Re: What is elegant way to do configuration on server app
Jerry OELoo oylje...@gmail.com writes: Currently, I can just think out that I put status into a configure file, and service schedule read this file and get status value, That sounds like a fine start. Some advice: * You may be tempted to make the configuration file executable (e.g. Python code). Resist that temptation; keep it *much* simpler, a non-executable data format. Python's standard library has the ‘configparser’ module URL:https://docs.python.org/3/library/configparser.html to parse and provide the values from a very common configuration file format. Use that unless you have a good reason not to. * Your program can “poll” the configuration file to see whether it has changed. At startup, read the config file's modification timestamp URL:https://docs.python.org/3/library/os.html#os.stat_result.st_mtime. Make a part of your event loop (assuming your server runs an event loop) that wakes up every N seconds (e.g. every 60 seconds) and checkes the file's modification timestamp again; if it's newer, record that value for future comparisons, then re-read the file for its values. Hope that helps. -- \ “For your convenience we recommend courteous, efficient | `\self-service.” —supermarket, Hong Kong | _o__) | Ben Finney -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[issue23782] Leak in _PyTraceback_Add
New submission from Serhiy Storchaka: There is a leak of fetched exception in _PyTraceback_Add() (Python/traceback.c:146). -- messages: 239319 nosy: georg.brandl, haypo, serhiy.storchaka priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Leak in _PyTraceback_Add type: resource usage ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23782 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23780] Surprising behaviour when passing list to os.path.join.
Boštjan Mejak (Pikec) added the comment: Using Python 3.4.3 on Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit, Service Pack 1: import os os.path.join([1, 2, 3]) Traceback (most recent call last): File stdin, line 1, in module File C:\Program Files\Python 3.4\lib\ntpath.py, line 108, in join result_drive, result_path = splitdrive(path) File C:\Program Files\Python 3.4\lib\ntpath.py, line 161, in splitdrive normp = p.replace(_get_altsep(p), sep) AttributeError: 'list' object has no attribute 'replace' I think this atribute error should be handled differently, like informing the programmer that you cannot use a list in the join method. -- nosy: +Boštjan Mejak (Pikec) ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23780 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18408] Fixes crashes found by pyfailmalloc
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset b742c1c5c0bf by Victor Stinner in branch 'default': PEP 490: add issue 18408 https://hg.python.org/peps/rev/b742c1c5c0bf -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18408 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23781] Add private _PyErr_ReplaceException() in 2.7
STINNER Victor added the comment: FIY I'm working on a draft of new PEP to chain exceptions at C level: PEP 490. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23781 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: Sudoku solver
Marko Rauhamaa ma...@pacujo.net wrote in message news:87r3sdnw5t@elektro.pacujo.net... I post below a sudoku solver. I eagerly await neater implementations (as well as bug reports). Here is another python-based sudoku solver - http://www.ics.uci.edu/~eppstein/PADS/Sudoku.py From its docstring - A proper Sudoku puzzle must have a unique solution, and it should be possible to reach that solution by a sequence of logical deductions without trial and error. To the extent possible, we strive to keep the same ethic in our automated solver, by mimicking human rule-based reasoning, rather than resorting to brute force backtracking search. A neat feature is that, having printed the solution, it then lists every step it took in its reasoning process to arrive at the solution. It solved Marko's original puzzle and Ian's puzzle in less than a second. It could not solve Marko's second one, returning impossible immediately. Here is another one that does not use python, but uses SQL - https://www.sqlite.org/lang_with.html You will find it at the bottom of the page, under the heading Outlandish Recursive Query Examples. Frank Millman -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
RE: Function Defaults - avoiding unneccerary combinations of arguments at input
-Original Message- From: Python-list [mailto:python-list- bounces+webmailgroups=gmail@python.org] On Behalf Of Steven D'Aprano Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 01:49 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: Function Defaults - avoiding unneccerary combinations of arguments at input On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 04:43 am, Ivan Evstegneev wrote: Hello all , Just a little question about function's default arguments. Let's say I have this function: def my_fun(history=False, built=False, current=False, topo=None, full=False, file=None): if currnet and full: do something_1 elif current and file: do something_2 elif history and full and file: do something_3 This is an extreme example that shows why Guido's Law No constant arguments is a good design principle. (Well, it's not really so much a law as a guideline.) If you have a function that looks like this: def spam(arg, flag=True): if flag: return do_this(arg) else: return do_that(arg) then you should just use do_this and do_that directly and get rid of spam. In your case, its hard to say *exactly* what you should do, since you are only showing a small sketch of my_fun, but it looks to me that it tries to do too much. You can probably split it into two or four smaller functions, and avoid needing so many (or any!) flags. That will avoid (or at least reduce) the need to check for mutually incompatible sets of arguments. Another useful design principle: if dealing with the combinations of arguments is too hard, that's a sign that you have too many combinations of arguments. If there are combinations which are impossible, there are three basic ways to deal with that. In order from best to worst: (1) Don't let those combinations occur at all. Redesign your function, or split it into multiple functions, so the impossible combinations no longer exist. (2) Raise an error when an impossible combination occurs. (3) Just ignore one or more argument so that what was impossible is now possible. -- Steven -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list Hello Steven, As I said in a previous mail, main purpose of this arguments is to define what path should be chose. It is actually one xls file that could be placed into various placed within my folder tree. For instance, I have following folder tree: data_lib/ current/ history/ built/ Say I have test.xls that could be in one of those three folders. I wrote a function that reads it out, and its input arguments just define where it should be read. So all those ifs related to path definition. Still now I'm thinking to really split it out... I'll have a separate function for path definition and then it will call a common reader_fun() in order to read this file. Sincerely, Ivan -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[issue23781] Add private _PyErr_ReplaceException() in 2.7
New submission from Serhiy Storchaka: Proposed patch adds internal private function _PyErr_ReplaceException() in 2.7. This functions is like _PyErr_ChainExceptions() in 3.x, but doesn't set the context. It makes the code of 2.x simpler and more similar to 3.x and makes the backporting from 3.x easier. -- components: Interpreter Core files: capi_PyErr_ReplaceException.patch keywords: patch messages: 239317 nosy: haypo, serhiy.storchaka priority: normal severity: normal stage: patch review status: open title: Add private _PyErr_ReplaceException() in 2.7 type: enhancement versions: Python 2.7 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file38697/capi_PyErr_ReplaceException.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23781 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
What is elegant way to do configuration on server app
Hi. I have used python to provide a web service app, it will running 7*24, and it will return some data to client by API. Now I want to add some extra data in return data, ex, status = 1, and I want this value 1 can be configured, that means I can control that service app return status with 0, 1 or other value, and I want to keep service running always. Currently, I can just think out that I put status into a configure file, and service schedule read this file and get status value, Is there any other elegant way to achieve this? What is standard way in python for this requirement? Thanks! Best Regards Jerry -- Rejoice,I Desire! -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[issue23780] Surprising behaviour when passing list to os.path.join.
Changes by Boštjan Mejak bostjan.xpe...@gmail.com: -- versions: +Python 3.5 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23780 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: Supply condition in function call
On 26Mar2015 10:03, Peter Otten __pete...@web.de wrote: Cameron Simpson wrote: vars = locals() varnames = list(vars.keys()) That leaves varnames in undefined order. Consider varnames = sorted(vars) Actually, not necessary. I started with sorted, but it is irrelevant, so I backed off to list to avoid introducing an unwarranted implication, in fact precisely the implicaion you are making. The only requirement, which I mentioned, is that the values used to initialise the namedtuple are supplied in the same order as the tuple field names, so all that is needed is to suck the .keys() out once and use them in the same order when we construct the namedtuple. Hence just a list. Cheers, Cameron Simpson c...@zip.com.au -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: test1
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Tiglath Suriol tiglathsur...@gmail.com wrote: Two possibilities: You are a moderator. If you are a moderator you are welcome to delete my tests posts. This is of course improbably because this newsgroup is not moderated. The other possibility is that you are just a guy, who despite the fact that my posts cost you nothing, and you are absolutely free to ignore them, your life is so dull that that you just must intervene and comment on anything you do not comprehend, because appointing yourself net cop is about as exciting as it gets. It's a free country, I know. You have every right to engage in pathetic speech. To that guy I say: It's safe, you can't go back to watching grass grow. *plonk* -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Supply condition in function call
Cameron Simpson wrote: On 26Mar2015 07:27, Manuel Graune manuel.gra...@koeln.de wrote: Gary Herron gher...@digipen.edu writes: On 03/25/2015 10:29 AM, Manuel Graune wrote: def test1(a, b, condition=True): for i,j in zip(a,b): c=i+j if eval(condition): print(Foo) test1([0,1,2,3],[1,2,3,4],i+j 4) print(Bar) test1([0,1,2,3],[1,2,3,4],c 4) print(Bar) test1([0,1,2,3],[1,2,3,4],a[i] 2) This is nicely done with lambda expressions: To pass in a condition as a function: test1([0,1,2,3],[1,2,3,4], lambda i,j: i+j4) To check the condition in the function: if condition(i,j): This seems to be the right direction and a good solution for simple cases. Unfortunately this: To get the full range of conditions, you will need to include all the variables needed by any condition you can imagine. So the above suggestions may need to be expanded to: ... lambda i,j,a,b: ... or whatever and ... condition(i,j,a,b) ... or whatever is not as concise as I had hoped for. Is there a possibility to do (maybe with a helper function inside the main function's body) solve this more elegantly? I'm thinking of some combination of e. g. **kwargs, dir() and introspection. Yes. Consider locals(): https://docs.python.org/3/library/functions.html#locals which is a built in function returning a copy of the current local variables in a dict. Example: condition_test = lambda vars: vars['i'] + vars[j'] 4 def test1(a, b, condition): for i, j in zip(a,b): c = i + j if condition(locals()): print(Foo) test1([0,1,2,3], [1,2,3,4], condition_test) This passes the local variables inside test1() to condition as a single parameter. Now, I grant that vars['i'] is a miracle of tediousness. So consider this elaboration: from collections import namedtuple condition_test = lambda vars: vars.i + vars.j 4 def test1(a, b, condition): for i, j in zip(a,b): c = i + j vars = locals() varnames = list(vars.keys()) That leaves varnames in undefined order. Consider varnames = sorted(vars) instead or pass the list of arguments explicitly, optionally with some inspect fallback: $ cat pass_condition_inspect.py import inspect def test3(a, b, condition, args=None): if args is None: args = inspect.getargspec(condition).args for i, j in zip(a,b): c = i + j _locals = locals() if condition(*[_locals[name] for name in args]): print(Foo, i, j) def condition(c, i): return i * i c test3([1, 2, 3], [2, 3, 4], condition) print(---) # note reverse order of argument names test3([1, 2, 3], [2, 3, 4], condition, [i, c]) $ python3 pass_condition_inspect.py Foo 3 4 --- Foo 1 2 Foo 2 3 Foo 3 4 A simpler alternative is changing the signature of condition() and passing keyword arguments: $ cat pass_condition.py def test2(a, b, condition): for i, j in zip(a,b): c = i + j if condition(**locals()): print(Foo, i, j) def condition(c, i, **unused): return i * i c test2([1, 2, 3], [2, 3, 4], condition) $ python3 pass_condition.py Foo 3 4 Creating a locals() dict on every iteration is still costly, and personally I would prefer the tighter interface where you pass a limited set of arguments explicitly. varstupletype = namedtuple(locals, varnames) varstuple = varstupletype(*[ vars[k] for k in varnames ]) if condition(varstuple): print(Foo) Here, the condition_test function/lambda uses vars.i and vars.j, which i think you'll agree is easier to read and write. The price is the construction of a namedtuple to hold the variable name values. See: https://docs.python.org/3/library/collections.html#collections.namedtuple So the (untested) code above: - get the locals() as before - get the names of the variables; it is important to have this in a array because we need to access the values in the same order when we make the tuple - make a new namedtuple class varstupletype, which is used to make the named tuple - make the named tuple itself with the values of the variables in order If you're writing a lot of test functions like test1 you can push the namedtuple stuff off into a helper function: def vartuple(vars): varnames = list(vars.keys()) varstupletype = namedtuple(locals, varnames) varstuple = varstupletype(*[ vars[k] for k in varnames ]) return varstuple and then test1() can look like this: def test1(a, b, condition): for i, j in zip(a,b): c = i + j if condition(vartuple(locals())): print(Foo) which makes it much easier to write test2 and so on later. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: module attributes and docstrings
Sorry for the late reply. We experienced a 3 day blackout following one of the most amazing thunderstorms I've witnessed in my life. On Tue, 24 Mar 2015 22:49:49 +1100, Steven D'Aprano steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote: On Tue, 24 Mar 2015 07:55 pm, Mario Figueiredo wrote: Reading PEP 257 and 258 I got the impression that I could document module attributes and these would be available in the __doc__ attribute of the object. PEP 258 is rejected, so you can't take that as definitive. Ah! That explains it then. Thank you. (Also learned to start paying more attention to the status field). PEP 257 has this definition very early in the document: A docstring is a string literal that occurs as the first statement in a module, function, class, or method definition. Nothing there about documenting arbitrary attributes. That did get me a little confused. But since PEP 258 required PEP 257, I just assumed the former would redefine the latter and didn't make much of the apparent contradiction. Even if there was support from the compiler to extract the docstring, where would it be stored? Consider: spam = None Spammy goodness. eggs = None Scrambled, not fried. There's only one None object, and even if it could take a docstring (and it can't), which docstring would it get? Presumably the second, which would make help(spam) confusing, but when we say eggs = 23 the docstring would disappear too. This is a byproduct of me still thinking in terms of C variables. When I first read that paragraph of yours, it didn't make sense to me -- What is he talking about? I'm documenting the spam and eggs identifiers, not the None object. But when I was trying to reply to you by mounting a case around writing directly to the __doc__ attribute of the spam and eggs identifiers, the python shell was quick to make me realized my foolishness, and I remembered about Python variables not being the same as C variables. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: module attributes and docstrings
On Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:33:41 -0400, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote: You have discovered one of advantages of a def statement over a name=lambda assignment statement. In Python, there is no good reason to use the latter form and PEP 8 specifically discourages it: Always use a def statement instead of an assignment statement that binds a lambda expression directly to an identifier. Chris also suggested me this. And frankly, I don't see why I shouldn't follow that advise. It's good advice. However, lambda functions do read well in my mind and I find it hard to spot where they obscure the code more than a function. So the explicit vs. implicit part of the argument doesn't translate well with me. I however agree that a function declaration brings other benefits, like the ability to decorate or document. I will reserve the use of lambdas to only where they are necessary. Thanks. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: module attributes and docstrings
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 8:53 PM, Mario Figueiredo mar...@gmail.com wrote: However, lambda functions do read well in my mind and I find it hard to spot where they obscure the code more than a function. So the explicit vs. implicit part of the argument doesn't translate well with me. I however agree that a function declaration brings other benefits, like the ability to decorate or document. A function is a function is a function, so really, it's just a question of whether you create them with a statement (def) or an expression (lambda). Two basic rules of thumb: 1) If you're assigning a lambda function to a simple name, then you don't need it to be an expression, so use def. 2) If you're warping your function body to make it an expression, use def. Basically, look at the outside and look at the inside. In some cases, it's obvious that it's all expressions: # Sort a list of widget objects by name widgets.sort(key=lambda w: w.name) Other times, it's pretty obvious that you should be using statements: delete_name_if_blank = lambda w: delattr(w, name) if w.name == else None list(map(delete_name_if_blank, widgets)) In between, there's a lot of room to call it either way. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[issue23782] Leak in _PyTraceback_Add
STINNER Victor added the comment: If a new exception is raised by _PyTraceback_Add(), the original exception is lost. It's sad because _PyTraceback_Add() is supposed to enhance the current exception, not to drop it. In the draft of my PEP 490, I propose to chain the two exceptions. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23782 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18828] urljoin behaves differently with custom and standard schemas
Martin Panter added the comment: The current behaviour when no scheme is present is fairly sensible to me and should not be changed to do string concatenation nor raise an exception: urljoin(//netloc/old/path, new/path) '//netloc/old/new/path' I am posting urljoin-non-hier.patch as an alternative to my first patch. This one changes urljoin() to work on any URL scheme not in the existing “non_hierarchical” blacklist. I removed the gopher, wais, and imap schemes from the list, and added tel, so that urljoin() continues to treat these special cases as before. Out of the schemes mentioned in the module but missing from uses_relative, I think non_hierarchical now has all those without directory components: hdl, mailto, news, sip, sips, snews, tel, telnet. However I am still not really convinced that my first urljoin-scheme.patch is a bad idea. Do people actually use urljoin() with these schemes like mailto in the first place? -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file38698/urljoin-non-hier.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18828 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: Regex Python Help
On Wed, 25 Mar 2015 14:19:39 -0700, Gregg Dotoli wrote: On Wednesday, March 25, 2015 at 4:36:01 PM UTC-4, Denis McMahon wrote: On Tue, 24 Mar 2015 11:13:41 -0700, gdotoli wrote: I am creating a tool to search a filesystem for one simple string. man grep STOP! REINVENTING! THE! WHEEL! Your new wheel will invariably be slower and less efficient than the old one. Grep is regular expressions. If I'm using Python, I'll use the Python modules. Silly 1. Please don't top post, this is usenet, we don't top post, comments go after the text they comment on soi we can read down the page and it makes sense. 2. You gave the thread the title of regex python help. 3. Your initial comment was I am creating a tool to search a filesystem for one simple string. 4. The tool (see 3) already exists, it's called grep, it uses regular expressions (see 2). It's also going to be a lot faster than using python. 5. According to your post, grep seems to be the tool you are looking for. 6. Reinventing grep in python seems much more silly to me, by the time you've finished writing and testing the python code (especially if you need to seek help from a newsgroup in the process) grep would have found and identified every file containing your one simple string. -- Denis McMahon, denismfmcma...@gmail.com -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Supply condition in function call
Cameron Simpson wrote: On 26Mar2015 10:03, Peter Otten __pete...@web.de wrote: Cameron Simpson wrote: vars = locals() varnames = list(vars.keys()) That leaves varnames in undefined order. Consider varnames = sorted(vars) Actually, not necessary. I started with sorted, but it is irrelevant, so I backed off to list to avoid introducing an unwarranted implication, in fact precisely the implicaion you are making. The only requirement, which I mentioned, is that the values used to initialise the namedtuple are supplied in the same order as the tuple field names, so all that is needed is to suck the .keys() out once and use them in the same order when we construct the namedtuple. Hence just a list. You are right. Once I spotted the error I failed to notice that you pass the named tuple as a single argument, i. e. condition(nt), not condition(*nt) :( By the way, in this case you don't need the list at all: def vartuple(vars): return namedtuple(locals, vars)._make(vars.values()) -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[issue23784] Reloading tokenize module leads to error
New submission from David Marks: On 432 in tokenize.py there is an assignment _builtin_open = open Followed in 434 with a redefinition of open def open(filename): If the module is reloaded, _builtin_open gets reassigned to the new function and subsequent calls to _builtin_open fail. -- components: Library (Lib) messages: 239322 nosy: dmarks priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Reloading tokenize module leads to error type: behavior versions: Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23784 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: Sudoku solver
Abhiram R abhi.darkn...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 8:56 PM, Abhiram R abhi.darkn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 26, 2015 5:39 AM, Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
$ cat sudoku2.dat
. . . 7 . . . . .
1 . . . . . . . .
. . . 4 3 . 2 . .
. . . . . . . . 6
. . . 5 . 9 . . .
. . . . . . 4 1 8
. . . . 8 1 . . .
. . 2 . . . . 5 .
. 4 . . . . 3 . .
I tried the first puzzle you posted, and it took about a second. I
then started running it on this one before I started typing up this
post, and it hasn't finished yet.
So... Is it done yet? And if yes, how long did it take?
I don't know, I killed it at about 16 minutes.
:( Too bad. I'll give it a go myself. And then try implementing my own
solution. Have a lot of time on my hands today :D
Early optimization and so on and so forth...
I have optimized my solution slightly:
1. precalculated integer division operations (big savings)
2. interned integers (little savings)
The example above now finishes in 41 minutes on my computer. (The C
version finishes in 13 seconds).
The program runs single-threaded. Taking the trouble to parallelize the
algorithm is out of scope for the purposes of this discussion; it would
necessarily destroy the compactness of the solution.
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import sys
M = 3
N = M * M
P = M * N
Q = M * P
buddies = [ [ buddy
for buddy in range(Q)
if buddy != slot and
(buddy % N == slot % N or
buddy // N == slot // N or
buddy // P == slot // P and
buddy % N // M == slot % N // M) ]
for slot in range(Q) ]
interned = { n : n for n in range(1, N + 1) }
candidates = list(interned.values())
def main():
board = []
for n in sys.stdin.read().split():
try:
board.append(int(n))
except ValueError:
board.append(None)
solve(board)
def solve(board, slot=0):
if slot == Q:
report(board)
elif board[slot] is None:
for candidate in candidates:
if not any(board[buddy] is candidate for buddy in buddies[slot]):
board[slot] = candidate
solve(board, slot + 1)
board[slot] = None
else:
solve(board, slot + 1)
def report(board):
print(\n.join(
.join(str(board[row * N + col])
for col in range(N))
for row in range(N)))
print()
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()
Marko
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[issue23783] Leak in PyObject_ClearWeakRefs
New submission from Serhiy Storchaka: If restore_error == 1 in PyObject_ClearWeakRefs() (Objects/weakrefobject.c:883) and PyTuple_New() fails in Objects/weakrefobject.c:923, PyErr_Fetch is called twice and both exceptions leak. -- components: Extension Modules messages: 239320 nosy: fdrake, haypo, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Leak in PyObject_ClearWeakRefs type: resource usage ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23783 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
RE: Function Defaults - avoiding unneccerary combinations of arguments at input
On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 08:47 pm, Ivan Evstegneev wrote: -Original Message- From: Python-list [mailto:python-list- bounces+webmailgroups=gmail@python.org] On Behalf Of Steven D'Aprano Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 01:49 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: Function Defaults - avoiding unneccerary combinations of arguments at input On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 04:43 am, Ivan Evstegneev wrote: Hello all , Just a little question about function's default arguments. Let's say I have this function: def my_fun(history=False, built=False, current=False, topo=None, full=False, file=None): if currnet and full: do something_1 elif current and file: do something_2 elif history and full and file: do something_3 [...] As I said in a previous mail, main purpose of this arguments is to define what path should be chose. It is actually one xls file that could be placed into various placed within my folder tree. For instance, I have following folder tree: data_lib/ current/ history/ built/ Say I have test.xls that could be in one of those three folders. I wrote a function that reads it out, and its input arguments just define where it should be read. So all those ifs related to path definition. Perhaps something like this? def my_func(subdir): if subdir not in (current, history, built): raise ValueError(invalid sub-directory) # Better to use os.path.join, but I'm feeling lazy. path = path/to/data_lib/ + subdir + /test.xls process(path) -- Steven -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[issue23784] Reloading tokenize module leads to error
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Fixed in issue23615. -- nosy: +serhiy.storchaka resolution: - out of date stage: - resolved status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23784 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23663] Crash on failure in ctypes on Cygwin
Masayuki Yamamoto added the comment: similar issue #23338: PyErr_Format in ctypes uses invalid parameter -- nosy: +masamoto ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23663 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23783] Leak in PyObject_ClearWeakRefs
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Proposed patch should fix the issue. -- keywords: +patch stage: - patch review versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.4, Python 3.5 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file38700/issue23783.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23783 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
Fwd: test1
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:01 AM, alister alister.nospam.w...@ntlworld.com wrote: On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 00:36:49 +, Mark Lawrence wrote: On 26/03/2015 00:17, MRAB wrote: On 2015-03-25 22:36, Chris Angelico wrote: On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 6:49 AM, Tiglath Suriol tiglathsur...@gmail.com wrote: Two possibilities: You are a moderator. If you are a moderator you are welcome to delete my tests posts. This is of course improbably because this newsgroup is not moderated. You misunderstand newsgroups and mailing lists. Posts do not get deleted after the event. Even on a web forum, where an administrator can delete posts, the information is already out there; the instant any one person has seen your post, you've lost control of it. So think about what you post - especially when (as in your other thread) it contains private information. The other possibility is that you are just a guy, who despite the fact that my posts cost you nothing, and you are absolutely free to ignore them, your life is so dull that that you just must intervene and comment on anything you do not comprehend, because appointing yourself net cop is about as exciting as it gets. It's a free country, I know. You have every right to engage in pathetic speech. You also misunderstand freedom. I suggest you explore all three concepts (freedom, newsgroups, and mailing lists), and learn what you're actually dealing with. You may find the results rewarding. ChrisA A quick search suggests that he has prior form. How many years did he get? Was it PHP or C++ ? :) i hope he has a good spam filter as I am about to sign him up for everything :-) Well he did gave out his private key to the public in an ASCII format. I wonder what people can do with it? ;-) -- Violence in reality is quite different from theory. -- Spock, The Cloud Minders, stardate 5818.4 -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[issue23784] Reloading tokenize module leads to error
Changes by STINNER Victor victor.stin...@gmail.com: -- resolution: out of date - fixed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23784 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
sys.exec_prefix doesn't seem to reflect --exec-prefix path
Hi, on my linux box there is a python version 2.7.5 installed in /usr/local. Now I want to install the newer version 2.7.9, but in a different directory to avoid clashes with the current installation. What I did was: ./configure --prefix /usr/local/Python-2.7.9 --exec-prefix /usr/local/Python-2.7.9 make make install Everything looks fine, Python is installed in the proper directory. BUT: When I run /usr/local/Python-2.7.9/bin/python and do 'print sys.exec_prefix' it prints '/usr/local' instead of '/usr/local/Python-2.7.9'. This has the effect that the old libraries of version 2.7.5 are used instead of the 2.7.9 ones. The docs in https://docs.python.org/2/library/sys.html state that sys.exec_prefix will reflect the value given to option --exec-prefix at configuration time. Any idea what I did wrong? Thanks for your help, Ralph -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[issue23785] Leak in TextIOWrapper.tell()
New submission from Serhiy Storchaka: If an exception was raised in TextIOWrapper.tell() and then restoring state is failed, original exception is lost and leaked. -- components: Extension Modules messages: 239327 nosy: benjamin.peterson, haypo, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, stutzbach priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Leak in TextIOWrapper.tell() type: resource usage versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.4, Python 3.5 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23785 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: test1
On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 00:36:49 +, Mark Lawrence wrote: On 26/03/2015 00:17, MRAB wrote: On 2015-03-25 22:36, Chris Angelico wrote: On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 6:49 AM, Tiglath Suriol tiglathsur...@gmail.com wrote: Two possibilities: You are a moderator. If you are a moderator you are welcome to delete my tests posts. This is of course improbably because this newsgroup is not moderated. You misunderstand newsgroups and mailing lists. Posts do not get deleted after the event. Even on a web forum, where an administrator can delete posts, the information is already out there; the instant any one person has seen your post, you've lost control of it. So think about what you post - especially when (as in your other thread) it contains private information. The other possibility is that you are just a guy, who despite the fact that my posts cost you nothing, and you are absolutely free to ignore them, your life is so dull that that you just must intervene and comment on anything you do not comprehend, because appointing yourself net cop is about as exciting as it gets. It's a free country, I know. You have every right to engage in pathetic speech. You also misunderstand freedom. I suggest you explore all three concepts (freedom, newsgroups, and mailing lists), and learn what you're actually dealing with. You may find the results rewarding. ChrisA A quick search suggests that he has prior form. How many years did he get? Was it PHP or C++ ? :) i hope he has a good spam filter as I am about to sign him up for everything :-) -- Violence in reality is quite different from theory. -- Spock, The Cloud Minders, stardate 5818.4 -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[issue23663] Crash on failure in ctypes on Cygwin
David Macek added the comment: Yeah, looks like exactly the same issue. Sorry for the duplicate. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23663 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: Basic Python V3 Search Tool using RE module
Gregg Dotoli Are you reminding everyone who had a PC running DOS2.X-3X in 1990. It was really a pain at that time that a hard disk of an intel-MS based PC was sold hundreds of dollars, and another pain was that the buyer had to use the disabled dir in DOS after buying a HD. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[issue23785] Leak in TextIOWrapper.tell()
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com: -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file38699/issue23785.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23785 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23785] Leak in TextIOWrapper.tell()
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Proposed patch chain original exception to the exception raised by setstate(saved_state). This matches the behavior of Python implementation. -- stage: - patch review ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23785 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: Sudoku solver
Frank Millman fr...@chagford.com: Here is another python-based sudoku solver - http://www.ics.uci.edu/~eppstein/PADS/Sudoku.py From its docstring - A proper Sudoku puzzle must have a unique solution, and it should be possible to reach that solution by a sequence of logical deductions without trial and error. I don't think that statement holds water. Trial-and-error is at the basis of deduction (reductio ad absurdum). The human solver employs it in their head. The question is, what is the difference between pen-and-paper and in-your-head for a computer program? (Question: Are computers good at blindfold chess?) To the extent possible, we strive to keep the same ethic in our automated solver, by mimicking human rule-based reasoning, rather than resorting to brute force backtracking search. That's cool... A neat feature is that, having printed the solution, it then lists every step it took in its reasoning process to arrive at the solution. It solved Marko's original puzzle and Ian's puzzle in less than a second. It could not solve Marko's second one, returning impossible immediately. ... but that realization greatly reduces the value of the solver. I brought up sudoku solving as a real-world example of the usefulness of exhaustive recursion. The concerns on astronomical execution times must be considered but at the same time, one should realize things aren't as bad as they would seem: exhaustion is a practical way to solve sudoku puzzles and analogous programming challenges. The compactness of a working sudoku solver should demonstrate something about (1) the usefulness of recursion and (2) the expressive power of Python. Marko -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Sudoku solver
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:26 PM, Marko Rauhamaa ma...@pacujo.net wrote: Frank Millman fr...@chagford.com: Here is another python-based sudoku solver - http://www.ics.uci.edu/~eppstein/PADS/Sudoku.py From its docstring - A proper Sudoku puzzle must have a unique solution, and it should be possible to reach that solution by a sequence of logical deductions without trial and error. I don't think that statement holds water. Trial-and-error is at the basis of deduction (reductio ad absurdum). The human solver employs it in their head. The question is, what is the difference between pen-and-paper and in-your-head for a computer program? Nothing. And solving a Sudoku puzzle - or any other puzzle - should require no guessing. It should be possible to solve purely by logic. Same goes for every other kind of puzzle out there; it's highly unsatisfying to play Minesweeper and get to the end with a block of four squares in a corner, two mines left, and no way of knowing which diagonal has the mines and which is clear. No trial-and-error, thanks. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Sudoku solver
On Mar 26, 2015 6:31 AM, Marko Rauhamaa ma...@pacujo.net wrote: Frank Millman fr...@chagford.com: Here is another python-based sudoku solver - http://www.ics.uci.edu/~eppstein/PADS/Sudoku.py From its docstring - A proper Sudoku puzzle must have a unique solution, and it should be possible to reach that solution by a sequence of logical deductions without trial and error. I don't think that statement holds water. Trial-and-error is at the basis of deduction (reductio ad absurdum). The human solver employs it in their head. The question is, what is the difference between pen-and-paper and in-your-head for a computer program? It's an accurate characterization of the sort of puzzles that are typically presented as sudoku. I don't think that I have used trial and error, in my head or otherwise, in any sudoku I have ever solved. It solved Marko's original puzzle and Ian's puzzle in less than a second. It could not solve Marko's second one, returning impossible immediately. Perhaps this is why that puzzle was described as being so difficult: it required steps that human solvers don't usually take. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Fwd: test1
On Thursday, March 26, 2015 at 6:41:15 PM UTC-4, Steven D'Aprano wrote: On Fri, 27 Mar 2015 07:00 am, BartC wrote: [...] Don't give the troll the attention he craves. He reacted with hostility and scorn when we gave him some friendly good advice, don't imagine for a second you're going to reason with him. He's admitted that he's been trolling for years, so don't bother to engage with him. The problem with wrestling a pig in the mud is that you get dirty and the pig enjoys it. -- Steven Steven exhorts you not to give me any attention, yet he posts three times to my thread. Go figure. With enemies like this who needs friends... -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[issue23605] Use the new os.scandir() function in os.walk()
Ben Hoyt added the comment: Victor, great work on pushing this out, especially with the modifying the directories fix. (And thanks Serhiy for pushing on correctness here.) Couple of comments/questions about your new os.walk() implementation. 1) The new implementation is more complex. Of course, most of this is necessary due to the topdown directory issue. However, one thing I'm not sure about is why you create scandir_it manually and use a while True loop, adding complexity and making it require two versions of the error handling. Why not a simple for entry in scandir(top): ... with a try/except OSError around the whole loop? I could well be missing something here though. 2) In this commit http://bugs.python.org/review/23605/diff/14181/Lib/os.py -- which is not the final one, I don't quite understand the catch_oserror thing. Presumably this turned out to be unnecessary, as it's not in the final version? 3) Really minor thing: in one of the comments, you misspell symbolik. Should be symbolic. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23605 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: test1
On Thursday, March 26, 2015 at 9:55:08 PM UTC-4, Denis McMahon wrote: On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 14:06:28 -0700, marcuslom101 wrote: I posted two test messages containing code. They are still there, are you blind as well as dumb? The message that you posted at the start of this thread may have contained code, but it wasn't python code, Every post you made in this thread is off-topic. Pot-kettle? Seriously folks, is this the best you can do? -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: test1
On Thursday, March 26, 2015 at 6:36:57 PM UTC-4, Steven D'Aprano wrote: On Fri, 27 Mar 2015 02:33 am, Joel Goldstick wrote: [...] Don't give the troll the attention he craves. He has as much told us that he is beyond reason -- he's been trolling for years, you don't need to justify your actions. I don't lie to you folks. I told you from the outset that I did come here to provoke anyone, and I have asked you to ignore me repeatedly, something trolls are not known to do, but since YOU STARTED it, and you want more, I am having fun with you, and I can keep it up until the hell freezes, I assure you. Because one usually has to pay for a ticket to laugh like this. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Supply condition in function call
On Friday, March 27, 2015 at 7:26:54 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote: On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Rustom Mody wrote: On a more specific note, its the 1st line: class filter(object) which knocks me off. If a more restricted type from the ABC was shown which exactly captures all the iterator-specific stuff like __iter__, __next__ it would sure help (me) But there's no point in subclassing for everything. In this case, filter doesn't subclass anything but object, so there's no value in stating anything else. You want to know if it's iterable? Check for an __iter__ method. Etcetera. Well maybe... I dont the ABC thing very well in python. [It does seem to be underutilized] Anyway my point is that in python (after 2.2??) saying something is an object is a bit of a tautology -- ie verbiage without information. Note: We are not talking of the *fact* that something -- in this case filter -- subclasses object, but the output of help(filter) -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: test1
On Thursday, March 26, 2015 at 10:24:33 PM UTC-4, Mario Figueiredo wrote: On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 18:56:25 -0700 (PDT), How disappointing, I was expecting something worth opposing. And that's bad? Successfully opposing a troll is like getting a medal for winning an argument with Spencer Pratt. Delusional pricks like you are only worth the 2 or 3 messages I care about writing for my own satisfaction. After that you just get as boring as the afore-mentioned idiot. Bye-bye! All brawn no brain Mario lays down his confused rationale for leaving the field of battle after a couple of embarrassingly vulgar posts. Giving Mario an Internet connection just invites his reach to exceed his grasp. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Supply condition in function call
On Friday, March 27, 2015 at 7:56:16 AM UTC+5:30, Ian wrote: On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 7:56 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: On a more specific note, its the 1st line: class filter(object) which knocks me off. If a more restricted type from the ABC was shown which exactly captures all the iterator-specific stuff like __iter__, __next__ it would sure help (me) But there's no point in subclassing for everything. In this case, filter doesn't subclass anything but object, so there's no value in stating anything else. You want to know if it's iterable? Check for an __iter__ method. Etcetera. Also, filter is a builtin, while collections.abc.Iterable is in a library module written in Python, so there's a bootstrapping problem with having the one inherit from the other. As I said to Chris, I am not talking of the facts but of the docs -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Supply condition in function call
On Fri, 27 Mar 2015 01:21 pm, Rustom Mody wrote: Anyway my point is that in python (after 2.2??) saying something is an object is a bit of a tautology -- ie verbiage without information. Er, it's *always* been a tautology. Every value in Python is an object, including classes, and that has been always the case. However, just because it's a tautology doesn't mean it isn't useful to know. (Tautologies are also known as *facts* and knowing facts is usually a good thing.) For the majority of programming languages, it is not the case that all values are objects, and not all people reading the documentation should be expected to know that this applies to Python. Besides, object in Python circles is ambiguous. It can also mean: * the Python type object; * an instance of the Python type object; * any non-class instance of any old-style class (Python 2 only) or type (new-style class); * boxed values in object-oriented languages; and possibly others as well. Personally, I dislike using object as a synonym for instance, as it fails to account for classes which are instances. But other than that, all those meanings are valid and have to be distinguished from context. -- Steven -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[issue4944] os.fsync() doesn't work as expect in Windows
eryksun added the comment: Emil, Your example child process opens the file with only read sharing, which fails with a sharing violation if some other process inherits the file handle with write access. The `with` block only prevents this in a single-threaded environment. When you spawn 10 children, each from a separate thread, there's a good chance that one child will inherit a handle that triggers a sharing violation in another child. Using close_fds is a blunt solution since it prevents inheriting all inheritable handles. What you really need here has actually already been done for you. Just use the file descriptor that mkstemp returns, i.e. use os.fdopen(infd, 'wb'). mkstemp opens the file with O_NOINHERIT set in the flags. -- nosy: +eryksun ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue4944 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: test1
On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 18:56:25 -0700 (PDT), Tiglath Suriol tiglathsur...@gmail.com wrote: How disappointing, I was expecting something worth opposing. And that's bad? Successfully opposing a troll is like getting a medal for winning an argument with Spencer Pratt. Delusional pricks like you are only worth the 2 or 3 messages I care about writing for my own satisfaction. After that you just get as boring as the afore-mentioned idiot. Bye-bye! -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Test3
/*
* Only assholes need reply to this thread.
*/
var Obj = (function() {
return function() {
var docRoot = '/as-qa23';
this.validateDocRoot = function(val) {
// throw Exception if not OK
};
this.setDocRoot = function(val) {
this.validateDocRoot(val);
docRoot = val;
};
this.getDocRoot = function() {
return docRoot;
};
Object.preventExtensions(this)
};
}());
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why?
Steven D'Aprano steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info: You're arguing whether or not in the following line of code: spam = abcd efgh # implicitly concatenated to abcdefgh at compile time the right hand side pair of strings counts as a single token or two? Am I right, or am I missing something? If that's all it is, why don't you just run the tokenizer over it and see what it says? Now, someone *could* write a tokenizer that took care of string concatenation on the spot--as long as it dealt with comments as well: (abc # hello def) It would be even possible to write a parser that didn't have a separate lexical analyzer at all. Arguing about terminology is pretty useless. Both sides in this fight are correct, namely: * string literal concatenation is part of expression syntax * what goes on inside an atom stays inside an atom For example, this expression is illegal: abc (def) Marko -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Supply condition in function call
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 7:56 PM, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote: On a more specific note, its the 1st line: class filter(object) which knocks me off. If a more restricted type from the ABC was shown which exactly captures all the iterator-specific stuff like __iter__, __next__ it would sure help (me) But there's no point in subclassing for everything. In this case, filter doesn't subclass anything but object, so there's no value in stating anything else. You want to know if it's iterable? Check for an __iter__ method. Etcetera. Also, filter is a builtin, while collections.abc.Iterable is in a library module written in Python, so there's a bootstrapping problem with having the one inherit from the other. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Sudoku solver
Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com: On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Marko Rauhamaa ma...@pacujo.net wrote: In fact, the trial-and-error technique is used in automated theorem proving: Lean provers are generally implemented in Prolog, and make proficient use of the backtracking engine and logic variables of that language. URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lean_theorem_prover Sure, but what has this to do with the statement that *sudoku* should not require trial and error to solve? Trial-and-error was presented in opposition to logical deduction, while really trial-and-error *is* logical deduction. Marko -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: test1
On Thursday, March 26, 2015 at 11:34:11 AM UTC-4, Joel Goldstick wrote: On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Tiglath Suriol wrote: On Thursday, March 26, 2015 at 9:53:48 AM UTC-4, Joel Goldstick wrote: Your first message was not python related. Your subsequent messages were rude. You've never been here before it seems. This is an interesting group, open to all with interest in python. How do you fit in? Not On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Tiglath Suriol wrote: On Wednesday, March 25, 2015 at 7:59:34 PM UTC-4, Steven D'Aprano wrote: On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 10:43 am, Tiglath Suriol wrote: I've dealt with people like you in newsgroups for a long time So many years, so little learning. It's arseholes like you who make it so important to invent a way to stab people through the internet. Just go away, you're not wanted here. I may stay a while just to poke you in the eye a little longer. I am beginning to enjoy this. People entering a battle of wits unarmed. It's a joy to watch. You talk as if I wanted you to want me. Pure delusion. I posted at nobody, as I am free to do, and idiots come out of the woodwork as if I had committed some infraction. And you even want to stab me. Sterling. Who raised you. wolves? -- Steven -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list -- Joel Goldstick http://joelgoldstick.com Rather... I came here because I can and may. but I did no provoke anyone. Then the Central Scrutinizer chimed in followed by his Seven Dwarves and his bitches. Now you, in which group do you fit? Had you all minded your business I wouldn't be here. Saving yourselves all those inane plonks, and even more inane retorts. Now be sincere, you write at me because this is like gawking at an accident on the road, it's a disturbance in your otherwise Pythonic, catatonic day. I did not intend to, but since you appeared, I don't mind kicking your asses for laughs. So please write more. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list You came here to be on display since you have some sort of warped sense of self. Show your mother what you write online. Maybe she can get you help Look at the facts, Harpo. I posted two test messages containing code. I did not address anyone, I did not ask anything, I made no comment. Said nothing about me or anyone. Posts are still there. See them. All large groups have the type of lame people who like those on the road cause a jam to look at some disturbance. Same here, it was just code, idiots. But you could not let it go. Had to poke your long noses in it. Now that you've found little pleasure in your endevour, you are plonking and whining like stuck pigs. Serves you right. You are free to ignore any post you object to. You also have the power to killfile anyone, so if you are still here stinking my thread is because either you are as thick as a brick, or you want a pissing contest. Which one is it? Bring it on or buzz off, but for fuck's sake stop whining. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Basic Python V3 Search Tool using RE module
On 03/26/2015 01:11 PM, Gregg Dotoli wrote: On Wednesday, March 25, 2015 at 3:43:38 PM UTC-4, Gregg Dotoli wrote: This basic script will help to find evidence of CryptoWall on a slave drive. Although it is just a string, more complex regex patterns can be replaced with the string. It is incredible how fast Python is and how easy it has helped in quickly assessing a pool of slave drives. I'm improving it as we speak. Thanks for your help and patience. I'm new with Python. import os import re # From the Root topdir = . # Regex Pattern pattern=DECRYPT_I regexp=re.compile(pattern) for dirpath,dirnames, files in os.walk(topdir): for name in files: result=regexp.search(name) print(os.path.join(dirpath,name)) print (result) Gregg Dotoli I posted this because I thought it may be of help to others. This does grep through all the files and is very fast because the regex is compiled in Python , rather than sitting in some directory as an external command. That is where the optimization comes in. Let's close this thread. It greps through all the filenames, but there's no open() call or equivalent there at all. it does not look inside a single file. We can stop posting to the thread, but that won't fix the bug in the code. -- DaveA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why?
Dave Angel wrote:
[Fixed quotation]
On 03/26/2015 01:09 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
https://docs.python.org/3/reference/lexical_analysis.html#string-
literal-concatenation
What the grammar that you quoted from shows is that STRING+ is an
expression. The individual STRINGs of a STRING+ are not expressions,
except to the extent that they can be parsed in isolation as a
STRING+. By the same token, a STRING+ is a single string literal, not
an aggregate of several.
That's the way I also read the BNF.
Then I am afraid you need to refresh your knowledge of formal grammars.
But something I cannot find in that chapter of the reference is the
definition of STRING+
You *definitely* need to refresh your knowledge of formal grammars.
“STRING+” in this flavor of _E_BNF is – rather obviously – equivalent to
multiple-string ::= STRING STRING*
STRING ::= '' no-unescaped-doublequote* ''
| ' no-unescaped-singlequote* '
| '' no-triple-doublequote* ''
| ''' no-triple-singlequote* '''
in BNF and
multiple-string = STRING *STRING
STRING = '' *no-unescaped-doublequote ''
/ ' *no-unescaped-singlequote ''
/ '' *no-unescaped-triple-doublequote ''
/ ''' *no-unescaped-triple-singlequote '''
in ABNF. I suspect that in this flavor of EBNF the definition of STRING
looks similar to the following:
STRING: ('' no_unescaped_doublequote* ''
| ' no_unescaped_singlequote* '
| '' no_unescaped_triple_doublequote* ''
| ''' no_unescaped_triple_singlequote* ''')
Definition of the still undefined goal symbols is left as an exercise to the
reader.
--
PointedEars
Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[issue21085] compile error Python3.3 on Cygwin
STINNER Victor added the comment: Could you please use a define like SIGINFO_HAS_SI_BAND? Something like: #if defined(HAVE_SIGINFO) !defined(__CYGWIN__) /* Issue #21085: In Cygwin, siginfo_t does not have si_band field. */ # define SIGINFO_HAS_SI_BAND #endif And please generate patches not the git format. Otherwise, Rietveld is unable to generated the review link. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21085 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23771] Timeouts on x86 Ubuntu Shared 3.x buildbot
STINNER Victor added the comment: A new failure test_subprocess.test_double_close_on_error: http://buildbot.python.org/all/builders/x86%20Ubuntu%20Shared%203.x/builds/11411/steps/test/logs/stdio --- Timeout (1:00:00)! Thread 0x55aafdc0 (most recent call first): File /srv/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.bolen-ubuntu/build/Lib/subprocess.py, line 1407 in _execute_child File /srv/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.bolen-ubuntu/build/Lib/subprocess.py, line 855 in __init__ File /srv/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.bolen-ubuntu/build/Lib/test/test_subprocess.py, line 1074 in test_double_close_on_error File /srv/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.bolen-ubuntu/build/Lib/unittest/case.py, line 577 in run File /srv/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.bolen-ubuntu/build/Lib/unittest/case.py, line 625 in __call__ File /srv/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.bolen-ubuntu/build/Lib/unittest/suite.py, line 122 in run File /srv/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.bolen-ubuntu/build/Lib/unittest/suite.py, line 84 in __call__ File /srv/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.bolen-ubuntu/build/Lib/unittest/suite.py, line 122 in run File /srv/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.bolen-ubuntu/build/Lib/unittest/suite.py, line 84 in __call__ File /srv/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.bolen-ubuntu/build/Lib/unittest/runner.py, line 176 in run File /srv/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.bolen-ubuntu/build/Lib/test/support/__init__.py, line 1773 in _run_suite File /srv/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.bolen-ubuntu/build/Lib/test/support/__init__.py, line 1807 in run_unittest File /srv/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.bolen-ubuntu/build/Lib/test/test_subprocess.py, line 2532 in test_main File /srv/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.bolen-ubuntu/build/Lib/test/regrtest.py, line 1284 in runtest_inner File /srv/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.bolen-ubuntu/build/Lib/test/regrtest.py, line 967 in runtest File /srv/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.bolen-ubuntu/build/Lib/test/regrtest.py, line 763 in main File /srv/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.bolen-ubuntu/build/Lib/test/regrtest.py, line 1568 in main_in_temp_cwd File /srv/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.bolen-ubuntu/build/Lib/test/__main__.py, line 3 in module File /srv/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.bolen-ubuntu/build/Lib/runpy.py, line 85 in _run_code File /srv/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.bolen-ubuntu/build/Lib/runpy.py, line 170 in _run_module_as_main make: *** [buildbottest] Error 1 --- -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23771 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why?
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: multiple-string = STRING *STRING […] in ABNF. JFTR: ABNF allows for multiple-string = 1*STRING to be equivalent to the above. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augmented_Backus%E2%80%93Naur_Form pp. -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[issue23786] test_unaligned_buffers (test.test_hash.HashEqualityTestCase) ... Fatal Python error: Bus error
Peter added the comment:
I went and recompiled with:
$ ./configure --prefix=/usr/local --enable-shared
--with-hash-algorithm=siphash24
But this crashed as well.
test_unaligned_buffers (test.test_hash.HashEqualityTestCase) ... Fatal Python
error: Bus error
Current thread 0x0001 (most recent call first):
File /usr/local/src/Python-3.4.3/Lib/test/test_hash.py, line 89 in
test_unaligned_buffers
File /usr/local/src/Python-3.4.3/Lib/unittest/case.py, line 577 in run
File /usr/local/src/Python-3.4.3/Lib/unittest/case.py, line 625 in __call__
File /usr/local/src/Python-3.4.3/Lib/unittest/suite.py, line 122 in run
File /usr/local/src/Python-3.4.3/Lib/unittest/suite.py, line 84 in __call__
File /usr/local/src/Python-3.4.3/Lib/unittest/suite.py, line 122 in run
File /usr/local/src/Python-3.4.3/Lib/unittest/suite.py, line 84 in __call__
File /usr/local/src/Python-3.4.3/Lib/unittest/suite.py, line 122 in run
File /usr/local/src/Python-3.4.3/Lib/unittest/suite.py, line 84 in __call__
File /usr/local/src/Python-3.4.3/Lib/unittest/runner.py, line 168 in run
File /usr/local/src/Python-3.4.3/Lib/test/support/__init__.py, line 1769 in
_run_suite
File /usr/local/src/Python-3.4.3/Lib/test/support/__init__.py, line 1803 in
run_unittest
File /usr/local/src/Python-3.4.3/Lib/test/regrtest.py, line 1279 in
test_runner
File /usr/local/src/Python-3.4.3/Lib/test/regrtest.py, line 1280 in
runtest_inner
File /usr/local/src/Python-3.4.3/Lib/test/regrtest.py, line 978 in runtest
File /usr/local/src/Python-3.4.3/Lib/test/regrtest.py, line 763 in main
File /usr/local/src/Python-3.4.3/Lib/test/regrtest.py, line 1564 in
main_in_temp_cwd
File /usr/local/src/Python-3.4.3/Lib/test/__main__.py, line 3 in module
File /usr/local/src/Python-3.4.3/Lib/runpy.py, line 85 in _run_code
File /usr/local/src/Python-3.4.3/Lib/runpy.py, line 170 in
_run_module_as_main
Bus Error (core dumped)
test_unaligned_buffers (test.test_hash.HashEqualityTestCase) ...
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 1 (LWP 1)]
0xff25d3d8 in siphash24 (src=0x1d2809, src_sz=optimized out) at
Python/pyhash.c:387
387 PY_UINT64_T mi = _le64toh(*in);
(gdb) bt
#0 0xff25d3d8 in siphash24 (src=0x1d2809, src_sz=optimized out) at
Python/pyhash.c:387
#1 0xff25dfa0 in _Py_HashBytes (src=0x1d2809, len=127) at Python/pyhash.c:186
#2 0xff1a7ce4 in memory_hash (self=0xfdfc5dc0) at Objects/memoryobject.c:2793
#3 0xff1afa40 in PyObject_Hash (v=0xfdfc5dc0) at Objects/object.c:757
#4 0xff22b6fc in builtin_hash (self=0xfee23600, v=0xfdfc5dc0) at
Python/bltinmodule.c:1269
#5 0xff236a70 in call_function (oparg=optimized out, pp_stack=0xffbfcd64) at
Python/ceval.c:4224
#6 PyEval_EvalFrameEx (f=optimized out, throwflag=optimized out) at
Python/ceval.c:2838
#7 0xff237790 in fast_function (nk=optimized out, na=optimized out, n=1,
pp_stack=0xffbfce5c,
func=optimized out) at Python/ceval.c:4334
(gdb) list
382 PY_UINT64_T t;
383 PY_UINT8_T *pt;
384 PY_UINT8_T *m;
385
386 while (src_sz = 8) {
387 PY_UINT64_T mi = _le64toh(*in);
388 in += 1;
389 src_sz -= 8;
390 v3 ^= mi;
391 DOUBLE_ROUND(v0,v1,v2,v3);
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23786
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: Basic Python V3 Search Tool using RE module
On Wednesday, March 25, 2015 at 3:43:38 PM UTC-4, Gregg Dotoli wrote: This basic script will help to find evidence of CryptoWall on a slave drive. Although it is just a string, more complex regex patterns can be replaced with the string. It is incredible how fast Python is and how easy it has helped in quickly assessing a pool of slave drives. I'm improving it as we speak. Thanks for your help and patience. I'm new with Python. import os import re # From the Root topdir = . # Regex Pattern pattern=DECRYPT_I regexp=re.compile(pattern) for dirpath,dirnames, files in os.walk(topdir): for name in files: result=regexp.search(name) print(os.path.join(dirpath,name)) print (result) Gregg Dotoli I posted this because I thought it may be of help to others. This does grep through all the files and is very fast because the regex is compiled in Python , rather than sitting in some directory as an external command. That is where the optimization comes in. Let's close this thread. Gregg -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Sudoku solver
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Marko Rauhamaa ma...@pacujo.net wrote: Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com: On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 8:23 AM, Marko Rauhamaa ma...@pacujo.net wrote: That's trial and error, aka, reductio ad absurdum. Okay, I've probably used single-lookahead trial and error in my reasoning at some point. But the example you give is equivalent to the deductive process That can't be a 5, so I remove it as a candidate. The only place left for a 5 is here, so I remove the 2 as a candidate and fill in the 5. In fact, the trial-and-error technique is used in automated theorem proving: Lean provers are generally implemented in Prolog, and make proficient use of the backtracking engine and logic variables of that language. URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lean_theorem_prover Sure, but what has this to do with the statement that *sudoku* should not require trial and error to solve? -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[issue21085] compile error Python3.3 on Cygwin
STINNER Victor added the comment: In that case, May I edit configure script to generate the HAVE_* defines? I'd like to add a statement to check the si_band to configure.ac. Does Cygwin use configure? If yes, go for configure. You can copy/paste my recent change for dirent.d_type field. I see. I use the mercurial repository from next time. Are you using git or hg? If you use hg, just change the config to not use git format. If you use git, don't worry, I can review without the review button. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21085 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: Fwd: test1
On 26/03/2015 15:38, Tiglath Suriol wrote: I did not spam anyone. I posted to an open public newsgroup. Just some code, nothing offensive or even directed to anyone. Then people started to get cute, and now that returned fire is a bucket a drop they complaints like bitches on the rag. Not surprised, but not SPAM either. If anyone pull a newsgroup into his email that's his doing, not mine. There are 100,000 different public newsgroups for a reason: they are all about different subjects. Your post had nothing to do with Python that I could see. To post test messages, try alt.test. Otherwise the newsgroup would get swamped if everyone posted irrelevant random stuff. BTW why /did/ you choose this newsgroup? -- Bartc -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why?
Ian Kelly wrote: On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn No, in the used flavour of EBNF the unquoted “+” following a goal symbol clearly means the occurrence of *at least one* of the immediately preceding symbol, meaning either one *or more than one*. It means one or more *tokens*, not one or more literals. Although reading the documentation, it seems that it also conflates string literals with tokens, There is nothing to conflate here. String literals *are* tokens. so on that I'll have to concede the point. Too late, the rebuttal is already underway :-p -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: test1
On 3/25/2015 12:49 PM, Tiglath Suriol wrote: On Tuesday, March 24, 2015 at 11:04:48 PM UTC-4, Chris Angelico wrote: On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Tiglath Suriol wrote: PLONK -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why?
Ian Kelly wrote:
[…] Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn […] wrote:
Chris Angelico wrote:
[…] Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn […] wrote:
Implicit concatenation is part of the syntax, not part of the
expression evaluator.
Reads like nonsense to me.
What do you mean?
As I showed, string literals and consecutive tokens of string literals
(“STRING+”) so as to do implicit concatenation *are* expressions of the
Python grammar. Expressions are *part of* the syntax of a programming
language.
Perhaps you mean that the time when implicit concatenation is evaluated
(compile time) differs from the time when other expressions are evaluated
(runtime). But a) whether that is true depends on the implementation and
b) there can be no doubt that either expression needs to be evaluated.
So whatever you mean by “expression evaluator” has to be able to do those
things.
Which makes the statement above read like nonsense to me.
What the grammar that you quoted from shows is that STRING+ is an
expression. The individual STRINGs of a STRING+ are not expressions,
except to the extent that they can be parsed in isolation as a
STRING+.
How did you get that idea? STRING+ means one or more consecutive STRING
tokens (ignoring whitespace in-between), which means one or more consecutive
string literals. A (single) string literal definitely is an expression as
it can be produced with the “expr” goal symbol of the Python grammar (given
there in a flavor of EBNF).
By the same token, a STRING+ is a single string literal, not
an aggregate of several.
No, in the used flavour of EBNF the unquoted “+” following a goal symbol
clearly means the occurrence of *at least one* of the immediately preceding
symbol, meaning either one *or more than one*.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backus%E2%80%93Naur_Form pp.
Ancillary data point:
help(ast.literal_eval)
Safely evaluate an expression node or a string containing a Python
expression. The string or node provided may only consist of the
following Python literal structures: strings, bytes, numbers, tuples,
lists, dicts, sets, booleans, and None.
ast.literal_eval('foo bar')
'foobar'
So the ast.literal_eval also treats this as one literal expression.
What do you mean?
ast.literal_eval() sees a single string value resulting from the evaluation
of one string literal, by the Python compiler, that contains the
representation of two consecutive string literals:
'foo bar'
It then does exactly what the Python compiler would do in such a case: parse
this as if it were one string literal (the “implicit concatenation” I am
talking about).
foo bar ≡ foobar
This was not debated.
--
PointedEars
Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why?
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn No, in the used flavour of EBNF the unquoted “+” following a goal symbol clearly means the occurrence of *at least one* of the immediately preceding symbol, meaning either one *or more than one*. It means one or more *tokens*, not one or more literals. Although reading the documentation, it seems that it also conflates string literals with tokens, so on that I'll have to concede the point. https://docs.python.org/3.4/reference/lexical_analysis.html#string-and-bytes-literals -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why?
Ian Kelly wrote: […] Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn […] wrote: Ian Kelly wrote: What the grammar that you quoted from shows is that STRING+ is an expression. The individual STRINGs of a STRING+ are not expressions, except to the extent that they can be parsed in isolation as a STRING+. How did you get that idea? STRING+ means one or more consecutive STRING tokens (ignoring whitespace in-between), which means one or more consecutive string literals. A (single) string literal definitely is an expression as it can be produced with the “expr” goal symbol of the Python grammar (given there in a flavor of EBNF). Yes, that's what I was referring to in my parenthetical except... above. Your “except” is contradictory to the rest of what you said, at best. What I mean is that if you construct a parse tree of foo bar using that grammar, it looks like this: expr | STRING+ / \ STRING STRING […] There is only one expr node, and it contains both STRING tokens. Prove it. But be warned: Neither would prove that a string literal is not an expression. Because you did not consider the most simple variant of an AST (or subtree) according to this grammar: expr | STRING Again, “STRING+” does _not_ mean “STRING STRING STRING*”; it means “STRING STRING*”. The second and following STRINGs are *optional*. […] in the used flavour of EBNF the unquoted “+” following a goal symbol clearly means the occurrence of *at least one* of the immediately preceding symbol, meaning either one *or more than one*. It means one or more *tokens*, not one or more literals. Utter nonsense. Have you ever written a parser? (I have.) A literal *is* a token. Whether two consecutive tokens end up as the same *node* in an AST is a *different* issue (that, again, was _not_ debated). -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[issue21085] compile error Python3.3 on Cygwin
Masayuki Yamamoto added the comment: Victor, In that case, May I edit configure script to generate the HAVE_* defines? I'd like to add a statement to check the si_band to configure.ac. And please generate patches not the git format. Otherwise, Rietveld is unable to generated the review link. I see. I use the mercurial repository from next time. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21085 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23786] test_unaligned_buffers (test.test_hash.HashEqualityTestCase) ... Fatal Python error: Bus error
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Siphash24 implementation is not designed to work on platforms that require aligned access. But I'm surprised that fnv implementation crashes. I don't see anything wrong. May be gcc needs some special options to produce correct binaries on this platform? -- nosy: +serhiy.storchaka ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23786 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why?
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn pointede...@web.de wrote: Ian Kelly wrote: What the grammar that you quoted from shows is that STRING+ is an expression. The individual STRINGs of a STRING+ are not expressions, except to the extent that they can be parsed in isolation as a STRING+. How did you get that idea? STRING+ means one or more consecutive STRING tokens (ignoring whitespace in-between), which means one or more consecutive string literals. A (single) string literal definitely is an expression as it can be produced with the “expr” goal symbol of the Python grammar (given there in a flavor of EBNF). Yes, that's what I was referring to in my parenthetical except... above. What I mean is that if you construct a parse tree of foo bar using that grammar, it looks like this: expr | STRING+ / \ STRING STRING Not like this: expr | STRING+ / \ expr expr | | STRING STRING There is only one expr node, and it contains both STRING tokens. By the same token, a STRING+ is a single string literal, not an aggregate of several. No, in the used flavour of EBNF the unquoted “+” following a goal symbol clearly means the occurrence of *at least one* of the immediately preceding symbol, meaning either one *or more than one*. It means one or more *tokens*, not one or more literals. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Cannot Uninstall 3.4
T Younger tlyt...@gmail.com writes: I have 3.4.1 (8/14) and replaced it with 3.4.2 (12/14) Neither of these uninstalled or I do not believe even had the option. That's not so much a question about Python; it is rather a question of how you install and uninstall applications on your operating system. There's not enough information in your message to know what's wrong. What did you use to install each of these? Does whatever did the installation record un-install information? -- \ “To label any subject unsuitable for comedy is to admit | `\ defeat.” —Peter Sellers | _o__) | Ben Finney -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[issue23290] Faster set copying
STINNER Victor added the comment: Is msg234811 the result of set_faster_copy_3.patch? If yes, I see no reason to not apply the patch: the patch is short and looks always fast, and sometimes *much* faster. I just leaved a small comment on the review. -- nosy: +haypo ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23290 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: Cannot Uninstall 3.4
On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 18:52:41 -0500, T Younger tlyt...@gmail.com wrote: I have 3.4.1 (8/14) and replaced it with 3.4.2 (12/14) Neither of these uninstalled or I do not believe even had the option. I now wanted to update to 3.4.3 and the uninstall fails, provided the message that the installer is missing a program then backs off the changes. I loaded 3.5.0a2 and then uninstalled it OK. How do I get to 3.4.3 please? What's your system? There isn't usually any need to uninstall in order to upgrade minor releases. You just install over the previous one, since Python34 will still remain the main folder/directory. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Save session Selenium PhantomJS
Objective: Save the browser session/cookies to share them in multiples script execution. I currently have this working using ChromeDriver: chrome_options = Options() chrome_options.add_argument(user-data-dir= + os.path.dirname(sys.argv[0])) browser = webdriver.Chrome(chrome_options=chrome_options) This code tells Chrome to use a specific path, in my case the script path, as data folder where it stores everything, and NOT use the default approach where everything is temporary and deleted when the script exits. This way, I can login in the site I need once and exit the script. If I execute the script later everything is already saved and I don't have to login anymore. I need this approach because the site has a security measure where they send a key to my email everytime I login in a new PC. The issue: Now I need to use PhantomJS. I already tried this code: cookie_path = os.path.join(os.getcwd(), 'cookie.txt') driver = webdriver.WebDriver(service_args=['--cookies-file=cookies.txt']) But it doesn't work. I looked at the PhantomJS doc and on Google but didn't find anything. I hope someone knows better than me and could give me a hand here. Thanks. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[issue23611] Pickle nested names with protocols 4
STINNER Victor added the comment: It is used in multiprocessing and this is not configurable. Oh, it would be nice to switch to version 4 by default, or make it configurable. I read that the version 4 is faster. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23611 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23529] Limit decompressed data when reading from LZMAFile and BZ2File
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: Is it still work-in-progress or are you looking for a review? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23529 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23529] Limit decompressed data when reading from LZMAFile and BZ2File
Nikolaus Rath added the comment: I believe Martin's patch (v8) is ready for a core committer review. At least I can't find anything to criticize anymore :-). -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23529 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23786] test_unaligned_buffers (test.test_hash.HashEqualityTestCase) ... Fatal Python error: Bus error
New submission from Peter: I compiled Python 3.4.3 on Solaris 11, and when I ran the regression test, I get a core dump when the hash() function was being used. I went through the bug database looking for something similar but couldn't find anything. Tests like: test_unaligned_buffers (test.test_hash.HashEqualityTestCase) ... Fatal Python error: Bus error Current thread 0x0001 (most recent call first): File /usr/local/lib/python3.4/test/test_hash.py, line 89 in test_unaligned_buffers File /usr/local/lib/python3.4/unittest/case.py, line 577 in run File /usr/local/lib/python3.4/unittest/case.py, line 625 in __call__ File /usr/local/lib/python3.4/unittest/suite.py, line 122 in run File /usr/local/lib/python3.4/unittest/suite.py, line 84 in __call__ File /usr/local/lib/python3.4/unittest/suite.py, line 122 in run File /usr/local/lib/python3.4/unittest/suite.py, line 84 in __call__ File /usr/local/lib/python3.4/unittest/suite.py, line 122 in run File /usr/local/lib/python3.4/unittest/suite.py, line 84 in __call__ File /usr/local/lib/python3.4/unittest/runner.py, line 168 in run File /usr/local/lib/python3.4/test/support/__init__.py, line 1769 in _run_suite File /usr/local/lib/python3.4/test/support/__init__.py, line 1803 in run_unittest File /usr/local/lib/python3.4/test/regrtest.py, line 1279 in test_runner File /usr/local/lib/python3.4/test/regrtest.py, line 1280 in runtest_inner File /usr/local/lib/python3.4/test/regrtest.py, line 978 in runtest File /usr/local/lib/python3.4/test/regrtest.py, line 763 in main File /usr/local/lib/python3.4/test/regrtest.py, line 1564 in main_in_temp_cwd File /usr/local/lib/python3.4/test/__main__.py, line 3 in module File /usr/local/lib/python3.4/runpy.py, line 85 in _run_code File /usr/local/lib/python3.4/runpy.py, line 170 in _run_module_as_main Bus Error (core dumped) and test_hash_equality (test.datetimetester.TestTime_Fast) ... Fatal Python error: Bus error Current thread 0x0001 (most recent call first): File /usr/local/lib/python3.4/test/datetimetester.py, line 2155 in test_hash_equality File /usr/local/lib/python3.4/unittest/case.py, line 577 in run File /usr/local/lib/python3.4/unittest/case.py, line 625 in __call__ File /usr/local/lib/python3.4/unittest/suite.py, line 122 in run File /usr/local/lib/python3.4/unittest/suite.py, line 84 in __call__ File /usr/local/lib/python3.4/unittest/suite.py, line 122 in run File /usr/local/lib/python3.4/unittest/suite.py, line 84 in __call__ File /usr/local/lib/python3.4/unittest/runner.py, line 168 in run File /usr/local/lib/python3.4/test/support/__init__.py, line 1769 in _run_suite File /usr/local/lib/python3.4/test/support/__init__.py, line 1803 in run_unittest File /usr/local/lib/python3.4/test/test_datetime.py, line 45 in test_main File /usr/local/lib/python3.4/test/regrtest.py, line 1280 in runtest_inner File /usr/local/lib/python3.4/test/regrtest.py, line 978 in runtest File /usr/local/lib/python3.4/test/regrtest.py, line 763 in main File /usr/local/lib/python3.4/test/regrtest.py, line 1564 in main_in_temp_cwd File /usr/local/lib/python3.4/test/__main__.py, line 3 in module File /usr/local/lib/python3.4/runpy.py, line 85 in _run_code File /usr/local/lib/python3.4/runpy.py, line 170 in _run_module_as_main Bus Error (core dumped) I then ran the same test through gdb: $ gdb /usr/local/bin/python3.4 GNU gdb (GDB) 7.8.1 snip (gdb) run -m test -v test_hash Starting program: /usr/local/bin/python3.4 -m test -v test_hash [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 1 (LWP 1)] == CPython 3.4.3 (default, Mar 25 2015, 17:35:25) [GCC 4.6.2] == Solaris-2.11-sun4v-sparc-32bit-ELF big-endian == hash algorithm: fnv 32bit == /tmp/test_python_12329 Testing with flags: sys.flags(debug=0, inspect=0, interactive=0, optimize=0, dont_write_bytecode=0, no_user_site=0, no_ site=0, ignore_environment=0, verbose=0, bytes_warning=0, quiet=0, hash_randomization=1, isolated=0) [1/1] test_hash test_empty_string (test.test_hash.BytesHashRandomizationTests) ... ok test_fixed_hash (test.test_hash.BytesHashRandomizationTests) ... ok test_long_fixed_hash (test.test_hash.BytesHashRandomizationTests) ... ok test_null_hash (test.test_hash.BytesHashRandomizationTests) ... ok test_randomized_hash (test.test_hash.BytesHashRandomizationTests) ... ok test_randomized_hash (test.test_hash.DatetimeDateTests) ... ok test_randomized_hash (test.test_hash.DatetimeDatetimeTests) ... FAIL test_randomized_hash (test.test_hash.DatetimeTimeTests) ... FAIL test_hashes (test.test_hash.HashBuiltinsTestCase) ... ok test_hash_distribution (test.test_hash.HashDistributionTestCase) ... ok test_coerced_floats (test.test_hash.HashEqualityTestCase) ... ok test_coerced_integers (test.test_hash.HashEqualityTestCase) ... ok test_numeric_literals (test.test_hash.HashEqualityTestCase) ... ok test_unaligned_buffers (test.test_hash.HashEqualityTestCase) ... Program
[issue23786] test_unaligned_buffers (test.test_hash.HashEqualityTestCase) ... Fatal Python error: Bus error
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +christian.heimes, jcea versions: +Python 3.5 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23786 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: Fwd: test1
On Mar 26, 2015 7:35 AM, Igor Korot ikoro...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:01 AM, alister alister.nospam.w...@ntlworld.com wrote: i hope he has a good spam filter as I am about to sign him up for everything :-) Well he did gave out his private key to the public in an ASCII format. I wonder what people can do with it? ;-) Spamming someone as a response to being spammed is reasonable, in an eye-for-an-eye kind of way (though a bit childish). Hacking their site is not. Besides, it would be a lot more work for you to do anything untoward with it than it would be for him to just change it. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: test1
Your first message was not python related. Your subsequent messages were rude. You've never been here before it seems. This is an interesting group, open to all with interest in python. How do you fit in? Not On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Tiglath Suriol tiglathsur...@gmail.com wrote: On Wednesday, March 25, 2015 at 7:59:34 PM UTC-4, Steven D'Aprano wrote: On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 10:43 am, Tiglath Suriol wrote: I've dealt with people like you in newsgroups for a long time So many years, so little learning. It's arseholes like you who make it so important to invent a way to stab people through the internet. Just go away, you're not wanted here. I may stay a while just to poke you in the eye a little longer. I am beginning to enjoy this. People entering a battle of wits unarmed. It's a joy to watch. You talk as if I wanted you to want me. Pure delusion. I posted at nobody, as I am free to do, and idiots come out of the woodwork as if I had committed some infraction. And you even want to stab me. Sterling. Who raised you. wolves? -- Steven -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list -- Joel Goldstick http://joelgoldstick.com -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[issue23785] Leak in TextIOWrapper.tell()
Benjamin Peterson added the comment: lgtm with a test -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23785 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: Fwd: test1
Apparently Tiglath is a troll: see this: http://www.science-bbs.com/121-math/6b7f8c793e31402e.htm On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com wrote: On Mar 26, 2015 7:35 AM, Igor Korot ikoro...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:01 AM, alister alister.nospam.w...@ntlworld.com wrote: i hope he has a good spam filter as I am about to sign him up for everything :-) Well he did gave out his private key to the public in an ASCII format. I wonder what people can do with it? ;-) Spamming someone as a response to being spammed is reasonable, in an eye-for-an-eye kind of way (though a bit childish). Hacking their site is not. Besides, it would be a lot more work for you to do anything untoward with it than it would be for him to just change it. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list -- Joel Goldstick http://joelgoldstick.com -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[issue23785] Leak in TextIOWrapper.tell()
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: It would be not easy to reproduce without special broken decoder. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23785 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23785] Leak in TextIOWrapper.tell()
Benjamin Peterson added the comment: How did you notice it, btw? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23785 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23676] Add support of UnicodeTranslateError in standard error handlers
STINNER Victor added the comment: I'm sorry, I don't understand this issue. Could you please elaborate the use case? Why do you want to support more error handlers? str.translate() calls _PyUnicode_TranslateCharmap() with errors=ignore, it's not possible to choose the error handler. Many codecs are implemented in Python and some of them are implemented with charmap. Does this issue enhance the codecs implemented with charmap? a\udc80.encode(latin9, surrogatepass) raises UnicodeEncodeError with and without the patch, b\x81.decode(cp1252, surrogatepass) raises UnicodeDecodeError with and without the patch. Hum, I'm not sure that codecs.charmap_build() is related str.translate(). -- nosy: +haypo ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23676 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: sys.exec_prefix doesn't seem to reflect --exec-prefix path
In article 548dcac1-fa00-4fc1-81d1-ccae28caf...@googlegroups.com, Ralph Heinkel ralph.hein...@web.de wrote: on my linux box there is a python version 2.7.5 installed in /usr/local. Now I want to install the newer version 2.7.9, but in a different directory to avoid clashes with the current installation. What I did was: ./configure --prefix /usr/local/Python-2.7.9 --exec-prefix /usr/local/Python-2.7.9 make make install Configure arguments need to be specified with '='. Try instead: ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/Python-2.7.9 And --exec-prefix isn't needed in this case as it defaults to the value of --prefix. -- Ned Deily, n...@acm.org -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[issue23786] test_unaligned_buffers (test.test_hash.HashEqualityTestCase) ... Fatal Python error: Bus error
Peter added the comment: That's not a valid option on SPARC, (see https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/SPARC-Options.html ) the flag is only available on ARM it seems. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23786 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: Best way to calculate fraction part of x?
On 3/24/15 6:39 PM, Jason Swails wrote: On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 8:38 PM, Emile van Sebille em...@fenx.com mailto:em...@fenx.com wrote: On 3/23/2015 5:52 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: Are there any other, possibly better, ways to calculate the fractional part of a number? float ((%6.3f % x)[-4:]) In general you lose a lot of precision this way... I suggest modf in the math library: math.modf(x) Return the fractional and integer parts of x. Both results carry the sign of x and are floats. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[issue23786] test_unaligned_buffers (test.test_hash.HashEqualityTestCase) ... Fatal Python error: Bus error
Peter added the comment: I've compiled Python 3.3.6 using the same options (./configure --prefix=/usr/local --enable-shared) and build system and that passes almost all the tests (test_uuid fails for an ignorable reason). Specifically test_hash passes fully: $ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/src/Python-3.3.6 ./python -m test -v test_hash == CPython 3.3.6 (default, Mar 26 2015, 15:35:36) [GCC 4.6.2] == Solaris-2.11-sun4v-sparc-32bit-ELF big-endian == /usr/local/src/Python-3.3.6/build/test_python_4539 Testing with flags: sys.flags(debug=0, inspect=0, interactive=0, optimize=0, dont_write_bytecode=0, no_user_site=0, no_site=0, ignore_environment=0, verbose=0, bytes_warning=0, quiet=0, hash_randomization=1) [1/1] test_hash test_empty_string (test.test_hash.BytesHashRandomizationTests) ... ok test_fixed_hash (test.test_hash.BytesHashRandomizationTests) ... ok test_null_hash (test.test_hash.BytesHashRandomizationTests) ... ok test_randomized_hash (test.test_hash.BytesHashRandomizationTests) ... ok test_randomized_hash (test.test_hash.DatetimeDateTests) ... ok test_randomized_hash (test.test_hash.DatetimeDatetimeTests) ... ok test_randomized_hash (test.test_hash.DatetimeTimeTests) ... ok test_hashes (test.test_hash.HashBuiltinsTestCase) ... ok test_coerced_floats (test.test_hash.HashEqualityTestCase) ... ok test_coerced_integers (test.test_hash.HashEqualityTestCase) ... ok test_numeric_literals (test.test_hash.HashEqualityTestCase) ... ok test_unaligned_buffers (test.test_hash.HashEqualityTestCase) ... ok test_default_hash (test.test_hash.HashInheritanceTestCase) ... ok test_error_hash (test.test_hash.HashInheritanceTestCase) ... ok test_fixed_hash (test.test_hash.HashInheritanceTestCase) ... ok test_hashable (test.test_hash.HashInheritanceTestCase) ... ok test_not_hashable (test.test_hash.HashInheritanceTestCase) ... ok test_empty_string (test.test_hash.MemoryviewHashRandomizationTests) ... ok test_fixed_hash (test.test_hash.MemoryviewHashRandomizationTests) ... ok test_null_hash (test.test_hash.MemoryviewHashRandomizationTests) ... ok test_randomized_hash (test.test_hash.MemoryviewHashRandomizationTests) ... ok test_empty_string (test.test_hash.StrHashRandomizationTests) ... ok test_fixed_hash (test.test_hash.StrHashRandomizationTests) ... ok test_null_hash (test.test_hash.StrHashRandomizationTests) ... ok test_randomized_hash (test.test_hash.StrHashRandomizationTests) ... ok -- Ran 25 tests in 1.356s OK 1 test OK. So any ideas what I should look for? Or perhaps it would be helpful if I posted config.log, etc. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23786 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: test1
On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 10:00:56 -0700, Tiglath Suriol wrote: I posted two test messages containing code. No, you excreted a pile of steaming excrement and have continued to do so. Your original post in this thread had no relevance to the newsgroup or the gated mailing list, it was purely internet vandalism, and your ongoing posts are simply trolling. -- Denis McMahon, denismfmcma...@gmail.com -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Best way to calculate fraction part of x?
On 23 March 2015 at 12:52, Steven D'Aprano steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote: I have a numeric value, possibly a float, Decimal or (improper) Fraction, and I want the fractional part. E.g. fract(2.5) should give 0.5. Here are two ways to do it: py x = 2.5 py x % 1 0.5 py x - int(x) 0.5 x % 1 is significantly faster, but has the disadvantage of giving the complement of the fraction if x is negative: py x = -2.75 py x % 1 0.25 The other version gives -0.75 in this case so I guess that's what you want. Are there any other, possibly better, ways to calculate the fractional part of a number? What do you mean by better? Is it just faster? To modify the % version so that it's equivalent you can do: x = -2.75 (x % 1) - (x 0) -0.75 I'm not sure if that's faster than x - int(x) though. Obviously it depends which numeric type you're primarily interested in. Oscar -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Fwd: test1
On Thursday, March 26, 2015 at 4:01:08 PM UTC-4, BartC wrote: On 26/03/2015 15:38, Tiglath Suriol wrote: I did not spam anyone. I posted to an open public newsgroup. Just some code, nothing offensive or even directed to anyone. Then people started to get cute, and now that returned fire is a bucket a drop they complaints like bitches on the rag. Not surprised, but not SPAM either. If anyone pull a newsgroup into his email that's his doing, not mine. There are 100,000 different public newsgroups for a reason: they are all about different subjects. Your post had nothing to do with Python that I could see. A polite post at last. How refreshing. That would be two off-topic posts I submitted. All the replies to it were also off-topic, so it can't possibly be such a big crime. To post test messages, try alt.test. Otherwise the newsgroup would get swamped if everyone posted irrelevant random stuff. Say that too to the imbeciles who jumped from the woodwork and made any swamping I may have caused much worst. The reaction has been far worse than my action. This stems from regular posters of a newsgroup developing a sense of entitlement and turf, which is purely imaginary. This is a public place and everyone has the tools to ignore posts and posters. They just wanted to play and mock and got burned. BTW why /did/ you choose this newsgroup? I just needed to save some code and there was no email at hand, I use this because it's a group I am familiar with, alt.test sounds like a better option. Thanks -- Bartc -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[issue23786] test_unaligned_buffers (test.test_hash.HashEqualityTestCase) ... Fatal Python error: Bus error
Changes by STINNER Victor victor.stin...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +haypo ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23786 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: Best way to calculate fraction part of x?
On 3/24/2015 6:39 PM, Jason Swails wrote: On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 8:38 PM, Emile van Sebille em...@fenx.com snip float ((%6.3f % x)[-4:]) In general you lose a lot of precision this way... Even more if you use %6.1 -- but feel free to flavor to taste. :) Emile -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: test1
On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 14:06:28 -0700 (PDT), marcuslom...@gmail.com wrote: I posted two test messages containing code. They are still there, are you blind as well as dumb? Your post is also off-topic, so what are you whining about, girl? You can ignore my posts almost effortlessly, the fact that you prefer to inveigh in your rant means that you want to be part of this. I'll be happy to oblige, bozo. Make my day. Hush now, little baby troll. Don't get all teary on us. Calm down. Just a little while ago you were saying you didn't care about what people said. So don't care about what people say. BTW, you are as stupid as you are an ignorant little trapped troll. You purportedly spammed this place and now we are having fun telling you all about it. Boo hoo! Now, remember what you said... -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[issue23786] test_unaligned_buffers (test.test_hash.HashEqualityTestCase) ... Fatal Python error: Bus error
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Yes, 3.3 uses less efficient implementation. Try to compile Python with gcc option -mno-unaligned-access. -- nosy: +mark.dickinson ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23786 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: test1
On 2015-03-26 08:33, Tiglath Suriol wrote: Mark Lawrence I don't remember addressing his guy, HE addressed me FIRST, as all of you did, Hmmm...To what then has he been replying? *You* posted/broadcast the FIRST message which addressed every member of the list. If you don't want to address every member of a list, try not posting. Or at least expect replies. now you complaint you don't like my replies. Mostly it's your uncivil tone that people seem to be complaining about. Reading over the messages in the thread, it's mostly *you* complaining about replies. And you that keeps fanning the flame. I came here because I can and may. And folks here replied. Because they can and may. And you're not kidding anybody: your bravado and insults against a plurality of respected community members only amplifies your own appearance of folly. -tkc -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
