[qmailtoaster] Clamd and spamassassin-toaster can we stop these
Dear List, I am having a server in which Qmtiso 1.4.0 is installed. In this version of iso, the clamd and spamassassin-toaster are out dated. I am having a Spamtitan server which filters all mails to my qmail server. So i dont need the clamd and spamassassin-toaster to filter my mails. Is there any way to stop these two. Because clamd is taking 100% of cpu. Some times server is not accepting tha mails to send. But the ports 587 and 110 are open. I am attaching the setup of the servers with this mail. Thanks and Regards, S.Senthilvel, Doc1.doc Description: MS-Word document - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Authentication to bypass spam checks
Tek Support wrote: Thanks Eric, I realize I don't need 587 at all with spamdyke, I was trying to ask if I needed 587 if spamdyke was using spamhaus. Since spamhaus used by itself was causing rejections to my at home dynamic users it seemed strange that spamhaus was blocking my dynamic users but it was not blocking them when run with spamdyke. Since I don't fully understand the internals, I was asking about that specifically so I don't screw up my at home users. Let me see if I can explain this. You don't need port 587 with spamdyke because spamdyke turns off all of its filtering if the connection (sender) authenticates successfully. On the other hand, rblsmtpd is oblivious to authentication, so it rejects connections which might otherwise be able to authenticate. It's simply a weakness in the rblsmtpd program. And I believe it is true, that if I have dynamic IP users, and I'm using spamhaus by itself, then I do require port 587. Isn't that true? Not exactly. It's the combination of rblsmtpd and spamhaus which requires you to use port 587. spamhaus with spamdyke is ok on port 25. So it's more the case of the use of rblsmtpd (with certain blocklists which block dynamic addresses) which requires the use of port 587. And again if I have dynamic IP users, and I'm using spamdyke which includes spamhaus, then I don't need to use 587. Is that right? Yes, for the most part. I hate to split hairs, but in this case it might be appropriate. Regarding for the most part, spamdyke doesn't necessarily (or really) include spamhaus. If you'd have said I'm using spamdyke *with* spamhaus, that would be (slightly) clearer. You can use spamdyke with or without spamhaus (or any other RBL). Using spamhaus (and a few others) is highly recommended though. Thanks again, I'm just trying to be clear. No problem. I hope I can help you understand how it works. John On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Eric Shubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tek Support wrote: So if I understand correctly, spamdyke can use spamhaus, and I do see it in my /etc/spamdyke/spamdyke.conf file (uncommented). Which means I don't need the BLACKLIST= in my run file, is this correct? Yes. Spamdyke does everything that rblsmtpd used to do (and a lot more). And if I might ask a followup question, it was said in another post that spamdyke allows authenticated users in past spamhaus. Ok, but if spamdyke allows authenticated users in, while using spamhaus, then why do I need port 587? You don't need port 587 if you're using spamdyke. You do need port 587 if you're not using spamdyke. And just out of curiosity, if spamdyke is a more versitile product, allowing my dynamic users to authenticate and send mail on port 25 while also using spamhaus dynamic blocking, why isn't spamdyke installed by default? spamdyke is fairly new to the toaster. I expect that it will become part of the stock toaster at some point, but that's up to Erik Espinoza, who is the toaster maintainer. Thanks John On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Eric Shubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sam Clippinger wrote: To answer #1, spamdyke will definitely use Spamhaus' DNS RBLs. The default configuration of spamdyke (as installed by QTP) does not include Spamhaus, however. I beg your pardon. ;) Here are the default RBLs as installed by QTP: check-dnsrbl=zen.spamhaus.org check-dnsrbl=bl.spamcop.net check-dnsrbl=list.dsbl.org If you are using spamdyke version 3.1.x, edit the configuration file /etc/spamdyke/spamdyke.conf and add the following line: check-dnsrbl=zen.spamhaus.org If you are using spamdyke version 4.x, edit the configuration file /etc/spamdyke/spamdyke.conf and add the following line: dns-blacklist-entry=zen.spamhaus.org To add multiple DNS RBLs, simply repeat the line with different values. -- Sam Clippinger QTP only installs/upgrades spamdyke 3.1.x at this time. I hope to add 4.x capability soon. It'll likely be a couple weeks before I get to it though. Anil Aliyan wrote: pretty smart question John, I also would like to hear the answer for it from the experts. - Original Message - From: Tek Support [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, August 08, 2008 8:37 AM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Authentication to bypass spam checks Hi all, I have a few question. Before I learned of this port 587, my only option was to disable spamhaus. And all I did to disable it was to remove it from my /var/qmail/control/blacklists file. So, the other day I needed some addition reporting and I remembered the toaster plus, so I downloaded the Repo and ran the yum install for it. I then also decided to run the spamdyke filter. So, now that I've realized that port 587 is available for my users to send on, I went back to add the spamhaus. However, it's no longer in the /var/qmail/supervise/smtp/run file. It would appear that spamdyke has removed it. So I have 2 questions:
Re: [qmailtoaster] Clamd and spamassassin-toaster can we stop these
senthil vel wrote: Dear List, I am having a server in which Qmtiso 1.4.0 is installed. In this version of iso, the clamd and spamassassin-toaster are out dated. I am having a Spamtitan server which filters all mails to my qmail server. So i dont need the clamd and spamassassin-toaster to filter my mails. Is there any way to stop these two. Because clamd is taking 100% of cpu. Some times server is not accepting tha mails to send. But the ports 587 and 110 are open. I am attaching the setup of the servers with this mail. Thanks and Regards, S.Senthilvel, Modify settings in /var/qmail/control/simcontrol appropriately (change yes to no), then run # qmailctl cdb You might need to kill a clamd process that doesn't terminate. I'm not sure about that. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Clamd and spamassassin-toaster can we stop these
The big problem is when we are sending mail through the webinter face, (nuts mail), It is telling that Requested action aborted: error in processing Server replied: 451 mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0) Is the problem is with clam and spam or something else...? Thanks in advance, S.Senthilvel, On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Eric Shubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: senthil vel wrote: Dear List, I am having a server in which Qmtiso 1.4.0 is installed. In this version of iso, the clamd and spamassassin-toaster are out dated. I am having a Spamtitan server which filters all mails to my qmail server. So i dont need the clamd and spamassassin-toaster to filter my mails. Is there any way to stop these two. Because clamd is taking 100% of cpu. Some times server is not accepting tha mails to send. But the ports 587 and 110 are open. I am attaching the setup of the servers with this mail. Thanks and Regards, S.Senthilvel, Modify settings in /var/qmail/control/simcontrol appropriately (change yes to no), then run # qmailctl cdb You might need to kill a clamd process that doesn't terminate. I'm not sure about that. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] QMAILtoaster upgrade fails
I have installed qmailtoaster-plus sucessfully, but when I run qtp-newmodel I receive the following error message chroot: cannot run command `qtp-build-rpms': No such file or directory. Does anyone have any ideas? _ Get Windows Live and get whatever you need, wherever you are. Start here. http://www.windowslive.com/default.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_Home_082008
[qmailtoaster] SMTP-auth in qmail
Hi to all , i would like to ask inputs from anyone who have tried smtp-auth in qmail smtp server , my existing setup is this AV-SA-server(qmailtoaster) --POP server(QMAIL) right now email accounts is in the pop server while AV-SA server is configured only for scanning function/ What can be done to implement smtp auth in this setup ? Thanks, Manny
[qmailtoaster] Ticketing System
Hi list, I have planned to implement a ticket tracking system. While searching in google i got the following link. http://phpsupport.jynx.net It will also support qmail also it seems. The installation manual tells like following Last step is setting up your email gateway. If your using qmail, simply edit your .qmail-support for the domain you wish to be your gateway. Add this line to your dot-qmail. | /your/path/to/openticket.pl What exactly we should do in our QMT? Or is there any other ticket tracking softwares which are more compatible to QMT? Thanks a lot in advance . Thanks and Regards, S.Senthilvel, - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Clamd and spamassassin-toaster can we stop these
The only problem per se is that your cpu is running constantly, and slowing everything down considerably. Did that clamav come back after you rebooted? If so I guess you'll need to upgrade clamav-toaster, even though you're not actually using it. I'm not sure what exactly is wrong with that version that causes clamav to eat the cpu. Upgrading is a lot simpler than trying to remove clamav entirely. senthil vel wrote: Thanks Eric, after editing the /var/qmail/control/simcontrol as follows, :clam=no,spam=no,spam_hits=12,attach=.mp3:.src:.bat:.pif The mails are going out without any problem. I checked both from webinterface and outlook. But the server load is load average: 1.01, 1.03, 0.85 Cpu(s): 99.3% us, 0.3% sy, 0.0% ni, 0.0% id, 0.0% wa, 0.3% hi, 0.0% si Mem:514400k total, 285764k used, 228636k free,11944k buffers Swap: 779144k total,0k used, 779144k free,99076k cached For an uptime 'up 26 min' PID USER PR NI VIRTRES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND 2576 clamav25 0 51748 45m 1268 R 99.9 9.0 2 6:17.64 clamd Will it cause some problem in long run? Thanks and Regards, S.Senthilvel, On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 8:38 PM, senthil vel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The big problem is when we are sending mail through the webinter face, (nuts mail), It is telling that Requested action aborted: error in processing Server replied: 451 mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0) Is the problem is with clam and spam or something else...? Thanks in advance, S.Senthilvel, On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Eric Shubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: senthil vel wrote: Dear List, I am having a server in which Qmtiso 1.4.0 is installed. In this version of iso, the clamd and spamassassin-toaster are out dated. I am having a Spamtitan server which filters all mails to my qmail server. So i dont need the clamd and spamassassin-toaster to filter my mails. Is there any way to stop these two. Because clamd is taking 100% of cpu. Some times server is not accepting tha mails to send. But the ports 587 and 110 are open. I am attaching the setup of the servers with this mail. Thanks and Regards, S.Senthilvel, Modify settings in /var/qmail/control/simcontrol appropriately (change yes to no), then run # qmailctl cdb You might need to kill a clamd process that doesn't terminate. I'm not sure about that. -- -Eric 'shubes' -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] QMAILtoaster upgrade fails
James Ecker wrote: I have installed qmailtoaster-plus sucessfully, but when I run qtp-newmodel I receive the following error message chroot: cannot run command `qtp-build-rpms': No such file or directory. Does anyone have any ideas? That's unusual. Need more info to tell for sure, like distro version, toaster versions. If I had to guess, I'd say you're running an older kernel (2.6.9 or so) and you tried using a unionfs sandbox. If that's the case, I'd either upgrade to a newer kernel, or run qtp-newmodel with a copied or linked sandbox. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] SMTP-auth in qmail
mailing wrote: Hi to all , i would like to ask inputs from anyone who have tried smtp-auth in qmail smtp server , my existing setup is this AV-SA-server(qmailtoaster) --POP server(QMAIL) right now email accounts is in the pop server while AV-SA server is configured only for scanning function/ What can be done to implement smtp auth in this setup ? Thanks, Manny In qmailtoaster, smtp-auth is implemented on port 25, but not required. smtp-auth is required on port 587. You really shouldn't need to do anything to the toaster to implement smtp-auth. Simply configure your clients to use it. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Ticketing System
Hi, I need to let you know up front that I'm not one of the qmail masters on here, nor do I know your phpsupport program. But, a file called '.qmail-support' suggests that you have or need to create an email user called [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Then you'll have or need to create the file called .qmail-support. In my installations, there are no .qmail-username files created automatically. When you create it, put it in the same directory as your .qmail-default. A .qmail-username file is used to process other commands for that one email account only. And not for everyone. So with some users, they may not have a .qmail-username. But for this program, you would create .qmail-support and put the lines into it as suggested by that program. Also, their instructions you listed, presume that your ticketing support program is installed on the same server as your qmail. Thanks John On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 11:18 AM, senthil vel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi list, I have planned to implement a ticket tracking system. While searching in google i got the following link. http://phpsupport.jynx.net It will also support qmail also it seems. The installation manual tells like following Last step is setting up your email gateway. If your using qmail, simply edit your .qmail-support for the domain you wish to be your gateway. Add this line to your dot-qmail. | /your/path/to/openticket.pl What exactly we should do in our QMT? Or is there any other ticket tracking softwares which are more compatible to QMT? Thanks a lot in advance . Thanks and Regards, S.Senthilvel, - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Authentication to bypass spam checks
Eric, thank you that helps and I understand the process better - at least for my implementation. I also appreciate you and others here which have helped with my questions. I know you and Eric Espinoza work hard to help everyone and keep the qmailtoaster upgraded - thank you. And with that job comes answering questions, and so I just wanted to make sure I said Thank you. John On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Eric Shubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tek Support wrote: Thanks Eric, I realize I don't need 587 at all with spamdyke, I was trying to ask if I needed 587 if spamdyke was using spamhaus. Since spamhaus used by itself was causing rejections to my at home dynamic users it seemed strange that spamhaus was blocking my dynamic users but it was not blocking them when run with spamdyke. Since I don't fully understand the internals, I was asking about that specifically so I don't screw up my at home users. Let me see if I can explain this. You don't need port 587 with spamdyke because spamdyke turns off all of its filtering if the connection (sender) authenticates successfully. On the other hand, rblsmtpd is oblivious to authentication, so it rejects connections which might otherwise be able to authenticate. It's simply a weakness in the rblsmtpd program. And I believe it is true, that if I have dynamic IP users, and I'm using spamhaus by itself, then I do require port 587. Isn't that true? Not exactly. It's the combination of rblsmtpd and spamhaus which requires you to use port 587. spamhaus with spamdyke is ok on port 25. So it's more the case of the use of rblsmtpd (with certain blocklists which block dynamic addresses) which requires the use of port 587. And again if I have dynamic IP users, and I'm using spamdyke which includes spamhaus, then I don't need to use 587. Is that right? Yes, for the most part. I hate to split hairs, but in this case it might be appropriate. Regarding for the most part, spamdyke doesn't necessarily (or really) include spamhaus. If you'd have said I'm using spamdyke *with* spamhaus, that would be (slightly) clearer. You can use spamdyke with or without spamhaus (or any other RBL). Using spamhaus (and a few others) is highly recommended though. Thanks again, I'm just trying to be clear. No problem. I hope I can help you understand how it works. John On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Eric Shubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tek Support wrote: So if I understand correctly, spamdyke can use spamhaus, and I do see it in my /etc/spamdyke/spamdyke.conf file (uncommented). Which means I don't need the BLACKLIST= in my run file, is this correct? Yes. Spamdyke does everything that rblsmtpd used to do (and a lot more). And if I might ask a followup question, it was said in another post that spamdyke allows authenticated users in past spamhaus. Ok, but if spamdyke allows authenticated users in, while using spamhaus, then why do I need port 587? You don't need port 587 if you're using spamdyke. You do need port 587 if you're not using spamdyke. And just out of curiosity, if spamdyke is a more versitile product, allowing my dynamic users to authenticate and send mail on port 25 while also using spamhaus dynamic blocking, why isn't spamdyke installed by default? spamdyke is fairly new to the toaster. I expect that it will become part of the stock toaster at some point, but that's up to Erik Espinoza, who is the toaster maintainer. Thanks John On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Eric Shubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sam Clippinger wrote: To answer #1, spamdyke will definitely use Spamhaus' DNS RBLs. The default configuration of spamdyke (as installed by QTP) does not include Spamhaus, however. I beg your pardon. ;) Here are the default RBLs as installed by QTP: check-dnsrbl=zen.spamhaus.org check-dnsrbl=bl.spamcop.net check-dnsrbl=list.dsbl.org If you are using spamdyke version 3.1.x, edit the configuration file /etc/spamdyke/spamdyke.conf and add the following line: check-dnsrbl=zen.spamhaus.org If you are using spamdyke version 4.x, edit the configuration file /etc/spamdyke/spamdyke.conf and add the following line: dns-blacklist-entry=zen.spamhaus.org To add multiple DNS RBLs, simply repeat the line with different values. -- Sam Clippinger QTP only installs/upgrades spamdyke 3.1.x at this time. I hope to add 4.x capability soon. It'll likely be a couple weeks before I get to it though. Anil Aliyan wrote: pretty smart question John, I also would like to hear the answer for it from the experts. - Original Message - From: Tek Support [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, August 08, 2008 8:37 AM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Authentication to bypass spam checks Hi all, I have a few question. Before I learned of this port 587, my only option was to disable spamhaus. And all I did to disable it was to remove it from my
RE: [qmailtoaster] QMAILtoaster upgrade fails
The distro is Centos 5.2 x86_64 kernel-2.6.18 Toaster 1.3 Linked sandbox seemed to work thank you. Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 11:51:35 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] QMAILtoaster upgrade fails James Ecker wrote: I have installed qmailtoaster-plus sucessfully, but when I run qtp-newmodel I receive the following error message chroot: cannot run command `qtp-build-rpms': No such file or directory. Does anyone have any ideas? That's unusual. Need more info to tell for sure, like distro version, toaster versions. If I had to guess, I'd say you're running an older kernel (2.6.9 or so) and you tried using a unionfs sandbox. If that's the case, I'd either upgrade to a newer kernel, or run qtp-newmodel with a copied or linked sandbox. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Your PC, mobile phone, and online services work together like never before. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/108587394/direct/01/
RE: [qmailtoaster] QMAILtoaster upgrade fails
_ From: James Ecker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2008 11:18 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] QMAILtoaster upgrade fails I have installed qmailtoaster-plus sucessfully, but when I run qtp-newmodel I receive the following error message chroot: cannot run command `qtp-build-rpms': No such file or directory. Does anyone have any ideas? _ Get Windows Live and get whatever you need, wherever you are. Start here. http://www.windowslive.com/default.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_Home_082008
RE: [qmailtoaster] QMAILtoaster upgrade fails
Sorry about the blank replay a minute ago.. I have this same problem. I haven't been able to get unionfs to work yet. I'm also on 2.6.18 kernel. I've just been using linked. I'm chasing the elusive pizza. -P _ From: James Ecker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2008 4:54 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] QMAILtoaster upgrade fails The distro is Centos 5.2 x86_64 kernel-2.6.18 Toaster 1.3 Linked sandbox seemed to work thank you. Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 11:51:35 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] QMAILtoaster upgrade fails James Ecker wrote: I have installed qmailtoaster-plus sucessfully, but when I run qtp-newmodel I receive the following error message chroot: cannot run command `qtp-build-rpms': No such file or directory. Does anyone have any ideas? That's unusual. Need more info to tell for sure, like distro version, toaster versions. If I had to guess, I'd say you're running an older kernel (2.6.9 or so) and you tried using a unionfs sandbox. If that's the case, I'd either upgrade to a newer kernel, or run qtp-newmodel with a copied or linked sandbox. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Your PC, mobile phone, and online services work together like never before. See how Windows http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/108587394/direct/01/ R fits your life
[qmailtoaster] Squirrelmail logs
Is there such a thing as a log file that would show users checking in from Squirrelmail? I don't see anything about it in the docs. Thanks Phil
Re: [qmailtoaster] Squirrelmail logs
Squirrelmail uses IMAP, so the logs will be in /var/log/qmail/imap4/ current coming from the IP 127.0.0.1. James On 10 Aug 2008, at 02:00, Phil Leinhauser wrote: Is there such a thing as a log file that would show users checking in from Squirrelmail? I don’t see anything about it in the docs. Thanks Phil
RE: [qmailtoaster] Squirrelmail logs
I just found a Squirrelmail plugin that does what I'm looking for. I also added it to the splunk list. Thanks -P _ From: James Palmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2008 9:40 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Squirrelmail logs Squirrelmail uses IMAP, so the logs will be in /var/log/qmail/imap4/current coming from the IP 127.0.0.1. James On 10 Aug 2008, at 02:00, Phil Leinhauser wrote: Is there such a thing as a log file that would show users checking in from Squirrelmail? I don't see anything about it in the docs. Thanks Phil
