Re: Does qmail-send rescan the queue when there are delivery failures, too?
Those are Failures: @40003a8c3cc1118607d4 delivery 22609: failure: Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name._(#5.1.1)/ @40003a8c3cc12394e8dc delivery 22610: failure: Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name._(#5.1.1)/ @40003a8c3cc128cb2f14 delivery 22611: failure: Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name._(#5.1.1)/ @40003a8c3fce2155c294 delivery 22623: failure: 216.115.107.17_failed_after_I_sent_the_message./Remote_host_said:_554_delivery_error:_dd_User_is_over_the_quota.__You_can_try_again_later._-_mta314.mail.yahoo.com/ @40003a8c3fcf0e2cd66c delivery 22624: failure: Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name._(#5.1.1)/ @40003a8c3fcf26b5acf4 delivery 22625: failure: Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name._(#5.1.1)/ Peter van Dijk wrote: > What do you mean by a delivery failure? > > Greetz, Peter. -- Bye Michael...
Does qmail-send rescan the queue when there are delivery failures, too?
You know when qmail receives a Bounce it reinjects the Message in the queue and then the queue is rescanned. But what happens when there is a Delivery Failure and not a Bounce ? -- Thanks for fast Answer! Michael..
Re: high volume server configurations
> > I also applied these patches: > > qmail-1.03]# patch -p1 > > > qmail-1.03]# patch -p1 > I got this error: > > 1 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file spawn.c.rej > > Try -p0, perhaps. > > Greetz, Peter. I have Errors, too with Solaris patch Tool but with GNU patch it's ok -- Michael..
qmail + Solaris 7.0 fatal: data 451 qq write error or disk full (#4.3.0)
Someone knows why I get fatal: data 451 qq write error or disk full (#4.3.0) ? It comes after different Message Counts when sending via SMTP. I think there is an Error in that qmail-smtpd. Any Solutions ? Never seen that on Linux btw. -- Michael..
qmail Speed
http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/1999/12/msg00465.html This here exactly describes the Situation! -- Michael..
Re: qmail speed solaris
Dave Sill wrote: > You asked this yesterday. Do you think the answer is different today? Yes, may depend on You! > In my responses to you yesterday, I *twice* asked if you'd tried > turning off qmail-send during the injection of your mass of > messages. You never answered that question. Yes I did. I don't answer to lame Questions because I can figure this Point out my own, sorry. > What you're trying to do (send 500,000 separate messages ASAP) will > tax any decent MTA. Sending 500,000 seperate Messages for www.payback.de (Service like Paypal) Where Users get personalized e-Mails and personalized Info. For more Details www.flatfox.com should help. > If you could achieve a massive performance gain > simply by stopping qmail-send while you're queueing the messages, why > not do it? What in my Situation is exactly. The Messages are out of the todo queue. They should be sent out. But that is too slow because there are just so few qmail-remote Processes!!! They don't come up like on Linux. Just about 15-20. That's not much. On Linux it goes much higher. And there appeared another Situation now. Because the queue Directory is overloaded there are too many fsyncs. But that is not the Main Issue because it's just the Effect of a very overloaded queue. > -Dave -- Michael..
qmail speed solaris
Setup is Solaris 7 and qmail + big todo + big concurrency What's going wrong here ? Thanks for Answer! 2001-02-02 18:31:10.045668500 status: local 0/250 remote 6/400 2001-02-02 18:31:10.626628500 status: local 0/250 remote 5/400 2001-02-02 18:31:10.988526500 status: local 0/250 remote 6/400 2001-02-02 18:31:11.242266500 status: local 0/250 remote 5/400 2001-02-02 18:31:12.498209500 status: local 0/250 remote 6/400 2001-02-02 18:31:12.758255500 status: local 0/250 remote 5/400 2001-02-02 18:31:13.512637500 status: local 0/250 remote 4/400 2001-02-02 18:31:13.512677500 status: local 0/250 remote 3/400 2001-02-02 18:31:14.110244500 status: local 0/250 remote 4/400 2001-02-02 18:31:15.217011500 status: local 0/250 remote 5/400 2001-02-02 18:31:16.326612500 status: local 0/250 remote 6/400 2001-02-02 18:31:17.261962500 status: local 0/250 remote 7/400 2001-02-02 18:31:18.288743500 status: local 0/250 remote 8/400 2001-02-02 18:31:18.344190500 status: local 0/250 remote 7/400 2001-02-02 18:31:19.068162500 status: local 0/250 remote 6/400 2001-02-02 18:31:19.513895500 status: local 0/250 remote 7/400 2001-02-02 18:31:21.045123500 status: local 0/250 remote 8/400 2001-02-02 18:31:21.519778500 status: local 0/250 remote 9/400 2001-02-02 18:31:21.876854500 status: local 0/250 remote 8/400 2001-02-02 18:31:22.181505500 status: local 0/250 remote 9/400 2001-02-02 18:31:22.592612500 status: local 0/250 remote 8/400 2001-02-02 18:31:22.906265500 status: local 0/250 remote 9/400 2001-02-02 18:31:23.378089500 status: local 0/250 remote 8/400 2001-02-02 18:31:24.121749500 status: local 0/250 remote 9/400 2001-02-02 18:31:24.247379500 status: local 1/250 remote 9/400 2001-02-02 18:31:24.661445500 status: local 1/250 remote 10/400 2001-02-02 18:31:24.724051500 status: local 0/250 remote 10/400 2001-02-02 18:31:24.929906500 status: local 0/250 remote 9/400 2001-02-02 18:31:25.111401500 status: local 0/250 remote 8/400 2001-02-02 18:31:25.123478500 status: local 0/250 remote 7/400 2001-02-02 18:31:25.283466500 status: local 0/250 remote 8/400 2001-02-02 18:31:25.928988500 status: local 0/250 remote 7/400 2001-02-02 18:31:26.061302500 status: local 0/250 remote 8/400 2001-02-02 18:31:26.309151500 status: local 0/250 remote 7/400 2001-02-02 18:31:26.666340500 status: local 0/250 remote 8/400 2001-02-02 18:31:27.110578500 status: local 0/250 remote 7/400 2001-02-02 18:31:27.271065500 status: local 0/250 remote 8/400 2001-02-02 18:31:27.768450500 status: local 0/250 remote 7/400 2001-02-02 18:31:28.140657500 status: local 0/250 remote 8/400 2001-02-02 18:31:28.845633500 status: local 0/250 remote 7/400 2001-02-02 18:31:29.469632500 status: local 0/250 remote 6/400 2001-02-02 18:31:29.508004500 status: local 0/250 remote 5/400 2001-02-02 18:31:29.572893500 status: local 0/250 remote 4/400 2001-02-02 18:31:29.771258500 status: local 0/250 remote 5/400 2001-02-02 18:31:30.622597500 status: local 0/250 remote 6/400 2001-02-02 18:31:30.698784500 status: local 0/250 remote 5/400 2001-02-02 18:31:31.363765500 status: local 0/250 remote 6/400 2001-02-02 18:31:31.638018500 status: local 0/250 remote 5/400 2001-02-02 18:31:31.658633500 status: local 0/250 remote 4/400 2001-02-02 18:31:31.673940500 status: local 0/250 remote 3/400 2001-02-02 18:31:31.817495500 status: local 0/250 remote 4/400 2001-02-02 18:31:32.349743500 status: local 0/250 remote 3/400
Re: qmail speed improvement
Steve Kennedy wrote: > what's your favourite colour ? > > Steve Blue! Uhmm... No Yellow! ;-) -- --^..^---------- michael maier - system & development administrator flatfox ag, hanauer landstrasse 196a d-60314 frankfurt am main fon+49.(0)69.50 95 98-308 fax+49.(0)69.50 95 98-101 email [EMAIL PROTECTED] urlhttp://www.flatfox.com - m a k e m y d a y
Re: qmail speed improvement
Dave Sill wrote: > OK, no need to get excited. So, have you tried stopping qmail-send > until the messages are injected? > > I think you're seeing the combination of two problems: the first is > disk bandwidth on the queue partition, and the second is the > single-threaded nature of qmail-send: it can't simultaneously hand > messages off to qmail-remote and process new messages coming into the > queue. Run iostat on the queue disk to see how busy it is. > > >SCSI Disk (SUN UFS) > > Do you have DiskSuite? If so, making the queue filesystem a Trans > device (logging) should help. The Disk is allright. But then if qmail-send is single threaded that's a very big Bottleneck in the complete Package slowing it down rapidely. This should be improved really! -- Michael..
Re: qmail speed improvement
Justin Bell wrote: > On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 05:12:36PM +0100, Michael Maier wrote: > # > mean airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow? > # > # Dunno, gonna search on Google! :-) > > the correct response would be 'African or European?' > > -- > Justin Bell If you are Monty Python, yes! :-) -- Michael..
Re: qmail speed improvement
> How? 500,000 separate messages or one message with 500,000 recipients? > If the former, have you tried stopping qmail-send until the messages > are injected--and do you really need to send each recipient a > different message? They are seperate messages and Yes it's needed because those are personalized e-Mails! > >Why are there just average of 4 concurrent qmail-remote Processes ? > >How to improve it ? > > What else is the system doing beside sending your mails? Beeing failover Apache Webserver. But Main Job is Mailserver! > What kind of > disk is the queue on? SCSI Disk (SUN UFS) > What is your network connectivity? 10 MBit Internet Connection. Lan is 100 MBit. > What is the > mean airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow? Dunno, gonna search on Google! :-) > -Dave -- Michael..
Re: qmail speed improvement
Sorry, I'm using multilog for logging. And here is a Cut from Logs... -- 2001-02-01 16:07:00.591559500 status: local 0/250 remote 4/400 2001-02-01 16:07:01.136160500 new msg 709520 2001-02-01 16:07:01.176806500 info msg 709520: bytes 5581 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 25704 uid 101 2001-02-01 16:07:02.265784500 end msg 697387 2001-02-01 16:07:02.356404500 delivery 67273: success: 205.188.156.129_accepted_message./Remote_host_said:_250_OK/ 2001-02-01 16:07:02.386210500 status: local 0/250 remote 3/400 2001-02-01 16:07:02.386383500 delivery 67274: success: 152.163.224.122_accepted_message./Remote_host_said:_250_OK/ 2001-02-01 16:07:02.427978500 status: local 0/250 remote 2/400 2001-02-01 16:07:02.544169500 new msg 710041 2001-02-01 16:07:02.556813500 info msg 710041: bytes 5267 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 27810 uid 101 2001-02-01 16:07:03.080165500 starting delivery 67275: msg 698429 to remote [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-02-01 16:07:03.080480500 status: local 0/250 remote 3/400 2001-02-01 16:07:03.081277500 end msg 695824 2001-02-01 16:07:03.135796500 new msg 710562 2001-02-01 16:07:03.143146500 info msg 710562: bytes 4864 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 706 uid 101 2001-02-01 16:07:03.224924500 end msg 62 2001-02-01 16:07:03.302477500 new msg 711083 2001-02-01 16:07:03.326604500 info msg 711083: bytes 5300 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 2831 uid 101 2001-02-01 16:07:03.505963500 starting delivery 67276: msg 699471 to remote [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-02-01 16:07:03.505979500 status: local 0/250 remote 4/400 2001-02-01 16:07:03.505987500 end msg 698950 2001-02-01 16:07:03.560075500 new msg 712125 2001-02-01 16:07:03.569882500 info msg 712125: bytes 5273 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 7278 uid 101 2001-02-01 16:07:03.670697500 new msg 713167 2001-02-01 16:07:03.670707500 info msg 713167: bytes 4860 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 11492 uid 101 2001-02-01 16:07:03.754286500 starting delivery 67277: msg 700513 to remote [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-02-01 16:07:03.754304500 status: local 0/250 remote 5/400 2001-02-01 16:07:03.786734500 new msg 713688 2001-02-01 16:07:03.794230500 info msg 713688: bytes 5282 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 13649 uid 101 2001-02-01 16:07:03.883307500 new msg 720982 2001-02-01 16:07:03.895637500 info msg 720982: bytes 4861 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 15475 uid 101 2001-02-01 16:07:04.133091500 starting delivery 67278: msg 702597 to remote [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-02-01 16:07:04.133110500 status: local 0/250 remote 6/400 2001-02-01 16:07:04.250982500 new msg 721503 2001-02-01 16:07:04.250989500 info msg 721503: bytes 4880 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 17503 uid 101 2001-02-01 16:07:04.439898500 new msg 722024 2001-02-01 16:07:04.470841500 info msg 722024: bytes 4860 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 19692 uid 101 2001-02-01 16:07:04.714957500 starting delivery 67279: msg 703639 to remote [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-02-01 16:07:04.714977500 status: local 0/250 remote 7/400 2001-02-01 16:07:04.714984500 delivery 67278: success: 194.45.170.86_accepted_message./Remote_host_said:_250_Mail_accepted/ 2001-02-01 16:07:04.774655500 status: local 0/250 remote 6/400 2001-02-01 16:07:04.897669500 new msg 722545 2001-02-01 16:07:04.909640500 info msg 722545: bytes 5275 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 21935 uid 101 2001-02-01 16:07:05.232365500 end msg 702597 2001-02-01 16:07:05.311545500 delivery 67272: success: 205.188.156.229_accepted_message./Remote_host_said:_250_OK/ 2001-02-01 16:07:05.345557500 status: local 0/250 remote 5/400 2001-02-01 16:07:05.345569500 delivery 67275: success: 128.11.22.89_accepted_message./Remote_host_said:_250_ok_dirdel/ 2001-02-01 16:07:05.403328500 status: local 0/250 remote 4/400 2001-02-01 16:07:05.445345500 new msg 723066 2001-02-01 16:07:05.463266500 info msg 723066: bytes 4847 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 24021 uid 101 2001-02-01 16:07:05.852987500 starting delivery 67280: msg 704681 to remote [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-02-01 16:07:05.853006500 status: local 0/250 remote 5/400 Thanks, Michael.. Charles Cazabon wrote: > Depends on your setup. Could be syslog is taking 80+% of your CPU if you're > logging with that. It could be that you're testing over an internal network > with microsecond latency and your deliveries all complete in a millisecond. It > could be any of a hundred things. You haven't given us any information to > diagnose your situation. > > Your qmail logs will contain information on this. Analyze those. If you > have trouble doing that, post a relevant section of your logs showing > concurrency not growing above 4. > > Charles
qmail speed improvement
Hi, I'm running qmail on Solaris 7 (SUN Netra T1) and I am trying to send out 500.000 e-Mails for Testing. I setup a Remote Concurrency of 400 and have queue Directory Split + Big Todo Server Patches. Why are there just average of 4 concurrent qmail-remote Processes ? How to improve it ? -- Thanks, Michael
Re: supervise fatal errors
Just go into the affected Directories and delete those lock Files manually. Because UFS Solaris is a bit laggy in I/O this Problem occurs when you stop and start your qmail Programs too fast! -- Michael Maier / http://www.shell-provider.net Fish Flowers wrote: > I've gotten qmail to compile, and my init scripts set up, but when I run > "qmail start", I get the following: > > Starting qmail: svscan > . > supervise: fatal: unable to acquire qmail-send/supervise/lock: temporary > failure > supervise: fatal: unable to acquire log/supervise/lock: temporary > failure > supervise: fatal: unable to acquire qmail-smtpd/supervise/lock: temporary > failure > supervise: fatal: unable to acquire log/supervise/lock: temporary failure > > The supervise fatal errors repeat every couple of seconds. > > This is a SunOS 5.7 box, running qmail-1.03. Any thoughts? > > Fish.
Re: qmail-pop3d broken LAST command
> I noticed that qmail-pop3d always responds with: < +OK 0 to the pop3 > command LAST > This behavior makes pop3 clients like fetchmail unable to know which > messages are new and thus download all the messages. So running > fetchmail two successive times without deleting mail from the pop3 > server would retrieve two copies of all messages. > Is there any patch out for that ? > > Thanks http://homepages.munich.netsurf.de/Franz.Sirl/qmail-pop3d-1.03.diff -- CYA, Michael
Re: QMail DOS
> We are in the midst of a security audit performed by Ernst & Young. > They are claiming something about a DOS situation. What I need to > find out is whether there are any known DOS situations out there. If > so what needs to be done to take care of the problem. ThanksAndy Just use tcpserver or xinetd! CYA, Michael..
Re: bandwidth monitoring/analysis
> OK Thanks but i haven't two ip on my server ! Give it an internal IP, and let it map with your Firewall =) -- Ciao, Michael..
Re: couldn't find any host
Henning Brauer wrote: > On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 08:55:36PM -0500, Jeff Bolle wrote: > > Jan 20 12:54:30 mail qmail: 980024070.874084 delivery 14: failure: > > Sorry,_I_couldn't_find_any_host_named_bucknell.edu._(#5.1.2)/ > > DNS problem. > > This machine is > > currently using register.com's domain servers in resolv.conf. Any help > > Aie! You have a great misunderstanding of DNS. I'd recommend reading > http://www.lifewithdjbdns.org, it explains a _lot_ about DNS in general and > djbdns. Too bad that Web Site seems to be written from People who are just installing DJBdns and jump when it works but not for real Life Examples! I recommend http://www.acmebw.com/askmr.htm
Re: bandwidth monitoring/analysis
NDSoftware wrote: > I search too but i need the bandwith used by domains and install a quota ! > > Nicolas DEFFAYET, NDSoftware > http://www.ndsoftware.net - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > France: Tel +33 671887502 - Fax N/A > UK: Tel +44 8453348750 - Fax +44 8453348751 > USA: Tel N/A - Fax N/A > > -Original Message- > From: Barry Smoke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 9:37 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Vmailmgr@Lists. Em. Ca > Subject: bandwidth monitoring/analysis > > I am in need of some bandidth monitoring/analysis, of qmail... > I need to know what percentage of bandwidth of all running processes qmail > is taking, and of that bandwidht, what percentage each virtual domain is > taking... > I am using the vmailmgr package for virtual domains... > > Any suggestions greatly appreciated. > > Barry Smoke I am currently figuring out myself how to do it and yesterday I found a nice Patch on qmail.org so qmail-remote can used fixed IP. So what I would do is patching qmail and giving it a dedicated IP. After doing that I would install snmp + mrtg for this IP. After doing that it should be really no Problem to see which Bandwidth qmail is using! -- --^..^-- michael maier - system & development administrator flatfox ag, hanauer landstrasse 196a d-60314 frankfurt am main fon+49.(0)69.50 95 98-308 fax+49.(0)69.50 95 98-101 email [EMAIL PROTECTED] urlhttp://www.flatfox.com - m a k e m y d a y
Re: Anybody heard from Michael Samuel?
> > No. This shows even more the need for multiple archives and mirrors of > the > > contributions around qmail. > > Shouldn't we build a nice structure around this? > > Now everyone sits around with their own little qmail-page. If all > these were > > at least archivable together the qmail-world would have been a safer > place. > > As always, I totally agree with Magnus ;-> > > I'd be willing to contribute with time and (maybe) bandwidth. > > -Johan So best would be if all Servers have the Files directly on Disk! Same like freshmeat, sourceforge and others. =) CYA, Michael.
Re: speed of machines
Alex Kramarov wrote: > I think (judging from my experience), that you can handle at least > 2 mails a day. i have P550 with 128MB ram and I sometimes take more > then 20 a day. I tested it single threaded! Got 40 Mails/s on an AMD Athlon 888 MhZ, 256 MB RAM & IBM DTLA307030 30,7 GB HD (UDMA 100) --^..^------ michael maier - system & development administrator flatfox ag, hanauer landstrasse 196a d-60314 frankfurt am main fon+49.(0)69.50 95 98-308 fax+49.(0)69.50 95 98-101 email [EMAIL PROTECTED] urlhttp://www.flatfox.com - m a k e m y d a y
Re: Speed Problem
Mark Delany wrote: > Sigh. What do you mean by slow? 1000 deliveries a second? One delivery > a day? You haven't defined what you mean by slow and haven't shown how > what happens is different. > > How about some log files showing what you think are slow deliveries? > > Remember, we know nothing about your system so imagine someone came to > you and said "my mail is slow". What sort of information would you > need to solve that problem? Then imagine that we need that information > too. > > Btw. The log message you "sort of" showed indicates a problem with your > particular installation. > > Regards. With slow I mean 2,5 Mails/Second And here the Log (tail -50) @40003a560097224f16b4 end msg 993330 @40003a5611343730e60c new msg 993330 @40003a561134373487bc info msg 993330: bytes 730 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 2383 uid 60001 @40003a56113501ad86fc starting delivery 3850: msg 993330 to remote [EMAIL PROTECTED] @40003a56113501b06944 status: local 0/10 remote 1/400 @40003a56113510332204 delivery 3850: success: 213.61.184.157_accepted_message./Remote_host_said:_250_Ok/ @40003a56113510f8045c status: local 0/10 remote 0/400 @40003a56113510ff66fc end msg 993330 @40003a5679b306f91a54 new msg 993330 @40003a5679b306fcb81c info msg 993330: bytes 864 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 3406 uid 60001 @40003a5679b30d41b31c starting delivery 3851: msg 993330 to remote [EMAIL PROTECTED] @40003a5679b30d44994c status: local 0/10 remote 1/400 @40003a5679b32d659adc delivery 3851: success: 213.61.184.157_accepted_message./Remote_host_said:_250_Ok/ @40003a5679b32e4e3d8c status: local 0/10 remote 0/400 @40003a5679b32e55b79c end msg 993330 @40003a567b0510862fbc new msg 993330 @40003a567b05108656cc info msg 993330: bytes 829 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 3411 uid 60001 @40003a567b0516447e2c starting delivery 3852: msg 993330 to remote [EMAIL PROTECTED] @40003a567b0516476844 status: local 0/10 remote 1/400 @40003a567b051a6dc51c delivery 3852: success: 213.61.184.157_accepted_message./Remote_host_said:_250_Ok/ @40003a567b051b45c5fc status: local 0/10 remote 0/400 @40003a567b051b4d112c end msg 993330 @40003a57591829e1bbac new msg 993330 @40003a57591829e5846c info msg 993330: bytes 917 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 5479 uid 60001 @40003a5759183162efcc starting delivery 3853: msg 993330 to remote [EMAIL PROTECTED] @40003a57591831631eac status: local 0/10 remote 1/400 @40003a575919049bc964 delivery 3853: success: 213.61.184.157_accepted_message./Remote_host_said:_250_Ok/ @40003a575919058cc0e4 status: local 0/10 remote 0/400 @40003a57591905943af4 end msg 993330 @40003a57c2e8339af9c4 new msg 993330 @40003a57c2e8339b20d4 info msg 993330: bytes 768 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 6674 uid 60001 @40003a57c2e838bf2b14 starting delivery 3854: msg 993330 to remote [EMAIL PROTECTED] @40003a57c2e838bf5224 status: local 0/10 remote 1/400 @40003a57c2e90d7a66bc delivery 3854: success: 213.61.184.157_accepted_message./Remote_host_said:_250_Ok/ @40003a57c2e90e85d3ac status: local 0/10 remote 0/400 @40003a57c2e90e8d45ec end msg 993330 @40003a5869cb2dff620c new msg 993330 @40003a5869cb2dff8d04 info msg 993330: bytes 728 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 8079 uid 60001 @40003a5869cb3469696c starting delivery 3855: msg 993330 to remote [EMAIL PROTECTED] @40003a5869cb3469907c status: local 0/10 remote 1/400 @40003a5869cc085673ec delivery 3855: success: 213.61.184.157_accepted_message./Remote_host_said:_250_Ok/ @40003a5869cc0949114c status: local 0/10 remote 0/400 @40003a5869cc09507004 end msg 993330 @40003a58ceec349c9314 new msg 993330 @40003a58ceec349cba24 info msg 993330: bytes 839 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 9943 uid 60001 @40003a58ceed00c5902c starting delivery 3856: msg 993330 to remote [EMAIL PROTECTED] @40003a58ceed00c5de4c status: local 0/10 remote 1/400 @40003a58cef10f297264 delivery 3856: success: 213.61.184.157_accepted_message./Remote_host_said:_250_Ok/ @40003a58cef11007a91c status: local 0/10 remote 0/400
Speed Problem
Hi again! I'm running qmail with big concurrency and big todo patch under Solaris 7 on a mirrored Disk. It's horrible slow and sometimes there is a Message while sending Mail: "451 qq trouble creating files in queue(#4.3.0)" Possible Bottlenecks could be the semaphore Mechanism or the Solaris File System but it's very uncommon. So maybe you People could help me out of this Disaster! It's a SUN Netra T1 Machine. qmail Config is: qmail home directory: /var/qmail. user-ext delimiter: -. paternalism (in decimal): 2. silent concurrency limit: 2045. subdirectory split: 521. user ids: 100, 101, 102, 0, 103, 104, 105, 106. group ids: 100, 101. badmailfrom: (Default.) Any MAIL FROM is allowed. bouncefrom: (Default.) Bounce user name is MAILER-DAEMON. bouncehost: (Default.) Bounce host name is hermes.flatfox.de. concurrencylocal: Local concurrency is 250. concurrencyremote: Remote concurrency is 400. databytes: (Default.) SMTP DATA limit is 0 bytes. defaultdomain: Default domain name is flatfox.de. defaulthost: Default host name is hermes.flatfox.de. doublebouncehost: (Default.) 2B recipient host: hermes.flatfox.de. doublebounceto: (Default.) 2B recipient user: postmaster. envnoathost: (Default.) Presumed domain name is hermes.flatfox.de. helohost: (Default.) SMTP client HELO host name is hermes.flatfox.de. idhost: (Default.) Message-ID host name is hermes.flatfox.de. localiphost: (Default.) Local IP address becomes hermes.flatfox.de. locals: Messages for flatmail.flatfox.de are delivered locally. Messages for flatmail.flatfox.com are delivered locally. Messages for zeus.flatfox.de are delivered locally. Messages for hermes.flatfox.de are delivered locally. Messages for localhost are delivered locally. me: My name is hermes.flatfox.de. percenthack: (Default.) The percent hack is not allowed. plusdomain: Plus domain name is flatfox.de. qmqpservers: (Default.) No QMQP servers. queuelifetime: Message lifetime in the queue is 259200 seconds. rcpthosts: SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at flatfox.de. SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at flatmail.flatfox.de. SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at zeus.flatfox.de. SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at flatfox.com. SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at flatfox.co.uk. SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at flatfox.fr. SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at localhost. SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at e-trend.de. morercpthosts: (Default.) No effect. morercpthosts.cdb: (Default.) No effect. smtpgreeting: SMTP greeting: 220 flatfox service. smtproutes: timeoutconnect: SMTP client connection timeout is 60 seconds. timeoutremote: SMTP client data timeout is 1200 seconds. timeoutsmtpd: SMTP server data timeout is 1200 seconds. virtualdomains: (Default.) No virtual domains. defaultdelivery: I have no idea what this file does. Thanks a lot! Michael..
Re: Stress Test
> >No, it hasn't a Mail Header in it. > > Ding! Ding! Ding! We have a winner. > > Sean But why it works for 100 Mails then ? Michael..
Re: Stress Test
> I'm confused. You say, 'it worked fine', then you say 'email has > not been sent'. Which is it? Sorry! I forgot to right down it worked fine when sending about 100 Messages. > If you are sending a an identical message to 500,000 people, consider > one message with a half-million recipients, rather that trying to > inject a half-million messages in the queue. Message is unique currently but final Messages will be personalized. CU, Michael!
Re: Stress Test
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 10:11:37AM +0100, Michael Maier wrote: > >system 'qmail-inject $addr < 50k.data'; > > Does 50k.data have a Mail header on it? Just a guess... No, it hasn't a Mail Header in it. I think maybe it will be solved by putting some additional random Chars in Front of the File. > >I really need to know where the Bottleneck is because I need to sendout > >500.000 Mails in 36 hrs. > > Good luck... I hope your ISP doesn't mind you pushing 25GB of data in > 36 hours. They don't mind because it's colocated Hosting and we pay much Money for it and Traffic is not billed. Billed is the load of the Line. (Bandwidth Usage) > Sean
Re: Time zone
Alessander Salgueirosa wrote: > Hi all > > Well, this is my firt time on the list. > I need a help. > > I have the qmail on a linux red hat 6.2 . > All is fine except the time zone. > > when i reboot my machine the time zone get one other set, not expected > > my machine is set to GMT -3 America São Paulo. > It's not a hardware matter, and on other machines that have red hat 6.2 > whitout > qmail it not heappens. > > Somebody knows about it ??? Use linuxconf on Red Hat Systems to adjust the Timezone!! --^..^------ michael maier - system & development administrator flatfox ag, hanauer landstrasse 196a d-60314 frankfurt am main fon+49.(0)69.50 95 98-308 fax+49.(0)69.50 95 98-101 email [EMAIL PROTECTED] urlhttp://www.flatfox.com - m a k e m y d a y
Re: IS TIME_WAIT has somethings to do with qmail?
Ould wrote: > > That looks like a Firewall Problem. :-) > > > > Can you explain this few please? Just open Port 25 TCP (for SMTP) and Port 110 (if you are using POP3) on your Firewall.
Re: IS TIME_WAIT has somethings to do with qmail?
Ould wrote: > Hello, > > I have a lot of TIME_WAIT (TCP/IP) on my mail server. And > this grow with time, I think that it well crash my server. > > I'm asking if this has no relation with qmail? > > Thanks That looks like a Firewall Problem. :-) --^..^------ michael maier - system & development administrator flatfox ag, hanauer landstrasse 196a d-60314 frankfurt am main fon+49.(0)69.50 95 98-308 fax+49.(0)69.50 95 98-101 email [EMAIL PROTECTED] urlhttp://www.flatfox.com - m a k e m y d a y
Stress Test
Hi People!
I was running the following Perl Script for Stress Test qmail:
#!/usr/local/bin/perl
use Thread;
my $addr = "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"; # change to desired mail address!!
my $var1 = 100;
my $count = 0;
for(my $a=0; $a<10; $a++)
{
my $ref = new Thread \&sendit;
lock &sendit;
}
print "done.\n";
sub sendit{
for(my $x=0;$x<10; $x++){
system 'qmail-inject $addr < 50k.data';
}
}
But when I run it worked fine. 50k.data is a File with 50 KB Random
Data.
The e-Mails have not been send out.
So what I wanna know is if the qmail server blocks the Spam to that
Mailbox?
I really need to know where the Bottleneck is because I need to sendout
500.000 Mails in 36 hrs.
Thanks,
Michael.
Re: Oracle + Qmail
"Jonathan D. Poole" wrote: > I don't care to much about the front end of things, they can always be > written, I'm more intrested in a mirror of mysql+qmail setup, just > integrated with oracle instead. I don't know if anything has to be totally > rewritten, or if it's just DBA related configuration, however It would be > much more scaleable if qmail could work with Oracle. You're right because it's just another SQL Style! -- --^..^------ michael maier - system & development administrator flatfox ag, hanauer landstrasse 196a d-60314 frankfurt am main fon+49.(0)69.50 95 98-308 fax+49.(0)69.50 95 98-101 email [EMAIL PROTECTED] urlhttp://www.flatfox.com - m a k e m y d a y
Re: about smtp.rules
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > what's smtp.rules. > which package produce this file? > === > from relay-ctrl-age.c > const char* smtprules = "smtp.rules"; Checkout the tcprules Program! It's Component of tcpserver... --^..^---------- michael maier - system & development administrator flatfox ag, hanauer landstrasse 196a d-60314 frankfurt am main fon+49.(0)69.50 95 98-308 fax+49.(0)69.50 95 98-101 email [EMAIL PROTECTED] urlhttp://www.flatfox.com - m a k e m y d a y
Tool for running Probetest under Solaris!
Hi all! You got a Tool for running a Probetest of e-Mail Delivery?? I wanna probe on 10 MBit. My Boss doesn't believe me it's the Bandwidth which causes the 9 Secs. Average Message Delay. Many Thanks in Advance!! CYA, Micha..
Re: Quality of this List
Markus Stumpf wrote: > I don't think it's the quantity that counts ... > > And I think this list is on its best way to loose some more helpers. > Highly skilled people that surely wrote some hundred helpful posts > throughout the years. > > IMHO this whining newbie threads are enough now. > > \Maex That is exactly what I said so I agree! -- CYA, Michael PS: I can see that Rubberduck!
Quality of this List - Thread seems to be out of Control
"Robin S.Socha" wrote: > tandardized Bonehead Reply Form > > I took exception to your recent > > ___ post/spam to _. > > (newsgroup) > > _x_ email. > > It was (check all that apply): > > _x_ lame. > > _x_ stupid. > > _x_ ignorant. > > _x_ much longer than any worthwhile thought of which you > > may be capable. Quoting you I have to say: "What has this to do with qmail??!" You are a really lame Actor and getting some People angry. --^..^-- michael maier - system & development administrator flatfox ag, hanauer landstrasse 196a d-60314 frankfurt am main fon+49.(0)69.50 95 98-308 fax+49.(0)69.50 95 98-101 email [EMAIL PROTECTED] urlhttp://www.flatfox.com - m a k e m y d a y
Re: Relay-ctrl installed but can't auth
Did you make the needed crontab Entries?? --^..^-- michael maier - system & development administrator flatfox ag, hanauer landstrasse 196a d-60314 frankfurt am main fon+49.(0)69.50 95 98-308 fax+49.(0)69.50 95 98-101 email [EMAIL PROTECTED] urlhttp://www.flatfox.com - m a k e m y d a y
Re: The new "Advanced" qmail lists
Goran Blazic wrote: > And he is modest also... :) > > Goran :p Of course! ;-)) CYA, Michael
Re: The new "Advanced" qmail lists
rmiddleton wrote: > Right on :> A true IT guy :> >From another true IT Guy doing Unix Administration, coding Perl, Delphi, PHP, Visual Basic, ... and having own ISP/ASP Firm, yeah! Yes I can proll, too! ;-) --^..^------ michael maier - system & development administrator flatfox ag, hanauer landstrasse 196a d-60314 frankfurt am main fon+49.(0)69.50 95 98-308 fax+49.(0)69.50 95 98-101 email [EMAIL PROTECTED] urlhttp://www.flatfox.com - m a k e m y d a y
Re: Quality of this List
I don't think it's very wise to run out on different Lists. What we need is what Brett and I discussed. A 24/7 List which is highly available! That can be only achieved with redundant Hardware. As I said to Brett already it's in our Intresst to bring that new List then into a high level based List which offers good Quality and I've seen now those 2 List you mentioned here. They are not very fast. What I can offer is a redundant System with 100 MBit switched Connection (2,4 Gbit/sec Uplink). I have seen Mestdagh has a nice Interface, too but I still don't like that Threading System. It's a bit too complicated. Why we don't share our Resources we have and think and setup a really good List? Thanks --^..^---------- michael maier - system & development administrator flatfox ag, hanauer landstrasse 196a d-60314 frankfurt am main fon+49.(0)69.50 95 98-308 fax+49.(0)69.50 95 98-101 email [EMAIL PROTECTED] urlhttp://www.flatfox.com - m a k e m y d a y
Quality of this List
The Quality of this List Service dramaticly decreased. All I see are Messages containing Newbie Questions already solved about at least ten times. I'm flooded by Shit! What I have to say about this is if an Error occures You should first type that Error Message in the Search Engine www.google.com And when there can be nothing found about that Error contact the List. Isn't there a Way to setup an additional List for more advanced People using qmail ? It would be really a very big Afford. Thanks a lot Folks! -- --^..^------ michael maier - system & development administrator flatfox ag, hanauer landstrasse 196a d-60314 frankfurt am main fon+49.(0)69.50 95 98-308 fax+49.(0)69.50 95 98-101 email [EMAIL PROTECTED] urlhttp://www.flatfox.com - m a k e m y d a y
Re: lets get back to the purpose of the mailing list
> What is so funny is that one of the people who was at the heart of this gave a > reason of haveing to pay for each message download. Well at least now I have > my $0.02 worth in :) rofl, you pay for Traffic? You must have been from Yesterday! ;-)) --^..^-- michael maier - system & development administrator flatfox ag, hanauer landstrasse 196a d-60314 frankfurt am main fon+49.(0)69.50 95 98-308 fax+49.(0)69.50 95 98-101 email [EMAIL PROTECTED] urlhttp://www.flatfox.com - m a k e m y d a y
Re: SMTP and PoP 3 problems
Andrew Buenaventura wrote: > re SMTP, this happens even if I am telneting from the linux box's loopback > address (127.0.0.1) > > re pop my problem is not the aliasing. my problem is that all the other > users can't access their mail. i think qmail divided my users 3 different > groups: > > 1. all users created when sendmail is still installed are able to retrieve > their mails using qmail > 2. users created after sendmail was removed can logon but can't see their > messages (i.e. i sent them a test message but nothing is reflected in their > Maildir) > 3. users created after i put Maildir under /etc/skel gets an authorization > failure error message when they log on to the pop server Got the same Problem because sendmail used /var/spool/mail/username What I did was running qmail with Mailbox Format and then doing a symlink... from /home/username/Mailbox to /var/spool/mail/username for eg. # ln -s /home/mmaier/Mailbox /var/spool/mail/mmaier It's not the best Solution but worked for me very good with System Accounts. --^..^-- michael maier - system & development administrator flatfox ag, hanauer landstrasse 196a d-60314 frankfurt am main fon+49.(0)69.50 95 98-308 fax+49.(0)69.50 95 98-101 email [EMAIL PROTECTED] urlhttp://www.flatfox.com - m a k e m y d a y
Re: SMTP and PoP 3 problems
Andrew Buenaventura wrote: > My problems are: > > 1. Why is it that when I telnet to the SMTP port, I get a connection closed > by foreign host error message? There can be several Reasons. 1) check /etc/hosts.deny 2) check /etc/inetd.conf 3) there is something going wrong with your smtp daemon and it died It could be no Firewall Problem because that would block completely... > 2. When I telnet to port 110, only my account (not root) is able to retrieve > mails. The others are able to logon but unable to retrieve their mails. > Also, all accounts I created after putting the Maildir to /etc/skel gets an > -ERR authorization failed error message. in qmail root is not able to check mail for security reasons! solve: # echo youraccountname > /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-root there is the same with .qmail-postmaster and .qmail-mailer-daemon for me eg. works: # echo mmaier > /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-root # echo mmaier > /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-postmaster # ln -s .qmail-postmaster /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-mailer-daemon > I removed sendmail before installing the qmail RPMs. Good! =) --^..^------ michael maier - system & development administrator flatfox ag, hanauer landstrasse 196a d-60314 frankfurt am main fon+49.(0)69.50 95 98-308 fax+49.(0)69.50 95 98-101 email [EMAIL PROTECTED] urlhttp://www.flatfox.com - m a k e m y d a y
Re: POP Mail
Isianto Istiadi wrote: > Hi, I'm using slackware 7.0, and I did successfully install the smtp and > qmail. But I found an obstacle (installing pop server). I downloaded > the checkpasswd.c (or something like that). But I can't successfully > compile it. Please help me and pardon my english try gcc -o checkpasswd -lcrypt -lcrypt means that the Crypt Library should be used to compile the C Program The crypt Lib is needed by checkpasswd --^..^---------- michael maier - system & development administrator flatfox ag, hanauer landstrasse 196a d-60314 frankfurt am main fon+49.(0)69.50 95 98-308 fax+49.(0)69.50 95 98-101 email [EMAIL PROTECTED] urlhttp://www.flatfox.com - m a k e m y d a y
Re: Strange 550 errors to ???
Jon Griffin wrote: > I have had my qmail setup for several years and just now have started to > notice that some recipients are returning: > 550 relaying mail to ... is not allowed. > This happens when a virtual user is relaying through my server and the > servername is not the same as the recipient. That's quite normal! You can use POP before SMTP Authentification so Virtual Users must check their e-Mail first. A Program on your Mail Server will then add the IP/Hostname to the List of People who are allowed to relay through your Server. You can also open whole Relay but that is not very wise because your Server will be listed then to the different Relay Blocking Lists on the Internet. If you don't have a Clue how to setup POP before SMTP http://www.octlabs.de/linux/docu/qmail_howto.shtml can maybe help you. I have written down there how I installed my Mail Server with POP before SMTP Stuff. With best Regards... --^..^------ michael maier - system & development administrator flatfox ag, hanauer landstrasse 196a d-60314 frankfurt am main fon+49.(0)69.50 95 98-308 fax+49.(0)69.50 95 98-101 email [EMAIL PROTECTED] urlhttp://www.flatfox.com - m a k e m y d a y
Re: Qmailanalog ...
Daniel POGAC wrote: > Can you help me with use qmail analog ??? I have installed qmailanalog and > have log file without time stamps... > > I think that i use incorrect syntaxes... I'm using the following very simple Script for general Mail Statistics: root@foxdev1:/usr/local/samba/lib> cat /usr/bin/mailstat #! /bin/sh /usr/local/bin/tai64nfrac < /var/log/qmail/qmail-send/current > /var/log/maillog /usr/local/qmailanalog/bin/matchup < /var/log/maillog > /var/log/maillog.matchup /usr/local/qmailanalog/bin/zoverall < /var/log/maillog.matchup rm -rf /var/log/maillog* -- --^..^---------- michael maier - system & development administrator flatfox ag, hanauer landstrasse 196a d-60314 frankfurt am main fon+49.(0)69.50 95 98-308 fax+49.(0)69.50 95 98-101 email [EMAIL PROTECTED] urlhttp://www.flatfox.com - m a k e m y d a y
451 qq Trouble creating files in Queue
Hi all! When I send out dozens of Messages I get that Error 451 qq Trouble creating files in Queue. I did already make setup check but it didn't help! So why is that Error occuring ? Can it be possible that my Hard Disk is to busy/slow Thanks in Advance, Michael!
Re: Wanting to move the qmail queue.
queue-fix will help you!! --^..^-- michael maier - system & development administrator flatfox ag, hanauer landstrasse 196a d-60314 frankfurt am main fon+49.(0)69.50 95 98-308 fax+49.(0)69.50 95 98-101 email [EMAIL PROTECTED] urlhttp://www.flatfox.com - m a k e m y d a y
Re: cc incoming mail
Kimberly Vher wrote: > How can i make a copy of incoming mail from one address to multiple address. > > I have in my home/vhernz/.qmail file > > ./Maildir/ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > so that i have a copy in my hotmail account. but i want to make a copy to > multiple address how can i do that? > > Thanks Just write all other Addresses below?!! in /home/vhernz/.qmail ./Maildir/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... -- CU, Michael!
Re: relay-ctrl does not work
Oliver Lehmann wrote: > Perhaps the used "checkpassword" is the Misstake? > All I get is: > > olivleh1@sina> telnet ernie 110 > Trying 192.168.168.100... > Connected to ernie.sesamestreet.net. > Escape character is '^]'. > +OK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > user olivleh1 > +OK > pass * > -ERR authorization failed > Connection closed by foreign host. > olivleh1@sina> > > Any Ideas? > > Yours > Olli In fact seems to be your checkpassword! I'm using http://www.whirlycott.com/phil/checkpoppasswd.c which you have to compile with gcc -o checkpassword checkpoppasswd.c -lcrypt To generate a Password use the following Perl Script... #!/usr/bin/perl -w print "Please enter a Word you wanna use as POP3 Password: "; $pass=; chomp($pass); print "Now enter a 2 Letter Salt Value: "; $salt=; chomp($salt); print "Generated Password is: "; print crypt($pass, $salt); print "\n"; For more Info check http://www.octlabs.de/linux/docu/qmail_howto.shtml --^..^-- michael maier - system & development administrator flatfox ag, hanauer landstrasse 196a d-60314 frankfurt am main fon+49.(0)69.50 95 98-308 fax+49.(0)69.50 95 98-101 email [EMAIL PROTECTED] urlhttp://www.flatfox.com - m a k e m y d a y
Re: Compiling problems?
Stian Brekmo wrote: > maildirwatch.c: In function `main': > maildirwatch.c:62: warning: return type of `main' is not `int' This is quite normal! That is because the main Function has Return Type void. CU, Michael --^..^------ michael maier - system & development administrator flatfox ag, hanauer landstrasse 196a d-60314 frankfurt am main fon+49.(0)69.50 95 98-308 fax+49.(0)69.50 95 98-101 email [EMAIL PROTECTED] urlhttp://www.flatfox.com - m a k e m y d a y
Re: Problem mit qmail-pop
Ruprecht Helms wrote: > -ERR this user has no $HOME/Maildir This means the User has no Mail Directory! Maildir => /home/$USER/Maildir The deeper Maildir Structure: Maildir/cur Maildir/new Maildir/tmp That Directories must be present and must have the working Rights to Access!! CU -- --^..^------ michael maier - system & development administrator flatfox ag, hanauer landstrasse 196a d-60314 frankfurt am main fon+49.(0)69.50 95 98-308 fax+49.(0)69.50 95 98-101 email [EMAIL PROTECTED] urlhttp://www.flatfox.com - m a k e m y d a y
Re: connections ???
tag wrote: > > Get qmail-analog mentioned on www.qmail.org > > CU, > > Michael! > > I have it - how is it going to help me ??? qmail-analog looks into your Log Files and provides Programs to show Statistics of your Mail Server.
Re: connections ???
tag wrote: > Hi ALL, > > In syslog i am getting alot of these: > > 973696609.774420 tcpserver: pid 16494 from > 973696609.776054 tcpserver: ok 16494 0::25 > :::4648 > 973696610.343762 tcpserver: end 16494 status 256 > > Please help ?? > > Thanks > Tonino Get qmail-analog mentioned on www.qmail.org CU, Michael!
Re: qmail and secure smtp relay?
What you mean is SMTP after POP so checkout http://www.octlabs.de/linux/docu/qmail_howto.shtml It has nothing to do with SSL so far!! CU, Michael..
Re: smtp-auth and smtp after pop
Hans-Juergen Schwarz wrote: > I agree with everybody of you. The problem is that the customer is a > reseller who is hosting quit a few domain on my server and he told > me he can´t do this thing to his customers, because they would not > like it. So I got to find a way to please him. I told my customer exactly the same > things but he will not hear anything about it. So I got the choice to find > a solution or he is going to an other provider. You can add the internal Network of the People in the tcprules File, too! CU, Michael..
Re: qmail + throttling (limit bandwidth)
Charles Cazabon wrote: > To reduce peak bandwidth usage, reduce your concurrencyremote value. There's > no way to specify something like "never go over 30kbps", but as a general > rule, if you reduce your concurrencyremote by half, your typical network > bandwidth will go down by a similar amount. Hmm, so I think the best would be to run 2 qmail Installation? (One for the normal e-Mails with high concurrency and one for the Mailing Lists with low concurrency) CU, Michael..
Re: Moving the qmail directory
Filip Salomonsson wrote: > If I move /var/qmail to /export/qmail, and replace it with a symbolic > link pointing to the new location, is there anything that might cause > things to explode into my face? Hmm, if you place symlink and then move nothing should happen. But to be sure I would wait until the queue is empty and then move so it's sure there will be no lost data! CU, Michael..
Re: smtp-auth and smtp after pop
Milen Petrinski wrote: > Yor problem is not with qmail setup, but the users. thay can get thair mail > befor sending outgoing messages, if they select "recieve" first from the > drop-down menu in right of the button - tell them to read the help. > > Milen Users must check before they can send out if your SMTP after POP3 works well! Your Relay Control Programm will then add the IP of the Mail Client to the Relaying Rules File. An additional Help for the Users is that you edit the Error Message in qmail-smtpd.c to one which tells them to check their Mail first before they can send out any. CU, Michael..
Re: Free documentation for beginners about mail server basis ?
"Robin S. Socha" wrote: > http://www.faqs.org/faqs/mail/ }:-> For qmail Beginners I did a good All Purpose Installation Mini HOWTO... http://www.octlabs.de/linux/docu/qmail_howto.shtml CU, Michael..
qmail + throttling (limit bandwidth)
How can I throttle the Bandwidth Usage with qmail ? I have High Volume Server sending 3 Mio. e-Mails / weekly out. My ISP bills in Bandwidth Consumation and that 3 Mio. e-Mails Send produce very high Bandwidth Usage Peeks!! Who can help? PS: I'm on Sun Solaris 7 Box -- With best Regards, Michael..
