Big - to - do patch not much useful
Hi All, I have a server installed with qmail. I have applied DNS patch and Big-to-do patch and running qmail from 3 different directories parallelly. But, I am able to send 15 mails a second only Inspite of all the above Without Big-to-do patch also qmail gave me same performance !!! But, Is there anyway or config by which I can send say 100 mails a second Thanks & Regards,Rajesh,tech solutions,[EMAIL PROTECTED],Intercept Consulting - INDIA.
Re: ^M character at the end of each line
> I've noticed a ^M character in some plain text email messages in the qmail > queue. > Why is it there The ^M is the remain of a M$ machine's CR/LF pair, not converted. > ...and how can i remove it ? For the existing messages in the queue I'd say sed or alike. For upcoming messages, you will have to find the point of misconfiguration. I could not tell you which side you should look for it (client or server). Csaba __ This message went through virus scan at Trend Ltd. which stated the message was clean of viri appeared before 2001.06.29.
^M character at the end of each line
Hi, I've noticed a ^M character in some plain text email messages in the qmail queue. Why is it there and how can i remove it ? - ronnie - This email had been checked by Asiatravelmart.com's Virus Scanner. Please email any questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MX record in DNS and Qmail
the reason why i desided to post this question is 'cause i was also have been told that i need to create file smtproutes and add my domain there.. so i just wanted to double make sure, sorry for bothering anyone on the list - Original Message - From: "Henning Brauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2001 8:45 PM Subject: Re: MX record in DNS and Qmail > On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 08:37:12PM -0400, alexus wrote: > > Hello > > > > i added another MX record for my domain where and what i should add into > > qmail in order for qmail to act as a backup? > > Put the domain(s) in question into /var/qmail/rcpthosts and nowhere else as > you could have read in the archives athousand times. > > -- > * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * > * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * > Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. > (Dennis Ritchie) >
Re: MX record in DNS and Qmail
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 08:37:12PM -0400, alexus wrote: > Hello > > i added another MX record for my domain where and what i should add into > qmail in order for qmail to act as a backup? Put the domain(s) in question into /var/qmail/rcpthosts and nowhere else as you could have read in the archives athousand times. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
MX record in DNS and Qmail
Hello i added another MX record for my domain where and what i should add into qmail in order for qmail to act as a backup? Thanks in advance
Re: OT: Solaris vs. Linux vs. FreeBSD
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 02:08:33PM -0400, Stuart Krivis wrote:
> Sun has contributed to the Open Source community. I also notice that much
> of the money being made on open source software is in the support arena.
> Isn't that what RedHat is selling these days?
Sun contributes just enough to make it *appear* as though they care about
open source, however, those of us who have recently met with Sun
sales engineers and heard the FUD they spread about Open Source software and
OS's know a different story.
As far as RedHat support, yeah, it's there. But I've yet to hear the phrase
"nobody ever got fired for buying {RedHat,Linux}" in the corporate world.
> A number of the leading lights of open source are now working for major OS
> vendors. What do you make of that?
Who, exactly, are you speaking of? I prefer not to comment on
generalizations.
> Apple is well on its way to becoming the largest volume vendor of unix. How
> will that affect things?
Let's not get ahead of ourselves.
--Adam
Re: Qmail/tcpserver woes
> morning, and expected all to be well. Soon after the reload, we began to see > our SMTP service go painfully slow, only allowing a trickle of emails to get > in. So the rcpthosts list going blank and then being rebuilt is not the Well, it may not be a real problem, it may be just slow connections using up your concurrency. In this case it should eventually sort itself out. Having said that, you don't mention whether the box is very busy nor what sort of internet connection you have. That would be useful to know. Futhermore, you don't say whether SMTP deliveries are occuring or not. Is the qmail-send log ticking over with new deliveries? While Matt might have omitted some useful information, he does however make our life a lot easier because he gives plain data and the *real* domain. This allowed me to do a couple of test connections to his server which makes things a lot clearer. Here's what happens for me: $ telnet mail1.godaddy.com 25 Trying 63.241.136.35... telnet: connect to address 63.241.136.35: Network dropped connection on reset telnet: Unable to connect to remote host Thanks Matt. That tells me a lot. Specifically that the port is being listened to - so tcpserver is running correctly, that connections are being accept - so the tcpserver listen socket hasn't reach the backlog limit, but then something fails... > I have noticed that if I do a "qmail stop" and then a "qmail start", about > 20 successful SMTP connections immediately come in, and then even though This is a worry as your tcpserver line has a concurrency of 120 as shown here. > Here is the tcpserver line I am currently using for smtp: > > 22482 ?S 0:00 /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -l > mail1.godaddy.com -P -H -R -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c 120 -u 503 -g 502 0 smtp > /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd I'd expect you to see a lot more than 20 qmail-smtpd processes running. In conjunction with the results of the telnet test I suspect a limits problem that is stopping tcpserver from forking as many processes as it wants. Do you log the tcpserver output? If so, what does it show? If not, can you start logging (I don't know whether LWQ includes this). Does your tcpserver start script use softlimit to set the process limits? If so, can you include -p130 or some such? However tcpserver is started you'll need to raise the limit on the number of children it can fork. Regards.
Re: OT: Solaris vs. Linux vs. FreeBSD
--On Saturday, June 30, 2001 08:29:37 PM -0700 Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 03:53:59PM -0400, Steve Fulton wrote: > I swear to god, I wish people on this list would stop talking out of their > asses. The reason big businesses run Solaris is the same reason they run > NT -- they like having a big company "supporting" their software. This > is an area where the MS/Sun FUD against Open Source has been effective. Sun has contributed to the Open Source community. I also notice that much of the money being made on open source software is in the support arena. Isn't that what RedHat is selling these days? A number of the leading lights of open source are now working for major OS vendors. What do you make of that? Apple is well on its way to becoming the largest volume vendor of unix. How will that affect things?
Re: OT: Re: Solaris vs. Linux vs. FreeBSD
--On Thursday, June 28, 2001 12:18:02 PM + Uwe Ohse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> just feels like a system, rather than a hodge-podge of parts. Solaris >> also has this feel to it. > > How do you manage to ignore the /usr/ucb (and xpg4 and ...) compatibility > braindamage? I just ignore it. :-) I admit that I was doing a wee bit of trolling in that there has been a lot of "Slowlaris" sentiment on this list. I do prefer Solaris on SPARC. That's my personal preference and that's that. It has worked well for me. I'm also a *BSD fan. I would choose FreeBSD first for x86 hardware. I also like NeXT/OPENSTEP and used that successfully for a long time. And I just bought a Mac so I can run OS X. It's Linux that leaves me a bit cold. It's good, and Debian is quite impressive in many ways. I even installed SGI's XFS port with RH 7.1 and it's quite competent. But Linux still feels chaotic and the documentation sucks. Just my opinion. And I did preface the subject of my reply with an OT so that it could be ignored more readily.
RE: Qmail logging problems with Lifewithqmail directions
permissions for /var/log/qmail [root@mail qmail]# ll total 8 drwxrwxr-x2 qmaill root 4096 Jun 29 15:44 pop3d/ drwxrwxr-x2 qmaill root 4096 Jun 16 15:37 smtpd/ Permissions for /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/ [root@mail qmail-smtpd]# ll total 12 drwxrwxr-x2 root root 4096 Jun 16 15:36 log/ -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 317 Jun 16 15:28 run* drwx--2 root root 4096 Jul 1 09:32 supervise/ Permissions for /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d/ [root@mail qmail-smtpd]# ll ../qmail-pop3d/ total 12 drwxrwxr-x3 root root 4096 Jun 16 18:15 log/ -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 219 Jun 16 18:07 run* drwx--2 root root 4096 Jul 1 09:32 supervise/ Permissions for /var/qmail/supervise [root@mail qmail-smtpd]# ll ../ total 12 drwxrwxr-t4 root root 4096 Jun 16 17:56 qmail-pop3d/ drwxrwxr-x4 root root 4096 Jun 16 16:10 qmail-send/ drwxrwxr-x4 root root 4096 Jun 16 17:46 qmail-smtpd/ the file that runs the logging for qmail-smtpd #!/bin/sh exec /usr/local/bin/setuidgid qmaill /usr/local/bin/multilog t \ /var/log/qmail/smtpd *** The file that runs the logging for the qmail-pop3d #!/bin/sh exec /usr/local/bin/setuidgid qmaill /usr/local/bin/multilog t \ /var/log/qmail/pop3d *** ps -aux USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND root 1 0.0 1.4 1064 468 ?SJun30 0:04 init [3 root 2 0.0 0.0 00 ?SW Jun30 0:00 [kflushd] root 3 0.0 0.0 00 ?SW Jun30 0:00 [kupdate] root 4 0.0 0.0 00 ?SW Jun30 0:00 [kswapd] root 5 0.0 0.0 00 ?SW< Jun30 0:00 [mdrecoveryd] root 246 0.0 1.1 1048 388 ?SJun30 0:00 /sbin/dhcpcd eth0 root 293 0.0 1.8 1168 588 ?SJun30 0:00 syslogd -m 0 root 303 0.0 2.4 1448 796 ?SJun30 0:00 klogd -k /boot/System.map-2.2.17-21mdksecure root 316 0.0 1.9 1280 628 ?SJun30 0:00 crond root 329 0.0 1.5 1100 516 ?SJun30 0:00 inetd root 336 0.0 3.7 2336 1200 ?SJun30 0:01 sshd xfs395 0.0 8.9 3964 2904 ?SJun30 0:00 xfs -port -1 -daemon root 411 0.0 4.8 4548 1564 ?SJun30 0:00 /usr/sbin/cupsd root 422 0.0 1.2 1032 400 tty1 SJun30 0:00 /sbin/mingetty tty1 root 423 0.0 1.2 1032 400 tty2 SJun30 0:00 /sbin/mingetty tty2 root 424 0.0 1.2 1032 400 tty3 SJun30 0:00 /sbin/mingetty tty3 root 425 0.0 1.2 1032 400 tty4 SJun30 0:00 /sbin/mingetty tty4 root 426 0.0 1.2 1032 400 tty5 SJun30 0:00 /sbin/mingetty tty5 root 427 0.0 1.2 1032 400 tty6 SJun30 0:00 /sbin/mingetty tty6 root 429 0.0 1.0 1064 328 ?SJun30 0:00 svscan /service root 432 0.0 0.9 1028 296 ?SJun30 0:00 supervise qmail-send root 433 0.0 0.9 1028 296 ?SJun30 0:00 supervise qmail-smtpd root 434 0.0 0.9 1028 296 ?SJun30 0:00 supervise qmail-pop3d root 435 0.0 0.9 1028 296 ?SJun30 0:00 supervise log qmails 436 0.0 1.1 1084 372 ?SJun30 0:00 qmail-send qmaild 437 0.0 1.4 1100 464 ?SJun30 0:00 /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -R -l 0 -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c 20 -u 503 root 438 0.0 0.9 1056 312 ?SJun30 0:00 /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -R -H -l 0 0 110 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop qmaill 442 0.0 0.9 1040 292 ?SJun30 0:00 /usr/local/bin/multilog t /var/log/qmail/pop3d root 446 0.0 0.9 1040 312 ?SJun30 0:00 qmail-lspawn ./Maildir/ qmailr 447 0.0 0.9 1040 304 ?SJun30 0:00 qmail-rspawn qmailq 448 0.0 0.9 1032 320 ?SJun30 0:00 qmail-clean root 883 0.0 3.9 3644 1292 ?SJun30 0:00 /usr/local/samba/bin/smbd -D root 896 0.0 3.9 2892 1284 ?SJun30 0:00 /usr/local/samba/bin/nmbd -D root 920 0.0 5.9 4020 1936 ?SJun30 0:01 /usr/local/samba/bin/smbd -D root 7548 0.0 5.5 2996 1800 ?S09:40 0:00 sshd gary 7549 0.0 4.2 2256 1380 pts/0S09:40 0:00 -bash root 7563 0.0 2.8 1920 924 pts/0S09:40 0:00 su root 7564 0.0 4.4 2300 1432 pts/0S09:40 0:00
Qmail/tcpserver woes
Greetings all, I've come across a situation that has me a bit confused and with a system that is effectively down at the moment. Here is what has occurred thus far: I've had a LWQ setup running for about 4 months now without issue. Over this time, I've accumulated 22k email boxes on 8k domains. Last week, I made a mistake that should've been a temporary issue that has ballooned into a serious situation. The rcpthosts file was deleted, which, of course, made the box start to reject email. I rebuilt the rcpthosts list the next morning, and expected all to be well. Soon after the reload, we began to see our SMTP service go painfully slow, only allowing a trickle of emails to get in. So the rcpthosts list going blank and then being rebuilt is not the problem, but I suspect that due to unrelated misconfiguration, the box was unprepared to handle the backlog of email due to the 10 hours of downtime(or it was just coincidence). I have noticed that if I do a "qmail stop" and then a "qmail start", about 20 successful SMTP connections immediately come in, and then even though qmail is still running, no more connections can get thru. If I leave it be, then they will very slowly come in over time. When looking at a "netstat" I see the following: [...several more pop3 connections...] tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:pop3 66.74.215.231:4542 TIME_WAIT tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:pop3 66.74.215.231:4542 TIME_WAIT tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:pop3 24.167.206.98:1240 TIME_WAIT tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:pop3 65.4.131.26:1247 TIME_WAIT tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:pop3 208.191.34.40:3539 TIME_WAIT tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:pop3 65.4.131.26:1246 TIME_WAIT tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:pop3 65.4.131.26:1245 TIME_WAIT tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:pop3 65.11.146.164:1121 TIME_WAIT tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:pop3 65.4.131.26:1246 TIME_WAIT tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:pop3 65.4.131.26:1245 TIME_WAIT tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:pop3 65.11.146.164:1121 TIME_WAIT tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:pop3 c327691-a.grnsbrg1:1071 TIME_WAIT tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:pop3 65.11.146.164:1118 TIME_WAIT tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:pop3 adsl-80-40-124.mia:4278 TIME_WAIT tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:pop3 65.24.43.27:2869 TIME_WAIT tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:pop3 65.24.43.27:2869 TIME_WAIT tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:pop3 64.68.236.161:3033 TIME_WAIT tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:pop3 208.191.34.40:3536 TIME_WAIT tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:pop3 ool-18b88b07.dyn.o:1951 ESTABLISHED tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:pop3 ool-18b88b07.dyn.o:1948 ESTABLISHED tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:smtp 208.162.63.130:2439 ESTABLISHED tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:smtp 64.211.240.238:37129 ESTABLISHED tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:smtp 64.211.240.238:37129 ESTABLISHED tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:smtp 208.50.170.31:4152 ESTABLISHED tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:smtp 192.147.236.1:4795 ESTABLISHED tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:smtp 64.211.240.238:37118 ESTABLISHED tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:smtp 64.211.240.238:37106 ESTABLISHED tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:smtp 208.50.153.24:54923 ESTABLISHED tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:smtp 206.64.128.6:40610 ESTABLISHED tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:smtp 206.64.128.6:40610 ESTABLISHED tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:smtp 139.76.67.20:42768 ESTABLISHED tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:smtp 64.4.9.55:3234 ESTABLISHED tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:smtp 207.69.200.157:8125 ESTABLISHED tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:smtp 205.184.38.2:44352 ESTABLISHED tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:smtp 207.217.120.14:53273 ESTABLISHED tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:smtp 210.118.246.250:2886 ESTABLISHED tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:smtp 64.211.240.232:13211 ESTABLISHED tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:smtp 209.208.202.178:3833 ESTABLISHED tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:smtp 208.50.144.69:5865 ESTABLISHED tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:smtp 148.233.27.132:4087 ESTABLISHED tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:smtp 207.150.192.30:1066 ESTABLISHED tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:smtp 208.184.37.231:3667 SYN_RECV tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:smtp 65.10.73.142:36399 SYN_RECV tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:smtp 148.233.27.132:4087 ESTABLISHED tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:smtp 207.150.192.30:1066 ESTABLISHED tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:smtp 208.48.26.72:8948 SYN_RECV tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:smtp 205.150.6.55:3250 SYN_RECV tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:smtp mail1.stofanet.dk:1521 SYN_RECV tcp0 0 mail1.godaddy.com:smtp 216.33.156.140:63931SYN_RECV tcp0 0 mail1.
Re: Qmail configration
On Sun, 1 Jul 2001, Leonardo Quirini wrote: >Hi everyone, i have a question: on my laptop i've installed qmail, and i >want to configure it for this scenario: i can use a ppp connection (at >home) and a ethernet connection (at the university). The mail servers >are obiovously different... I want qmail to distinguish when sending >mail between the two connections on the fly (without scripts to be run >at command line if possible), and use the correct smtp server. I've find >some docs for the two single case, but nothing for the situation over. >How can i do ? :) If you're using DHCP, simply make the dhcp client change the value in smtproutes according to which address it obtains. -- Thorkild
Qmail configration
Hi everyone, i have a question: on my laptop i've installed qmail, and i want to configure it for this scenario: i can use a ppp connection (at home) and a ethernet connection (at the university). The mail servers are obiovously different... I want qmail to distinguish when sending mail between the two connections on the fly (without scripts to be run at command line if possible), and use the correct smtp server. I've find some docs for the two single case, but nothing for the situation over. How can i do ? :) TIA -- Leonardo Quirini - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: courier-imapd, folders and delivery
> > I want to switch from POP3 to IMAP (finally). > > I cannot imagine why any enterprise would want to switch from POP3 to > IMAP. They are designed to do completely different things. POP3 > exists to get the email the heck off your server as quickly as > possible, whereas IMAP is designed to keep the email on your server > forever. > > Unless you chose the wrong protocol in the first place, why are you > switching? Firstly, I'm not an enterprise :) Secondly, POP3 is easily chosen because it's more compatible in general. There are hardly any MUA:s out there that doesn't support it properly, while the same is not true for IMAP. I've switched to IMAP because it gives me more freedom to switch MUAs and access my mail from anywhere with an IMAP capable client. Wheather the mail is stored locally or on the server doesn't make much difference in my cast, except in so far as it affects availability. -- / Peter Schuller, InfiDyne Technologies HB PGP userID: 0xE9758B7D or 'Peter Schuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>' Key retrival: Send an E-Mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.scode.org PGP signature
Re: Mail servers in private network
At 16:00 01.07.2001 +0800, Mr. Egg wrote: >Hi, sirs, > > I has a question about mail servers in private network. I use a network >sharing device (NAT) to share a public ip address with my colleagues. We >have 4 mail servers, one with public ip (static mapped by NAT), three are >inside private network. > > NAT device: > ifconfig: 192.168.1.1 (private interface), 203.76.12.1 (public >interface) > static mapping: DNS to 192.168.1.2, Mail server to: 192.168.1.3 > DNS server: 192.168.1.2 (example.com) > qmail server #1: 192.168.1.3 (example.com), (Static mapped by NAT) > qmail server #2: 192.168.1.4 (hr.example.com) > qmail server #3: 192.168.1.5 (mis.example.com) > qmail server #4: 192.168.1.6 (acct.example.com) > > First question is about sending mail. To make receipt reply correctly, >does all inner mail servers (#2~#4) must relay by the first mail server >(#1)? and how can I configurating these inner mail server? Set up an smtproute to server #1 > Second question is about receiving mail. When a user outside this >company, and send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] through his ISP, he will >fail because mis.example.com is within a private network. When I configurate >my DNS to let hr.example.com, mis.example.com and acct.example.com to point >to 203.76.12.1, all mail will be sent to the first mail server. How do I >configurate my DNS or qmail to let the three inner mail servers work as >their are in public network? Set the external MX records all to server #1, and set up smtproutes to the inner three servers > Best Regards > Mr. Egg -- -- Lukas Beeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Homepage: http://www.projectdream.org --
Mail servers in private network
Hi, sirs, I has a question about mail servers in private network. I use a network sharing device (NAT) to share a public ip address with my colleagues. We have 4 mail servers, one with public ip (static mapped by NAT), three are inside private network. NAT device: ifconfig: 192.168.1.1 (private interface), 203.76.12.1 (public interface) static mapping: DNS to 192.168.1.2, Mail server to: 192.168.1.3 DNS server: 192.168.1.2 (example.com) qmail server #1: 192.168.1.3 (example.com), (Static mapped by NAT) qmail server #2: 192.168.1.4 (hr.example.com) qmail server #3: 192.168.1.5 (mis.example.com) qmail server #4: 192.168.1.6 (acct.example.com) First question is about sending mail. To make receipt reply correctly, does all inner mail servers (#2~#4) must relay by the first mail server (#1)? and how can I configurating these inner mail server? Second question is about receiving mail. When a user outside this company, and send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] through his ISP, he will fail because mis.example.com is within a private network. When I configurate my DNS to let hr.example.com, mis.example.com and acct.example.com to point to 203.76.12.1, all mail will be sent to the first mail server. How do I configurate my DNS or qmail to let the three inner mail servers work as their are in public network? Best Regards Mr. Egg
Re: Logs
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 12:00:03AM +0200, NDSoftware wrote: > Hello, > I have for exemple: > @40003b3e495c2ec85f2c info msg 195881: bytes 2951 from > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 13962 uid 503 > How i can get date and time ? $ /usr/local/bin/tai64nlocal (part of the daemontools package). > Can i customise logs of qmail for get more informations like IP, date, > time,... The remote IP address will be in your qmail-smtpd log, not the qmail-send log, if you run qmail-smtpd from tcpserver with -v. > How work the logrotate of qmail ? See http://cr.yp.to/daemontools/multilog.html> > How i can like the logotate program send the logs by e-mail ? See that same page, look for '!processor'. Vince.
Re: Help about mail-abuse testing
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 08:55:47AM +0200, Vincent Schonau wrote: > On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 02:03:34PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ percenthack ] >> How can I pass the test! > You passed the test. That message didn't get delivered. Correction. Do $ cat /var/qmail/control/percenthack If you get 'No such file or directory' the message didn't get delivered, and you passed the test. Vince.
