[qmailtoaster] SPAM WhiteList

2009-10-05 Thread Domnick Eger
Hi Qmail Group,

 

What the best way of figuring out why Qmail would be blocking it own domains
that its hosting as SPAM, had a few complaints from my internal users about
getting marked as SPAM when they sent to the same domain. Any suggestions
would be appreciated :-).



Re: [qmailtoaster] qmailtoaster-plus-0.3.1-1.4.14 released

2009-10-05 Thread Kartone
Thanks for this HUGE work to support the entire community of this  
extraordinary package!

:-)

Kartone

Il giorno 03/ott/2009, alle ore 20.03, Eric Shubert ha scritto:

I'm happy to announce the next release of qmailtoaster-plus! This is  
a fairly major release.


First and foremost, the qmailtoaster-plus.repo package has been  
expanded. It now includes repositories for each distro/version to  
provide the FUSE packages required by the updated qtp-newmodel.  
While it is usually a good idea to run

# yum update
before running qtp-newmodel, you *must* minimally run
# yum update qmailtoaster-plus.repo
before running the new qtp-newmodel with a unionfs sandbox.
If you don't do this update, you'll see:
Error getting repository data for qtp-CentOS, repository not found
qtp-mount-sandbox - installation of dependent packages failed
qtp-mount-sandbox - is your qmailtoaster-plus.repo package up to date?

Secondly, the unionfs sandbox used by qtp-newmodel has been totally  
revamped. It now runs with FUSE (Filesystem in USErspace), so it  
doesn't need to be rebuilt whenever the kernel is updated. This is  
compatible now with newer kernels (Fedora 10,11), and has been  
implemented in older kernels (2.6.9+) with the help of the dkms and  
dkms-fuse packages. All of the details are handled automatically by  
the qtp-mount-sandbox script, which is invoked by qtp-newmodel (and  
can be run from the CLI FWIW). If you're running CentOS, be sure to  
be patient when dkms-fuse is installing. It takes a bit of time  
because it builds a kernel module during the post install process.


The unionfs sandbox has not been tested on Suse or Mandriva. I  
expect there will be a few things that need to be done to get it  
working, but it shouldn't be difficult, as the pieces are all in  
place. If one of you who is running Suse or Mandriva would like to  
test this functionality, please contact me.


The other fairly big change is that the qtp-extraclam script has  
been replaced with a new qtp-install-sanesecurity script. This  
script downloads and installs the current version of the script  
which maintains the extra clamav databases. When a new version  
becomes available, you can simply rerun qtp-install-sanesecurity to  
get the latest version.


There are other minor enhancements as well. qtp-newmodel now lets  
you select packages for re-install, and it also displays the last 10  
lines of the log file if/when there's a build error. See the release  
notes for any other little things I may have missed in this  
announcement.


As always, please post to the list with any questions or comments.

NJoy!
--
-Eric 'shubes'


-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com 
)
  Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and  
installations.

If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
   Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and  
packages.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
   For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com





-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com




Re: [qmailtoaster] SPAM WhiteList

2009-10-05 Thread Richard Vinke
I created a file: /etc/mail/spamassassin/whitelist.cf
and filled it with: whitelist_from postb...@hallmark.be.
See also
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html
Don't forget to run /var/qmail/bin/simscanmk; qmailctl cdb.

Richard Vinke.

 Hi Qmail Group,



 What the best way of figuring out why Qmail would be blocking it own
 domains
 that its hosting as SPAM, had a few complaints from my internal users
 about
 getting marked as SPAM when they sent to the same domain. Any suggestions
 would be appreciated :-).





-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
  If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
 Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.
 
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
 For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com




Re: [qmailtoaster] SPAM WhiteList

2009-10-05 Thread Ganesh.payelkar
Dear dege,

  Can you paste one of the mail header which you are getting as
SPAM.


-- 
Regards,

Ganesh P

On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Domnick Eger de...@cobercafe.net wrote:

  Hi Qmail Group,



 What the best way of figuring out why Qmail would be blocking it own
 domains that its hosting as SPAM, had a few complaints from my internal
 users about getting marked as SPAM when they sent to the same domain. Any
 suggestions would be appreciated J.



[qmailtoaster] want to implement qmailanalog

2009-10-05 Thread karpaha vinayaham
Dear List

Have anyone tried or using qmailanalog utility with qmailtoaster. I would
like to try this on my setup, as the features are really good .

qmailanalog is a collection of tools to help you analyze
qmailhttp://cr.yp.to/qmail.html's
activity record. It supplies statistics to answer a wide variety of
questions:


   - overall: how many messages? recipients? attempts? etc.
   - ddist: how soon were 50% of the messages delivered? 90%? 95%? 99%?
   - rxdelay: what's the best order of recipients for mailing lists?
   - recipients, rhosts: who's getting mail? bytes? messages? attempts?
   - successes, failures, deferrals: why? how often? how much delay?
   - senders, suids: messages? bytes? load? recipients? attempts? delay?

 qmailanalog also includes several tools to focus attention on particular
senders, recipients, or messages.

-- 
With Regards
Vinay


Re: [qmailtoaster] want to implement qmailanalog

2009-10-05 Thread Maxwell Smart
I am pretty sure the isoqlog in admin-toaster covers most if not all of 
what you're looking for.


karpaha vinayaham wrote:

Dear List

Have anyone tried or using qmailanalog utility with qmailtoaster. I 
would like to try this on my setup, as the features are really good .



  qmailanalog is a collection of tools to help you analyze qmail
  http://cr.yp.to/qmail.html's activity record. It supplies
  statistics to answer a wide variety of questions:

* overall: how many messages? recipients? attempts? etc.
* ddist: how soon were 50% of the messages delivered? 90%? 95%? 99%?
* rxdelay: what's the best order of recipients for mailing lists?
* recipients, rhosts: who's getting mail? bytes? messages? attempts?
* successes, failures, deferrals: why? how often? how much delay?
* senders, suids: messages? bytes? load? recipients? attempts? delay?

qmailanalog also includes several tools to focus attention on 
particular senders, recipients, or messages.



--
With Regards
Vinay


-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com




Re: [qmailtoaster] want to implement qmailanalog

2009-10-05 Thread Lucian Cristian
I worked some time ago on this, you have to do a very hard pach (hard in 
the way that you have to modify lots o strings) and only by replacing 
simscan by qmail-scanner


I didn't have time to try it on simscan, I like the daily report too

Regards
Lucian

karpaha vinayaham wrote:

Dear List

Have anyone tried or using qmailanalog utility with qmailtoaster. I 
would like to try this on my setup, as the features are really good .



  qmailanalog is a collection of tools to help you analyze qmail
  http://cr.yp.to/qmail.html's activity record. It supplies
  statistics to answer a wide variety of questions:

* overall: how many messages? recipients? attempts? etc.
* ddist: how soon were 50% of the messages delivered? 90%? 95%? 99%?
* rxdelay: what's the best order of recipients for mailing lists?
* recipients, rhosts: who's getting mail? bytes? messages? attempts?
* successes, failures, deferrals: why? how often? how much delay?
* senders, suids: messages? bytes? load? recipients? attempts? delay?

qmailanalog also includes several tools to focus attention on 
particular senders, recipients, or messages.



--
With Regards
Vinay




__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 4479 (20091004) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com




Re: [qmailtoaster] want to implement qmailanalog

2009-10-05 Thread Eric Shubert
Perhaps this can/should be discussed on the development list. IIRC Jake 
 has some plans to change scanning in a future release.


Lucian Cristian wrote:
I worked some time ago on this, you have to do a very hard pach (hard in 
the way that you have to modify lots o strings) and only by replacing 
simscan by qmail-scanner


I didn't have time to try it on simscan, I like the daily report too

Regards
Lucian

karpaha vinayaham wrote:

Dear List

Have anyone tried or using qmailanalog utility with qmailtoaster. I 
would like to try this on my setup, as the features are really good .



  qmailanalog is a collection of tools to help you analyze qmail
  http://cr.yp.to/qmail.html's activity record. It supplies
  statistics to answer a wide variety of questions:

* overall: how many messages? recipients? attempts? etc.
* ddist: how soon were 50% of the messages delivered? 90%? 95%? 99%?
* rxdelay: what's the best order of recipients for mailing lists?
* recipients, rhosts: who's getting mail? bytes? messages? attempts?
* successes, failures, deferrals: why? how often? how much delay?
* senders, suids: messages? bytes? load? recipients? attempts? delay?

qmailanalog also includes several tools to focus attention on 
particular senders, recipients, or messages.



--
With Regards
Vinay



--
-Eric 'shubes'


-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com




Re: [qmailtoaster] want to implement qmailanalog

2009-10-05 Thread Lucian Cristian
from my test simscan and qmail-scanner had almost the same results, 
(1 mails at a time on lan connection)


Regards
Lucian

Eric Shubert wrote:
Perhaps this can/should be discussed on the development list. IIRC 
Jake  has some plans to change scanning in a future release.


Lucian Cristian wrote:
I worked some time ago on this, you have to do a very hard pach (hard 
in the way that you have to modify lots o strings) and only by 
replacing simscan by qmail-scanner


I didn't have time to try it on simscan, I like the daily report too

Regards
Lucian

karpaha vinayaham wrote:

Dear List

Have anyone tried or using qmailanalog utility with qmailtoaster. I 
would like to try this on my setup, as the features are really good .



  qmailanalog is a collection of tools to help you analyze qmail
  http://cr.yp.to/qmail.html's activity record. It supplies
  statistics to answer a wide variety of questions:

* overall: how many messages? recipients? attempts? etc.
* ddist: how soon were 50% of the messages delivered? 90%? 95%? 
99%?

* rxdelay: what's the best order of recipients for mailing lists?
* recipients, rhosts: who's getting mail? bytes? messages? 
attempts?

* successes, failures, deferrals: why? how often? how much delay?
* senders, suids: messages? bytes? load? recipients? attempts? 
delay?


qmailanalog also includes several tools to focus attention on 
particular senders, recipients, or messages.



--
With Regards
Vinay







__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 4479 (20091004) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com




Re: [qmailtoaster] want to implement qmailanalog

2009-10-05 Thread Eric Shubert
I would expect their performance to be similar, as they're just doing 
coordination. SpamAssassin and Clamav are doing the heavy work.


Lucian Cristian wrote:
from my test simscan and qmail-scanner had almost the same results, 
(1 mails at a time on lan connection)


Regards
Lucian

Eric Shubert wrote:
Perhaps this can/should be discussed on the development list. IIRC 
Jake  has some plans to change scanning in a future release.


Lucian Cristian wrote:
I worked some time ago on this, you have to do a very hard pach (hard 
in the way that you have to modify lots o strings) and only by 
replacing simscan by qmail-scanner


I didn't have time to try it on simscan, I like the daily report too

Regards
Lucian

karpaha vinayaham wrote:

Dear List

Have anyone tried or using qmailanalog utility with qmailtoaster. I 
would like to try this on my setup, as the features are really good .



  qmailanalog is a collection of tools to help you analyze qmail
  http://cr.yp.to/qmail.html's activity record. It supplies
  statistics to answer a wide variety of questions:

* overall: how many messages? recipients? attempts? etc.
* ddist: how soon were 50% of the messages delivered? 90%? 95%? 
99%?

* rxdelay: what's the best order of recipients for mailing lists?
* recipients, rhosts: who's getting mail? bytes? messages? 
attempts?

* successes, failures, deferrals: why? how often? how much delay?
* senders, suids: messages? bytes? load? recipients? attempts? 
delay?


qmailanalog also includes several tools to focus attention on 
particular senders, recipients, or messages.



--
With Regards
Vinay



--
-Eric 'shubes'


-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com




Re: [qmailtoaster] Error while sending mail from outlook

2009-10-05 Thread Jose Mario Pires
Hi,

When I saw the subject, I thought it was the same problem I had when I
started using zen.spamhaus.org (or something like it 8-). But mine was
stranger... Some of my clients got the same verbosing error that you
show in the attachment, but many of my users using the d*** M$ Outlook
2003 and 2007 (and myself, when I did the test) got just an error
that didn't disclose any clue to what might be happening. I checked
the logs and I saw no traces of those connections. The funny thing is
that I was able to relay email with Thunderbird from more than one
machine in which Outlook had that problem.

Anyway, I solved the problem instructing everyone to use the port 587.

Regards,
JMP

On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 12:32 PM,  a...@ikf.co.in wrote:
 Hi Everyone,

 From today onwards I started getting error in outlook while sending mail
 from one of my remote location office..Error image is attached with the
 mail..I had white listed the static ip of remote location in spamdyke..Also
 I had make and entry for particular static ip in tcp.smtp file to skip the
 RBL check..But still I'm getting same error.

 Regards,
 Amit
 -
 Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
 (www.vickersconsulting.com)
    Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
      If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
 -
     Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and
 packages.

      To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
     For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com



-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
  If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
 Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

  To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
 For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com




Re: [qmailtoaster] Fully qualified hostname with multiple domain names

2009-10-05 Thread Jake Vickers

Eric Shubert wrote:

Interesting.

I don't buy that using an IP address is necessarily the best practice 
though. Here are my thoughts on this.




It does not matter so much these days, but it used to be best practice 
for multi-domain machines that accept mail. The reason being that when a 
connection is coming in the recipient server has no idea (initially) 
what domain the message is destined for, so it should answer with an IP 
address since this IP address *should always* be the answer when 
checking a domain's MX record versus the domain name which may not be 
related to the recipient domain.
For diagnosing purposes when the sending admin checks the logs and sees 
the IP address for the server he can then check the MX record and verify 
the IP address.
These days it's a given that a mail server is accepting mail for 
multiple domains and this does not matter as much, but I have seen it 
used for a lot of older email shops.


-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com




Re: [qmailtoaster] Fully qualified hostname with multiple domain names

2009-10-05 Thread Eric Shubert

Jake Vickers wrote:

Eric Shubert wrote:

Interesting.

I don't buy that using an IP address is necessarily the best practice 
though. Here are my thoughts on this.




It does not matter so much these days, but it used to be best practice 
for multi-domain machines that accept mail. The reason being that when a 
connection is coming in the recipient server has no idea (initially) 
what domain the message is destined for, so it should answer with an IP 
address since this IP address *should always* be the answer when 
checking a domain's MX record versus the domain name which may not be 
related to the recipient domain.
For diagnosing purposes when the sending admin checks the logs and sees 
the IP address for the server he can then check the MX record and verify 
the IP address.
These days it's a given that a mail server is accepting mail for 
multiple domains and this does not matter as much, but I have seen it 
used for a lot of older email shops.




Thanks for the explanation Jake. To be honest though, I don't really 
follow your logic. This has nothing to do with MX records that I've seen 
in the RFCs.


BL, I agree it doesn't matter much, at least until a server refuses mail 
from you because of it. I still think that the best value here is a 
hostname that has a type A record matching the IP address that is used 
to connect to the host. If this is the case and a receiving server has a 
problem with the name, then I think the problem lies with the receiving 
server.


--
-Eric 'shubes'


-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com