Re: POP LOG
Hi, Thank you. I patched qmail, although I am still having troubles. I guess I am doing something wrong... I was running qmail-pop3d with something like: exec env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:/usr/local/bin" \ tcpserver -H -R 0 pop3 \ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup smashweb.com \ /usr/home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir So after applying the patch I had the log messages showing up on the terminal, so I tried running qmail-pop3d with daemontools, and created a service. run: #!/bin/sh exec env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:/usr/local/bin" \ tcpserver -H -R 0 pop3 \ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup smashweb.com \ /usr/home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir log/run: #!/bin/sh exec setuidgid qmaill multilog t /var/log/qmail/pop3d The tcpserver and multilog processes started up right, the log dir was created, but nothing gets logged, and the POP service deconnects clients shortly after establishing the connection. Any help greatly appreciated... Thank you, Cedric Veilleux, Willy De la Court writes: cedric, check http://www.quint.be/projects/ i have a poplogging patch there for qmail-pop3d and qmail-popup Willy De la Court On Monday, April 16, 2001 01:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: Hi, I need to implement a log for the POP service. Any suggestions? I'll probably have to modify qmail-pop3d's code, any hints? exec env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:/usr/local/bin" \ tcpserver -H -R 0 pop3 \ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup smashweb.com / /usr/home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw / /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir Thank you, Cedric Veilleux
Qmail internal domain routing?
Hi I hope you can point me in the right direction with this one. I have setup qmail, qmail-scanner and courier imap on a test server, what we need to be able to do is only allow certain users access to external e-mail i.e. they can only send internally by default unless we let them do otherwise. To further compound this I need to be able to setup 3 additional servers on our WAN for e-mail to our branch offices. I was thinking that by assigning sub domains to the e.g. office1.domain.com etc... This would enable this to happen via DNS MX records. I would propose to have one system as the server that sends receives all mail from the internet acting as a gateway for our internal network, scanning for viruses using qmail-scanner and mapping email for the few real e-mail address to their internal ones. But I am not sure how to limit only certain users to send mail outside whilst allowing unlimited e-mail internally i.e. across our WAN! Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Iain Morrison _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
qmail Digest 16 Apr 2001 10:00:01 -0000 Issue 1336
qmail Digest 16 Apr 2001 10:00:01 - Issue 1336
Topics (messages 60738 through 60763):
QMail and PHP
60738 by: Christian Maier
60739 by: Lukasz Felsztukier
60740 by: Alex Kramarov
60742 by: Uwe Ohse
Re: Maildir (dir) to file for /var/mail/$USR (Inbox) [imapd]
60741 by: Tim Hunter
60743 by: David Young
60745 by: Robin S. Socha
60749 by: Tim Hunter
60750 by: David Young
60752 by: Tim Hunter
Re: smtp and pop not working
60744 by: Greg White
Re: RFCs?
60746 by: D. J. Bernstein
60751 by: Russ Allbery
60760 by: Andy Bradford
Re: supervise scripts error
60747 by: Nick (Keith) Fish
Re: clustering
60748 by: Nick (Keith) Fish
"an alias can never override a valid user's deliveries" ???
60753 by: Adam Andrzej Jaworski
60754 by: Nick (Keith) Fish
60755 by: Adam Andrzej Jaworski
POP LOG
60756 by: cedric.smashweb.com
60757 by: Rick Updegrove
60758 by: Rick Updegrove
60759 by: Willy De la Court
60762 by: cedric.smashweb.com
Re: Q problem.
60761 by: Rizwan
Qmail internal domain routing?
60763 by: Iain Morrison
Administrivia:
To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To bug my human owner, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To post to the list, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Hi!
I've installed QMail on my Redhat 7.0 system.
PHP uses sendmail but I heard that Qmail has got a sendmail program, too. So
is it possible to send an email per "mail(...)" command of PHP with Qmail? I
copied the Qmail Sendmail to /usr/sbin/sendmail and set the path to QMail
Sendmail in the php.ini, but no EMail are sent and I don't get an error
message!
Thanks
Christian Maier
Christian Maier wrote:
Hi!
I've installed QMail on my Redhat 7.0 system.
PHP uses sendmail but I heard that Qmail has got a sendmail program, too. So
is it possible to send an email per "mail(...)" command of PHP with Qmail? I
copied the Qmail Sendmail to /usr/sbin/sendmail and set the path to QMail
Sendmail in the php.ini, but no EMail are sent and I don't get an error
message!
Hi Christian
I'm using PHP ver. 4.03pl1 and latest qmail. I have to say I was pretty
impressed the way this duo worked 'out of the box'. PHP uses sendmail to
send emails - as far as I know 'qmail' sendmail behaves exactly like the
original. Just check if your paths are OK using ?php phpinfo() ?
command (look for sendmail).
Cheers,
Lukasz
Christian Maier wrote:
Hi!
I've installed QMail on my Redhat 7.0 system.
PHP uses sendmail but I heard that Qmail has got a sendmail program,
too. So
is it possible to send an email per "mail(...)" command of PHP with
Qmail? I
copied the Qmail Sendmail to /usr/sbin/sendmail and set the path to
QMail
Sendmail in the php.ini, but no EMail are sent and I don't get an error
message!
Hi Christian
I'm using PHP ver. 4.03pl1 and latest qmail. I have to say I was pretty
impressed the way this duo worked 'out of the box'. PHP uses sendmail to
send emails - as far as I know 'qmail' sendmail behaves exactly like the
original. Just check if your paths are OK using ?php phpinfo() ?
command (look for sendmail).
well, from my experience php has some problems with qmail's sendmail, but I
was able to get past that by editing php.ini :
sendmail_path=/var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject
works for me ...
On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 01:37:28PM +0200, Lukasz Felsztukier wrote:
I'm using PHP ver. 4.03pl1 and latest qmail. I have to say I was pretty
impressed the way this duo worked 'out of the box'. PHP uses sendmail to
send emails - as far as I know 'qmail' sendmail behaves exactly like the
original.
Sorry, it doesn't.
Sendmail parses addresses given on the command line in the same way it
parses mail headers ("To:"). The qmail sendmail clone doesn't do this.
Qmails sendmail clone doesn't know about a number of sendmail
commandline options. This usually isn't a problem, as almost nobody
knows this options.
And then there is the fact that the original sendmail doesn't
generate "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" addresses ...
Regards, Uwe
Comments about Courier-IMAP. (note. I am biased for Courier-IMAP because I
am a very happy admin and user of it)
It does support folders outside INBOX, if you setup your client correctly.
I use Courier-IMAP daily from Outlook Express, Eudora, and Outlook. I also
access this at times from Mutt locally on the machine. I have never had a
problem with storing "Sent Items" with Outlook Express, but like I said I
have a properly configured client.
I know that Courier-IMAP is a VERY standard imapd, and thats why it doesn't
work around stupid little bugs in many clients. You can ./configure
with
Re: POP LOG
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, I am doing something wrong... run: #!/bin/sh exec env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:/usr/local/bin" \ tcpserver -H -R 0 pop3 \ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup smashweb.com \ /usr/home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir log/run: #!/bin/sh exec setuidgid qmaill multilog t /var/log/qmail/pop3d The tcpserver and multilog processes started up right, the log dir was created, but nothing gets logged, and the POP service deconnects clients shortly after establishing the connection. I am no expert but I think you need the "21" at the end of your qmail-pop3d/run. I know mine has that. I also think you "should" use the softlimit. DJB's page on softlimit http://cr.yp.to/daemontools/softlimit.html bash-2.04# cat /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d/run #!/bin/sh exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 200 \ tcpserver -v -H -R 0 pop-3 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup \ updegrove.net /var/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir 21 bash-2.04# cat /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d/log/run #!/bin/sh exec /usr/local/bin/setuidgid qmaill multilog t /var/log/qmail/pop3d p.s. This guy even uses softlimit in his log/run script, I think I shall update mine asap. http://www.flounder.net/qmail/qmail-howto.html For log/run: #!/bin/sh exec /usr/local/bin/setuidgid qmaill /usr/local/bin/multilog t s250 /var/log/qmail/qmail-smtpd Hope that helped Rick Up
Re: POP LOG
From: "Rick Updegrove" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oops I always do that ... p.s. This guy even uses softlimit in his log/run script, I think I shall update mine asap. http://www.flounder.net/qmail/qmail-howto.html Actually that is NOT softlimit, see http://cr.yp.to/daemontools/multilog.html The action ssize sets the maximum file size for subsequent dir actions For log/run: #!/bin/sh exec /usr/local/bin/setuidgid qmaill /usr/local/bin/multilog t s250 /var/log/qmail/qmail-smtpd
/var/spool/mail/rizwan
how do i configure qmail to deliver mail to /var/spool/mail/username_file. Thats where kmail looks for the mail box. Currently i have a symlink from $HOME/Mailbox to /var/spool/mail/userbox.. It works but still Rizwan -- In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful -- Praise be to Allah, the Cherisher and Sustainer of the world; Most Gracious, Most Merciful; Master of the Day of Judgment. Thee do we worship, and Thine aid we seek. Show us the straight way, The way of those on whom Thou hast bestowed Thy Grace, those whose (portion) is not wrath, and who go not astray. Qur'aan Ch:1
RE: POP LOG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rick, On Monday, April 16, 2001 12:24, Rick Updegrove [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am no expert but I think you need the "21" at the end of your qmail-pop3d/run. I know mine has that. I also think you "should" use the softlimit. You are absolutely right rick the logging is done to stderr and not to stdout so the 21 should do the trick. Willy De la Court -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.3 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com iQA/AwUBOtrQYv4IaGw3x6aJEQIZCQCgl0Gpg3dK0T2SGkABGSgx0iDln5AAoKze j6l1Dhl+1cOJWHq5bIBrKbW9 =D0I/ -END PGP SIGNATURE-
RE: xinetd, tcpwrappers and qmail
Why not use tcpserver?
My experience with xinetd has been terrible.
By the way, try to set RELAYCLIENT="".
-Original Message-
From: John Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: jueves, 12 de abril de 2001 20:28
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: xinetd, tcpwrappers and qmail
I've read through the archives and I'm still having problems
with allowing
selective relaying. Here are the settings that I am using:
/etc/xinetd.conf
defaults
{
log_type = FILE /var/log/servicelog
log_on_success= HOST PID EXIT DURATION
log_on_failure= HOST RECORD
}
service smtp
{
socket_type = stream
wait = no
protocol = tcp
user = qmaild
group = nofiles
flags = REUSE NAMEINARGS
server= /usr/sbin/tcpd
server_args = /var/qmail/bin/tcp-env -R
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
}
hosts.allow
tcp-env: LOCAL, .foo.org, .foo.com: setenv RELAYCLIENT
When I attempt to send mail from localhost (via SMTP) or from
an allowed
domain, I alway receive the message:
553 sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1)
Of course, mail going to my rcpthosts works just fine...
I am missing something in my settings, but I just can't find
what it is.
I tried using tcpserver and that worked for allowing
selective relaying, but
connections to any port from systems other than localhost
usually took 30-45
seconds between getting the socket and getting the banner
from the server.
There is no tcpserver mailing list that I could find and none
of the man pages
or online documenation told me how to fix this problem.
Please don't suggest
that I use tcpserver to resove this issue because it introduces larger
problems.
Thank you!
--
John Evans
Get free email and a permanent address at
http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
This message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any wrong transmission.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately destroy it
and kindly notify the sender by reply email.
You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or
copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient.
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of Newknow shall be understood as neither
given nor endorsed by it.
Re: an alias can never override a valid user's deliveries ???
P.S. also please remember that users/assign method is not suitable for us since - for many reasons (our auto-hosting software) - we have to use system accounts at: http://www.pgregg.com/projects/qmail/single-uid-howto.php "If you want to use system accounts do not read this document - it may lead you in the wrong direction." so we need one simple thing: qmail should respect what is in global aliases.cdb file used by fastforward means if there is configured alias (or catch-all) in one domain it should sent messages to user pointed to this alias - not to real user if this can't be done, then handling aliases in fastforward/qmail duo are worse than in Zmailer... (brrr..) P.S. Keith, Thanks, but I was moved to qmail from Zmailer with large aliases list, (it worked on Zmailer without any problem) and this is the reason why now I'm using this shortcut (aliases - aliases.cdb and fastforward) instead of any "native" qmail technology so I need an advice on how to do that with this set of tools... --Adam at [16/Apr/2001Mon 00:06] You Wrote in [Re: "an alias can never override a valid user's deliveries" ???]: We alias all of our mail for our server with the domain first: (excerpt from /var/qmail/users/assign): =triton-net-ennui:virtual:1008:100:/var/qmail/popboxes/triton-net/ennui::: ... =1-800-all-cruises-com-info:virtual:1008:100:/var/qmail/popboxes/1-800-all-cruises-com/info::: (excerpt from /var/qmail/control/virtualdomains) triton.net:triton-net mail.triton.net:triton-net ... 1-800-all-cruises.com:1-800-all-cruises-com Is this not a viable option for you?
Re: /var/spool/mail/rizwan
Rizwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: how do i configure qmail to deliver mail to /var/spool/mail/username_file. Read the qmail documentation. Dan has instructions for /var/spool/mail delivery. Thats where kmail looks for the mail box. So configure kmail to look somewhere else (like $HOME/Maildir/) for its new mail. Charles -- --- Charles Cazabon[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. ---
Re: /var/spool/mail/rizwan
From: Charles Cazabon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rizwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: how do i configure qmail to deliver mail to /var/spool/mail/username_file. Read the qmail documentation. Dan has instructions for /var/spool/mail delivery. Specifically, in the source, look at the file INSTALL.vsm.
scan4virus without qmail-smtpd
Is it possible to get scan4virus to scan email that does not pass through qmail-smtpd? I am trying to get email sent through IMP (www.horde.org) Webmail to be scanned. I have tried setting the Environment Variable in Apache but that didn't work. I am now trying to get it to work through simple shell scripts and am not having any luck there either. Here is what I am trying to do: #!/bin/sh QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl; export QMAILQUEUE /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject [EMAIL PROTECTED] EOF To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] virus (SNIPED) I know the scanner will find the virus I am sending when sent through Outlook/Netscape. Should this be possible? Is qmail-inject erasing QMAILQUEUE? Any ideas? Thanks all. John McCoy, Jr Central Systems Administrator Mills College, Oakland, CA 510-430-3321 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
delivery to local postmaster could not happen
Hi, Maillog says: Apr 16 17:58:13 void qmail: 987436693.474503 starting delivery 57: msg 218656 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apr 16 17:58:13 void qmail: 987436693.474811 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20 Apr 16 17:58:13 void qmail: 987436693.498477 delivery 57: deferral: Unable_to_chdir_to_maildir._(#4.2.1)/ Apr 16 17:58:13 void qmail: 987436693.498708 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20 Ok I see that mails can not be delivered to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (yy.xxx.lu is the server name), because there is no Maildir.. But where does qmail look for the maildir? The filesystem path? So I can create it. Here are my account in relation width mail. pop:*:68:6:Post Office Owner:/nonexistent:/sbin/nologin alias:*:1002:1001:User :/var/qmail/alias:/nonexistent qmaild:*:1003:1001:User :/var/qmail:/nonexistent qmaill:*:1004:1001:User :/var/qmail:/nonexistent qmailp:*:1005:1001:User :/var/qmail:/nonexistent qmailq:*:1006:1002:User :/var/qmail:/nonexistent qmailr:*:1007:1002:User :/var/qmail:/nonexistent qmails:*:1008:1002:User :/var/qmail:/nonexistent vpopmail:*:1009:1003:User :/var/vpopmail:/bin/sh Thanks in advance
Re: delivery to local postmaster could not happen
Patric de Waha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok I see that mails can not be delivered to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (yy.xxx.lu is the server name), because there is no Maildir.. Or for another reason. pop:*:68:6:Post Office Owner:/nonexistent:/sbin/nologin From the manpage for qmail-getpw: qmail-getpw considers an account in /etc/passwd to be a user if (1) the account has a nonzero uid, (2) the account's home directory exists (and is visible to qmail- getpw), and (3) the account owns its home directory. I'd guess that /nonexistent doesn't exist. Charles -- --- Charles Cazabon[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. ---
2 Qmail servers...
Hi, Can i run 2 Qmail server on the same server with different port ? If yes how ? Thanks = How i can add X-Complaint-to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] in headers of all output message ? Nicolas DEFFAYET, NDSoftware http://www.ndsoftware.net - [EMAIL PROTECTED] France: Tel +33 671887502 --- Note: All HTML email sent to me can be deleted for security reasons.
Relay test on abuse.net
My server failed in Relay Test 6 in www.abuse.net. The result is: Relay test 6 RSET 250 flushed MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 250 ok RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 250 ok Relay test result Hmmn, at first glance, host appeared to accept a message for relay. THIS MAY OR MAY NOT MEAN THAT IT'S AN OPEN RELAY. Can somebody help me ? TIA Jairo
Re: Relay test on abuse.net
Jairo Marciano Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My server failed in Relay Test 6 in www.abuse.net. No, it didn't. This comes up all the time; read the bloody mailing list archives. Charles -- --- Charles Cazabon[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. ---
RE: Relay test on abuse.net
Was the message relayed? My guess, NO. If it wasn't delivered its not a problem. What part of "THIS MAY OR MAY NOT MEAN THAT IT'S AN OPEN RELAY." doesn't make sense? -Original Message- From: Jairo Marciano Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 12:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Relay test on abuse.net My server failed in Relay Test 6 in www.abuse.net. The result is: Relay test 6 RSET 250 flushed MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 250 ok RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 250 ok Relay test result Hmmn, at first glance, host appeared to accept a message for relay. THIS MAY OR MAY NOT MEAN THAT IT'S AN OPEN RELAY. Can somebody help me ? TIA Jairo
Re: Relay test on abuse.net
Relay test 6 RSET 250 flushed MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 250 ok RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 250 ok Relay test result Hmmn, at first glance, host appeared to accept a message for relay. THIS MAY OR MAY NOT MEAN THAT IT'S AN OPEN RELAY. Jairo, No, your qmail is OK, unless you've enabled percenthacks (if you're not sure, then you haven't, it's disabled by default). Percenthacks control outbound relaying eg. user@host%relay_host I think it's something to do with the way qmail first accepts the message, the test on abuse.net thinks that qmail is willing to send the message. Regards John
Re: Relay test on abuse.net
Thanks very much !!! Jairo - Original Message - From: "John P" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Jairo Marciano Silva" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 1:54 PM Subject: Re: Relay test on abuse.net Relay test 6 RSET 250 flushed MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 250 ok RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 250 ok Relay test result Hmmn, at first glance, host appeared to accept a message for relay. THIS MAY OR MAY NOT MEAN THAT IT'S AN OPEN RELAY. Jairo, No, your qmail is OK, unless you've enabled percenthacks (if you're not sure, then you haven't, it's disabled by default). Percenthacks control outbound relaying eg. user@host%relay_host I think it's something to do with the way qmail first accepts the message, the test on abuse.net thinks that qmail is willing to send the message. Regards John
Re: Relay test on abuse.net
Take a look at this -- be sure to look at the two "Follow-Ups" to the mesage: http://lists.omnipotent.net/qmail/200010/msg00817.html From: "Jairo Marciano Silva" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 13:37:11 -0300 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Relay test on abuse.net My server failed in Relay Test 6 in www.abuse.net. The result is: Relay test 6 RSET 250 flushed MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 250 ok RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 250 ok Relay test result Hmmn, at first glance, host appeared to accept a message for relay. THIS MAY OR MAY NOT MEAN THAT IT'S AN OPEN RELAY. Can somebody help me ? TIA Jairo
RE: delivery to local postmaster could not happen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Patric, On Saturday, April 16, 2005 18:10, Patric de Waha [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: Hi, Maillog says: Apr 16 17:58:13 void qmail: 987436693.474503 starting delivery 57: msg 218656 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apr 16 17:58:13 void qmail: 987436693.474811 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20 Apr 16 17:58:13 void qmail: 987436693.498477 delivery 57: deferral: Unable_to_chdir_to_maildir._(#4.2.1)/ Apr 16 17:58:13 void qmail: 987436693.498708 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20 Ok I see that mails can not be delivered to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (yy.xxx.lu is the server name), because there is no Maildir.. But where does qmail look for the maildir? The filesystem path? So I can create it. Here are my account in relation width mail. pop:*:68:6:Post Office Owner:/nonexistent:/sbin/nologin alias:*:1002:1001:User :/var/qmail/alias:/nonexistent what does the file /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-postmaster contain if it contains nothing the Maildir should be created under the /var/qmail/alias/ directory and have the alias ownership. qmaild:*:1003:1001:User :/var/qmail:/nonexistent qmaill:*:1004:1001:User :/var/qmail:/nonexistent qmailp:*:1005:1001:User :/var/qmail:/nonexistent qmailq:*:1006:1002:User :/var/qmail:/nonexistent qmailr:*:1007:1002:User :/var/qmail:/nonexistent qmails:*:1008:1002:User :/var/qmail:/nonexistent vpopmail:*:1009:1003:User :/var/vpopmail:/bin/sh Thanks in advance -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.3 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com iQA/AwUBOtsYNP4IaGw3x6aJEQKn5ACfS8y8HTnCvQL967NZcFdMRgLa8OIAnjtO yIfOQshCjmnMTym6IQTzVJ86 =VA6x -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Adding disclaimer to all Internet-bound emails?
Hi, I checked on the web and the archives of this list, but no luck. Can you confirm that qmail is unable to add a disclaimer to any outgoing e-mail? Thx FF.
RE: Adding disclaimer to all Internet-bound emails?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, April 16, 2001 19:18, Frederic Faure [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: Hi, I checked on the web and the archives of this list, but no luck. Can you confirm that qmail is unable to add a disclaimer to any outgoing e-mail? With qmail-qfilter by Bruce Guenter you should be able to do it. check here http://em.ca/~bruceg/qmail-qfilter/ Thx FF. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.3 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com iQA/AwUBOtskP/4IaGw3x6aJEQI7JwCeJTiF1D589WoLRHfOVKWWfYmX3C4AnRQN 5ISNWtCmB+6NIrbcnEZ+aDu7 =mCpU -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: clustering
I know of a feature in SGI's File System that launches an event when something including data changes happen to a file. This might be a generic Journalling FS feature. In which case installing a JFS might be one way. However I am not sure of the current state of JFS on Linux. I know there has been many talks including SGI contributions, but don't know of any current GA version. Maybe others can educate me as well. Benjamin Lee wrote: Slightly off topic... I was wondering if anyone has used something like 'watch' or 'stat' (or somthing else?) to detect the modification (change) of a file or directory, and then trigger an rsync? Of course, I could settle with a crond rsync every minute or so, I guess! I do this at the moment, was just thinking about an alternative... On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 05:23:22PM +0200, Karsten W. Rohrbach wrote: Peter van Dijk([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.04.13 10:23:26 +: I have a central box that generates all configfiles and puts them in a directory called /conf/mail on a NetApp fileserver, from which all qmail boxes copy their configuration periodically. Make sure you copy stuff to tmpfiles and then move 'm (also when generating files to go into /conf/mail). Especially over NFS, doing it any different is guaranteed trouble. in several projects i used rsync[1] over ssh (openssh[2]) for distributing configuration between machines (push updates). rsync does a great job, supporting incremental/differential updates and moving the files in place after they have been transmitted and verified. happy easter /k links: [1] http://rsync.samba.org/ [2] http://www.openssh.com/ -- Microsoft isn't the answer. Microsoft is the question, and the answer is no. KR433/KR11-RIPE -- http://www.webmonster.de -- ftp://ftp.webmonster.de -- === Medi Montaseri, [EMAIL PROTECTED], 408-450-7114 Prepass Inc, IT/Operations, Software Eng. ===
Re: 2 Qmail servers...
NDSoftware : Hi, Can i run 2 Qmail server on the same server with different port ? If yes how ? Thanks You have to distinguish between the various components of qmail, for our purposes the programs like qmail-send. qmail-inject etc. that maintain the queue and the part that listens for incoming mail on (normally) port 25 which is qmail-smtpd. Both can be installed/run twice by simply compiling two separate instances of qmail. You do this by setting the pathname in the configuration file conf-qmail in the source distribution to two separate values, say first to "/var/qmail1", compile and install and then to "/var/qmail2", compile and install. Everything else remains unchanged to a normal install except that the two instances of qmail-smtpd need to listen to different ports, for instance 25 and 26. If you have qmail-smtpd controlled by tcpserver you just have to set the appropriate port number on the command line. For inetd you have to have two entries in /etc/inetd.conf for the two port numbers. Note that you also have to get a connecting mailserver to attach to the nonstandard port, in my example 26. That kind of setup will result in two parallel instances of qmail running on the same machine that do not know anything about each other. If you simply want two instances of the smtp daemon running that dump incoming mail into the same queue you only need one instance of qmail compiled. Simply have qmail-smtpd (via tcpserver or inetd) listen on two separate ports as described above. NB: What are you trying to achieve with this? Maybe there is a more straightforward method. regards, -- Joerg Lenneis email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: an alias can never override a valid user's deliveries ???
Adam Andrzej Jaworski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: also please remember that users/assign method is not suitable for us since - for many reasons (our auto-hosting software) - we have to use system accounts qmail-users doesn't preclude the use of system accounts, it just provides a more general aliasing mechanism that preempts system accounts. so we need one simple thing: qmail should respect what is in global aliases.cdb file used by fastforward means if there is configured alias (or catch-all) in one domain it should sent messages to user pointed to this alias - not to real user if this can't be done, then handling aliases in fastforward/qmail duo are worse than in Zmailer... (brrr..) You could always modify the source--qmail-lspawn.c, most likely. -Dave
RE: 2 Qmail servers...
OK Thanks you very much. I try this now. Nicolas DEFFAYET, NDSoftware http://www.ndsoftware.net - [EMAIL PROTECTED] France: Tel +33 671887502 --- Note: All HTML email sent to me can be deleted for security reasons. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 9:01 PM To: NDSoftware Cc: Mailing-List Qmail Subject: Re: 2 Qmail servers... NDSoftware : Hi, Can i run 2 Qmail server on the same server with different port ? If yes how ? Thanks You have to distinguish between the various components of qmail, for our purposes the programs like qmail-send. qmail-inject etc. that maintain the queue and the part that listens for incoming mail on (normally) port 25 which is qmail-smtpd. Both can be installed/run twice by simply compiling two separate instances of qmail. You do this by setting the pathname in the configuration file conf-qmail in the source distribution to two separate values, say first to "/var/qmail1", compile and install and then to "/var/qmail2", compile and install. Everything else remains unchanged to a normal install except that the two instances of qmail-smtpd need to listen to different ports, for instance 25 and 26. If you have qmail-smtpd controlled by tcpserver you just have to set the appropriate port number on the command line. For inetd you have to have two entries in /etc/inetd.conf for the two port numbers. Note that you also have to get a connecting mailserver to attach to the nonstandard port, in my example 26. That kind of setup will result in two parallel instances of qmail running on the same machine that do not know anything about each other. If you simply want two instances of the smtp daemon running that dump incoming mail into the same queue you only need one instance of qmail compiled. Simply have qmail-smtpd (via tcpserver or inetd) listen on two separate ports as described above. NB: What are you trying to achieve with this? Maybe there is a more straightforward method. regards, -- Joerg Lenneis email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
qmail-popup
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, A question about qmail-popup. Here is a part of the qmail-popup manual. qmail-popup expects descriptor 0 to read from the network and descriptor 1 to write to the network. It reads a username and password from descriptor 0 in POP's USER-PASS style or APOP style. It invokes subprogram, with the same descriptors 0 and 1; descriptor 2 writing to the network; and descriptor 3 reading the username, What use is it to give descriptor 2 as writing to the network i'v checked the source for qmail-pop3d and did not find anything that wrote to descriptor 2. Are there any programs out there that do use it? I know descriptor 2 is stderr so it could be that when an error msg is send to stderr it is send to the network, but how can you do logging in this case. My patch for pop3d loggin disables this feature and send the error msgs from qmail-pop3d to stdout(1) and stderr(2) so that the error is send to the network and also to any logging program that is used. Any comments on this. Willy De la Court -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.3 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com iQA/AwUBOts5Ov4IaGw3x6aJEQLhmgCeIjOtxfd86vlI0QMnyDpH0yU7eqUAoKNB YTTlokvu4e/OsLpkAoJdyCIe =Tng7 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Qmail internal domain routing?
Iain Morrison wrote: I was thinking that by assigning sub domains to the e.g. office1.domain.com etc... This would enable this to happen via DNS MX records. I would propose to have one system as the server that sends receives all mail from the internet acting as a gateway for our internal network, scanning for viruses using qmail-scanner and mapping email for the few real e-mail address to their internal ones. But I am not sure how to limit only certain users to send mail outside whilst allowing unlimited e-mail internally i.e. across our WAN! Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Iain Morrison How about settting tcpserver to set the RELAYLCLIENT="" variable only for IP addresses of the users that need to relay out to the net and having it not set that variable for those that don't? -- Keith Network Engineer Triton Technologies, Inc.
RE: Relay test on abuse.net
On Mon, 16 Apr 2001, Tim Hunter wrote: Was the message relayed? My guess, NO. If it wasn't delivered its not a problem. What part of "THIS MAY OR MAY NOT MEAN THAT IT'S AN OPEN RELAY." doesn't make sense? Ok, so I'm gonna take a ride in the subject and ask about my relay test on mailabuse.rg... :Relay test: #Test 9 mail from: spamtest@ 250 ok rcpt to: nobody%mail-abuse.org@[200.207.126.46] 250 ok QUIT 221 nicholas.cybershark.net Tested host banner: 220 nicholas.cybershark.net ESMTP System appeared to accept 1 relay attempts Connection closed by foreign host. So, this means I am vunelrable to SPAM? Thank you for you attention and patience! regards, daniduc Daniel Lobato Duclos - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.cybershark.net --- Money Isn't Our God - Integrity Will Free Our Soul (Sepultura - CutThroat)
Re: Relay test on abuse.net
No, unless you have enabled the percenthack '%' (see http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html#percenthack for details) you are not a relay. Please stop with the questions unless you actually check for answers first. Daniel Duclos writes: On Mon, 16 Apr 2001, Tim Hunter wrote: Was the message relayed? My guess, NO. If it wasn't delivered its not a problem. What part of "THIS MAY OR MAY NOT MEAN THAT IT'S AN OPEN RELAY." doesn't make sense? Ok, so I'm gonna take a ride in the subject and ask about my relay test on mailabuse.rg... :Relay test: #Test 9 mail from: spamtest@ 250 ok rcpt to: nobody%mail-abuse.org@[200.207.126.46] 250 ok QUIT 221 nicholas.cybershark.net Tested host banner: 220 nicholas.cybershark.net ESMTP System appeared to accept 1 relay attempts Connection closed by foreign host. So, this means I am vunelrable to SPAM? Thank you for you attention and patience! regards, daniduc Daniel Lobato Duclos - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.cybershark.net --- Money Isn't Our God - Integrity Will Free Our Soul (Sepultura - CutThroat)
[Announce] oMail-webmail 0.96.1 released!
Hola! A new version of oMail-webmail is now available! This is version 0.96.1, with lots of fixes and major improvements : Major changes since last pre-release: * integrated search engine in each mail folder * automatic email-addresses grabbing by reading existing messages * several new configuration flags * last login display * automatic logfile and trash deletion * and many small fixes as usuall :) You will find more infos about this GPL-licensed software, as well as an online demo of latest version under http://webmail.omnis.ch/omail.pl?action=about * Download: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/omail/omail-webmail-0.96.1.tar.gz * Other URL's: (cvs, releases, etc) http://freshmeat.net/projects/omail-webmail/ * If you are interested to help, fell free to get the files from the anonymous CVS, and you are welcome on the devel mailing list. * There are currently 2 mailing lists : - omail-news : read-only announce mailing list (for new release announces) http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/omail-news - omail-devel : public mailing list for devel support. http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/omail-devel * Detailed Changelog since last release: 16.apr.01 - Version 0.96 - om [EMAIL PROTECTED] * fixed a bug with perl 5.6 and require * added 2 more "from" fields in the settings (total=5) - requested by JYD * added an automatic "trash-empty" freature, and a flag to the settings screen * added INSTALL.vpopmail documentation [hm] * added "save_outgoing_mail" flag to the settings * composemail textarea is bigger * added "search" feature! will only look at the first 80 lines of each mail if searchstring is not found in the headers : should limit the performance hog when pooling big mailboxes. Currently using "index()" as search engine: comments welcome (more info in the getheaders code) * added error messages for fatal errors * limited size from user logfile to 20kB * updated lang files (waiting for translations...) * save and display last login information * added possibility to display a welcome message on login (for server info, etc.) * added "grabaddr" feature : it allows you to grab all email addresses from existing messages and to insert them in the addressbook with one click. * updated some docs * fixed the charset issue (not sending with 7bit anymore: default=iso-8859-1 * fixed download link and updated about page * ready for 0.96.1 release 11.mar.01 - Version 0.95pre3 - om [EMAIL PROTECTED] * added russian [kam] Regards, and don't eat too much chocolate :-) Olivier -- _ Olivier Mueller - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - PGPkeyID: 0E84D2EA - Switzerland qmail projects: http://omail.omnis.ch - http://webmail.omnis.ch PGP signature
IP spoofed spam - off topic
hello, sorry for the off topic post. real quick; had a server x.x.x.110 running sendmail. getting complaints of spam originating from that box. removed IP, still getting complaints. turned system off, still getting complaints. Can an IP be spoofed so totally in mail headers? headers: Received: from mailserv01.dartgc.com ([207.34.255.70]) by southwind.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA21910 for x; Sun, 15 Apr 2001 22:10:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 22:10:26 -0700 (PDT) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ngqjz.msn.com ([x.x.x.110]) by mailserv01.dartgc.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id H5VRZ1Y1; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 01:09:20 -0400 Again, sorry for the off topic post, and thanks. * Mick Dobra Systems Administrator MTCO Communications 1-800-859-6826 *
Re: IP spoofed spam - off topic
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 04:00:32PM -0500, mick wrote: hello, sorry for the off topic post. real quick; had a server x.x.x.110 running sendmail. getting complaints of spam originating from that box. removed IP, still getting complaints. turned system off, still getting complaints. Can an IP be spoofed so totally in mail headers? headers: Received: from mailserv01.dartgc.com ([207.34.255.70]) by southwind.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA21910 for x; Sun, 15 Apr 2001 22:10:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 22:10:26 -0700 (PDT) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ngqjz.msn.com ([x.x.x.110]) by mailserv01.dartgc.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id H5VRZ1Y1; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 01:09:20 -0400 How is anyone supposed to give you a sure answer if you munge/hide relevant information?
Re: IP spoofed spam - off topic
The system is off, and has had that ip removed. It no longer belongs to a functioning system. 207.179.205.110 if it helps. On Mon, 16 Apr 2001, Alex Pennace wrote: On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 04:00:32PM -0500, mick wrote: hello, sorry for the off topic post. real quick; had a server x.x.x.110 running sendmail. getting complaints of spam originating from that box. removed IP, still getting complaints. turned system off, still getting complaints. Can an IP be spoofed so totally in mail headers? headers: Received: from mailserv01.dartgc.com ([207.34.255.70]) by southwind.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA21910 for x; Sun, 15 Apr 2001 22:10:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 22:10:26 -0700 (PDT) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ngqjz.msn.com ([x.x.x.110]) by mailserv01.dartgc.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id H5VRZ1Y1; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 01:09:20 -0400 How is anyone supposed to give you a sure answer if you munge/hide relevant information? * Mick Dobra Systems Administrator MTCO Communications 1-800-859-6826 *
Re: IP spoofed spam - off topic
On Mon, 16 Apr 2001, Alex Pennace wrote: On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 04:00:32PM -0500, mick wrote: hello, sorry for the off topic post. real quick; had a server x.x.x.110 running sendmail. getting complaints of spam originating from that box. removed IP, still getting complaints. turned system off, still getting complaints. Can an IP be spoofed so totally in mail headers? headers: Received: from mailserv01.dartgc.com ([207.34.255.70]) by southwind.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA21910 for x; Sun, 15 Apr 2001 22:10:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 22:10:26 -0700 (PDT) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ngqjz.msn.com ([x.x.x.110]) by mailserv01.dartgc.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id H5VRZ1Y1; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 01:09:20 -0400 How is anyone supposed to give you a sure answer if you munge/hide relevant information? As an additional note: Looks like every system receiving the spam are Exchange servers. Is someone exploiting an exchange fault? * Mick Dobra Systems Administrator MTCO Communications 1-800-859-6826 *
Re: IP spoofed spam - off topic
mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can an IP be spoofed so totally in mail headers? Short answer: yes. Spammers are getting better at spoofing mail headers, as misguided "spam protection" features in MTAs force them to. Long answer: can't analyze the situation properly when you munge header information. You might try running the headers through SpamCop or SamSpade to see if they can detect the header forgery. Charles -- --- Charles Cazabon[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. ---
Re: IP spoofed spam - off topic
On Mon, 16 Apr 2001, Charles Cazabon wrote: mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can an IP be spoofed so totally in mail headers? Short answer: yes. Spammers are getting better at spoofing mail headers, as misguided "spam protection" features in MTAs force them to. Long answer: can't analyze the situation properly when you munge header information. You might try running the headers through SpamCop or SamSpade to see if they can detect the header forgery. munge the headers? that was a direct copy from the spamcop message! I changed the ip address because that ip (and the server it used to be on) is no longer operational. but thats it. 207.179.205.110 was the address. Charles * Mick Dobra Systems Administrator MTCO Communications 1-800-859-6826 *
Re: IP spoofed spam - off topic
From: mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 16:00:54 -0500 (CDT) hello, sorry for the off topic post. real quick; had a server x.x.x.110 running sendmail. getting complaints of spam originating from that box. removed IP, still getting complaints. turned system off, still getting complaints. Can an IP be spoofed so totally in mail headers? headers: Received: from mailserv01.dartgc.com ([207.34.255.70]) by southwind.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA21910 for x; Sun, 15 Apr 2001 22:10:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 22:10:26 -0700 (PDT) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ngqjz.msn.com ([x.x.x.110]) by mailserv01.dartgc.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id H5VRZ1Y1; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 01:09:20 -0400 Again, sorry for the off topic post, and thanks. Who controls 207.34.255.70 and is it really mailserv01.dartgc.com? Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ virCIO http://www.virCIO.Com 4314 Avenue C Austin, TX 78751-3709 +1 512 374 0500 My email address is an experiment in SPAM elimination. For an explanation of what we're doing, see http://www.DeepEddy.Com/tms.html Nobody ever got fired for buying Microsoft, but they could get fired for relying on Microsoft. PGP signature
Re: clustering
Medi Montaseri wrote: I know of a feature in SGI's File System that launches an event when something including data changes happen to a file. This might be a generic Journalling FS feature. In which case installing a JFS might be one way. However I am not sure of the current state of JFS on Linux. I know there has been many talks including SGI contributions, but don't know of any current GA version. Maybe others can educate me as well. Or you could use FreeBSD 4.x with kqueue support. With an kernel queue you can select() on any kernel event, including filesystems, files and directories. See the man page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=kqueueapropos=0sektion=0manpath=FreeBSD+4.2-RELEASEformat=html and see 'tail' for an programming example: http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/usr.bin/tail/ -- Andre Benjamin Lee wrote: Slightly off topic... I was wondering if anyone has used something like 'watch' or 'stat' (or somthing else?) to detect the modification (change) of a file or directory, and then trigger an rsync? Of course, I could settle with a crond rsync every minute or so, I guess! I do this at the moment, was just thinking about an alternative... On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 05:23:22PM +0200, Karsten W. Rohrbach wrote: Peter van Dijk([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.04.13 10:23:26 +: I have a central box that generates all configfiles and puts them in a directory called /conf/mail on a NetApp fileserver, from which all qmail boxes copy their configuration periodically. Make sure you copy stuff to tmpfiles and then move 'm (also when generating files to go into /conf/mail). Especially over NFS, doing it any different is guaranteed trouble. in several projects i used rsync[1] over ssh (openssh[2]) for distributing configuration between machines (push updates). rsync does a great job, supporting incremental/differential updates and moving the files in place after they have been transmitted and verified. happy easter /k links: [1] http://rsync.samba.org/ [2] http://www.openssh.com/ -- Microsoft isn't the answer. Microsoft is the question, and the answer is no. KR433/KR11-RIPE -- http://www.webmonster.de -- ftp://ftp.webmonster.de -- === Medi Montaseri, [EMAIL PROTECTED], 408-450-7114 Prepass Inc, IT/Operations, Software Eng. ===
Re: an alias can never override a valid user's deliveries ???
Thanks Dave, of course, I just realized that Keith talked about just qmail-users, not in context "Single-UID based POP3 box By Paul Gregg" - I'm sorry Keith - anyway, it seems that I should start hacking around the qmail :-) I will let you know, folks, if it will be a success, since I'm not a programmer of any kind, but if this is the only way... I will :-) thanks for your support --Adam at [16/Apr/2001Mon 21:14] You Wrote in [Re: "an alias can never override a valid user's deliveries" ???]: Adam Andrzej Jaworski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: also please remember that users/assign method is not suitable for us since - for many reasons (our auto-hosting software) - we have to use system accounts qmail-users doesn't preclude the use of system accounts, it just provides a more general aliasing mechanism that preempts system accounts. so we need one simple thing: qmail should respect what is in global aliases.cdb file used by fastforward means if there is configured alias (or catch-all) in one domain it should sent messages to user pointed to this alias - not to real user if this can't be done, then handling aliases in fastforward/qmail duo are worse than in Zmailer... (brrr..) You could always modify the source--qmail-lspawn.c, most likely. -Dave
qmail-ezmlm: don't want welcome msg
Hi, I recently switched our Communigate (which was carshing a lotand required exoensive update) to qmail + ezmlm-idx. Qmail is working great so far. Ezmlm is pretty good do, even if it's a little harder to get the kind of mailing list we want here. We need announcement only list, this is one poster, and all subscriber can't send anything. I achieve that ok, using ezmlm options. However i have one more problem, we get email subscription through an external system (and have a lot to transfert), and don't want people to receive a submition confirmation/welcome message. I found the option for removing the confirmation message, however i can't find a way to get rid off the "welcome" message ? How can I do that ?? (an don't tell me that I don't want to do that :-) ) I could do that through an external system (servlet) calling qmail-sub on the local system, but would be much hapyer to just have to toggle a "no welcome message" option in ezmlm. Thank you. -- *** Thibaut Colar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Lead Java Developer Qarbon.com 84 West Santa Clara st. Suite 890, San jose. 95113 CA. http://www.qarbon.com/ T: 408 792 3800 x 227 ***
ONLY virtual domains?
Is it possible to ONLY use virtual domains? I'd like to do this for oganizational sake more than anything else (I am using vmailmgr and like to have each domain controlled under on home dir). For example, let's say I have a machine named mail.mydomain.com. The MX record for mydomain.com points to that machine. I also serve mail for anotherdomain.com and thirddomain.com. What would happen if I listed mydomain.com in "virtualdomains" along with the other two? Is it possible to leave "locals" and plusdomains" empty? Does it matter? Would that give me the desired result? Thanks, Sean _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
Re: ONLY virtual domains?
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 11:35:28PM -0400, Sean Brown wrote: Is it possible to ONLY use virtual domains? I'd like to do this for oganizational sake more than anything else (I am using vmailmgr and like to have each domain controlled under on home dir). Yes. I have an organization with about a dozen domains, all virtual, using VMailMgr. Tim
