[R] lm without intercept, false R-squared
Hi is there a command that calculates the correct adjusted R-squared, when I work without intercept? (The R-squared from lm without intercept is false.) Greetings Chrsitof __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] lm without intercept, false R-squared
On 27.06.2012 09:33, Christof Kluß wrote: Hi is there a command that calculates the correct adjusted R-squared, when I work without intercept? (The R-squared from lm without intercept is false.) Then we need your definition of your version of correct - we know the definition of your version of false. Best, Uwe Ligges Greetings Chrsitof __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] lm without intercept, false R-squared
On 06/27/2012 10:33 AM, Christof Kluß wrote: Hi is there a command that calculates the correct adjusted R-squared, when I work without intercept? (The R-squared from lm without intercept is false.) Hi! This answer in R-FAQ might help you: http://cran.r-project.org/doc/FAQ/R-FAQ.html#Why-does-summary_0028_0029-report-strange-results-for-the-R_005e2-estimate-when-I-fit-a-linear-model-with-no-intercept_003f -- Mikko Korpela Aalto University School of Science Department of Information and Computer Science __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] lm without intercept, false R-squared
On Jun 27, 2012, at 09:33 , Christof Kluß wrote: Hi is there a command that calculates the correct adjusted R-squared, when I work without intercept? (The R-squared from lm without intercept is false.) When people say that, they are usually implying that a correct R-squared can be negative! If for some reason you want to use an alternative *definition* of R^2, it should be easy enough to calculate it yourself, e.g. (if the proportion reduction in variance is wanted): Y - rnorm(100, 10, 1) x - 1:100 (var(Y) - summary(lm(Y~x-1))$sigma^2)/var(Y) (comes out as -31 or so) -- Peter Dalgaard, Professor, Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark Phone: (+45)38153501 Email: pd@cbs.dk Priv: pda...@gmail.com __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] lm without intercept, false R-squared
for example the same model with intercept R² = 0.6, without intercept R² = 0.9 and higher. In my definition of R², R² has to be equal or less without intercept I do not know what R shows, but in the summary of the model without intercept it does not show the R² of the regression line. When I run a regression I like to have the R² of the regression line and not something else. ;) Am 27-06-2012 10:25, schrieb Uwe Ligges: On 27.06.2012 09:33, Christof Kluß wrote: Hi is there a command that calculates the correct adjusted R-squared, when I work without intercept? (The R-squared from lm without intercept is false.) Then we need your definition of your version of correct - we know the definition of your version of false. Best, Uwe Ligges Greetings Chrsitof __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. -- Dipl.-Inf. Christof Kluß (Raum 223) | Universität Kiel Inst. für Pflanzenbau und -züchtung | www.gfo.uni-kiel.de Grünland u. Futterbau/Ökol. Landbau | ckl...@gfo.uni-kiel.de Hermann-Rodewald Str. 9, 24118 Kiel | Tel. 0431 880-2197 __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] lm without intercept, false R-squared
On 27.06.2012 10:36, Christof Kluß wrote: for example the same model with intercept R² = 0.6, without intercept R² = 0.9 and higher. In my definition of R², R² has to be equal or less without intercept I do not know what R shows, but in the summary of the model without intercept it does not show the R² of the regression line. When I run a regression I like to have the R² of the regression line and not something else. ;) Ah, now I understand your question, see ?summary.lm: r.squared: R^2, the ‘fraction of variance explained by the model’, R^2 = 1 - Sum(R[i]^2) / Sum((y[i]- y*)^2), where y* is the mean of y[i] if there is an intercept and zero otherwise. With your definition of R^2 you can use: 1 - crossprod(residuals(model)) / crossprod(y - mean(y)) while R uses: 1 - crossprod(residuals(model)) / crossprod(y - 0) Best, Uwe Ligges Am 27-06-2012 10:25, schrieb Uwe Ligges: On 27.06.2012 09:33, Christof Kluß wrote: Hi is there a command that calculates the correct adjusted R-squared, when I work without intercept? (The R-squared from lm without intercept is false.) Then we need your definition of your version of correct - we know the definition of your version of false. Best, Uwe Ligges Greetings Chrsitof __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] lm without intercept, false R-squared
On Jun 27, 2012, at 13:15 , Uwe Ligges wrote: 1 - crossprod(residuals(model)) / crossprod(y - mean(y)) And the reason why that is not used in R: y- rnorm(100,10,1) x - 1:100 model - lm(y~x-1) 1 - crossprod(residuals(model)) / crossprod(y - mean(y)) [,1] [1,] -27.60012 -- Peter Dalgaard, Professor Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark Phone: (+45)38153501 Email: pd@cbs.dk Priv: pda...@gmail.com __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] lm without intercept, false R-squared
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 4:36 AM, Christof Kluß ckl...@email.uni-kiel.de wrote: for example the same model with intercept R² = 0.6, without intercept R² = 0.9 and higher. In my definition of R², R² has to be equal or less without intercept I do not know what R shows, but in the summary of the model without intercept it does not show the R² of the regression line. When I run a regression I like to have the R² of the regression line and not something else. ;) If we use a baseline with no intercept in the R^2 definition then adding the intercept will always improve the R^2 or at least not make the R^2 worse. The following r.squared.0 function defines such an R^2. It will agree with the R^2 produced by R when used with models having no intercept but will give a different R^2 value for models with an intercept. r.squared.0 - function(fm) c(1 / (1 + crossprod(resid(fm)) / crossprod(fitted(fm fm1 - lm(demand ~ Time, BOD) fm0 - lm(demand ~ Time-1, BOD) r.squared.0(fm0) r.squared.0(fm1) # adding intercept increases r.squared.0 # for comparison # summary(fm0) uses same defn as r.squared.0 # but summary(fm1) does not summary(fm0)$r.squared # does agree with ours summary(fm1)$r.squared # does not agree with ours -- Statistics Software Consulting GKX Group, GKX Associates Inc. tel: 1-877-GKX-GROUP email: ggrothendieck at gmail.com __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] lm without intercept, false R-squared
for example the same model with intercept R² = 0.6, without intercept R² = 0.9 and higher. In my definition of R², R² has to be equal or less without intercept I do not know what R shows, but in the summary of the model without intercept it does not show the R² of the regression line. When I run a regression I like to have the R² of the regression line and not something else. ;) Am 27-06-2012 10:25, schrieb Uwe Ligges: On 27.06.2012 09:33, Christof Kluß wrote: Hi is there a command that calculates the correct adjusted R-squared, when I work without intercept? (The R-squared from lm without intercept is false.) Then we need your definition of your version of correct - we know the definition of your version of false. Best, Uwe Ligges Greetings Chrsitof __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. -- Dipl.-Inf. Christof Kluß (Raum 223) | Universität Kiel Inst. für Pflanzenbau und -züchtung | www.gfo.uni-kiel.de Grünland u. Futterbau/Ökol. Landbau | ckl...@gfo.uni-kiel.de Hermann-Rodewald Str. 9, 24118 Kiel | Tel. 0431 880-2197 __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
