Re: [pygtk] Re: Non-member submission from Joe Van Andel
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Joseph VanAndel wrote: > So, if I need to wrap gtk+extra now, should I just use SWIG, but plan on > using ExtensionClass later? If all you want to do is use the GtkExtra widget library with python, go to: http://home.pages.de/~voegele/gtkextra.html (this link is in the links section on the GtkExtra web page). I thought you were talking about porting it to the unstable ExtensionClass branch of pygtk (which as the name suggests could change, breaking your bindings). > > > By the way on the subject line, what does > "Non-member submission from Joe Van Andel" > mean? The address you posted from was not on the mailing list, so it got bounced to the mailing list maintainer (me). I have added your address to the post-only list, which is why your second message didn't bounce. > > Who is a "member"? James. -- Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.daa.com.au/~james/ - To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pygtk] Re: Non-member submission from Joe Van Andel
James Henstridge wrote: > > > > > Are you planning to proceed with this approach? If I wanted to wrap > > gtk+extra-0.99.5, is using the Extension class approach a good idea? > > Yes. After figuring out some of the bugs, it looks like using > ExtensionClass is the way to go. I am slowly converting over the rest of > pygtk/gnome-python (I have also been working on other projects, which is > why I haven't done too much recently). > > I am still working out some of the bugs, so it is probably a good idea to > wait before converting over pygtk addons. So, if I need to wrap gtk+extra now, should I just use SWIG, but plan on using ExtensionClass later? By the way on the subject line, what does "Non-member submission from Joe Van Andel" mean? Who is a "member"? - To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pygtk] Re: Non-member submission from Joe Van Andel
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The 'configure' script needs updating: > arrayobject.h now is included as > > #include Well, the numeric python features for the extension class based pygtk are not implemented yet, but I should fix this. > > Are you planning to proceed with this approach? If I wanted to wrap > gtk+extra-0.99.5, is using the Extension class approach a good idea? Yes. After figuring out some of the bugs, it looks like using ExtensionClass is the way to go. I am slowly converting over the rest of pygtk/gnome-python (I have also been working on other projects, which is why I haven't done too much recently). I am still working out some of the bugs, so it is probably a good idea to wait before converting over pygtk addons. > > Thanks much! > James. -- Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.daa.com.au/~james/ - To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
