Re: [QGIS-Developer] Problem compiling QGIS on Debian stretch
On 2020-02-26 15:01, Tom Palan wrote: I am having problems compiling QGIS 3.10.3 on Debian stretch. The compile does work flawlessly on Debian buster. Is compiling on Debian stretch not supported anymore? The upstream packaging removed support for stretch (and xenial): https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/commit/206cc96014ce3c4d949338c7e35ab778f4ed79c8 Kind Regards, Bas ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [QGIS-Developer] Good news: next Ubuntu version shipping with gdal3/proj6
On 2020-02-18 11:00, Mathieu Pellerin wrote: Any plan to update QGIS to 3.10? 3.4 reaches it's end of life in the coming few days. Yes, but this will probably be too late for focal, as recently discussed on the Debian GIS list: https://lists.debian.org/debian-gis/2020/01/msg0.html QGIS 3.10.3 (the first 3.10 in the Long-Term Repo which the package in Debian tracks) is (now) scheduled for release on the 21st and the Debian import freeze for focal is on the 27th. I may not be able to get QGIS 3.10 into Debian unstable (from which Ubuntu syncs by default) before the import freeze, e.g. if it takes more than a few days for the FTP masters to review the package in the NEW queue. Another possibility is that the build fails on certain architectures which will prevent the package in Ubuntu from moving out of the proposed pocket. The 3.10.3 release was scheduled on the 27th before, as mentioned on the debian-gis list, that would have made it pretty much impossible to get it into focal. Because there is no one that actively maintains the geospatial packages in Ubuntu, QGIS and JOSM users should use the packages provided from their upstream repos instead which are actively updated with new releases. Kind Regards, Bas ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [QGIS-Developer] Good news: next Ubuntu version shipping with gdal3/proj6
On 2020-02-18 10:45, Denis Rouzaud wrote: Is this correct that it has now been upgraded to 3.0.4? Yes, see: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdal The package is now in "release (universe)" instead of "proposed (universe)". Kind Regards, Bas ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [QGIS-Developer] Certificate for https://feed.qgis.org/ expired
On 2020-02-18 08:57, Paolo Cavallini wrote: Isn't it under letsencrypt auto renew? It's an Let's Encrypt certificate, but autorenewal can fail due to load on their side. I see this for my certs quite frequently. Also ensure that certbot or another ACME client you use it updated to be still supported by LE, e.g. TLS-SNI-01 is no longer supported for which the certbot got a stable update in Debian. Kind Regards, Bas ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [QGIS-Developer] 3.10 packages for Debian testing/unstable are temporarily uninstallable
On 2019-11-19 13:56, Lior Kaplan wrote: When do we expect to have a rebuild of the Debian testing/unstable builds? Should be fixed with the next release schedule for coming Friday. This is a known issue with dependencies from testing/unstable as clearly noted on the download page: " The release packages are only produced once shortly after a new version has been released. As unstable, not yet released debian versions (testing) and ubuntugis-unstable can have library changes the packages might sooner or later be broken for these targets, when the development in debian, ubuntu or ubuntugis-unstable moves on and their packages used as dependencies in qgis change. In that event you can either * move to a stable debian version and use the released packages for it, * wait for the next point release (due 2019-11-22 12:00:00 UTC), which happens every month and will include the updated dependencies, * switch to a nightly repository (available for the two release branches and master) whose packages are rebuild on regular basis and will also pickup the updated dependencies automatically or * build your own set of packages (see INSTALL). " https://qgis.org/en/site/forusers/alldownloads.html#debian-ubuntu The current packages at don't have this fix: https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/commit/f67369cc2639f513c77ef3e3c606f96294d9fa47 Note the followup: https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/commit/8fedf7c72a3c1001783923f5c85e3c47fe72a011 Kind Regards, Bas ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [QGIS-Developer] Why packaging python-gdal with Qgis3 ?
On 2019-11-19 08:38, David Marteau wrote: Just a question: why python-gdal is still required for installing Qgis3 debian packages ? Because it provided the Python scripts until 2.4.3+dfsg-1, they've since moved to gdal-bin. Kind Regards, Bas ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [QGIS-Developer] OTB and QGIS
On 2019-10-21 10:51, Rashad Kanavath wrote: If the fix is to be done in packaging. I think someone in otb team can forward to debain gis. The Debian GIS team doesn't maintain the upstream QGIS packaging. Kind Regards, Bas ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [QGIS-Developer] [GRASS-dev] Bump to proj 6/gdal 3
On 2019-07-23 10:49, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: Is OTB PROJ 6 ready yet? OTB doesn't link to libproj. The otb Debian package has a patch for GDAL 3. See also the PROJ 6.0.0 [0], PROJ 6.1.1 [1] & GDAL 2.5.0 [2] threads on the Debian GIS list. [0] https://lists.debian.org/debian-gis/2019/04/msg4.html [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-gis/2019/07/msg2.html [2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-gis/2019/04/msg00012.html Kind Regards, Bas ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [QGIS-Developer] Bump to proj 6/gdal 3
On 2019-07-23 10:23, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote: What's the state of GRASS with PROJ 6? 7.6.1 builds successfully when you define ACCEPT_USE_OF_DEPRECATED_PROJ_API_H. 7.6.0 fails due to the removal of nad2bin in PROJ 6. Kind Regards, Bas ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [QGIS-Developer] Bump to proj 6/gdal 3
On 2019-07-23 09:35, Paolo Cavallini wrote: For reference, in Debian Sid proj6 and gdal3 are still in experimental. And GDAL 3 is staying there at least until fiona supports it. Kind Regards, Bas ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [QGIS-Developer] qgis2web and qtwebkit?
On 2018-09-17 10:24, Tom Chadwin wrote: - are there any other reasons that migrating from Webkit is required under Qt5? Qt upstream stopped developing QtWebKit and switched its focus to QtWebEngine, the former will most likely be removed from Qt5 at some point, see: http://blog.qt.io/blog/2013/09/12/introducing-the-qt-webengine/ Kind Regards, Bas ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [QGIS-Developer] Problem with 3D during compilation in debian sid
On 2018-04-10 16:49, Bas Couwenberg wrote: On 2018-04-10 16:37, matteo wrote: absolutely no idea why. Perhaps there were removed in the new qt3d-opensource-src (5.10.1+dfsg-3), note the ongoing transition: https://bugs.debian.org/893523 The Qt3DExtras includes are no longer included in qt3d5-dev, confirmed with: apt-file show qt3d5-dev | grep Qt3DExtras Kind Regards, Bas ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [QGIS-Developer] Problem with 3D during compilation in debian sid
On 2018-04-10 16:37, matteo wrote: absolutely no idea why. Perhaps there were removed in the new qt3d-opensource-src (5.10.1+dfsg-3), note the ongoing transition: https://bugs.debian.org/893523 As I said the re-installation did not changed anything. Should I manually copy some files into "include"? No, you should not modify package paths. Kind Regards, Bas ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [QGIS-Developer] proj5 and epsg:3857 ?
On 2018-03-08 08:43, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote: As we have OSM xyz layer now, and I think a lot of people will use it as a quick reference map, we should be carefull to include proj5 in distributions/installs then I think? Like: let's not put proj5 as default in Osgeo4w untill this is fixed/released. When distributions don't adopt proj 5.0.0 it won't get much real world usage and hence won't uncover other regressions that should be fixed in the next release. There were many release candidates, but only a handful of testers. OSGeo projects should get more involved testing new core library release candidates to catch regressions like these earlier. Kind Regards, Bas ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS in UbuntuGIS (join forces)
On 2018-03-05 16:36, Martin Landa wrote: The most important would be to maintain packages in same git repo [2]. What do you think? Best, Martin No likely to happen. The upstream packaging is separate from the one in Debian and Ubuntu, and by extension in UbuntuGIS. The oracle changes in the upstream package are not appropriate for UbuntuGIS for example. I'd rather see UbuntuGIS disappear and have people working on maintaining proper backports in Ubuntu itself in collaboration with maintainers in Debian. But due to the lack of manpower the status quo is most likely to remain. Kind Regards, Bas ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] qgis 3 still includes qt4+py2 stuff and missing _gdal_array.pyd
On 2017-05-03 16:23, Idan Miara wrote: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named '_gdal_array' That sounds like: https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/6801 OSGeo4W probably needs to include the patch for that issue like the Debian package does. Kind Regards, Bas ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] apt-get install errors
On 2017-04-12 13:31, Paolo Cavallini wrote: Trovato:3 http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntugis/ubuntugis-unstable/ubuntu [...] Trovato:5 http://qgis.org/ubuntugis xenial InRelease [...] qgis : Dipende: gdal-abi-2-1-3 ubuntugis-unstable has GDAL 2.1.3, but the qgis.org packages have not been (re)built with that version yet. Disable the qgis.org repo and install qgis from ubuntugis-unstable, or vice versa. Kind Regards, Bas ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] SAGA GIS 3.0
On 2016-12-13 14:30, Ted wrote: The current QGIS ships with SAGA-GIS 2.1.2. There are many version since 2.1.2 and the latest version of SAGA-GIS is 3.0 Wonder if QGIS 3.0 will use SAGA-GIS 3.0. Unlikely since its not a long term supported release. The 2.3.x LTS releases from SAGA are not properly supported in QGIS yet either. Kind Regards, BAs ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Difficulties with the compilation of the plugin Globe
On 2016-11-09 11:30, Elsa Darroman wrote: We want to launch Globe automatically from our plugin when the user open some GPS tracks but we find only the function in python : iface.utils.plugins['name_plugin'] but not in c++. Is there a way in c++ to call an already implemented plugin from our plugin ? I don't know, but I suspect Pirmin (CCed) does as he's been most involved in the globe plugin. Kind Regards, Bas ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Difficulties with the compilation of the plugin Globe
On 2016-11-09 11:26, Matthias Kuhn wrote: For more details, have a look at this discussion which provides some insights and an experimental patch: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Future-of-the-Globe-plugin-in-QGIS-3-with-Qt5-td5288268.html That's about osgEarth 2.8, which is still in Debian experimental because QGIS doesn't support it yet, not even QGIS 3.0 which benefits from the Qt5 support in osgEarth 2.8. QGIS 2.14 LTR doesn't support osgEarth 2.7 which is in Debian testing/unstable and hence the globe plugin is disabled in those distributions. QGIS >= 2.16 does support osgEarth 2.7, but not 2.5 in Debian jessie and QGIS disables the globe plugin for the unsupported osgEarth versions. Kind Regards, Bas ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Difficulties with the compilation of the plugin Globe
On 2016-11-09 10:14, Elsa Darroman wrote: We worked on debian 8.4 with Qgis 2.14.8 (latest version of 2.14) and Qt 4.8. One of the instructions is to use and compile the plugin Globe to open the tracks in 3D. The problem is the compilation of the plugin Globe. We isolated it, tried to resolve all the errors the isolation of the plugin and when we succeeded the plugin compiled but not in a proper way: the file of library (.so) is copied with the others in /usr/lib/qgis/plugins but the plugin is not find by QGIS. Have you any ideas to help us ? The qgis package in jessie-backports should have the globe plugin enabled already, so you don't need to compile it. It may be that the recent updates disabled it again as the globe plugin doesn't support the osgearth version in testing/unstable. Kind Regards, Bas ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] No vector output with GRASS Processing
On 2016-06-22 10:28, matteo wrote: grass 6 is the one on the official Debian stable repository. grass 7 should be compiled. Users of the GRASS packages on Debian stable has not expressed a need for GRASS 7 backports, so no attempt has been made to provide backports for GRASS 7. Please refer to the thread on the debian-gis list: https://lists.debian.org/debian-gis/2016/04/msg00049.html If there is significant demand expressed for GRASS 7 packages on Debian stable, I'll reconsider providing a backport. Kind Regards, Bas ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] QtWebKit no longer deprecated!
On 2016-06-20 11:56, Matthias Kuhn wrote: On 06/20/2016 06:44 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: Distros have not adopted this yet, beware of premature celebration. Did Debian also remove the Qt5 version of QtWebKit now? No, WebKit support was only removed from the python-qt4 because Qt4 is EOL making security support for such a security issue prone component infeasible. WebKit support may still be removed from Qt4, but the Qt maintainers have not made a final decision on that yet. Kind Regards, Bas ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Build issue on Ubuntu 16.04 xenial with release-2_14 : crssync target failed
On 2016-06-08 14:17, kimaidou wrote: It appears I had 2 gdal installed : one by qgis from qgis.org repository ( 1.11) which corresponds to /usr/lib/libgdal.so and one installed via apt-get install gdal-bin from repositories (2.1) which corresponds to : /usr/local/lib/libgdal.so You got this the wrong way around, the package gdal is installed in /usr/lib, you custom build in /usr/local/lib. The /usr/local hierarchy is reserverd for the local administrator, /usr for the system. Kind Regards, Bas ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Build issue on Ubuntu 16.04 xenial with release-2_14 : crssync target failed
On 2016-06-08 11:46, kimaidou wrote: Here are the command lines used to make gdalinfo happy (quite hackish ... ) ln -s /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgif.so /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgif.so.4 ln -s /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnetcdf.so /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnetcdf.so.7 echo "/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/" >> /etc/ld.so.conf.d/qgis.conf ldconfig Please don't ever create your own library symlinks, this is always wrong. You need to rebuild your GDAL with the currently installed dependencies, as it looks like you upgraded the system packages but never rebuilt your custom GDAL after you upgraded your Ubuntu system to xenial. Kind Regards, Bas ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] What is the name for "pyspatialite" package in fedora 19?
On 2016-06-06 16:59, 童言 wrote: My qgis misses pyspatialite module when it runs in Fedora 19. But I can't find "pyspatialite" package in the URL http://rpm.pbone.net/, so what is the name for "pyspatialite" package in fedora 19? pyspatialite is not packaged for Fedora (only libspatialite, spatialite-tools & spatialite-gui). On Fedora you should use the embedded copy included in the QGIS source. Kind Regards, Bas ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] (Yet again) SAGA support badly broken in QGIS
I notice a distinct lack of consideration for the SAGA LTR effort. That removes the need to incorporate SAGA into QGIS, and provides a stable API for 3rd parties to work with. I suggest to support the LTR effort by Johan van de Wauw, and only consider incorporating SAGA into QGIS if the LTR effort proves to not resolve the integration issues. Kind Regards, Bas ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Qt5 and Python 3
On 2016-05-17 08:08, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote: Next try will then be on compiling on Debian testing... Not sure if Bas knows if there is a chance that those qt5 version will come into Jessie. But I understand Jurgen also has been busy to create packages for the time (Qt4-)Webkit is removed from repo's. So for normal installation there is a solution too. The Qt packages are highly unlikely to be backported to jessie. For the qt5 build of the Debian package maintained by the Debian GIS team, I'm using the Python 2 dependencies for Qt5 which seem to work quite nicely. https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-grass/qgis.git/log/?h=qt5 Kind Regards, Bas ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Qt5 and Python 3
On 2016-05-04 17:36, Larry Shaffer wrote: Debian will switch to Qt5 with QGIS 2.16, otherwise there will be no QGIS in the next stable release. The Qt4 builds currently still work because the Qt maintainers didn't want to break QGIS before Qt5 support is available, but the Qt4WebKit removal changes have already been committed and will be included in the next upload. The upload may happen sooner than we'd like if important bugfixes need to be uploaded in the near future. The changes affecting QGIS is the next stable release will arrive earlier than a year from now. The freeze was planned for 5 November 2016, but has been moved two months to align with the expected 4.10 kernel release. [0] With the full freeze in February 2016, I expect the release to happen in Q3 2016, may be even Q4. The Qt4WebKit removal will happen before the transition freeze on 5 November 2016. Thanks for the clear and concise summary of this dependency issue. Do you mean "February 2017" and "Q3 2017" here? Yes, obviously. Only the transition freeze still happens this year. Everything else in 2017. Kind Regards, Bas ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Qt5 and Python 3
On 2016-05-04 15:08, Matthias Kuhn wrote: For the upstream QGIS packages this may be an option, for the official packages in the Debian archive it is not. Understandable. I had a look at past Debian releases, extrapolating the release cycle we can expect the next release to happen in about a year. I don't expect a first QGIS release based on Qt5 to happen considerably earlier. The first LTR based on Qt5 will certainly not happen earlier. Just to make sure we talk about the same order of delays. (Note: this timeline has not been officially approved) Debian will switch to Qt5 with QGIS 2.16, otherwise there will be no QGIS in the next stable release. The Qt4 builds currently still work because the Qt maintainers didn't want to break QGIS before Qt5 support is available, but the Qt4WebKit removal changes have already been committed and will be included in the next upload. The upload may happen sooner than we'd like if important bugfixes need to be uploaded in the near future. The changes affecting QGIS is the next stable release will arrive earlier than a year from now. The freeze was planned for 5 November 2016, but has been moved two months to align with the expected 4.10 kernel release. [0] With the full freeze in February 2016, I expect the release to happen in Q3 2016, may be even Q4. The Qt4WebKit removal will happen before the transition freeze on 5 November 2016. Based on the QGIS release schedule as it stands now, the plans for QGIS in Debian are discussed in the "QGIS 2.14 & Qt5" thread on the debian-gis list. [1] That is switching to Qt5 with the 2.16 non-LTR, and switch back to the 3.x LTRs for unstable/testing & backports. The choices for the upstream QGIS packages are not really relevant for Debian, it just makes the packaging changes in Debian less relevant to forward upstream. [0] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2016/03/msg0.html [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-gis/2016/02/msg00037.html Kind Regards, Bas ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Qt5 and Python 3
On 2016-05-04 11:56, Matthias Kuhn wrote: On 05/04/2016 11:14 AM, Bas Couwenberg wrote: On 2016-05-04 11:00, Matthias Kuhn wrote: I tend towards Qt >= 5.7 - on Windows and Mac we control the dependencies, so that should be ok anyway, on Linux we can say "if you want a recent QGIS, get a recent distro". And by the time we actually ship QGIS with a Qt5 dependency there should be a number of distros with Qt 5.7. This rules out backports for Debian stable, so I'm not in favour of this option. The next Debian stable release may support Qt 5.7, but packaging is not on the horizon yet. Qt 5.5.1 is currently in testing/unstable (and Ubuntu xenial) with 5.6 in experimental. I'd like to keep maintaining backports for the most recent LTR because that's in the interest of our users, if dependency requirements make that impossible it's unfortunate but not the end of the world. Wouldn't there be the possibility of shipping Qt, QScintilla and QWT in /opt? I acknowledge that this is not the best solution but it could be a temporary fix. For the upstream QGIS packages this may be an option, for the official packages in the Debian archive it is not. Kind Regards, Bas ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Qt5 and Python 3
On 2016-05-04 11:00, Matthias Kuhn wrote: I tend towards Qt >= 5.7 - on Windows and Mac we control the dependencies, so that should be ok anyway, on Linux we can say "if you want a recent QGIS, get a recent distro". And by the time we actually ship QGIS with a Qt5 dependency there should be a number of distros with Qt 5.7. This rules out backports for Debian stable, so I'm not in favour of this option. The next Debian stable release may support Qt 5.7, but packaging is not on the horizon yet. Qt 5.5.1 is currently in testing/unstable (and Ubuntu xenial) with 5.6 in experimental. I'd like to keep maintaining backports for the most recent LTR because that's in the interest of our users, if dependency requirements make that impossible it's unfortunate but not the end of the world. Kind Regards, Bas ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Help needed setting up Ubuntu build environment
On 2016-02-11 13:11, David Adler wrote: Unfortunately, section 3.3 with the build dependencies is cut off on the right side. Is there another link for the entire document? You can view the raw file via the link in GitHub, or just select the line a drag it to right to reveal the rest of the line. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/qgis/QGIS/master/INSTALL You can also easily install the qgis build dependencies with apt: sudo apt-get build-dep qgis Kind Regards, Bas ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] problem with debian/ubuntu daily builds
On 2016-02-09 10:14, Martin Landa wrote: I am unable to install latest QGIS daily on my Ubuntu machine: Unpacking qgis (1:2.13.0+git20160208+b712f3c+23wily) ... dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/qgis_1%3a2.13.0+git20160208+b712f3c+23wily_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/qgis.bin', which is the diverted version of '/usr/bin/qgis' (package: qgis-plugin-grass) dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe) Processing triggers for mime-support (3.58ubuntu1) ... Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/qgis_1%3a2.13.0+git20160208+b712f3c+23wily_amd64.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Any idea what could be wrong? Ma Looks like missing Breaks/Replaces: qgis-plugin-grass (<< VERSION) on the qgis package. When moving files between packages the new package needs Breaks/Replaces control fields to inform dpkg about files moved from old packages in new packages. The version to use is the package revision the move was made in, all preceding versions will still have the files in the old package. This is documented in Debian Policy chapter 7: https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces Kind Regards, Bas ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] problem with debian/ubuntu daily builds
On 2016-02-09 10:42, Martin Landa wrote: Any idea who to bypass it? Remove the old packages first, then install the new packages again. There won't be any old packags install to conflict with during the upgrade. Kind Regards, Bas ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] problem with debian/ubuntu daily builds
On 2016-02-09 10:56, Martin Landa wrote:
2016-02-09 10:49 GMT+01:00 Bas Couwenberg <sebas...@xs4all.nl>:
Remove the old packages first, then install the new packages again.
There
won't be any old packags install to conflict with during the upgrade.
I already tried that:
sudo apt-get remove `dpkg --get-selections | grep qgis | cut -d' ' -f1
| awk '{printf $1" "}'`
sudo apt-get install qgis python-qgis
It fails with:
Unpacking qgis (1:2.13.0+git20160208+b712f3c+23wily) ...
dpkg: error processing archive
/var/cache/apt/archives/qgis_1%3a2.13.0+git20160208+b712f3c+23wily_amd64.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/qgis.bin', which is the diverted
version of '/usr/bin/qgis' (package: qgis-plugin-grass)
dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe)
...
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/qgis_1%3a2.13.0+git20160208+b712f3c+23wily_amd64.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
If you've verified that no qgis packages are left installed after
removal, there is not much you can do to deal with the broken packaging.
`apt-get -f install qgis pyton-qgis` may work.
Kind Regards,
Bas
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] QGIS deb uninstallable?
On 2016-01-05 08:08, Paolo Cavallini wrote: Thanks for clarifying, and for fixing 2.13. Unfortunately it is not yet on nightly, we'll have to wait until tomorrow I guess (I cannot currently compile it because of the perl migration). Perl 5.22 has already migrated to testing, this shouldn't be an issue for building QGIS. Kind Regards, Bas ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] QGIS deb uninstallable?
On 2016-01-05 11:54, Paolo Cavallini wrote: apt-get install libgsl0-dev Since the transition to GSL 2.x (https://bugs.debian.org/804246), you need to use libgsl-dev instead. libgsl0-dev is provided by libgsl-dev in version 2.x, but the real libgsl0-dev package from GSL 1.x is also still in the archive because the transition hasn't been completed yet and was not coordinated by the gsl maintainer. APT prefers real packages over virtual packages, and picks the old libgsl0-dev as long as GSL 1.x hasn't been removed from the archive. Kind Regards, Bas ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Release schedule discussion - again
On 2015-10-14 11:35, Sandro Santilli wrote: Now the question is: when would a QT5 compatible version be needed ? A Qt5 compatible version is already needed. QGIS is one of the blockers for the Qt4 WebKit removal in Debian for example (see: https://bugs.debian.org/784514). And, would it be ok for it to not be an LTR before Feb 2017 ? For Debian that's probably too late, the freeze in preparation for the stretch stable release will likely happen in November 2016. Kind Regards, Bas ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Release schedule discussion - again
On 2015-10-14 12:12, Sandro Santilli wrote: On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:53:14AM +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote: On 2015-10-14 11:35, Sandro Santilli wrote: >And, would it be ok for it to not be an LTR before Feb 2017 ? For Debian that's probably too late, the freeze in preparation for the stretch stable release will likely happen in November 2016. And would you need an _LTR_ for debian packaging ? Yes, because the LTRs are most suited for backports to stable (as they don't require project upgrades every couple of months). I also don't have the time to keep up with the frequent regular releases (the Debian GIS team is too understaffed for that), so the LTRs are ideal for Debian. Unless someone steps up to maintain the qgis package in Debian, I'm not considering switching back to the regular releases. Kind Regards, Bas ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
