Re: [qmailtoaster] SPAM WhiteList

[Richard Vinke]

I created a file: /etc/mail/spamassassin/whitelist.cf
and filled it with: whitelist_from postb...@hallmark.be.
See also
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html
Don't forget to run /var/qmail/bin/simscanmk; qmailctl cdb.

Richard Vinke.

> Hi Qmail Group,
>
>
>
> What the best way of figuring out why Qmail would be blocking it own
> domains
> that its hosting as SPAM, had a few complaints from my internal users
> about
> getting marked as SPAM when they sent to the same domain. Any suggestions
> would be appreciated :-).
>
>



-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
  If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
 Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.
 
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
 For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] SPAM WhiteList

[Ganesh.payelkar]

Dear dege,

  Can you paste one of the mail header which you are getting as
SPAM.


-- 
Regards,

Ganesh P

On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Domnick Eger  wrote:

>  Hi Qmail Group,
>
>
>
> What the best way of figuring out why Qmail would be blocking it own
> domains that its hosting as SPAM, had a few complaints from my internal
> users about getting marked as SPAM when they sent to the same domain. Any
> suggestions would be appreciated J.
>

[qmailtoaster] want to implement qmailanalog

[karpaha vinayaham]

Dear List

Have anyone tried or using qmailanalog utility with qmailtoaster. I would
like to try this on my setup, as the features are really good .

qmailanalog is a collection of tools to help you analyze
qmail's
activity record. It supplies statistics to answer a wide variety of
questions:


   - overall: how many messages? recipients? attempts? etc.
   - ddist: how soon were 50% of the messages delivered? 90%? 95%? 99%?
   - rxdelay: what's the best order of recipients for mailing lists?
   - recipients, rhosts: who's getting mail? bytes? messages? attempts?
   - successes, failures, deferrals: why? how often? how much delay?
   - senders, suids: messages? bytes? load? recipients? attempts? delay?

 qmailanalog also includes several tools to focus attention on particular
senders, recipients, or messages.

-- 
With Regards
Vinay

Re: [qmailtoaster] want to implement qmailanalog

[Maxwell Smart]

I am pretty sure the isoqlog in admin-toaster covers most if not all of 
what you're looking for.


karpaha vinayaham wrote:

Dear List

Have anyone tried or using qmailanalog utility with qmailtoaster. I 
would like to try this on my setup, as the features are really good .



  qmailanalog is a collection of tools to help you analyze qmail
  's activity record. It supplies
  statistics to answer a wide variety of questions:

* overall: how many messages? recipients? attempts? etc.
* ddist: how soon were 50% of the messages delivered? 90%? 95%? 99%?
* rxdelay: what's the best order of recipients for mailing lists?
* recipients, rhosts: who's getting mail? bytes? messages? attempts?
* successes, failures, deferrals: why? how often? how much delay?
* senders, suids: messages? bytes? load? recipients? attempts? delay?

qmailanalog also includes several tools to focus attention on 
particular senders, recipients, or messages.



--
With Regards
Vinay


-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] want to implement qmailanalog

[Lucian Cristian]

I worked some time ago on this, you have to do a very hard pach (hard in 
the way that you have to modify lots o strings) and only by replacing 
simscan by qmail-scanner


I didn't have time to try it on simscan, I like the daily report too

Regards
Lucian

karpaha vinayaham wrote:

Dear List

Have anyone tried or using qmailanalog utility with qmailtoaster. I 
would like to try this on my setup, as the features are really good .



  qmailanalog is a collection of tools to help you analyze qmail
  's activity record. It supplies
  statistics to answer a wide variety of questions:

* overall: how many messages? recipients? attempts? etc.
* ddist: how soon were 50% of the messages delivered? 90%? 95%? 99%?
* rxdelay: what's the best order of recipients for mailing lists?
* recipients, rhosts: who's getting mail? bytes? messages? attempts?
* successes, failures, deferrals: why? how often? how much delay?
* senders, suids: messages? bytes? load? recipients? attempts? delay?

qmailanalog also includes several tools to focus attention on 
particular senders, recipients, or messages.



--
With Regards
Vinay




__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 4479 (20091004) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] want to implement qmailanalog

[Eric Shubert]

Perhaps this can/should be discussed on the development list. IIRC Jake 
 has some plans to change scanning in a future release.


Lucian Cristian wrote:
I worked some time ago on this, you have to do a very hard pach (hard in 
the way that you have to modify lots o strings) and only by replacing 
simscan by qmail-scanner


I didn't have time to try it on simscan, I like the daily report too

Regards
Lucian

karpaha vinayaham wrote:

Dear List

Have anyone tried or using qmailanalog utility with qmailtoaster. I 
would like to try this on my setup, as the features are really good .



  qmailanalog is a collection of tools to help you analyze qmail
  's activity record. It supplies
  statistics to answer a wide variety of questions:

* overall: how many messages? recipients? attempts? etc.
* ddist: how soon were 50% of the messages delivered? 90%? 95%? 99%?
* rxdelay: what's the best order of recipients for mailing lists?
* recipients, rhosts: who's getting mail? bytes? messages? attempts?
* successes, failures, deferrals: why? how often? how much delay?
* senders, suids: messages? bytes? load? recipients? attempts? delay?

qmailanalog also includes several tools to focus attention on 
particular senders, recipients, or messages.



--
With Regards
Vinay



--
-Eric 'shubes'


-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] want to implement qmailanalog

[Lucian Cristian]

from my test simscan and qmail-scanner had almost the same results, 
(1 mails at a time on lan connection)


Regards
Lucian

Eric Shubert wrote:
Perhaps this can/should be discussed on the development list. IIRC 
Jake  has some plans to change scanning in a future release.


Lucian Cristian wrote:
I worked some time ago on this, you have to do a very hard pach (hard 
in the way that you have to modify lots o strings) and only by 
replacing simscan by qmail-scanner


I didn't have time to try it on simscan, I like the daily report too

Regards
Lucian

karpaha vinayaham wrote:

Dear List

Have anyone tried or using qmailanalog utility with qmailtoaster. I 
would like to try this on my setup, as the features are really good .



  qmailanalog is a collection of tools to help you analyze qmail
  's activity record. It supplies
  statistics to answer a wide variety of questions:

* overall: how many messages? recipients? attempts? etc.
* ddist: how soon were 50% of the messages delivered? 90%? 95%? 
99%?

* rxdelay: what's the best order of recipients for mailing lists?
* recipients, rhosts: who's getting mail? bytes? messages? 
attempts?

* successes, failures, deferrals: why? how often? how much delay?
* senders, suids: messages? bytes? load? recipients? attempts? 
delay?


qmailanalog also includes several tools to focus attention on 
particular senders, recipients, or messages.



--
With Regards
Vinay







__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 4479 (20091004) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] want to implement qmailanalog

[Eric Shubert]

I would expect their performance to be similar, as they're just doing 
coordination. SpamAssassin and Clamav are doing the heavy work.


Lucian Cristian wrote:
from my test simscan and qmail-scanner had almost the same results, 
(1 mails at a time on lan connection)


Regards
Lucian

Eric Shubert wrote:
Perhaps this can/should be discussed on the development list. IIRC 
Jake  has some plans to change scanning in a future release.


Lucian Cristian wrote:
I worked some time ago on this, you have to do a very hard pach (hard 
in the way that you have to modify lots o strings) and only by 
replacing simscan by qmail-scanner


I didn't have time to try it on simscan, I like the daily report too

Regards
Lucian

karpaha vinayaham wrote:

Dear List

Have anyone tried or using qmailanalog utility with qmailtoaster. I 
would like to try this on my setup, as the features are really good .



  qmailanalog is a collection of tools to help you analyze qmail
  's activity record. It supplies
  statistics to answer a wide variety of questions:

* overall: how many messages? recipients? attempts? etc.
* ddist: how soon were 50% of the messages delivered? 90%? 95%? 
99%?

* rxdelay: what's the best order of recipients for mailing lists?
* recipients, rhosts: who's getting mail? bytes? messages? 
attempts?

* successes, failures, deferrals: why? how often? how much delay?
* senders, suids: messages? bytes? load? recipients? attempts? 
delay?


qmailanalog also includes several tools to focus attention on 
particular senders, recipients, or messages.



--
With Regards
Vinay



--
-Eric 'shubes'


-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Error while sending mail from outlook

[Jose Mario Pires]

Hi,

When I saw the subject, I thought it was the same problem I had when I
started using zen.spamhaus.org (or something like it 8-). But mine was
stranger... Some of my clients got the same "verbosing error" that you
show in the attachment, but many of my users using the d*** M$ Outlook
2003 and 2007 (and myself, when I did the test) got "just an error"
that didn't disclose any clue to what might be happening. I checked
the logs and I saw no traces of those connections. The funny thing is
that I was able to relay email with Thunderbird from more than one
machine in which Outlook had that problem.

Anyway, I "solved" the problem instructing everyone to use the port 587.

Regards,
JMP

On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 12:32 PM,   wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> From today onwards I started getting error in outlook while sending mail
> from one of my remote location office..Error image is attached with the
> mail..I had white listed the static ip of remote location in spamdyke..Also
> I had make and entry for particular static ip in tcp.smtp file to skip the
> RBL check..But still I'm getting same error.
>
> Regards,
> Amit
> -
> Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
> (www.vickersconsulting.com)
>    Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
>      If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
> -
>     Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and
> packages.
>
>      To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
>     For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
>
>

-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
  If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
 Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

  To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
 For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Fully qualified hostname with multiple domain names

[Jake Vickers]

Eric Shubert wrote:

Interesting.

I don't buy that using an IP address is necessarily the best practice 
though. Here are my thoughts on this.




It does not matter so much these days, but it used to be best practice 
for multi-domain machines that accept mail. The reason being that when a 
connection is coming in the recipient server has no idea (initially) 
what domain the message is destined for, so it should answer with an IP 
address since this IP address *should always* be the answer when 
checking a domain's MX record versus the domain name which may not be 
related to the recipient domain.
For diagnosing purposes when the sending admin checks the logs and sees 
the IP address for the server he can then check the MX record and verify 
the IP address.
These days it's a given that a mail server is accepting mail for 
multiple domains and this does not matter as much, but I have seen it 
used for a lot of "older" email shops.


-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Fully qualified hostname with multiple domain names

[Eric Shubert]

Jake Vickers wrote:

Eric Shubert wrote:

Interesting.

I don't buy that using an IP address is necessarily the best practice 
though. Here are my thoughts on this.




It does not matter so much these days, but it used to be best practice 
for multi-domain machines that accept mail. The reason being that when a 
connection is coming in the recipient server has no idea (initially) 
what domain the message is destined for, so it should answer with an IP 
address since this IP address *should always* be the answer when 
checking a domain's MX record versus the domain name which may not be 
related to the recipient domain.
For diagnosing purposes when the sending admin checks the logs and sees 
the IP address for the server he can then check the MX record and verify 
the IP address.
These days it's a given that a mail server is accepting mail for 
multiple domains and this does not matter as much, but I have seen it 
used for a lot of "older" email shops.




Thanks for the explanation Jake. To be honest though, I don't really 
follow your logic. This has nothing to do with MX records that I've seen 
in the RFCs.


BL, I agree it doesn't matter much, at least until a server refuses mail 
from you because of it. I still think that the best value here is a 
hostname that has a type A record matching the IP address that is used 
to connect to the host. If this is the case and a receiving server has a 
problem with the name, then I think the problem lies with the receiving 
server.


--
-Eric 'shubes'


-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com