Re: [qmailtoaster] heavy load for latest clamav and spamd?

[Erik A. Espinoza]

Changing to -h is probably a good idea.

Before SpamAssassin would do the reverse lookup if the MTA didn't. Now
that SpamAssassin relies on the MTA, it's no biggy.

E

On 8/10/07, L. A. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I use google for some search.
>
> I suppose you talk this about:
>
> http://www.nabble.com/-Bug-5586---New%3A-RDNS_NONE-has-false-positives-if-the-MTA-doesn't-put-the-hostname-in-the-Received-header-tf4221785.html
>
>
>
> Is perfomance decreasing badly if we enable rdns lookups in tcpserver 
> (tcpserver -h)?
>
>
>
> 09.08.07, 00:09, Philip Nix Guru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>
> > Hello
>
> > I have very busy smtp servers
>
> > using clamav 0.91.1
>
> > When I combined it with spamassassin-toaster-3.1.8-1.3.8 all is working
>
> > fine
>
> > When I did combine it with spamassassin-toaster-3.2.2-1.3.11 the
>
> > scanning time increased badly
>
> > and all mails got tagged with RDNS_NONE
>
> > The reason is :
>
> > There was a change in SA around 3.2.1 whereby it no longer relies on its
>
> > own code to do PTR lookups (rDNS) of the MTAs showing in the Received:
>
> > headers. Instead it relies on the local MTA to have done it and written
>
> > it into the header field.
>
> > By default *Qmail* doesn't do rDNS lookups (performance reasons), so you
>
> > need to change tcpserver to do them - which then makes SA happy again.
>
> > i.e. you want "tcpserver -h" instead of "tcpserver -H"
>
> > I have a lot of extra rules and for the performance I reverted back to
>
> > spamassassin-toaster-3.1.8-1.3.8 on a few of my smtps
>
> > Will do more tests over the weekend
>
> > Adam Cantwell wrote:
>
> > > L. A. wrote:
>
> > >> Is there anybody who try latest clamav 0.91.1 or spamassasin 3.2.2
>
> > >> that live on devel site under heavy load?
>
> > >>
>
> > >> I have load approx 1-3 messages per day at send or receive.
>
> > >> And clamav 0 88 and spamd 3.1.8 works great, but for now i saw that
>
> > >> clamd cannot use all viruses that freshclam download. So i want build
>
> > >> new qt with latest versions of clamav and spamd but i'am not shure,
>
> > >> because they stay long time on devel site.
>
> > >>
>
> > >> So is there somebody who have any problems on hi load servers with them?
>
> > >>
>
> > >
>
> > > First of all, 10,000 - 30,000 messages per day is not even close to
>
> > > what I consider "heavy load."  I manage a couple of qmailtoaster
>
> > > servers, one of which handles >200,000 messages per day and the other
>
> > > one more than twice that.  Even these I do not consider high load.
>
> > >
>
> > > I am currently running SA 3.2.1 and ClamAV 0.90.3 and have not had any
>
> > > issues at all with said load.
>
> > >
>
> > > I will be upgrading both of these machines tonight to the latest SA
>
> > > and clamav packages on the devel site.  I had been waiting for the new
>
> > > SA to show up there to do an upgrade.  Whenever I build a new QMT box,
>
> > > I always include whatever latest packages are on the devel site, and
>
> > > for the past two years that I have been using QMT I have not had any
>
> > > issues.
>
> > >
>
> > > Adam
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > > -
>
> > > QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
>
> > > -
>
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > >
>
> > -
>
> >  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
>
> > -
>
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -
>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] heavy load for latest clamav and spamd?

[L. A.]

I use google for some search.

I suppose you talk this about:

http://www.nabble.com/-Bug-5586---New%3A-RDNS_NONE-has-false-positives-if-the-MTA-doesn't-put-the-hostname-in-the-Received-header-tf4221785.html



Is perfomance decreasing badly if we enable rdns lookups in tcpserver 
(tcpserver -h)?



09.08.07, 00:09, Philip Nix Guru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:



> Hello

> I have very busy smtp servers

> using clamav 0.91.1

> When I combined it with spamassassin-toaster-3.1.8-1.3.8 all is working 

> fine

> When I did combine it with spamassassin-toaster-3.2.2-1.3.11 the 

> scanning time increased badly

> and all mails got tagged with RDNS_NONE

> The reason is :

> There was a change in SA around 3.2.1 whereby it no longer relies on its

> own code to do PTR lookups (rDNS) of the MTAs showing in the Received:

> headers. Instead it relies on the local MTA to have done it and written

> it into the header field.

> By default *Qmail* doesn't do rDNS lookups (performance reasons), so you

> need to change tcpserver to do them - which then makes SA happy again.

> i.e. you want "tcpserver -h" instead of "tcpserver -H"

> I have a lot of extra rules and for the performance I reverted back to 

> spamassassin-toaster-3.1.8-1.3.8 on a few of my smtps

> Will do more tests over the weekend

> Adam Cantwell wrote:

> > L. A. wrote:

> >> Is there anybody who try latest clamav 0.91.1 or spamassasin 3.2.2 

> >> that live on devel site under heavy load?

> >>

> >> I have load approx 1-3 messages per day at send or receive. 

> >> And clamav 0 88 and spamd 3.1.8 works great, but for now i saw that 

> >> clamd cannot use all viruses that freshclam download. So i want build 

> >> new qt with latest versions of clamav and spamd but i'am not shure, 

> >> because they stay long time on devel site.

> >>

> >> So is there somebody who have any problems on hi load servers with them?

> >>

> >

> > First of all, 10,000 - 30,000 messages per day is not even close to 

> > what I consider "heavy load."  I manage a couple of qmailtoaster 

> > servers, one of which handles >200,000 messages per day and the other 

> > one more than twice that.  Even these I do not consider high load.

> >

> > I am currently running SA 3.2.1 and ClamAV 0.90.3 and have not had any 

> > issues at all with said load.

> >

> > I will be upgrading both of these machines tonight to the latest SA 

> > and clamav packages on the devel site.  I had been waiting for the new 

> > SA to show up there to do an upgrade.  Whenever I build a new QMT box, 

> > I always include whatever latest packages are on the devel site, and 

> > for the past two years that I have been using QMT I have not had any 

> > issues.

> >

> > Adam

> >

> >

> > -

> > QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 

> > -

> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> >

> -

>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 

> -

> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [qmailtoaster] Disabling DomainKeys not working?

[Peter Wu]

Thanks, I'll try.


Best regards,

Peter Wu

-Original Message-
From: Andreas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 4:04 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Disabling DomainKeys not working?

Hi Yi-Lei,

just delete the directorys with the domainkeys, usually
under /var/qmail/control/domainkeys for the concerned domains.
Do not forget to adjust your DNS-settings on the Nameserver.

Bye
Andreas
Am Donnerstag, den 09.08.2007, 15:43 +0800 schrieb Yi-Lei Wu:
> Hi list,
> 
> A lot of my domains are getting rejected mails with the following
> messages after I upgraded my Qmail lately:
> 
> qmail-smtpd: qq hard reject (DomainKeys verify status: bad format
> (#5.3.0)):
> 
> I searched the list and found the advice to disable the domainkeys,
> and I followed these steps: 
> 
> cd /var/qmail/bin
> ln -sf qmail-queue.orig qmail-queue 
> 
> And then restart qmail:
> 
> qmailctl restart
> 
> However, I am still getting the same reject message, does anyone know
> how to resolve this?
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> 
> Peter Wu


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] mail accepted to nonexistent user

[Lucian Cristian]

Lucian Cristian wrote:

Lucian Cristian wrote:

Johannes Weberhofer, Weberhofer GmbH wrote:
Are you forwarding mails to non-existing users to a default 
mail-address - is one of the a "catch all account"?


Johannes

Lucian Cristian schrieb:

hi everyone,

recently while I was monitoring some mail deliveries I saw this 
thing happening:

using tai64nlocal for local time

smtp/current:

2007-08-10 16:36:17.860683500 CHKUSER accepted sender: from 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote 
<235-194-218-83.globnet.md:unknown:83.218.194.235> rcpt <> : sender 
accepted
2007-08-10 16:36:21.306076500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote 
<235-194-218-83.globnet.md:unknown:83.218.194.235> rcpt 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : found existing recipient
2007-08-10 16:36:24.125363500 simscan:[25035]:CLEAN 
(7.90/9.00):2.6938s:***SPAM*** 
GlobalTrading-dorel:83.218.194.235:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: 


2007-08-10 16:36:24.782902500 tcpserver: end 25035 status 0
2007-08-10 16:36:24.782984500 tcpserver: status: 0/100


send/current:


2007-08-10 16:36:24.383907500 new msg 836212
2007-08-10 16:36:24.383916500 info msg 836212: bytes 14648 from 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 25124 uid 89
2007-08-10 16:36:24.400349500 starting delivery 25: msg 836212 to 
local [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2007-08-10 16:36:24.400487500 status: local 1/10 remote 0/60
2007-08-10 16:36:24.454209500 delivery 25: success: did_0+0+1/
2007-08-10 16:36:24.454217500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/60
2007-08-10 16:36:24.454221500 end msg 836212


the user dorel does not exist, also I've done a grep in domain 
createc.ro for GlobalTrading and I couldn't fine anything related 
to user dorel. I also verified the vpopmail database.


should I monitor the server for open relays ?

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




I forgot to mention that I don't have a catch all account, i'll 
search all domains and see it I haven't set up one by mistake.

it seems to be only logical explanation.
thanks !

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

It seems the domain is accepting all mails even if catch all is not 
enabled in qmailadmin. I've moved this domain from some centos 5 
server. maybe something got messed up.

i'll reset the domain.
thanks !

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

now I remember to have pressed "set catchall email deleted" onetime now 
I've set it back to set catchall bounecd*

*

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] mail accepted to nonexistent user

[Lucian Cristian]

Lucian Cristian wrote:

Johannes Weberhofer, Weberhofer GmbH wrote:
Are you forwarding mails to non-existing users to a default 
mail-address - is one of the a "catch all account"?


Johannes

Lucian Cristian schrieb:

hi everyone,

recently while I was monitoring some mail deliveries I saw this 
thing happening:

using tai64nlocal for local time

smtp/current:

2007-08-10 16:36:17.860683500 CHKUSER accepted sender: from 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote 
<235-194-218-83.globnet.md:unknown:83.218.194.235> rcpt <> : sender 
accepted
2007-08-10 16:36:21.306076500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote 
<235-194-218-83.globnet.md:unknown:83.218.194.235> rcpt 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : found existing recipient
2007-08-10 16:36:24.125363500 simscan:[25035]:CLEAN 
(7.90/9.00):2.6938s:***SPAM*** 
GlobalTrading-dorel:83.218.194.235:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: 


2007-08-10 16:36:24.782902500 tcpserver: end 25035 status 0
2007-08-10 16:36:24.782984500 tcpserver: status: 0/100


send/current:


2007-08-10 16:36:24.383907500 new msg 836212
2007-08-10 16:36:24.383916500 info msg 836212: bytes 14648 from 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 25124 uid 89
2007-08-10 16:36:24.400349500 starting delivery 25: msg 836212 to 
local [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2007-08-10 16:36:24.400487500 status: local 1/10 remote 0/60
2007-08-10 16:36:24.454209500 delivery 25: success: did_0+0+1/
2007-08-10 16:36:24.454217500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/60
2007-08-10 16:36:24.454221500 end msg 836212


the user dorel does not exist, also I've done a grep in domain 
createc.ro for GlobalTrading and I couldn't fine anything related to 
user dorel. I also verified the vpopmail database.


should I monitor the server for open relays ?

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




I forgot to mention that I don't have a catch all account, i'll search 
all domains and see it I haven't set up one by mistake.

it seems to be only logical explanation.
thanks !

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

It seems the domain is accepting all mails even if catch all is not 
enabled in qmailadmin. I've moved this domain from some centos 5 server. 
maybe something got messed up.

i'll reset the domain.
thanks !

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] mail accepted to nonexistent user

[Lucian Cristian]

Johannes Weberhofer, Weberhofer GmbH wrote:
Are you forwarding mails to non-existing users to a default 
mail-address - is one of the a "catch all account"?


Johannes

Lucian Cristian schrieb:

hi everyone,

recently while I was monitoring some mail deliveries I saw this thing 
happening:

using tai64nlocal for local time

smtp/current:

2007-08-10 16:36:17.860683500 CHKUSER accepted sender: from 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote 
<235-194-218-83.globnet.md:unknown:83.218.194.235> rcpt <> : sender 
accepted
2007-08-10 16:36:21.306076500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote 
<235-194-218-83.globnet.md:unknown:83.218.194.235> rcpt 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : found existing recipient
2007-08-10 16:36:24.125363500 simscan:[25035]:CLEAN 
(7.90/9.00):2.6938s:***SPAM*** 
GlobalTrading-dorel:83.218.194.235:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: 


2007-08-10 16:36:24.782902500 tcpserver: end 25035 status 0
2007-08-10 16:36:24.782984500 tcpserver: status: 0/100


send/current:


2007-08-10 16:36:24.383907500 new msg 836212
2007-08-10 16:36:24.383916500 info msg 836212: bytes 14648 from 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 25124 uid 89
2007-08-10 16:36:24.400349500 starting delivery 25: msg 836212 to 
local [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2007-08-10 16:36:24.400487500 status: local 1/10 remote 0/60
2007-08-10 16:36:24.454209500 delivery 25: success: did_0+0+1/
2007-08-10 16:36:24.454217500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/60
2007-08-10 16:36:24.454221500 end msg 836212


the user dorel does not exist, also I've done a grep in domain 
createc.ro for GlobalTrading and I couldn't fine anything related to 
user dorel. I also verified the vpopmail database.


should I monitor the server for open relays ?

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



I forgot to mention that I don't have a catch all account, i'll search 
all domains and see it I haven't set up one by mistake.

it seems to be only logical explanation.
thanks !

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] mail accepted to nonexistent user

[Johannes Weberhofer, Weberhofer GmbH]

Are you forwarding mails to non-existing users to a default mail-address - is one of the 
a "catch all account"?

Johannes

Lucian Cristian schrieb:

hi everyone,

recently while I was monitoring some mail deliveries I saw this thing 
happening:

using tai64nlocal for local time

smtp/current:

2007-08-10 16:36:17.860683500 CHKUSER accepted sender: from 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote 
<235-194-218-83.globnet.md:unknown:83.218.194.235> rcpt <> : sender 
accepted
2007-08-10 16:36:21.306076500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote 
<235-194-218-83.globnet.md:unknown:83.218.194.235> rcpt 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : found existing recipient
2007-08-10 16:36:24.125363500 simscan:[25035]:CLEAN 
(7.90/9.00):2.6938s:***SPAM*** 
GlobalTrading-dorel:83.218.194.235:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: 


2007-08-10 16:36:24.782902500 tcpserver: end 25035 status 0
2007-08-10 16:36:24.782984500 tcpserver: status: 0/100


send/current:


2007-08-10 16:36:24.383907500 new msg 836212
2007-08-10 16:36:24.383916500 info msg 836212: bytes 14648 from 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 25124 uid 89
2007-08-10 16:36:24.400349500 starting delivery 25: msg 836212 to local 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2007-08-10 16:36:24.400487500 status: local 1/10 remote 0/60
2007-08-10 16:36:24.454209500 delivery 25: success: did_0+0+1/
2007-08-10 16:36:24.454217500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/60
2007-08-10 16:36:24.454221500 end msg 836212


the user dorel does not exist, also I've done a grep in domain 
createc.ro for GlobalTrading and I couldn't fine anything related to 
user dorel. I also verified the vpopmail database.


should I monitor the server for open relays ?

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



--


|-
|  weberhofer GmbH   | Johannes Weberhofer
|  information technologies
|  Austria, 1080 Wien, Blindengasse 52/3
|--->>

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] re-install qmail

[Lucian Cristian]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
since i've done the upgrade i've had systematic failures with multiple 
parts of qmail.  is there a way to re-install through the script 
without having to remove each rpm and dumping the qmail folders?


I was dumb enough not to backup all the config files, but then again 
this is a home "test" box.


-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

you could try backing up your current install, install a new one and 
from current backup to keep only mysql database, vpopmail dir and 
manualy copy files from qmail control dir and resore over new installed 
qmail.


-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[qmailtoaster] re-install qmail

[ldwraith]

since i've done the upgrade i've had systematic failures with multiple  
parts of qmail.  is there a way to re-install through the script  
without having to remove each rpm and dumping the qmail folders?


I was dumb enough not to backup all the config files, but then again  
this is a home "test" box.


-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Is this still a valid list

[PakOgah]

So, all of these perl package need to be installed if we are going to 
use SA ver 3.2.x ?


Kyle Quillen wrote:

Thanks Guys,

I installed everything on this list with out a hitch 


Thanks
Q


-Original Message-
From: Erik A. Espinoza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 3:57 PM

To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Is this still a valid list

RPMForge works better and catches things that CPAN doesn't.

Make sure these packages are installed with RPMForge:
perl perl-URI perl-Digest-HMAC perl-Net-Ident perl-Net-CIDR-Lite
perl-Socket6 perl-Razor-Agent perl-IP-Country perl-Error perl-TimeDate
perl-NetAddr-IP perl-version perl-Compress-Zlib perl-Mail-DomainKeys
perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA perl-Archive-Tar
perl-IO-Socket-SSL perl-Net-SSLeay perl-PlRPC perl-HTML-Tagset
perl-Net-DNS perl-Filter perl-Digest-SHA1 perl-Time-HiRes
perl-Sys-Hostname-Long perl-Mail-SPF-Query
perl-LWP-UserAgent-Determined perl-IO-Socket-INET6
perl-Geography-Countries perl-IO-Zlib perl-HTML-Parser perl-DBD-MySQL
perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA perl-Digest-SHA perl-Encode-Detect
perl-Mail-SPF perl-Mail-DKIM perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random perl-MailTools
perl-Net-Daemon perl-DBI perl-Net-IP perl-libwww-perl

Thanks,
Erik

On 8/9/07, Todd W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  

From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>




Of perl modules that need installed?

I pulled this from an email back on the 7th of January

I don't think I have the time or energy to handle rpm's for every perl
module used by SpamAssassin for every distribution we support.

For those that can, use RPMForge, for those distros not covered you'll
have to use CPAN.
  

Theres a script that installs all the modules for you via perl's CPAN:

wget http://www.qmailtoaster.com/centos/cnt40/cnt40-perl.sh
sh cnt40-perl.sh

You can run it on anything that has a cpan shell (basically anything that
has perl on it).





-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[qmailtoaster] mail accepted to nonexistent user

[Lucian Cristian]

hi everyone,

recently while I was monitoring some mail deliveries I saw this thing 
happening:

using tai64nlocal for local time

smtp/current:

2007-08-10 16:36:17.860683500 CHKUSER accepted sender: from 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote 
<235-194-218-83.globnet.md:unknown:83.218.194.235> rcpt <> : sender accepted
2007-08-10 16:36:21.306076500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote 
<235-194-218-83.globnet.md:unknown:83.218.194.235> rcpt 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : found existing recipient
2007-08-10 16:36:24.125363500 simscan:[25035]:CLEAN 
(7.90/9.00):2.6938s:***SPAM*** 
GlobalTrading-dorel:83.218.194.235:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:

2007-08-10 16:36:24.782902500 tcpserver: end 25035 status 0
2007-08-10 16:36:24.782984500 tcpserver: status: 0/100


send/current:


2007-08-10 16:36:24.383907500 new msg 836212
2007-08-10 16:36:24.383916500 info msg 836212: bytes 14648 from 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 25124 uid 89
2007-08-10 16:36:24.400349500 starting delivery 25: msg 836212 to local 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2007-08-10 16:36:24.400487500 status: local 1/10 remote 0/60
2007-08-10 16:36:24.454209500 delivery 25: success: did_0+0+1/
2007-08-10 16:36:24.454217500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/60
2007-08-10 16:36:24.454221500 end msg 836212


the user dorel does not exist, also I've done a grep in domain 
createc.ro for GlobalTrading and I couldn't fine anything related to 
user dorel. I also verified the vpopmail database.


should I monitor the server for open relays ?

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [qmailtoaster] Is this still a valid list

[Kyle Quillen]

Thanks Guys,

I installed everything on this list with out a hitch 

Thanks
Q


-Original Message-
From: Erik A. Espinoza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 3:57 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Is this still a valid list

RPMForge works better and catches things that CPAN doesn't.

Make sure these packages are installed with RPMForge:
perl perl-URI perl-Digest-HMAC perl-Net-Ident perl-Net-CIDR-Lite
perl-Socket6 perl-Razor-Agent perl-IP-Country perl-Error perl-TimeDate
perl-NetAddr-IP perl-version perl-Compress-Zlib perl-Mail-DomainKeys
perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA perl-Archive-Tar
perl-IO-Socket-SSL perl-Net-SSLeay perl-PlRPC perl-HTML-Tagset
perl-Net-DNS perl-Filter perl-Digest-SHA1 perl-Time-HiRes
perl-Sys-Hostname-Long perl-Mail-SPF-Query
perl-LWP-UserAgent-Determined perl-IO-Socket-INET6
perl-Geography-Countries perl-IO-Zlib perl-HTML-Parser perl-DBD-MySQL
perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA perl-Digest-SHA perl-Encode-Detect
perl-Mail-SPF perl-Mail-DKIM perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random perl-MailTools
perl-Net-Daemon perl-DBI perl-Net-IP perl-libwww-perl

Thanks,
Erik

On 8/9/07, Todd W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> > Of perl modules that need installed?
> >
> > I pulled this from an email back on the 7th of January
> >
> > I don't think I have the time or energy to handle rpm's for every perl
> > module used by SpamAssassin for every distribution we support.
> >
> > For those that can, use RPMForge, for those distros not covered you'll
> > have to use CPAN.
>
> Theres a script that installs all the modules for you via perl's CPAN:
>
> wget http://www.qmailtoaster.com/centos/cnt40/cnt40-perl.sh
> sh cnt40-perl.sh
>
> You can run it on anything that has a cpan shell (basically anything that
> has perl on it).
>
> trwww
>
>
> -
>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Limit specific users to domains

[A M]

2007/8/10, seekuel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hello people,
>
> Is there a way to limit users sending emails to a specific domain? for
> example:
>
> user1 can send mails to domain1, domain2, domain3, and domain4 only and
> cannot send mails to all other domains.
>
> user2 can only send mails to domain4 and domain2 only and cannot send
> mails to all other domain.
>
> user3 can only send mails to domain5 only and cannot send mails to all
> other domains.
>
> Is this possible with the toaster?
>
> Thank you,
>
> Sandeil
>
> --
> Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers
> from
> someone who knows.
> Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
>
>
Hi,

Yes theres is. You have to apply  empf. Search the list for a pacth I posted
a while ago.


-- 
AM
agmsoft(at)gmail.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] bulk mail and whitelist services

[PakOgah]

Todd W wrote:

Hi,

I need to provide a non minimal service level to verify the big 
webmail services accept mail as non-bulk.


So far I've only suceeded with AOL. Hotmail, Yahoo, and Google mark 
the mail as bulk.


Now, I'm only somewhat of a sysadmin but I'm good enough to earn money 
as one, and I have spent a signifigant amount of time on this task. I 
have set up SPF and DomainKeys, and double and triple checked them 
against the various testing tools out on the web. Heck, I can send a 
mail to yahoo, log in yahoo's webmail, and it says in bold letters, 
right in the bulk mail box, that "The sender has been verified by 
domainkeys!" So why is the email in the bulk mail folder?!?


So I've seen that between goodmail and sender score certified, I can 
buy my way on to a whitelists to deal with this problem. And really, 
this is where I'm at now. I dont send a lot of mail, so thier low end 
services arent out of reach if they really provide the service they 
say they do.


I ask the list: is it possible to get the big webmail providers to not 
mark the email without bribing them? What are your experiences? I've 
pretty much read the entire mailing list, and I haven't seen anything 
that answers my questions so far.


Thank you so much for qmail-toaster it is one awsome setup. Everything 
is so EASY!


Regards,

trwww



Once, email from my QMT is in Yahoo bulk folder but I forgot what I do.
I never contact Yahoo Admin.
and I dont know if it make sense or not, but did you configure reverse 
DNS for your mailserver IP?



-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamassasin scan Spam PDF attach

[PakOgah]

PakOgah wrote:

PakOgah wrote:

Extract from Securityfocus...


Hi,


The @Mail dev team have created a module for spamassassin which uses 
the
sa engine to scan the content of PDF attachments and append the spam 
score

to the score of the email message -- and it WORKS!


http://blog.atmail.com/?p=61
http://freshmeat.net/projects/pdfassassin/



installation seems very easy but I miss the requirement pdftotext
do you have it on your qmt?
I dont have it. can I do
yum install xpdf to get pdftotext ?
or is there any binary for centos ? (really hate compiling from source)

for gocr already installed when installing fuzzyocr
  

Hi Anatoly Alexei Pedemonte Ku,
now pdfassassin installed is installed on my qmt but when I monitor 
spamd log
it display error "Undefined subroutine &Pdf::clean_pdf_tmp called at 
/etc/mail/spamassassin/Pdf.pm line 122"

if the message has pdf attached
and on /tmp folder I found many 2-3 days old spamassassin.pdf.* files 
lying there, not deleted by SA

did you experience the same problem ??

any body has use it ?


fyi respond from pdfassassins' author:

Hello PakOgah,

There was a bug in the first version of PDFassassin regarding the 
clean_pdf_tmp subroutine.  This has been fixed.   Please re-download 
from the same location:


http://atmail.com/members/Pdf.tgz 


Best Regards,

Corey Bissaillon
VP Sales & Business Development
CalaCode USA
Direct: 773.451.8334 x102 | FAX: 720.528.8186
Total @Mail Solution: http://appliance.atmail.com/


-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Limit specific users to domains

[PakOgah]

seekuel wrote:

Hello people,

Is there a way to limit users sending emails to a specific domain? for 
example:


user1 can send mails to domain1, domain2, domain3, and domain4 only 
and cannot send mails to all other domains.


user2 can only send mails to domain4 and domain2 only and cannot send 
mails to all other domain.


user3 can only send mails to domain5 only and cannot send mails to all 
other domains.


Is this possible with the toaster?

Thank you,

Sandeil



some say you can use empf
detail info here http://inter7.com/?page=empf


-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[qmailtoaster] Limit specific users to domains

[seekuel]

Hello people,

Is there a way to limit users sending emails to a specific domain? for example:

user1 can send mails to domain1, domain2, domain3, and domain4 only and cannot 
send mails to all other domains.

user2 can only send mails to domain4 and domain2 only and cannot send mails to 
all other domain.

user3 can only send mails to domain5 only and cannot send mails to all other 
domains.

Is this possible with the toaster?

Thank you,

Sandeil
 
   
-
Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows.
Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.