[RBW] Re: Freewheel Skipping

2010-02-02 Thread Angus
Thanks to all for the thoughtful replies.

I believe it was the pawls inside the freewheel that skipped.  There
is no gunk build up or visible wear on the cogs, no measureable wear
on the chain.

I'll give the soaking the FW in solvent technique a go.

Thanks!

Angus

On Feb 1, 12:41 pm, CycloFiend cyclofi...@earthlink.net wrote:
 on 2/1/10 2:51 AM, Angus at angusle...@sbcglobal.net wrote:

  I was riding my Atlantis yesterday and during one hard effort (it's
  all relative) the freewheel skippedchunk!  It's an old Suntour 7
  speed freewheel that has probably given reliable service for decades.
  I had this happen to another Suntour freewheel several years ago and
  when it became too regular I replaced it.  Which lead to the
  question...

  With a skipping freewheel, how long do you let it go before replacing
  the freewheel?

 Just to confirm, you are saying that the pawls are slipping internally, not
 that the chain is slipping on a given cog, right?

 It depends a bit how the thing is slipping.  If there's a crunchy noise and
 the pedals jump just a bit, I'm likely to let it go for a while. The more
 pedal jump, the more dangerous, IMO.

 The freewheel is either going to freeze up or let go entirely. The former
 just means a little fixed gear work on the way home (though doing that with
 the slack chain in a derailleur setup can be tricky). The latter usually
 means body onto frame in one manner or the other.

 I guess the short answer is sooner rather than later...

 hope that helps,

 - J

 --
 Jim Edgar
 cyclofi...@earthlink.net

 Cyclofiend Bicycle Photo Galleries -http://www.cyclofiend.com
 Current Classics - Cross Bikes
 Singlespeed - Working Bikes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: TCO in general..

2010-02-02 Thread Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery
One of the non-Riv bikes we sell comes standard with clips and straps
(we should really take them off). Last Summer a guy came in to test
one, so I aired up the tires, offered a helmet (declined), and away he
went. When he returned, both he and the bike were scraped up.
Apparently, the TC got caught in the fender, and he went down. I
really can't imagine what maneuver he was trying to execute (track
stand?), and on the 50 or so times I've ridden one of those bikes, I
never noticed a TCO issue or experienced anything remotely resembling
a TCO difficulty.

On Feb 2, 1:36 am, Grant Petersen gr...@rivbike.com wrote:
 Seems to be a problem because it has a name/acronym. All it means is that at
 speeds less than about 6mph, if you turn the wheel enough and time it just
 wrong with your pedal stroke, your shoe hits the fender or tire. It's one of
 those things that sounds worse than it is. It cannot happen at faster
 speeds, because you don't turn the wheel that much except if you're doing a
 near or full U-turn. When you go around a hairpin at 17 mph, you turn the
 front wheel maybe 1.5-degees. It is ONLY at SUPER slow speeds and super
 sharp turns that you can make contact.

 I want to say this, because it even being a topic of discussion suggests
 that there's something wrong. At the risk of being gross or something, it's
 sort of like, I have mucus coming out of my face--what can I do? What's
 wrong with me? And the answer is blow your nose. But TCO (a term I've
 used a hundred times, by the way) is mucus coming out of face in a
 different context.

 In a bike like the Atlantis, or any fatty tire bike, the designer, at some
 point, comes to a fork in the road. He can design for NO TCO and compromise
 the elements of design that affect position and fit and ride; or he can
 design for P, F, and R and accept some TCO.

 Or, just go to a smaller wheel. But even that involves some value
 judgements. A 58cm Atlantis with a 26--inch wheel would have a monster-long
 head tube that would look funny and make the bike less suitable to load
 carrying than the 700C wheel version (with a longer fork and hence shorter
 head tube). As it is, the 58 is a really well triangulated frame, and the
 bike rides like a demon (my opinion, but I am biased).

 TCO ends up being a problem---in my opinion---only in theoretics, but not in
 practice. THere are some builders who would disagree; and although in the
 spirit of diplomacy and reasonableness and agreeing to disagree and all
 that, I accept thatI can't understand it. To fear TCO or to regard it as
 Dangerouswell, it's ust something that to me doesn't make any sense.

 I'm not saying anybody here fears it. I haven't read all the posts and
 prolly won't...I just clicked on this thread for the heck of it, read
 something, and now.ahhhshouldn't have said anything! Will regret it
 in the morning. Going to bed. Goodnight, Moon.

 Best,

 G

 --
 Grant
 Rivendell Bicycle Workswww.rivbike.com925 933 7304

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Couple outdoor QB pics

2010-02-02 Thread Frederick, Steve
I got out for a bit saturday--only ten or so miles twiddling around on our 
local MUP and over to my favorite bike shop to show it off.  It was 18 degrees 
so ten miles seemed sufficient!

Changed a couple of things--put a Dos Eno freewheel on for two speeds that 
don't require as much wheel movement which in turn allowed me to clean up the 
rear fender line a bit.  (utilizing SKS quickreleases to allow wheel removal.)  
And I switched to a more conventional double crank (Sugino XD) and lost the 
chain guard but gained a bit bigger inner ring, which was a big help.  Now I 
can cruise comfortably around 11-14mph whereas with the stock setup I was 
spinning out around 11mph which is just too low a gear for my local terrain...

The bike is sooo comforatble--I really love it!  And it's every bit as purty as 
my Orange Rambouillet in a bit more understated way...

Fresh, snowy pics:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/40738...@n08/4316446711/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/40738...@n08/4317180490/

Next change I'm considering is adding interrupter levers for braking 
versatility...

Steve Frederick, East Lansing, MI

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Franklin Canyon Ride

2010-02-02 Thread rperks
We could work out one a similar ride, but shift it north a bit, the
further you are away from the city the less cars you see for sure.
That being said I have only been on the roads closer to the 23, with
lots of riding in sycamaore canyon - 
http://venturacountytrails.org/TrailMaps/Sycamore/AreaTrails.htm

This is about 30 minutes closer ro LA than coming all the way out to
Ventura where I have been proposing another ride on the flickr group

Rob

On Feb 1, 5:51 pm, Aaron Thomas aaron.a.tho...@gmail.com wrote:
 We did a ride like similar to this on a previous SoCal ride, but we
 cut through Topanga (or was it Temescal?) in order to avoid so much
 distance on PCH, which can be hairy with all the Mel Gibson-style
 daytime drunks.

 It would be great if we could figure out a way to tack on that kind of
 distance, but do so in a way that keeps PCH exposure to a minimum.
 Anyone have any ideas?

 On Feb 1, 2:48 pm, Brad Gantt brdg...@gmail.com wrote:



  Okay, here's one option for an epic day in the hills. I have ridden
  all of this many times before but never all in one go. I'm going to
  try this in a couple of weeks, weather permitting.

 http://www.mapmyride.com/route/us/ca/los%20angeles/858126505202170833- Hide 
 quoted text -

 - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: TCO in general..

2010-02-02 Thread JoelMatthews
When pictures of my Hilsen first showed up on Cyclofiend, someone e-
mailed me a brief - 'Wow.  How's that TCO doing ya?' Or something
generally in that line.  Presumably the author meant to make me feel
bad for having bought the bike.

Two problems with the effort.  First, with its 32 tires and SKS
fenders a 59 Hilsen does not have TCO.  Second, even if it did, as
Grant points out, so what.  Obviously designers do not build a bike
intending to have TCO.  But there are many other design elements more
important than avoiding the occasional toe clip fender knock.

On Feb 2, 1:36 am, Grant Petersen gr...@rivbike.com wrote:
 Seems to be a problem because it has a name/acronym. All it means is that at
 speeds less than about 6mph, if you turn the wheel enough and time it just
 wrong with your pedal stroke, your shoe hits the fender or tire. It's one of
 those things that sounds worse than it is. It cannot happen at faster
 speeds, because you don't turn the wheel that much except if you're doing a
 near or full U-turn. When you go around a hairpin at 17 mph, you turn the
 front wheel maybe 1.5-degees. It is ONLY at SUPER slow speeds and super
 sharp turns that you can make contact.

 I want to say this, because it even being a topic of discussion suggests
 that there's something wrong. At the risk of being gross or something, it's
 sort of like, I have mucus coming out of my face--what can I do? What's
 wrong with me? And the answer is blow your nose. But TCO (a term I've
 used a hundred times, by the way) is mucus coming out of face in a
 different context.

 In a bike like the Atlantis, or any fatty tire bike, the designer, at some
 point, comes to a fork in the road. He can design for NO TCO and compromise
 the elements of design that affect position and fit and ride; or he can
 design for P, F, and R and accept some TCO.

 Or, just go to a smaller wheel. But even that involves some value
 judgements. A 58cm Atlantis with a 26--inch wheel would have a monster-long
 head tube that would look funny and make the bike less suitable to load
 carrying than the 700C wheel version (with a longer fork and hence shorter
 head tube). As it is, the 58 is a really well triangulated frame, and the
 bike rides like a demon (my opinion, but I am biased).

 TCO ends up being a problem---in my opinion---only in theoretics, but not in
 practice. THere are some builders who would disagree; and although in the
 spirit of diplomacy and reasonableness and agreeing to disagree and all
 that, I accept thatI can't understand it. To fear TCO or to regard it as
 Dangerouswell, it's ust something that to me doesn't make any sense.

 I'm not saying anybody here fears it. I haven't read all the posts and
 prolly won't...I just clicked on this thread for the heck of it, read
 something, and now.ahhhshouldn't have said anything! Will regret it
 in the morning. Going to bed. Goodnight, Moon.

 Best,

 G

 --
 Grant
 Rivendell Bicycle Workswww.rivbike.com
 925 933 7304

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: TCO in general..

2010-02-02 Thread newenglandbike
Some of the people I know who ride ultra-short-wheelbase fixed-gear
bikes w/clips have what seems like whole foot overlap, but they manage
in boston traffic nonetheless.   I know from experience that riding in
this traffic must involve some serious weaving and sharp cuts of the
wheel left/right. But these folks do it anyway and they're still
alive, so it must be something you can learn to cope with pretty
easily.



On Feb 2, 6:58 am, Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery thill@gmail.com
wrote:
 One of the non-Riv bikes we sell comes standard with clips and straps
 (we should really take them off). Last Summer a guy came in to test
 one, so I aired up the tires, offered a helmet (declined), and away he
 went. When he returned, both he and the bike were scraped up.
 Apparently, the TC got caught in the fender, and he went down. I
 really can't imagine what maneuver he was trying to execute (track
 stand?), and on the 50 or so times I've ridden one of those bikes, I
 never noticed a TCO issue or experienced anything remotely resembling
 a TCO difficulty.

 On Feb 2, 1:36 am, Grant Petersen gr...@rivbike.com wrote:

  Seems to be a problem because it has a name/acronym. All it means is that at
  speeds less than about 6mph, if you turn the wheel enough and time it just
  wrong with your pedal stroke, your shoe hits the fender or tire. It's one of
  those things that sounds worse than it is. It cannot happen at faster
  speeds, because you don't turn the wheel that much except if you're doing a
  near or full U-turn. When you go around a hairpin at 17 mph, you turn the
  front wheel maybe 1.5-degees. It is ONLY at SUPER slow speeds and super
  sharp turns that you can make contact.

  I want to say this, because it even being a topic of discussion suggests
  that there's something wrong. At the risk of being gross or something, it's
  sort of like, I have mucus coming out of my face--what can I do? What's
  wrong with me? And the answer is blow your nose. But TCO (a term I've
  used a hundred times, by the way) is mucus coming out of face in a
  different context.

  In a bike like the Atlantis, or any fatty tire bike, the designer, at some
  point, comes to a fork in the road. He can design for NO TCO and compromise
  the elements of design that affect position and fit and ride; or he can
  design for P, F, and R and accept some TCO.

  Or, just go to a smaller wheel. But even that involves some value
  judgements. A 58cm Atlantis with a 26--inch wheel would have a monster-long
  head tube that would look funny and make the bike less suitable to load
  carrying than the 700C wheel version (with a longer fork and hence shorter
  head tube). As it is, the 58 is a really well triangulated frame, and the
  bike rides like a demon (my opinion, but I am biased).

  TCO ends up being a problem---in my opinion---only in theoretics, but not in
  practice. THere are some builders who would disagree; and although in the
  spirit of diplomacy and reasonableness and agreeing to disagree and all
  that, I accept thatI can't understand it. To fear TCO or to regard it as
  Dangerouswell, it's ust something that to me doesn't make any sense.

  I'm not saying anybody here fears it. I haven't read all the posts and
  prolly won't...I just clicked on this thread for the heck of it, read
  something, and now.ahhhshouldn't have said anything! Will regret it
  in the morning. Going to bed. Goodnight, Moon.

  Best,

  G

  --
  Grant
  Rivendell Bicycle Workswww.rivbike.com925933 7304

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



RE: [RBW] 9speed to 8 speed cassettes

2010-02-02 Thread Frederick, Steve
I use 7 cogs from an 8 speed SRAM cassette and the spacers from a worn out 7 
speed Shimano cassette on my Bridgestone and it works just fine!
 
Steve Frederick, East Lansing, MI

-Original Message-
From: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com 
[mailto:rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com]on Behalf Of cyclotourist
Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 4:00 PM
To: RBW Owners Bunch
Subject: [RBW] 9speed to 8 speed cassettes


A combination of pushing my bike up hill yesterday and the new 12-36 cassette 
in the latest Reader has me thinking...

Can I put 8 speed spacers between the cogs of a nine speed cassette and 
simply leave off the smallest cog? My current 8 speed cassette is a 12-32 XTR 
(on a spider), and I'd love to get a 34 or even 36 low.  I would never need an 
11T high, and very rarely use a 12T.

-- 
Cheers,
David
Redlands, CA

Bicycling is a big part of the future. It has to be. There is something wrong 
with a society that drives a car to workout in a gym.  ~Bill Nye, scientist guy




-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Cleaning a Winter Drivetrain

2010-02-02 Thread Ethan
As others have said it depends on the conditions. I personally won't
ride my Riv in New England until the spring rains have washed away
most of the salt as that stuff will simply eat a steel frame, and
corrode the hell out of everything else. I have a beater mountain bike
that I used to commute on during the winter. But right now I have a
mixed mode commute and use a Bike Friday folder so I can take it on
public transit as needed. In terms of lube, something that'll stay on
your drivetrain. How often? As often as possible. You really want to
get the grit and more importantly the salt off the bike ASAP. I have a
friend who would truck his bike into his shower and just rinse it down
every time he got home (he was riding @15 miles each way year round at
the time so there was a LOT of muck on the bike).

Enjoy!

Ethan

On Jan 30, 8:44 pm, Mark Hall onmybikem...@gmail.com wrote:
 Got me 63 AHH all fendered up and out on the wet and dirty roads now.
 First time I have ever really done much winter riding. Need some
 recommendations about how often and best method to keep the bike -
 drivetrain, derailleurs, etc - clean.
 Been thoroughly enjoying riding in the wet and with dark clouds above.

 mark

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] TCO in general..

2010-02-02 Thread Horace
I think that for people who think TCO is an issue -- it is, and I don't try
to change their minds. But I think if someone is wondering whether it's
going to be an issue for them... it probably isn't.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] TCO in general..

2010-02-02 Thread Seth Vidal
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Horace max...@sdf.lonestar.org wrote:
 I think that for people who think TCO is an issue -- it is, and I don't try
 to change their minds. But I think if someone is wondering whether it's
 going to be an issue for them... it probably isn't.


TCO was an issue, once, for me on one bike. Then I decided if I was in
a place where it could happen I had to be going so slowly that I'd
just stop and put a foot down.

It's not like I have clips or clipless pedals anyway so putting a foot
down isn't any extra work. :)
-sv

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Cleaning a Winter Drivetrain

2010-02-02 Thread JoelMatthews
If you live in a northern city that uses salt it can be a chore.  A
couple years ago someone - I believe on this list - suggested going to
a self car wash and rinse the drive train down using the low pressure
pre-wash cycle only.

I use this to get the encrusted stuff off, then take the bike home and
finish the job with my regular cleaner and park brush.

If you go this route be very careful not to use the high pressure
function on the wash wand.  Also be prepared for snide remarks from
car owners who frequently seem to think bike cleaners' money is not as
good as theirs.
On Jan 30, 7:44 pm, Mark Hall onmybikem...@gmail.com wrote:
 Got me 63 AHH all fendered up and out on the wet and dirty roads now.
 First time I have ever really done much winter riding. Need some
 recommendations about how often and best method to keep the bike -
 drivetrain, derailleurs, etc - clean.
 Been thoroughly enjoying riding in the wet and with dark clouds above.

 mark

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] 9speed to 8 speed cassettes

2010-02-02 Thread cyclotourist
I think the project is greenlighted!

On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:19 AM, Frederick, Steve
frede...@mail.lib.msu.eduwrote:

  I use 7 cogs from an 8 speed SRAM cassette and the spacers from a worn
 out 7 speed Shimano cassette on my Bridgestone and it works just fine!

 Steve Frederick, East Lansing, MI

 -Original Message-
 *From:* rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com [mailto:
 rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com]*on Behalf Of *cyclotourist
 *Sent:* Monday, February 01, 2010 4:00 PM
 *To:* RBW Owners Bunch
 *Subject:* [RBW] 9speed to 8 speed cassettes

 A combination of pushing my bike up hill yesterday and the new 12-36
 cassette in the latest Reader has me thinking...

 Can I put 8 speed spacers between the cogs of a nine speed cassette and
 simply leave off the smallest cog? My current 8 speed cassette is a 12-32
 XTR (on a spider), and I'd love to get a 34 or even 36 low.  I would never
 need an 11T high, and very rarely use a 12T.

 --
 Cheers,
 David
 Redlands, CA

 Bicycling is a big part of the future. It has to be. There is something
 wrong with a society that drives a car to workout in a gym.  ~Bill Nye,
 scientist guy

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comrbw-owners-bunch%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 .
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comrbw-owners-bunch%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 .
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.




-- 
Cheers,
David
Redlands, CA

Bicycling is a big part of the future. It has to be. There is something
wrong with a society that drives a car to workout in a gym.  ~Bill Nye,
scientist guy

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] TCO in general..

2010-02-02 Thread cyclotourist
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Seth Vidal skvi...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Horace max...@sdf.lonestar.org wrote:
  I think that for people who think TCO is an issue -- it is, and I don't
 try
  to change their minds. But I think if someone is wondering whether it's
  going to be an issue for them... it probably isn't.
 

 TCO was an issue, once, for me on one bike. Then I decided if I was in
 a place where it could happen I had to be going so slowly that I'd
 just stop and put a foot down.

 It's not like I have clips or clipless pedals anyway so putting a foot
 down isn't any extra work. :)
 -sv

 --


Grant et al

I was the OP for this conversation, and was wondering about TCO for a
specific reason:  off-road riding an Atlantis with SPD pedals.  When I'm
clicked in, TCO is bad cuz' I'm not the fastest un-clicker-outer.  That's
mainly only a problem on singletrack.  My AR doesn't have it, but it only
fits 42-44mm tires.  I'm looking at bikes that fit full 29ers, of which the
Atlantis is one.

No disparaging remarks about Atlantis were made or intended at all.  That's
a GREAT bike, no matter how much mucus is all over it!  I'm trying to
rationalize buying one

-- 
Cheers,
David
Redlands, CA

Bicycling is a big part of the future. It has to be. There is something
wrong with a society that drives a car to workout in a gym.  ~Bill Nye,
scientist guy

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Stuff for Sale

2010-02-02 Thread Joe Bartoe

Hi Everyone,

Sorry about the cross-posting, but I have some stuff for sale that might be of 
interest to both lists. You can see the listings at the link below:


http://thesaltycyclist.blogspot.com/2010/02/for-sale-listings.html


Shipping is NOT included in the listed price. As always, please feel free to 
make an offer if you feel that my asking price is out of line.


Thanks for looking,


Joe
  
_
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469230/direct/01/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Cleaning a Winter Drivetrain

2010-02-02 Thread Rick Smith
I've spent a number of winters with steel frames encased in salt. I do
clean them regularly, but all the same, rust does form. Isn't it a
protective seal against further corrosion, though? I've convinced
myself that it's all largely cosmetic and that any steel frame can
withstand salt thrown at it for three months of the year.

On Feb 1, 1:15 pm, geezer bair.m...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi Mark,

 You don't mention whether they salt in your area or not.  I live in
 northern Michigan where they salt with a vengeance.

 I can't ride anything nice in the winter here because of the salt.
 Even when things clear up a bit, any puddles on the road are
 corrosive.  Kiss bare aluminum good-bye, cosmetically.  Tiny paint
 chips on a steel frame become rust spots in minutes.  Its awfully
 disheartening.

 The only solution I have found is to ride a craigslist beater in the
 winter.  Old non-suspension mountain bikes work best.  (We call them
 DUI-cycles around here!)  Clean them periodically at the quarter-wash
 and use a non-sticky lube on the chain.  I look for a bike with fender
 eyelets, decent chainrings and cassettes and a smooth bottom-bracket,
 then give them a tune-up in the fall.  Don't fall in love with them,
 because they're disposable!  It amazes me sometimes how much of a
 licking those old 6 and 7 speed bikes will take and keep on ticking.

 Mike

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Stuff for Sale

2010-02-02 Thread Joe Bunik
Hi Joe. Hmm. 34t 110bcd ring: I'd dig that!

=- Joe Bunik
Walnut Creek, CA



On 2/2/10, Joe Bartoe jbar...@hotmail.com wrote:

 Hi Everyone,

 Sorry about the cross-posting, but I have some stuff for sale that might be
 of interest to both lists. You can see the listings at the link below:


 http://thesaltycyclist.blogspot.com/2010/02/for-sale-listings.html


 Shipping is NOT included in the listed price. As always, please feel free to
 make an offer if you feel that my asking price is out of line.


 Thanks for looking,


 Joe
   
 _
 Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
 http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469230/direct/01/

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Stuff for Sale

2010-02-02 Thread Joe Bunik
OOps, apologies to the list.
=- Joe

On 2/2/10, Joe Bunik jbu...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi Joe. Hmm. 34t 110bcd ring: I'd dig that!

 =- Joe Bunik
 Walnut Creek, CA



 On 2/2/10, Joe Bartoe jbar...@hotmail.com wrote:

 Hi Everyone,

 Sorry about the cross-posting, but I have some stuff for sale that might
 be
 of interest to both lists. You can see the listings at the link below:


 http://thesaltycyclist.blogspot.com/2010/02/for-sale-listings.html


 Shipping is NOT included in the listed price. As always, please feel free
 to
 make an offer if you feel that my asking price is out of line.


 Thanks for looking,


 Joe
  
 _
 Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
 http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469230/direct/01/

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.




-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Franklin Canyon Ride

2010-02-02 Thread Phil Brown


On Jan 31, 12:07 pm, Brad Gantt brdg...@gmail.com wrote:
 I took a nice ride over the hill to Franklin Canyon yesterday. The
 canyon is still quite wet from the recent rains and quite green. After
 climbing out on the Hollywood side, I headed over to Benedict Canyon
 which is a nice long climb that gets progressively steeper as you near
 the top. At only 16.5 miles, the ride still packs in a lot of
 vertical. It was a great ride.

 A few shots are posted here.

 http://www.flickr.com/photos/17053...@n02/sets/72157623321440696/

When I lived in North Hollywood that area was my normal riding area.
There are lots of options to go over the hill to Hollywood and vice
versa. On the Valley side there is a great fire road-dirt but hard
pack-from Laurel Canyon to the top of the ridge at Mulholland and
Coldwater. There is also a trail called White Fence that gets you
there from Studio City about half way up the fire road. At the top of
the ridge you dip down to Beverly Hills and then loop around Benedict.
In the old days-80s-There was a great fire road from the bottom of the
canyon to the top of Coldwater-ruined by development-and a terrific
playground to the west on the old golf course now taken up with multi
million dollar homes. I think it's called Beverly Park.
I miss it.
Phil Brown

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] 9speed to 8 speed cassettes

2010-02-02 Thread CycloFiend
The only other thing I'd be aware of is the rear derailleur.  If you are
running a shorter cage RD, then you may run into some chain tensioning
issues with a rear cassette range like that.

- J

-- 
Jim Edgar
cyclofi...@earthlink.net

³Velvet pillows, safari parks, sunglasses: people have become woolly mice.
They still have bodies that can walk for five days and four nights through a
desert of snow, without food, but they accept praise for having taken a
one-hour bicycle ride.²  - Tim Krabbe, The Rider

Cyclofiend Bicycle Photo Galleries - http://www.cyclofiend.com
Current Classics - Cross Bikes
Singlespeed - Working Bikes

Send In Your Photos! - Here's how: http://www.cyclofiend.com/guidelines

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: 9speed to 8 speed cassettes

2010-02-02 Thread John McMurry
On Feb 1, 4:47 pm, Steve Palincsar palin...@his.com wrote:
 You can't just leave off the smallest sprocket.  You need a first
 position sprocket, i.e., a sprocket with a spacer built in; removing it
 and leaving the 2nd position sprocket hanging in the wind won't do it.

I've taken off the small sprocket on a 9-speed Sram, filled the void
with spacers and it has worked beautifully.

Dura Ace downtube shifts between 8-speed XTR and 8-of-9 Sram are very
crisp.

John McMurry
Burlington, VT

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Franklin Canyon Ride

2010-02-02 Thread Brad Gantt
Phil, I am not familiar with the White Fence trail, at least by that
name. Where specifically does it originate in Studio City? Thanks!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



RE: [RBW] Re: Couple outdoor QB pics

2010-02-02 Thread Frederick, Steve
Thanks, Mike!  I've been pretty impressed with the Fatty R's--had a set on my 
Rawland, too.  They roll nice on pavement, work great on dirt, even feel pretty 
secure over snow-covered ice like in these pics.  Smooth riding tires, too...

I am looking forward to longer rides on dirt and pavement but it was kinda fun 
to get out in such weather just to blow the cobwebs out.

That Singleone is a pretty bike--I don't think you'd be settling if you waited 
for one.  

Steve

-Original Message-
From: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
[mailto:rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com]on Behalf Of Michael_S
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 1:00 PM
To: RBW Owners Bunch
Subject: [RBW] Re: Couple outdoor QB pics


The bike turned out very nice! Love those Fatty Rumpkins!!  Now if you
could just get rid of all that snow you could really enjoy it.

I wish there were some 58 Quickbeams left, I guess I'll just have to
wait for the Simpleone.

Mike
Snowless in SoCal

On Feb 2, 5:16 am, Frederick, Steve frede...@mail.lib.msu.edu
wrote:
 I got out for a bit saturday--only ten or so miles twiddling around on our 
 local MUP and over to my favorite bike shop to show it off.  It was 18 
 degrees so ten miles seemed sufficient!

 Changed a couple of things--put a Dos Eno freewheel on for two speeds that 
 don't require as much wheel movement which in turn allowed me to clean up the 
 rear fender line a bit.  (utilizing SKS quickreleases to allow wheel 
 removal.)  And I switched to a more conventional double crank (Sugino XD) and 
 lost the chain guard but gained a bit bigger inner ring, which was a big 
 help.  Now I can cruise comfortably around 11-14mph whereas with the stock 
 setup I was spinning out around 11mph which is just too low a gear for my 
 local terrain...

 The bike is sooo comforatble--I really love it!  And it's every bit as purty 
 as my Orange Rambouillet in a bit more understated way...

 Fresh, snowy pics:

 http://www.flickr.com/photos/40738...@n08/4316446711/

 http://www.flickr.com/photos/40738...@n08/4317180490/

 Next change I'm considering is adding interrupter levers for braking 
 versatility...

 Steve Frederick, East Lansing, MI

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Nitto Canti Bolt

2010-02-02 Thread Avuncular
Perhaps someone can help me understand how the Nitto canti bolts sold
by RBW might make attachment of a rack to the brake boss safer. It
seems to me that by nudging the rack bracket a little further from the
fork, it increases the mechanical advantage of the rack and bracket,
thereby increasing the pressure on the braze rather than reducing it.

Would it have something to do with the shorter stud on the Nitto bolt
versus the longer stock bolts? That doesn't make immediate sense to
me, but then I'm no engineer, so I'm sure there are many things I
don't know.

Thanks for your comments.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Nitto Canti Bolt

2010-02-02 Thread Seth Vidal
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Avuncular pyrogek...@gmail.com wrote:
 Perhaps someone can help me understand how the Nitto canti bolts sold
 by RBW might make attachment of a rack to the brake boss safer. It
 seems to me that by nudging the rack bracket a little further from the
 fork, it increases the mechanical advantage of the rack and bracket,
 thereby increasing the pressure on the braze rather than reducing it.

 Would it have something to do with the shorter stud on the Nitto bolt
 versus the longer stock bolts? That doesn't make immediate sense to
 me, but then I'm no engineer, so I'm sure there are many things I
 don't know.


It only makes it safer in that you can take the rack on and off w/o
loosening the brake bolt.

-sv

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Nitto Canti Bolt

2010-02-02 Thread CycloFiend
on 2/2/10 5:29 AM, Avuncular at pyrogek...@gmail.com wrote:

 Perhaps someone can help me understand how the Nitto canti bolts sold
 by RBW might make attachment of a rack to the brake boss safer. It
 seems to me that by nudging the rack bracket a little further from the
 fork, it increases the mechanical advantage of the rack and bracket,
 thereby increasing the pressure on the braze rather than reducing it.
 
 Would it have something to do with the shorter stud on the Nitto bolt
 versus the longer stock bolts? That doesn't make immediate sense to
 me, but then I'm no engineer, so I'm sure there are many things I
 don't know.

I think you may be misreading the purpose of that bolt design.

GP's comment about breaking bosses off strikes me as referring to the design
aspect of attaching a rack to the boss in general.  I expect this is why
Rivendell designs with mid-fork brazeons.

I thought that the specific type of bolt extension they sell -

http://www.rivbike.com/products/show/nitto-canti-bolt-and-acorn-nut/20-201

was to prevent the rack, which is often times subject to torque and twisting
from loads, from loosening the bolt. If you use a standard canti mount bolt,
the rack would be between the brake arm and the bolt head, and if the bolt
loosened, you would probably lose your braking.

With the Nitto style bolt, you can torque the bolt down appropriately for
the brake arm, and have a separated nut to hold the rack in place.

The only rack they sell with the canti mount is the Nitto Highrider (shown
on the Bomadil here -

http://www.rivbike.com/products/show/nitto-highrider-front-rack/20-187

but, there are definitely other, lighter duty racks which attach in a
similar manner.

As seth noted, it also makes the rack swap move a bit easier.

- Jim

-- 
Jim Edgar
cyclofi...@earthlink.net

Cyclofiend Bicycle Photo Galleries - http://www.cyclofiend.com
Current Classics - Cross Bikes
Singlespeed - Working Bikes

Send In Your Photos! - Here's how: http://www.cyclofiend.com/guidelines

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: Cleaning a Winter Drivetrain

2010-02-02 Thread Steve Palincsar
On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 09:18 -0800, Rick Smith wrote:
 I've spent a number of winters with steel frames encased in salt. I do
 clean them regularly, but all the same, rust does form. Isn't it a
 protective seal against further corrosion, though? 

no

some forms of aluminum corrosion do act that way, but not rust on steel



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: TCO in general..

2010-02-02 Thread Michael_S
Perhaps the Hunqapillar will fit your yearing for bigger knobby tired
lugged bikes? It is touted as somwhere between the Atlantis and the
Bombadil. I haven't seen any geometry yet but to me that means at
least a 2.0 29er tire. Perhaps Grant can fill in the missing geometry
data so those of us who are searching for that kind of bike ( rough
off-road capable) can decide on whether to wait for the 'Hunqa' or
not.

Mike
Awaiting the Hunqa in SoCal


On Feb 2, 8:55 am, cyclotourist cyclotour...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Seth Vidal skvi...@gmail.com wrote:
  On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Horace max...@sdf.lonestar.org wrote:
   I think that for people who think TCO is an issue -- it is, and I don't
  try
   to change their minds. But I think if someone is wondering whether it's
   going to be an issue for them... it probably isn't.

  TCO was an issue, once, for me on one bike. Then I decided if I was in
  a place where it could happen I had to be going so slowly that I'd
  just stop and put a foot down.

  It's not like I have clips or clipless pedals anyway so putting a foot
  down isn't any extra work. :)
  -sv

  --

 Grant et al

 I was the OP for this conversation, and was wondering about TCO for a
 specific reason:  off-road riding an Atlantis with SPD pedals.  When I'm
 clicked in, TCO is bad cuz' I'm not the fastest un-clicker-outer.  That's
 mainly only a problem on singletrack.  My AR doesn't have it, but it only
 fits 42-44mm tires.  I'm looking at bikes that fit full 29ers, of which the
 Atlantis is one.

 No disparaging remarks about Atlantis were made or intended at all.  That's
 a GREAT bike, no matter how much mucus is all over it!  I'm trying to
 rationalize buying one

 --
 Cheers,
 David
 Redlands, CA

 Bicycling is a big part of the future. It has to be. There is something
 wrong with a society that drives a car to workout in a gym.  ~Bill Nye,
 scientist guy- Hide quoted text -

 - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: TCO in general..

2010-02-02 Thread RonLau
Another Frame builder talked about TCO.

http://davesbikeblog.squarespace.com/blog/2006/11/5/toe-overlap-no-problem.html


There was a discussion recently on Classic Rendezvous Bike list; the
tread titled “Toe overlap even on good bikes,” implied that toe
overlap was a design flaw and one should not expect to see this on
quality bikes. Toe overlap is a result of other critical design
factors and cannot always be avoided especially on smaller frames.

When a framebuilder designs and builds a racing frame, his main
criteria are to: (1.) Place the rider in a position where he can pedal
with maximum efficiency, and (2.) Design the frame so the finished
bike will handle at speed in the best way possible. If the result of
the design is toe overlap then the builder can do little because to
achieve toe clearance other aspects of the frame’s design would have
to be altered.

For example the picture above shows my own bike. It has a small 52 cm.
(C to T) frame and has about an inch of toe overlap. If I were to make
the front end of the bike one inch longer to avoid toe overlap, I
would have to do one of the four following things or a combination of
all four.

(1.) I could make the seat angle steeper, or (2.) the top tube longer.
(3.) I could make the head angle shallower, or (4.) the fork rake
(offset) longer. The first two would effect my riding position; the
last two would affect the handling of the bike.

Toe overlap is not a problem because riding and cornering at normal
speed the front wheel never turns far enough for the toe to hit the
front wheel. The only time it becomes an issue is when turning sharply
at a very slow speed; doing a U-turn on a very narrow road for
example.

Caution and common sense are all that is required when executing a
tight U-turn. If you are turning left then your right pedal will be
down for maximum ground clearance as you coast into the turn. By the
time you need to start pedaling again you are already half way through
the turn, and the right crank has to complete ¾ of a turn before the
toe is opposite the front wheel.

By that time, you should be all the way around and the front wheel is
straight ahead again. If you are not the coast again, or ratchet the
crank back again on the freewheel.

Doing the same maneuver with a fixed gear is a little trickier; but it
is a matter of timing. Go very slow and start to turn as the toe
passes the front wheel; that way the crank has a whole revolution to
go before it makes contact again. If the front wheel is still turned
the next time round; straighten the front wheel so the toe clears,
then turn sharply after it has passed.

Fixed gear and fenders (Mudguards.) is going to make this move a
little difficult, but not impossible. With clipless pedals, you could
unclip the outside foot and move your toe back to give more clearance.
I sometimes get out of the saddle and simply point my toe downwards to
give more clearance.

What you need to avoid is a situation where you get your toe on the
wrong side of the wheel in a turn; if you do, try not to panic.
Ratchet the crank back if you have a freewheel, or if you are riding
fixed gear, keep going and let the toe pass the front wheel so you can
straighten up again.

Lastly, I would like to point out that a racing motorcycle with narrow
swept down handlebars; turning is restricted because the handlebars
touch the fuel tank. Here is a machine that will go 200 mph plus, and
restricted turning seems not to be a problem. Therefore, I maintain
the opinion that toe overlap on a bicycle is neither a design fault
nor a problem.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] For Sale: Nitto Albatross, Tech Stem and Tektro Brake Levers.

2010-02-02 Thread Cheryl Mitchell
Hi Johnny,

Just checking to see when the brake levers were mailed, and if it was
regular USPS. I just want to make sure they're not being held at my local
post office.

Can you let me know?

Thanks
Cheryl

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Johnny Alien johnnyal...@verizon.netwrote:

 Nitto Albatross Bars (CrMo) - $45 shipped

 Nitto Technomic Stem (10cm w/ 25.4mm clamp) - $40 shipped

 Silver Tektro hand brake levers (These are like the handbrakes that
 RIvendell sold that work universally but instead of black with silver
 levers the entire thing is silver.  As far as I can see I can't find
 them for sale anymore.) - $25

 I got all of these used and put them onto a bike but the project is
 halting so I am selling the parts.  They are all in great shape.  USed
 but not scratched up and abused.  The brake levers are essentially
 brand new as those I got new and installed but never used.

 If you are interested email me at johnnyalien at verizon.net

 My ebay id is dahlia11 if you want to check out my feedback.

 Here is a photo of the bars installed.  If someone wants the bars,
 stem and brakes I can leave it all together if you want the shellac'd
 grips.  Otherwise those will be removed and the bar cleaned.


 http://i260.photobucket.com/albums/ii31/Johnny_Alien/1994%20Bridgestone%20XO-3/Full-2.jpg?t=1264086171

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comrbw-owners-bunch%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 .
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.






-- 
“Do or do not... there is no try.”  - Yoda

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: TCO in general..

2010-02-02 Thread PATRICK MOORE
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 4:21 PM, RonLau ron...@ronlau.com wrote:

 Fixed gear and fenders (Mudguards.) is going to make this move a
 little difficult, but not impossible. With clipless pedals, you could
 unclip the outside foot and move your toe back to give more clearance.
 I sometimes get out of the saddle and simply point my toe downwards to
 give more clearance.


In my experience, metal fenders actually help with TCO because they provide
a smooth, rounded surface off which your toe clip or toe will slip more
easily than on the rubber tire.

As with most things, you get used to it and learn to deal with it so that it
becomes a negligible problem.






-- 
Patrick Moore
Albuquerque, NM
For professional resumes, contact
Patrick Moore, ACRW at resumespecialt...@gmail.com
(505) 227-0523

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] TCO

2010-02-02 Thread Don Genovese
TCO nearly brought me down numerous times in the twelve years I've owned a
Rivendell Longlow. Don't kid yourself, it is not necessary to travel 17 mph
to fall and cause severe head injury or a broken hip. I've had both  while
wearing a helmet. The aforementioned injuries were sustained while riding
other than the Rivnedell Longlow, nevertheless

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Nitto Canti Bolt

2010-02-02 Thread EricP
There is another Nitto front rack that also mounts on the brake
bolts.  Not sure of the name, though.  Thought Rivendell sold it, but
not now.

Seems to me this whole thing was spawned by a review in a magazine
that mentioned the possible safety issue.  I can't see it being an
issue.  But it musta been to someone, somewhere, once.

A pair was used to mount an Old Man Mountain rack to my Long Haul
Trucker.  They work as advertised.  Still, it was a chore when I
decided to switch racks over the weekend and remove those mounts. (Ah,
winter boredom.)

Eric Platt
St. Paul, MN

On Feb 2, 1:23�pm, CycloFiend cyclofi...@earthlink.net wrote:
 on 2/2/10 5:29 AM, Avuncular at pyrogek...@gmail.com wrote:

  Perhaps someone can help me understand how the Nitto canti bolts sold
  by RBW might make attachment of a rack to the brake boss safer. It
  seems to me that by nudging the rack bracket a little further from the
  fork, it increases the mechanical advantage of the rack and bracket,
  thereby increasing the pressure on the braze rather than reducing it.

  Would it have something to do with the shorter stud on the Nitto bolt
  versus the longer stock bolts? That doesn't make immediate sense to
  me, but then I'm no engineer, so I'm sure there are many things I
  don't know.

 I think you may be misreading the purpose of that bolt design.

 GP's comment about breaking bosses off strikes me as referring to the design
 aspect of attaching a rack to the boss in general. �I expect this is why
 Rivendell designs with mid-fork brazeons.

 I thought that the specific type of bolt extension they sell -

 http://www.rivbike.com/products/show/nitto-canti-bolt-and-acorn-nut/2...

 was to prevent the rack, which is often times subject to torque and twisting
 from loads, from loosening the bolt. If you use a standard canti mount bolt,
 the rack would be between the brake arm and the bolt head, and if the bolt
 loosened, you would probably lose your braking.

 With the Nitto style bolt, you can torque the bolt down appropriately for
 the brake arm, and have a separated nut to hold the rack in place.

 The only rack they sell with the canti mount is the Nitto Highrider (shown
 on the Bomadil here -

 http://www.rivbike.com/products/show/nitto-highrider-front-rack/20-187

 but, there are definitely other, lighter duty racks which attach in a
 similar manner.

 As seth noted, it also makes the rack swap move a bit easier.

 - Jim

 --
 Jim Edgar
 cyclofi...@earthlink.net

 Cyclofiend Bicycle Photo Galleries -http://www.cyclofiend.com
 Current Classics - Cross Bikes
 Singlespeed - Working Bikes

 Send In Your Photos! - Here's how:http://www.cyclofiend.com/guidelines

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: TCO in general..

2010-02-02 Thread cyclotourist
Yes!  I already mentioned I hope it has... get this... room for 60mm tires
and no TCO!  :-)

But I understand if it doesn't.  That's the extreme end of the design
spectrum, and may not be one of the goals.  That doesn't mean it's covered
in mucus, either!

:-)

On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Michael_S mikeybi...@rocketmail.com wrote:

 Perhaps the Hunqapillar will fit your yearing for bigger knobby tired
 lugged bikes? It is touted as somwhere between the Atlantis and the
 Bombadil. I haven't seen any geometry yet but to me that means at
 least a 2.0 29er tire. Perhaps Grant can fill in the missing geometry
 data so those of us who are searching for that kind of bike ( rough
 off-road capable) can decide on whether to wait for the 'Hunqa' or
 not.

 Mike
 Awaiting the Hunqa in SoCal


 On Feb 2, 8:55 am, cyclotourist cyclotour...@gmail.com wrote:
  On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Seth Vidal skvi...@gmail.com wrote:
   On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Horace max...@sdf.lonestar.org
 wrote:
I think that for people who think TCO is an issue -- it is, and I
 don't
   try
to change their minds. But I think if someone is wondering whether
 it's
going to be an issue for them... it probably isn't.
 
   TCO was an issue, once, for me on one bike. Then I decided if I was in
   a place where it could happen I had to be going so slowly that I'd
   just stop and put a foot down.
 
   It's not like I have clips or clipless pedals anyway so putting a foot
   down isn't any extra work. :)
   -sv
 
   --
 
  Grant et al
 
  I was the OP for this conversation, and was wondering about TCO for a
  specific reason:  off-road riding an Atlantis with SPD pedals.  When I'm
  clicked in, TCO is bad cuz' I'm not the fastest un-clicker-outer.  That's
  mainly only a problem on singletrack.  My AR doesn't have it, but it only
  fits 42-44mm tires.  I'm looking at bikes that fit full 29ers, of which
 the
  Atlantis is one.
 
  No disparaging remarks about Atlantis were made or intended at all.
  That's
  a GREAT bike, no matter how much mucus is all over it!  I'm trying to
  rationalize buying one
 
  --
  Cheers,
  David
  Redlands, CA
 
  Bicycling is a big part of the future. It has to be. There is something
  wrong with a society that drives a car to workout in a gym.  ~Bill Nye,
  scientist guy- Hide quoted text -
 
  - Show quoted text -

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comrbw-owners-bunch%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 .
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.




-- 
Cheers,
David
Redlands, CA

Bicycling is a big part of the future. It has to be. There is something
wrong with a society that drives a car to workout in a gym.  ~Bill Nye,
scientist guy

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: TCO in general..

2010-02-02 Thread newenglandbike
On Feb 2, 8:02 pm, cyclotourist cyclotour...@gmail.com wrote:
 Yes!  I already mentioned I hope it has... get this... room for 60mm tires
 and no TCO!  :-)

 But I understand if it doesn't.  That's the extreme end of the design
 spectrum, and may not be one of the goals.  That doesn't mean it's covered
 in mucus, either!

 :-)


If that's the case then you might want to look at a 559 or 584 (650b)
wheel-size bike, like a 56cm Atlantis or a 56cm Bombadil(?)I don't
think you can get 60mm tires on either, though, but 60mm is pretty
fat.   I think those frames max out at 52mm.The Surly might be
able to fit it, I'm not sure.I think you mentioned in the other
thread that the 60cm Bombadil is too big for you, but the 56 would
probably fit, and it has 650b wheels and zero chance of overlap.   I
have a 56cm Bombadil and really could not be happier with it.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: TCO in general..

2010-02-02 Thread PATRICK MOORE
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:02 PM, cyclotourist cyclotour...@gmail.com wrote:

 Yes!  I already mentioned I hope it has... get this... room for 60mm tires
 and no TCO!  :-)

 .. 70 mms and fenders (TCO be damned)?

Patrick wimpy skinny 60s Moore


-- 
Patrick Moore
Albuquerque, NM
For professional resumes, contact
Patrick Moore, ACRW at resumespecialt...@gmail.com
(505) 227-0523

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: TCO in general..

2010-02-02 Thread Anne Paulson

 Toe overlap is not a problem because riding and cornering at normal
 speed the front wheel never turns far enough for the toe to hit the
 front wheel. The only time it becomes an issue is when turning sharply
 at a very slow speed; doing a U-turn on a very narrow road for
 example.


This is just untrue. Toe clip overlap is also a problem climbing very
steep roads at very slow speeds. At least, it is for me. I had a
Romulus, and I would regularly hit my foot on the wheel on climbs.
Since I like to climb, I traded my Romulus (with 700 c wheels) for an
Atlantis (with smaller wheels).

-- 
-- Anne Paulson

He who wills the ends wills the means

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Sunday AM climb

2010-02-02 Thread muckum
This is a shot from top of my local hill climb on the Atlantis on a
brisk Sunday morning 1-24-10.
Greater LA basin looking north from top of Palos Verdes- (approx. 1300
ft.)
Snow caps on Angeles Crest from the recent storms. Port of LA/ San
Pedro is just off t the right.


/Users/todd/Pictures/iPhoto Library/Modified/2010/Feb 2, 2010/
IMG00031-20100124-1157.jpg

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Nitto Canti Bolt

2010-02-02 Thread Avuncular
Ah, that makes more sense. Thanks to both of you.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Nitto Canti Bolt

2010-02-02 Thread Thaddeus
In my experience with the Nitto m12 rack, the special bolts prevent
the brackets on the rack from tightening against the cantilever brake
arms so tight that the brake doesn't pivot.  The $15 bolts, while
intuitively do reduce mechanical advantage (although the m12 struts
are somewhat pliable), allow the both the brakes and the rack to be
cranked down snugly without choking the brake arm movements.  I have
have an M12 attached to modern cantilever brakes (Tecktro cr720, and/
or Shimano BR550) that requires fancy bolts and another one attached
to some old Mafacs that still pivot well with the stock bolts.  I
can't imagine the brake actually coming loose without the special nuts
unless you were purposely leaving the stock bolts loose to prevent the
brake arms from getting pinched.  Regardless, the double ended bolts
make for a clean install- especially with some acorn nuts covering up
the ends.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Sunday AM climb-photo

2010-02-02 Thread muckum
Lets try this again...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/24971...@n06/4326901594/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] WAS: TCO NOW: Tire Width Smack

2010-02-02 Thread Jon Grant
David, of Redlands, CA, wrote:

60's are for sissies!

---

I am amused to learn that my 42mm Grand Bois Hetres are now considered
³hard, skinny, racing tires.²

--
Jon ³Papa² Grant
Austin, Texas

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] WAS: TCO NOW: Tire Width Smack

2010-02-02 Thread cyclotourist
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Jon Grant jgr...@papagrant.com wrote:

  David, of Redlands, CA, wrote:

 60's are for sissies!

 ---

 I am amused to learn that my 42mm Grand Bois Hetres are now considered
 “hard, skinny, racing tires.”

 *--
 **Jon “Papa” Grant
 *Austin, Texas

 --


Peloton wanna-be!

-- 
Cheers,
David
Redlands, CA

Bicycling is a big part of the future. It has to be. There is something
wrong with a society that drives a car to workout in a gym.  ~Bill Nye,
scientist guy

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] WTB Phil Wood 32h 130 or 135mm Rear Cassette Hub

2010-02-02 Thread Nick
Does anyone have a Phil Wood 32 hole cassette rear hub in new or used
condition they would like to sell? I will take a wheel or just the
hub. Really looking for just the hub - but will take a wheel if that
is what you have. If it is a wheel, I have no rim size preference b/c
I will just cut out the hub and relace it to my own rim - unless your
rim is a 650b offset Synergy with Sapim Laser spokes

Thanks!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Nitto Canti Bolt

2010-02-02 Thread Mitch Browne
Hopefully on topic since the canti bolts are suggested for it. Does
the Nitto M12 readily mate to an Atlantis? I saw a post with picture
in the past where the rack support that connects to the stud didn't
quite line up and the owner was fearful of tweaking the rack to much.
Later I saw other Atlantis pictures with the rack successfully
installed. I'm building up an Atlantis and would like to include this
rack in the build along with the canti bolts.

Thanks, Mitch - San Luis Obispo, CA

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: TCO in general..

2010-02-02 Thread amoll68
Hello all,

This is kind of an interesting topic, and I think about it
sometimes . . . so I'll add some thoughts. I have 8, or so, bikes
(guess I need one more?) 6 of them don't have TCO, but my two FAVORITE
bikes do: my 63cm AHH, and my 25 Jack Taylor (which has WAY more fork
rake than the AHH.) Both of those bikes have fenders, and I might not
have TCO if I removed the fenders (which I won't.) If those were my
only bikes, I'd probably remember the TCO, and use proper low-speed
techniques to compensate. It hasn't been a huge problem: I just
occasionally graze the fenders on both, and quickly remember to adjust
myself. IF you are riding unclipped, then it's pretty easy to put a
foot down - especially with a low BB.

Bottom line: my two favorite bikes have TCO, and it's not a big deal
to me, just a minor, occasional annoyance.

FYI: my other bikes are mainly variations of mountain bikes, including
my Bike Friday with 20 wheels - no TCO there! The only sport touring
bike that I have with no TCO is a '74 Schwinn Sports Tourer, and it
has fenders too. It's a great bike, but I like the AHH and the JT
better . . .

I do understand that some may hate it - especially if you've had to
eat pavement, or something.

Best!

Alex Moll
Seattle (ish), WA

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] TCO in general..

2010-02-02 Thread PATRICK MOORE
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:22 PM, james black chocot...@gmail.com wrote:

  Bicycles should not cause this kind
 of low-grade anxiety. It's unnecessary - if a bike has TCO, the wheels
 are too big. Design it out with smaller wheels!

 Oh, c'mon. TCO tolerance is as personal as saddle likes and pedal choices.
I have no problem adapting to TCO with (1) clips and (2) fenders and (3)
fixed drivetrain. I'd rather have TCO than other compromises, like smaller
wheels -- on the Motobecane -- or poorer handling or weight distribution.

Patrick anxiety? what anxiety? Moore, who automatically thinks about TCO
even with his 559/571 bikes and finds it doesn't bother him in the least.

-- 
Patrick Moore
Albuquerque, NM
For professional resumes, contact
Patrick Moore, ACRW at resumespecialt...@gmail.com
(505) 227-0523

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: TCO in general..

2010-02-02 Thread Tim McNamara

On Feb 2, 2010, at 9:22 PM, james black wrote:

On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 23:36, Grant Petersen gr...@rivbike.com  
wrote:


TCO ends up being a problem---in my opinion---only in theoretics,  
but not in
practice. THere are some builders who would disagree; and although  
in the
spirit of diplomacy and reasonableness and agreeing to disagree  
and all
that, I accept thatI can't understand it. To fear TCO or to  
regard it as
Dangerouswell, it's ust something that to me doesn't make any  
sense.


I also disagree - I strongly dislike toe clip overlap, having
encountered it on a few frames (I usually ride long-raked 60-62cm
frames now, so have little problem). It can be a problem
trackstanding, riding slowly, turning sharply while riding a fixed
gear, riding offroad, and climbing slowly. If it doesn't make you
crash, it's still annoying, inconvenient, and I don't want to sit
around while riding constantly thinking, Oh, I better be careful not
to jamb my shoe into my fender. Bicycles should not cause this kind
of low-grade anxiety. It's unnecessary - if a bike has TCO, the wheels
are too big. Design it out with smaller wheels!


Easier said than done.  Any standard bike 60 cm or smaller will have  
to have 559 wheels- even 650B isn't small enough to guarantee no  
TCO.  Most people find those aesthetics unacceptable as the small  
wheels makes the bike look like a toy in their eyes (I ride a '96 60  
cm All Rounder with 559s, so I get that reaction a lot).


Bicycle design involves compromises.  You can eliminate TCO with a 68  
degree head angle and 70 mm fork offset.  But most people don't want  
to ride the bikes that would result from that geometry (You'll find  
that geometry on millions of old British 3 speeds.  They handle like  
wheelbarrows but no TCO).  You can eliminate TCO with a 62 cm top  
tube and normal angles, but nobody under 6 feet tall will be able to  
ride it and it'll look funny on a 56 cm frame.  Or you can use a  
naked 23 mm wide tire instead of a 45 mm tire with fenders.  Or you  
can build frames with tiny trail due to huge fork offsets (but I  
won't buy 'em.  I had that geometry years ago, don't want it again.  
55 mm trail is just about right).


Sorry folks, but TCO is a necessary design compromise in many cases.   
Get a pencil, some graph paper, a compass, a straightedge and draw up  
some proportional drawings of bikes.  You'll see the hopeless problem  
pretty quickly.  It's easy to say get rid of TCO but it's well-nigh  
impossible to do so in every instance without designing something  
like the Moulton.  I've done enough frame design to have worked this  
out for myself.


I've got bikes with TCO, having size 13 feet and not liking to pedal  
on my tippy toes results in this.  I haven't have a crash or a near  
crash in years, the last being riding fixed on the street on my old  
track bike (zero toe overlap problems on the velodrome, which is  
where such bikes belong.  They don't belong on the street, speaking  
from experience) years ago.  I'm used to the TCO since most of the  
bikes I've owned since I was 14 have had TCO, I don't pedal through  
corners at low speeds and have low enough gears- and thankfully  
enough strength- to not have to weave back and forth up hills.  My  
riding style is adapted to the reality of my bikes.  It's just not a  
problem.


I think there are a number of us who want our cake and get to eat it  
too:  sporty fast geometry with 45 mm tires, full fenders and no  
TCO.  I'd say pick two.  Some enchiladas can't be readily served  
whole.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.