Re: [qmailtoaster] DNS temporary failure if one DNS server dont work.
That means your only DNS is your local DNS so the qmail will never find any server outside it's network... You should add the DNS of your preference. For example, to add google's DNS, edit the file /etc/resolv.conf and add these lines at the end of the file: nameserver 8.8.8.8 nameserver 4.4.4.4 On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 4:39 AM, d...@demod.pl wrote: In resolv.conf I have only: search localdomain nameserver 127.0.0.1 - Original Message - From: Tony White t...@ycs.com.au To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 2:55 AM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] DNS temporary failure if one DNS server dont work. Marek, What order are the dns servers in /etc/resolv.conf? If they are the failing one on line one then reverse them. On 14/02/2011 9:03 AM, d...@demod.pl wrote: Thanks for fast reply. I use 2 named servers. everyone in different locations. One DNS server is on the same machine as qmailtoaster and always on. But when secondary DNS on the other location die i canot send email outside. - Original Message - From: Carlos Herrera Polo carlos.herrerap...@gmail.com To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2011 10:02 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] DNS temporary failure if one DNS server dont work. Djbdns or named 2011/2/13, Martin Waschbüsch mar...@waschbuesch.de: What you could try is this: Have a local caching DNS server and that takes care of resolving to as many 'real' DNS servers as you like. Doing so means that your DNS server (local) is ALWAYS on (unless the daemon dies) and this problem won't occur again. Martin -- Martin Waschbüsch IT-Dienstleistungen Lautensackstr. 16 80687 München Telefon: +49 89 57005708 Fax: +49 89 57868023 Mobil: +49 170 2189794 mar...@waschbuesch.de http://martin.waschbuesch.de Am 13.02.2011 um 19:48 schrieb d...@demod.pl d...@demod.pl: Hello everyone I have a problem with my qmailtoster. When one of my DNS server is down i cant send email. When i try send email outside i have an error message: DNS temporary failure. This hapen even if one DNS server works correctly. Does anyone know how can I solve it? Thanx for you help. Marek __ Informacja programu ESET NOD32 Antivirus, wersja bazy sygnatur wirusow 5835 (20110131) __ Wiadomosc zostala sprawdzona przez program ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.pl lub http://www.eset.com - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com -- best wishes Tony White - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group ( www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com __ Informacja programu ESET NOD32 Antivirus, wersja bazy sygnatur wirusow 5835 (20110131) __ Wiadomosc zostala sprawdzona przez program ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.pl lub http://www.eset.com __ Informacja programu ESET NOD32 Antivirus, wersja bazy sygnatur wirusow 5835 (20110131) __ Wiadomosc zostala sprawdzona przez program ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.pl lub http://www.eset.com - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group ( www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] disable spam assasin
Maybe simscan is still invoking both scans. # vim /var/qmail/control/simcontrol And replace :clam=yes,spam=yes with :clam=no,spam=no Bruno On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Edward Finlayson edward.finlay...@btinternet.com wrote: Hi Rafeal, Tried this but still get spamhaus warning when testing so must still be enabled somewhere. Output of qmailctl stat is: [root@CPA3 ~]# qmailctl stat authlib: up (pid 26989) 201 seconds clamd: up (pid 27470) 0 seconds imap4: up (pid 27031) 201 seconds imap4-ssl: up (pid 26976) 201 seconds pop3: up (pid 26956) 201 seconds pop3-ssl: up (pid 26946) 201 seconds send: up (pid 26985) 201 seconds smtp: up (pid 26944) 201 seconds spamd: up (pid 27471) 0 seconds submission: up (pid 27004) 201 seconds authlib/log: up (pid 26990) 201 seconds clamd/log: up (pid 26968) 202 seconds imap4/log: up (pid 26973) 202 seconds imap4-ssl/log: up (pid 26978) 202 seconds pop3/log: up (pid 26965) 202 seconds pop3-ssl/log: up (pid 27029) 202 seconds send/log: up (pid 26988) 202 seconds smtp/log: up (pid 26948) 202 seconds spamd/log: up (pid 26939) 202 seconds submission/log: up (pid 26963) 202 seconds so the service is not running but something is still calling it. Thanks for the suggestion, Fin *From:* Rafael [mailto:raf...@ic.uff.br] *Sent:* 02 February 2011 17:11 *To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com *Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] disable spam assasin Try remove execution bit from run in /var/qmail/supervise/spamd/run and /var/qmail/supervise/clamd/run. Run qmailctl stop and qmailctl start to restart this server. Check in: qmailctl stat Sorry my words, i´m read english but write. Em 02/02/2011 14:33, Edward Finlayson escreveu: Hi all, I recently installed toaster on a centos 5 x64 system and inadvertently enabled spam checking. I now need to disable it completely for this system. My question is how can clamav and spam assassin be completely removed / switched off. I have tried various thing but incoming mail is still being parsed. I just want this part of toaster gone, any ideas?? Thanks in advance, Fin -- -- Rafael P. de Abreu Rosa Tecnico de Laboratorio Instituto de Computação - UFF (21) 2629-5664 / (21) 87989057
Re: [qmailtoaster] disable spam assasin
Well, this is odd. Not for me because I'm trying to enable clam and spamass in my 2 servers but I can't find the way yet. If you want we can switch servers :P I'm still trying to figure out how to enable this at my servers and it looks like we are trying to find the same thing. I'll let you know if I figure it out. Bruno. On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Edward Finlayson edward.finlay...@btinternet.com wrote: Thanks Bruno, Done this, rebuilt simcontrol.cdb and restarted the server. Still get the same behaviour. Thanks anyway, Fin *From:* Bruno De Leone [mailto:dele...@gmail.com] *Sent:* 02 February 2011 18:30 *To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com *Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] disable spam assasin Maybe simscan is still invoking both scans. # vim /var/qmail/control/simcontrol And replace :clam=yes,spam=yes with :clam=no,spam=no Bruno On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Edward Finlayson edward.finlay...@btinternet.com wrote: Hi Rafeal, Tried this but still get spamhaus warning when testing so must still be enabled somewhere. Output of qmailctl stat is: [root@CPA3 ~]# qmailctl stat authlib: up (pid 26989) 201 seconds clamd: up (pid 27470) 0 seconds imap4: up (pid 27031) 201 seconds imap4-ssl: up (pid 26976) 201 seconds pop3: up (pid 26956) 201 seconds pop3-ssl: up (pid 26946) 201 seconds send: up (pid 26985) 201 seconds smtp: up (pid 26944) 201 seconds spamd: up (pid 27471) 0 seconds submission: up (pid 27004) 201 seconds authlib/log: up (pid 26990) 201 seconds clamd/log: up (pid 26968) 202 seconds imap4/log: up (pid 26973) 202 seconds imap4-ssl/log: up (pid 26978) 202 seconds pop3/log: up (pid 26965) 202 seconds pop3-ssl/log: up (pid 27029) 202 seconds send/log: up (pid 26988) 202 seconds smtp/log: up (pid 26948) 202 seconds spamd/log: up (pid 26939) 202 seconds submission/log: up (pid 26963) 202 seconds so the service is not running but something is still calling it. Thanks for the suggestion, Fin *From:* Rafael [mailto:raf...@ic.uff.br] *Sent:* 02 February 2011 17:11 *To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com *Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] disable spam assasin Try remove execution bit from run in /var/qmail/supervise/spamd/run and /var/qmail/supervise/clamd/run. Run qmailctl stop and qmailctl start to restart this server. Check in: qmailctl stat Sorry my words, i´m read english but write. Em 02/02/2011 14:33, Edward Finlayson escreveu: Hi all, I recently installed toaster on a centos 5 x64 system and inadvertently enabled spam checking. I now need to disable it completely for this system. My question is how can clamav and spam assassin be completely removed / switched off. I have tried various thing but incoming mail is still being parsed. I just want this part of toaster gone, any ideas?? Thanks in advance, Fin -- -- Rafael P. de Abreu Rosa Tecnico de Laboratorio Instituto de Computação - UFF (21) 2629-5664 / (21) 87989057
Re: [qmailtoaster] to add a domain
To add the domain mydomain.com: # /home/vpopmail/bin/vadddomain mydomain.com Then to add email an account: # /home/vpopmail/bin/vadduser lal...@mydomain.com Try the commands with no parameters to see all its options. On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Jim Shupert jshup...@pps-inc.com wrote: Friends, i wish to add a domain. I seem to recall that it is best to do this via the cli verses the web gui. what might be the command string to make an additional domain such as mydomain.com thanks
Re: [qmailtoaster] to add a domain
I guess that makes me a loser... bleh :P On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Michael Colvin mcol...@norcalisp.comwrote: J I was going to reply to your post with: “Na na! I beat you!”..But, I figured we’re too mature around here for that. :-P *Michael J. Colvin* *NorCal Internet Services* *www.norcalisp.com*** *(916) 864-* -- *From:* Maxwell Smart [mailto:c...@yother.com] *Sent:* Tuesday, February 01, 2011 12:11 PM *To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com *Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] to add a domain Your too fast Michael... On 02/01/2011 12:03 PM, Michael Colvin wrote: ./vadddomain mydomain.com password The “password” is the password for the “Postmaster” account for that domain. You can get a full list of options for ./vadddomain by entering it with no options. You must also be in the /home/vpopmail/bin folder. You can ls to get a list of the various other cli commands available. *Michael J. Colvin* *NorCal Internet Services* *www.norcalisp.com* *(916) 864-* -- *From:* Jim Shupert [mailto:jshup...@pps-inc.com jshup...@pps-inc.com] *Sent:* Tuesday, February 01, 2011 11:52 AM *To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com *Subject:* [qmailtoaster] to add a domain Friends, i wish to add a domain. I seem to recall that it is best to do this via the cli verses the web gui. what might be the command string to make an additional domain such as mydomain.com thanks -- Cecil Yother, Jr. cj cj's 2318 Clement Ave Alameda, CA 94501 tel 510.865.2787 http://yother.com Check out the new Volvo classified resource http://www.volvoclassified.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Videos on Youtube
Great videos! Thanks! :D On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Eric Broch ebr...@whitehorsetc.com wrote: Thanks, Jake!!! On 1/30/2011 8:05 AM, Jake Vickers wrote: I've started to upload some of the old Qmailtoaster Video Magazine videos to Youtube. I'll add more as I get time - these will *not* be any of the videos that are currently being sold to support the project. Go to Youtube and search for Qmailtoaster or the user qmailjake and you should find my channel. This link may work as well: http://www.youtube.com/user/qmailjake Still waiting on them to allow videos over 15 minutes so I can get some of the other ones up - hopefully soon. I'll add a link to the website soon with the links to the videos. Enjoy! - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group ( www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group ( www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] ClamAV-Toaster Build Issue
Inappropriate ioctl for device looks like the script is not being able to write on the drive see /mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log for more details paste the log file here, there might be more important information there On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Scott Hughes sonicscott9...@gmail.comwrote: I am having a strange build issue with the latest clam AV package. I think I have seen a similar issue come across the list but I cannot find it. Here are the details: Installing clamav-toaster-0.96.2-1.3.37 in the sandbox ... Preparing... ## clamav-toaster warning: /etc/freshclam.conf created as /etc/freshclam.conf.rpmnew ## error: unpacking of archive failed on file /usr/share/clamav: cpio: chown failed - Inappropriate ioctl for device end of log messages qtp-build-rpms - see /mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log for more details Build failed, Exiting. Any ideas? Thanks, Scott
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: dovecot, spam and others...
# cat /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private :allow,BADMIMETYPE=,BADLOADERTYPE=M,CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT=50,CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT=10,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote: It appears from the header that simscan didn't process the message. What's in your tcp.smtp file? On 01/20/2011 05:12 PM, Bruno De Leone wrote: I disabled spamdyke and messages are arriving as before. I'll enable it again when I can make the configurations for it right. What worries me is that mails are not being scanned by spamassassin or clamav. I'm looking to the first test emails I sent when I finished installing both servers and I can't find any header indicating the emails were scanned. # cat /var/qmail/control/simcontrol :clam=yes,spam=yes,spam_hits=2000,attach=.zzz # cat /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf http://local.cf ok_locales all skip_rbl_checks 1 required_score 5 report_safe 0 rewrite_header Subject ***SPAM*** use_pyzor 1 use_auto_whitelist 1 use_bayes 1 use_bayes_rules 1 bayes_auto_learn 1 Here is an email I sent from an account at adinet.com.uy http://adinet.com.uy to one of my toasters: Return-Path: dele...@adinet.com.uy mailto:dele...@adinet.com.uy Delivered-To: wi...@something.com mailto:wi...@something.com Received: (qmail 11069 invoked by uid 89); 24 Dec 2010 17:32:18 - Received: from unknown (HELO smtp-s04.adinet.com.uy http://smtp-s04.adinet.com.uy) (200.40.30.64) by mx.something.com http://mx.something.com with SMTP; 24 Dec 2010 17:32:18 - Received-SPF: pass (mx.something.com http://mx.something.com: SPF record at adinet.com.uy http://adinet.com.uy designates 200.40.30.64 as permitted sender) Received: from fe-ps05 (192.168.2.209) by smtp-s04.adinet.com.uy http://smtp-s04.adinet.com.uy (8.5.124.03) (authenticated as dele...@adinet.com.uy mailto:dele...@adinet.com.uy) id 4C7C4DE906BF2B95 for wi...@something.com mailto:wi...@something.com; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 15:32:13 -0200 Received: from [190.135.66.162] by correo.adinet.com.uy http://correo.adinet.com.uy via http; Fri Dec 24 14:32:12 UYT 2010 Message-ID: 19047404.1293211933059.JavaMail.tomcat@fe-ps05 Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 14:32:13 -0300 (UYT) From: dele...@adinet.com.uy mailto:dele...@adinet.com.uy dele...@adinet.com.uy mailto:dele...@adinet.com.uy Reply-To: dele...@adinet.com.uy mailto:dele...@adinet.com.uy dele...@adinet.com.uy mailto:dele...@adinet.com.uy To: wi...@something.com mailto:wi...@something.com Subject: hola! MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 190.135.66.162 Is there something I might have missed while installing spamassassin for it to run properly? Bruno On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Bruno De Leone dele...@gmail.com mailto:dele...@gmail.com wrote: Great! Thanks Eric! Bruno On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net mailto:e...@shubes.net wrote: # cd /var/qmail/supervise/smtp # ln -sf run.dist run # service qmail restart This will disactivate spamdyke. To reactivate it, replace run.dist with run.spamdyke. You may need to tweak spamdyke's configuration a little to get it working ideally in your environment. Sometimes you need to whitelist mail servers that are misconfigured, etc. Any problem you have with spamdyke is usually easy to remedy by adjusting its configuration. -- -Eric 'shubes' On 01/20/2011 03:22 PM, Bruno De Leone wrote: I just realized the received mails are not being scaned by spamassasin and reading other mails I found spamdyke might be my problem. I'm also not receiving some mails because of RDNS checks. How can I disable or remove Spamdyke until I can set everything right? Bruno. On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Cecil Yother, Jr. c...@yother.com mailto:c...@yother.com mailto:c...@yother.com mailto:c...@yother.com wrote: On 01/20/2011 10:45 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 01/20/2011 11:27 AM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote: Now, I'm thoroughly confused. What is the purpose of Simscan then if the file has already been scanned? Simscan does not itself do any scanning. It simply invokes other scanners. I got this part. The other scanners report back to simscan what the results were, and simscan takes the care of rejecting messages appropriately. Simscan isn't invoked after the scanners. Simscan invokes the other
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: dovecot, spam and others...
I never touched the tcp.smtp file before, not that I remember. I had to locate it to know where it was :P Both of my servers have the same tcp.smtp and they were installed on november 2010 and january 2011 so it might be missing on some source file. I'm adding the text you said and I'll report the results... Thanks! Bruno On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote: Do you know how: ,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue,NOP0FCHEC=1 came to be missing from the end of your :allow line? You really need them both. If they're missing in some source package somewhere, that really needs to be fixed. You might want/need them on the localhost (127.) line as well. I'm not sure about this because I've removed the localhost line from my configuration (I have Squirrelmail use port 587 and authenticate itself, so it's consistent with settings for other submissions). -- -Eric 'shubes' On 01/21/2011 05:14 PM, Bruno De Leone wrote: # cat /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private :allow,BADMIMETYPE=,BADLOADERTYPE=M,CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT=50,CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT=10,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net mailto:e...@shubes.net wrote: It appears from the header that simscan didn't process the message. What's in your tcp.smtp file? On 01/20/2011 05:12 PM, Bruno De Leone wrote: I disabled spamdyke and messages are arriving as before. I'll enable it again when I can make the configurations for it right. What worries me is that mails are not being scanned by spamassassin or clamav. I'm looking to the first test emails I sent when I finished installing both servers and I can't find any header indicating the emails were scanned. # cat /var/qmail/control/simcontrol :clam=yes,spam=yes,spam_hits=2000,attach=.zzz # cat /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf http://local.cf http://local.cf ok_locales all skip_rbl_checks 1 required_score 5 report_safe 0 rewrite_header Subject ***SPAM*** use_pyzor 1 use_auto_whitelist 1 use_bayes 1 use_bayes_rules 1 bayes_auto_learn 1 Here is an email I sent from an account at adinet.com.uy http://adinet.com.uy http://adinet.com.uy to one of my toasters: Return-Path: dele...@adinet.com.uy mailto:dele...@adinet.com.uy mailto:dele...@adinet.com.uy mailto:dele...@adinet.com.uy Delivered-To: wi...@something.com mailto:wi...@something.com mailto:wi...@something.com mailto:wi...@something.com Received: (qmail 11069 invoked by uid 89); 24 Dec 2010 17:32:18 - Received: from unknown (HELO smtp-s04.adinet.com.uy http://smtp-s04.adinet.com.uy http://smtp-s04.adinet.com.uy) (200.40.30.64) by mx.something.com http://mx.something.com http://mx.something.com with SMTP; 24 Dec 2010 17:32:18 - Received-SPF: pass (mx.something.com http://mx.something.com http://mx.something.com: SPF record at adinet.com.uy http://adinet.com.uy http://adinet.com.uy designates 200.40.30.64 as permitted sender) Received: from fe-ps05 (192.168.2.209) by smtp-s04.adinet.com.uy http://smtp-s04.adinet.com.uy http://smtp-s04.adinet.com.uy (8.5.124.03) (authenticated as dele...@adinet.com.uy mailto:dele...@adinet.com.uy mailto:dele...@adinet.com.uy mailto:dele...@adinet.com.uy) id 4C7C4DE906BF2B95 for wi...@something.com mailto:wi...@something.com mailto:wi...@something.com mailto:wi...@something.com; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 15:32:13 -0200 Received: from [190.135.66.162] by correo.adinet.com.uy http://correo.adinet.com.uy http://correo.adinet.com.uy via http; Fri Dec 24 14:32:12 UYT 2010 Message-ID: 19047404.1293211933059.JavaMail.tomcat@fe-ps05 Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 14:32:13 -0300 (UYT) From: dele...@adinet.com.uy mailto:dele...@adinet.com.uy mailto:dele...@adinet.com.uy mailto:dele...@adinet.com.uy dele...@adinet.com.uy mailto:dele...@adinet.com.uy mailto:dele...@adinet.com.uy mailto:dele...@adinet.com.uy Reply-To: dele...@adinet.com.uy mailto:dele...@adinet.com.uy mailto:dele...@adinet.com.uy mailto:dele...@adinet.com.uy dele...@adinet.com.uy mailto:dele...@adinet.com.uy mailto:dele...@adinet.com.uy mailto:dele...@adinet.com.uy To: wi...@something.com mailto:wi...@something.com mailto:wi...@something.com mailto:wi...@something.com Subject: hola! MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: dovecot, spam and others...
D'oh nothing =( Return-Path: wi...@xxx.com Delivered-To: de...@geekzone.com.uy Received: (qmail 22442 invoked by uid 89); 22 Jan 2011 01:25:23 - Received: from unknown (HELO xxx.com) (208.110.83.154) by mx.xen30.node01001 with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 22 Jan 2011 01:25:23 - Received-SPF: none (mx.xen30.node01001: domain at xxx.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) Received: (qmail 10908 invoked by uid 89); 22 Jan 2011 01:25:21 - Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=private; d=xxx.com; b=BowgCbJUIT8JXP5SJGcjB5D1ByFQGodQSxI1kGp1Rf3gjtv0z7xZBCILsFG265Yr; Received: from unknown (HELO webmail.xxx.com) (wi...@xxx.com@127.0.0.1) by mx.xxx.com with ESMTPA; 22 Jan 2011 01:25:21 - Received: from 186.48.208.107 (SquirrelMail authenticated user wi...@xxx.com) by webmail.xxx.com with HTTP; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 19:25:21 -0600 Message-ID: 6e2e63dd730a50f52dcfca4a172dec85.squir...@webmail.xxx.com Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 19:25:21 -0600 Subject: doh From: Mace Windu wi...@xxx.com To: de...@geekzone.com.uy Reply-To: wi...@xxx.com User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.20-1.3.17 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed;boundary==_20110121192521_34248 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Just in case: # cat /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue,NOP0FCHEC=1 :allow,BADMIMETYPE=,BADLOADERTYPE=M,CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT=50,CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT=10,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue,NOP0FCHEC=1 Bruno On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Bruno De Leone dele...@gmail.com wrote: I never touched the tcp.smtp file before, not that I remember. I had to locate it to know where it was :P Both of my servers have the same tcp.smtp and they were installed on november 2010 and january 2011 so it might be missing on some source file. I'm adding the text you said and I'll report the results... Thanks! Bruno On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote: Do you know how: ,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue,NOP0FCHEC=1 came to be missing from the end of your :allow line? You really need them both. If they're missing in some source package somewhere, that really needs to be fixed. You might want/need them on the localhost (127.) line as well. I'm not sure about this because I've removed the localhost line from my configuration (I have Squirrelmail use port 587 and authenticate itself, so it's consistent with settings for other submissions). -- -Eric 'shubes' On 01/21/2011 05:14 PM, Bruno De Leone wrote: # cat /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private :allow,BADMIMETYPE=,BADLOADERTYPE=M,CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT=50,CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT=10,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net mailto:e...@shubes.net wrote: It appears from the header that simscan didn't process the message. What's in your tcp.smtp file? On 01/20/2011 05:12 PM, Bruno De Leone wrote: I disabled spamdyke and messages are arriving as before. I'll enable it again when I can make the configurations for it right. What worries me is that mails are not being scanned by spamassassin or clamav. I'm looking to the first test emails I sent when I finished installing both servers and I can't find any header indicating the emails were scanned. # cat /var/qmail/control/simcontrol :clam=yes,spam=yes,spam_hits=2000,attach=.zzz # cat /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf http://local.cf http://local.cf ok_locales all skip_rbl_checks 1 required_score 5 report_safe 0 rewrite_header Subject ***SPAM*** use_pyzor 1 use_auto_whitelist 1 use_bayes 1 use_bayes_rules 1 bayes_auto_learn 1 Here is an email I sent from an account at adinet.com.uy http://adinet.com.uy http://adinet.com.uy to one of my toasters: Return-Path: dele...@adinet.com.uy mailto:dele...@adinet.com.uy mailto:dele...@adinet.com.uy mailto:dele...@adinet.com.uy Delivered-To: wi...@something.com mailto:wi...@something.com mailto:wi...@something.com mailto:wi...@something.com Received: (qmail 11069 invoked by uid 89); 24 Dec 2010 17:32:18 - Received: from unknown (HELO smtp-s04.adinet.com.uy http://smtp-s04.adinet.com.uy http://smtp-s04.adinet.com.uy) (200.40.30.64) by mx.something.com http://mx.something.com http://mx.something.com with SMTP; 24 Dec 2010 17:32:18 - Received-SPF: pass (mx.something.com http://mx.something.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: dovecot, spam and others...
Read carefully. Simscan is the software encharged to call spamassassin and clamav to scan each email. Spamassassin does not delete or reject any emails, it scans it and mark as spam depending on the score required by local.cf. Then Simscan does what you specify at its own config file. On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Cecil Yother, Jr. c...@yother.com wrote: Now, I'm thoroughly confused. What is the purpose of Simscan then if the file has already been scanned? If spamassassin rejects it at 5 what would Simscan ever do when it's set to 12? On 01/20/2011 09:51 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 01/20/2011 10:39 AM, Maxwell Smart wrote: That's what I meant. When Simscan is run it starts spamd to scan based on the hits number in the simcontrol file and then if it passes that spamassassin scans it again using the local .cf file. Is that correct? No. spamassassin only scans once. simscan applies spam_hits *after* spamassassin is done scanning. Basically Simscan is a gatekeeper/bouncer. If you don't get past Simscan you don't get the patdown by spamassassin. Not exactly. Simscan only rejects based on the result of the scanners that it invokes. local.cf comes first, then spam_hits. On 01/20/2011 09:32 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: No. simscan does no scanning. It simply takes action (rejects some messages) based on the result of scanners that in invokes (clamav and spamassassin). -- Cecil Yother, Jr. cj cj's 2318 Clement Ave Alameda, CA 94501 tel 510.865.2787 | http://yother.com Check out the new Volvo classified resource http://www.volvoclassified.com - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group ( www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: dovecot, spam and others...
I just realized the received mails are not being scaned by spamassasin and reading other mails I found spamdyke might be my problem. I'm also not receiving some mails because of RDNS checks. How can I disable or remove Spamdyke until I can set everything right? Bruno. On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Cecil Yother, Jr. c...@yother.com wrote: On 01/20/2011 10:45 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 01/20/2011 11:27 AM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote: Now, I'm thoroughly confused. What is the purpose of Simscan then if the file has already been scanned? Simscan does not itself do any scanning. It simply invokes other scanners. I got this part. The other scanners report back to simscan what the results were, and simscan takes the care of rejecting messages appropriately. Simscan isn't invoked after the scanners. Simscan invokes the other scanners, which subsequently return control back to simscan, which subsequently returns control back to qmail-smtpd. OK, now I understand If spamassassin rejects it at 5 what would Simscan ever do when it's set to 12? Spamassassin does no rejecting. SA simply scans and scores the message, adds header records, tags the subject line when appropriate (over 5), and returns control to simscan. It's simscan that does the rejecting, based on spam_hits. Woohoo, I got it! On 01/20/2011 09:51 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 01/20/2011 10:39 AM, Maxwell Smart wrote: That's what I meant. When Simscan is run it starts spamd to scan based on the hits number in the simcontrol file and then if it passes that spamassassin scans it again using the local .cf file. Is that correct? No. spamassassin only scans once. simscan applies spam_hits *after* spamassassin is done scanning. Basically Simscan is a gatekeeper/bouncer. If you don't get past Simscan you don't get the patdown by spamassassin. Not exactly. Simscan only rejects based on the result of the scanners that it invokes. local.cf comes first, then spam_hits. On 01/20/2011 09:32 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: No. simscan does no scanning. It simply takes action (rejects some messages) based on the result of scanners that in invokes (clamav and spamassassin). -- Cecil Yother, Jr. cj cj's 2318 Clement Ave Alameda, CA 94501 tel 510.865.2787 | http://yother.com Check out the new Volvo classified resource http://www.volvoclassified.com - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group ( www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: dovecot, spam and others...
Great! Thanks Eric! Bruno On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote: # cd /var/qmail/supervise/smtp # ln -sf run.dist run # service qmail restart This will disactivate spamdyke. To reactivate it, replace run.dist with run.spamdyke. You may need to tweak spamdyke's configuration a little to get it working ideally in your environment. Sometimes you need to whitelist mail servers that are misconfigured, etc. Any problem you have with spamdyke is usually easy to remedy by adjusting its configuration. -- -Eric 'shubes' On 01/20/2011 03:22 PM, Bruno De Leone wrote: I just realized the received mails are not being scaned by spamassasin and reading other mails I found spamdyke might be my problem. I'm also not receiving some mails because of RDNS checks. How can I disable or remove Spamdyke until I can set everything right? Bruno. On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Cecil Yother, Jr. c...@yother.com mailto:c...@yother.com wrote: On 01/20/2011 10:45 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 01/20/2011 11:27 AM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote: Now, I'm thoroughly confused. What is the purpose of Simscan then if the file has already been scanned? Simscan does not itself do any scanning. It simply invokes other scanners. I got this part. The other scanners report back to simscan what the results were, and simscan takes the care of rejecting messages appropriately. Simscan isn't invoked after the scanners. Simscan invokes the other scanners, which subsequently return control back to simscan, which subsequently returns control back to qmail-smtpd. OK, now I understand If spamassassin rejects it at 5 what would Simscan ever do when it's set to 12? Spamassassin does no rejecting. SA simply scans and scores the message, adds header records, tags the subject line when appropriate (over 5), and returns control to simscan. It's simscan that does the rejecting, based on spam_hits. Woohoo, I got it! On 01/20/2011 09:51 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 01/20/2011 10:39 AM, Maxwell Smart wrote: That's what I meant. When Simscan is run it starts spamd to scan based on the hits number in the simcontrol file and then if it passes that spamassassin scans it again using the local .cf file. Is that correct? No. spamassassin only scans once. simscan applies spam_hits *after* spamassassin is done scanning. Basically Simscan is a gatekeeper/bouncer. If you don't get past Simscan you don't get the patdown by spamassassin. Not exactly. Simscan only rejects based on the result of the scanners that it invokes. local.cf http://local.cf comes first, then spam_hits. On 01/20/2011 09:32 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: No. simscan does no scanning. It simply takes action (rejects some messages) based on the result of scanners that in invokes (clamav and spamassassin). -- Cecil Yother, Jr. cj cj's 2318 Clement Ave Alameda, CA 94501 tel 510.865.2787 | http://yother.com Check out the new Volvo classified resource http://www.volvoclassified.com - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com http://www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com http://qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com mailto:qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com mailto:qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group ( www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: dovecot, spam and others...
I disabled spamdyke and messages are arriving as before. I'll enable it again when I can make the configurations for it right. What worries me is that mails are not being scanned by spamassassin or clamav. I'm looking to the first test emails I sent when I finished installing both servers and I can't find any header indicating the emails were scanned. # cat /var/qmail/control/simcontrol :clam=yes,spam=yes,spam_hits=2000,attach=.zzz # cat /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf ok_locales all skip_rbl_checks 1 required_score 5 report_safe 0 rewrite_header Subject ***SPAM*** use_pyzor 1 use_auto_whitelist 1 use_bayes 1 use_bayes_rules 1 bayes_auto_learn 1 Here is an email I sent from an account at adinet.com.uy to one of my toasters: Return-Path: dele...@adinet.com.uy Delivered-To: wi...@something.com Received: (qmail 11069 invoked by uid 89); 24 Dec 2010 17:32:18 - Received: from unknown (HELO smtp-s04.adinet.com.uy) (200.40.30.64) by mx.something.com with SMTP; 24 Dec 2010 17:32:18 - Received-SPF: pass (mx.something.com: SPF record at adinet.com.uy designates 200.40.30.64 as permitted sender) Received: from fe-ps05 (192.168.2.209) by smtp-s04.adinet.com.uy(8.5.124.03) (authenticated as dele...@adinet.com.uy) id 4C7C4DE906BF2B95 for wi...@something.com; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 15:32:13 -0200 Received: from [190.135.66.162] by correo.adinet.com.uy via http; Fri Dec 24 14:32:12 UYT 2010 Message-ID: 19047404.1293211933059.JavaMail.tomcat@fe-ps05 Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 14:32:13 -0300 (UYT) From: dele...@adinet.com.uy dele...@adinet.com.uy Reply-To: dele...@adinet.com.uy dele...@adinet.com.uy To: wi...@something.com Subject: hola! MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 190.135.66.162 Is there something I might have missed while installing spamassassin for it to run properly? Bruno On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Bruno De Leone dele...@gmail.com wrote: Great! Thanks Eric! Bruno On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote: # cd /var/qmail/supervise/smtp # ln -sf run.dist run # service qmail restart This will disactivate spamdyke. To reactivate it, replace run.dist with run.spamdyke. You may need to tweak spamdyke's configuration a little to get it working ideally in your environment. Sometimes you need to whitelist mail servers that are misconfigured, etc. Any problem you have with spamdyke is usually easy to remedy by adjusting its configuration. -- -Eric 'shubes' On 01/20/2011 03:22 PM, Bruno De Leone wrote: I just realized the received mails are not being scaned by spamassasin and reading other mails I found spamdyke might be my problem. I'm also not receiving some mails because of RDNS checks. How can I disable or remove Spamdyke until I can set everything right? Bruno. On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Cecil Yother, Jr. c...@yother.com mailto:c...@yother.com wrote: On 01/20/2011 10:45 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 01/20/2011 11:27 AM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote: Now, I'm thoroughly confused. What is the purpose of Simscan then if the file has already been scanned? Simscan does not itself do any scanning. It simply invokes other scanners. I got this part. The other scanners report back to simscan what the results were, and simscan takes the care of rejecting messages appropriately. Simscan isn't invoked after the scanners. Simscan invokes the other scanners, which subsequently return control back to simscan, which subsequently returns control back to qmail-smtpd. OK, now I understand If spamassassin rejects it at 5 what would Simscan ever do when it's set to 12? Spamassassin does no rejecting. SA simply scans and scores the message, adds header records, tags the subject line when appropriate (over 5), and returns control to simscan. It's simscan that does the rejecting, based on spam_hits. Woohoo, I got it! On 01/20/2011 09:51 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 01/20/2011 10:39 AM, Maxwell Smart wrote: That's what I meant. When Simscan is run it starts spamd to scan based on the hits number in the simcontrol file and then if it passes that spamassassin scans it again using the local .cf file. Is that correct? No. spamassassin only scans once. simscan applies spam_hits *after* spamassassin is done scanning. Basically Simscan is a gatekeeper/bouncer. If you don't get past Simscan you don't get the patdown by spamassassin. Not exactly. Simscan only rejects based on the result of the scanners that it invokes. local.cf http://local.cf comes first, then spam_hits. On 01/20/2011 09:32 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: No. simscan does no scanning. It simply takes action (rejects some messages
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: dovecot, spam and others...
Yes I did rebuild, reload and just in case restart. Before I had the original spam_hits=12 and other banned attachments but it was the same. On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Cecil Yother, Jr. c...@yother.com wrote: did you rebuild your cdb? On 01/20/2011 04:12 PM, Bruno De Leone wrote: I disabled spamdyke and messages are arriving as before. I'll enable it again when I can make the configurations for it right. What worries me is that mails are not being scanned by spamassassin or clamav. I'm looking to the first test emails I sent when I finished installing both servers and I can't find any header indicating the emails were scanned. # cat /var/qmail/control/simcontrol :clam=yes,spam=yes,spam_hits=2000,attach=.zzz # cat /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf ok_locales all skip_rbl_checks 1 required_score 5 report_safe 0 rewrite_header Subject ***SPAM*** use_pyzor 1 use_auto_whitelist 1 use_bayes 1 use_bayes_rules 1 bayes_auto_learn 1 Here is an email I sent from an account at adinet.com.uy to one of my toasters: Return-Path: dele...@adinet.com.uy Delivered-To: wi...@something.com Received: (qmail 11069 invoked by uid 89); 24 Dec 2010 17:32:18 - Received: from unknown (HELO smtp-s04.adinet.com.uy) (200.40.30.64) by mx.something.com with SMTP; 24 Dec 2010 17:32:18 - Received-SPF: pass (mx.something.com: SPF record at adinet.com.uydesignates 200.40.30.64 as permitted sender) Received: from fe-ps05 (192.168.2.209) by smtp-s04.adinet.com.uy(8.5.124.03) (authenticated as dele...@adinet.com.uy) id 4C7C4DE906BF2B95 for wi...@something.com; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 15:32:13 -0200 Received: from [190.135.66.162] by correo.adinet.com.uy via http; Fri Dec 24 14:32:12 UYT 2010 Message-ID: 19047404.1293211933059.JavaMail.tomcat@fe-ps05 Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 14:32:13 -0300 (UYT) From: dele...@adinet.com.uy dele...@adinet.com.uy Reply-To: dele...@adinet.com.uy dele...@adinet.com.uy To: wi...@something.com Subject: hola! MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 190.135.66.162 Is there something I might have missed while installing spamassassin for it to run properly? Bruno On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Bruno De Leone dele...@gmail.com wrote: Great! Thanks Eric! Bruno On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote: # cd /var/qmail/supervise/smtp # ln -sf run.dist run # service qmail restart This will disactivate spamdyke. To reactivate it, replace run.dist with run.spamdyke. You may need to tweak spamdyke's configuration a little to get it working ideally in your environment. Sometimes you need to whitelist mail servers that are misconfigured, etc. Any problem you have with spamdyke is usually easy to remedy by adjusting its configuration. -- -Eric 'shubes' On 01/20/2011 03:22 PM, Bruno De Leone wrote: I just realized the received mails are not being scaned by spamassasin and reading other mails I found spamdyke might be my problem. I'm also not receiving some mails because of RDNS checks. How can I disable or remove Spamdyke until I can set everything right? Bruno. On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Cecil Yother, Jr. c...@yother.com mailto:c...@yother.com wrote: On 01/20/2011 10:45 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 01/20/2011 11:27 AM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote: Now, I'm thoroughly confused. What is the purpose of Simscan then if the file has already been scanned? Simscan does not itself do any scanning. It simply invokes other scanners. I got this part. The other scanners report back to simscan what the results were, and simscan takes the care of rejecting messages appropriately. Simscan isn't invoked after the scanners. Simscan invokes the other scanners, which subsequently return control back to simscan, which subsequently returns control back to qmail-smtpd. OK, now I understand If spamassassin rejects it at 5 what would Simscan ever do when it's set to 12? Spamassassin does no rejecting. SA simply scans and scores the message, adds header records, tags the subject line when appropriate (over 5), and returns control to simscan. It's simscan that does the rejecting, based on spam_hits. Woohoo, I got it! On 01/20/2011 09:51 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 01/20/2011 10:39 AM, Maxwell Smart wrote: That's what I meant. When Simscan is run it starts spamd to scan based on the hits number in the simcontrol file and then if it passes that spamassassin scans it again using the local .cf file. Is that correct? No. spamassassin only scans once. simscan applies spam_hits *after* spamassassin is done scanning. Basically Simscan is a gatekeeper/bouncer. If you don't get past Simscan you don't get
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: dovecot, spam and others...
Hi Eric, thanks a lot for your answer. It helped me a lot! I'm back from my vacations so hands to my servers again... About quotas and displaying it at the webmail it is not that important. If it works great, if not, is not that necessary... After solving other issues I'll have a look at the new versions of vpopmail too. I installed qtp and spamdyke, it was so easy that I want to qtp-conquerworld... but is not there yet =( I also found how to enable the spambox and reinstalled the qmailadmin but I wasn't able to find where to configure the score for the simscan which is still rejecting all spam messages. Where can I set a higher score for the simscan? About the Horde package you mentioned, I'm not very interested because of a personal dislike :P. I tried Roundcube Webmail and I found it very good looking. I installed it at my smaller mail server running the original courier packages and it runs great, I love it. I tried it after at the bigger mail server with dovecot and %TG!!!, is SO slow, almost unusable. I think there might be some timeout when it asks for the quota information that is not being sent by the dovecot service or it has to be asked for differently. Did someone tried Dovecot 2 with a qmailtoaster? I'm running 1.2.16... I'll try to have a look at this because I'd like very much to be able to use Roundcube at the big mail server so if someone has any information about how quotas are managed by courier/dovecot/webmails it will be welcome :D Bruno On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote: On 12/30/2010 11:36 AM, Bruno De Leone wrote: Hi all! Hey Bruno. Welcome to the QMT community. I'm kind of new with qmailtoaster and it has been a great experience so far. I installed it firstly on a large server with 1000 mail accounts and it works perfectly. I had at the begining some issues with large inboxes (50k + mails), no webmail was able to open it, the imap server always timed out. I tried replacing Courier with Dovecot and voilà! No more problems with webmails or nothing. Now I have a new server installed for a smaller site and I found out that with Courier, Squirrelmail is able to read and display the space used/left which if I install Dovecot it is not able to do it. So now I have my doubts if I will leave Courier or replace it with Dovecot... I like best the Dovecot servers but I don't have any other complains about Courier than the issue with the first server I installed. QMT will be using Dovecot in the future (Courier has dropped vpopmail support), so I'd stick with Dovecot. Is it possible to configure the squirrelmail or dovecot to display the space left/used at the webmail? I don't know off hand how SM acquires this info, and wasn't aware that it's unavailable w/ dovecot. You're welcome to have a go at fixing it yourself if you're so inclined. Someone else here might look into it as well. Any other thoughts or experiences about Dovecot/Courier might help me. Presently, quotas on QMT don't work right. I'm looking into upgrading vpopmail in order to fix this, but haven't yet decided to use vpopmail 5.4.32 or to try v5.5.x, which is not yet 'stable'. I think fixing quotas should be done first, then we can look into why it is that SM doesn't show this data with dovecot. Also, you might want to know that there is a project barely underway to package Horde webmail for QMT. I hope to get that project going again soon. Another doubt I'm having is what happens with mails found as spam. If my tests were correct, they are being deleted. Is it possible to create a Junk folder to every user and tell spamassasin to move spam mails there? There is a 'spambox' option which is part of qmailadmin-toaster. Search the wiki (http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com) for spambox, and you'll find information about implementing it. I could make some sort of script to create a Junk maildir to every user, there's no much difficult there. But is it possible to tell the filters to move spam to a junk box?? The spambox option does all of this for you. I there a mailing list log? Where can I read it? http://www.mail-archive.com/qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com/ http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.toaster Any other suggestions about something cool to add to my qmailtoasters are also welcome. Thanks in advance for any help and have a great 2011!!! :D Be sure to have qmailtoaster-plus (http://qtp.qmailtoaster.com) installed, and use qtp-install-spamdyke to install spamdyke. If I had to choose only one anti-spam tool, it'd be spamdyke. Once again, welcome Bruno. -- -Eric 'shubes' - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group ( www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: dovecot, spam and others...
/var/qmail/control/simcontrol is like this: :clam=yes,spam=yes,spam_hits=12,attach=.mp3:.src:.bat:.pif Anyone knows what this does exactly? Is it the spam_hits the spam score needed to drop mails by the simscan? CJ, there is no appropriate file. It depends in what you are trying to do. Bruno On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Cecil Yother, Jr. c...@yother.com wrote: Well that explains why when I changed it nothing appeared to happen. I read that and thought that the local.cf was the appropriate file. So is the /var/qmail/simcontrol spamhits setting the setting that needs to be lower than the local.cf file? On 01/19/2011 04:34 PM, Bruno De Leone wrote: CJ, /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf isn't only for spamassasin? I need to change the simscan score. http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/FAQs#I_upgraded_my_QmailToaster_to_the_latest_and_I_no_longer_have_the_.22Spam_Detection.22_box_in_Qmailadmin . It is also worth noting that the default Simscan config is set to reject spam messages at the same score as the mailfilter script. You will need to change the simcontrol default score to a higher value to allow spam messages to be processed by the mailfilter script or the spambox option will have no visible effect. Thanks, Bruno On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Cecil Yother, Jr. c...@yother.com wrote: Bruno, The spam threshold can be found in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf You'll need to restart spamassassin after modifying. Roundcube looks nice, but has had some security issues. Not sure it's ready for primetime yet. CJ On 01/19/2011 02:40 PM, Bruno De Leone wrote: Hi Eric, thanks a lot for your answer. It helped me a lot! I'm back from my vacations so hands to my servers again... About quotas and displaying it at the webmail it is not that important. If it works great, if not, is not that necessary... After solving other issues I'll have a look at the new versions of vpopmail too. I installed qtp and spamdyke, it was so easy that I want to qtp-conquerworld... but is not there yet =( I also found how to enable the spambox and reinstalled the qmailadmin but I wasn't able to find where to configure the score for the simscan which is still rejecting all spam messages. Where can I set a higher score for the simscan? About the Horde package you mentioned, I'm not very interested because of a personal dislike :P. I tried Roundcube Webmail and I found it very good looking. I installed it at my smaller mail server running the original courier packages and it runs great, I love it. I tried it after at the bigger mail server with dovecot and %TG!!!, is SO slow, almost unusable. I think there might be some timeout when it asks for the quota information that is not being sent by the dovecot service or it has to be asked for differently. Did someone tried Dovecot 2 with a qmailtoaster? I'm running 1.2.16... I'll try to have a look at this because I'd like very much to be able to use Roundcube at the big mail server so if someone has any information about how quotas are managed by courier/dovecot/webmails it will be welcome :D Bruno On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote: On 12/30/2010 11:36 AM, Bruno De Leone wrote: Hi all! Hey Bruno. Welcome to the QMT community. I'm kind of new with qmailtoaster and it has been a great experience so far. I installed it firstly on a large server with 1000 mail accounts and it works perfectly. I had at the begining some issues with large inboxes (50k + mails), no webmail was able to open it, the imap server always timed out. I tried replacing Courier with Dovecot and voilà! No more problems with webmails or nothing. Now I have a new server installed for a smaller site and I found out that with Courier, Squirrelmail is able to read and display the space used/left which if I install Dovecot it is not able to do it. So now I have my doubts if I will leave Courier or replace it with Dovecot... I like best the Dovecot servers but I don't have any other complains about Courier than the issue with the first server I installed. QMT will be using Dovecot in the future (Courier has dropped vpopmail support), so I'd stick with Dovecot. Is it possible to configure the squirrelmail or dovecot to display the space left/used at the webmail? I don't know off hand how SM acquires this info, and wasn't aware that it's unavailable w/ dovecot. You're welcome to have a go at fixing it yourself if you're so inclined. Someone else here might look into it as well. Any other thoughts or experiences about Dovecot/Courier might help me. Presently, quotas on QMT don't work right. I'm looking into upgrading vpopmail in order to fix this, but haven't yet decided to use vpopmail 5.4.32 or to try v5.5.x, which is not yet 'stable'. I think fixing quotas should be done first, then we can look into why it is that SM doesn't show this data with dovecot. Also
Re: [qmailtoaster] Something wrong in wiki land!
=== [http://www.discount-lenses.com/halloween-contact-lenses.php Halloween Contact Lenses] === That was the code posted where now it shows dsa On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 2:20 AM, Khan Mohamed Ashraf kmash...@gmail.comwrote: I confirm the same. Just checked. A link has been added. I must say that lately LAMP stacks need a high degree of securing and maintenance. Lots of LAMP stacks being hacked quite easily due to poor maintenance. Don't get me wrong I am not casting aspersions, but saying this out of my own experience. Ashraf On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Scott Hughes sonicscott9...@gmail.comwrote: I was just looking at our QMT wiki pages and noticed that someone or something had added a new section. It's title: Halloween Contact Lenses I could be WAY off base here, but I do not think that this is a viable topic for QMT. The page is: http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Main_Page#User_Tips_.26_Tricks Scott -- Khan Md. Ashraf First Floor, New #8 Old #12, 9th Cross Street, Shastrinagar, Chennai 600 020 India Tel: 91 44 24462713, 43018713, 42029358 Mobile: 91 9841032607
[qmailtoaster] dovecot, spam and others...
Hi all! I'm kind of new with qmailtoaster and it has been a great experience so far. I installed it firstly on a large server with 1000 mail accounts and it works perfectly. I had at the begining some issues with large inboxes (50k + mails), no webmail was able to open it, the imap server always timed out. I tried replacing Courier with Dovecot and voilà! No more problems with webmails or nothing. Now I have a new server installed for a smaller site and I found out that with Courier, Squirrelmail is able to read and display the space used/left which if I install Dovecot it is not able to do it. So now I have my doubts if I will leave Courier or replace it with Dovecot... I like best the Dovecot servers but I don't have any other complains about Courier than the issue with the first server I installed. Is it possible to configure the squirrelmail or dovecot to display the space left/used at the webmail? Any other thoughts or experiences about Dovecot/Courier might help me. Another doubt I'm having is what happens with mails found as spam. If my tests were correct, they are being deleted. Is it possible to create a Junk folder to every user and tell spamassasin to move spam mails there? I could make some sort of script to create a Junk maildir to every user, there's no much difficult there. But is it possible to tell the filters to move spam to a junk box?? I there a mailing list log? Where can I read it? Any other suggestions about something cool to add to my qmailtoasters are also welcome. Thanks in advance for any help and have a great 2011!!! :D
