME [...] there's a direct way to do that, I searched the docs on the website but didn't found any reference, anyone can help me? -- Lucas Di Pentima - Santa Fe, Argentina - Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] LUNIX S.R.L. - Soluciones en GNU/Linux - http://www.lunix.com.ar GnuPG Public Key: http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x6AA54FC9 Key fingerprint = BD3B 08C4 661A 8C3B 1855 740C 8F98 3FCF 6AA5 4FC9 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
Re: [pygtk] PyGTK in the standard Library
On Fri, 2004-06-18 at 13:41, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote: While I think that in principle this would be a good idea, there are some management issues that would need to be resolved, such as: 1- PyGTK wraps GTK+ for Python. Which life-cycle do we follow, GTK's or Python's? Both this point and the one below are best answered by the library developers, if they are in favour of the idea of course :^) (I should make it clear I _use_ pyGTK, I'm not a developer) although to me following the GTK lifecycle then the python 'standard' version being the stable version at the time of the python release would make sense... GTK and PyGTK release cycles seem to be much faster than pythons 2- Do we keep PyGTK's bugzilla, or use sourceforge's bug tracker (ugh!) to integrate better with python; 3- What happens to pyorbit and gnome-python? They probably don't belong in python, anyway, but I needed to raise this point... they are essentially seperate right?? (although they do depend on pyGTK) so not really an issue, for instance I use Gnome but I only have PyGTK on my linux boxes 4- Someone might bring up political question regarding the inclusion of pygtk in detriment of pyqt; in particular, KDE's more intense enthusiasts (=fanatics:) may stop liking python because of the inclusion of pygtk; Interestingly I did have a few people say 'well what about PyQT' but no one mentioned WxPython (which I expected) although even people using PyQT pretty much agreed it wasn't really suitable its a very big library and it includes a lot of stuff that is already in the standard libs (qtsql for instance), and on linux I'm not sure that the packaging would change, (most linux distros package tkinter seperately anyhow) In spite of these issues, there are many advantages of including pygtk, as you all know. But it also depends on the degree of freedom that python's maintainers would be willing to give to pygtk developers, I think... Just my 0.02 ¤... A Sex, 2004-06-18 às 10:27, Matthew Bull escreveu: I realise I'm quite new to this list but I've been working with PyGTK for a while now and would welcome peoples feedback on something. please put me straight if I'm treading on toes, or reiterating an old discussion. There have been several discussions on the list in the last few months about trying to get PyGTK into the standard library, and whilst attending europython recently I had an opportunity to steer conversations in that direction with a lot of people to get a feel for the (european at least) communities take on this, most of the people I spoke to where non PyGTK folks, and the opinions seemed to be generally favourable. there where however a few buts... 1. Documentation - this is something that has been discussed on the list quite a few times and actually I think the exsisting free docs are perfectly adequate it seemed to mostly come from people who had tried PyGTK back in the day (when I seem to remember there wasn't a lot of documentation) 2. Windows - many people seemed surprised that GTK ran on windows at all and others had been put of by all the various different ways of doing it, I have been reading the [Installation Problems on Win32] thread that seems to be raging on so I'll just add my two pence worth from what I've gathered so far the python community at large and the maintainers of the standard libraries would want a simple drop it in installer for the basic gtk runtime (a la dropline). 3.Idle - Actually most people seemed to be oblivious to Idle but I can see it would have to be ported to GTK (almost re-written) and this is where I come in, I've already been doing some stuff with a simple text editor written in python and PyGTK and I have some time available so if no one else wants the job I'll take it on, help would be appreciated or if someone else wants the job (or has already started it), my help is offered. So is this something the PyGTK community wants to see happen? I for one would love to see PyGTK in the standard distro, (Tk is so long in the tooth its untrue) and am willing to put in some work to see it happen, so if its already happening put me to work!, if not could we make it happen?? thanks for taking the time to read this Matt ___ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/ ___ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
Re: [pygtk] PyGTK in the standard Library
On Fri, 2004-06-18 at 13:59, Skip Montanaro wrote: Matt There have been several discussions on the list in the last few Matt months about trying to get PyGTK into the standard library, ... Matt there where however a few buts... Matt 1. Documentation - ... Matt 2. Windows - ... Matt 3.Idle - ... 4. Mac OSX - Is GTK available on Mac OSX without X11? Tkinter does have the advantage that TkAqua is available for non-X environments. AFAIK no. but just to clear up a point I don't think anyones proposing that PyGTK replace Tkinter at this point. ___ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
Re: [pygtk] how to print from pygtk?
Ivan Brkanac escribió: Hello I would like to do some printing from pygtk (on windows) how can it be done I haw data in text buffer and it needs to go to printer, as I searched documentation I couldn't find anything here in the pyGestor project we are using reportlab http://www.reportlab.org/, and acrobat reader as preview manager. regards -- Fernando San Martín Woernercounter.li.org Linux User #216550 Jefe Depto. InformáticaGalilea S.A. Talca, VII Región Chile(56)71-224876 GNOME Foundation Membershiphttp://pygestor.gnome.cl ___ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
Re: [pygtk] PyGTK in the standard Library
1- PyGTK wraps GTK+ for Python. Which life-cycle do we follow, GTK's or Python's? Matt Both this point and the one below are best answered by the library Matt developers, if they are in favour of the idea of course :^) (I Matt should make it clear I _use_ pyGTK, I'm not a developer) although Matt to me following the GTK lifecycle then the python 'standard' Matt version being the stable version at the time of the python release Matt would make sense... GTK and PyGTK release cycles seem to be much Matt faster than pythons I haven't used PyGTK enough to know, but is the GTK community's stance on breakage similar to that in the Python community? If not, simply shipping with the stable version of PyGTK when Python is released may cause more perceived Python breakage than that community normally expects. Skip ___ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
Re: [pygtk] PyGTK in the standard Library
Hi all, as no nativ english speaker, I ask in advance for pardon because my bad english. 1. Documentation - this is something that has been discussed on the list quite a few times and actually I think the exsisting free docs are perfectly adequate it seemed to mostly come from people who had tried PyGTK back in the day (when I seem to remember there wasn't a lot of documentation) Your're right. It isn't easy to get some things to work. So I tried handled tables, but the documentation failed to existed. So I'm working with some scripts, to gasp the concept. Second, as beginner it's difficult to understand the different ways to work with pygtk as written in the tutorial. For experiened programmers is helpful to find new styles. 3.Idle - Actually most people seemed to be oblivious to Idle but I can see it would have to be ported to GTK (almost re-written) and this is where I come in, I've already been doing some stuff with a simple text editor written in python and PyGTK and I have some time available so if no one else wants the job I'll take it on, help would be appreciated or if someone else wants the job (or has already started it), my help is offered. So is this something the PyGTK community wants to see happen? I for one would love to see PyGTK in the standard distro, (Tk is so long in the tooth its untrue) and am willing to put in some work to see it happen, so if its already happening put me to work!, if not could we make it happen?? I thought a while ago about this question and tried to convert idle to gtk. It was like hell, since I was new to python and gtk. I think it the best to seperate the functionality of idle from the gui. So it would be quite easy to port it to anothers gui. As disadvantage it would be a little bit slower by this way of programming. Distribution: If there is an easy way to get the modules pygtk and gtk itself, it would be easier to distribute it separatly from python like the package win32all by Marc Hammond. Bye, Volker -- Sie haben neue Mails! - Die GMX Toolbar informiert Sie beim Surfen! Jetzt aktivieren unter http://www.gmx.net/info -- Sie haben neue Mails! - Die GMX Toolbar informiert Sie beim Surfen! Jetzt aktivieren unter http://www.gmx.net/info ___ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
Re: [pygtk] how to print from pygtk?
Christian Robottom Reis escribió: On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 03:11:28PM +0200, Ivan Brkanac wrote: I would like to do some printing from pygtk (on windows) how can it be done I haw data in text buffer and it needs to go to printer, as I searched If you want to use GNOME's printing facilities, one alternative is using the gnome-print bindings that Gustavo started a while ago. I'm not sure in what state they are in, but I suspect they do work. Another alternative (mentioned here already) is generating PS/PDF via reportlab (www.reportlab.org) and printing using invocation of the lpr binary itself. i understand Ivan is working on win32 platform, so the gnome-print bindings are unavaible, reportlab is the only one choice, on the other hand if he is using linux the bindings should be a solution, there was post in this mailing list from Pier Carteri with some code using gnome-print and class PrinAssistant very useful, Ivan should check the mail archive in october or november i guess regards -- Fernando San Martín Woernercounter.li.org Linux User #216550 Jefe Depto. InformáticaGalilea S.A. Talca, VII Región Chile(56)71-224876 GNOME Foundation Membershiphttp://pygestor.gnome.cl ___ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
Re: [pygtk] Codegen question
I tried replacing gint* with int* and got the same message, I
suppose I'm doing something wrong, any ideas?
You'll have to do something like this in your .override file:
%%
override gwp_ship_get_waypoint noargs
static PyObject *
_wrap_gwp_ship_get_waypoint (PyObject *self)
{
int wp_x, wp_y;
gwp_ship_get_waypoint (GWP_SHIP (self-obj), wp_x, wp_y);
return Py_BuildValue((ii), wp_x, wp_y);
}
--
Johan Dahlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk
Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
Re: [pygtk] PyGTK in the standard Library
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 10:27:28AM +0100, Matthew Bull wrote: There have been several discussions on the list in the last few months about trying to get PyGTK into the standard library, and whilst attending europython recently I had an opportunity to steer conversations in that direction with a lot of people to get a feel for the (european at least) communities take on this, most of the people I spoke to where non PyGTK folks, and the opinions seemed to be generally favourable. [snip numerous arguments in favor of including pygtk] Summarizing the issues presented in this thread, we have the following topics that want evaluation: - Combined Release - API Stability - Tkinter, KDE and Python advocacy - Non-GTK+ packages - MacOS functionality - Use of Python's development infrastructure - Distribution of documentation I'm not even going to try fleshing these out, but whoever wants to argue about inclusion needs to take these into serious consideration. One thing that popped up were two potential projects that somebody with some free time or a lot of love for Python and PyGTK could try tackling: - IDLE Port - Integrated RAD Tool Thanks for chipping in with opinions and proposals, -- Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 261 2331 ___ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
[pygtk] Windows capture webcam (offtopic)...
Hello. I know this is a little offtopic.. but i'm developing a program and want to choose python as the prog. language. The only problem i have to choose it, is that i need to capture images from a USB webcam. The plataform is windows.. I have the ddls and all... If i could capture image from within python, it would be grate, and definitly use python all the way. What would be the (best) way to capture from a webcam device using python? Thanks you in advance, -- Phillip Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
[pygtk] Image as background of textview
Hello all, is it possible to add an image as a background of a textview using pygtk? If not is it possible to do it in C based Gtk+? Thank you all in advance, Tiago Cogumbreiro ___ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
Re: [pygtk] Windows capture webcam (offtopic)...
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 09:38:51PM +, Phillip Neumann wrote: I have the ddls and all... If i could capture image from within python, it would be grate, and definitly use python all the way. What would be the (best) way to capture from a webcam device using python? If you have the driver DLLs, there might be a way to load and access their API functions calldll from Mark Hammond's win32all package, but don't quote me on that. It includes documentation in the download package: https://sourceforge.net/projects/pywin32/ There's an example of calldll use here: http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=u8yxydzw1.fsf%40fitlinxx.com Disclaimer: I don't know how to use Microsoft Word, let alone call APIs in Win32 DLLs from Python. But then again, nobody else *really* does -- that is, apart from Mark. Take care, -- Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 261 2331 ___ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
