Re: [ql-users] SQL on QDOS
The original idea was to write the parser in archive but in view of the feedback I think we had better think again. Perhaps SuperBasic might be better. Any thoughts? - Original Message - From: "Claude Mourier 00" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 2:52 PM Subject: RE: [ql-users] GCC on QDOS > Finally it woould be a generic parser that can be linked to more than one database engine :-) > > Claude > > -Message d'origine- > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de > FranÃois Van Emelen > Envoyà : vendredi 18 mars 2005 15:50 > à : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Re: [ql-users] GCC on QDOS > > > Claude Mourier 00 schreef: > > To my opinion DataDesign is a better target for such implementation > > > > Claude > > Wouldn't DBAS be another valid candidate? > FranÃois Van Emelen > > > > -Message d'origine- > > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Rich > > Mellor > > Envoyà : dimanche 13 mars 2005 22:32 > > à : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Objet : Re: Re: [ql-users] GCC on QDOS > > > > > > On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 20:43:35 -, jms1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>Albin was toying with the idea of producing a version of SQL to run with > >>archive. > >>Would that be of interest? > > > > > > ___ > QL-Users Mailing List > http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm > > ___ > QL-Users Mailing List > http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [ql-users] SQL on QDOS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 jms1 schrieb: > The original idea was to write the parser in archive but in view of > the feedback I think we had better think again. Perhaps SuperBasic > might be better. Any thoughts? SuperBASIC would be **much** better! wolfgang -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCPJ0uL0KE6Q1yFDcRAp15AJ9dGCYDx9dm2ncywVgoESpz6M3JbwCfUw+J KapugkU7sgSE5iziD9HRvDw= =ES38 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [ql-users] SQL on QDOS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > SuperBASIC would be **much** better! > I once wrote a parser and syntax evaluator, in SuperBasic (and I think, converted it to C68) for a project many years ago - which died a horrible death. The project was code named 'ARSE' and stood for ARchive Syntax Evaluator. It's main purpose was to take a file of Archive procedured, encrypted or not, and produce a SuperBasic file where the Archive stuff was converted to DBAS commands. I even got the screens converted to SuperBasic as well. I managed to find a bug in one of the Quanta library discs where someone has written a huge set of procedures etc to make Archive easy, there was, if I remember, an end if out of sequence with an end while (See, it was that long ago, I can't even remember the syntax !) which Archive seemed to think was ok, but my parser/evaluator didn't like at all. I *might* still have the source code, but it won't be pretty - but it wasn't bad for a first attempt at writing a 'compiler'. Actually, it remains my only attempt ! I know it had at least one bug in it, it didn't handle string expressions very well. If I'm not mistaken, stuff like DATE$(...) broke it. Mhttp://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm