Re: Basic importing question

2008-08-20 Thread Bruno Desthuilliers

Hussein B a écrit :

Hey,
Suppose I have a Python application consists of many modules (lets say
it is a Django application).
If all the modules files are importing sys module, how many times the
sys module will be compiled and executed?
Only once (the first time the PVM locates, compiles and executes the
sys module)? or once for each module importing sys?


Hmmm Well, could it be possible that Python's developper were smart 
enough to implement some cache mechanism here ?-)


import do (approximately) the following:

check if the module already exists in sys.modules
if not:
  locate the module's source in sys.path
  if not found
raise an import error
  look for a compiled .py file
  if there's none, or if there's one and it's older than the .py file:
compile the source and save it as .pyc
  execute the .pyc file and build a module object from it
  add the module object to sys.modules
bind the relevant names into your current namespace
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Basic importing question

2008-08-20 Thread John Machin
On Aug 20, 8:08 pm, Hussein B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hey,
 Suppose I have a Python application consists of many modules (lets say
 it is a Django application).
 If all the modules files are importing sys module, how many times the
 sys module will be compiled and executed?
 Only once (the first time the PVM locates, compiles and executes the
 sys module)? or once for each module importing sys?
 Thanks.

sys is a built-in module, so the answer is zero times.

For a non-builtin module foo where there exists:
(1) only a foo.py, it will be compiled into foo.pyc
(2) only a foo.pyc, it will be used
(3) both a foo.py and a foo.pyc, Python compiles the foo.py if the pyc
is out of date or (so I believe [*]) was created by a different
version of Python.

Subsequent imports will use the in-memory copy (in sys.modules, IIRC
[*]) ...

[*] == Please save me the bother of checking this in the manual :-)

HTH,
John
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Basic importing question

2008-08-20 Thread Hussein B
On Aug 20, 5:43 am, John Machin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Aug 20, 8:08 pm, Hussein B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Hey,
  Suppose I have a Python application consists of many modules (lets say
  it is a Django application).
  If all the modules files are importing sys module, how many times the
  sys module will be compiled and executed?
  Only once (the first time the PVM locates, compiles and executes the
  sys module)? or once for each module importing sys?
  Thanks.

 sys is a built-in module, so the answer is zero times.

 For a non-builtin module foo where there exists:
 (1) only a foo.py, it will be compiled into foo.pyc
 (2) only a foo.pyc, it will be used
 (3) both a foo.py and a foo.pyc, Python compiles the foo.py if the pyc
 is out of date or (so I believe [*]) was created by a different
 version of Python.

 Subsequent imports will use the in-memory copy (in sys.modules, IIRC
 [*]) ...

 [*] == Please save me the bother of checking this in the manual :-)

 HTH,
 John

Thank you both for your kind help and patience :)
Built-in modules are compiled but even if they are so, when importing
them (sys for example), Python will run their code in order to create
bindings and objects, right?
I'm learning Python and I want to learn it well, so that I'm asking a
lot :)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Basic importing question

2008-08-20 Thread Hussein B
On Aug 20, 5:43 am, John Machin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Aug 20, 8:08 pm, Hussein B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Hey,
  Suppose I have a Python application consists of many modules (lets say
  it is a Django application).
  If all the modules files are importing sys module, how many times the
  sys module will be compiled and executed?
  Only once (the first time the PVM locates, compiles and executes the
  sys module)? or once for each module importing sys?
  Thanks.

 sys is a built-in module, so the answer is zero times.

 For a non-builtin module foo where there exists:
 (1) only a foo.py, it will be compiled into foo.pyc
 (2) only a foo.pyc, it will be used
 (3) both a foo.py and a foo.pyc, Python compiles the foo.py if the pyc
 is out of date or (so I believe [*]) was created by a different
 version of Python.

 Subsequent imports will use the in-memory copy (in sys.modules, IIRC
 [*]) ...

 [*] == Please save me the bother of checking this in the manual :-)

 HTH,
 John

One more question:
If I have this structure:
orig/com/domain/project/Klass1.py
Klass2.py
__init__.py

Why com, domain, project should have __init__.py also? they don't
contain source code files?
Thanks again.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Basic importing question

2008-08-20 Thread Bruno Desthuilliers

Hussein B a écrit :
(snip)

One more question:
If I have this structure:
orig/com/domain/project/Klass1.py
Klass2.py
__init__.py

Why com, domain, project should have __init__.py also?


Yes, why should they ? Unless you want to mimic Java's package system so 
you do import com.domain.project.stuff - which is IMHO a pretty bad 
idea -, there's just no reason to turn all your filesystem into a python 
package.


Python's philosophy here is that flat is better than nested.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Basic importing question

2008-08-20 Thread Christian Heimes

Hussein B wrote:

Thank you both for your kind help and patience :)
Built-in modules are compiled but even if they are so, when importing
them (sys for example), Python will run their code in order to create
bindings and objects, right?
I'm learning Python and I want to learn it well, so that I'm asking a
lot :)


Yes, Python has to compile and execute the module before it can be used. 
But this happens only *once* for every module during the life time of a 
Python process. In Python modules are singletons. The second import just 
retrieves the module for an internal cache (sys.modules) and stores it 
in the current namespace.


The answer to your question If all the modules files are importing sys 
module, how many times the sys module will be compiled and executed? is 
 once.


By the way sys is a very special module, which is *always* loaded and 
initialized durings startup. The sys module is not only a builtin module 
 (embeded into the Python executable / library). It's also part of the 
heart of Python and treated more special than any other module.


Christian

--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Basic importing question

2008-08-20 Thread Hussein B
On Aug 20, 6:39 am, Bruno Desthuilliers bruno.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hussein B a écrit :
 (snip)

  One more question:
  If I have this structure:
  orig/com/domain/project/Klass1.py
  Klass2.py
  __init__.py

  Why com, domain, project should have __init__.py also?

 Yes, why should they ? Unless you want to mimic Java's package system so
 you do import com.domain.project.stuff - which is IMHO a pretty bad
 idea -, there's just no reason to turn all your filesystem into a python
 package.

 Python's philosophy here is that flat is better than nested.

Sorry I don't follow you :(
Module package is also nested.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Basic importing question

2008-08-20 Thread Bruno Desthuilliers

Hussein B a écrit :
(snip)

Thank you both for your kind help and patience :)
Built-in modules are compiled


For which definition of compiled ?


but even if they are so, when importing
them (sys for example), Python will run their code in order to create
bindings and objects, right?


As the name imply, built-in modules are built in the interpreter - IOW, 
they are part of the interpreter *exposed* as modules[1]. Unless you 
have a taste for gory implementation details, just don't worry about this.


Other ordinary modules need of course to be executed once when first 
loaded - IOW, the first time they are imported. All statements[2] at the 
top-level of the module are then sequentially executed, so that any 
relevant object (functions, classes, whatever) are created and bound in 
the module's namespace.



[1] There's an ambiguity with the term module, which is used for both 
the module object (instance of class 'module') that exists at runtime 
and the .py source file a module object is usually - but not necessarily 
- built from.



[2]  'def' and 'class' are executable statements that create resp. a 
function or class object and bind them to the function/class name in the 
containing namespace.

--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Basic importing question

2008-08-20 Thread Scott David Daniels

Hussein B wrote:

On Aug 20, 6:39 am, Bruno Desthuilliers bruno.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hussein B a écrit :

One more question:
If I have this structure:
orig/com/domain/project/Klass1.py
Klass2.py
__init__.py
Why com, domain, project should have __init__.py also?

Yes, why should they ? Unless you want to mimic Java's package system so
you do import com.domain.project.stuff - which is IMHO a pretty bad
idea -, there's just no reason to turn all your filesystem into a python
package.

Python's philosophy here is that flat is better than nested.


Sorry I don't follow you :(
Module package is also nested.


Essentially, flatter is better than more nested -- in other words
the things you see after import this are principles to trend towards,
not commandments to never be violated.  Some structure is better
than no structure, but that doesn't mean more structure is better
ad infinitum.  Lists of length 1, modules containing a single class,
dictionaries with a single entry, functions or methods that simply
return a variable or instance are code smells for over-exercise of
structuring for its own sake.  Each layer should have enough structure
that it is worth replacing the more straightforward access with a
name.
Similarly, the name should be associated with few enough things
that you might reasonably expect to hold its scope in your head.
A layer with fifty elements smells as bad as one with a single
element, just in a different way.

--Scott David Daniels
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Basic importing question

2008-08-20 Thread Christian Heimes

Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
As the name imply, built-in modules are built in the interpreter - IOW, 
they are part of the interpreter *exposed* as modules[1]. Unless you 
have a taste for gory implementation details, just don't worry about this.


Other ordinary modules need of course to be executed once when first 
loaded - IOW, the first time they are imported. All statements[2] at the 
top-level of the module are then sequentially executed, so that any 
relevant object (functions, classes, whatever) are created and bound in 
the module's namespace.


Builtin modules like thread, signal etc. as well as C extensions like 
socket have an initialization function. The initialization function is 
called during the first import of a module. It creates the module object 
and assigns objects to its __dict__ attribute.


Builtin modules are statically linked into the Python executable / 
library while normal C extensions are shared libraries. Some modules are 
builtins because they are required during boot strapping. It's possible 
to embed most C modules into the core.


Christian

--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list